Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATO trial

Similar documents
Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATelet Inhibition and patient Outcomes trial

תרופות מעכבות טסיות חדשות ד"ר אלי לב מנהל שרות הצנתורים ח השרון מרכז רפואי רבין

Oral Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with ACS: A Focus on Prasugrel and Ticagrelor

Why and How Should We Switch Clopidogrel to Prasugrel?

Belinda Green, Cardiologist, SDHB, 2016

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

Prasugrel vs. Ticagrelor in ACS/PCI Which one to choose? V. Voudris MD FESC FACC 2 nd Cardiology Division Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center

New antiplatelets in NSTEMI. Overview: dual anti-platelet oral therapy

Impact of CYP2C19 and ABCB1 SNPs on outcomes with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes: a PLATO genetic substudy

Surveying the Landscape of Oral Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome Management

'Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndromes: perioperative strategies to improve outcome'

Oral anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy in the secondary prevention of ACS patients the cost of reducing death!

Optimal antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy for patients treated in STEMI network

QUT Digital Repository:

DOUBLE or TRIPLE ANTI-TROMBOTIC THERAPY in ACS. Maarten L Simoons Thoraxcenter - Erasmus MC Rotterdam - The Netherlands

Balancing Efficacy and Safety of P2Y12 Inhibitors for ACS Patients

OUTPATIENT ANTITHROMBOTIC MANAGEMENT POST NON-ST ELEVATION ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME. TARGET AUDIENCE: All Canadian health care professionals.

Which drug do you prefer for stable CAD? - P2Y12 inhibitor

ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club

Learning Objectives. Epidemiology of Acute Coronary Syndrome

GRAND ROUNDS - DILEMMAS IN ANTICOAGULATION AND ANTIPLATELET THERAPY. Nick Collins February 2017

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinically Significant Bleeding with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in ACS

TICAGRELOR VERSUS CLOPIDOGREL AFTER THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ST- ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Chest pain and troponins on the acute take. J N Townend Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham

Cangrelor: Is it the new CHAMPION for PCI? Robert Barcelona, PharmD, BCPS Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Cardiac Intensive Care Unit November 13, 2015

P 2 Y 12 Receptor Inhibitors

When and how to combine antiplatelet agents and anticoagulant?

Disclosures. Research consulting with: Sanofi-Regeneron Pfizer The Medicines Company Astra Zeneca

Διάρκεια διπλής αντιαιμοπεταλιακής αγωγής. Νικόλαος Γ.Πατσουράκος Καρδιολόγος, Επιμελητής Α ΕΣΥ Τζάνειο Γενικό Νοσοκομείο Πειραιά

Disclosures. Theodore A. Bass MD, FSCAI. The following relationships exist related to this presentation. None

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Lecture fees: AstraZeneca, Ely Lilly, Merck.

Non ST Elevation-ACS. Michael W. Cammarata, MD

Adults With Diagnosed Diabetes

ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΙΩΑΝΝΙΝΩΝ. Εξατοµικευµένη αντιαιµοπεταλιακή αγωγή. Ποιο είναι το µέλλον?

PRASUGREL HYDROCHLORIDE (Effient Eli Lilly Canada Inc.) Indication: Acute Coronary Syndrome

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 23 July 2014 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta317

Patient characteristics Intervention Comparison Length of followup

Update on Antiplatelet Therapy

Quale terapia antiaggregante nello STEMI? Prasugrel vs ticagrelor

Stephan Windecker Department of Cardiology Swiss Cardiovascular Center and Clinical Trials Unit Bern Bern University Hospital, Switzerland

Sheffield guidelines for the use of antiplatelets in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease (October 2017)

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 26 October 2011 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta236

Optimal Duration and Dose of Antiplatelet Therapy after PCI

Prasugrel: Son of Clopidogrel or Distant Cousin? Disclosures. Objectives

What is the Optimal Triple Anti-platelet Therapy Duration in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Drug-eluting Stents Implantation?

Session Objectives. Clopidogrel Resistance. Clopidogrel (Plavix )

The PARTHENON Clinical Development Program: the Role of Ticagrelor in Patients with Atherothrombotic Disease

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Cindy Baker, MD FACC Director Peripheral Vascular Interventions Division of Cardiovascular Medicine

INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE

ACS: What happens after the acute phase? Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD Leuven, Belgium

New insights in stent thrombosis: Platelet function monitoring. Franz-Josef Neumann Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen

Is the role of bivalirudin established?

