Prepared by. SpotlIght. Driving Under the Influence: Students in College. Brought to you by

Similar documents
DUI Offender Survey Report 2008

ATOD Conference - April 3, 2014

REPORT 03. Alcohol Use Among Community College Students

ALCOHOL USE 2011 SURVEY RESULTS REPORT AND RELATED BEHAVIORS. Figure 1 n Trends in current alcohol use, Grades 9 12, New Mexico,

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

El Dorado County 2010

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Santa Clara County 2010

Riverside County 2010

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

San Francisco County 2010

Mendocino County 2010

San Bernardino County 2010

Women and Substance Abuse in Nevada. A Special Report

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities

San Luis Obispo County 2010

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

REVISED. Stanislaus County 2007

Alcohol Use and Related Behaviors

Contra Costa County 2010

Mallie J. Paschall, Ph.D. Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation Oakland, CA

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Alcohol. Gordon Smith, MD (MB, ChB Otago), MPH Professor University of Maryland National Study Center for Trauma and EMS

Stanislaus County 2010

San Joaquin County 2010

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

2014 NDSU NDCORE ALCOHOL AND DRUG SURVEY Marijuana Use Summary

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Alcohol-Related Crashes Alcohol Overview

REVISED. Humboldt County 2007

2014 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

REVISED. Tulare County 2007

REVISED. Inyo County 2007

1. Which of the following functions is affected by alcohol consumption? A. Vision B. Steering C. Attention D. All of the above

Executive Summary Presentation

05/26/2011 Page 1 of 15

05/26/2011 Page 1 of 15

Excellence in Prevention descriptions of the prevention

Substance Use and Mental Health in Monroe County, Florida

Alcohol consumption in the Ongoing New Zealand Household Travel Survey

Southern Connecticut State University

The Severity of Pedestrian Injuries in Alcohol-Related Collisions

2016 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2016 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

05/27/2011 Page 1 of 15

Alcohol and Other Drug Use among College Students in Illinois

Binge Drinking and Other Risk Behaviors among College Students

MISSION STATEMENT OBJECTIVE

DRUG AND ALCOHOL USE

How Safe Are Our Roads? 2016 Checkpoint Strikeforce campaign poster celebrating real area cab drivers as being Beautiful designated sober drivers.

Alcohol Enforcement in Utah. Team Effort!

Initial Report of Oregon s State Epidemiological Outcomes Workgroup. Prepared by:

University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Alcohol and Other Drug Use Survey Data Spring 2011

Rebecca Ramirez, MPH, Executive Director National Liquor Law Enforcement Association

Comparison of Multiple DUI Offenders Selecting Either Antabuse or 12-Step Treatment Programs

COMMITTEE ON ACCELERATING PROGRESS TO REDUCE ALCOHOL-IMPAIRED DRIVING FATALITIES. May 9, 2017

INCIDENCE, HEALTH OUTCOMES AND COSTS RELATED TO MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES IN WHICH ALCOHOL WAS A FACTOR, WISCONSIN, 2006

MARYLAND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE: CONSEQUENCES OF ILLICIT DRUG USE, ALCOHOL ABUSE, AND SMOKING

Alcohol Use and Related Behaviors

Plumas County Area California Highway Patrol Alcohol and Other Drugs Statistics

State Epidemiological Outcomes Workgroup

2014 NDSU NDCORE ALCOHOL AND DRUG SURVEY Summary. Overall Findings

Trends in Alcohol Use Among Ohio State Students: A Comparison of the 2009 and 2014 NCHA

Norberg et al. Long-Term Effects of Minimum Drinking Age Laws on Past-Year Alcohol and Drug Use Disorders, Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 2009

How Alcohol Outlets Affect Neighborhood Violence

ALCOHOL and CRIME in WYOMING

HOW SAFE ARE OUR ROADS?

Binge Drinking and Other Risk Behaviors among College Students

Multnomah County: Leading Causes of Death

2012 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

Social Host. Laws and Enforcement Options. A Webinar for The Illinois Higher Education Center October 11, 2012

Health Consequences...49 Academic Consequences...53 Other Consequences...54 What Are the Social Norms of Binge Drinking in Our Community?...

