Supplementary Online Content

Similar documents
Supplementary Online Content

Supplemental Table S2: Subgroup analysis for IL-6 with BMI in 3 groups

Long-term prognostic value of N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) changes within one year in patients with coronary heart disease

Supplementary Online Content

High-sensitivity Troponin T Predicts Recurrent Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Stable Coronary Heart Disease: KAROLA Study 8 Year FU

Know Your Number Aggregate Report Single Analysis Compared to National Averages

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

Troponin Assessment. Does it Carry Clinical Message? Stefan Blankenberg. University Heart Center Hamburg

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

Supplementary Online Content. Abed HS, Wittert GA, Leong DP, et al. Effect of weight reduction and

A: Epidemiology update. Evidence that LDL-C and CRP identify different high-risk groups

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content

Correlation of novel cardiac marker

Supplementary Table 1. Baseline Characteristics by Quintiles of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures

How will new high sensitive troponins affect the criteria?

HIGH SENSITIVITY CARDIAC TROPONIN-T IS ASSOCIATED WITH INCIDENT HYPERTENSION. John W. McEvoy

Know Your Number Aggregate Report Comparison Analysis Between Baseline & Follow-up

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content

Learning Objectives. Predicting and Preventing Cardiovascular Disease. ACC/AHA Cholesterol Guidelines Key differences vs ATP III

Supplementary Online Content

(n=6279). Continuous variables are reported as mean with 95% confidence interval and T1 T2 T3. Number of subjects

Supplementary table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants by paraoxonase-1 (PON-1) gene polymorphisms

Supplementary Online Content

Pitavastatin 4 mg vs. Pravastatin 40 mg in HIV Dyslipidemia: Post- Hoc Analysis of the INTREPID Trial Based on the Independent CHD Risk Factor for Age

Trial to Reduce. Aranesp* Therapy. Cardiovascular Events with

SMARTool clinical and biohumoral results. Chiara Caselli IFC-CNR

Improving Diagnostic, Prognostic & Therapeutic Biomarkers in Heart Disease. Professor Mark Richards Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch

Supplementary Online Content

ARIC Manuscript Proposal # PC Reviewed: 2/10/09 Status: A Priority: 2 SC Reviewed: Status: Priority:

Central pressures and prediction of cardiovascular events in erectile dysfunction patients

Statin therapy in patients with Mild to Moderate Coronary Stenosis by 64-slice Multidetector Coronary Computed Tomography

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

Är dagens troponinmetoder tillräckligt känsliga?

ARIC Manuscript Proposal #2099. PC Reviewed: 3/12/13 Status: A Priority: 2 SC Reviewed: Status: Priority:

2/9/2017. Financial Disclosures/Unapproved Use. Achieving Harmony in Blood Pressure Guidelines Around the Globe. Roger S. Blumenthal, MD.

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content

HFpEF, Mito or Realidad?

Supplementary Online Content

Supplemental table 1. Dietary sources of protein among 2441 men from the Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study MEAT DAIRY OTHER ANIMAL

Supplementary Online Content

Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure (ROSE AHF): A Randomized Clinical Trial

Supplementary Online Content

High Sensitivity Troponin Improves Management. But Not Yet

Supplementary Appendix

The good and bad of exercise

There are many ways to lower triglycerides in humans: Which are the most relevant for pancreatitis and for CV risk?

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content

Cardiologists and HbA1c: Novel Diabetes Drugs and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes

Defining rise and fall of cardiac troponin values

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL. Supplemental Methods. Duke CAD Index

40% minimum reduction from

Serum levels of galectin-1, galectin-3, and galectin-9 are associated with large artery atherosclerotic

pulmonary artery vasoreactivity in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension

Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo

Figure S1. Comparison of fasting plasma lipoprotein levels between males (n=108) and females (n=130). Box plots represent the quartiles distribution

Risk modeling for Breast-Specific outcomes, CVD risk, and overall mortality in Alliance Clinical Trials of Breast Cancer

Natriuretic Peptides The Cardiologists View. Christopher defilippi, MD University of Maryland Baltimore, MD, USA

Supplementary Table 1. Patient demographics and baseline characteristics (treated patients).