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Made Practical

Role of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Hossam Kandil,, MD. Professor of Cardiology Cairo University

Ticagrelor. Platelet Inhibition and Beyond. Christian W. Hamm

Updated and Guideline Based Treatment of Patients with STEMI

P2Y 12 blockade. To load or not to load before the cath lab?

7 th Munich Vascular Conference

TRIAL UPDATE 1. ISAR TRIPLE SECURITY Trial. Dr Deven Patel Royal Free Hospital

UPDATES FROM THE 2018 ANTIPLATELET GUIDELINES

Antiplatelet Therapy: Current Recommendations for Choice of Agent and Concurrent Therapy with Warfarin and Novel Oral Anticoagulants

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

DATE: 06 June 2012 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES

Antiplatelet and Anti-Thrombotic Therapy. Ivan Anderson, MD RIHVH Cardiology

Adjunctive Antithrombotic for PCI. SCAI Fellows Course December 9, 2013

Supplementary Material to Mayer et al. A comparative cohort study on personalised

3/23/2017. Angelika Cyganska, PharmD Austin T. Wilson, MS, PharmD Candidate Europace Oct;14(10): Epub 2012 Aug 24.

Angelika Cyganska, PharmD Austin T. Wilson, MS, PharmD Candidate 2017

Optimal lenght of DAPT in different clinical scenarios

Otamixaban for non-st-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

Double-Dose Clopidogrel in ACS: The CURRENT/OASIS-7 Trial

Controversies in Cardiac Pharmacology

STEMI Presentation and Case Discussion. Case #1

SYNOPSIS. International co-ordinating investigator Redacted

Mortality. p =

Randomized Comparison of Prasugrel and Bivalirudin versus Clopidogrel and Heparin in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Clopidogrel Date: 15 July 2008

A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Immediate Versus Delayed Invasive Strategy in Patients with Non-ST Elevation ACS

Triple Therapy: A review of the evidence in acute coronary syndrome. Stephanie Kling, PharmD, BCPS Sanford Health

The following is a transcript from a multimedia activity. Interactivity applies only when viewing the activity online.

Robert Storey. Sheffield, United Kingdom

Asif Serajian DO FACC FSCAI

On admission Acute extensive anterior STEMI

Clopidogrel vs New Antiplatelet Therapy (Prasugrel) Adnan Kastrati, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität München, Germany

SCA ST- : recommandations européennes 2015 La durée de la bithérapie : à géométrie variable?

(ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT ) Title: The Italian Elderly ACS Study Author: Stefano Savonitto. Date: 29 August 2011 Meeting: ESC congress, Paris

Timing of Surgery After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Recognizing the High Risk NSTEMI Patient for Early Appropriate Therapy

Supplementary Online Content

Is there enough evidence for DAPT after endovascular intervention for PAOD?

Optimal Duration of Dual Anti- Platelet Therapy. December 19, 2015

Low Dose Rivaroxaban Versus Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 Inhibition, in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GEMINI-ACS-1)

Platelet function testing to guide P2Y 12 -inhibitor treatment in ACS patients after PCI: insights from a national program in Hungary

DIFFERENTIATING THE PATIENT WITH UNDIFFERENTIATED CHEST PAIN

1. Whether the risks of stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) differ from BMS and DES

bivalirudin 250mg powder for concentrate for solution for injection or infusion (Angiox) SMC No. (638/10) The Medicines Company

To provide information on the use of acetyl salicylic acid in the treatment and prevention of vascular events.

Clinical Seminar. Which Diabetic Patient is a Candidate for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - European Perspective

10 Steps to Managing Non-ST Elevation ACS

Transcription:

compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATO trial

August 30, 2009 at 08.00 CET

PLATO background In NSTE-ACS and STEMI, current guidelines recommend 12 months aspirin and clopidogrel Efficacy of clopidogrel is hampered by slow and variable transformation to the active metabolite modest and variable platelet inhibition increased risk of bleeding risk of stent thrombosis and MI in poor responders PLATO = PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes; NSTEMI = non-st segment elevation; STEMI = ST segment elevation; ACS = acute coronary syndromes; MI = myocardial infarction

(AZD 6140): an oral reversible P2Y 12 antagonist HO HO O N N N N N H N F is a cyclo-pentyltriazolo-pyrimidine (CPTP) S F OH Direct acting Not a prodrug; does not require metabolic activation Rapid onset of inhibitory effect on the P2Y 12 receptor Greater inhibition of platelet aggregation than clopidogrel Reversibly bound Degree of inhibition reflects plasma concentration Faster offset of effect than clopidogrel Functional recovery of all circulating platelets

