Measurement of Small Dense Low-density Lipoprotein Particles

Similar documents
The Effects of Statin and Fibrate on Lowering Small Dense LDL- Cholesterol in Hyperlipidemic Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Clinical Significance of Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels Determined by the Simple Precipitation Method

Role of Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein in Coronary Artery Disease Patients With Normal Plasma Cholesterol Levels. Small Dense KATAGIRI, MD, FJCC

REAGENTS. RANDOX sdldl CHOLESTEROL (sdldl-c) SIZE MATTERS: THE TRUE WEIGHT OF RISK IN LIPID PROFILING

Metabolism and Atherogenic Properties of LDL

Walter B. Bayubay CLS (ASCP), AMT, MA Ed, CPI

Separation of HDL Particles by Immunoprecipitation

Normal VLDL IDL LDL 1-2 HDL. Abnormal VLDL IDL LDL 1-7 HDL. Figure 1. Normal (Pattern A) and abnormal (Pattern B) lipoprotein profiles

LDL SUBCLASS PATTERNS AND ATHEROGENICITY IN NON-INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS

Effect of pravastatin on LDL particle concentration as determined by NMR spectroscopy: a substudy of a randomized placebo controlled trial

Inside This Issue. Spring 2009 Volume XXIII, No. 2. Editor s Notes by John Contois...2. Chair s Corner by Gyorgy Csako...3

Small Dense LDL Cholesterol is a Promising Biomarker for Secondary Prevention

methods Alex Sawle,* Matthew K. Higgins, Marcus P. Olivant,* and Joan A. Higgins 1, *

LIPOPROTEIN PROFILING

Effect of TAK-085 on Low-density Lipoprotein Particle Size in Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Study

Behind LDL: The Metabolism of ApoB, the Essential Apolipoprotein in LDL and VLDL

Influence of LDL apheresis on LDL subtypes in patients with coronary heart disease and severe hyperlipoproteinemia

Relationship of Apolipoprotein B Levels to the Number of Risk Factors for Metabolic Syndrome

Traceable lipoprotein counting for Cardiovascular disease risk assessment Vincent DELATOUR, PhD

Status of Small Dense LDL in Fasting and Nonfasting Lipidemia in Coronary Heart Disease

Lipoprotein Subclasses and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Insulin-Resistant Diabetes

Katsuyuki Nakajima, PhD. Member of JCCLS International Committee

Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels

The apolipoprotein story

Clinical Investigation and Reports

Zuhier Awan, MD, PhD, FRCPC

2.5% of all deaths globally each year. 7th leading cause of death by % of people with diabetes live in low and middle income countries

Small dense low-density lipoprotein is a risk for coronary artery disease in an urban Japanese cohort: The Suita study

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] constitutes a class of lipoprotein

Lipoprotein Particle Profile

sad EFFECTIVE DATE: POLICY LAST UPDATED:

PLASMA LIPOPROTEINS AND LIPIDS DETERMINATION OF PLASMA CHOLESTEROL AND TRIGLICERIDE LEVEL

What Else Do You Need to Know? Presenter Disclosure Information. Case 1: Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in a 53-Year-Old Man. Learning Objectives

Lipids, Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Risk: Getting the Most out of New and Old Biomarkers. New and Old Biomarkers. Disclosures

Coverage Guidelines. NMR LipoProfile and NMR LipoProfile -II Tests

CARDIO Test INFAI. for Cardiac Risk Assessment

JMSCR Vol 05 Issue 05 Page May 2017

High density lipoprotein metabolism

Estimation of Plasma Small Dense LDL Cholesterol From Classic Lipid Measures

High-Density Lipoprotein Subclass Testing in the Diagnosis and Management of Cardiovascular Disease. Original Policy Date

Approach to Dyslipidemia among diabetic patients

Metabolism, Atherogenic Properties and Agents to reduce Triglyceride-Rich Lipoproteins Manfredi Rizzo, MD, PhD

BIOCHEMISTRY BLOOD - SERUM Result Range Units

note on methodology I

Disclosures. Background 1 What is Known MENOPAUSE, ESTROGENS, AND LIPOPROTEIN PARTICLES. Background 2 What is Not Known 10/2/2017

articles on methodology

Effects of Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin on LDL and HDL Particle Concentrations in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome

Atherogenic Lipoprotein Profile in Families with and without History of Early Myocardial Infarction

Measurement of Trigly ceride-rich Lipoproteins by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

HDL Purification Kit (Ultracentrifugation Free)

The New Gold Standard for Lipoprotein Analysis. Advanced Testing for Cardiovascular Risk

LDL/VLDL Purification Kit (Ultracentrifugation Free)

PREDIABETES TESTING SERVICES

CLINICAL SCIENCE. Protasio Lemos da Luz, I Desiderio Favarato, I Jose Rocha Faria-Neto Junior, II Pedro Lemos, I Antonio Carlos Palandri Chagas I

Association of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Particle Size

Comparison of a Homogeneous Assay With a Precipitation Method for the Measurement of HDL Cholesterol in Diabetic Patients

Do Cholesterol Numbers Really Assess Cardiovascular Risk?

Asian Indians have been consistently shown to have

SERUM LIPOPROTEIN ESTIMATION BY POLYACRYL AMIDE GEL DISC ELECTROPHORESIS

Lipoprotein Subpopulation Distributions in Lean, Obese, and Type 2 Diabetic Women: A Comparison of African and White Americans

Measurement of Serum Intermediate Density Lipoproteins (Remnant-like Particles) Original Policy Date

Human LDL ELISA Kit. Innovative Research, Inc.

Lipoprotein (a) Disclosures 2/20/2013. Lipoprotein (a): Should We Measure? Should We Treat? Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc. No other disclosures

Lipoprint HDL Subfractions Testing System

Production of polyacrylamide gradient gels for the electrophoretic resolution of lipoproteins

Hypertriglyceridemia: Why, When, and How to Treat. Gregory Cohn, MD, FNLA, FASPC

Lipoprotein Particle Size and Concentration by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Incident Type 2 Diabetes in Women

Achieving Secondary Prevention Low-Density Lipoprotein Particle Concentration Goals Using Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Based Data

MagCapture Exosome Isolation Kit PS Q&A

Low-density lipoprotein as the key factor in atherogenesis too high, too long, or both

2.0 Synopsis. Choline fenofibrate capsules (ABT-335) M Clinical Study Report R&D/06/772. (For National Authority Use Only) Name of Study Drug:

Metabolism of Human Intermediate and Very Low Density Lipoprotein Subtractions from Normal and Dysbetalipoproteinemic Plasma

doi: /01.ATV

New Features of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Lipid-Lowering Guidelines

Familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCH) was first described

Smaller Mean LDL Particle Size and Higher Proportion of Small Dense LDL in Korean Type 2 Diabetic Patients

THE EFFECT OF VITAMIN-C THERAPY ON HYPERGLYCEMIA, HYPERLIPIDEMIA AND NON HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN LEVEL IN TYPE 2 DIABETES

Depleting Lipoproteins from Serum

SMALL-SIZE LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROtein

Pathophysiology of Lipid Disorders

THE CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY OF LIPID DISORDERS

Assessment of clinical profile of coronary artery disease in Indian Population

Comparison of two assays for measuring LDL cholesterol

AF HDL and LDL/VLDL Assay Kit

Epidemiological studies have shown an association between

The insulin resistance syndrome (IRS) is a trait

Myo-Inositol Treatment Increases Serum Plasmalogens and Decreases Small Dense LDL, Particularly in Hyperlipidemic Subjects with Metabolic Syndrome

Tracking a Killer Molecule

Hypertriglyceridemia, Inflammation, & Pregnancy

Supplementary Appendix

Original Article. CAD is several times higher than the general population 1, 2) ; however, there is a wide variation of coronary

Chapter (5) Etiology of Low HDL- Cholesterol

Effect of orlistat on postprandial lipemia, NMR lipoprotein subclass profiles and particle size

ARTICLE. Utility of Direct Measurement of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Dyslipidemic Pediatric Patients

Update On Diabetic Dyslipidemia: Who Should Be Treated With A Fibrate After ACCORD-LIPID?

There are many ways to lower triglycerides in humans: Which are the most relevant for pancreatitis and for CV risk?

