CANCER PROGRAM Annual Report. Cancer Registry Database 2008 CANCER CASES AND BREAST CANCER SITE OUTCOMES ANALYSIS

Similar documents
Cancer Program Report 2014

2011 to 2015 New Cancer Incidence Truman Medical Center - Hospital Hill

Truman Medical Center-Hospital Hill Cancer Registry 2014 Statistical Summary Incidence

Outcomes Report: Accountability Measures and Quality Improvements

Outcomes Report: Accountability Measures and Quality Improvements

Epidemiology in Texas 2006 Annual Report. Cancer

Cancer in New Mexico 2017

Cancer in New Mexico 2014

LANDMARK MEDICAL CENTER CANCER PROGRAM YEAR IN REVIEW 2013

Greater Baltimore Medical Center Sandra & Malcolm Berman Cancer Institute

*

American Cancer Society Estimated Cancer Deaths by Sex and Age (years), 2013

Estimated Minnesota Cancer Prevalence, January 1, MCSS Epidemiology Report 04:2. April 2004

Cancer Center 2010 Annual Report

THE BURDEN OF CANCER IN NEBRASKA: RECENT INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY DATA

Annual Report. Cape Cod Hospital and Falmouth Hospital Regional Cancer Network Expert physicians. Quality hospitals. Superior care.

Message from the President & CEO John Solheim, FACHE

ANNUAL CANCER REGISTRY REPORT-2005

CANYON COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

Florida Cancer Data System STAT File Documentation Version 2019

A Time- and Resource-Efficient Method for Annually Auditing All Reporting Hospitals in Your State: the Inpatient & Outpatient Hospital Discharge Files

BINGHAM COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

NEZ PERCE COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

KOOTENAI COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

TWIN FALLS COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

JEROME COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

BUTTE COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

LINCOLN COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

2015 Patient Outcomes Report

The Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry Annual Report: Incidence and Mortality Review,

Cancer in Estonia 2014

NEZ PERCE COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

KOOTENAI COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

BOUNDARY COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

PROMEDICA MONROE REGIONAL HOSPITAL Annual Report

ADAMS COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

National Cancer Statistics in Korea, 2014

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Cancer. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2006 December 17.

Gary M. Levin, BA, CTR FCDS Annual Conference 7/26/2017

BONNER COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

The Cancer Burden in California. Janet Bates MD MPH California Cancer Registry California Department of Public Health April 25, 2012

Cancer in Utah: An Overview of Cancer Incidence and Mortality from

Chapter II: Overview

Cancer in Ontario. 1 in 2. Ontarians will develop cancer in their lifetime. 1 in 4. Ontarians will die from cancer

CANCER FACTS & FIGURES For African Americans

2016 CANCER PROGRAM REPORT. Bay Medical Sacred Heart Health System 615 North Bonita Avenue Panama City, FL

Key Words. Cancer statistics Incidence Lifetime risk Multiple primaries Survival SEER

Cancer prevalence. Chapter 7

Evaluation of Ancestry Information Markers (AIMs) from Previous ACOSOG/CALGB/NCCTG Trials

2017 CANCER REPORT. with data from 2016

Construction of a North American Cancer Survival Index to Measure Progress of Cancer Control Efforts

Samuel M. Lesko, MD, MPH Director of Research/Medical Director

2016 Oncology Institute Annual Report

Tools, Reports, and Resources

What is the Impact of Cancer on African Americans in Indiana? Average number of cases per year. Rate per 100,000. Rate per 100,000 people*

REPORT American College of Surgeons Approved Program

Cancer Dispari,es in Indiana

2015 Cancer Program Annual Report. Based on 2015 Cancer Program Activities and 2014 Cancer Registry Data

The San Francisco Cancer Initiative SF-CAN

2016 Cancer Registry Annual Report

SFMC Breast Cancer Site Study: 2011

Cancer in Colorado Incidence, Mortality, and Survival

The New CP 3 R Application And Revisions To Standard 4.6 Integration Of The NCDB With The Accreditation Process

Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, , Featuring Survival Questions and Answers

CANCER IN IRELAND with estimates for : ANNUAL REPORT OF THE NATIONAL CANCER REGISTRY

