UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COUNT ONE

Similar documents
Case 1:13-cr SCJ-JFK Document 1 Filed 01/22/13 Page 1 of 17 SEALED ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INFORMATION. General Allegations. A. Introduction and Background

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IC Chapter 10. Unlawful Sales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 14 cv ( ) Defendants.

Baltimore-to-Central PA cocaine ring dismantled in Operation Last Call; attempts made to run organization from inside state prison

e-cigarette Regulation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case: 5:15-cr DCR-REW Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/01/15 Page: 1 of 15 - Page ID#: 1

LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER NEW ORLEANS CAMPUS DRUG PREVENTION PROGRAM AND POLICY

CIGARETTE FIRE SAFETY AND FIREFIGHTER PROTECTION ACT Act of Jul. 4, 2008, P.L. 518, No. 42 Cl. 35 AN ACT

Report Information from ProQuest

PREVENTION OF MINORS' ACCESS TO TOBACCO

These Rules of Membership apply in respect of all Products purchased by a Member from Sigma (and any Program Partner) on or after 1 February 2017.

FILE U.S. DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENN.

Police Department City of Keene, New Hampshire. 6a/'f. Concerns Over Growing Drug Problem in Keene

CHAPTER 52 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE

CANNABIS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION REGULATIONS

GENERAL INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS

DEA Intelligence BRIEF

Acetic Anhydride Trafficking to Afghanistan. - UNODC Afghan Opiate Trade Project -

ACTIVITIES SMUGGLING

States with Authority to Require Nonresident Pharmacies to Report to PMP

Multnomah County s biggest drug bust ever on February 23rd, 2017 This bust of more than 100 pounds of meth highlights a new trend in drug

CHAPTER 132: DRUGS; PARAPHERNALIA. Section Unlawful acts Definition Offenses Exceptions Civil forfeiture

Associates, llc, for its Complaint against the defendants, Gary K. DeJohn, Sr. and DeJohn

Narco Business and Violence en México. December

(U) Cocaine/Fentanyl Combination in Pennsylvania

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. Class E Felony. Class C Felony

Fact Sheet: Drug Data Summary

Case 2:12-cv KJM-GGH Document 1 Filed 07/02/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. (Sacramento Division)

Commanding Officer, Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point Distribution List

Pennsylvania s highest prescriber of pain medication arrested along with several patients in Lawrence County

ORDINANCE NO. City Attorney s Synopsis

SONOMA COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CHIEFS ASSOCIATION

The 2015 Heroin Signature Program Report

Fact Sheet: Drug Data Summary

SENATE BILL No. 676 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 28, 2011 AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 31, Introduced by Senator Leno.

The purchaser has read and acknowledged Factory Direct Hearing s Terms of Service as outlined on our website:

Section Processing

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DEFAMATION

Navigating Minnesota s New Drug Laws

SWALLOWING THE WRONG PILL Criminal Drug Diversion By Physicians and Other Medical Professionals A Prosecutor s Perspective

INGHAM COUNTY. Effective January 1, 2016 as amended November 10, 2015

CHAPTER Council Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1167

ORDINANCE NO

2016 National Drug Price and Purity Data

ORDINANCE NO

CHAPTER 86. AN ACT concerning reduced cigarette ignition propensity and supplementing Title 54 of the Revised Statutes.

Chapter TOBACCO RETAILER'S PERMIT

4.31 RESTRICTIONS ON SALE OR GIFT OF CIGARETTES OR TOBACCO PRODUCTS TO MINORS THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF DOUGLAS COUNTY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SENATE, No. 359 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION

FURNITURE TERMS / POLICIES. TERMS OF FURNITURE SALE [agreement is required with all orders] FURNITURE ORDERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Follow this and additional works at:

Ohio. MICHIGAN L a k e E r i e NORTHERN OHIO OHIO FRANKLIN SOUTHERN OHIO. Figure 1. Ohio High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area.

Senate File Introduced

The Drugs Scenario - Global, Regional and National

CHAPTER 120: TOBACCO

Product Liability Update

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Memorandum

STATE OF NEW JERSEY Division of Gaming Enforcement CASINO HOTEL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE MERCHANDISING PERMIT APPLICATION

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

As used in this policy, "unauthorized drugs" are all drugs not defined herein as authorized drugs.

