Comparative Study of Four Different Brands of Lisinopril Available In Karachi Safila Naveed *, Huma Dilshad and Fakhra Khalid

Similar documents
Simple UV Spectrophotometric Assay of Atorvastatin API Formulation and their Comparative Study

Global College of Pharmacy, Kahnpur Khui, Tehsil Anandpur Sahib, Distt.- Ropar, Punjab, India

Biowaiver Study on Prednisolone Tablets 5 mg in Three Different Brands. Marketed in Sudan. Safaa Mohamed *, Tilal Elsaman

Formulation and evaluation of sublingual tablets of lisinopril

Formulation and In-vitro Evaluation of Chewable Tablets of Montelukast Sodium

Formulation and evaluation of immediate release salbutamol sulphate

World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research SJIF Impact Factor 5.990

COMPARATIVE IN VITRO EVALUATION OF COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE PANTOPRAZOLE DELAYED RELEASE TABLETS

Development and validation of UV spectrophotometric estimation of lisinopril dihydrate in bulk and tablet dosage form using area under curve method

The P&T Committee Lisinopril (Qbrelis )

J Pharm Sci Bioscientific Res (4): ISSN NO

Antihypertensive Agents Part-2. Assistant Prof. Dr. Najlaa Saadi PhD Pharmacology Faculty of Pharmacy University of Philadelphia

MEDAK DIST. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE, INDIA. Research Article RECEIVED ON ACCEPTED ON

Post Marketing Surveillance on Propranolol and Atenolol Tablets Manufactured in Iran

Comparative in-vitro evaluation of four different brands of metformin HCl available in Kanpur district, India

STABILITY STUDIES OF FORMULATED CONTROLLED RELEASE ACECLOFENAC TABLETS

ANGIOTENSIN II RECEPTOR BLOCKERS: MORE THAN THE ALTERNATIVE PRESENTATION BY: PATRICK HO, USC PHARM D. CANDIDATE OF 2017 MENTOR: DR.

Antihypertensive drugs SUMMARY Made by: Lama Shatat

Volume: 2: Issue-3: July-Sept ISSN FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF SUSTAINED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS OF NICORANDIL

2. Review of literature: 2.1 General review on methods of simultaneous determination of hypertensive drugs.

Evaluation of Pharmaceutical and Chemical Equivalence of Selected Brands of Diclofenac Sodium Tablets J.O. AYORINDE*, M.A. ODENIYI AND A.O.

STUDIES ON EFFECT OF BINDERS ON ETORICOXIB TABLET FORMULATIONS

Short Communication. Formulation of Furosemide Dispersible Tablets for Use in Paediatrics V. V. ABWOVA, P. N. MBEO, L. J. TIROP AND K. A. M.

Formulation and Evaluation of Rosuvastatin Immediate Release Tablets 10 Mg

ACE. Inhibitors. Quiz feedback

Formulation and Evaluation

Development, Estimation and Validation of Lisinopril in Bulk and its Pharmaceutical Formulation by HPLC Method

Nigerian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research

Formulation And Evaluation Of Flurbiprofen Matrix Tablets For Colon Targeting

IJPRD, 2012; Vol 4(10): December-2012 ( ) International Standard Serial Number

Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Life Science ISSN Vol. 2 (2), July-Sept,2012

Formulation Development and Assessment of Naproxen Sodium Tablet (Anti Rheumatic Agent)

IJRPC 2011, 1(4) Rohan et al. ISSN: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHARMACY AND CHEMISTRY

Bioequivalence Studies of Two Formulations of Famciclovir Tablets by HPLC Method

Research Article. Chemical equivalence three brands of Aspirin sold in Sokoto State

Amlodipine plus Lisinopril Tablets AMLOPRES-L

FORMULATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ER METOPROLAOL SUCCINATE TABLETS

Pelagia Research Library

(ACE) inhibitor class that is primarily used in cardiovascular. conditions. Lisinopril was introduced into therapy in the early

ANALYTICAL METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR THE ESTIMATION OF DILTIAZEM HYDROCHLORIDE IN BULK AND PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORM BY RP- HPLC

PREPARATION AND INVITRO EVALUATION OF RABEPRAZOLE SODIUM DELAYED RELEASE ENTERIC COATED TABLETS

1. Despite the plethora of new ACE-inhibitors they offer little advantage over the earlier products captopril and enalapril.