CARDIOVASCULAR RISK ASSESSMENT ADDITION OF CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE AND RACE TO THE FRAMINGHAM EQUATION PAUL E. DRAWZ, MD, MHS

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

Mihai Gheorghiade MD

Inflammation and and Heart Heart Disease in Women Inflammation and Heart Disease

Biomarkers in Heart Disease. Felix J. Rogers, DO, FACOI April 29, 2018

Copeptin in heart failure: Associations with clinical characteristics and prognosis

Supplementary Online Content

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

Supplementary Online Content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 60 hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation and warfarin use

Evidence of Baroreflex Activation Therapy s Mechanism of Action

Oscar L. Lopez, M.D. Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry Alzheimer s Disease Research Center University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

Subclinical atherosclerosis in CVD: Risk stratification & management Raul Santos, MD

ST2 in Heart Failure. ST2 as a Cardiovascular Biomarker. Competitive Model of ST2/IL-33 Signaling. ST2 and IL-33: Cardioprotective

ESCBM meeting 2018, Prague Utility of Cardiac Biomarkers in Clinical Heart Failure Care. Md. Shahidul Islam, M.D., Ph.D

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Treatment Of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone antagonist (TOPCAT) AHA Nov 18, 2014 Update on Randomized Trials

BioRemarkable Symposium

The Framingham Risk Score (FRS) is widely recommended

Overweight and Obesity in Older Persons: Impact Upon Health and Mortality Outcomes

Supplementary Online Content

2013 Hypertension Measure Group Patient Visit Form

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Nothing to disclose

2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA HF guidelines. Advances in the Use of Biomarkers in Heart Failure Patients. Outline

Antihypertensive Trial Design ALLHAT

Protecting the heart and kidney: implications from the SHARP trial

CVD Risk Assessment. Michal Vrablík Charles University, Prague Czech Republic

Supplementary Online Content

SGK 2016 Session: Postgraduate Course in Heart Failure Lausanne, 15. June 2016 Heart Failure Guidelines 2016

Online Appendix (JACC )

Transcription:

Supplementary Online Content McEvoy JW, Chen Y, Ndumele CE, et al. Six-year change in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and risk of subsequent coronary heart disease, heart failure, and death. JAMA Cardiol. Published online June 8, 2016. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0765. etable 1. Study Population for the Primary Analysis Evaluating the Association of hs-ctnt Change Between ARIC Visit 2 and Visit 4 With subsequent CHD, HF, or Death Occurring After Visit 4 etable 2. Crude Incidence Rates (per 1000 Person-years) and Adjusted* Hazard Ratios (95% CIs) for Incident Coronary Heart Disease, Heart Failure Hospitalization, or Death According To Sex-Specific Categories of 6-Year Change in High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T (hs-ctnt) (N=8838) etable 3. Adjusted* Hazard Ratios (95% CIs) for Incident Coronary Heart Disease, Heart Failure, or Death According to Categories of 6-Year Change in High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T (hs-ctnt) With and Without Further Adjustment for Either Change in NT-proBNP or Visit 4 hs-ctnt etable 4. Crude Incidence Rates (per 1000 Person-years) and Adjusted* Hazard Ratios (95% CIs) for Incident Coronary Heart Disease, Heart Failure Hospitalization, or Death According to 25% Relative Change of 6-Year Change in hs-ctnt etable 5. Net Reclassification Improvement for Coronary Heart Disease, Heart Failure and Death With the Addition of the First and Second hs-ctnt Values to a Traditional Risk Factor Prediction Model etable 6. Adjusted* Hazard Ratios (95% CIs) for Heart Failure Subtypes (HFrEF and HFpEF) Adjudicated After 2005 According to Categories of 6-Year Change in High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T (hs-ctnt): Full Model With and Without Further Adjustment for 6-Year Change in NT-proBNP efigure 1. Cumulative Survival Free of Coronary Heart Disease, Heart Failure Hospitalization, or Death Stratified by Categories of Change in High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T (hs-ctnt) During 6 Years (Incident Detectable, Incident Elevated, or Percent Relative Change*) efigure 2. Restricted Cubic Splines for Adjusted* Hazard Ratios (95% CIs) of Incident Coronary Heart Disease (CHD), Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization, or Death According to Absolute 6-Year Change in High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T (hs-ctnt) (per Unit Increase in ng/l) efigure 3. Restricted Cubic Splines for Adjusted* Hazard Ratios (95% CIs) of (a) Incident Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) (B) Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization, or (C) Death According to Absolute 6-Year Change in High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T (hs-ctnt) (per Unit Increase in ng/l) and Stratified by Visit 2 Concentration Groups (<5 ng/l, 5-13 ng/l, and 14 ng/l) efigure 4. Restricted Cubic Splines for Adjusted* Hazard Ratios (95% CIs) of Incident HFrEF or HFpEF according to Absolute 6-Year Change in High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T (hs-ctnt) (per Unit Increase in ng/l) This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work.