11/04/2011 Page 1 of 16

11/03/2011 Page 1 of 16

Nebraska Young Adult Alcohol Opinion Survey State Summary Report

11/02/2011 Page 1 of 16

Raising ABV Levels, Alcohol Consumption and Alcohol-Related Motor Vehicle Fatalities in the United States

2014 Annual Report Tuberculosis in Fresno County. Department of Public Health

Kentucky DUI Assessment Report for 2003

Outcome Report - Alcohol Wise

Underage Drinking and Alcohol Abuse in Kent County, Delaware

Binge Drinking and Other Risk Behaviors among College Students

STARTING A COMMUNITY CONVERSATION ON UNDERAGE DRINKING

Alcohol and Violent Death: The Role of Alcohol in Homicides and Suicides in North Carolina

Firearms in Santa Clara County

2012 NDSU NDCORE ALCOHOL AND DRUG SURVEY Summary

AlcoholEdu for College

Young People and Alcohol: Some Statistics on Possible Effects of Lowering the Drinking Age. Barb Lash

The Role of Race/Ethnicity in Alcohol-attributable Injury in the United States

Excellence in Prevention descriptions of the prevention

Underage Drinking. Underage Drinking Statistics

Alcohol Use among Youth in Delaware by County with addi9onal informa9on on Hispanics in Sussex County

For additional copies of this report, please contact: Public Health/ADEPT 405 West Fifth St., Ste. 211, Santa Ana, CA

How to cite this report: Peel Public Health. A Look at Peel Youth in Grades 7-12: Alcohol. Results from the 2013 Ontario Student Drug Use and Health

The Worldwide Decline in Drinking and Driving

SUN STREET CENTERS. Alcoholism and Drug Addiction Recovery Happens!

CHOICES PRE/POST-TEST

II: ALCOHOL - RELATED CRASHES

05/26/2011 Page 1 of 26

Transcription:

Prepared by Ventura County PLa C e o F La S t Dr I n K SurV ey SpotlIght Driving Under the Influence: Students in College Volume III September 28 Brought to you by

SyNoPSIS Most students in the DDP are attending local community colleges. Though a majority of students are between 21 and 25 years of age, underage drinkers make up 18 percent of the student participants. Almost half of students report their Place of Last drink as a bar, club, or restaurant, although a private residence is close behind. Almost two-thirds report binge drinking on the day of their arrest, and on average students report drinking 6 on that day. Just over 1 in 5 students are stopped in counties outside of Ventura and 17 percent are involved in some type of crash when arrested. Property damage was the most common result of a crash, though over a third involved bodily injury. Where bodily injury occurred, injury to self was the most often reported outcome. Students tend to drink beer and mixed /shots, and 1 in 1 indicates using other drugs prior to their arrest. Among students, gender differences exist in drinking behaviors. Females are more likely to report their Place of Last Drink at a bar, club, or restaurant, whereas, males more often report a private residence. Even though rates of binge drinking are similar between females and males, males report drinking more heavily. However, females report higher BAC on average despite consuming two fewer compared to males. Compared to non-students, students in the DDP are more likely to report their Place of Last Drink in a bar, club, or restaurant and to drink in more than one location on the day of their DUI arrest. For those who reported their Place of Last Drink in a private residence, students are more likely to describe the situation as a house party, involving 1 or more people, and that persons under 21 are present when compared to non-students. It appears that students are more likely to report involvement in a crash and more likely to have injured themselves. Finally, students are also more likely than non-students to have used drugs on the day of their DUI arrest. DIffereNCeS BetweeN StUDeNtS AND NoN-StUDeNtS Students are more likely to report their Place of Last Drink in bar, club, or restaurant (49.2%) compared to their non-student counterparts (44.8%) (Figure 7). Students are less likely than non-students to report drinking beer (57.6% vs. 61.6% respectively) and wine (8.4% vs. 11.4%). In contrast, students are more likely than non-students to report drinking mixed or shots (57.% vs. 44.2%). More students report drinking elsewhere prior to their Place of Last Drink than non-students (21.1% vs. 14.8%). non-students report a higher blood alcohol concentration compared to students (.14 vs..13). Analyses were conducted to determine if circumstances around DUI arrests are different for college/university students (referred to as students ) and those who are not students (referred to as non students ). The rate of students in the DDP has not changed over the last three years. Demographically, students and non students appear to be somewhat different from one another. Students tend to be younger than non students, as might be expected. The average age of a student DDP participant is 26 years, while it is 36 for non students; constituting a 1 year difference. Students are more likely to be female (33.3%) compared to non students (24.1%). Also, students are less likely to be Latino (28.1%) than non students (37.7%). Despite differences in demographic variables, students and non students appear to drink in similar ways. They do not differ in terms of the number of they consumed the day of their arrest. Students drank, on average, 6.3 and non students drank 6.4 2. Additionally, binge drinking is reported at similar rates (64.4% for students, 64.2% for non students). However, where they drink and what they drink is different. contined on back page