Int. Res J Pharm. App Sci., 2014; 4(1):47-51 ISSN:

Formulation and Development of Sustained Release Tablets of Valsartan Sodium

Available online Research Article

Development and Validation of Area Under Curve Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Thiocolchicoside and Lornoxicam in Tablet Dosage Form

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 9 March 2011

JINNAH UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN

A HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHIC ASSAY FOR LERCANIDIPINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Research Article Derivative Spectrophotometric Method for Estimation of Metformin Hydrochloride in Bulk Drug and Dosage Form

LXIV: DRUGS: 4. RAS BLOCKADE

Quality Assessment of Different Brands of Rabeprazole Tablets Marketed In Some Nigerian Cities

Archives 2017 vol.2 1-9

Volume 6; Number 1 January 2012 NICE CLINICAL GUIDELINE 127: HYPERTENSION CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF PRIMARY HYPERTENSION IN ADULTS (AUGUST 2011)

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF CEFIXIME TRIHYDRATE ORAL DISINTEGRATING AGENTS

Available online at Scholars Research Library

Development and evaluation of controlled release mucoadhesive tablets of Tramadol Hydrochloride

PHARMACEUTICAL INFORMATION AZILSARTAN

1. Antihypertensive agents 2. Vasodilators & treatment of angina 3. Drugs used in heart failure 4. Drugs used in arrhythmias

A. General Appearance

COMPARISON OF QUALITY CONTROL OF TWO DIFFERENT B-COMPLEX TABLETS AND THEIR LEGISLATIVE ISSUES ON THE ALBANIAN PHARMACEUTICAL MARKET

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF PIROXICAM AND CELECOXIB TABLETS EMPLOYING PROSOLVE BY DIRECT COMPRESSION METHOD

UV-Spectrophotometric methods for estimation of Valsartan in bulk and tablet dosage form

Scholars Research Library. Der Pharmacia Lettre, 2015, 7 (5):44-49 (

Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res., 31(1), March April 2015; Article No. 46, Pages:

TENOFOVIR TABLETS: Final text for addition to The International Pharmacopoeia (June 2010)

7. SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Preparation and evaluation of orally disintegrating tablets of Telmisartan with ph independent release

This revision also necessitates a change in the table numbering in the test for Organic Impurities.

Available online Research Article

A Comparative Evaluation of Cross Linked Starch Urea-A New Polymer and Other Known Polymers for Controlled Release of Diclofenac

Medical Translation: Welcome to our webinar

FABRICATION AND EVALUATION OF GLIMEPIRIDE CORDIA DICHOTOMA G.FORST FRUIT MUCILAGE SUSTAINED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research

Optimization of valsartan tablet formulation by 2 3 factorial design

Heart Failure. Subjective SOB (shortness of breath) Peripheral edema. Orthopnea (2-3 pillows) PND (paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea)

Formulation and In-vitro Evaluation of Sumatriptan succinate Bilayer Tablets

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2012, 4(6): Research Article. Studies on Carica Papaya Starch as a Pharmaceutical Excipient

CHAPTER-6 IDENTIFICATION, AND CHARACTERISATION OF DEGRADATION IMPURITY IN VALSARTAN TABLETS

World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research

Simple and stability indicating RP-HPLC assay method development and validation lisinopril dihydrate by RP-HPLC in bulk and dosage form

Available online Research Article

Karnataka Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, H.K.E. Society s College of Pharmacy, Gulbarga, Karnataka ABSTRACT KEYWORDS:

Byvalson. (nebivolol, valsartan) New Product Slideshow

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF COLORIMETRIC METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF RITONAVIR IN TABLETS

Section 3, Lecture 2

International Journal of Innovative Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research

SULFAMETHOXAZOLE AND TRIMETHOPRIM TABLETS Draft proposal for The International Pharmacopoeia (September 2010)

DESIGN AND CHARACTERIZATION OF FLOATING TABLETS OF ANTI-DIABETIC DRUG

Medications for Type 2 Diabetes CDE Exam Preparation. Wendy Graham, RD, CDE Mentor, WWD Angela Puim, RPh, CDE, CRE Preston Medical Pharmacy

Younger adults with a family history of premature artherosclerotic disease should have their cardiovascular risk factors measured.