etable 1. Study Population for the Primary Analysis Evaluating the Association of hs-ctnt Change Between ARIC Visit 2 and Visit 4 With subsequent CHD, HF, or Death Occurring After Visit 4 Exclusion Process Exclusion Population Participates at visit 4 11656 Prevalent CHD and HF at or prior to visit 4 1308 10348 Missing model covariates at visit 4 576 9772 Missing hs-ctnt data at either visit 2 or visit 4 748 9024 Missing follow-up information for events after visit 4 123 8901 Non black or white, race-center exclusion 63 8838 Study population 8838

etable 2. Crude Incidence Rates (per 1000 Person-years) and Adjusted* Hazard Ratios (95% CIs) for Incident Coronary Heart Disease, Heart Failure Hospitalization, or Death According To Sex-Specific Categories of 6-Year Change in High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T (hs-ctnt) (N=8838) Outcomes Absolute hs-ctnt change according to Gender MEN Incident Elevated (Baseline <24ng/L, Follow-up 24ng/L) WOMEN Incident Elevated (Baseline <14ng/L, Follow-up 14ng/L) No (N=3500) Yes (N=83) No (N=5040) Yes (N=108) Heart Failure n=367 n=31 n=489 n=41 Incidence Rate 8.3 (7.5-9.2) 40.1 (28.2-57.0) 7.4 (6.8-8.1) 39.3 (29.0-53.4) Demographic Model* 4.11 4.28 (2.83-5.96) (3.10-5.90) 2.60 2.56 (1.77-3.82) (1.81-3.63) Coronary Heart Disease n=652 n=29 n=416 n=23 Incidence Rate 15.9(14.7-17.2) 39.4 (27.4-56.7) 6.3 (5.7-7.0) 20.8 (13.8-31.3) Demographic Model* 2.32 2.77 (1.59-3.37) (1.81-4.24) 1.71 2.08 (1.16-2.51) (1.33-3.25) Death n=870 n=45 n=791 n=53 Incidence Rate 19.2(18.0-20.6) 52.4 (39.1-70.2) 11.6 (10.8-12.4) 43.9 (33.5-57.5) Demographic Model* 2.32 3.08 (1.72-3.14) (2.33-4.08) 1.93 2.26 (1.42-2.62) (1.68-3.05) * Demographic Model- Adjusted for age, race-center; Full Model- Adjusted for age,, race-center, body mass index (kg/m3), C-reactive protein (mg/l), smoking (current; former; never), drinking (current; former; never), systolic blood pressure (mmhg), current use of blood pressure-lowering medication (yes or no), diagnosed diabetes (yes or no), LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl), HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl), triglycerides (mg/dl), and current use of cholesterollowering medication (yes or no), estimated GFR (ml/min/1.73m2), and left ventricular hypertrophy (yes or no, by Cornell criteria).

