as a Mechanism of Stent Failure

Similar documents
2yrs 2-6yrs >6yrs BMS 0% 22% 42% DES 29% 41% Nakazawa et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:

Insights in Thrombosis and In-Stent Restenosis

IVUS-Guided d Provisional i Stenting: Plaque or Carina Shift. Soo-Jin Kang, MD., PhD.

OCT Findings: Lesson from Stable vs Unstable Plaques

IVUS Assessment of the Mechanism of In-stent Restenosis? Gary S. Mintz, MD Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Imaging Overview for Vulnerable Plaque: Data from IVUS Trial and An Introduction to VH-IVUS Imgaging

Can IVUS Define Plaque Features that Impact Patient Care?

Imaging Atheroma The quest for the Vulnerable Plaque

Catch-up Phenomenon: Insights from Pathology

Left main coronary artery (LMCA): The proximal segment

Drug eluting stents (DES) have decreased

OCT; Comparative Imaging Results with IVUS, VH and Angioscopy

Appearance of Lipid-Laden Intima and Neovascularization After Implantation of Bare-Metal Stents

IVUS Analysis. Myeong-Ki. Hong, MD, PhD. Cardiac Center, Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Pathology of Vulnerable Plaque Angioplasty Summit 2005 TCT Asia Pacific, Seoul, April 28-30, 2005

The PROSPECT Trial. A Natural History Study of Atherosclerosis Using Multimodality Intracoronary Imaging to Prospectively Identify Vulnerable Plaque

Plaque Shift vs. Carina Shift Prevalence and Implication

Assessment of Vulnerable Plaque by IVUS and VH-IVUS

The Pathology of Neoatherosclerosis in Human Coronary Implants

Added Value of Invasive Coronary Imaging for Plaque Rupture and Erosion

Invasive Coronary Imaging Modalities for Vulnerable Plaque Detection

Optical Coherence Tomography for Intracoronary Imaging

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY. Konstantina P. Bouki, FESC 2 nd Department of Cardiology General Hospital Of Nikea, Pireaus

Sites of Atherosclerosis In order of Frequency

Cardiovascular Research Foundation and Columbia University Medical Center, New York.

Vulnerable Plaque Pathophysiology, Detection, and Intervention. VP: A Local Problem or Systemic Disease. Erling Falk, Denmark

IN-STENT RESTENOSIS. K.Boerlage-van Dijk CarVasZ 2014

OCT Analysis in Patients With Very Late Stent Thrombosis

Review Article Pathologic Etiologies of Late and Very Late Stent Thrombosis following First-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Placement

Culprit Lesion Remodeling and Long-term (> 5years) Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Pathology of Coronary Artery Disease

Assessment of plaque morphology by OCT in patients with ACS

Plaque Characteristics in Coronary Artery Disease. Chourmouzios Arampatzis MD, PhD, FESC

Noninvasive Coronary Imaging: Plaque Imaging by MDCT

malapposition assessed by OCT

The PROSPECT Trial. A Natural History Study of Atherosclerosis Using Multimodality Intracoronary Imaging to Prospectively Identify Vulnerable Plaque

Gary S. Mintz,, MD. IVUS Observations in Acute (vs Chronic) Coronary Artery Disease: Structure vs Function

PCI for Left Anterior Descending Artery Ostial Stenosis

Usefulness of OCT during coronary intervention

Clinical Characteristics of In-stent Neoatherosclerosis Causing Late Stent Failure

Que nos puede aportar el OCT intracoronario

Clinical Value of OCT. Guidance for Coronary Stenting. Giulio Guagliumi, MD

Between Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve

Invasive Imaging (IVUS, VH-IVUS, and OCT): How I Implement into My

Upgrade of Recommendation

New Insight about FFR and IVUS MLA

OCT Technology: Differences between Biodegradable and Durable Polymers: Insights from the LEADERS Trial LEADERS OCT

DESolve NX Trial Clinical and Imaging Results

Analysis of macrophage accumulation using optical coherence tomography one year after sirolimus, paclitaxel and zotarolimus-eluting stent

Assessment of vulnerable plaque by OCT

Citation Journal of Cardiology Cases (2013), Ltd.; この論文は出版社版でありません 引用の際には出版社版をご確認ご利用ください This is not the publ

PCI for Long Coronary Lesion

Research Article Pathological Perspective of Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis

Integrating IVUS, FFR, and Noninvasive Imaging to Optimize Outcomes. Gary S. Mintz, MD Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Histopathology: Vascular pathology

Prevention of Coronary Stent Thrombosis and Restenosis

What Does the Yellow Color of Angioscopy Mean? Why Yellow Plaque Is Always Vulnerable?