Cancer survival in Seoul, Republic of Korea,

HUNT CANCER INSTITUTE CANCER SERVICES REPORT 2014

John R. Marsh Cancer Center

APPENDIX ONE: ICD CODES

Overview of Gynecologic Cancers in New Jersey

Cancer Program Annual Report 2015

CANCER CARE CENTER 2011 Annual Report

Cancer in Rural Illinois, Incidence, Mortality, Staging, and Access to Care. April 2014

Cancer in Northeastern Pennsylvania: Incidence and Mortality of Common Cancers

Cancer in Northeastern Pennsylvania: Incidence and Mortality of Common Cancers

Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, , with a Special Feature Regarding Survival

Phase-specific Costs of Cancer Care in Ontario

A B ING TON HO SPITAL J E F F E R SO N H E ALTH 2018 ANNUAL REPORT CANCER

Shore Medical Center Site-Specific Study: Colorectal Cancer 2013

Cancer incidence and mortality patterns among specific Asian and Pacific Islander populations in the U.S.

2016 Public Outcomes Report

Oncology Centre Research Unit TUMOR REGISTRY

WLH Tumor Frequencies between cohort enrollment and 31-Dec Below the Women Lifestyle and Health tumor frequencies are tabulated according to:

Cancer A Superficial Introduction

FINALIZED SEER SINQ S MAY 2012

WLH Tumor Frequencies between cohort enrollment and 31-Dec Below the Women Lifestyle and Health tumor frequencies are tabulated according to:

155.2 Malignant neoplasm of liver not specified as primary or secondary. C22.9 Malignant neoplasm of liver, not specified as primary or secondary

Cancer in Central and South America BOLIVIA

Cancer in Northeastern Pennsylvania: Incidence and Mortality of Common Cancers

Evolution of CoC within ACoS. American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Current Activities and Future Initiatives November 5,2005

AN EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF PERIOD SURVIVAL ANALYSIS USING DATA FROM THE CANADIAN CANCER REGISTRY. Larry F. Ellison MSc, Statistics Canada

Cancer Facts & Figures

2009 Cancer Program Annual Report

Phase-specific Net Costs of Cancer Care in Ontario. Claire de Oliveira, M.A. PhD

Patient Identification Quiz

Cancer survival in Shanghai, China,

Alabama Cancer Facts & Figures 2009

Aviva Group Protection Our guide to cancer

Comprehensive cancer cover

Transcription:

CANCER PROGRAM 2009 Annual Report Cancer Registry Database 2008 CANCER CASES AND BREAST CANCER SITE OUTCOMES ANALYSIS 1

2008 Annual Report - Site Table Site Total Class Sex AJCC TNM Collaborative Stage Group Cases Analytic NonAna M F Stage 0 Stage I Stage II Stage III Stage IV N/A Unk ALL SITES 743 637 106 417 326 34 158 181 85 96 67 16 HEAD & NECK 20 17 3 18 2 0 2 4 5 5 1 0 DIGESTIVE SYSTEM ESOPHAGUS 6 4 2 5 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 STOMACH 6 5 1 5 1 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 COLON/RECTUM 50 43 7 31 19 2 16 7 7 11 0 0 ANUS, ANORECTUM 8 7 1 4 4 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 LIVER 13 10 3 10 3 0 3 0 1 4 0 2 PANCREAS 23 19 4 11 12 0 6 1 3 8 0 1 OTHER GI 5 4 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM NASAL CAVITY,SINUS 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 LARYNX 11 11 0 9 2 0 5 3 2 1 0 0 LUNG SMALL CELL 9 8 1 5 4 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 LUNG - NON-SMALL CELL 91 80 11 56 35 0 24 3 21 31 1 0 PLEURA 2 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 BONE/SOFT TISSUE 10 7 3 6 4 0 0 1 1 4 0 1 BREAST 115 106 9 2 113 17 49 28 9 0 0 3 SKIN MELANOMA 5 4 1 3 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 OTHER SKIN 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM CERVIX UTERI 11 9 2 0 11 0 2 2 4 0 0 1 CORPUS UTERI 13 12 1 0 13 1 4 1 4 0 0 2 OVARY 10 7 3 0 10 0 1 0 2 3 0 1 OTHER FEMALE 2 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 MALE GENITAL SYSTEM PROSTATE 135 122 13 135 0 0 0 109 6 6 0 1 OTHER MALE 5 3 2 5 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 URINARY SYSTEM BLADDER 27 21 6 22 5 13 3 2 3 0 0 0 KIDNEY/ RENAL PELVIS 34 29 5 26 8 0 20 3 3 2 0 1 OTHER URINARY 2 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 BRAIN & NERVOUS SYSTEM 26 25 1 7 19 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 THYROID/ENDOCRINE 17 13 4 5 12 0 5 1 1 1 4 1 HEMIC and LYMPHATIC LEUKEMIA 18 11 7 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 MYELOMA 4 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 OTHER HEMATOPOIETIC 16 7 9 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 HODGKIN S DISEASE 4 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPH 31 30 1 18 13 0 12 5 1 10 0 2 UNKNOWN 10 9 1 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 N/A = Not Applicable Unk = Unknown 2