etable 3. Adjusted* Hazard Ratios (95% CIs) for Incident Coronary Heart Disease, Heart Failure, or Death According to Categories of 6-Year Change in High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T (hs-ctnt) With and Without Further Adjustment for Either Change in NT-proBNP or Visit 4 hs-ctnt Outcomes Absolute hs-ctnt change among all participants Incident Detectable (Baseline <5ng/L, Follow-up 5ng/L) No (N=3888) Yes (N=2152) Incident Elevated (Baseline <14ng/L, Follow-up 14ng/L) No (N=8155) Relative change among persons with measurable hs-ctnt values >50% Decrease Change 50% >50% Increase Yes (N=443) (N=74) (N=2227) (N=1147) Heart Failure n=235 n=260 n=761 n=134 n=10 n=309 n=234 Additional adjustments Coronary Heart Disease Additional adjustments 1.96 (1.62-2.37) 1.86 (1.53-2.25) 2.78 (2.27-3.40) 2.54 (2.07-3.13) 0.49 (0.23-1.01) 0.94 (0.49-1.77) 1.60 (1.35-1.91) 1.34 (1.12-1.60) n=330 n=301 n=969 n=119 n=9 n=374 n=239 1.38 (1.16-1.63) 1.37 (1.16-1.63) 1.75 (1.43-2.15) 1.68 (1.36-2.06) 0.47 (0.22-1.03) 0.79 (0.41-1.53) 1.28 (1.09-1.52) 1.14 (0.96-1.35) Death n=508 n=486 n=1496 n=209 n=17 n=584 n=392 Additional adjustments 1.50 (1.31-1.72) 1.46 (1.28-2.10 (1.80-2.46) 1.97 (1.69-2.31) 0.57 (0.33-0.99) 0.89 (0.55-1.39 (1.22-1.59) 1.23 (1.08-1.41) 1.68) 1.46) * Full Model- Adjusted for age, sex, race-center, body mass index (kg/m3), C-reactive protein (mg/l), smoking (current; former; never), drinking (current; former; never), systolic blood pressure (mmhg), current use of blood pressure-lowering medication (yes or no), diagnosed diabetes (yes or no), LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl), HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl), triglycerides (mg/dl), and current use of cholesterol-lowering medication (yes or no), estimated GFR (ml/min/1.73m2), and left ventricular hypertrophy (yes or no, by Cornell criteria). Sample (N=3448) includes only those who have measurable hs-ctnt values ( 3 ng/l) at both visits. Relative change is calculated as a percent of baseline hs-ctnt. The full model for this relative change exposure is further adjusted for visit 2 hsctnt. Additional adjustment is for 1) continuous absolute change in NT-proBNP (in pg/ml) between visits 2 and 4 for the incident detectable and incident elevated models and 2) both adjusting for absolute change in NT-proBNP and for visit 4 hs-ctnt instead of visit 2 hs-ctnt for the relative change model.

etable 4. Crude Incidence Rates (per 1000 Person-years) and Adjusted* Hazard Ratios (95% CIs) for Incident Coronary Heart Disease, Heart Failure Hospitalization, or Death According to 25% Relative Change of 6-Year Change in hs-ctnt Outcomes Relative change among persons with measurable hs-ctnt values >25% Decrease Change 25% >25% Increase (N=414) (N=1377) (N=1657) Heart Failure n=50 n=185 n=318 Incidence Rate 9.5 10.7 16.5 Demographic Model* 0.88 (0.65-1.21) 1.53 (1.28-1.84) 0.83 (0.60-1.16) 1.54 (1.28-1.86) Coronary Heart Disease n=69 n=226 n=327 Incidence Rate 13.7 13.5 17.6 Demographic Model* 1.07 (0.81-1.40) 1.24 (1.05-1.47) 1.04 (0.78-1.39) 1.21 (1.02-1.44) Death n=96 n=357 n=540 Incidence Rate 17.6 19.8 26.4 Demographic Model* 0.93 (0.74-1.17) 1.29 (1.13-1.47) 0.86 (0.68-1.09) 1.29 (1.13-1.48) * Demographic Model- Adjusted for age, sex, race-center; Full Model- Adjusted for age, sex, race-center, body mass index (kg/m3), C-reactive protein (mg/l), smoking (current; former; never), drinking (current; former; never), systolic blood pressure (mmhg), current use of blood pressure-lowering medication (yes or no), diagnosed diabetes (yes or no), LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl), HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl), triglycerides (mg/dl), and current use of cholesterol-lowering medication (yes or no), estimated GFR (ml/min/1.73m2), left ventricular hypertrophy (yes or no, by Cornell criteria) and visit 2 hs-ctnt. Relative change sample (N=3448) only includes those who have measurable hs-ctnt values ( 3 ng/l) at both visits. Relative change is calculated as a percent of baseline hs-ctnt.