College Students in Drinking Driver Program From May 25 to January 28, 5,947 Place of Last Drink surveys were collected from participants of Ventura County s Drinking Driver Program (DDP), a mandatory alcohol and drug education program for persons convicted of driving under the influence. Of those participants, 14 percent (n = 832) report that they attend a college or university. Over half of these students attend community colleges in Ventura County, either at Moorpark College (23.3%) or Ventura College (2.9%) and Oxnard College (9.6%). The next most commonly mentioned colleges or universities include California State University Northridge (4.6%), California State University Channel Islands (4.2%), and California Lutheran (4.2%). Two-thirds of the students in the DDP are male and the average student age is 26 years old. Though most students in the DDP program are 21 to 25 (46.5%), 18% are under the legal drinking age, between 18 and 2 years old (Figure 1). Most students are White (58.2%) or Latino (28.1%). 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % 18.3% 46.5% 31.8% 3.3%.1% 18 to 2 21 to 25 26 to 45 46 to 64 65 and older Figure 1. Age Distribution of Student in DDP Student Drinking Prior to DUI Nearly 5 percent of the students report that their Place of Last Drink prior to their DUI arrest was at a bar, club, or restaurant, followed closely by a private residence (41.6%) (Figure 2). Of those students whose Place of Last Drink was a private residence, many indicate that there were more than 1 persons present in the residence (45.4%), that it was a house party (44.1%), and over half report that underage persons were at the residence (53.6%). When the Place of Last Drink was a bar, club, or restaurant, 12 percent indicate that the establishment had special drink promotions. 5% 4% Figure 2. Place of Last Drink as Reported by Students 38.1% Private residence 42% Bar/Club/Restaurant 49% Vehicle 3% Park/Beach 2% Hotel % Work % Other 4% Almost two-thirds of the students report binge drinking on the day of their arrest (64.4%). The average number of consumed was 6.3, ranging from 1 to 3 1. In fact, 1 in 5 students report drinking 1 or more the night of their arrest (Figure 3). 3% 2% 26.9% 13.4% 21.5% The most commonly reported type of consumed on the day of their arrest by students in the DDP is beer (57.6%) or mixed /shots of liquor (57.%). A small minority of students report drinking wine (8.4%) on the day of their arrest. Additionally, 1 in 1 students (1.2%) report using other drugs prior to their arrest. 1 Reports of 31 or more (N=2) were considered outliers and excluded from calculation of the average number of by students. 1% % 1 to 3 4 to 6 7 to 9 1 or more Figure 3. Number of Drinks Consumed by Students in DDP on the Day of DUI Arrest

Female Male 275 551 Average Age 26.3 25.7 Circumstances Around Student DUI Stops Although the majority of students are stopped for DUI in Ventura County (78.7%), 21 percent are stopped in another county. Most often this county is Los Angeles (12.5%). Furthermore, students are rarely stopped at a DUI checkpoint (1%). For 17 percent of the students, their DUI involved a crash. Over a third report that bodily injury occurred. Race/Ethnicity Range 18-6 18-77 African American 1.1% 2.6% American Indian 1.1%.5% Asian/Pacific Islander 3.% 3.5% Latino 18.1% 32.8% Multi-Racial 3.3% 4.2% White 71.2% 52.3% Other 2.2% 4.2% Table 2. Student Demographic Characteristics of Female and Male Students Most crashes involved property damage only (65.9%), but over a third report that bodily injury occurred (34.1%; with or without property damage) (Figure 4). When an injury occurred, it most often was to the driver (83.%) rather than a passenger (22.2%) or other person in another vehicle (11.1%). According to this group of students, there were no pedestrians injured. 8 Number of Drinks 8.15 6 4 2 Average BAC Average number of consumed on day of arrest.14.13 Averge BAC 6 65.9% Females Males.12 Figure 6. Average Number of Drinks and BAC of Female and Male Students 4 2 Property Damage Only 31.1% Bodily Injury and Property Damage 3.% Bodily Injury Only Figure 4. Results of DUI-Involved Crashes by Students Stopped at DUI Checkpoint Female Male.4% 1.3% Crash Occurred 18.3% 17.% Bodily Injury Only 2.% 3.5% Bodily Injury and 34.7% 29.1% Property Damage Property Damage 63.3% 67.4% Only Where Bodily Injury Occurred Self Injured 83.3% 82.8% Passenger Injured 11.1% 29.6% Person in Other 11.1% 11.1% Vehicle Injured Pedestrian Injured.%.% Table 3. Characteristics of DUI Arrest of Female and Male Students

