PRIMARY. ConforMIS itotal G2 XE and itotal G2 (Bicondylar tray)

Similar documents
DePuy Attune CR and Attune PS. Contents Recorded Usage in NJR Patient and Procedure Details Revision and Survivorship APPENDIX A Component List

DePuy Attune CR and Attune PS. Contents Recorded Usage in NJR Patient and Procedure Details Revision and Survivorship APPENDIX A Component List

DePuy Attune CR and Attune PS

Produced on: Licenced for use until: Corail Stem (Standard Offset Collared)

Produced on: Licenced for use until: Corail Stem (Standard Offset Non-Collared)

Smith & Nephew. R3 Cementless Cup

DePuy Corail Collared vs. Collarless (ex MoM)

Smith & Nephew. Polarstem Cementless

REVISION. Zimmer Biomet All Trabecular Metal Cups vs. All non-tm cementless cups

Automated Industry Report 824 Depuy Synthes Australia Attune PS Total Knee

Automated Industry Report 823 Depuy Synthes Australia Attune CR Total Knee

AOANJRR Automated Industry Report Depuy Synthes Australia Attune PS Total Knee Data Period: 1 September August 2018

Scorpio NRG PS (cementless)/series 7000 (cementless) Total Knee Investigation

National Joint Replacement Registry. Outcomes of Classes No Longer Used Hip and Knee Arthroplasty SUPPLEMENTARY

PUBLIC AND PATIENT GUIDE

National Joint Registry for England and Wales 3rd Annual Clinical Report

Appendix E-1 (Figures and Tables) Fig. E-1

Original Date: December 2015 Page 1 of 8 FOR CMS (MEDICARE) MEMBERS ONLY

2016 CELEBRATING 15 YEARS OF DATA REPORT NATIONAL JOINT REPLACEMENT REGISTRY. Outcomes of Classes No Longer Used Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

For Commercial products, please refer to the following policy: Preauthorization via Web-Based Tool for Procedures

PUBLIC AND PATIENT GUIDE TO THE NJR S 11TH ANNUAL REPORT 2014

CLINICAL AND OPERATIVE APPROACH FOR TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT DR.VINMAIE ORTHOPAEDICS PG 2 ND YEAR

Insert dissociation after fixed bearing PS constrained Genesis II total knee arthroplasty. A case series of nine patients

American Joint Replacement Registry. Jeffrey P. Knezovich, CAE Executive Director ---- Caryn D. Etkin, PhD, MPH Director of Analytics

Pre-Op Planning for your knee replacement surgery

Knee Replacement Implants

National Joint Replacement Registry. Lay Summary 2015 Annual Report Hip and Knee Replacement

Biomechanics of. Knee Replacement. Mujda Hakime, Paul Malcolm

CONSENSUS ORTHOPEDICS INC. CONSENSUS KNEE SYSTEM

Knee Osteoarthritis: Is It Time to Think About Surgery?

SEVERE VARUS AND VALGUS DEFORMITIES TREATED BY TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

What to expect from your NAVIO Robotics-assisted Partial Knee Replacement

Functional Outcome following Primary and Revision Total Hip and Knee Replacement

PUBLIC AND PATIENT GUIDE

Unicondylar Knee Vs Total Knee Replacement: Is Less Better In the Middle Aged Athlete

Total Knee Replacement

Unicompartmental Knee Resurfacing

YOUR TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT

Stefan Rahm MD University Hospital Balgrist

itotal Customized POSTERIOR-STABILIZED knee replacement system

Salto Talaris Total Ankle Prosthesis

Commissioning Policy Individual Funding Request

Periarticular knee osteotomy

Patient-specific bicompart mental knee resurfacing system

Knee Replacement Complications

Shoulder Joint Replacement

Saiph Knee System. Technical Dossier

Patellofemoral Replacement

Operations included in the National Joint Registry (NJR) Quick links, go to: Hips > Knees > Ankles > Elbows > Shoulders > Trauma >