THE OPTICAL SOCIETY ONLINE JOURNALS SINGLE SITE LICENSE AGREEMENT

(City, State, Zip Code)

From%the%Source%to%the%Street% Michigan(Law(Enforcement(&(Prosecution(Strategies:( Combating(Upper(Tier(Drug(Trafficking(

F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HJR

Drug Intelligence Brief

The Cannabis Control (Saskatchewan) Regulations

PRODUCTS: All products containing ephedrine (EPH) and pseudoephedrine (PSE). (IC )

ORDINANCE NO The Town Council of the Town of Yucca Valley, California, ( Town ) does ordain as follows:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

Federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis

ARKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY GOVERNING PRINCIPLES FOR THE USE OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES IN RESEARCH

NC General Statutes - Chapter 90 Article 5E 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INTRODUCTION

Ohio High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area

The Drug War and the Resurgence of Mexico s Heroin Trade Nancy Cortés MAIR Capstone Spring 2015

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2007 Session. FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE Revised

USA v. Holstick et al View Document View Docket

Overview 1. Board of Directors 2. Investigations 3. Persons Arrested 4. Arrest Counts 5. Intelligence Reports 6. Search Warrants 6.

Controlled Substances Program. For Academic Units

Medical Cannabis Comes to Maryland: What Finance Professionals Need to Know About this Budding Industry

Cannabis Legalization August 22, Ministry of Attorney General Ministry of Finance

ORDINANCE NO

South Carolina UPDATE. Drug Threat Assessment. National Drug Intelligence Center U.S. Department of Justice. June 2002

April 7, You have asked me to prepare an opinion letter regarding the legal status of cannabidiol ( CBD ).

OVERVIEW OF STATE OPIOID POLICY AND LEGISLATION AMBER WIDGERY & ALISON LAWRENCE JUNE 2018

Current through Chapter 199 and Chapters of the 2015 Legislative Session

ILLEGAL DISTRIBUTION OF CIGARETTES OR OTHER TOBACCO PRODUCTS; TRANSACTION SCANS.

Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Attorney General Corbett announces 41 Erie drug arrests linked to $5 million cocaine and marijuana organization in Operation Diamond Drop

IDAHO STATUTE to AND STATE OF IDAHO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

Drug Possession with Intent to Distribute or Trafficking Drugs in Texas

U.N. IN ACTION TAJIKISTAN S DRUG CRISIS

PC RESOLUTION NO XX

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD. In Re: ) ) NOTICE OF CHARGES Amir Ishak Kaldas, M.D., ) AND ALLEGATIONS; ) NOTICE OF HEARING Respondent.

A. The unlawful possession, use, distribution, manufacture, or dispensing of illicit drugs on EVMS property or at an EVMS off-campus activity.

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA, a/k/a AB-L, a/k/a El Barbas, MANUEL LAST NAME UNKNOWN, a/k/a Manny, a/k/a El Musico, and MANUEL FERNANDEZ-NAVARRO, a/k/a La Puerca No. 09 CR Violations: Title 21, United States Code, Sections 841, 846, 952(a, 960, 963 INDICTMENT UNDER SEAL COUNT ONE The SPECIAL FEBRUARY 2008-2 GRAND JURY charges: 1. Beginning no later than in or about February 2007, and continuing until on or about December 1, 2008, at Chicago, in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, and elsewhere, ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA, a/k/a AB-L, a/k/a El Barbas, MANUEL LAST NAME UNKNOWN, a/k/a Manny, a/k/a El Musico, and MANUEL FERNANDEZ-NAVARRO, a/k/a La Puerca, defendants herein, did conspire with each other, with Pedro Flores and Margarito Flores, and with others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, knowingly and intentionally to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute controlled substances, namely 5 kilograms or more -1-

of mixtures and substances containing a detectable amount of cocaine, a Schedule II Narcotic Drug Controlled Substance, and 1 kilogram or more of mixtures and substances containing a detectable amount of heroin, a Schedule I Narcotic Drug Controlled Substance, in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 841(a(1. The Participants in the Conspiracy 2. It was part of the conspiracy that defendant ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA directed a cocaine and heroin drug trafficking organization in Mexico commonly known to its members and its associates as the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, which obtained multiton quantities of cocaine and heroin, and smuggled multi-kilogram quantities of cocaine and heroin into the United States from Mexico and elsewhere. ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA was a leader of the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, and was ultimately responsible for its operation. 3. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant MANUEL LAST NAME UNKNOWN ( MANUEL LNU was associated with the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, and acted as a logistical coordinator who coordinated deliveries of multi-kilogram quantities of cocaine and heroin into the United States on behalf of defendant ARTURO BELTRAN- LEYVA and the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, and deliveries of millions of dollars of cash narcotics proceeds to ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA and the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL from its customers in the United States. 4. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant MANUEL FERNANDEZ- NAVARRO was associated with the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, and acted as a narcotics -2-

