BRIEF COMMUNICATION HLA-DR-matched Parental Donors for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with High-risk Acute Leukemia Shang-Ju Wu, Ming Yao,* Jih-Luh Tang, Bo-Sheng Ko, Hwei-Fang Tien, Yao-Chang Chen The immunomodulating effect of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR and the central role of CD4 T cells in alloimmunity provide clues suggesting that HLA-DR-matched, partially mismatched related donors could be feasible alternative donors of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells for transplantations (allo- HSCT). We describe our experience with allo-hsct in eight patients with high-risk acute leukemia; donors included one of each of the parents. Among the eight patients, seven were identical HLA-DR matches with the donors. The stem cells were not manipulated in vitro. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of antithymocyte globulin, cyclosporine, and methotrexate. All patients had successful trilineage engraftment. Only one patient had grade 2 4 acute GVHD. Two patients died before day +100 due to complications. At the end of follow-up, four patients had survived for 18 48 months and three are alive and without relapse. Our results suggest that HLA-DR fully-matched parents are feasible alternative donors for allo-hsct in patients with high-risk acute leukemia under an intensive conditioning regimen. [J Formos Med Assoc 2009;108(5):423 427] Key Words: allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, HLA-DR, parental donors Patients with high-risk acute leukemia or those who have relapsed leukemia should receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-hsct) in an attempt to cure. 1 Unfortunately, allo-hsct may not be an option for some patients due to lack of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)- matched donors, siblings or matched-unrelated. 2 To increase the donor pool, investigators have conducted clinical trials using partially-mismatched related donors as sources of allogeneic stem cells for transplantations. 3 However, the disparity in HLA leads to uncontrolled graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). 4 Although the severity of GVHD may be reduced by ex vivo removal of T cells from the stem cell harvest, T cell depletion is associated with delay or failure of sustained engraftment and immune reconstitution as well as higher relapse risk. 5 The underlying alloreactivity of GVHD is not well understood. Nonetheless, CD4+ T cells appear to play a central role in orchestrating the immune response to class II HLA molecules by initiating a number of effecter mechanisms. 6 Furthermore, experience with renal and heart transplantation shows that transfusion of HLA-DR matched blood components before transplantation was associated with a lower incidence of graft rejection. 7,8 The current hypothesis for this 2009 Elsevier & Formosan Medical Association................................................. Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Received: March 12, 2008 Revised: September 11, 2008 Accepted: September 24, 2008 *Correspondence to: Dr Ming Yao, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan. E-mail: yaoming@ntu.edu.tw J Formos Med Assoc 2009 Vol 108 No 5 423
S.J. Wu, et al lower incidence of rejection is that CD4+ regulatory T cells that recognize a foreign peptide in the context of the shared HLA-DR molecules play an important role in downregulation of the immune response toward the graft. 9 Based on these findings, we hypothesized that the HLA barrier between recipients and both their HLA- DR antigen-matched parental donors could be largely eliminated. Here, we present our pilot experience in eight patients with high-risk acute leukemia who underwent allo-hsct from parental donors with matched HLA-DR antigens. Methods Patients and their parents had HLA-A, B, and DR antigens determined by standard serological techniques and donors were selected providing that HLA-DR matched. The donors were given 10 μg/kg of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) (Filgrastim; Kirin Pharma, Japan) daily for 5 days. Peripheral blood stem cells were collected on days 5 and 6. The collected peripheral blood stem cells were not manipulated in vitro. The conditioning regimen consisted of either fractional total body irradiation (total 1200 cgy given on days 6 to 4, patients 1 and 2) or busulfan (4 mg/kg orally in divided doses daily on days 7 to 4, total 16 mg/kg, patients 3 8) combined with cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg/day intravenously on days 3 and 2) and fludarabine (Fludara; Intendis Manufacturing S.P.A, Italy; 30 mg/m 2 /day intravenously on days 8 to 4). GVHD prophylaxis included rabbit antithymocyte immunoglobulin (Thymoglobulin; Genzyme, France; 2.5 mg/kg/day on days 3 to 1), cyclosporine (Sandimmun; Novartis, Switzerland; 3 mg/kg/day intravenously starting on day 1) and short course methotrexate (15 mg/m 2 intravenously on day +2, 10 mg/m 2 on days +4, +7 and +12). G-CSF 300 μg daily was given from day +5 until the absolute neutrophil count exceeded 1 10 9 /L. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 antigenemia analysis as reported previously was performed weekly on peripheral nucleated cells from the day of engraftment to day +100 for preemptive therapy. 10,11 The bone marrow study was repeated after hematopoietic recovery to determine the post-transplantation disease status and donor chimerism. Results The characteristics of the eight patients are summarized in Table 1. All patients either had cytogenetic abnormalities making them at poor risk for cure or had relapses, thus, they had very low chances of cure with conventional chemotherapy alone. All patients lacked fully HLA-matched siblings as donors and searching failed to identify matched unrelated donors through the hematopoietic stem cell donor registry. The donors were four mothers and four fathers. HLA incompatibility for GVHD direction included two loci mismatches in five patients, and one loci mismatch in three patients. Seven patients had identical serological HLA-DR types with their donors. For the remaining patient (patient 6), HLA-DR antigens, DR11 of the donor and DR12 of the patient, belonged to the same antigen of original broad specificities, DR5 (http://www.anthonynolan.org. uk/hig/lists/broad.html), and was also included in this report. The transplantation courses and outcomes are summarized in Table 2. The median CD34 + cell number infused was 5.70 10 6 cells/kg weight (range, 1.96 8.75 10 6 ). Hematopoietic recovery was rapid. The median time to achieve an absolute neutrophil count of more than 0.5 10 9 /L was 12 days (range, 11 16 days); the time to achieve an absolute platelet count of greater than 20 10 9 /L was 15.5 days (range, 11 31 days). All patients achieved complete donor chimerism, which was confirmed by sex chromosome analysis or short tandem repeat polymorphism analysis of bone marrow cells. No patient had graft rejection or graft failure. The two patients who had refractory disease before transplantation achieved disease remission after transplantation. Only one patient had 424 J Formos Med Assoc 2009 Vol 108 No 5
HLA-DR-matched parental donors for allogeneic HSCT Table 1. Demographic details of patients Patient 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Age (yr) 20 16 19 24 23 27 25 25 Sex M M M F F M M F Diagnosis ALL, pre-b ALL, early AML, M1 ALL, pre-b AML, M2 AML, M4 AML, M1 ALL, pre-b pre-b Cytogenetics Complex Normal Normal t(9;22) t(7;11) Trisomy 8 Complex 11q- Disease status CR2 Refractory, CR2 CR1 CR1 Relapse, CR1 CR2 (morphology) primary refractory Diagnosis to 42 11 12 5 8 19 6 9 HSCT (mo) Donor (age, yr) Mother Mother Father Father Father Mother Father Mother (51) (46) (48) (52) (53) (66) (52) (52) HLA disparity HVG 2 1 1 1 0 2* 2 2 GVH 1 1 2 2 2 2* 1 2 *With disparity at the DR locus. ALL = acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML = acute myelogenous leukemia; CR = complete remission; HSCT = hematopoietic stem cell transplant; HLA = human leukocyte antigen; HVG = host-versus-graft; GVH = graft-versus-host. Table 2. Transplantation courses and outcomes Patient 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CD34 + cell (10 6 /kg) 4.75 5.82 3.65 5.58 7.03 1.96 8.75 8.18 ANC recovery* 16 12 15 11 12 12 13 11 PLT recovery* 31 20 16 11 11 15 16 12 CMV Reactivation + + + Frank disease + + GVHD Acute (grade) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 Chronic Extensive 0 NE 0 0 Limited NE 0 Leukemia status Post-HSCT CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR Final CCR Relapse CR Relapse Relapse CCR CR CCR (day +113) (day +350) (day +355) Outcomes Survival +48 mo 149 d 97 d 15 mo +43 mo +39 mo 93 d +18 mo Cause of death Relapse Fungal Relapse CMV pneumonia pneumonitis *Days to reach ANC > 0.5 10 9 /ml and platelet count > 20 10 9 /ml; after donor leukocyte infusion for suspicious early relapse on day +142; CR achieved after salvage chemotherapy and donor lymphocyte infusion. ANC = absolute neutrophil count; PLT = platelets; CMV = cytomegalovirus; GVHD = graftversus-host disease; HSCT = hematopoietic stem cell transplant; Ext = extensive; NE = not evaluable; CR = complete remission; CR1 = first CR; CR2 = second CR; CCR = continuous CR; SCT = stem cell transplantation. J Formos Med Assoc 2009 Vol 108 No 5 425