Patient Pain and Function Survey

It s your knee. Help keep it that way PERSONALIZED TOTAL KNEE IMPLANTS

Minimally Invasive Hip and Knee Replacement in the Active Patient

WHAT YOU IS BACK WITHIN ARM S REACH

YOU MAY NEED A KNEE REPLACEMENT

CEC ARTICLE: Special Medical Conditions Part 3: Hip and Knee Replacement C. Eggers

2:12-cv VAR-LJM Doc # 1 Filed 08/02/12 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

An Optimum Prosthesis Combination of Low Risk TKR Options in All Five Primary Categories of Design Results in a 60% Reduction in Revision Risk

Important notice: the device(s) can be prescribed and implanted only by a doctor legally authorized to perform this type of surgery.

S1 Shoulder. Primary. MDS VERSION 7.0 Shoulder Operation. Form: MDSv7.0 S1 v1.0. Patient Addressograph

Section of total knee replacement. Total Knee Replacement System. Knieendoprothesen System. Système de prothèse totale de genou

MANAGING KNEE PROBLEMS IN PRIMARY CARE

Partial Knee Replacement

Medical Policy Original Effective Date: Revised Date: 07/26/17 Page 1 of 9

PRE & POST OPERATIVE RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT IN TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT. Dr. Divya Rani K 2 nd Year Resident Dept. of Radiology

Gender Solutions Patello-Femoral Joint System

Are You Living with. Hip Pain? MAKOplasty may be the right treatment option for you.

2016 Report to the Public About. Hip and Knee Replacements

The S.T.A.R. Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement. Patient Information

Total Knee Replacement

Revision surgery for failed unicompartmental knee replacement : Technical aspects and clinical outcome

PARTIAL KNEE REPLACEMENT

Instructions for Use Reprocessed Arthroscopic Shavers

Dr Doron Sher MBBS MBiomedE FRACS(Orth)

Constrained Posterior Stabilized (CPS) Surgical Technique

Clinical Review Report (Sample)

REFERRAL GUIDELINES: ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY

Bilateral total knee arthroplasty: One mobile-bearing and one fixed-bearing

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine (January 2019) Vol. 74 (7), Page

TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY (TKA)

SHOULDER REPLACEMENT PATIENT S GUIDE

Knee Replacement Surgery

Total Knee Original System Primary Surgical Technique

Constrained Posterior Stabilized (CPS)

ConforMIS, Inc. 28 Crosby Drive Bedford, MA Phone: Fax:

Unicompartmental Knee Replacement

INTEROBSERVER CORRELATION IN CLASSIFICATION OF BONE LOSS IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

Ideal Candidate for Cartilage Restoration. Large or Complex Lesions

Bone Bangalore

Aseptic Revision Total Knee Surgical Techniques. Andrew Ehmke, DO Chicago, IL May 5, 2018

Operations included in the National Joint Registry (NJR)

Exam Corner. Hips and Knees. Prepared by Ahmed El-Bakoury, Asif Parkar and Mohamed Sukeik

Open lateral release knee icd- 10

D. The following factors are of extreme importance to the eventual success of the procedure.

Functional Outcome of Uni-Knee Arthroplasty in Asians with six-year Follow-up

High Tibial Osteotomy

THE KNEE SOCIETY VIRTUAL FELLOWSHIP

Knee arthroplasty: What radiologists should know.

why bicompartmental? A REVOLUTIONARY ALTERNATIVE TO TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENTS

Transcription:

PRIMARY Implant ConforMIS Comprising PRIMARY knees implanted up to: 07 December 2017 NJR Database extract: 05 February 2018 Produced on: Licenced for use until: 10 February 2018 10 February 2019 Contents Recorded Usage in NJR Patient and Procedure Details APPENDIX A Component List 2 3 5 13 This report has been produced by Northgate Public Services (UK) Ltd. It summarises usage and outcomes associated with the, based on data collected by the NJR up to the specified date for the components listed in Appendix A. Page 1

