Santi Trimarchi, MD, PhD Vascular Surgeon Thoracic Aortic Research Center, Director IRCCS Policlinico San Donato University of Milan

Similar documents
Performance of the conformable GORE TAG device in Type B aortic dissection from the GORE GREAT real world registry

Role of Gender in TEVAR and EVAR results from the GREAT registry

Abdominal and thoracic aneurysm repair

How to achieve a successful proximal sealing in TEVAR? Pr L Canaud

Development of a Branched LSA Endograft & Ascending Aorta Endograft

La sindrome aortica acuta oggi

Challenges with Complex Anatomies Advancing Care in Endovascular Aortic Treatment

GORE TAG Thoracic Endoprosthesis ANNUAL CLINICAL UPDATE SEPTEMBER 2018 Abstract. Section I GORE TAG Device Clinical experience. Section II Conformable

Thoracic Aortic Research Center. University of Milan

Introducing the GORE TAG Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL System

DISCLOSURES ISOLATED DTA LESION? TYPE B DISSECTIONS TREATMENT OPTIONS

RETROGRADE BRANCH. Gustavo S. Oderich MD Professor of Surgery Director of Endovascular Therapy Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Arch Repair with the Bolton Medical RelayBranch Thoracic Stent-graft system: Multicenter experience

Re-interventions after TEVAR:

Jean M Panneton, MD Professor of Surgery Program Director Vascular Surgery Chief EVMS. Arch Pathology: The Endovascular Era is here

TEVAR for the Ascending Aorta

Redo treatment and open conversion after TEVAR

Challenges. 1. Sizing. 2. Proximal landing zone 3. Distal landing zone 4. Access vessels 5. Spinal cord ischemia 6. Endoleak

UC SF. Disclosures. Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair 4/24/2009. Management of Acute Dissections: Is There Still a Role for Open Surgery?

Clinical experience with a new thoracic stent graft system (Ankura TM ). Procedural analysis, 30 days and 6-month results in a single center study

Neurological Complications of TEVAR. Frank J Criado, MD. Union Memorial-MedStar Health Baltimore, MD USA

EVAR and TEVAR: Extending Their Use for Rupture and Traumatic Injury. Conflict of Interest. Hypotensive shock 5/5/2014. none

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) Indications and Basic Procedure

Advances in Treatment of Traumatic Aortic Transection

Aortic Arch pathology options: Open,Hybrid, fenestration, Chimney or branched stent-graft?

Going the distance: Conformable Gore TAG device demonstrates durable outcomes over the long. D.Böckler University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany

Aortic Center of Excellence at Sentara

Endoanchor-assisted TEVAR

OPEN REOPERATIONS FOR COMPLICATIONS OF ENDOVASCULAR AORTIC PROCEDURES: TIP OF THE ICEBERG?

Preliminary Data from the Gore EXCLUDER Thoracoabdominal Branch Endoprosthesis Early Feasibility Study

Endovascular therapy for Ischemic versus Nonischemic complicated acute type B aortic dissection (catbad).

Management of Acute Aortic Syndromes. M. Grabenwoger, MD Dept. of Cardiovascular Surgery Hospital Hietzing, Vienna, Austria

Objective assessment of current stent grafts: which graft for which lesion. Ludovic Canaud, MD, PhD Pierre Alric, MD, PhD Montpellier, France

INCRAFT system: Update from the Pivotal INSPIRATION Study

Combined Endovascular and Surgical Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Pathology: Hybrid TEVAR

The Petticoat Technique Managing Type B Dissection with both Early and Long Term Considerations

Toward Total Endovascular Therapy of the Aorta. Adam W. Beck, MD. Associate Professor of Surgery Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy

Technique and Outcome of Laser Fenestration For Arch Vessels

Endovascular Stent Grafts for Disorders of the Thoracic Aorta

TEVAR for Chronic dissections: indications for TEVAR, long term results

The natural history of uncomplicated type B dissection, PAU and IMH: the IRAD knowledge. Santi Trimarchi, MD, PhD

I have the following financial relationships to disclose:

Endovascular Management of Thoracic Aortic Pathology Stéphan Haulon, J Sobocinski, B Maurel, T Martin-Gonzalez, R Spear, A Hertault, R Azzaoui

European Experience with a New Thoracic Device. D.Böckler University Hospital Heidelberg Germany

