NCCN AND AUA GUIDELINES FOR RCC:

Similar documents
RENAL CANCER. Dr. Giandomenico Roviello. Oncologia Medica Ospedale San Donato Arezzo

Canadian Urological Association guidelines for followup of patients after treatment of nonmetastatic

Focal Ablative Therapies for Kidney Cancer

GUIDELINES ON RENAL CELL CANCER

Who are Candidates for Laparoscopic or Open Radical Nephrectomy. Arieh Shalhav

Indications For Partial

Vincenzo Ficarra. Direttore Clinica di Urologia Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Udine

Management of Locally Reccurent Renal Cell Carcinoma. Jose A. Karam, MD, FACS Assistant Professor Department of Urology

Key Words: kidney; carcinoma, renal cell; renal insufficiency; nephrectomy; mortality

RAPN. in T1b Renal Masses? A. Mottrie. G. Denaeyer, P. Schatteman, G. Novara

Patient Selection for Surgery in RCC with Thrombus. E. Jason Abel, M.D.

Surveillance Strategies in Kidney Cancer: When is Enough? Role of Survivorship Clinic in Long-Term Follow-Up of Kidney Cancer

Lymphadenectomy in RCC: Yes, No, Clinical Trial?

Section Activity Activity Description Details Reference(s)

Overall Survival and Development of Stage IV Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients Undergoing Partial and Radical Nephrectomy for Benign Renal Tumors

SAMPLING OF POST NEPHRECTOMY CANCER CARE (5)

Optimal Treatment of ct1b Renal Mass in Patient with Normal GFR: a Role for Radical Nephrectomy?

EUROPEAN UROLOGY 60 (2011)

ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR RENAL MASSES: Where are we in 2016?

Cytoreductive Nephrectomy

Renal Mass Biopsy: Needed Now More than Ever

MARK S. SHIMKO, M.D. Chesapeake Urology Associates, LLC

WHAT IS THE ROLE OF ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE

Tumor necrosis is a strong predictor for recurrence in patients with pathological T1a renal cell carcinoma

Research Article Multifocal Renal Cell Carcinoma: Clinicopathologic Features and Outcomes for Tumors 4cm

Date Modified: March 31, Clinical Quality Measures for PQRS

Contemporary Role of Renal Mass Biopsy

Alicia K. Morgans, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of Hematology/Oncology Vanderbilt University Medical Center January 24, 2015

Attachment #2 Overview of Follow-up

Surgical Management of Metastatic and Locally Recurrent Kidney Cancer: Does it Make Sense?

Prediction of complications after partial nephrectomy by RENAL nephrometry score

Renal Pelvis Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Renal Cell Carcinoma in a Tuberculous Kidney

Neoadjuvant vs. Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Date Modified: May 29, Clinical Quality Measures for PQRS

R-SCAN: Engaging Clinicians in Value-based Care

Follow-up imaging after nephrectomy for cancer in Canada: urologists compliance with guidelines. An observational study

Objectives. Patients and Methods. Conclusion. Keywords. Results. Introduction

Vincenzo Ficarra 1,2,3. Associate Editor BJU International

Management of High Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma

ELECTIVE PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR T1B RCC. Vitaly Margulis MD. Associate Professor of Urology

Challenges in RCC surgery. Treatment Goals. Surgical challenges. Management options in VHL associated RCCs

MR-US Fusion Guided Biopsy: Is it fulfilling expectations?

Percutaneous Renal Cryoablation After Partial Nephrectomy: Technical Feasibility, Complications and Outcomes

AUA Guidelines Renal Mass and Localized Kidney Cancer

RCC in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs): Diagnosis and Management

When to Integrate Surgery for Metatstatic Urothelial Cancers

Focal Therapy is a Fool s Paradise : The whole prostate must be treated!

Adam Raben M.D. Helen F Graham Cancer Center

VALUE AND ROLE OF PSA AS A TUMOUR MARKER OF RESPONSE/RELAPSE

Treatment of Patients With Small Renal Masses: A Survey of the American Urological Association

Partial versus radical nephrectomy for pt1a renal cancer in Serbia

Comparison of Partial and Radical Nephrectomy for pt1b Renal Cell Carcinoma

Long-Term Risk of Clinical Progression After Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy: The Impact of Time from Surgery to Recurrence

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, INDIA. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Medical Oncology, and Radiology

Controversies in the management of Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Penile Implant Should be Offered Early

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters

Surgeons Perspective: LN as a Draining Pattern. Jose A. Karam, MD, FACS Associate Professor Department of Urology

Attachment #2 Overview of Follow-up

Is renal cryoablation becoming an effective alternative to partial nephrectomy?

