Introduction to Cost- Effectiveness Analysis. Brennan Spiegel, MD, MSHS

Similar documents
Performing a cost-effectiveness analysis: surveillance of patients with ulcerative colitis Provenzale D, Wong J B, Onken J E, Lipscomb J

Health Economics 101: PPI prescriptions in the Emergency Room

Cost-effectiveness of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements for prophylaxis of variceal re-bleeding Raines D L, Dupont A W, Arguedas M R

Setting The setting was the community. The economic study was carried out in the USA.

Supplementary Online Content

Economic Evaluation. Introduction to Economic Evaluation

Session 6. Evaluating the Cost of Pharmaceuticals

A cost-utility analysis of treatment options for inguinal hernia in 1,513,008 adult patients Stylopoulos N, Gazelle G S, Rattner D W

Helicobacter pylori-associated ulcer bleeding: should we test for eradication after treatment Pohl H, Finlayson S R, Sonnenberg A, Robertson D J

Economic Analyses in Clinical Trials

Health technology The study compared three strategies for diagnosing and treating obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS).

Faecal DNA testing compared with conventional colorectal cancer screening methods: a decision analysis Song K, Fendrick A M, Ladabaum U

Health Services Research and Health Economics. Paul McCrone Institute of Psychiatry, King s College London

Setting The setting was primary care. The economic study was carried out in Canada.

Folland et al Chapter 4

A cost effectiveness analysis of treatment options for methotrexate-naive rheumatoid arthritis Choi H K, Seeger J D, Kuntz K M

Source of effectiveness data The effectiveness data were derived from a review of completed studies and authors' assumptions.

One-third of adults experience pain or discomfort in

Esophageal submucosal mass icd 10

Clopidogrel versus aspirin for secondary prophylaxis of vascular events: a cost-effectiveness analysis Schleinitz M D, Weiss J P, Owens D K

Gastroenterology Fellowship Program

Basic Economic Analysis. David Epstein, Centre for Health Economics, York

Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer Sonnenberg A, Delco F, Inadomi J M

UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY. Cost-effectiveness of chest x-ray screening for diagnosis and treatment of inactive. Dina Avalee Fisher A THESIS

Setting The setting was secondary care. The economic study was carried out in Hong Kong, China.

New Therapies for HCV, What About the Cost? Benjamin P. Linas, MD,MPH June 16, 2014

Setting The setting was secondary care. The economic study was conducted in the USA.

Cost-Utility Analysis (CUA), part II

Economic effects of beta-blocker therapy in patients with heart failure Cowper P A, DeLong E R, Whellan D J, LaPointe N M, Califf R M

Reporting and Interpreting Results of Economic Evaluation

Cost-effectiveness of uterine artery embolization and hysterectomy for uterine fibroids Beinfeld M T, Bosch J L, Isaacson K B, Gazelle G S

Assessment of cost-effectiveness of universal hepatitis B immunization in a low-income country with intermediate endemicity using a Markov model

Cost-effectiveness of different strategies of cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in orthotopic liver transplant recipients Das A

Cost-effectiveness of measuring fractional flow reserve to guide coronary interventions Fearon W F, Yeung A C, Lee D P, Yock P G, Heidenreich P A

Economics of Incontinence

Source of effectiveness data The effectiveness data were derived from a review or synthesis of completed studies.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of biological treatments for rheumatoid arthritis Chiou C F, Choi J, Reyes C M

Lahey Clinic Internal Medicine Residency Program: Curriculum for Gastroenterology

Best Practices for Specialty Pharmacy Usage Management. Neil S. Shah, PharmD Specialty Pharmacist, Blue Cross Blue Shield of NC

Pharmacoeconomics: from Policy to Science. Olivia Wu, PhD Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment

Setting The setting was community. The economic study was carried out in the USA.

Genomic Health, Inc. Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay Clinical Compendium March 30, 2012

Using CEA to inform state policy 30 November 2017

Quantitative benefit-risk assessment: An analytical framework for a shared understanding of the effects of medicines. Patrick Ryan 21 April 2010

Cost-effectiveness of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair Michaels J A, Drury D, Thomas S M

Type of intervention Secondary prevention and treatment; Other (medication coverage policy design).

Cost-effectiveness Analysis for HHS

Setting The setting was secondary care. The economic study was carried out in the UK.

Health technology Serological testing and endoscopy with biopsy for suspected peptic ulcer disease.

Cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation Chan P S, Vijan S, Morady F, Oral H

What does it mean for innovative technologies/medicines? Health economic evaluations and their role in health care decision making.