Hostile Neck During EVAR, The Role Of Endoanchores

Bilateral use of the Gore IBE device for bilateral CIA aneurysms and a first interim analysis of the prospective Iceberg registry

Title. Different arch branched devices are available, is morphology the. main criteria of choice? Ciro Ferrer, MD

Antegrade Thoracic Stent Grafting during Repair of Acute Debakey I Dissection: Promotes Distal Aortic Remodeling and Reduces Late Open Re-operation

ENCORE, a Study to Investigate the Durability of Polymer EVAR with Ovation A Contemporary Review of 1296 Patients

Early Clinical Results with the Valiant Mona LSA Branch Stent-Graft

Percutaneous Approaches to Aortic Disease in 2018

Indications for use. Contraindications within the United States

CT Imaging of Blunt and Penetrating Vascular Trauma DENNIS FOLEY MEDICAL COLLEGE WISCONSIN

Mechanisms of and treatment strategies for dsine after TEVAR for acute and chronic type B aortic dissection- insights from EuREC.

THORACOABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS HYBRID REPAIR

TEVAR FOR! THORACIC AORTIC TRAUMA"

Development of Stent Graft. Kato et al. Development of an expandable intra-aortic prothesis for experimental aortic dissection.

Surgical Considerations of TEVAR

No Disclosure. Aortic Dissection in Japan. This. The Challenge of Acute and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissections with Endovascular Aortic Repair

Off-the-Shelf Devices. Mark A Farber, MD FACS Director, Aortic Center Professor of Radiology and Surgery University of North Carolina

I-Hui Wu, M.D. Ph.D. Clinical Assistant Professor Cardiovascular Surgical Department National Taiwan University Hospital

Jean M. Panneton, MD, FRCSC, FACS. Professor of Surgery, Chief & Program Director Division of Vascular Surgery. Norfolk, VA

Description. Section: Surgery Effective Date: October 15, 2016 Subsection: Surgery Original Policy Date: December 7, 2011 Subject:

Aggressive Resection/Reconstruction of the Aortic Arch in Type A Dissection

Experience of endovascular procedures on abdominal and thoracic aorta in CA region

Aortic Neck Issues Associated Clinical Sequelae/Implications for Graft Choice

Treating very short necks ( 4mm <10mm) using the Endurant stent graft + EndoAnchors: 1-year results and current insights

Open fenestration for complicated acute aortic B dissection

Taming The Aorta. David Minion, MD Program Director, Vascular Surgery University of Kentucky Medical Center Lexington, Kentucky, USA

Endovascular Stent Grafts for Disorders of the Thoracic Aorta

IMH/Penetrating Aortic Ulcers/ Saccular Aneurysms: How to manage and when to intervene

UC SF Early Intervention in Type B Dissection: Results From the INSTEAD XL Trial. Acute Type B Dissection. Outline. Disclosures.

Subclavian Artery Plug Embolization (SAPE study): a real experience about endovascular subclavian occlusion prior to thoracic vascular repair

Optimal Treatment of Chronic Dissection

Improving Endograft Durability with EndoAnchors

Mid-term results from ANCHOR: How does this data influence the treatment algorithm for hostile EVAR anatomies

Subject: Endovascular Stent Grafts for Disorders of the Thoracic Aorta

Ovation. Sean Lyden, MD Department Chair, Vascular Surgery Cleveland Clinic

GORE EXCLUDER AAA Endoprosthesis ANNUAL CLINICAL UPDATE OCTOBER Section I Clinical experience. Section II Worldwide commercial experience

Endovascular Treatment of Type II Endoleak Following TEVAR for Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: Squeeze Technique to Reach the Aneurysmal Sac

Patient selection in Hostile Necks and how. to prevent endoleaks a word of caution

Changing Spectrum of Re-Interventions following TEVAR. 31 st Annual Florida Vascular Society. PENN Surgery

Aortic stents, types, selection, tricks in deployment.

Intravascular Ultrasound in the Treatment of Complex Aortic Pathologies. Naixin Kang, M.D. Vascular Surgery Fellow April 26 th, 2018

Techniques For Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair. Mario Lachat, MD University Hospital of Zurich Matteo Orrico, MD San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome

Is there a way to predict the risk in uncomplicated Type B aortic dissections? FRANS MOLL University Medical Centre Utrecht - Netherlands

Durable outcomes. Proven performance.