Gender Differences in Students Analyses were conducted to determine if circumstances around DUI arrests are different for female and male college/ university students. The ratio of male to female students in the DDP is 2:1. There is no age difference between female and male students, and both are more likely to be White (71.2% and 52.3% respectively) compared to other races/ethnicities. However, there are nearly twice as many males who are Latino (32.8%) compared to females (18.1%) (Table 2). The reported Place of Last Drink is different for female and male students. Females are more likely to report their Place of Last Drink as a bar, club, or restaurant (59.%); whereas, males are almost equally likely to report a private residence (46.%) or a bar, club, or restaurant (44.2%) (Figure 5). Female and male students differ in their drinking behaviors in the following ways: Females are more likely than males to drink mixed / shots (72.4% vs. 49.4%) and wine (13.8% vs. 5.6%, respectively) while males are more likely to drink beer (68.4% vs. 36.%). Though rates of binge drinking are similar for females and males (61.5% vs. 65.8% respectively), almost twice as many males as females indicate that they consumed 1 or more on the day of their arrest (25.7% vs. 13.5%). The average number of consumed on the day of the arrest for males is 7 (ranging from 1 3); whereas, females typically report consuming 5 (ranging from 1 2). Despite a greater number of consumed by males, females report a higher BAC (.14, ranging from.1 to.37) compared to their male counterparts (.13, ranging from.1 to.33) (Figure 6). Another difference between male and female students is where students are stopped for their DUI arrest. A greater proportion of females than males report being stopped in Los Angeles County (16.7% vs. 1.2% respectively). However, females and males are similar in other aspects of their DUI arrests. No difference between genders is seen for being stopped at a DUI checkpoint or whether a crash occurred with the DUI. Rates of injuries, types of injuries, and who was injured when a crash occurred are also similar in females and males (Table 3). Additionally, both groups report similar rates of drug use prior to their DUI arrest (9.2% for females, 1.9% for males). Figure 5. Place of Last Drink of Female and Male Students 8 Females Males 6 59% 46% 44.2% 4 32.8% 2 Private Residence Bar, Club or Restaurant 1.9% 3.3% 1.1% 2.4%.4%.2%.7%.2% In a Vehicle At a Park or Beach In a Hotel Room At Work 4.1% 3.7% In Some Other Place

continued from flap Along with differences in what and where they drink, use of drugs by students is different from non students as well. A greater proportion of students indicate that they were using other drugs prior to their DUI arrest than non students (1.2% vs. 8.1% respectively). The nature of drinking in a private residence is also different between students and non students. For those in the DDP who reported their Place of Last Drink as a private residence, students were more likely than non students to describe there was a house party (44.1% vs. 26.5%), that 1 or more people were present (45.4% vs. 26.1%), and that underage drinkers were present at the residence (53.6% vs. 24.6%). The negative consequences may be somewhat greater for students. A larger percentage of students state that their DUI arrest involved a crash (17.3% vs. 14.1%). Though the rate of bodily and property damage are reported to be similar between students and non students, the rate of injuries to themselves is higher for students than non students (83.% vs. 65.9%) when an injury occurred as part of the crash. (Table 5) Non students are more likely to be stopped at a DUI checkpoint compared to students (2.3% vs. 1.% respectively); though overall, the percentage of DDP participants who are stopped at a checkpoint is small (2.1%). Stopped at DUI Checkpoint Students Non-Students 1.% 2.3% Crash Occurred 17.3% 14.1% Bodily Injury Only 3.% 6.7% Bodily Injury and 31.1% 23.5% Property Damage Property Damage 65.9% 69.7% Only Where Bodily Injury Occurred Self Injured 83.% 65.9% Passenger Injured 22.2% 15.4% Person in Other 11.1% 17.9% Vehicle Injured Pedestrian Injured.% 1.% table 5. Characteristics of DUI Arrest of Students and Non-Students Figure 7. Place of Last Drink of Students and Non-Students 6 5 42% 45% 49% 45% Students Non-Students 4 3 2 1 Private Residence Bar, Club or Restaurant 3% 3% In a Vehicle 2% 2% At a Park or Beach % In a Hotel Room 1% 1% % At Work 4% 3% In Some Other Place 2 Reports of 31 or more (2 students, 11 non-students) were considered outliers and excluded from calculation of the average number of students. For more information please contact Kathy Staples and Dan Hicks at 85-981-9292.