Prognostic Value of Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT

CPIS So-Yeon Choi, MD., PhD. Department of Cardiology Ajou University School of MedicineSuwon, Korea

Advance Publication. Atherosclerotic Component of the Yellow Segment After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation on Coronary Angioscopy

Stent Fracture and Longitudinal Compression on CT Angiography between the

Pathology of the Vulnerable Plaque

PCI for In-Stent Restenosis. CardioVascular Research Foundation

Characteristics of Neoatherosclerosis Within Implanted Coronary Stents in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes

A Novel Low Pressure Self Expanding Nitinol Coronary Stent (vprotect): Device Design and FIH Experience

Drug Eluting Stent DES Pathology Update What we know, what we do not know

Integrated Use of IVUS and FFR for LM Stenting

Muzina Akhtar, Wei Liu. History of ISR visualization. Introduction

Evaluation of stent placement and outcomes with optical coherence tomography

Biology of in-stent restenosis and rational for debulking

BIOFREEDOM: Polymer free Biolimus A9 eluting

Failure of positive. Recanalization and CTO formation. TCFA rupture with (fatal) thrombotic occlusion. TCFA Lipid pool

Review Article Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging in Acute Coronary Syndromes

High-risk vulnerable plaques. Kostis Raisakis G.Gennimatas General Hospital of Athens

RESTENOSIS Facing up to the problem

Can We Identify Vulnerable Patients & Vulnerable Plaque?

Tratamiento de la Reestenosis del Stent Farmacoactivo

Κλινική Χρήση IVUS και OCT PERIKLIS A. DAVLOUROS ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF CARDIOLOGY INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY & CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE

The BIO revolution: bioadsorbable stents. Federico Conrotto Cardiologia 2 Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

Optical coherence tomography patterns of in-stent restenosis: Comparison between bare-metal stent and drug-eluting stent

Pathology of Second-Generation Everolimus-Eluting Stents Versus First-Generation Sirolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Humans

Percutaneous Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Disease

PCI in Patients with Transplant Coronary Artery Disease. Michael S. Lee, MD, FACC, FSCAI Assistant Professor UCLA School of Medicine

2010 Korean Society of Cardiology Spring Scientific Session Korea Japan Joint Symposium. Seoul National University Hospital Cardiovascular Center

Left Main Intervention: Will it become standard of care?

Cottrell Memorial Lecture. Has Reversing Atherosclerosis Become the New Gold Standard in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease?

PCI for Bifurcation Coronary Lesion

Index. B Bare metal stents (BMS) vs. DES, 172 OCT findings, 170, 172

The Latest Experimental Results of Endothelialization with BuMA stent. Renu Virmani, MD CVPath Institute, Inc. Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

Drug Filled Stent Optical Coherence Tomography Results from RevElution Trial Stent Strut Coverage and Stent Apposition

Evaluation COMBO s Healing Profile The EGO-COMBO Serial OCT Study

Left Main PCI. Integrated Use of IVUS and FFR. Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD

In-stent Restenosis Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges. Kostis Raisakis General Hospital of Athens «G. Gennimatas»

Optical Coherence Tomography

Basics of Angiographic Interpretation Analysis of Angiography

REVIEWS. Causes, assessment, and treatment of stent thrombosis intravascular imaging insights. Daniel S. Ong and Ik-Kyung Jang

Smooth muscle pharmacology & interventional cardiology

So-Yeon Choi, MD., PhD. Department of Cardiology Ajou University School of Medicine, Korea

FFR-guided Jailed Side Branch Intervention

Transcription:

In-Stent t Neoatherosclerosis e osc e os s as a Mechanism of Stent Failure Soo-Jin Kang MD., PhD. University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Heart Institute Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea

Disclosure I have nothing to disclose

Evolving Neointima after BMS Implantation Histologic and Angioscopic Evidences

Tri-phasic Bi-phasic Luminal Response Extended 3 Years Follow-up after BMS Study Implantation 7-10 years MLD (mm) 4.0 3.0 2.0 Intermediate-term Regression p<0.001 p<0.001 001 10 1.0 Early Phase Restenosis Late phase Re-narrowing Post-PCIPCI 6Mo 3Yr >4Yr Traditionally, intimal hyperplasia has been believed to be stable with an early peak and a late quiescent period Kimura et al. N Engl J Med 1996;334:561-6 6 Kimura et al. Circulation 2002;105:2986-91

4.0 ML LD (mm) 3.0 20 2.0 p<0.001 p<0.001 1.0 Post-PCI 6Mo 3Yr > 4Yr Early Restenotic Intermediate Regression Late Re-narrowing Pathologic mechanism * Fibrotic maturation * SMC maturation Proteoglycan-rich rich SMC proliferation * Proteoglycan * Cellularity * Neointimal thinning de-novo o neoatherosclerosis Farb et al. Circulation 2004;110:940-7

