Effect of Swallowing Function After ROI-C Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion

Similar documents
ACDF. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. An introduction to

SpineFAQs. Cervical Disc Replacement

Key Primary CPT Codes: Refer to pages: 7-9 Last Review Date: October 2016 Medical Coverage Guideline Number:

Original Article Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2013;5:

Swallowing Function Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With and Without Anterior Plating: A SWAL-QOL and Radiographic Assessment

Patient Information MIS LLIF. Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Int J Clin Exp Med 2016;9(11): /ISSN: /IJCEM

Zero-profile Anchored Spacer Reduces Rate of Dysphagia Compared With ACDF With Anterior Plating

EFSPINE CERVICAL COMBINED SET DISC PROTHESIS ORGANIZER BOX

The application of zero-profile anchored spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

ProDisc-C versus fusion with Cervios chronos prosthesis in cervical degenerative disc disease: Is there a difference at 12 months?

Comprehension of the common spine disorder.

Anterior Cervical Fusion: What is the Effect on Swallow Function?

/ 66 nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 n-ha/pa66

Zongyu Zhang 1, Yawei Li 2 and Weimin Jiang 1*

Long term prognosis of young adults after ACDF

Patient Information MIS LLIF. Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

DEGENERATIVE SPINAL DISEASE PRABIN SHRESTHA ANISH M SINGH B&B HOSPITAL

Fixation of multiple level anterior cervical disc using cages versus cages and plating

CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS & CERVICAL DISC DISEASE

Cervical corpectomy for sub-axial retro-vertebral body lesions

A Patient s Guide to Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement

Original Article Application of Zero-P on anterior cervical decompression and bone fusion

Patient Information ACDF. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Int J Clin Exp Med 2018;11(2): /ISSN: /IJCEM Yi Yang, Hao Liu, Yueming Song, Tao Li

Cervical Motion Preservation

Cervical Degenerative Disease - Surgical Approaches to CSM 가톨릭의대인천성모병원척추센터 김종태

Anterior cervical diskectomy icd 10 procedure code

Case Report Two-year follow-up results of artificial disc replacement C7-T1

Comparative study on the effect of anterior and posterior decompression in the treatment of multi-segmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy

POSTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION

Subaxial Cervical Spine Trauma Dr Hesarikia BUMS

Surgical Technique INTERSOMATIC CERVICAL CAGE

PARADIGM SPINE. Patient Information. Treatment of a Narrow Lumbar Spinal Canal

Case Report Two-year follow-up results of C2/3 Prestige-LP cervical disc replacement: first report

Comparison among perfect-c, zero-p, and plates with a cage in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease

PARADIGM SPINE. Anterior Cervical Fusion Cage. Cervical Interbody Fusion

Spine Surgery: Techniques, Complication Avoidance, and Management. 2 Volume Set

Objectives. Comprehension of the common spine disorder

Replacement Code for Interbody Cage for Disc

Systematic review Cervical artificial disc replacement versus fusion in the cervical spine: a systematic review (...)

Mitsuhiro Hashimto 1), Masashi Yamazaki 2), Macondo Mochizuki 3), Masatsune Yamagata 1), Yoshikazu Ikeda 1), Fumitake Nakajima 1)

3D titanium interbody fusion cages sharx. White Paper

Original Date: October 2015 LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION FOR

Induction and Maintenance of Lordosis in MultiLevel ACDF Using Allograft. Saad Khairi, MD Jennifer Murphy Robert S. Pashman, MD

Innovative Techniques in Minimally Invasive Cervical Spine Surgery. Bruce McCormack, MD San Francisco California

Cervical artificial disc replacement versus fusion in the cervical spine: a systematic review comparing multilevel versus single-level surgery

Early Radiological Analysis of Cervical Arthroplasty with Bryan and Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis

Original Article Application of structural autologous cervical laminae as bone graft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Patient Information MIS TLIF. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery

Spinal canal stenosis Degenerative diseases F 06

ProDisc-L Total Disc Replacement. IDE Clinical Study.

