PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

Similar documents
PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

Nielsen, Jane Hyldgård; Rotevatn, Torill Alise; Peven, Kimberly; Melendez-Torres, G. J.; Sørensen, Erik Elgaard; Overgaard, Charlotte

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

Title: Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions in Indian population: A systematic review

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library)

Rituximab in Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Clinical Practice Guideline, Version 3

Systematic reviews vs. rapid reviews: What s the difference?

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

A Quality Initiative of the Program in Evidence-Based Care (PEBC), Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) Follow-up for Cervical Cancer

Cochrane Breast Cancer Group

The following page contains the final YODA Project review approving this proposal.

2. The effectiveness of combined androgen blockade versus monotherapy.

The MASCC Guidelines Policy

Exercise for People with Cancer

Rituximab in Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Clinical Practice Guideline

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

Quality and Reporting Characteristics of Network Meta-analyses: A Scoping Review

A critical appraisal of: Canadian guideline fysisk aktivitet using the AGREE II Instrument

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

OVERALL CLINICAL BENEFIT

The Effects of High Intensity Interval Training on Cardiovascular Fitness Outcomes in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis

igh-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin - A Canadian Viewpoint from CIHR funded studies Friday May 30, 2014

TITLE: Delivery of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Non-Hospital Settings: A Review of the Safety and Guidelines

Page: 1 / 5 Produced by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Copyright 2018 University of York

Webinar 3 Systematic Literature Review: What you Need to Know

Colour vision screening: a critical appraisal of the literature New Zealand Health Technology Assessment

Summary Report Report on Cancer Statistics in Alberta. February Surveillance and Health Status Assessment Cancer Surveillance

The QUOROM Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of systematic reviews

EVIDENCE IN BRIEF OVERALL CLINICAL BENEFIT

chapter 8 CANCER Is cancer becoming more common? Yes and No.

Ontario s Initiatives in Surgical Quality- The Successes & Where We are Going

MINDFULNESS-BASED INTERVENTIONS IN EPILEPSY

Instructions for Completing the UVMCC Clinical Research Protocol Submission Form UVMCC CLINICAL RESEARCH PROTOCOL SUBMISSION FORM

Follow-up Care, Surveillance Protocol, and Secondary Prevention Measures for Survivors of Colorectal Cancer

A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF ETHICAL ISSUES IN THE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT OF OVARIAN STIMULATION AND OVULATION INDUCTION: CONVERGENCE AND DISJUNCTURE

Trust Guideline for the inclusion of women at High Risk of Breast Cancer in the NHS Breast Screening Programme

COLON CANCER FOLLOW UP GUIDELINES

Optimal Treatment Strategies for Localized Ewing s Sarcoma of Bone after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

2012 Report on Cancer Statistics in Alberta

Effectiveness of CDM-KT strategies addressing multiple high-burden chronic diseases affecting older adults: A systematic review

REPORT ON PROSPECTIVE AUDIT OF LYMPHOMA PATIENTS BORDERS, FIFE, AND LOTHIAN DIAGNOSED IN 2008

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: REFERENCE LIST Side Effect Free Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Cancer: Clinical Effectiveness

Positron emission tomography Medicare Services Advisory Committee

Cancer in Ontario. 1 in 2. Ontarians will develop cancer in their lifetime. 1 in 4. Ontarians will die from cancer

TITLE: Immediate Osseointegrated Implants for Cancer Patients: A Review of Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness

Evaluating the Impact of PET Scanning for Lymphoma Patients: Development of the Ontario PET Lymphoma Staging Registries

The Use of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Curatively Resected Cutaneous Melanoma

diagnosis and initial treatment at one of the 27 collaborating CCSS institutions;

CIHRT Exhibit P-2592 Page 1 APPENDIX. ADAPTE Process for the Treatment of In situ Breast Carcinoma. Eastern Health Breast Disease Site Group

Cancer Prevention and Screening: Working together in NE Aboriginal Communities

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) Produced by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Copyright 2018 University of York.

NUMERATOR: Reports that include the pt category, the pn category and the histologic grade

Step into a healthier brain: A new physical activity toolkit for the prevention and management of Alzheimer s disease

Patient Involvement in Drug Coverage Review Ontario Public Drug Programs Patient Evidence Submissions

Allergen immunotherapy for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and/or asthma

Committee to Evaluate Drugs (CED)

TITLE: Montelukast for Sleep Apnea: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness, Cost Effectiveness, and Guidelines

A systematic review of treatments for severe psoriasis Griffiths C E, Clark C M, Chalmers R J, Li Wan Po A, Williams H C

Outcomes assessed in the review

LCFA/IASLC LORI MONROE SCHOLARSHIP IN TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH 2017 REQUEST FOR APPLICATION (RFA)

Source of effectiveness data The effectiveness evidence was derived from a systematic review of published studies.