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Implant Usage Date of first recorded usage in the NJR: Date of last recorded usage in this dataset: Maximum implantation time: 5.6 Mean implantation time: 1.9 09 November 2011 07 December 2017 years years NJR Recorded Usage Totals Recorded in NJR Procedures Cumulative Total 576 Patients 504 Centres Consultants Implanting Surgeons 46 45 47 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Cumulative Procedures 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Cumulative Surgeons and Centres Procedures Centres Consultants Implanting Surgeons Current Outcome Pre- 2006 Year of implantation 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total % Death 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4 0.7% Revised 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0.5% Unrevised 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 26 76 124 171 157 569 98.8% Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 27 78 125 172 157 576 100% Page 2

Patient / Procedure Details Patient Details itotal G2 XE and itotal G2 (Bicondylar tray) All TKR in NJR Total Procedures 576 958,398 Total Patients 504 786,185 Demographics Mean age 66.6 70.1 < 50 5.0% 1.8% 50 59 16.7% 11.2% 60 69 38.2% 32.4% 70 79 32.5% 38.5% 80 7.6% 16.0% Median BMI 29 30 % BMI information available 78.6% 60.2% Underweight ( BMI < 18.5) 0.2% 0.3% Normal (18.5 BMI < 25) 14.6% 10.2% Overweight (25 BMI < 30) 38.4% 34.2% Obese I (30 BMI < 35) 30.2% 32.3% Obese II (35 BMI < 40) 10.4% 16.2% Obese III (BMI 40) 6.2% 6.9% % Male 51.6% 42.6% ASA Grades P1 - Fit and healthy 21.4% 11.0% P2 - Mild disease not incapacitating 68.1% 72.4% P3 - Incapacitating systemic disease 10.6% 16.2% P4 / P5 0.0% 0.3% Indications Osteoarthritis 98.61% 97.32% Rheumatoid Arthritis 0.52% 1.63% Other Inflammatory Arthropathy 0.52% 0.65% Previous Trauma 0.35% 0.56% Avascular Necrosis 0.17% 0.33% Other 0.52% 0.36% Total of indications may exceed total number of implants, since more than one indication can be listed per case. Page 3

Patient / Procedure Details Intraoperative Adverse Events Event Rate * Adverse Event Number itotal G2 itotal G2 XE and (Bicondylar tray) All other TKR in NJR p value None 575 99.83% 99.41% 0.275 Fracture 0 0.00% 0.16% 1 Patella Tendon Avulsion 1 0.17% 0.04% 0.226 Ligament Injury 0 0.00% 0.07% 1 Other 0 0.00% 0.34% 0.275 multiple events may be listed for one procedure * As percentage of procedures for which adverse event data was recorded Significantly better, p < 0.001 Significantly better, p < 0.05 Significantly worse p < 0.05 Significantly worse p < 0.001 Page 4

PTIR (Revisions per 100 implant Years) Patient - Time Incidence Rate 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Analysis Date PTIR Brand PTIR: 95% Lower Confidence Limit Brand PTIR: 95% Upper Confidence Limit PTIR All TKR in NJR 2 x PTIR All TKR in NJR 1.5 x PTIR All TKR in NJR 100 at risk itotal G2 XE and itotal G2 (Bicondylar tray) PTIR (95% Confidence Interval) 0.280 (0.058-0.817) All TKR in NJR 0.392 Status Not an outlier Outlier level 1: Used in 100 primary operations and PTIR 95% lower confidence > 2 x group PTIR Outlier level 2: Used in 100 primary operations and PTIR 95% lower confidence > 1.5 x group PTIR OR Used in < 100 primary operations and PTIR 95% lower confidence > 2 x group PTIR Page 5