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield Central Region Clinical Claim Edit

ORIGINAL PAPER. Department of Orthopedic Surgery,Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine,Nagoya,Japan 2

ELY ASHKENAZI Israel Spine Center at Assuta Hospital Tel Aviv, Israel

Spinal Fusion. North American Spine Society Public Education Series

Outcomes and revision rates following multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Comparing anterior cervical fusion using titanium cage with hydroxyapatite and with autograft

Artificial Intervertebral Disc Replacement - Cervical

Interspinous Fusion Devices. Midterm results. ROME SPINE 2012, 7th International Meeting Rome, 6-7 December 2012

Cervical Spine Surgery: Approach related outcome

Medical Policy Original Effective Date: Revised Date: Page 1 of 11

) ACDF. (Japanese Orthopaedic Association,JOA) ACCF (175.4±12.1ml VS 201.3±80.4ml) ACDF JOA VAS (P=0.000),ACCF :A : X(2015)

CERVICAL PROCEDURES PHYSICIAN CODING

Adjacent Segment Degeneration Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus the Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty

Artificial Intervertebral Disc: Cervical Spine

Post Operative Care Following Spinal Surgery For A Cervical Herniated Disc

2016 OPAM Mid-Year Educational Conference, sponsored by AOCOPM Thursday, March 10, 2016 C-1

Patient Information MIS TLIF. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

U.S. MARKET FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANTS

Artificial Intervertebral Disc: Cervical Spine. Description

PROCEDURES WE PERFORM

nvp Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion System

nvt Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion System

Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

If you have a condition that compresses your nerves, causing debilitating back pain or numbness along the back of your leg.

Surgery in cervical disc herniation: anterior cervical discectomy without fusion or with fusion

nva Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion System

The Artificial Cervical Disc: 2016 update

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Imaging of Orthopedic Spinal Devices: What Every Radiologist Should Know.

Degenerative spondylolisthesis at the L4 L5 in a 32-year-old female with previous fusion for idiopathic scoliosis: A case report

Interbody fusion cage for the transforaminal approach. Travios. Surgical Technique

Artificial Intervertebral Disc: Cervical Spine

OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE. CONSTRUX Mini PTC. Mini PTC Spacer System

MAS TLIF MAXIMUM ACCESS SURGERY TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION AN INTRODUCTION TO

Biomechanics of Interspinous Process Fixation and Lateral Modular Plate Fixation to Support Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF)

Treatment of Two Level Artificial Disc Replacement for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

MRI Measurement of Neuroforaminal Dimension at the Index and Supradjacent Levels after Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Study

Mobi-C Cervical Disc Two Contiguous Levels Patient Education

Stand-Alone Technology. Reginald Davis, M.D., FAANS, FACS Director of Clinical Research

RETROLISTHESIS. Retrolisthesis. is found mainly in the cervical spine and lumbar region but can also be often seen in the thoracic spine

PART III IN HOSPITAL ON CALL ANESTHESIA COVERAGE

SpineFAQs. Neck Pain Diagnosis and Treatment

Artificial Disc Replacement, Cervical

PILLAR AL. Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) and Partial Vertebral Body Replacement (pvbr) PEEK Spacer System OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE

EVALUATE, TREAT AND WHEN TO REFER RED FLAGS Mid Atlantic Occupational Regional Conference and Environmental Medicine October 6, 2018

DISCLOSURES. Goal of Fusion. Expandable Cages: Do they play a role in lumbar MIS surgery? CON 2/15/2017

Transcription:

Journal of Surgery 2016; 4(6): 141-145 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/js doi: 10.11648/j.js.20160406.14 ISSN: 2330-0914 (Print); ISSN: 2330-0930 (Online) Effect of Swallowing Function After ROI-C Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Guowei Zhang, Zhaohui Chen, Qiuling Liu, Zhisheng Ji, Chunhai Lan, Hongsheng Lin * Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China Email address: tlinhsh@jnu.edu.cn (Hongsheng Lin) * Corresponding author To cite this article: Guowei Zhang, Zhaohui Chen, Qiuling Liu, Zhisheng Ji, Chunhai Lan, Hongsheng Lin. Effect of Swallowing Function After ROI-C Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion. Journal of Surgery. Vol. 4, No. 6, 2016, pp. 141-145. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20160406.14 Received: December 22, 2016; Accepted: January 3, 2017; Published: January 21, 2017 Abstract: The difference of swallowing function between a new zero-notch anterior cervical interbody fusion device (ROI-C) and classical method with the plate using in anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) were discussed and analyzed. 57 cases in the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University from Feb 2013 to Mar 2016 who underwent ACDF were retrospectively reviewed. There were 33 cases in group using with ROI-C and 24 cases in group using with plate. The difference of dysphagia incidence and severity were analyzed by comparing with the image data before and after operation. The dysphagia correlative risk factors analyzed by logistic regression test were internal fixation material and thickness of 3-days post-operative prevertebral soft tissue (PST). When the PST (3-days post-operative) was larger than 10.44mm, the chance of developing postoperative was significantly greater. The thickness of 3-days post-operative PST in ROI-C group was significantly lower than that in plate group (P <0.05). The thickness of 3-days post-operative PST swelling width ROI-C group was significantly lower than that in plate group (P <0.05). The index of 3-days post-operative PST was lower but no significant in ROI-C group than that of group Plate (P >0.05). 3-days post-operation, the dysphagia incidence and severity were significantly lower in ROI-C group than that in plate group (P <0.05). The dysphagia correlative risk factors are internal fixation material and thickness of 3-days post-operative PST. When the 3-days post-operative PST larger than 10.44 mm, the chance of developing postoperative is significantly greater. Zero-notch ROI-C anterior cervical interbody fusion device is associated with less stimulations to esophagus, lower postoperative dysphagia incidence, milder severity of dysphagia and shorter period of dysphagia in ACDF. Keywords: Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion, Thickness of Prevertebral Soft Tissue, Dysphagia 1. Introduction Anterior cervical discectomy (decompression) and fusion (ACDF) is a prior method for the treatment of many cervical vertebrae diseases, such as degeneration, congenital malformations, pathological and traumatic fractures [1]. However, complications, including hematoma formation, infection, failure of internal fixation, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, esophageal injury, vertebral artery and nerve injury, have been reported [2]. Especially, dysphagia caused by esophageal injury after the surgery is particularly prominent. Accordingly, the early postoperative swallowing dysfunction rate is about 1%-80%, and also there are about 3%-21% of patients with long-term dysphagia symptoms [3-5]. The mechanisms of dysphagia remain to be elucidated, while the most acceptable hypothesis is due to the postoperative soft tissue swelling [6-9]. In the current study, we measured the thickness of anterior soft tissue by postoperative cervical X-ray film, aiming to investigate the impact of ACDF with zero- notch ROI-C on dysphagia. Comparing to patients on ACDF with anterior plate fixation, we tried to determine role of the thickness of anterior soft tissue in dysphagia, trying to provide evidences to reduce complications of ACDF. 2. Methods 2.1. General Data From Feb 2013 to Mar 2016, 57 patients (27 male, 30

Journal of Surgery 2016; 4(6): 141-145 142 female) under ACDF were included and subjected for retrospective analysis. By the difference of internal implantation device, patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) 33 cases of ROI-C group (zero-notch device, 13 male and 20 female); age, 27-77 years old (average 51.97±11.34 years old); follow-up time, 5-17 months (average 10.72±4.86 months); (2) 24 cases of Titanium (Ti) plate group (combined anterior intervertebral fusion device, 14 male and 10 female); age, 39-84 (average 52.63±11.67); follow-up time, 1.5-22 months (average 10.26±8.88 months). 2.2. Inclusion Criteria Patients with the following characters were included: (1) confirmed diagnosis of cervical degenerative lesion, with instability caused by fractures or spondylolisthesis; (2) symptoms matched the corresponding segment indicated by X-ray, CT and MR; (3) Imaging suggest the lesion located between C3-T1, 1 to 3 segments requiring decompression; (4) cervical spondylotic radiculopathy patients treated by none surgical methods showed no significant improvement, still with obvious symptoms of spinal cord nerve compression; (5) with complete medical records, non-mental illness patients; (6) no dysphagia symptoms before surgery. 2.3. Exclusion Criteria Patients with the following characters were excluded: (1) with dysphagia symptoms before surgery; (2) esophageal cervical spondylosis or imaging indicated that huge osteophyte formation at the anterior edge of the lesion segment (height > 16 mm) [9]; (3) with spinal cord compression by serious ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament, ankylosing spondylitis, deformity and tumor; (4) combined with mental illness and severe osteoporosis; (5) other factors affect swallowing function during the follow-up: developmental abnormalities, CNS diseases, tumor metastasis/compression, severe trauma, cervical revision surgery, esophageal injury (physical/chemical /biological). 2.4. Measurements Imagines were measured by Huahai HiNet PACS medical image inspection system (images were enlarged 5x, each index was measured twice and was averaged to reduce errors). Penning method [8] was used to measure the prevertebral soft tissue thickness (PST) of C3-7 vertebrae in the cervical spine (Figure 1). For those with obvious osteophyte formation at the anterior edge of the lesion segment (osteophyte height > 5 mm) [9]. The degree of PST swelling width equals post-operative PST minus pre-operative PST. The PST index of prevertebral soft tissue equals cervical PST/ Vertebral sagittal diameter. Degrees of dysphagia were shown in Table 1 [4]. Table 1. Bazaz-Yoo Dysphagia Score. Severity Symptoms Liquid Solid None None None Mild None Rare Moderate None or rare Occasionally (only with specific food) Severe None or rare Frequent (majority of food) Figure 1. (A) Measurement of PST in ROI-C group: distances of C3, C5-7 vertebral anterior edge, C4 certebral anterior superior edge to posterior trachea, get the average value as the horizontal PST.(B) Measurement of PST in titanium plate group: the distance between the front border of plate to posterior trachea.