6/25/ % 20% 50% 19% Functional Dyspepsia Peptic Ulcer GERD Cancer Other

Study population The study population comprised a hypothetical cohort of patients with confirmed reflux oesophagitis.

ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Patients with Ulcer Bleeding

Physician specialty and the outcomes and cost of admissions for end-stage liver disease Ko C W, Kelley K, Meyer K E

Cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination in high-risk children in Argentina Dayan G H, Nguyen V H, Debbag R, Gomez R, Wood S C

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of thrombolysis in submassive pulmonary embolism Perlroth D J, Sanders G D, Gould M K

Esophageal Varices Beta-Blockers or Band Ligation. Cesar Yaghi MD Hotel-Dieu de France University Hospital Universite Saint Joseph

Bleeding in the Digestive Tract

The PPI Doesn t Work, Now What? PPI Non-responsive Dyspepsia. Disclosures

Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for celiac disease in the adult population Shamir R, Hernell O, Leshno M

QALYs and the QALY problem in PC. 1. Idea of the QALY 2. QALY problem in Palliative Care

A Primer on Health Economics & Integrating Findings from Clinical Trials into Health Technology Assessments and Decision Making

Is proton beam therapy cost effective in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate? Konski A, Speier W, Hanlon A, Beck J R, Pollack A

Economic Evaluations of Medical Care Interventions for Cancer Patients: How, Why, and What Does it Mean?

What is an Upper GI Endoscopy?

Top 10 Things you need to know about IBD. Suresh Pola, MD Kaiser San Diego

Setting The setting was primary care. The economic study was carried out in the USA.

Cost-Utility Analysis (CUA) Explained

A. Introduction to Health Economics. Dr Alan Haycox Reader in Health Economics Health Economics Unit University of Liverpool Management School

2/20/2012. New Technology #1. The Horizon of New Health Technologies. Introduction to Economic Evaluation

Introduction to Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

An Introduction to Costeffectiveness

Linezolid for treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a cost-effective alternative to vancomycin Shorr A F, Susla G M, Kollef M H

Decision Analysis. John M. Inadomi. Decision trees. Background. Key points Decision analysis is used to compare competing

Cost-utility of initial medical management for Crohn's disease perianal fistulae Arseneau K O, Cohn S M, Cominelli F, Connors A F

Radiotherapy is a cost-effective palliative treatment for patients with bone metastasis from prostate cancer Konski A

Study population The study population comprised a hypothetical cohort of 50-year-olds at average risk of CRC.

Health technology The use of oseltamivir for the treatment of influenza in otherwise healthy children.

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SCOPE

Setting The setting was primary care. The economic study was carried out in Brazil, France, Germany and Italy.

Setting The setting was community. The economic study was carried out in the USA.

Food for thought. Department of Health Services Research 1

Cost-effectiveness analysis of immunochemical occult blood screening for colorectal cancer among three fecal sampling methods Yamamoto M, Nakama H

STUDY. Cost-effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Using Methotrexate vs Goeckerman Therapy for Psoriasis

Cost effectiveness of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir (Harvoni ) in combination with other medicinal products for the treatment of hepatitis C infection

Cost effectiveness of early treatment with oral aciclovir in adult chickenpox Smith K J, Roberts M S

Review and consensus of cost effectiveness methods

Testing for Celiac Sprue in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Predominant Diarrhea: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

INSTRUCTOR S NOTE. Copyright 2018, The Johns Hopkins University and Teaching Vaccine Economics Everywhere.

Treatment options for diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis Kantor J, Margolis D J

National Digestive Diseases Information Clearinghouse

Generalised cost-effectiveness analysis for breast cancer prevention and care in Hong Kong Chinese. Wong, IOL; Tsang, JWH; Cowling, BJ; Leung, GM

Dr David Rowbotham. The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust NHS

EGD Data Collection Form

Cirrhosis Patient Teaching Information

Patient History Form

Is noncontact normothermic wound therapy cost effective for the treatment of stages 3 and 4 pressure ulcers Macario A, Dexter F

Screening for malignant melanoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis Freedberg K A, Geller A C, Miller D R, Lew R A, Koh H K

Transcription:

Introduction to Cost- Effectiveness Analysis Brennan Spiegel, MD, MSHS VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA CURE Digestive Diseases Research Center UCLA/VA Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CORE) Objectives Define types of health-economic models Introduce decision analysis Introduce utilities and QALYs Review solution to competing choice problem Examine role of sensitivity analysis Discuss shortcomings of cost-effectiveness analysis Introduce budget impact models as alternative 1