Financial and Other Disclosures

Complex case Presentations

PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA TREATED WITH CHEMOTHERAPY

RENAL CANCER GUIDELINES

EUROPEAN UROLOGY 61 (2012)

10/11/2018. Clinical and Surgical Management of VHL-Related Cysts and Cystic RCC. Outline. VHL Renal Manifestations. VHL Renal Manifestations

REAL WORLD PRACTICE: ADJUVANT THERAPY READY FOR PRIME TIME? PRO

What is the role of partial nephrectomy in the context of active surveillance and renal ablation?

Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy- the current gold standard

Multidisciplinary approach for renal cell carcinoma Axel Bex, MD, PhD The Netherlands Cancer Institute

Detection to Prediction: Imaging Markers of Breast Cancer Risk

Urinary Collecting System Invasion is an Independent Prognostic. Factor in Organ Confined Renal Cell Carcinomas.

I mportant prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)

Financial and Other Disclosures

Surgery of Renal Cell Carcinoma Axel Bex, MD, PhD The Netherlands Cancer Institute

Diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous renal tumor biopsy May 10 th 2018

Medical Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma

Post Partial Nephrectomy Surveillance Imaging: an Evidence-Based Approach

Case Report Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastatic to Thyroid Gland, Presenting Like Anaplastic Carcinoma of Thyroid

SBRT for lung metastases: Case report

Comparison of Long-Term Results After Nephron-Sparing Surgery and Radical Nephrectomy in Treating 4- to 7-cm Renal Cell Carcinoma

oth percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation have shown favorable local tumor

How do I control (monitor) patients receiving TRT after prostate cancer treatment

Health Screening Update: Prostate Cancer Zamip Patel, MD FSACOFP Convention August 1 st, 2015

ablativi Vincenzo Ficarra Direttore Clinica di Urologia Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Udine

RCC in ADPKD / CKD / ESRD

Role and extension of lymph node dissection in kidney, bladder and prostate cancer. Omar Ghanem (PGY3 ) Moderator: Dr A. Noujem 30 th March 2017

Critical Evaluation of Early Post-operative Single Instillation Therapy in NMIBC

Partial Nephrectomy: Does Ischemia Matter?

Personalized Therapy for Prostate Cancer due to Genetic Testings

BJUI. Active surveillance of small renal masses offers short-term oncological efficacy equivalent to radical and partial nephrectomy

Sommerakademie Munich, June

Impact of lymphadenectomy in management of renal cell carcinoma

BCG Unresponsive Disease A Roadmap for Drug Development and Integra;on of Novel Therapies

Renal cancer in adults

Laparoscopic Surgery. The Da Vinci Robot. Limits of Laparoscopy. What Robotics Offers. Robotic Urologic Surgery: A New Era in Patient Care

High Intensity Focused Ultrasounds for the treatment of Prostate Cancers Clinical update November D. Maruzzi - L. Ruggera

St. Dominic s Annual Cancer Report Outcomes

Carcinoma renale (I): Posters Review. Elena Verzoni Oncologia Medica 1 SS.Oncologia Genitourinaria Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori Milano

Uro-Assiut 2015 Robotic Nephron Sparing Surgery

Transcription:

NCCN AND AUA GUIDELINES FOR RCC: DO THEY EFFECTIVELY CAPTURE RECURRENCES FOLLOWING NEPHRECTOMY? Suzanne B. Stewart, MD 1, R. Houston Thompson, MD 1, Sarah P. Psutka, MD 1, John C. Cheville, MD 2, Christine M. Lohse 3, Stephen A. Boorjian, MD 1, Bradley C. Leibovich, MD 1 1 Department of Urology, 2 Department of Pathology, 3 Department of Health Sciences Research Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 2013 MFMER slide-1

Background Multiple protocols exist for the oncologic surveillance of RCC NCCN and AUA guidelines are highly recognized Protocols are disparate No definitive evidence to clarify which is the most efficacious 1,2 As a result Significant heterogeneity in surveillance care 3 Over and underutilization of testing for certain patient groups 1 Skolarikos A et al. Eur Urol. 2007; 2 Chin AI et al. Rev Urol. 2006; 3 Feuerstein MA et al. SUO 2013. 2013 MFMER slide-2