Available Online through Research Article

Comparative in-vitro bioequivalence analysis of some brands of ciprofloxacin HCl tablets marketed in Ethiopia

Development and Validation of Lercanidipine Hydrochloride and Atenolol by Using RP-HPLC and UV Spectroscopy

Pharmaceutical Studies on Formulation and Evaluation of Sustained Release Tablets Containing Certain Drugs

Amlodipine/olmesartan (Azor ) is indicated for the treatment of hypertension, alone or in combination with other antihypertensive medications.

VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension - Pocket Guide Update 2004 Revision July 2005

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2015, 7(5): Research Article

for Methotrexate. The result of analysis has been validated statistically and recovery studies confirmed the accuracy of

HYPERTENSION IN CKD. LEENA ONGAJYOOTH, M.D., Dr.med RENAL UNIT SIRIRAJ HOSPITAL

Transcription:

DHR International Journal Of Pharmaceutical Sciences (DHR-IJPS) ISSN: 2278-8328, Vol. 5, Issue 3, 2014 Available online http://www.doublehelixresearch.com/dhrijps Double Helix Research Abstract Original Article Comparative Study of Four Different Brands of Lisinopril Available In Karachi Safila Naveed *, Huma Dilshad and Fakhra Khalid Faculty of Pharmacy of Pharmacy, Jinnah University for Women, Karachi, Pakistan *Corresponding Author: Safila Naveed Lisinopril is the orally active inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme. It blocks conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II and used for hyper tension as a potent vasodilator. Lisinopril used to lower hyper tension and available in several brands in the market. The aim of this study to establish pharmaceutical equivalence among the brands available in Karachi, Pakistan. Four different brands of Lisinopril tablets (10 mg) were included in study. Six quality control parameters: weight variation test, hardness test, thickness, friability, disintegration test and dissolution test were carried out specified by British and United state Pharmacopoeia BP/USP. Hardness value requirement was complied by all brands.disintegration time for all brands was within 15 minutes complying the BP/USP standards. All brands of lisinopril showed more than 80 % drug release within forty five 45 minutes. The study suggest that all the brands of lisinopril are available in Karachi meet the specification for quality control analysis. Key words: Lisinopril, formulations, comparative study. Introduction Lisinopril is an oral long acting ACE inhibitor and has a synthetic peptide derivative which is chemically represented by (S) 1 [N2 (1 Carboxy 3 phenyl propyl) L lysyl} L proline dehydrate with empirical formula of C21H31N3O5.2H2O having molecular weight of 441.53. [1]Its chemical structure is; 117