Taxonomy of Health-Economic Analyses Decision Analysis Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Cost-Minimization Analysis (CMA) Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) Cost-Utility Analysis (CUA) Budget Impact Model (BIM) Health Economic Models Type of Model Numerator Denominator Example CEA CUA $ $ Health Outcome QALY Cost per ulcer bleed prevented Cost per QALY CBA $ $ Cost per willingness-to-pay (WTP) for IBS symptom relief CMA BIM $ $ None None Overall cost of using cox-2 inhibitor instead of ibuprofen Per member per month (PMPM) cost of screening for varices in cirrhosis 2

Example Questions Is it cost-effective to screen for esophageal varices in cirrhosis? What is the cost-utility of of using cox-2 inhibitors instead of non-selective NSAIDs in arthritis? How sensitive and specific must a hypothetical pancreatic cancer tumor marker be in order for it to be cost-effective? What is the incremental PMPM cost of using rifaximin instead of lactulose for hepatic encephalopathy? Guiding Principles of Health Economics Resources are limited If you spend money in one place, then you can t spend it in another Aim to provide the most good to most people Litmus test: Is the juice worth the squeeze Dying younger is cheaper Rule of rescue can throw off a perfectly rationale argument Computers are amoral. Humans are not. 3

When Does Money Matter? When budgets are tight (e.g. always!) When competing strategies are equally effective (principle of CMA) When one strategy is significantly more effective than another, but also more expensive When people live a long time with a condition When a condition is highly prevalent Ways to Save Money Don t do things that are ineffective & expensive Skip low yield steps or cut corners Use lower cost stuff, even if it s less effective Use lower cost people, even if it s less effective Downgrade to a less expensive settings Do nothing at all 4

Decision Analysis Example: Irritable Bowel Syndrome 45 yo with irritable bowel syndrome Symptoms severe Co-morbid depression Which therapy to start with? Usual Care Paroxetine 5

Suppose there are two factors that drive the decision Will the symptoms improve? Will there be side-effects? Decision Node Which therapy? Feels Better Does not Feel Better Chance Nodes Feels Better Does not Feel Better No No No No 6

Software Depiction 7

Defining the Outcomes No Occur Symptoms Improve Symptoms Persist Which therapy? Feels Better 0.40 Does not Feel Better 0.60 Feels Better 0.53 Does not Feel Better 0.47 0.15 No 0.85 0.15 No 0.85 0.10 No 0.90 0.10 No 0.90 8

Defining the Outcome: Utilities 0 1 Death 0.62 0.87 Perfect Health Direct Rating Scale 0 1 Death Perfect Health 9

Indirect Rating: Time Trade-Off 39 years Present 40 years Indirect Rating: Time Trade-Off 38 years Present 40 years 10

Indirect Rating: Time Trade-Off 37 years Present 40 years Indirect Rating: Time Trade-Off 36 years Present 40 years 11

Indirect Rating: Time Trade-Off 35 years Present 40 years Calculating the Time Trade-Off Utility Utility = time willing to spend in perfect health total remaining lifespan Utility = 35 years 40 years = 0.87 12

Other Utility Elicitation Techniques Standard gamble Multi-attribute scales (EuroQol, HUI) SF-36 conversions Conjoint analysis Quality-Adjusted Life-Years QALY is a year of life, adjusted for the quality in which it is lived One year lived with utility of 0.87 = 87% of year lived in perfect health 87% of year lived in perfect health = 0.87 QALY 13

Quality-Adjusted Life-Years 1 Utility 5 QALYs 0 1 2 3 4 5 Year Quality-Adjusted Life-Years 1 Treatment A Treatment B Discontinue B HRQOL 0 3.2 QALYs 1 2 3 4 5 Year 14

Which therapy? Feels Better 0.40 Does not Feel Better 0.60 Feels Better 0.53 Does not Feel Better 0.47 0.15 No 0.85 0.15 No 0.85 0.10 No 0.90 0.10 No 0.90 Which therapy? Feels Better 0.40 Does not Feel Better 0.60 Feels Better 0.53 Does not Feel Better 0.47 0.15 No 0.85 0.15 No 0.85 0.10 No 0.90 0.10 No 0.90.87 1.0.63.87.87 1.0.63.87 15

Rolling Back the Tree Calculate the expected value of each arm Does not Feel Better 0.15.63 Which therapy? 0.60.60 x.15 x.63 =.0567 Which therapy? Feels Better 0.40 Does not Feel Better 0.60 Feels Better 0.53 Does not Feel Better 0.47 0.15 No 0.85 0.15 No 0.85 0.10 No 0.90 0.10 No 0.90.0522.34.0567.51.046.48.03.423 16