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) comprises a heterogeneous

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 37, No. 2, by the American College of Cardiology ISSN /01/$20.

Transcription:

67 Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis Reviews Vol. 12, No. 2 Measurement of Small Dense Low-density Lipoprotein Particles Tsutomu Hirano 1, Yasuki Ito 2, and Gen Yoshino 3 1 Division of Diabetes and Metabolism, First Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 2 Research and Development Department, Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan. 3 Department of Diabetes, Metabolism and Endocrinology, Toho University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. Low density lipoprotein (LDL) particles are heterogenous with respect to their size, density and lipid composition. Among LDL particles, the smaller and denser LDL particles [small dense (sd) LDL] are more atherogenic and the sd LDL phenotype is strongly associated with development of coronary heart disease. Here we will review various methods for measurement of sd LDL. Although ultracentrifugation, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and gradient-gel electrophoresis (GGE) are usually employed for the measurement of sd LDL, such methods are either too laborious or expensive for general clinical use. We recently established a simple precipitation method for the quantification of sd LDL. This method is applicable to routine clinical use and allows the rapid measurement of a large number of samples. J Atheroscler Thromb, 2005; 12: 67 72. Key words: Small dense LDL, Cholesterol, Apolipoprotein B, Precipitation Introduction Low density lipoprotein (LDL) particles are heterogenous with respect to their size, density, and lipid composition. Compared with large buoyant LDL, small dense (sd) LDL are thought to be more atherogenic as a result of their better penetration of the arterial wall, lower binding affinity for the LDL receptor, longer plasma half-life, and weaker resistance to oxidative stress (1, 2). Several studies have reported a 2- to 3-fold increase in the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients with sd LDL (3 5). We have also reported that sd LDL is closely associated with coronary events in the Japanese population, an ethnic group that has lower LDL cholesterol levels compared with Western populations (6, 7). Sd LDL is generated from large triglyceride-rich very-low density lipoprotein (VLDL1) (8). Since hepatic production of VLDL1 is stimulated by insulin resistance, the prevalence Address for correspondence: Tsutomu Hirano, Division of Diabetes and Metabolism, First Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, 1 5 8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142 8666, Japan. E-mail: hirano@med.showa-u.ac.jp Received September 14, 2004. Accepted for publication September 28, 2004. of sd LDL is associated with insulin resistance (9). Therefore, sd LDL has been highlighted as a useful new marker for the risk of CHD or type 2 diabetes (10). There are several methods for the assessment of lipoprotein size. Gradient gel electrophoresis (GGE) is used most widely (11), but this method is not a quantitative assay for sd LDL. Atherogenic potency should increase with an increase in the number of atherogenic lipoprotein particles, while the atherogenic potential should be reduced if few particles are present. Therefore, quantification of small dense LDL would be preferable to measurement of LDL size for evaluating the overall atherogenic risk, since it should more clearly indicate the atherogenic potential. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and ultracentrifugation are standard procedures for quantification of sd LDL, but they require special equipment, and are too difficult to use in daily clinical practice. We recently established a simple method for the quantification of sd LDL using heparin-magnesium precipitation. Here we review various methods for measurement of sd LDL, and also introduce our new method. Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (GGE) LDL particle size is most often measured by gradient