etable 5. Net Reclassification Improvement for Coronary Heart Disease, Heart Failure and Death With the Addition of the First and Second hs-ctnt Values to a Traditional Risk Factor Prediction Model Continuous NRI Coronary heart disease Heart failure All-cause mortality Model Overall NRI p value Overall NRI p value Overall NRI p value Model 1 (vs. base model*) -2% 0.538-7% 0.077 +4% 0.245 Model 2 (vs. model 1) +7% 0.050 +16% 0.006 +11% 0.001 *Base model is adjusted for age, sex, race-center, smoking (current; former; never), systolic blood pressure (mmhg), current use of blood pressure-lowering medication (yes or no), diagnosed diabetes (yes or no), LDLcholesterol (mg/dl), HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) *Model 1 is base model + v4 hs-ctnt. *Model 2 is base model + v4 hs-ctnt +v2 hs-ctnt.

etable 6. Adjusted* Hazard Ratios (95% CIs) for Heart Failure Subtypes (HFrEF and HFpEF) Adjudicated After 2005 According to Categories of 6-Year Change in High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T (hs-ctnt): Full Model With and Without Further Adjustment for 6-Year Change in NT-proBNP Heart Failure Subtypes Absolute hs-ctnt change among all participants Incident Detectable (Baseline <5ng/L, Follow-up 5ng/L) No (n=3599) Yes (n=1867) Incident Elevated (Baseline <14ng/L, Follow-up 14ng/L) No (n=7306) Relative change among persons with measurable hs-ctnt values >50% Decrease Change 50% >50% Increase Yes (n=286) (n=71) (n=2038) (n=996) HFrEF n=88 n=72 n=256 n=30 n=5 n=121 n=77 Additional adjustment for 6-year change in NT-proBNP 1.54 (1.10-2.16) 1.43 (1.02-2.02) 2.43 (1.62-3.65) 2.31 (1.54-3.47) 0.85 (0.31-2.31) 0.87 (0.32-2.38) 1.26 (0.94-1.69) 1.24 (0.93-1.66) HFpEF n=69 n=67 n=199 n=17 n=3 n=76 n=46 Additional adjustment for 6-year change in NT-proBNP 1.72 (1.20-2.47) 1.68 (1.17-2.41) 1.80 (1.06-3.05) 1.70 (1.01-2.89) 1.06 (0.32-3.51) 1.10 (0.33-3.65) 1.16 (0.80-1.69) 1.09 (0.74-1.59) * Demographic Model- Adjusted for age, sex, race-center; Full Model- Adjusted for age, sex, race-center, body mass index (kg/m3), C-reactive protein (mg/l), smoking (current; former; never), drinking (current; former; never), systolic blood pressure (mmhg), current use of blood pressure-lowering medication (yes or no), diagnosed diabetes (yes or no), LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl), HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl), triglycerides (mg/dl), and current use of cholesterol-lowering medication (yes or no), estimated GFR (ml/min/1.73m2), and left ventricular hypertrophy (yes or no, by Cornell criteria). Sample (N=3448) only includes those who have measurable hs-ctnt values ( 3 ng/l) at both visits. Relative change is calculated as a percent of baseline hs-ctnt. The full model for this exposure is further adjusted for visit 2 hs-ctnt.