PLATO study design NSTE-ACS (moderate-to-high risk) STEMI (if primary PCI) -treated or -naive; randomised within 24 hours of index event (N=18,624) If pre-treated, no additional loading dose; if naive, standard 300 mg loading dose, then 75 mg qd maintenance; (additional 300 mg allowed pre PCI) 180 mg loading dose, then 90 mg bid maintenance; (additional 90 mg pre-pci) 6 12-month exposure Primary endpoint: CV death + MI + Stroke Primary safety endpint: Total major bleeding PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; ASA = acetylsalicylic acid; CV = cardiovascular; TIA = transient ischaemic attack

PLATO inclusion criteria Hospitalisation for STEMI or NSTEMI ACS, with onset during the previous 24 hours With STEMI, the following two inclusion criteria were required Persistent STEMI or new LBBB Primary PCI planned With NSTEMI ACS, at least two of the following three were required ST-segment changes on ECG indicating ischaemia Positive biomarker indicating myocardial necrosis One of the following risk indicators 60 years of age Previous MI or CABG CAD with 50% stenosis in 2 vessels Previous ischaemic stroke, TIA, carotid stenosis ( 50%) Diabetes mellitus Peripheral artery disease Chronic renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance <60 ml/min) LBBB = left bundle branch block; ECG = elctrocardiogram; CABG = coronary artery bypass graft; CAD = coronary artery disease

Baseline and index event characteristics Characteristic (n=9,333) (n=9,291) Median age, years 62.0 62.0 Women, % 28.4 28.3 CV risk factors, % Habitual smoker Hypertension Dyslipidaemia Diabetes mellitus History, % Myocardial Infarction Percutaneous coronary intervention Coronary-artery bypass grafting ECG at entry, % Persistent ST-segment elevation ST-segment depression 36.0 65.8 46.6 24.9 20.4 13.6 5.7 37.5 50.7 35.7 65.1 46.7 25.1 20.7 13.1 6.2 37.8 51.2 Troponin-I positive, * % 85.3 86.0

Study medication Medication (n=9,333) (n=9,291) Start of randomised treatment Time after start of chest pain, h, median 11.3 11.3 Randomised treatment compliance, % Premature discontinuation of study drug 23.4 21.5 start-up, % in hospital before randomisation 46.0 46.1 Invasive procedures at index hospitalisation, % Planned invasive treatment Coronary angiography PCI during index hospitalisation Cardiac surgery 72.1 81.4 60.9 4.3 71.9 81.5 61.1 4.7

K-M estimate of time to first primary efficacy event (composite of CV death, MI or stroke) Cumulative incidence (%) 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.77 0.92), p=0.0003 11.7 9.8 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 No. at risk Days after randomisation 9,333 8,628 8,460 8,219 6,743 5,161 4,147 9,291 8,521 8,362 8,124 6,743 5,096 4,047 K-M = Kaplan-Meier; HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval

Primary efficacy endpoint over time (composite of CV death, MI or stroke) 8 8 Cumulative incidence (%) 6 4 2 5.43 4.77 Cumulative incidence (%) 6 4 2 6.60 5.28 0 HR 0.88 (95% CI 0.77 1.00), p=0.045 0 HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.70 0.91), p<0.001 No. at risk 0 10 20 30 Days after randomisation 9,333 8,942 8,827 8,763 31 90 150 210 270 330 Days after randomisation * 8,673 8,543 8,397 7,028 6,480 4,822 9,291 8,875 8,763 8,688 8,688 8,437 8,286 6,945 6,379 4,751 *Excludes patients with any primary event during the first 30 days

Hierarchical testing major efficacy endpoints All patients* (n=9,333) (n=9,291) HR for (95% CI) p value Primary objective, n (%) CV death + MI + stroke 864 (9.8) 1,014 (11.7) 0.84 (0.77 0.92) <0.001 Secondary objectives, n (%) Total death + MI + stroke 901 (10.2) 1,065 (12.3) 0.84 (0.77 0.92) <0.001 CV death + MI + stroke + ischaemia + TIA + arterial thrombotic events 1,290 (14.6) 1,456 (16.7) 0.88 (0.81 0.95) <0.001 Myocardial infarction 504 (5.8) 593 (6.9) 0.84 (0.75 0.95) 0.005 CV death 353 (4.0) 442 (5.1) 0.79 (0.69 0.91) 0.001 Stroke 125 (1.5) 106 (1.3) 1.17 (0.91 1.52) 0.22 Total death 399 (4.5) 506 (5.9) 0.78 (0.69 0.89) <0.001 The percentages are K-M estimates of the rate of the endpoint at 12 months.