2008 CASES Distribution by Top Primary Sites All Other Sites, 26% n = 743 cases PROSTATE, 18% LEUKEMIA, PANCREAS, 3% BRAIN/NERVOUS SYSTEM, 3% BLADDER, 4% BREAST, NON-HODGKINS, 4% KIDNEY, 5% COLORECTAL, 7% LUNG NON SM CELL, 1 DISTRIBUTION BY GENDER MALE 56% FEMALE 44% 2008 - CITY AT DIAGNOSIS TOTAL NAPA 382 VALLEJO 69 VACAVILLE 57 YOUNTVILLE 56 AMERICAN CANYON 36 SAINT HELENA 24 CALISTOGA 17 FAIRFIELD 14 BENICIA 12 SONOMA 11 REPRESA 8 LOWER LAKE 5 CLEARLAKE 5 ANGWIN 4 HIDDEN VALLEY LAKE 4 SACRAMENTO 2 SANTA ROSA 3 SAN FRANCISCO 3 SUISUN CITY 2 RUTHERFORD 2 MIDDLETOWN 2 CLEARLAKE OAKS 2 All Cities with 1 Patient 23 TOTAL 743 6 5 4 3 1 Dx here rx elsewhere 2008 Class of Case 51% 3 14% Dx & rx here Rx here Rx elsewhere 3

2008 - Insurance Category 3 n = 743 All Cases 26% 29% 25% 1 1 8% 8% 5% 5% Self pay (not insured) Insurance nos Calif State Prison System Managed care (HMO/PPO) Kaiser Medicaid Medicare Medicare with supplement Distribution by Race/Ethnicity HISPANIC 11% WHITE 79% BLACK 5% AM INDIAN FILIPINO Other ASIAN 1% OTHER 1% UNKNOWN 1% AGE at DIAGNOSIS 2-4 years 0.1 20-29 years 1.5 30-39 years 40-49 years 9% 50-59 years 19% 60-69 years 26% 70-79 years 2 80-89 years 90-99 years unknown Mean 65 Median 66 n= 743 cases 4

2008 Analytic Cases Stage at Diagnosis Not Applicable, 11% Unknown, 3% Stage 0, 5% Stage I, 25% Stage IV, Stage III, 13% Stage II, 28% n=637 Analytic Cases Top 15 Histology/Grades ADENOCARCINOMA(42.1%) 199 INFILTRATING DUCT CA(14.) 67 SQ CELL CA(12.7%) 60 RENAL CELL CA(3.8%) 18 MALIGNANCY NOS(3.6%) 17 MENINGIOMA NOS(3.4%) 16 PAP TRANS CELL CA NON-INV(3%) 14 CARCINOMA NON-SMALL CELL(2.7%) 13 DUCTAL & LOBULAR CA(2.5%) 12 CARCINOMA NOS(2.5%) 12 LYMPHOMA LG B-CLL DIF NOS(2.3%) 11 PAPILLARY ADENOCA(1.9%) 9 LOBULAR CA(1.9%) 9 ENDOMETRIOID CA(1.7%) 8 TRANS CELL CA(1.7%) 8 Diagnostic Confirmation POS HISTOL (88.) 562 CYTOLOGY (2.) 14 POS LAB/MARKER (0.) 1 VISUALIZATION (0.) 1 RADIOGR ONLY (8.6%) 55 CLINICAL ONLY (0.6%) 4 TNM/CS Mixed by 1st Course Rx Summary - 2008 Analytic Cases Stage Stage I Stage Stage Stage Not Unknown TOTAL 0 II III IV Applicable None 0 18 2 8 16 32 6 82 S Only 22 60 52 11 7 4 4 160 R Only 0 8 44 3 11 3 0 69 C Only 0 2 2 4 20 5 0 33 H Only 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 O Only 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 S+R 7 21 10 3 5 3 0 49 S+C 1 3 6 11 8 3 1 33 S+H 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 5 R+C 0 4 8 26 15 5 2 60 R+H 0 0 31 3 3 0 1 38 C+H 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 4 C+O 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 S+R+C 1 7 15 11 5 4 1 44 S+R+H 2 22 3 1 0 0 0 28 S+C+H 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 4 R+C+H 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 S+R+C+H 0 7 6 3 1 0 0 17 S+R+H+T 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 R+C+H+O 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 TOTAL 34 158 181 85 96 67 16 637 5