It is used as a fundamental medicines in the treatment of Hypertension which is the most commonly disease nowadays. Lisinopril is mostly used in the following diseases includes: Mild to moderate hypertension (Essential Hypertension). Symptomatic & asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction Post myocardial infarction Renal failure & diabetic nephropathy. [2] Lisinopril administered orally in a daily dose of 2.5 to 40mg. The bioavailability is between 25-30% & needed 6 hours to reach the maximum plasma concentration. It is not metabolized by the liver & is strongly binds to plasma protein. The absorbed drug is eliminated in urine as an unchanged drug. The rate of absorption of this drug does not affected in presence of foods. ACE inhibitor is used with diuretic in combination because diuretic activates the renin-angiotensin system due to which loss of potassium level occur. So ACE inhibitor maintained the level of potassium in body. [3]Used as a conjunctive treatment with diuretic & Beta-blocker or Calcium channel blocker in patients with CHF. It is more effective drug in white younger patients as compared to black patients. [4] Lisinopril tablets work by the following mechanism of action;it inhibits the ACE inhibitor that catalyzes the conversion of angiotensin-i to angiotensin-ii (vasoconstrictor peptide). This vasoconstrictor substance stimulates the aldosterone secretion by adrenal cortex. Due to this, the renin-angiotensinaldosterone system suppresses which results in decrease plasma angiotensin II which leads to decrease vasopressor activity & also decrease aldosterone secretion. [5] Lisinopril also inactivates the bradykinin (a vasodilator) causes vasodilation and decrease aldosterone secretion thus improves endothelial function & reduced left ventricular mass leading to cardio protective effect. [5]In those patients which have a decreased renal function & proteinuria may slow the rate of disease progression by altering intraglomerular pressure & reduce the mediators of glomerular & tubular hypertrophy resulting in decrease systemic blood pressure of the human body. [5]Angioedema may occur if patient has acute dyspnea.[6].literature survey reveals that there are many methods have been develop and validated for lisinopril and there interaction studies but no such type of study has been found[7-13]. MATERIALS & METHODOLOGY The significantly use of Lisinopril needs to monitor the quality of different brands available in market. The aim of the study is to evaluate the various physico-chemical parameters of different brands of lisinopril tablets were assessed by the evaluation of official & non-official standards like weight variation, hardness, thickness, friability, disintegration and dissolution with the specifications of USP. 118

MATERIALS Four different brands of Lisinopril tablets were purchased from the market in Karachi & check the Batch Number and Manufacturing/Expiry date. All brands randomly marked as LIS-01, LIS-02, and LIS-03 & LIS- 04. The labeled active ingredient is 5mg of Lisinopril. The reagent i.e. utilized includes Hydrochloric Acid 0.1N. METHODS Weight Variation Test:- Twenty tablets from each brand are randomly selected and weighed individually by using an AD Electronic weighing balance (FX-400) & average weight for each brand was conducted as per official specification and record the results. Hardness Test:- The Ten Tables from each brands randomly selected was determined by using Hardness tester (MH-1 Tablet Hardness Tester) & obtained the hardness value of each tablet in kg. Finally the average hardness was calculated and record the results. Thickness Test:- The Thickness of ten tablets from each brand was measured by using Vernier caliper and calculates the average thickness of each brand and also records the results. Friability Test:- Ten tablets from each brand selected & weigh them individually (initial weight) & transfer the tablets to friabilator (FB-1004) at 25 rpm for four minutes (100 revolutions). Then tablets were again weighed (final weight) & compare them with their initial weights & percent of friability was conducted as per specification and record the results. Disintegration Test:- The disintegration test was performed on 6 tablets of each brand by using disintegration Curio apparatus (DS-0702). Select the 6 tablets from each brand and put them in an each tube of basket rack then kept it in a 800ml beaker of water medium at 37 0 C and then record the disintegration time i.e. the time was taken when no minute particles of ant tablet was left on the mesh. Dissolution Test:- The dissolution test on tablets from each brand was carried out using Tablet Dissolution Apparatus Basket Type (GDT-7L from Galvano Scientific). In this method, place the volume of dissolution medium containing 900ml HCL 0.1N in a beaker and equilibrate the medium at 37 0 C. Then put the tablet of each brand in a beaker and operate the 119

apparatus at 50rpm on different time interval i.e. 0minute, 15minute, 30minute and 45minute. At the end of time interval, inject the 10ml volume of a sample at specified intervals and analyzed the sample by using UV Visible spectrophotometer at 215nm and note the absorbance of each of the withdrawn sample and calculate the concentration of drug in the samples as per Lisinopril monograph. GENERAL TABLE:- No. NAME OF THE PRODUCT SERIAL No. CODE No. BATCH No. 1. ZESTRIL LIS-01* 012350 0335 2. TRUPRIL LIS-02 022022 063T25 3. NOVATEC LIS-03 012852 D148 4. LAME 5 LIS-04 026225 13007 WEIGHT VARIATION:- TABLE 1:- No. Serial No. Batch No. Average weight (mg) S.D Upper limit (UCL)(X+3S) Lower limit (LCL)(X- 3S) 1. LIS-01* 0335 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 2. LIS-02 063T25 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 3. LIS-03 D148 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 4. LIS-04 13007 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 TABLE 2:- LIS-01* Tablet Weight (mg) Mean Standard Deviation Upper Class Limit Lower Class Limit Comment 1 103 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 2 103 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 3 108 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 4 105 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 5 105 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 6 106 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 7 106 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 120