broker for, and a customer of, the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL. In conjunction with the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, MANUEL FERNANDEZ-NAVARRO received deliveries of multi-kilogram quantities of cocaine and heroin in the United States and elsewhere which were distributed in the United States, and subsequently made deliveries of cash to ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA and the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL from the proceeds of cocaine and heroin sold in the United States. 5. It was further part of the conspiracy that the Pedro and Margarito Flores ( the Flores Brothers and their associates (collectively, the Flores Crew operated a wholesale cocaine and heroin distribution organization that distributed thousands of kilograms of cocaine and multi-kilogram quantities of heroin in the Chicago, Illinois, area and elsewhere, supplied in substantial part through a continuing relationship with ARTURO BELTRAN- LEYVA, MANUAL LNU, and the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL. The Operation of the Conspiracy 6. At times during the conspiracy, ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA and members of the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL were affiliated with a group of cocaine and heroin trafficking organizations in Mexico commonly known to its members and associates as the the Federation. The Federation was comprised of an alliance of several drug trafficking organizations including, among others, the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL and an organization commonly known to its members and its associates as the Sinaloa Cartel. In approximately early 2008, a split occurred between the Federation and the Sinaloa Cartel, including two of its leaders Joaquin Guzman-Loera and Ismael Zambada-Garcia, on the one -3-

hand, and ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA and the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, on the other. This split resulted in the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL ending its alliance with the Sinaloa Cartel and the rest of the Federation. After this split, the Sinaloa Cartel and its allies, and the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL and its allies, became engaged in a violent war in Mexico over various issues, including control of lucrative narcotics trafficking routes into the United States, and the loyalty of wholesale narcotics customers, including but not limited to, the Flores Brothers. 7. At times during the conspiracy, ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA and members of the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL coordinated their narcotics trafficking activities with other affiliated cartels. 8. It was further part of the conspiracy that ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA, MANUEL LNU, and members of the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL arranged for the transportation of multi-ton quantities of cocaine from Central and South American countries, including Colombia and Panama, to the interior of Mexico, and arranged for the transportation of multi-ton quantities of cocaine, generally in shipments of hundreds of kilograms at a time, as well as multi-kilogram shipments of heroin, from the interior of Mexico to the United States border, and then into and throughout the United States, using various means, including but not limited to private aircraft, submarines and other submersible and semi-submersible vessels, container ships, go-fast boats, fishing vessels, buses, tractor trailers, and automobiles. 9. It was further part of the conspiracy that ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA, -4-

MANUEL LNU, and members of the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, agreed with the Flores Brothers to use the Flores Crew to distribute multi-kilogram quantities of cocaine and heroin in Chicago, Illinois and elsewhere. 10. It was further part of the conspiracy that at certain times during the conspiracy, Pedro Flores and Margarito Flores agreed with MANUEL FERNANDEZ-NAVARRO to jointly purchase and distribute from Chicago, Illinois and elsewhere, multi-kilogram quantities of cocaine from ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA, MANUEL LNU, and members of the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL. 11. It was further part of the conspiracy that at certain times during the conspiracy, the Flores Crew obtained and distributed from Chicago, Illinois and elsewhere, on average, approximately 1500 to 2000 kilograms of cocaine per month, and received a substantial portion of that quantity from ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA, MANUEL LNU, and members of the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL. 12. It was further part of the conspiracy that ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA, MANUEL LNU, and members of the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, provided the Flores Crew with multi-kilogram quantities of heroin, for distribution to others in Chicago, Illinois and elsewhere. 13. It was further part of the conspiracy that ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA, MANUEL LNU, and members of the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, fronted multikilogram quantities of cocaine and heroin to the Flores Crew and others, which means that ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA and members of the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, -5-