Summing the Arms.0522 +.34 +.0567 +.51.046 +.48 +.03+.423 Summing the Arms.95 <.98 17

Question SSRI provides 0.03 more QALY vs. usual care. That s 10.95 additional quality adjusted days per year. So, is the juice worth the squeeze? Juice = QALYs Squeeze = $ Costs Cost estimates depends upon perspective Third party payer perspective Medicare reimbursement Average wholesale drug prices Patient perspective Days lost from work Transportation costs for doctor visits Societal perspective Includes all up-front, induced, and averted costs 18

Sequence of Costs Initial: Costs initially incurred upon initiation of a strategy Induced: Costs resulting from an intervention Transition: Costs associated with transitioning between health states Averted: Costs associated with events avoided by intervention Terminal: Costs of death Some Issues with Costs Cost vs. charges Comprehensiveness of resources included in the model Discounting future costs Updating old costs using medical services component of CPI Problems with AWP 19

Example Cost Estimates GI Resource Cost Cost per tablet of SSRI $3.00 Cost per day of Metamucil $0.50 GI office visit $52 Colonoscopy $624 Upper endoscopy $624 Flexible sigmoidoscopy $125 ERCP $1213 Abdominal XR / Upper GI Series / BE $541 Abdominal ultrasound $541 Elective abdominal surgery $13,531 Obtaining Cost Estimates Outpatient services AMA CPT codes and costs (http://www.ama-assn.org/) Inpatient services DRG codes and costs (http://www.ahrq.gov/data/hcup/) 20

Cost-Effectiveness $850 / year $1350 / year Cost-Effectiveness $850.95 $1350.98 21

Cost-Effectiveness $895/QALY $1378/QALY Cost-Utility Results Cost ($) 1600 1400 1200 1000 800.90.92.94.96.98 1.0 Effectiveness (QALYs) Usual Care Paroxetine $ 16,100 / QALY Most C/E 22

Incremental Cost Effectiveness ICER = Δ Cost Δ Effect Another Example Cost ($) 3000 2400 1800 1200 600 Coxib Naproxen $275,000.965.97.975.98.985.99 Effectiveness (QALYs) Most C/E Spiegel et al. Ann Int Med 2004 23

Question How do you know if $275,000 per QALY is too much? Anyone who tells you there is an easy answer to this is mistaken! Question Why are we using QALYs, anyway? 24

League Table COST DESCRIPTION PPI Test in acid reflux Screening for Barrett s esophagus Screening for celiac sprue in IBS Angioplasty in acute MI CMV prophylaxis in AIDS Screening for varices in cirrhosis Celebrex for chronic arthritis Intravenous PPI therapy for ulcer bleed $ / OUTCOME $10,160 $10,440 $11,000 $13,100 $22,000 $175,833 $275,000 $708,735 PPI Test: Ofman et al. APT 2002 Barrett s: Inadomi et al. Ann Int Med 2003 Sprue: Spiegel et al. Gastroenterol 2004 Angioplasty: Lieu et al. JACC 1997 CVM: Moore et al. J AIDS Hum Retro 1997 Varices: Spiegel et al. Hepatology 2004 Celebrex: Spiegel et al. Ann Int Med 2004 IV PPI: Spiegel et al. Clin Gastro Hep 2006 Another Example Cost ($) 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 Dominated.90.92.94.96.98 1.0 Effectiveness (QALYs) Strategy A Strategy B Strategy C Strategy D Dominant 25

Another Competing Choice Example 2000 1875 Cost ($) 1750 1625 1500.90.92.94.96.98 1.0 Effectiveness (QALYs) Most effective, but no bargain Diminishing Doing Nothing is Usually Return Cheap Curve is Steep Elbow of curve is sweet spot closest to RLQ 26

Handling Uncertainty Precise probability estimates may not be valid Cost estimates may vary between different settings Solution: Sensitivity Analysis One-Way Sensitivity Analysis: Cost of Paroxetine Cost / Effectiveness 1300 1100 900 700 500 $2.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cost of Paroxetine ($) Usual Care Paroxetine 27

Another Example 45K ASA alone ASA+PPI Clop alone Cost ($) 30K ICER $195,725 Clop+PPI ASA+Clop ASA+Clop+PPI 15K 12.1 12.2 12.3 Effectiveness (QALYs) Another Example 45K ASA alone ASA+PPI Clop alone Cost ($) 30K 15K ICER $240,662 Clop+PPI ASA+Clop ASA+Clop+PPI 12.1 12.2 12.3 Effectiveness (QALYs) 28