8 103 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 9 108 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 10 103 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 11 106 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 12 104 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 13 103 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 14 105 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 15 106 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 16 107 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 17 106 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 18 105 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 19 107 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK 20 107 105.3 1.688974 110.366922 100.233078 OK LIS-02 Tablet Weight (mg) Mean Standard Deviation Upper Class Limit Lower Class Limit Comment 1 95 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 2 97 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 3 110 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 4 91 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 5 99 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 6 98 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 7 95 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 8 99 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 9 98 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 10 99 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 121

11 99 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 12 99 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 13 97 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 14 98 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 15 97 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 16 98 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 17 96 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 18 99 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 19 95 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK 20 97 97.8 3.503382 108.310146 87.289854 OK LIS-03 Tablet Weight (mg) Mean Standard Deviation Upper Class Limit Lower Class Limit Comment 1 107 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 2 105 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 3 106 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 4 101 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 5 102 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 6 101 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 7 104 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 8 107 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 9 104 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 10 103 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 11 103 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 12 103 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 122

13 107 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 14 106 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 15 102 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 16 101 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 17 102 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 18 101 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 19 104 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK 20 103 103.6 2.112619 109.937857 97.262143 OK LIS-04 Tablet Weight (mg) Mean Standard Deviation Upper Class Limit Lower Class Limit Comment 1 148 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 2 150 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 3 150 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 4 151 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 5 144 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 6 147 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 7 150 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 8 142 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 9 150 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 10 150 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 11 145 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 12 150 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 13 149 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 14 144 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 15 148 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 16 144 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 17 143 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 123

18 144 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 19 144 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK 20 143 139.3 3.088178 148.564534 130.035466 OK TABLE 3:- Serial No. Code No Batch No Results in gm. Official Specs. Official Deviation Limit LIS-01* 012350 0335 0.1053 ±7.5% Within limit LIS-02 022022 063T25 0.0978 ±7.5% Within limit LIS-03 012852 D148 0.1036 ±7.5% Within limit LIS-04 026225 13007 0.1393 ±7.5% Within limit HARDNESS:- TABLE 1:- Serial No. Code No. Batch No. Average Hardness (Kg) S.D Upper Limit(UCL)(X+3S) Lower Limit(LCL)(X-3S) LIS-01* 012350 0335 3.915 0.517 5.466 2.364 LIS-02 022022 063T25 6.859 0.478 8.293 5.425 LIS-03 012852 D148 7.895 0.956 10.76 5.027 LIS-04 026225 13007 4.108 0.636 6.016 2.20 TABLE 2:- LIS-01* TAB1 TAB2 TAB3 TAB4 TAB5 TAB6 TAB7 TAB8 TAB9 TAB10 HARDNESS (Kg) 3.34 3.37 4.63 4.13 3.26 4.64 4.37 3.87 3.87 3.67 MEAN 3.915 3.915 3.915 3.915 3.915 3.915 3.915 3.915 3.915 3.915 SD 0.517 0.517 0.517 0.517 0.517 0.517 0.517 0.517 0.517 0.517 X+3S 5.466 5.466 5.466 5.466 5.466 5.466 5.466 5.466 5.466 5.466 X-3S 2.364 2.364 2.364 2.364 2.364 2.364 2.364 2.364 2.364 2.364 124