provided cocaine and heroin to the Flores Crew and others on consignment, without payment at the time of delivery. Payment was subsequently made by the Flores Crew and others after some or all of the cocaine and heroin was sold to customers of the Flores Crew. 14. It was further part of the conspiracy that for some shipments of narcotics from the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, the Flores Crew received the cocaine and heroin in the greater Chicago, Illinois area. For other shipments, the Flores Crew received the cocaine and heroin in the greater Los Angeles, California area, where truck drivers for the Flores Crew transported the cocaine and heroin to the greater Chicago, Illinois area for further distribution. For other shipments, the Flores Crew received the cocaine and heroin in Mexico, where truck drivers for the Flores Crew transported the cocaine and heroin to the greater Chicago, Illinois area for further distribution. (a Among the shipments received from the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, in approximately May 2007, Pedro Flores and Margarito Flores agreed to purchase between approximately 9 and 11 kilograms of heroin from defendant ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA and the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL. On or about May 13, 2007, law enforcement seized approximately 9 kilograms of heroin in Berwyn, Illinois, before the heroin could be distributed in the Chicago, Illinois area. On or about May 13, 2007, law enforcement also seized approximately $1,100,000 in United States currency in Berwyn, Illinois in the same residence from which the approximately 9 kilograms of heroin were recovered. (b Among the shipments received from the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, in or about November 2008, Pedro Flores, Margarito Flores, and MANUEL FERNANDEZ- -6-

NAVARRO agreed to purchase approximately 1040 kilograms of cocaine from defendant ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA and the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL. The logistics of this cocaine transaction were arranged by defendant MANUEL LNU. Before this cocaine could be transported to or distributed in the Chicago, Illinois area, the cocaine was seized by law enforcement in the Los Angeles, California area. Specifically, on or about November 15, 2008, law enforcement seized approximately 600 kilograms of cocaine in the Los Angeles, California area; on or about November 21, 2008, law enforcement seized approximately 290 kilograms of cocaine in the Los Angeles, California area; and on or about November 30, 2008, law enforcement seized approximately 154 kilograms of cocaine in the Los Angeles, California area. On or about November 30, 2008, law enforcement also seized approximately $407,547 in United States currency in the Los Angeles, California area in the same residence from which the approximately 154 kilograms of cocaine were recovered. 15. It was further part of the conspiracy that the Flores Crew used several warehouse locations to unload and store shipments of cocaine and heroin received from the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL in the greater Chicago, Illinois area. 16. It was further part of the conspiracy that ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA, MANUEL LNU, and members of the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, caused the delivery of large quantities of cocaine and heroin within the Chicago area and elsewhere to members of the Flores Crew for further distribution. The Flores Crew in turn sold the cocaine and heroin for cash to wholesale customers in the Chicago, Illinois area, as well as to customers in Detroit, Michigan; Cincinnati, Ohio; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Washington, D.C.; New -7-

York, New York; Vancouver, British Columbia; Columbus, Ohio; and elsewhere. Wholesale customers in these cities further distributed the cocaine and heroin to other cities, including Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 17. It was further part of the conspiracy that several members of the Flores Crew were responsible for: (a unloading narcotics shipments; (b delivering the narcotics to one of several storage locations used by the Flores Crew; (c separating narcotics deliveries into smaller amounts to be distributed to customers of the Flores Crew; and (d delivering narcotics to customers of the Flores Crew. 18. It was further part of the conspiracy that members of the Flores Crew were responsible for: (1 collecting and picking up payment from customers of the Flores Crew; (2 delivering this money to various storage locations used by the Flores Crew; (3 counting and packaging the money; and (4 reporting cash receipts to the Flores Brothers. 19. It was further part of the conspiracy that members of the Flores Crew and other co-conspirators counted the cash narcotics proceeds and packaged them so that they could be delivered to couriers who would transport them back to Mexico. Members of the Flores Crew then delivered, and caused to be delivered, millions of dollars in cash narcotics proceeds to other co-conspirators, including members of the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, who would smuggle the proceeds back to Mexico. 20. It was further part of the conspiracy that ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA, MANUEL LNU, and members of the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, regularly received multi-million dollar payments from the Flores Crew after the delivery of cocaine and heroin -8-

was made to the Flores Crew. ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA, MANUEL LNU, and members of the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, transported and caused the transportation of large quantities of United States Currency from the sale of cocaine and heroin from locations in the United States to locations in Mexico. 21. It was further part of the conspiracy that the Flores Crew maintained ledgers, in paper and electronic form, which tracked information relating to the Flores Crew s drugtrafficking activities, including, but not limited to: (1 amounts of narcotics received; (2 money sent to sources of supply; (3 amounts of narcotics delivered to customers of the Flores Crew; (4 the courier or couriers responsible for particular deliveries to customers; (5 money received from customers; and (6 payments to members of the Flores Crew. 22. It was further part of the conspiracy that members of the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL and Flores Crew, utilized various means to communicate with each other, including but not limited to cellular telephones, radios, computers, and hand-held PDAs to facilitate their drug trafficking activities. 23. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendants used coded language and other means to misrepresent, conceal and hide, and to cause to be misrepresented, concealed and hidden, the drug trafficking activities of the conspiracy, and to avoid detection and apprehension by law enforcement authorities. 24. It was further part of the conspiracy that ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA and members of the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, utilized various means to evade law enforcement and protect their narcotics distribution activities, including bribery of corrupt -9-