68 Hirano et al. gel electrophoresis (GGE) using nondenaturing 2 16% polyacrylamide gel according to the procedure described by Nichols, Krauss, and Musliner (12). Gels containing acrylamide and bis-acrylamide were obtained from BIO CRAFT (Tokyo, Japan). A 10-µl plasma sample is applied to each lane with 20% sucrose and 0.25% bromophenol blue (final concentrations). Electrophoresis is performed in a refrigerated cell (10 15 C) with a prerun for 15 min at 125 V and entry of samples into the stacking gel at 70 V, followed by migration at 200 V for 4 h and finally at 400 V for 1 h. Then, the gels are stained for lipids overnight with oil-red O in 5% ethanol. Next, the gels are destained in a 45% ethanol solution, and the original gel size is restored in a 5% acetic acid overnight. LDL peak particle size is determined from the migration of standards of known diameters, such as ferritin (12.2 nm), thyroglobulin (17.0 nm), and 39.0 nm latex beads. Pooled plasma is always used as an internal standard. GGE separates LDL particles based on the principle that the particles migrate through the gradient gel until further penetration is restricted by their size. Two distinct LDL size phenotypes have been proposed, these are pattern A with a higher proportion of large buoyant LDL particles (mean diameter > 25.5 nm) and pattern B with a predominance of small dense LDL particles (mean diameter < 25.5 nm) (3 5). Figure 1 shows the representative appearance of LDL bands obtained with GGE. Lanes 1, 6 and 12 show standard plasma with an average LDL diameter of 26.5 nm, lanes 2 5 show plasma samples with pattern A, and lanes 7 8 and 10 11 show plasma samples with pattern B. Disk Polyacrylamide Gel Electropheresis The gel is commercially available (Lipophor Gel, Joko, Tokyo, Japan) (Lipoprint system LDL, Quantimetrix, Redondo Beach, CA, USA) and the run time is relatively short. Fresh serum is placed in glass gel tubes and then a loading gel containing Sudan Black B is added to each tube and mixed with the samples. The loading gel is polymerized using fluorescent light for 40 min and then electrophoresis is done at a constant current of 3 ma/tube for 60 min. Finally, the gel in each glass tube is scanned directly at a wave length of 610 nm. Different LDL subfractions can be identified by their migration distance. Each LDL subfraction has a specific electrophoretic mobility (Rf) relative to HDL when VLDL is at the origin of the separating gel and HDL is at the end of the gel (Fig. 2). Although several LDL subfractions can be detected by this method, we defined the Rf for the highest peak of LDL bands as the peak size of LDL particles. We found an excellent correlation between Rf values obtained by this method and LDL size as determined by the method of Nichols et al. (r = 0.85, p < 0.001, n = 41) (13). Plasma Makers for Sd LDL Each LDL particle contains one large molecule of apo B100 as its constituent protein and cholesterol as the Fig. 1. Representative appearance of LDL bands in GGE. The lanes 1, 6 and 12 show standard plasma with an average LDL diameter of 26.5 nm. Lane 2 5 show plasma samples with pattern A, while lanes 7 8 and lanes 10 11 (allows) show plasma samples with pattern B. Fig. 2. Typical migration pattern of large buoyant LDL (no. 96) and small dense LDL (no. 49) in Lipophor gel. The electrophoretic mobility (Rf ) is calculated from the migration distance between the LDL band and VLDL bands when the distance from VLDL to HDL is 1.0. We assumed that an Rf of 0.4 corresponded to an LDL diameter of 25.5 nm determined by GGE, which is the cut-off value to distinguish LDL size phenotype pattern A (large buoyant LDL) from pattern B (small dense LDL) (see Ref. 13).