LIS-02 TAB1 TAB2 TAB3 TAB4 TAB5 TAB6 TAB7 TAB8 TAB9 TAB10 HARDNESS (Kg) 7.75 7.16 7.15 7.26 6.56 7.04 6.32 6.55 6.37 6.43 MEAN 6.859 6.859 6.859 6.859 6.859 6.859 6.859 6.859 6.859 6.859 SD 0.478 0.478 0.478 0.478 0.478 0.478 0.478 0.478 0.478 0.478 X+3S 8.293 8.293 8.293 8.293 8.293 8.293 8.293 8.293 8.293 8.293 X-3S 5.425 5.425 5.425 5.425 5.425 5.425 5.425 5.425 5.425 5.425 LIS-03 TAB1 TAB2 TAB3 TAB4 TAB5 TAB6 TAB7 TAB8 TAB9 TAB10 HARDNESS (Kg) 7.67 8.87 8.67 6.95 6.59 7.50 9.42 8.75 7.14 7.39 MEAN 7.895 7.895 7.895 7.895 7.895 7.895 7.895 7.895 7.895 7.895 SD 0.956 0.956 0.956 0.956 0.956 0.956 0.956 0.956 0.956 0.956 X+3S 10.76 10.76 10.76 10.76 10.76 10.76 10.76 10.76 10.76 10.76 X-3S 5.027 5.027 5.027 5.027 5.027 5.027 5.027 5.027 5.027 5.027 LIS-04 TAB1 TAB2 TAB3 TAB4 TAB5 TAB6 TAB7 TAB8 TAB9 TAB10 HARDNESS (Kg) 3.67 3.29 4.37 3.38 3.79 3.62 4.36 5.06 4.77 4.77 MEAN 4.108 4.108 4.108 4.108 4.108 4.108 4.108 4.108 4.108 4.108 SD 0.636 0.636 0.636 0.636 0.636 0.636 0.636 0.636 0.636 0.636 X+3S 6.016 6.016 6.016 6.016 6.016 6.016 6.016 6.016 6.016 6.016 X-3S 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 125

THICKNESS:- TABLE1:- Serial No. Code No. Batch No. TABLE 2:- Average Thickness (mm) S.D Upper Limit(UCL)(X+3S) Lower Limit(LCL)(X-3S) LIS-01* 012350 0335 0.253 0.010593 0.284779 0.221221 LIS-02 022022 063T25 0.233 0.00483 0.24749 0.21851 LIS-03 012852 D148 0.207 0.00483 0.22149 0.19251 LIS-04 026225 13007 0.344 0.006992 0.364976 0.323024 LIS-01* TAB1 TAB2 TAB3 TAB4 TAB5 TAB6 TAB7 TAB8 TAB9 TAB10 THICKNESS (mm) 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.25 0.25 0.24 MEAN 0.253 0.253 0.253 0.253 0.253 0.253 0.253 0.253 0.253 0.253 SD 0.0105 0.0105 0.0105 0.0105 0.0105 0.0105 0.0105 0.0105 0.0105 0.0105 X+3S 0.284 0.284 0.284 0.284 0.284 0.284 0.284 0.284 0.284 0.284 X-3S 0.221 0.221 0.221 0.221 0.221 0.221 0.221 0.221 0.221 0.221 LIS-02 TAB1 TAB2 TAB3 TAB4 TAB5 TAB6 TAB7 TAB8 TAB9 TAB10 THICKNESS (mm) 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.23 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.24 MEAN 0.233 0.233 0.233 0.233 0.233 0.233 0.233 0.233 0.233 0.233 SD 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 X+3S 0.247 0.247 0.247 0.247 0.247 0.247 0.247 0.247 0.247 0.247 X-3S 0.218 0.218 0.218 0.218 0.218 0.218 0.218 0.218 0.218 0.218 126