Sensitivity analysis on PPI cost Cost ($) 45K 30K 15K PPI $3.50 $2.50per tab 12.1 12.2 12.3 Effectiveness (QALYs) ASA alone ASA+PPI Clop alone Clop+PPI ASA+Clop ASA+Clop+PPI Sensitivity analysis on PPI cost Cost ($) 45K 30K 15K PPI $2.40 per tab 12.1 12.2 12.3 Effectiveness (QALYs) ASA alone ASA+PPI Clop alone Clop+PPI ASA+Clop ASA+Clop+PPI 29

Sensitivity analysis on PPI cost Cost ($) 45K 30K 15K PPI $0.75 per tab ICER $50,000 12.1 12.2 12.3 Effectiveness (QALYs) ASA alone ASA+PPI Clop alone Clop+PPI ASA+Clop ASA+Clop+PPI Monte Carlo Analysis: Paroxetine vs Usual Care 84% within budget Cost ($) 36% within budget Effectiveness (QALY) 30

CEAs Don t Tell the Whole Story Limitations of CEAs: Difficult to interpret ICERs sometimes more academic than practical Does not account for underlying prevalence of disease Less useful when effectiveness is similar in competing strategies Does not address budget impact Focusing on Effectiveness: Screening for Varices in Cirrhosis 0.4 days of life is: 9.6 hours Do Nothing 3.94 3.96 3.98 4.0 4.02 4.04 4.06 4.08 4.1 4.12 4.14 4.16 4.18 4.2 Life-Years 0.4 Day Empiric BB Therapy for All 2.4 Months 40,000 heart beats 6900 breaths of air Screen and Treat if Varices 31

Importance of Considering Budget Impact = 1 Endoscopy 30 Bicycle Helmets for Kids Importance of Considering Budget Impact = 1 Endoscopy 100 Flu Vaccinations 32

Importance of Considering Budget Impact = 1 Endoscopy 300 Bottles of Aspirin Budget Impact Question: In a managed care population, what is the per-member per-month (PMPM) cost of paying for endoscopic screening with EGD versus using empiric medical therapy alone? 33

Budget Impact Results Strategy No Screening 1-Year Cost per Cirrhotic $3,824 PMPM $1.59 IPMPM -- Screening $4,432 $1.85 $0.26 * Assuming 0.5% prevalence of cirrhosis in MCO of 1,000,000 covered lives Spiegel et al. Gastrointest Endo 2007 PMPM League Table Intervention Tegaserod for irritable bowel syndrome Sildenafil for erectile dysfunction Screening for varices in cirrhosis Intravenous PPI therapy for ulcer bleeding Rifaximin for hepatic encephalopathy PMPM $0.01 $0.18 $0.26 $2.68 $3.41 Bloom et al. Am J Man Care 2005;11:S27 Cook et al. J Man Care Pharm 2005;11:674 Huang et al. Aliment Pharm Ther 2007;27:1147 Spiegel et al. Clin Gastro Hep 2006;4:988 34

IBS Example (Again) $850 / year $1350 / year BIM Calculations If we assume that a hypothetical MCO has 1,000,000 covered lives, and that the prevalence of IBS is 10%, then: ($1350 / 12 months) x (1,000,000 x 0.1) PMPM SSRI = 1,000,000 = $11.25 ($850 / 12 months) x (1,000,000 x 0.1) PMPM Usual = 1,000,000 = $7.08 IPMPM = $11.25 - $7.08 = $4.17 35

BIM Spreadsheet IBS Budget Impact Model 1-Yr Cost PPPM IPPPM PMPM IPMPM (per patient) SSRI vs. Usual Usual Care $850 $70.83 -- $7.08. SSRI $1,350 $112.50 $41.67 $11.25 $4.17 >> KEY VARIABLES CONTROL PANEL << Covered Lives in MCO (dropdown menu) 1,000,000 Percent with IBS (dropdown menu) 10.00% Total IBS (total lives x prop with HE) 100,000 Changing IBS Prevalence $25 PMPM $20 $15 $10 $4.17 $8.34 SSRI Usual $5 $2.08 $0 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% Prevalence of IBS 36

Take Home Points Most health economic analyses are based on underlying decision model Good models must be comprehensive in competitors and scope We use QALYs as an exchange currency to compare strategies across medicine Interpret ICERs with league table CEAs don t account for prevalance, but BIMs do 37