Small Dense LDL Assay 69 major lipid component. The size of LDL particles is largely determined by their cholesterol content (14, 15), so sd LDL is a cholesterol-poor particle. Since over 90% of plasma apo B is recovered in the LDL fraction, the plasma apo B concentration roughly corresponds to the number of LDL particles. Therefore, the LDL-cholesterol concentration divided by plasma apo B concentration approximately indicates the cholesterol content of a LDL particle. We found that the LDL-C/apo B ratio was significantly correlated with LDL size as determined by GGE (Fig. 3). Using this correlation curve, we determined the cut-off value of the LDL-C/apo B ratio corresponding to a LDL diameter of 25.5 nm, and found that the appropriate LDL-C/apo B ratio was 1.2. Thus, the preponderance of sd LDL can be estimated by the extent to which the LDL-C/apo B ratio is less than 1.2. It is well recognized that the plasma TG level is the chief determinant of LDL size, and that 50% of LDL size can be explained by the plasma TG level. According to Austin et al. (4), it is very rare to find subjects with sd LDL who have a TG level below 120 mg/dl. Conversely, few people with hypertriglyceridemia (TG > 200 mg/dl) have large buoyant LDL. Maruyama et al. (16) recommended the TG/HDL- C ratio as a superior marker of sd LDL relative to TG or HDL-C alone. They found that 75% of subjects with sd LDL had a TG/HDL-C ratio greater than 0.9 using mmol/ l or 2.0 using mg/dl, while only 25% of the normal LDL group had a ratio above that level. Fig. 3. Correlation between the LDL-C/apo B ratio and LDL size determined by GGE. An LDL-C/apo B ratio of 1.2 corresponded to an LDL diameter of 25.5 nm, which is the cut-off value to distinguishing LDL pattern A from pattern B. Proton NMR spectroscopy Otvos et al. (17) first reported a method of lipoprotein analysis using proton NMR spectroscopy, which measures the signal emitted by plasma lipid methyl groups during magnetic resonance scanning. This method distinguishes the component peaks associated with major lipoproteins and their subclasses, including sd LDL. The major advantage of the NMR method is that it enables measurement of both the size and mass of LDL subclasses simultaneously. A total of 16 subclasses can be measured, including six VLDL subclasses, 4 LDL subclasses, and 5 HDL subclasses. The average lipoprotein particle size is determined by weighting the mass percentage of each subclass relative to its diameter. LDL sizes measured by NMR method are closely correlated with those measured by the GGE method, but are 5 nm smaller (18). Accordingly, 20.5 nm becomes a good cutoff value to distinguish individuals with pattern A or pattern B. Although NMR spectroscopy allows the measurement of both size and mass for all lipoproteins, it requires specialized laboratory equipment and hence has not become popular. Sequential ultracentrifugation Large buoyant LDL (d = 1.019 1.044 g/ml) and small dense LDL (d = 1.044 1.063 g/ml) can be separated from plasma by sequential ultracentrifugation with a fixed angle rotor. Serum (2 ml) is mixed with d = 1.045 solution (1 ml) and ultracentrifugation (80,000 rpm (290,000 g: R avg)) is done for 7 h at 16 C. After discarding the supernatant containing d < 1.019 lipoproteins, 1 ml of d = 1.094 solution is added to the infranatant, and then it is spun at 100,000 rpm (453,000 g) for 23 h. Large buoyant LDL (d = 1.019 1.044 g/ml) is recovered in the supernatant. One milliliter of d = 1.101 solution is added to the infranatant after removing the supernatant and it is spun at 80,000 rpm (290,000 g) for 22 h. Finally, 1 ml of the supernatant is taken as sd LDL (d = 1.044 1.063 g/ml). The apo B concentration can be measured in the separated LDL fractions by an immunoturbidometric assay using a commercially available test kit (Apo B Auto N DAIICHI, Daiichi Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan). Menys et al. (19) reported the simplified ultracentrifugation method, in which plasma in two tubes was adjusted to a density of 1.044 and 1.060 g/ml, respectively. Measurement of sd LDL-apo B was done by subtracting the apo B concentration in d > 1.060 lipoproteins from that in d > 1.044 lipoproteins. Density gradient ultracentrifugation Density gradient ultracentrifugation is performed on plasma samples to calculate the relative LDL flotation rate and density distribution of lipoprotein cholesterol (20, 21). A discontinuous salt density gradient is created in an ultracentrifuge tube. Plasma samples are centrifuged at 65,000 rpm for 70 min at 10 C in a vertical rotor. Then, the fractions are collected from the bottom of the centrifuge tube, and the cholesterol level in each fraction is