The treatment of postnatal depression: a comprehensive literature review Boath E, Henshaw C

A Quality Initiative of the Program in Evidence-based Care (PEBC), Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) Iodine-131 Tositumomab in Lymphoma

Bond University Camilla Dahl Bond University Megan Crichton Bond University Julie Jenkins Bond University

Setting The setting was not clear. The economic study was carried out in the USA.

Canadian Cochrane Network & Centre. Copyright 05/12/2009 by Phil Hahn

Surveillance Programs for Early Stage Non-Seminomatous Testicular Cancer

Docetaxel plus Cyclophosphamide as Adjuvant Therapy for Early, Operable Breast Cancer

PET Steering Committee Meeting Minutes. Wednesday, January 20 th, 2016 Time: 1:30-3:30pm

Cancer Prevention & Control in Adolescent & Young Adult Survivors

ISSUE BRIEF Conference on Clinical Cancer Research November 2014

A Cochrane systematic review of interventions to improve hearing aid use

COMET CLINICAL TRIALS CONSORTIUM. June 2016 Newsletter Volume 4 Issue 6. PG 3 Member and Trials Snapshot. Letter from Dr. Brezden-Masley, Founder

Intervention: ARNI rehabilitation technique delivered by trained individuals. Assessment will be made at 3, 6 and 12 months.

Breast Cancer in Childhood Cancer Survivors: The Impact of Screening on Morbidity

Early integration of palliative care in Ontario: INTEGRATE Quality Improvement Project CAHSPR CONFERENCE MAY 10, 2016

Copyright GRADE ING THE QUALITY OF EVIDENCE AND STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATIONS NANCY SANTESSO, RD, PHD

The pcodr review also provided contextual information on ALK mutation testing.

BRACHYTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER: American Society of Clinical Oncology/Cancer Care Ontario Joint Guideline Update

Transcription:

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews Follow-up care for survivors of lymphoma who have received curative-intent treatment Jonathan Sussman, Norma Varela, Matthew Cheung, Graeme Fraser, Lisa Hicks, Laura Jimenez-Juan, Danny Kraftcheck, Angela Boudreau, Shawn Sajkowski, Robin McQuillan, Jonathan Mandel Citation Jonathan Sussman, Norma Varela, Matthew Cheung, Graeme Fraser, Lisa Hicks, Laura Jimenez-Juan, Danny Kraftcheck, Angela Boudreau, Shawn Sajkowski, Robin McQuillan, Jonathan Mandel. Follow-up care for survivors of lymphoma who have received curative-intent treatment. PROSPERO 2015:CRD42015023548 Available from http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero_rebranding/display_record.asp?id=crd42015023548 Review question(s) What surveillance clinical activities have been shown to be effective at detecting clinical recurrence or further primary lymphoma in asymptomatic survivors who have received curative-intent treatment? What is the appropriate frequency and timing for the surveillance of clinical activities that have been shown to be effective at detecting clinical recurrence or further primary lymphoma in asymptomatic survivors who have received curative-intent treatment? What surveillance activities have been shown to be effective at detecting therapy-related malignancies (breast, lung cancer, other?) following treatment for Lymphoma in asymptomatic survivors who have received curative-intent treatment? Searches 1. Inventory of Cancer Guidelines (SAGE) 2. National Guideline Clearing House 3. CMAJ Infobase 4. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 5. MEDLINE(OVID) 6. EMBASE (OVID) Studies were excluded if they were: 1. Abstracts, letters, case reports, comments, books, notes, or editorial publication types 2. Articles published in a language other than English because resources were not available for translation services Link to search strategy http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prosperofiles/23548_strategy_20160412.pdf Types of study to be included Practice guidelines Systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis Randomized Phase II and III Trials Page: 1 / 5