Stent thrombosis (evaluated in patients with any stent during the study) (n=5,640) (n=5,649) HR (95% CI) p value Stent thrombosis, n (%) Definite 71 (1.3) 106 (1.9) 0.67 (0.50 0.91) 0.009 Probable or definite 118 (2.1) 158 (2.8) 0.75 (0.59 0.95) 0.02 Possible, probable, definite 155 (2.8) 202 (3.6) 0.77 (0.62 0.95) 0.01 *Time-at-risk is calculated from first stent insertion in the study or date of randomisation

Time to major bleeding primary safety event 15 K-M estimated rate (% per year) 10 5 0 HR 1.04 (95% CI 0.95 1.13), p=0.434 11.58 11.20 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 No. at risk Days from first IP dose 9,235 7,246 6,826 6,545 5,129 3,783 3,433 9,186 7,305 6,930 6,670 5,209 3,841 3,479

Total major bleeding K-M estimated rate (% per year) 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 11.6 NS 11.2 PLATO major bleeding 7.9 NS 7.7 TIMI major bleeding NS 8.9 8.9 Red cell transfusion * NS 5.8 5.8 PLATO lifethreatening/ fatal bleeding Clopidogre l NS 0.3 0.3 Fatal bleeding Major bleeding and major or minor bleeding according to TIMI criteria refer to non-adjudicated events analysed with the use of a statistically programmed analysis in accordance with definition described in Wiviott SD et al. NEJM 2007;357:2001 15; * Proportion of patients (%); NS = not significant

Non-CABG and CABG-related major bleeding K-M estimated rate (% per year) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 p=0.026 4.5 3.8 p=0.025 2.8 2.2 7.4 NS 7.9 5.3 NS 5.8 1 0 Non-CABG PLATO major bleeding Non-CABG TIMI major bleeding CABG PLATO major bleeding CABG TIMI major bleeding

Holter monitoring & Bradycardia related events Holter monitoring at first week (n=1,451) (n=1,415) p value Ventricular pauses 3 seconds, % 5.8 3.6 0.01 Ventricular pauses 5 seconds, % 2.0 1.2 0.10 Holter monitoring at 30 days (n= 985) (n=1,006) p value Ventricular pauses 3 seconds, % 2.1 1.7 0.52 Ventricular pauses 5 seconds, % 0.8 0.6 0.60 Bradycardia-related event, % (n=9,235) (n=9,186) p value Pacemaker Insertion 0.9 0.9 0.87 Syncope 1.1 0.8 0.08 Bradycardia 4.4 4.0 0.21 Heart block 0.7 0.7 1.00

Other findings All patients Dyspnoea, % (n=9,235) (n=9,186) p value * Any 13.8 7.8 <0.001 With discontinuation of study treatment 0.9 0.1 <0.001 Neoplasms arising during treatment, % Any 1.4 1.7 0.17 Malignant 1.2 1.3 0.69 Benign 0.2 0.4 0.02 *p values were calculated using Fischer s exact test

Other findings laboratory parameters All patients (n=9,235) (n=9,186) p value * % increase in creatinine from baseline At 1 month 10 ± 22 8 ± 21 <0.001 At 12 months 11 ± 22 9 ± 22 <0.001 Follow-up visit 10 ± 22 10 ± 22 0.59 % increase in uric acid from baseline At 1 month 14 ± 46 7 ± 44 <0.001 At 12 months 15 ± 52 7 ± 31 <0.001 Follow-up visit 7 ± 43 8 ± 48 0.56 Values are mean % ± SD; *p values were calculated using Fisher s exact test

Therapeutic considerations Based on 1,000 patients admitted to hospital for ACS, using ticagrelor instead of clopidogrel for 12 months resulted in 14 fewer deaths 11 fewer myocardial infarctions 6 8 fewer cases with stent thrombosis No increase in bleedings requiring transfusion 9 patients may switch to thienopyridine treatment because of reversible symptoms of dyspnoea Treating 54 patients with ticagrelor instead of with clopidogrel for one year will prevent one event of CV death, MI or stroke

Conclusions Reversible, more intense P2Y 12 receptor inhibition for one year with ticagrelor in comparison with clopidogrel in a broad population with ST- and non-st-elevation ACS provides Reduction in myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis Reduction in cardiovascular and total mortality No change in the overall risk of major bleeding is a more effective alternative than clopidogrel for the continuous prevention of ischaemic events, stent thrombosis and death in the acute and long-term treatment of patients with ACS