Probability of becoming a persistent long-term outlier Probability of becoming a long term outlier 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Analysis date Level 2+ (>1.5x group) Level 1 (>2x group) Estimated probability of Outlier Level becoming a persistent outlier Level 2+ (>1.5x group PTIR) 4.5% Level 1 (>2x group PTIR) 0.6% The probability of becoming a persistent long-term outlier is estimated from all the NJR evidence to date, and will change as more evidence is accumulated. The probability will approach 0% or 100% in the long term with a large number of implants. The product is likely to be identified by the product outlier process if the probability calculated here exceeds 95%. Page 6

Reasons for Revision Reasons for revision of primary procedures in which the implant was used. Reason for Revision Revised Expected Revisions * p value Infection 1 1.75 1 Progressive Arthritis Remaining 0 0.28 1 Aseptic Loosening Femur 1 0.34 0.288 Aseptic Loosening Tibia 1 0.77 0.537 Aseptic Loosening Patella 1 0.19 0.172 Pain 0 0.96 1 Stiffness 0 0.60 1 Malalignment 0 0.50 1 Instability 2 0.92 0.234 Dislocation / Subluxation 0 0.19 1 Periprosthetic Fracture 0 0.14 1 Wear of Polyethylene Component 1 0.10 0.095 Lysis - Tibia 1 0.16 0.146 Lysis - Femur 1 0.10 0.093 Component Dissociation 0 0.05 1 Implant Fracture 0 0.02 1 Other / Not recorded 0 0.46 1 Total Revised 3 5.80 0.399 multiple reasons may be listed for one revision procedure * Adjusted for agegroup, gender and indications Significantly better, p < 0.001 Significantly better, p < 0.05 Significantly worse p < 0.05 Significantly worse p < 0.001 Components Revised Number of procedures itotal G2 XE and itotal G2 (Bicondylar tray) All other TKR in NJR Femoral and/or Tibial Revision 3 100.0% 71.4% Isolated bearing exchange 0 0.0% 11.9% Patella revision / resurfacing only 0 0.0% 15.6% No component revision recorded 0 0.0% 1.2% Page 7

Revision Details NJR Index No Procedure ID Primary Date Revision Date Years implanted Age at Primary Revision Reasons 1812172 1597990 09/11/2011 18/12/2015 4.11 48 aseptic loosening femur; aseptic loosening patella; aseptic loosening tibia; Instability; LysisFemur; LysisTibia; WearOfPolyethyleneComponent 1892906 1677844 19/03/2014 15/10/2015 1.57 65 Instability 2042935 1825319 11/11/2014 20/12/2014 0.11 74 infection Table contains Most recent 20 revisions Page 8

Revisions Per 100 Component Years Patient - Time Incidence Rate Lead Surgeons implanting 5 4 3 2 1 0 10 100 1,000 10,000 Implant-Years 99.8% Upper limit 95% Upper Limit 95% Lower Limit 99.8% Lower Limit Each circle represents one surgeon. Red circles represent surgeons with a higher than expected revision rate (p <0.001, and blue circles represent surgeons with a lower than expected revision rate (p < 0.001). Note that these rates have not been adjusted for case mix, or for variants of implant chosen. Page 9

Cumulative Revision Rate Cumulative Revision Rate 4.5% 4.0% 3.5% Endpoint: All reasons for revision 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Implantation time / years All other TKR in NJR Cox Proportional Hazards model for revision risk ratio of itotal G2 XE and itotal G2 (Bicondylar tray) / All other TKR in NJR: Adjustment Hazard Ratio (95% CI) p -value 0.58 Unadjusted 0.349 (0.19-1.81) Adjusted for age, gender, year cohort and 0.55 0.305 indications. (0.18-1.71) Page 10