efigure 1. Cumulative Survival Free of Coronary Heart Disease, Heart Failure Hospitalization, or Death Stratified by Categories of Change in High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T (hs-ctnt) During 6 Years (Incident Detectable, Incident Elevated, or Percent Relative Change*)

*Incident Detectable=Baseline <5ng/L, Follow-up 5ng/L; Incident Elevated=Baseline <14ng/L, Follow-up 14ng/L. Percent relative change sample (N=3448) only includes those who have measurable hs-ctnt values ( 3 ng/l) at both visits. Relative change is calculated as a percent of baseline hs-ctnt

efigure 2. Restricted Cubic Splines for Adjusted* Hazard Ratios (95% CIs) of Incident Coronary Heart Disease (CHD), Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization, or Death According to Absolute 6-Year Change in High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T (hs-ctnt) (per Unit Increase in ng/l) *Adjusted for age, sex, race-center, body mass index (kg/m3), C-reactive protein (mg/l), smoking (current; former; never), drinking (current; former; never), systolic blood pressure (mmhg), current use of blood pressure-lowering medication (yes or no), diagnosed diabetes (yes or no), LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl), HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl), triglycerides (mg/dl), and current use of cholesterol-lowering medication (yes or no), estimated GFR (ml/min/1.73m2), left ventricular hypertrophy (yes or no, by Cornell criteria), and visit 2 hs-ctnt (ng/l). Sample (N=3448) only includes those who have measurable hs-ctnt values ( 3 ng/l) at both visits. Background histogram displays the frequency distribution of hs-ctnt change in the sample. Splines are centered at the median of hs-ctnt change and are truncated at the 1 st and 99 th percentile.

efigure 3. Restricted Cubic Splines for Adjusted* Hazard Ratios (95% CIs) of (a) Incident Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) (B) Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization, or (C) Death According to Absolute 6-Year Change in High- Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T (hs-ctnt) (per Unit Increase in ng/l) and Stratified by Visit 2 Concentration Groups (<5 ng/l, 5-13 ng/l, and 14 ng/l) A- CHD

B- Heart Failure

C- Death (All-cause Mortality) *Adjusted for age, sex, race-center, body mass index (kg/m3), C-reactive protein (mg/l), smoking (current; former; never), drinking (current; former; never), systolic blood pressure (mmhg), current use of blood pressure-lowering medication (yes or no), diagnosed diabetes (yes or no), LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl), HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl), triglycerides (mg/dl), and current use of cholesterol-lowering medication (yes or no), estimated GFR (ml/min/1.73m2), and left ventricular hypertrophy (yes or no, by Cornell criteria). Sample (N=3448) only includes those who have measurable hs-ctnt values ( 3 ng/l) at both visits. Background histogram displays the frequency distribution of hs-ctnt change in the sample. Splines are centered at the median of hs-ctnt change and are truncated at the 1 st and 99 th percentile.

efigure 4. Restricted Cubic Splines for Adjusted* Hazard Ratios (95% CIs) of Incident HFrEF or HFpEF according to Absolute 6-Year Change in High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T (hs-ctnt) (per Unit Increase in ng/l) - HFREF - HFPEF *Adjusted for age, sex, race-center, body mass index (kg/m3), C-reactive protein (mg/l), smoking (current; former; never), drinking (current; former; never), systolic blood pressure (mmhg), current use of blood pressure-lowering medication (yes or no), diagnosed diabetes (yes or no), LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl), HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl), triglycerides (mg/dl), and current use of cholesterol-lowering medication (yes or no), estimated GFR (ml/min/1.73m2), left ventricular hypertrophy (yes or no, by Cornell criteria), and visit 2 hs-ctnt (ng/l). Sample (N=3448) only includes those who have measurable hs-ctnt values ( 3 ng/l) at both visits. Background histogram displays the frequency distribution of hs-ctnt change in the sample. Splines are centered at the median of hs-ctnt change and are truncated at the 1 st and 99 th percentile.