143 Guowei Zhang et al.: Effect of Swallowing Function After ROI-C Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion 2.5. Statistical Analysis Data were analyzed by SPSS 19.00, dependent t-tests and Pearson correlations were used when comparing measures between the two groups. P < 0.05 means statistical significant differences. 3. Results We compared the PST, swelling width of PST, PST index between the ROI-C group and the Titanium plate group in 3-days, 6-weeks post-operation and the last follow-up. We found that the values of PST 3-days after operation between the two groups showed significant differences (P < 0.05), while values of 6 weeks post-operation and the last follow-up showed no significant differences (P > 0.05). PST values in ROI-C group were lower than that in Ti plate group (Figure 2A). The swelling width of PST in 3-days post-operation and the last follow-up showed significant difference (P < 0.05, Figure 2B). The PST index showed no difference in both groups (Figure 2C). We got the average PST value of 10.44 mm for the threshold value and found that 3-days post-operation, if PST value larger than this average value, the rate of dysphagia was higher than that with lower PST value (< 10.44) (Figure 2D). Figure 2. PST values (A), swelling width of PST (B) and PST index (C) in the ROI-C and plate groups were shown. The relationship of PST threshold and dysphagia. Figure 3. The linear regression for risk factor analysis. The relationship of 3-days post-operative PST values and dysphagia (A) and severity of dysphagia (B) were shown.