S.J. Wu, et al Probability 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 acute GVHD of more than grade 1 that was then controlled by corticosteroid therapy. Among the six evaluable patients who survived beyond 100 days, two had chronic GVHD. Three patients had CMV reactivation and received gancyclovir preemptive therapy. Unfortunately, CMV reactivation progressed in one patient who died due to documented CMV pneumonitis before D + 100. The other patient died within the first 100 days after transplantation due to Aspergillus pneumonia. Three patients had disease relapse on days 113, 350, and 355, respectively. One of these three patients obtained subsequent complete remission after salvage chemotherapy followed by donor lymphocyte infusion (patient 5). The other three patients remained disease free and all of them experienced acute or chronic GVHD. With the median follow-up duration of 39 months, the overall survival rate was 50.0% and the relapse-free survival was 37.5% (Figure). Discussion 12 24 Months From this pilot study, the high engraftment rate and low incidence of severe GVHD suggest that sharing both HLA-DR loci is associated with immunologic tolerance. The differential influence of HLA-DR-matching versus HLA-A, B has also been addressed recently in a renal transplantation 36 OS: 50.0% RFS: 37.5% Figure. Kaplan-Meier curve of overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) of patients after parental-donor transplantation. 48 study which showed the association between fully HLA-DR compatible grafts and lower graft rejection rate, which is compatible with our hypothesis. 12 Furthermore, in our patients, the HLA barrier can be easily overcame by an easy and tolerable conditioning regimen and GVHD prophylaxis, which are feasible in most transplantation units, without the need of T-cell depletion or other cell manipulations that are usually available primarily in academic transplantation centers. This advantage gives this procedure, if can be further confirmed, even higher potency because of low threshold of facility or laboratory requirements. The serological HLA typing in this report may be challenged because these patients may not be truly HLA-DR matched with their donors if methods of higher resolution were used. However, in our series, the risk of GVHD or graft failure was low, suggesting that the immunotolerance was adequate. Besides, the goal of this strategy is to expand the donor pool by overcoming the HLA barrier rather and to decrease GVHD by perfect HLA matching. Thus, higher resolution of HLA typing to differentiate the HLA-DR alleles may not be needed in this clinical setting. Although the series is too small to make a solid conclusion, it suggests that allo-hsct from parental donors sharing HLA-DR loci may be feasible under an ATG- and fludarabine-based conditioning regimen for selected patients with high-risk leukemia who lack other fully HLAmatched donors. This therapy warrants a larger confirmatory study to better characterize the technique. References 1. Appelbaum FR. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia. Semin Oncol 1997;24: 114 23. 2. Thomas ED. Karnofsky Memorial Lecture. Marrow transplantation for malignant diseases. J Clin Oncol 1983;1: 517 31. 3. Henslee-Downey PJ. Mismatched bone marrow transplantation. Curr Opin Oncol 1995;7:115 21. 426 J Formos Med Assoc 2009 Vol 108 No 5
HLA-DR-matched parental donors for allogeneic HSCT 4. Beatty PG, Clift RA, Mickelson EM, et al. Marrow transplantation from related donors other than HLA-identical siblings. N Engl J Med 1985;313:765 71. 5. Anasetti C, Amos D, Beatty PG, et al. Effect of HLA compatibility on engraftment of bone marrow transplants in patients with leukemia or lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1989;320: 197 204. 6. Lechler R, Warrens A. HLA and transplantation I: allorecognition of HLA molecules in transplantation. In: HLA in Health and Disease, 2 nd edition. Academic Press, 2000. 7. Middleton D, Martin J, Douglas J, et al. Transfusion of one HLA-DR antigen-matched blood to potential recipients of a renal allograft. Transplantation 1994;58:845 8. 8. Lagaaij EL, Hennemann IP, Ruigrok M, et al. Effect of one-hla-dr-antigen-matched and completely HLA-DRmismatched blood transfusions on survival of heart and kidney allografts. N Engl J Med 1989;321:701 5. 9. Waanders MM, Roelen DL, Brand A, et al. The putative mechanism of the immunomodulating effect of HLA-DR shared allogeneic blood transfusions on the alloimmune response. Transfus Med Rev 2005;19:281 7. 10. Osarogiagbon RU, Defor TE, Weisdorf MA, et al. CMV antigenemia following bone marrow transplantation: risk factors and outcomes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2000;6:280 8. 11. Kanda Y, Mineishi S, Saito T, et al. Pre-emptive therapy against cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease guided by CMV antigenemia assay after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a single-center experience in Japan. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001;27:437 44. 12. Doxiadis II, de Fijter JW, Mallat MJ, et al. Simpler and equitable allocation of kidneys from postmortem donors primarily based on full HLA-DR compatibility. Transplantation 2007;83:1207 13. J Formos Med Assoc 2009 Vol 108 No 5 427