70 Hirano et al. measured. The relative flotation rate (Rf ), which characterizes LDL peak buoyancy as a continuous variable, is calculated as the fraction number containing the LDL cholesterol peak divided by the total number of fractions collected. Davies, Graham, and Griffin recently reported a simple method for the detection of sd LDL by gradient ultracentrifugation using a self-forming density gradient of iodixanol (22). The total run time was shortened to 3 h. Precipitation method for the quantification of sd LDL It is well known that a combination of divalent cations and polyanion precipitates apo B-containing lipoproteins, which allows HDL-cholesterol to be measured. However, we (23) found that the combination of heparin and magnesium (Mg) did not precipitate all apo B-containing lipoproteins, since the denser LDL remained in the supernatant. Figure 4 shows the changes of lipid, apo B, and apo AI concentrations in the supernatant after heparin- Mg precipitation or heparin-manganase (Mn) precipitation with variation of heparin concentration. A higher concentration of heparin completely precipitated apo B and LDL-C in the presence of Mn, whereas apo B and LDL-C remained in the supernatant after heparin-mg precipitation. This prepitipation method is performed as follows. The precipitation reagent (0.1 ml) containing 15 U/ml heparin sodium salt and 90 mmol/l MgCl 2 is added to each serum sample (0.1 ml), followed by mixing and incubation for 10 min at 37 C. Then the samples are placed in a ice bath and left to stand for 15 min, after which the precipitate is collected by centrifuging at 15,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 C. This procedure yields a precipitate packed tightly at the bottom of the tube and a clear supernatant. An aliquot of the supernatant is removed for analysis of LDLcholesterol and apo B. The LDL-cholesterol level in the heparin-mg supernatant (containing sd LDL (d = 1.044 1.063 g/ml) and HDL) is directly and selectively measured by the homogenous method (LDL-EX, Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan). This direct LDL cholesterol assay can be done by an autoanalyser, reducing the assay time to 10 min. Sd LDL-apo B in the heparin-mg 2+ supernatant can also be measured by an immunoturbidometric assay. However, because there is a strong correlation between sd LDL-C and sd LDL-apo B (r = 0.94, p < 0.0001), we decided to only measure sd LDL-C. Comparison with the ultracentrifugation method gave a correlation coefficient of r = 0.91 and an equation of y = 1.090 1.8 (n = 146) (Fig. 5). There was a positive correlation with the total LDL-C level and also with the triglyceride level, while there was a negative correlation with LDL particle size and the HDL-C level. Ito et al. (24) refined this method by using a Millipore filter to eliminate the debris that are often found in the supernatant when severely hypertriglyceridemic Fig. 4. Effect of altering the concentrations of heparin on the LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), apo AI, and apo B levels in the supernatant after the heparin-mg or the herparin-mn precipitation. A constant concentration of MnCl 2 (30 mmol/l) or MgCl 2 (90 mmol/l) was used and only the heparin concentration was varied. Fig. 5. Correlation between ultracentrifugation and the precipitation method. Lipoprotein with density of 1.044 1.063 g/ml was separated by the ultracentrifugation method.

Small Dense LDL Assay 71 Fig. 6. The procedure of th improved precipitation method. The precipitation reagent (0.1 ml) containing 150 U/ml heparin sodium salt and 90 mmol/ l MgCl 2 is added to each serum sample (0.1 ml), and incubated for 10 min at 37 C. Then sd LDL (d = 1.044 1.063 g/ml) and HDL are collected by filtering off the more buoyant lipoproteins, after which LDL-cholesterol is measured by the homogenous method. serum is tested (Fig. 6). This improved method filters out large buoyant LDL and other apo B-containing lipoproteins, which form aggregates with the heparin-mg reagent, and can completely eliminate non-specific debris. The assay time for this precipitation procedure is shortened to 11 min. In summary, although the importance of measurement of sd LDL is well recognized, there is no standard assay procedure in general clinical use. We established a simple method for the quantification of sd LDL-C in serum using heparin-mg precipitation. This precipitation method is applicable to routine clinical examination and allows the rapid measurement of a large number of samples. Acknowledgements: We are indebted to Hiroko Takeuchi, and Ayako Ikejiri in Showa University for technical assistance. This study was in part supported by a grantin-aid, Showa University Medical Foundation (Kyodo Kenkyu, Chair person, Professor K. Kumada). References ( 1 ) Chapman MJ, Guerin M, and Bruckert E: Atherogenic, low-density lipoproteins. Pathophysiology and new therapeutic approaches. Eur Heart J 19 (Suppl A): A24 A30, 1998 ( 2 ) Bjornheded T, Babyi A, Bodjers G, and Wiklund O: Accumulation of lipoprotein fractions and subfractions in the arterial wall, determinded in an in vitro perfusion system. Atherosclerosis, 123: 43 56, 1996 ( 3 ) Austin MA, Breslow JL, Hennekens GH, Buring JE, Willett WC, and Krauss RM: Low-density lipoprotein subclass patterns and risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA, 260: 1917 1921, 1988 ( 4 ) Austin MA, King MC, Viranizan KM, and Krauss RM: Atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype: a proposed genetic marker for coronary heart disease risk. Circulation, 82: 495 506, 1990 ( 5 ) Austin, MA, Hokanson JE, and Brunzell JD: Characterization of low-density lipoprotein subclasses: methodologic approaches and clinical relevance. Curr Opin Lipidol, 5: 395 403, 1994 ( 6 ) Koba S and Hirano T: Small dense low-density lipoprotein in Japanese men with coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med, 132: 762, 2000 ( 7 ) Koba S, Hirano T, Yoshino G, Sakai K, Sakaue T, Adachi M, and Katagiri T: Remarkably high prevalence of small dense low-density lipoprotein in Japanese men with coronary artery disease, irrespective of the presence of diabetes. Atherosclerosis, 160: 249 256, 2002 ( 8 ) Packard CJ and Shepherd J: Lipoprotein hetero-