CANCER PROGRAM 2009 Annual Report Site Specific Breast Cancer Study 2008 Breast Cancer Overview 6

Introduction: This overview provides an analysis of 102 new breast cancer cases seen in 2008 at Queen of the Valley Medical Center (QVMC) and the facility s experience compared to the National Cancer Data Base breast cancer data in TNM Staging and survival patterns. An overview of 2008 Cancer Statistics was provided to the Cancer Committee at their December 9, 2009 meeting. The Committee asked for an in-depth detailed analysis of breast cancer data including comparison of the number of patients receiving lumpectomy vs. mastectomy treatment by stage. This analysis was presented back to the Committee and included the following graphs for discussion on race-ethnicity, age at diagnosis, stage at diagnosis, histology, and first course of treatment. The Committee was pleased that 9 of the 2008 breast cancer patients were diagnosed at early stage disease (Stages 0-II) at QVMC and treated with breast conserving surgery. They noted that this has remained true since the previous breast cancer study several years ago. Overview: One of the most startling facts in understanding breast cancer is that an estimated 182,460 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be identified in women in the year 2008 in the United States. Breast cancer has continued to grow in incidence; however, incidence rates declined by 3.5 % from 2001 to 2004. This may be reflective of the reduced use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) following the publication of results from Women s Health Initiative in 2002, which linked HRT use to increased risk of heart diseases and breast cancers. 1 At QVMC, breast cancer is the leading primary site for women where 47% are diagnosed and treated here and an additional 53% of women sought ongoing treatment at QVMC. The overall median age group is 61 years of age at diagnosis with 55% of patients between the ages of 50-69 years. Ninety-eight percent were female and two percent male breast cancers. The breast population was Caucasian at 75%, 15 % Hispanic and another 1 of the cases accounted for other races/ethnicities. Early cancer detection plays an important role in reducing the impact of breast cancer disease. Mammography is especially valuable as an early detection tool because it can identify breast cancer at an early stage, usually before physical symptoms develop. Numerous studies have shown that early detection saves lives and increases options for treatment according to the ACS Cancer Facts and Figures. Sixty-one percent of breast cancer patients diagnosed at QVMC are infiltrating ductal carcinomas, which corresponds to national histology types. For breast cancer patients diagnosed and treated (Class 1 only) at QVMC, 83% of women were seen at early stage diagnosis (Stage 0 to II) compared to NCDB at 84%. Only of QVMC patients were diagnosed with evidence of Stage III disease. Primary treatments for breast cancer include the standard surgery and surgery plus radiation plus or minus hormone therapy for early stage disease, as well as including chemotherapy, and radiation therapy being added for late stage disease as evidenced in the treatment table of patients seen at QVMC. Surgery alone is no longer the treatment of choice. Combined modalities of Surgery + Radiation and/or Hormones, or Surgery plus Radiation, Chemotherapy and/or Hormones accounted for 8 of the patients treated at QVMC. Surgery plus chemotherapy and/or Hormones was also prescribed treatment modalities for 13% of the patients. Five-year survival outcomes for QVMC breast cancer can be found on page 7. Observed survival comparison is made to NCDB All states/us from 1,340 hospitals and California data from 102 hospitals versus 543 QVMC breast cancer patients. The five-year observed survival rates by stage (1998-2001) show that for all stages combined; QVMC is at 83% and comparable to NCDB at 84%. Stage III was slightly lower (QVMC=48%, NCDB, all programs = 56%). This was felt to be due to the low volume of QVMC cases for Stage III, twenty seven (27) patients. According to the American Cancer Society 2008 Facts and Figures on page 11, the 5-year relative survival for localized breast cancer (malignant cancer that has not spread to lymph nodes or other locations outside the breast) has increased from 8 in the 1950s to 98% today which is great news for breast cancer patients. 1 1. American Cancer Society Facts and Figures, 2009, 9-11 7