LIS-03 TAB1 TAB2 TAB3 TAB4 TAB5 TAB6 TAB7 TAB8 TAB9 TAB10 THICKNESS (mm) 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 MEAN 0.207 0.207 0.207 0.207 0.207 0.207 0.207 0.207 0.207 0.207 SD 0.0048 0.0048 0.0048 0.0048 0.0048 0.0048 0.0048 0.0048 0.0048 0.0048 X+3S 0.221 0.221 0.221 0.221 0.221 0.221 0.221 0.221 0.221 0.221 X-3S 0.1925 0.1925 0.1925 0.1925 0.1925 0.1925 0.1925 0.1925 0.1925 0.1925 FRIABILITY:- Serial No. Code No. Batch No. Initial weight (gm.) Final Weight (gm.) Friability % Official Limits Comments LIS-01* 012350 0335 1.053 1.052 0.0949 Not more than 1% LIS-02 022022 063T25 0.972 0.969 0.308 Not more than 1% LIS-03 012852 D148 1.053 1.051 0.189 Not more than 1% Within specified limit Within specified limit Within specified limit TAB1 TAB2 TAB3 TAB4 TAB5 TAB6 TAB7 TAB8 TAB9 TAB10 THICKNESS (mm) 0.35 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.34 0.35 0.34 0.35 MEAN 0.344 0.344 0.344 0.344 0.344 0.344 0.344 0.344 0.344 0.344 SD 0.0069 0.0069 0.0069 0.0069 0.0069 0.0069 0.0069 0.0069 0.0069 0.0069 X+3S 0.3649 0.3649 0.3649 0.3649 0.3649 0.3649 0.3649 0.3649 0.3649 0.3649 X-3S 0.3230 0.3230 0.3230 0.3230 0.3230 0.3230 0.3230 0.3230 0.3230 0.3230 127

LIS-04 026225 13007 1.470 1.468 0.136 Not more than 1% DISINTEGRATION:- Within specified limit TABLE 1:- GENERAL TABLE Serial No. Code No. Batch No. Disintegration Time Official Limits Comments LIS-01* 012350 0335 9mint 58sec Not more than 15min Within specified limit LIS-02 022022 063T25 12mint Not more than 15min Within specified limit LIS-03 012852 D148 7mint Not more than 15min Within specified limit LIS-04 026225 13007 9mint 30sec Not more than 15min Within specified limit DISSOLUTION:- TABLE 1:- ABSORBANCE AT DIFFERENT TIME INTERVAL AT 215 WAVELENGTHS:- No. Serial No. Absorbance of drug at 215nm 0min 15min 30min 45min 1 LIS-01* 0.225 0.320 0.420 0.421 2 LIS-02 0.202 0.309 0.409 0.410 3 LIS-03 0.185 0.300 0.402 0.403 4 LIS-04 0.195 0.295 0.408 0.409 TABLE 2:- OFFICIAL LIMITS AT 215nm No. Serial No Batch No % Dissolution at 30min Official Specs. Deviation Limit 1. LIS-02 063T25 97.380% Not less than 80% Within specified limit 2. LIS-03 D148 95.714% Not less than 80% Within specified limit 3. LIS-04 13007 97.142% Not less than 80% Within specified limit RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:- The results of the invitro quality control parameters of four different brands of Lisinopril 5mg tablets were performed and three brands i.e. LIS-02, LIS-03, LIS-04 were compared with the brand of multinational considered as standard i.e. LIS-01*. The physico-chemical parameters like weight variation, disintegration, friability and dissolution have official standard to assess the quality of tablets. 128

Weight variation of Table-1 have different brands of Lisinopril tablets, average weight and standard deviation. For comparison and accuracy of tablets, we use standard deviation against the weight of tablets. The brand 2 (LIS-02) has high standard deviation as compared to other brands of Lisinopril but all the brands I.e. LIS-01, LIS-02, LIS-03 & LIS-04 complies within the official specifications i.e. shown in Table-3 which states that none of the brands deviated by up to +7.5% from the mean value. The hardness and thickness of 10 tablets from each brand was measured and calculate their standard deviation and average hardness and thickness of each brand were noted in Table 1 of hardness and thickness respectively. The average hardness and thickness of all brands found to be in the limit of 3.91 to 7.85 kg and 0.20 to 0.34mm respectively. The brand 2 i.e. LIS-02 has low value of standard deviation and brand 3 i.e. LIS-03 has high value of standard deviation of hardness. The brand 2 & 3 (LIS-02 & LIS-03) have low value of standard deviation but LIS-01 has high value of standard deviation that is considered as standard. The friability of the tablets should not be more than 1% i.e. official limit. All the brands of Lisinopril tablets are found in limits. Brand LIS-01 has minimum friability of 0.0949% while brand LIS-03 has maximum friability of 0.189% but both are within the limit. The disintegration test of the all brands of Lisinopril tablets complies within the official specification i.e. showed in Table 1 because in BP un-coated tablets should be disintegrate within 15 minutes but in USP both un-coated and film coated tablets should be disintegrate within 30 minutes. The result of dissolution test of all the brands of Lisinopril i.e. shown in Table 1 complies within the official specification and passed the test as per monograph in BP and USP which states that the amount of drug release (Active ingredient) in solution should not be less than 80% of the labeled amount at 30minutes. In this study, we concluded that all the four brands of Lisinopril shows remarkable results and also in range in all of the Physico-chemical comparison of different brands of the Lisinopril. Reference:- 1. NAGHAM A. JASIMa, ADLA A. SALOMI* and FADHIL M. ABIDa Int. J. Chem. Sci.: 8(4), 2010, 2808-2814. 2. Krisztina Takacs-Novak, Katalin Deak, Szabolcs Beni, Gergely Volgyi ADMET & DMPK 1(2) (2013) 6-16; doi: 10.5599/admet.1.2.3 129