Cumulative Revision Rate Endpoint: All revisions Period /years At Risk itotal G2 XE and itotal G2 (Bicondylar tray) All TKR in NJR 0 576 - - 1 407 0.2% (0.0% - 0.6%) 0.4% (0.4% - 0.4%) 2 234 0.5% (0.1% - 1.3%) 1.0% (1.0% - 1.0%) 3 114 0.5% (0.1% - 1.7%) 1.5% (1.5% - 1.6%) 4 42 0.5% (0.1% - 2.4%) 1.9% (1.9% - 1.9%) 5 ( - ) 2.2% (2.1% - 2.2%) 6 ( - ) 2.4% (2.4% - 2.5%) 7 ( - ) 2.7% (2.6% - 2.7%) 8 ( - ) 2.9% (2.9% - 3.0%) 9 ( - ) 3.2% (3.1% - 3.2%) 10 ( - ) 3.4% (3.3% - 3.4%) Cumulative revision rate with 95% confidence intervals Rate is only reported for times where more than 40 remain at risk Page 11

Disclaimer Disclaimer This report is produced by Northgate Public Services (UK) Limited (NPS) using data collected, collated and provided by third parties. As a result, NPS takes no responsibility for the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of any data used or referred to in this report, and disclaims all warranties in relation to such data, in each case to the maximum extent permitted by legislation. To the maximum extent permitted by law, NPS shall have no liability (including but not limited to liability by reason of negligence) for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of any person using or relying on the data within this report and whether caused by reason of any error, omission or misrepresentation in the report or otherwise. This report is not to be taken as advice. Third parties using or relying on the data in this report do so at their own risk and will be responsible for making their own assessment and should verify all relevant representations, statements and information with their own professional advisers. Page 12

Catalogue Number Description Number Implanted M5725INT0600010 - FI Left KNEE - Femoral Implant 142 M5725INT0600020 - FI Right KNEE - Femoral Implant 171 M5725INT060XE10 - FI LEFT KNEE - Femoral Implant 127 M5725INT060XE20 - FI RIGHT KNEE - Femoral Implant 136 Page 13

Catalogue Number Description Number M5725INT0600010 - TT Left KNEE - Tibial Tray 143 M5725INT0600020 - TT Right KNEE - Tibial Tray 169 M5725INT060XE10 - TT LEFT KNEE - Tibial Tray 127 M5725INT060XE20 - TT RIGHT KNEE - Tibial Tray 137 Page 14

Catalogue Number Description Number M5725INT0600010-6MI Left KNEE - 6mm Medial Insert 27 M5725INT0600010-7MI Left KNEE - 7mm Medial Insert 1 M5725INT0600010-8MI Left KNEE - 8mm Medial Insert 1 M5725INT0600010 - ALI Left KNEE - A Lateral Insert 4 M5725INT0600010 - BLI Left KNEE - B Lateral Insert 1 M5725INT0600020-6MI Right KNEE - 6mm Medial Insert 24 M5725INT0600020-7MI Right KNEE - 7mm Medial Insert 2 M5725INT0600020 - ALI Right KNEE - A Lateral Insert 7 M5725INT060XE10-6MILEFT KNEE - 6mm Medial Insert 5 M5725INT060XE10-8MILEFT KNEE - 8mm Medial Insert 6 M5725INT060XE10 - ALI LEFT KNEE - A Lateral Insert 2 M5725INT060XE10 - BLI LEFT KNEE - B Lateral Insert 1 M5725INT060XE10 - CLI LEFT KNEE - C Lateral Insert 4 M5725INT060XE20-6MIRIGHT KNEE - 6mm Medial Insert 5 M5725INT060XE20-7MIRIGHT KNEE - 7mm Medial Insert 2 M5725INT060XE20-8MIRIGHT KNEE - 8mm Medial Insert 2 M5725INT060XE20 - ALI RIGHT KNEE - A Lateral Insert 4 M5725INT060XE20 - BLI RIGHT KNEE - B Lateral Insert 2 M5725INT060XE20 - CLI RIGHT KNEE - C Lateral Insert 3 Page 15