Objectives 1. Evaluate the performance of the NCCN and AUA guidelines How many RCC recurrences are detected when abiding by prescribed protocols 2. Summarize the total duration of surveillance required to capture 90%, 95% and 100% of RCC recurrences 2013 MFMER slide-3

Guideline Protocol NCCN (2013) all patients 6 months for abdominal/chest sites 5yrs for bone/other sites AUA stratified by stage and surgical approach LR-partial (pt1n0): 3yrs for all sites LR-radical (pt1n0): 1yr for abdominal and 3yrs for chest/bone/other sites M/HR (>pt2 or N+): 5yrs for all sites 2013 MFMER slide-4

Methods Retrospective review of Mayo Clinic Renal Tumor Registry between 1970-2008 N = 3, 803 M0 RCC radical/partial nephrectomy Median postoperative follow-up 9yrs (IQR 5.7, 14.4) Mayo surveillance strategy: Exam, chest/abdominal imaging, labs: 3-6 months x 3yrs 6-12 months x 2yrs annually 2013 MFMER slide-5

Methods Disease recurrence = local recurrence or metastasis on imaging or by biopsy > 30d from surgery Only first recurrence counted as an event 1088 (29.8%) developed recurrence Median time to recurrence 1.9yrs (IQR 0.6, 5.5; range 0.1, 38) Patients were stratified according to: Recurrence location: abdomen, chest, bone and other 2013 MFMER slide-6

Number of recurrences captured by the NCCN and AUA prescribed surveillance periods Number of recurrences captured (%) By AUA Risk Group By Recurrence Location Guideline NCCN AUA Total N = 1088 390 (35.9) 728 (66.9) LRpartial N = 94 12 (12.8) 35 (37.2) LRradical N = 190 46 (24.2) 56 (29.5) M/HR N = 804 332 (41.3) 637 (79.3) Abdomen N = 437 84 (19.2) 256 (58.6) Chest N = 442 128 (29.0) 324 (73.3) Bone N = 166 133 (80.1) 127 (76.5) Other N = 158 106 (67.1) 99 (62.6) Approximately 2/3 rd and 1/3 rd of recurrences were missed by NCCN and AUA Most restrictive for low risk patients and capturing abdominal relapses 2013 MFMER slide-7

2013 vs 2014 NCCN Guidelines 2013 NCCN all patients 6 months for abdominal/chest sites 5yrs for bone/other sites 2014 NCCN stratified by stage and surgical approach pt1nx/0: 3yrs for chest and 5 yrs bone/other sites partial Nx: 3yrs for abdomen radical Nx: 1yr for abdomen pt2-3nx/0 or pt1-3n1: 5yrs for all sites pt4nx-1: Indefinite 2013 MFMER slide-8

Table 1. Number of recurrences captured by the 2013 and 2014 NCCN and AUA prescribed surveillance periods Number of recurrences captured (%) By AUA Risk Group By Recurrence Location Guideline 2013 NCCN 2014 NCCN AUA Total N = 1088 390 (35.9) 742 (68.2) 728 (66.9) LRpartial N = 94 12 (12.8) 36 (38.3) 35 (37.2) LRradical N = 190 46 (24.2) 67 (35.3) 56 (29.5) M/HR N = 804 332 (41.3) 639 (79.5) 637 (79.3) Abdomen N = 437 84 (19.2) 258 (59.0) 256 (58.6) Chest N = 442 128 (29.0) 326 (73.8) 324 (73.3) Bone N = 166 133 (80.1) 134 (80.7) 127 (76.5) Other N = 158 106 (67.1) 106 (67.1) 99 (62.6) 2013 MFMER slide-9

Figure 1. Total duration of surveillance to capture 90%, 95%, and 100% of recurrences A longer duration of surveillance appears necessary Caption: *Estimated duration of surveillance due to the few recurrences in these groups. 2013 MFMER slide-10

Limitations Retrospective design Mayo Clinic follow-up was not standardized < 3% were lost to follow-up No strong evidence that surveillance survival benefit Despite this unknown, surveillance continues to remain an integral part of RCC care 2013 MFMER slide-11

Conclusions First large scale study to evaluate NCCN and AUA guidelines for RCC Do not comprehensively capture recurrences Approximately 2/3 rd (2013 NCCN) and 1/3 rd (AUA and 2014 NCCN) of all recurrences are missed A longer duration of follow-up appears necessary 2013 MFMER slide-12

Thank You 2013 MFMER slide-13