2008 Breast Cancer Cases Class of Case Class 2 = Rx Here 53% Class 1 = Dx & Rx Here 47% n = 102 Histology TOTAL Percentage Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma 62 61% Intraducal Carcinoma 15 Ductal & Lobular Carcinoma 12 1 Lobular Carcinoma 9 9% Mucinous Adenocarcinoma 2 1% Tubular Adenocarcinoma 1 1% Infiltrating Ductal Mixed with Other Carcinomas 1 1% Total 102 10 2008 Breast Cancer Gender 10 98% 5 Males Females n = 102 8

2008 Breast Cancer Age at Diagnosis 90-99 years 80-89 years 70-79 years 60-69 years 11% Median Age: 61 24% 50-59 years 31% 40-49 years 16% 30-39 years 5% 1 25% 3 35% 2008 Breast Breakdown by Race/Ethnicity HAWAIIAN 1% OTHER ASIAN 3% FILIPINO 6% WHITE 75% HISPANIC n = 102 analytic cases 9

2008 Breast Cancer TNM Stage at Diagnosis 5 47% 45% 4 35% 3 27% 25% 16% 1 5% 9% Stage 0 Stage I Stage II Stage III Unknown n = 102 First Course Treatment Summary None Chemotherapy/Hormone 1% Surgery 5% Surgery/Hormone 7% Surgery/Chemotherapy 3% Surgery/Chemotherapy/Hormone 3% Surgery/Radiation 18% Surgery/Radiation/Hormone 29% Surgery/Radiation Hormone/Transplant 1% Surgery/Radiation/Chemotherapy Surgery/Radiation/Chemotherapy/Hormone 17% Total 10 10

2008 Breast Cancer - Class 1 Only Early Stage Diagnosis ( Stage 0-II) Breast Conserving Surgery Rate = 83% 9 8 85% 9 No Surgery BCS Mastectomy 83% 7 6 63% 5 4 3 1 1 13% 25% Stage 0 Stage I Stage II Total Stage 0 - II No Surgery: 1 BCS: 34 Mastectomy: 6 Total: 41 2008 Breast Cancer - Class 1 Only Breast Conserving Surgery Vs Mastectomy 10 9 8 85% 9 No Surgery BCS Mastectomy 8 10 7 6 63% 5 4 3 1 1 13% 25% Stage 0 Stage I Stage II Stage III Stage IV Unknown Early Detection Stage 0 - II No Surgery: 1 BCS: 34 83% Mastectomy: 6 Total: 41 10 All Stages Stage 0 thru IV No Surgery: 3 6% BCS: 35 73% Mastectomy: 10 21% TOTAL: 48 100 11

10 9 8 7 95% 97% 95% 91% Breast Cancer 1998-2001 Five Year Observed Survival Rate by AJCC Stage All Stages Ending at Five Years 87% 91% 84% 8 81% 6 6 5 4 3 1 QVMC NCDB - CA - CoC Approved Programs NCDB- All States- CoC Approved Programs 48% 56% 25% 21% 19% Stage 0 Stage I Stage II Stage III Stage IV QVMC: n = 543 Cases, excludes unknown stages NCDB Data: California: n = 47,453 Cases from 102 hospitals NCDB Data: All States/US: n = 554,904 Cases from 1340 hospitals Stage 0 = 91 with 88 alive over 5 years Stage I = 263 with 227 alive over 5 years Stage II = 143 with 116 alive over 5 years Stage III = 27 with 13 alive over 5 years Stage IV = 12 with 3 alive over 5 years 12