http://pub.iapchem.org/ojs/index.php/admet/article/view/3/7.received: January 7th, 2013; Revised: February 1st, 2013; Published: February 15th, 2013. 3. M.Inam Danish Medical Diagnosis and Management edition 2012, page. No. 43. 4. Stephen J.Mcphee A.Papadakis Current Medical Diagnosis and Treatment Mc Grew Hill LANGE, 2011 VOl 01, Fifteen Edition, Page.No.435. 5. Peter Hamilton & David Hui, Second edition 2006; Drugs and Drugs: A Practical guide to the safe use of common drugs in adults ISBN 1-55195-200-9, from page # 46. British National Formulary, September 2011, Page.No.116. 6. Sultana N, Arayne MS and Safila Naveed (2011) Validated Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Lisinopril, Pravastatin, Atorvastatin and Rosuvastatin in API, Formulations and Human Serum by RP-HPLC Chinese Journal of Chemistry 29, 1216-1220.DOI: 10.1002/cjoc.201190226. 7. Safila Naveed, Sultana N and Arayne MS (2012) Simultaneous Determination of Lisinopril and H 2 Antagonists in Bulk, Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Human Serum by RP-HPLC 4542-4548 (7) DOI 10.1007/s00044-011-9939-z. 8. Sultana N, Arayne MS, Siddiqui R and Safila Naveed (2012) RP-HPLC Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Lisinopril and NSAIDs In Bulk, Formulations and Human Serum. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry) 3, 147-152 doi:10.4236/ajac.2012.32021 Published Online February 2012 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ajac). 9. Arayne MS, Sultana N, Arman Tabassum Saeeda Nadir Ali and Safila Naveed (2012). Simultaneous LC Determination of Rosuvastatin, Lisinopril, Captopril, and Enalapril in API, Pharmaceutical Dosage Formulations, and Human Serum Medicinal Chemistry Research 21:4542-4548 DOI 10.1007/s00044-012-9997-x http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2fs00044-012-9997-x#page-1 10. Sultana N, Naveed Safila, Arayne MS (2013) Direct Determination of Four ACE-Inhibitors Lisinopril, Enalapril, Captopril and Fosinopril in Pharmaceuticals and Serum by HPLC. J Chromat Separation Techniq 4: 179.5pg doi:10.4172/2157-7064.1000179 11. Arayne MS, Safila Naveed, Sultana N (2013) RP-HPLC Method for the Determination of isinopril in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients, Dosage Forms and Human Serum. 3: 832. doi: 10.4172/scientificreports.832 Modern Chemistry & Applications 12. Safila Naveed, Najma Sultana, and Saeed Arayne M (2014) Facile and Manifest RPHPLC Method for the Determination of Captpril, Lisiopril, Enalpril and Diclofenac sodium: Its Applications in 130

Dosage formulations and in human serum Can J App Sci; Issue 2; Vol. 4: 40-50; ISSN 1925-7430; Available online http://www.cjasci.com http://cajaps.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/safila.pdf 131