Other comparative studies If single arm studies included, sample size should be greater than 100. Condition or domain being studied Type of blood cancer that develop in the lymphatic system. The two main types of lymphoma are Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) which is the most curable form of cancer, and non-hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). NHL can act as slow- or fastgrowing cancer. While fast-growing NHL can be cured, treatment for patients with low-grow NHL, may last for many years. According to the National Cancer Institute, approximately 2.1% of men and women will be diagnosed with non- Hodgkin lymphoma at some point during their lifetime, based on 2010-2012 data (http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/nhl.html). Participants/ population Lymphoma survivors who have received curative-intent treatment Intervention(s), exposure(s) Clinical follow-up (medical history and physical examination) Laboratory Investigation Imaging Investigation Less intense vs more intense frequency for follow-up Surveillance for breast and lung cancer Comparator(s)/ control Do not anticipate comparative studies Context Inclusion Criteria: Articles identified in this literature search were eligible for inclusion if they met the following criteria: 1. Primary studies evaluating the the follow-up care for adult and/or adolescent survivors of lymphoma who have received curative-intent treatment. 2. Published full-report articles of randomized or nonrandomized studies with an appropriate control group, decision model studies, and single-arm studies with a sample size of at least 100 patients. 3. Studies reporting the outcomes of interest such as recurrence/relapse rate, overall survival rate, and relapse-free survival rate. Exclusion Criteria: Studies were excluded if they were: 1. Abstracts, letters, case reports, comments, books, notes, or editorial-type Page: 2 / 5

publications. Evidence Summary April 12, 2016 Page 4 2. Articles published in a language other than English because resources were not available for translation services. 3. Single-arm studies with a sample size <100 patients. Outcome(s) Primary outcomes Relapse rate, time to relapse, method of relapse detection and detection rate by follow-up activity. Secondary outcomes N/A Data extraction, (selection and coding) Single reviewer will extract the data with subsequent independent data audit Risk of bias (quality) assessment Risk of bias: no specific tool used Quality assessment: According to study design (e.g. AMSTAR, AGREE II, Information assessment, others) Strategy for data synthesis Descriptive data analysis due to the lack of evidence in this subject. Analysis of subgroups or subsets None Dissemination plans PEBC Reports - CCO Website, Current Oncology Journal Contact details for further information Ms Varela McMaster University - Juravinski Hospital G Wing 2nd Floor 711 Concession Street Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3 varela@mcmaster.ca Organisational affiliation of the review Program in Evidence-based Care https://www.cancercare.on.ca/cms/one.aspx?portalid=1377&pageid=10144 Review team Dr Jonathan Sussman, Juravinski Cancer Centre Page: 3 / 5

Dr Norma Varela, PEBC Dr Matthew Cheung, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre Dr Graeme Fraser, Juravinski Cancer Centre Dr Lisa Hicks, St. Michael's Hospital Dr Laura Jimenez-Juan, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Department of Medical Imaging Dr Danny Kraftcheck, Cancer Care Ontario Ms Angela Boudreau, Odette Cancer Care, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre Mr Shawn Sajkowski, Cancer Care Ontario Patient and Family Advisor Ms Robin McQuillan, Cancer Care Ontario Patient and Family Advisor Dr Jonathan Mandel, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital Anticipated or actual start date 15 July 2015 Anticipated completion date 12 April 2017 Funding sources/sponsors The PEBC is supported by the Ontario MOHLTC through CCO. All work produced by the PEBC is editorially independent from its funding source. Conflicts of interest Nine authors declared no conflicts of interest, and two (JM, LH) declared conflicts. JM reported a potential conflict because if lymphoma imaging indications were to become more liberal, his income as radiologist could potentially increase by more than $10,000. JM also declared that he had received $5,000 or more in a single year, plus other research support from SIEMENS, and he had been principal investigator for a clinical trial involving PET/MR studies. LH declared that she had been a co-principal investigator on a CIHR-industry grant from Gilead Sciences. The COIs declared above did not disqualify any individuals from performing their designated role in the development of this evidence summary, in accordance with the PEBC COI policy. Language English Country Canada Subject index terms status Subject indexing assigned by CRD Subject index terms Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intention; Lymphoma; Survivors Stage of review Completed and published Date of registration in PROSPERO 18 June 2015 Date of publication of this revision 13 May 2016 Details of final report/publication(s) Sussman J, Varela N, Cheung M, Hicks L, Kraftcheck D, Mandel J, et al. Follow-up care for survivors of lymphoma who have received curative-intent treatment. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario; 2016 April 12. Program in Evidence- Page: 4 / 5

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Based Care Evidence Summary No.: 26-5. https://www.cancercare.on.ca/common/pages/userfile.aspx?fileid=359493 DOI 10.15124/CRD42015023548 Stage of review at time of this submission Started Completed Preliminary searches Yes Yes Piloting of the study selection process Yes Yes Formal screening of search results against eligibility criteria Yes Yes Data extraction Yes Yes Risk of bias (quality) assessment Yes Yes Data analysis Yes Yes PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews The information in this record has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites. Page: 5 / 5