Pathologic Definition of Neoatherosclerosis Peri-strut foamy macrophage clusters with or without calcification, fibroatheroma, and ruptures with thrombosis in in-stent neointima lipid-laden macrophage adherent thrombi neointimal disruption 5-year f/u of Palmaz Schatz 3-year f/u of Palmaz Schatz Hasegawa et al. Cathe and Cardiovasc Interv 2006;68:554 8 8 Inoue et al. Cardiovascular Pathology 2004;14:109 15

Atherosclerotic Transformation after BMS Implantation Serial Angioscopic Observation at Extended Follow-Up 121-month F/U GFX Stent 107-month F/U Multilink Diam meter Sten nosis (%) 3.6% 18.4% White neointima often changes into yellow plaque over time Atherosclerotic ti degeneration represented as yellow Late luminal narrowing ( %DS) between early (6-12 mo) and late ( 4yr) plaque follow-up contributed is greater to the in segments late luminal with yellow narrowing plaque as well as rupture re with thrombotic eventsents Yokoyama et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:205-12

Intimal Hyperplasia p after DES Implantation Histologic and Angioscopic Evidences

Dominant IH As a General Mechanism of DES-ISR MLA 2.7mm 2 Stent CSA 11.0mm 2 %IH 75% Ste nt area at the MLA site (mm 2 ) 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 4% 75% 88% 8% 13% 20 40 60 80 %IH area at the MLA site (%) 100 Kang et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:9-14

Late Catch-up in DES mm Serial F/U of MLD 5.0 P<0.0001 4.0 3.0 2.0 2.59 2.41 2.26 1.0 Serial F/U %IH Volume %IH volum me (%) 20 15 10 5 0 All lesions PES SES * 6 mo vs. 2 yr *p=0.049049 *p=0.010 *p=0.046 0-5 Post- Procedure 6-Mo 2-Yr Post- Stenting 6 Mo 2 Yr Park et al. Int J Cardiol. 2010 Sep in press Kang et al. Am J Cardiol 2010;105:1402-8

Early Histopathologic Findings within 1 year between BMS- vs. DES-ISR Restenotic ti neointima was composed of proteoglycanrich SMC with different phenotypes and fibrolipid Chieffo et al. Am J Cardiol 2009;104:1660 7 Early necrotic core with No atherosclerotic ti cholesterol clefts change Neoatherosclerosis DES 13 months was more frequent BMS in DES-lesions 15 months (DES 35% vs. BMS 10%) and occurs earlier Nakazawa et al. JACC Cariovasc Imaging 2009;2:625-8

Different Timing of Neoatherosclerosis BMS vs. DES (%) change 100 80 60 DES Athero osclerotic 40 20 0 BMS 3 6 9 12 18 24 48 >60 Duration (months) Earliest In addition, atherosclerotic earliest change necrotic with core foamy formation macrophage in DES infiltration was observed began at 9 from months, 4 months which after was DES earlier implantation, than BMS while the change lesions in developed BMS occurred at 5 years beyond 2 years Nakazawa et al. JACC Cariovasc Imaging 2009;2:625-8

Neoatherosclerosis DES BMS Incidence 31% 16% Median F/U time point 14 Mo 72 Mo Nakazawa et al. JACC 2011;57:1314 22

Various Stages of Neoatherosclerosis FA, Early NC (13mo-SES) FA, Late NC (17mo-SES) DES BMS TCFA (61mo-BMS) Th Rupture, thrombi (61mo-BMS) Nakazawa et al. JACC 2011;57:1314-22

Independent Risk Factors for Neoatherosclerosis OR 95% CI p Age, /year 0.963 0.942-0.983 <0.001 Stent duration (/month) 1.028 1.017-1.041 <0.001 SES usage 6.534 3.387-12.591387 <0.001001 PES usage 3.200 1.584-6.469 0.001 Underlying unstable lesion (rupture, TCFA) 2.387 1.326-4.302 0.004 Nakazawa et al. JACC 2011;57:1314 22

More Advanced Neoatherosclerosis TCFA-Containing C i Neointima Intimal rupture Thrombosis 23-month SES 96-month BMS Unstable Neointima >5 years in BMS 2 years in DES Although uncovered struts remains the primary cause of DES-VLST, neointimal rupture may be added as another risk factor Nakazawa et al. JACC 2011;57:1314-22