Journal of Surgery 2016; 4(6): 141-145 144 Furthermore, we calculated the rate of dysphagia (Table 2). We than analyzed the risk factor of dysphagia. Logistic analyses were performed with potential risk factors including sex, age and implant material, measures of 3 days post-operation (PST, swelling width of PST, PST index). As shown in Table 3, the results showed that the risk factors were implant material and 3-days post-operative PST values. A linear relationship was shown between 3-days post-operative PST value with the dysphagia (Figure 3A) and with dysphagia severity (Figure 3B). Table 2. The rate of dysphagia in two groups. Severity Rate (Cases) ROI-C group (33 cases) Ti Plate group (24 cases) None 90.9% (12 male, 18 female ) 50.0% (9 male, 3 female) Mild 9.1% (1 male, 2 female) 25.0% (3 mal, 3 female) Moderate 0 25.0% (2 male, 4 female) Severe 0 0 Table 3. Multiple factor analysis of pharyngeal difficulty. Risk factor B P Exp (B) OR 95.0% C. I. for EXP (B) Lower Upper Internal fix device (ROI-C, plate) 1.391 0.006 4.017 1.491 10.823 3 days post-operative PST 0.172 0.011 1.187 1.041 1.354 4. Discussion As a mature anterior cervical surgery method, ACDF is applied for degenerative cervical disc herniation with confirmed symptoms of spinal cord and/or nerve root, those non-surgical method cannot alleviate [1]. Because of the effective outcome, ACDF is widely recognized and applied in clinical practice. However, the use of anterior steel plate widens the narrow anterior gap, thus compresses the esophagus leading to the dysphagia. Accordingly, the rate of post-operative dysphagia differs, statistically early dysphagia ranging from 1% to 80%, chronic dysphagia 3%-21% [3-5]. The detailed mechanisms of post-operative dysphagia remain to be elucidated, while the hypothesis of post-operative soft tissue swelling is more acceptable. Suk and the colleagues suggested that due to the operation, anterior soft tissues congested and hematoma formed, the anterior usage of steel plate further stimulate the soft tissues, increasing the PST thickness, the esophagus becomes narrow due to the pressure, and finally leading to dysphagia [6]. Compared with Ti steel plate, the ROI-C fusion system is much simpler with no anterior steel implant. Hacker-Gilbert and the colleagues found that simple interbody fusion and artificial disc replacement would not lead to dysphagia, with lower rate of dysphagia than Ti steel [7]. Hofstetter and the colleagues found that another zero-notch cage (Zero-P) also can decrease the post-operative dysphagia [10]. Our results showed that the application of ROI-C cage lead to the reduced dysphagia rate and severity, than Ti plate group, which is consistent with previous reports. In general, we identified the risk factor for the happening of post-operative dysphagia; and found that when 3-days post-operative PST value was large than 10.44 mm, the risk would increase. The application of ROI-C device in ACDF show good clinical outcome with smaller degree of anterior soft tissue swelling postoperatively, no compression to the esophagus, lower effect to swallowing function, showing the advantages of lower rate of dysphagia and lower severity and short duration. 5. Conclusion (1) Plate implanting and 3-days post-operative PST value are risk factors for post-operative dysphagia in ACDF. (2) When 3-days post-operative PST value is larger than 10.44 mm, the risk of post-operative dysphagia increases. (3) The application of zero-notch devices like ROI-C reduced dysphagia rate and severity. Acknowledgments The authors declare no conflict of interests. This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2014A030313357), the National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People s Republic of China (No. W2013ZT083) and Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (A2016038). References [1] Denaro, V. and A. Di Martino, Cervical spine surgery: an historical perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469 (3): 639-48. [2] Bednar, D. A. and W. Al-Tunaib, Failure of reconstitution of open-section, posterior iliac-wing bone graft donor sites after lumbar spinal fusion. Observations with implications for the etiology of donor site pain. Eur Spine J, 2005, 14 (1): 95-8. [3] Riley, L. H., 3rd, A. R. Vaccaro, J. R. Dettori, and R. Hashimoto, Postoperative dysphagia in anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35 (9 Suppl): S76-85. [4] Lee, M. J., R. Bazaz, C. G. Furey, and J. Yoo, Influence of anterior cervical plate design on Dysphagia: a 2-year prospective longitudinal follow-up study. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2005, 18 (5): 406-9. [5] Baron, E. M., A. M. Soliman, J. P. Gaughan, L. Simpson, and W. F. Young, Dysphagia, hoarseness, and unilateral true vocal fold motion impairment following anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2003, 112 (11): 921-6.

145 Guowei Zhang et al.: Effect of Swallowing Function After ROI-C Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion [6] Suk, K. S., K. T. Kim, S. H. Lee, and S. W. Park, Prevertebral soft tissue swelling after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation. Int Orthop, 2006, 30 (4): 290-4. [7] Hacker, R. J., J. C. Cauthen, T. J. Gilbert, and S. L. Griffith, A prospective randomized multicenter clinical evaluation of an anterior cervical fusion cage. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2000, 25 (20): 2646-54; discussion 2655. [8] Dai, L. Y. and L. S. Jia, Radiographic measurement of the prevertebral soft tissue of cervical vertebrae. Chin Med J (Engl), 1994, 107 (6): 471-3. [9] Yue, W. M., W. Brodner, and T. R. Highland, Persistent swallowing and voice problems after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating: a 5- to 11-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J, 2005, 14 (7): 677-82. [10] Hofstetter, C. P., K. Kesavabhotla, and J. A. Boockvar, Zero-profile Anchored Spacer Reduces Rate of Dysphagia Compared With ACDF With Anterior Plating. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2015, 28 (5): E284-90.