officials; violence and threats of violence; and intimidation of law enforcement, rival narcotics traffickers, and members of their own drug trafficking organizations. 25. It was further part of the conspiracy that ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA and members of the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, utilized various means to ensure they received payment for their narcotics distribution activities, including violence and threats of violence. 26. It was further part of the conspiracy that ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA and members of the BELTRAN-LEYVA CARTEL, utilized various means to protect and further their narcotics distribution activities from rival narcotics trafficking organizations, including but not limited to the Sinaloa Cartel. These means included, but were not limited to, threatening acts of violence to their wholesale narcotics distributors, including the Flores Brothers, if they engaged in narcotics trafficking with rival cartels, including the Sinaloa Cartel; All in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 846 and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2. -10-

COUNT TWO The SPECIAL FEBRUARY 2008-2 GRAND JURY further charges: 1. The Grand Jury realleges and incorporates by reference Count One of this indictment as though fully set forth herein. 2. Beginning no later than in or about February 2007, and continuing until on or about December 1, 2008, at Chicago, in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, and elsewhere, ARTURO BELTRAN LEYVA, a/k/a AB-L, a/k/a El Barbas, MANUEL LAST NAME UNKNOWN, a/k/a Manny, a/k/a El Musico, and MANUEL FERNANDEZ-NAVARRO, a/k/a La Puerca, defendants herein, did conspire with each other, with Pedro Flores and Margarito Flores, and with other persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury, knowingly and intentionally to import into the customs territory of the United States from a place outside the United States, namely, Mexico, a controlled substance, namely, more than 5 kilograms of mixtures and substances containing a detectable amount of cocaine, a Schedule II Narcotic Drug Controlled Substance, and more than 1 kilogram of mixtures and substances containing a detectable amount of heroin, a Schedule I Narcotic Drug Controlled Substance, in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 952(a and 960; All in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 963, and Title 18, United -11-

States Code, Section 2. -12-

COUNT THREE The SPECIAL FEBRUARY 2008-2 GRAND JURY further charges: On or about November 15, 2008, at Chicago, in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, and elsewhere, ARTURO BELTRAN LEYVA, a/k/a AB-L, a/k/a El Barbas, MANUEL LAST NAME UNKNOWN, a/k/a Manny, a/k/a El Musico, and MANUEL FERNANDEZ-NAVARRO, a/k/a La Puerca, defendants herein, did attempt to knowingly and intentionally possess with intent to distribute, and did attempt to cause the possession with intent to distribute, a controlled substance, namely, 5 kilograms or more of mixtures and substances containing a detectable amount of cocaine, a Schedule I Narcotic Drug Controlled Substance, in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 841(a(1; All in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 846 and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2. -13-

FORFEITURE ALLEGATION The SPECIAL FEBRUARY 2008-2 GRAND JURY further charges: 1. The allegations of Counts One, Two and Three of this Indictment are realleged and incorporated by reference as if fully restated herein for the purpose of alleging that certain property is subject to forfeiture to the United States pursuant to the provisions of Title 21, United States Code, Section 853. 2. As a result of their violations of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 841(a(1, 846, and 963, as alleged in the foregoing Indictment, ARTURO BELTRAN LEYVA, a/k/a AB-L, a/k/a El Barbas, MANUEL LAST NAME UNKNOWN, a/k/a Manny, a/k/a El Musico, and MANUEL FERNANDEZ-NAVARRO, a/k/a La Puerca, defendants herein, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(a(1 and (2: (1 any and all property constituting or derived from, any proceeds they obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of the violations; and (2 any and all of property used, or intended to be used, in any manner or part, to commit or facilitate the commission of the violations. 3. The interests of the defendants, jointly and severally, subject to forfeiture to the United States pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853, include, but are not limited to: $885,000,000 in United States Currency, representing the estimated proceeds of defendants narcotics distribution organization. -14-

All pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853. A TRUE BILL: FOREPERSON UNITED STATES ATTORNEY -15-