72 Hirano et al. geneity and apolipoprotein B metabolism. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 17: 3542 3556, 1997 ( 9 ) Berneis KK and Krauss RM: Metabolic origins and clinical significance of LDL heterogeneity. J Lipid Res, 43: 1363 1379, 2002 (10) Austin MA, Mykkanen L, Kuusisto J, Edwards KL, Nelson C, Haffner SM, Pyorala K, and Laakso M: Prospective study of small LDLs as a risk factor for non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in elderly men and women. Circulation, 92: 1770 1778, 1995 (11) Krauss RM and Burke DJ: Identification of multiple subclasses of plasma low density. J Lipid Res, 23: 97 104, 1982 (12) Nichols, AV, Krauss RM, and Musliner TA: Nondenaturing polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis. Methods Enzymol, 128: 417 433, 1986 (13) Yoshino G, Hirano T, and Kazumi T: Treatment of small dense LDL. J Atheroscler Thromb, 9: 266 275, 2002 (14) McNamara JR, Small DM, Li Z, and Schaefer EJ: Differences in LDL subspecies involve alterations in lipid composition and conformational changes in apolipoprotein B. J Lipid Res, 37: 1924 1935, 1996 (15) Capell WH, Zambon A, Austin MA, Brunzell JD, and Hokanson JE: Compositional differences of LDL particles in normal subjects with LDL subclass phenotype A and LDL subclass phenotype B. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 16: 1040 1069, 1996 (16) Maruyama C, Imamura K, and Teramoto T: Assessment of LDL particle size by triglyceride/hdl-cholesterol ratio in non-diabetic, healthy subjects without prominent hyperlipidemia. J Atheroscler Thromb, 10: 186 191, 2003 (17) Otvos JD, Jeyarajah EJ, and Bennett DW: Quantification of plasma lipoproteins by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Clin Chem, 37: 377 386, 1991 (18) Witte DR, Taskinen MR, Perttunen-Nio H, Van Tol A, Livingstone S, and Colhoun HM: Study of agreement between LDL size as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance and gradient gel electrophoresis. J Lipid Res, 45: 1069 1076, 2004 (19) Menys VC, Liu Y, Mackness MI, Caslake MJ, Kwok S, and Durrington PN: Measurement of plasma small-dense LDL concentration by a simplified ultracentrifugation procedure and immunoassay of apolipoprotein B. Clin Chim Acta, 334: 95 106, 2003 (20) Griffin BA, Freeman DJ, Tait GW, Thomson J, Caslake MJ, Packard CJ, and Shepherd J: Role of plasma triglyceride in the regulation of plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions: relative contribution of small, dense LDL to coronary heart disease risk. Atherosclerosis, 106: 241 253, 1994 (21) Hokanson JE, Krauss RM, Albers JJ, Austin MA, and Brunzell JD: LDL physical and chemical properties in familial combined hyperlipidemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 15: 452 459, 1995 (22) Davies IG, Graham JM, and Griffin BA: Rapid separation of LDL subclasses by iodixanol gradient ultracentrifugation. Clin Chem, 49: 1865 1872, 2003 (23) Hirano T, Ito Y, Saegusa H, and Yoshino G: A novel and simple method for quantification of small, dense LDL. J Lipid Res, 44: 2193 2201, 2003 (24) Ito Y, Hirano T, Yamazaki J, and Yoshino G: New simple method for small, dense LDL: development of a new quantification method and clinical significance. Rinsho Byori, 52: 406 413, 2004 (in Japanese)