Angioscopic DES Follow-Up at 10 Months Yellow Grade Changes Prevalence of Thrombi 1.4 1.9 30 25 20 15 10 p<0.01 vs. white 14/55 5 0 Yellow 3/57 White The development of atherosclerotic yellow plaques may be a possible substrate for late stent thrombosis Higo et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:616-24

Neoatherosclerosis Contributing Mechanism of Stent Failure Broad Spectrum of Clinical Presentations from In-Stent Restenosis to Very Late Stent Thrombosis

30 AMI with VLST (Mean F/U 33 Mo in DES, 108 Mo in BMS) 19.5±6.0 Mean EEM CSA, mm 2 Mean Lumen CSA, mm 2 4.2±1.4 Mean Neointima, mm 2 3.0±1.1 Minimal stent CSA, mm 2 6.1±1.5 Neointima rupture Malapposition DES BMS (n=23) (n=7) 10 (44%) 22 (74%) 18.3±4.1 4.7±4.6 5.0±1.7* 7.4±3.7 7 (100%)* 0 (0%)* Neoatheroclerosis may contribute to the development of VLST as a common Lee CW mechanism et al. J Am Coll Cardiol in 2010;55:1936-42 BMS and DES

6-mo Taxus 9-mo Taxus 22-mo Taxus 48-mo BMS 57-mo BMS %NC 8% %NC 28% %NC 39% %NC 40% %NC 57% %DC 2% %DC 8% %DC 20% %DC 25% %DC 15% At the Maximal %IH Site Kang SJ et al. AJC 2010 ;106:1561-5

Neointimal Composition at Various FU Time 117 ISR Lesions (BMS and DES) with %IH>50% >36Mo (n=26) 52.2* 5.6* 27.2* 15.0* 24-36Mo (n=15) 54.9* 7.1 # 25.8* 12.2* 12-24Mo (n=12) 62.5 8.1 22.3 7.3 # 6-12Mo (n=42) 64.5 12.5 18.5 4.5 <6Mo (n=22) 67.2 15.4 14.6 2.8 Neoatherosclerosis degeneration increases intimal 0 20 40 60 80 100 (%) vulnerability with extended follow-up o period *p<0.01 01and # p<0.05, 05 vs. lesions at follow-up time <6 months Kang SJ et al. AJC 2010 ;106:1561-5

Neointima transforms into lipid-laden atherosclerotic tissue in late phase after BMS Lipid-laden intima frequently has intimal disruption, thrombi and neovascularization Takano et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;55:26-32

71 Year-Old Female 8YA Stable angina s/p BMS at prca and mlad 7YA mlad diffuse ISR triple anti-platelet Resting chest pain Unstable Angina

Virtual Histology gy

In-Stent Neoatherosclerosis OCT Analysis in 50 DES-ISR Lesions with %IH>50% Total Stable Unstable N=50 N=30 N=20 Follow-up p( (months) 32 (9-52) 14 (8-51) 41 (16-56) 0.178 Lipid neointima 45 (90%) 25 (83%) 20 (100%) 0.067 Fibrous cap thickness, µm 60 (50-162) 100 (60-205) 55 (42-105) 0.006006 Incidence of thrombi 29 (58%) 13 (43%) 16 (80%) 0.010 Incidence of red thrombi 7 (14%) 1(3%) 6 (30%) 0.012012 Incidence of rupture 29 (58%) 14 (47%) 15 (75%) 0.044 Incidence of TCFA 26 (52%) 11 (37%) 15 (75%) 0.008 Neovascularization 30 (60%) 15 (50%) 15 (75%) 0.069 Kang et al. Accepted in Circulation 2011 P

DES Follow-up >20 Months Best Cut-Off to Predict TCFA-Containing Neointima 100% 100 80% 80 40% 20% Sensitiv vity 60% 60 40 20 F/U time =20 Mo 0% <12 12-36 >36 No TCFA Single TCFA Multiple ( 2) (Months) 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 100-Specificity AUC=0 0.73 Sensitivity 75% Specificity 68% Kang et al. Accepted in Circulation 2011

TCFA-Containing Intima 100% 100% Neointimal Rupture 80% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 100% SA UA AMI Type of Thrombi None Single Multiple 100% 60% 40% 20% 0% SA UA AMI Longitudinal Extent 80% 80% 60% 60% 40% SA UA AMI No thrombi No thrombi White Red Mixed 40% <25% 25-75% >75% 20% 20% Various size and extent of thrombi, the degree of flow-limiting limiting 0% obstruction and acuteness may 0% determine the diversity AMC data SA UA AMI

SUMMARY In-stent neoatherosclerosis may increase neointimal vulnerability and contribute to the development of stent failure as one of causative mechanisms, especially late after stent t implantation ti