Acute dissections of the descending thoracic aorta (Debakey

Influence of patient selection and IFU compliance on outcomes following EVAS

Low profile TEVAR: is it an added value? Michel Bosiers, G. Torsello Münster

Influence of Oversizing on Outcome in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Current State of Thoracic Branch Devices and Ongoing Clinical Trials

Three year experience with multilayer stent in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aneurysms no evidence for aneurysm stabilization

Optimal repair of acute aortic dissection

Current Status of EVAR for Infrarenal AAA. 31 st Annual Florida Vascular Society. PENN Surgery

14F OD Ovation Abdominal Stent Graft System

Clinical Trials of Acute and Chronic Dissections. Gregory Landry MD

Standardization of the CHEVAR procedure: How a standard approach has improved outcomes. Prof Peter Holt St George s, London

Thoracic aortic trauma A.T.O.ABDOOL-CARRIM ACADEMIC HEAD VASCULAR SURGERY DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY UNIVERSITY OF WITWATERSRAND

Durability of The Endurant Stent-Graft through 5 Years

Transcription:

The Gore GREAT Registry: Update about a real life data collection Santi Trimarchi, MD, PhD Vascular Surgeon Thoracic Aortic Research Center, Director IRCCS Policlinico San Donato University of Milan

Disclosures Grants: Italian National Research Council (CNR), CARIPLO Foundation, San Donato Foundation, Gore WL. Consultant: Gore WL, Medtronic inc. PI: GREAT registry

Overview Observational (on-label and off-label use)

Overview Observational (on-label and off-label use) 5000 patients at up to 300 sites worldwide

Overview Observational (on-label and off-label use) 5000 patients at up to 300 sites worldwide Commercial aortic endovascular products in global markets (US, EU, Australia, New Zealand, and Brazil)

GREAT Objectives Gore has developed an Aortic Registry to: Identify global trends in device usage Track long-term device performance and patient outcomes Post-marketing surveillance requirements Provide worldwide exposure on Gore product effectiveness Become a global clinical research organization to include sites OUS for investigational product evaluations

GREAT Objectives Gore has developed an Aortic Registry to: Identify global trends in device usage Track long-term device performance and patient outcomes Post-marketing surveillance requirements Provide worldwide exposure on Gore product effectiveness Become a global clinical research organization to include sites OUS for investigational product evaluations

GREAT Overview Outcomes Evaluation (EVAR and TEVAR) GRT 10-11 Demographics, Medical History, Case Planning, Treatment Post-Treatment follow-up through 10 years including any Serious Adverse Events

GREAT Overview Outcomes Evaluation (EVAR and TEVAR) GRT 10-11 Demographics, Medical History, Case Planning, Treatment Post-Treatment follow-up through 10 years including any Serious Adverse Events Gore Excluder featuring C3 Delivery System GRT 10-12

GREAT Overview Outcomes Evaluation (EVAR and TEVAR) GRT 10-11 Demographics, Medical History, Case Planning, Treatment Post-Treatment follow-up through 10 years including any Serious Adverse Events Gore Excluder featuring C3 Delivery System GRT 10-12 Primary Objectives Evaluate procedural outcomes, to include: Estimation of the number of aortic extenders required per case Qualitative assessment of the repositioning capabilities of the device Qualitative assessments of device deployment accuracy

GREAT Data Quality Database design: Data points must meet data standard conformity Critical data points identified System queries generated

GREAT Data Quality Database design: Data points must meet data standard conformity Critical data points identified System queries generated In-house data monitoring: Independent reviewers Adverse Event Reviews Manual queries generated

GREAT Data Quality Database design: Data points must meet data standard conformity Critical data points identified System queries generated In-house data monitoring: Independent reviewers Adverse Event Reviews Manual queries generated Site monitoring: For cause monitoring & site support Monitoring plan revised based on observations and need

Overall Enrollment and Follow up by Region 2331 pts

Enrollment - thoracic 390 subjects enrolled with a thoracic aortic diseases 28 in the aortic arch 19 in the ascending aorta 343 in the descending thoracic aorta

Aortic Pathologies - Descending Descending Thoracic aortic aneurysm 43% Type B complicated aortic dissection 18% Type B uncomplicated aortic dissection 13% Penetrating aortic ulcer 10% Traumatic aortic transection 7% Other 5% Descending Thoracic aneurysm rupture 2% Intramural hematoma 2% Pseudoaneurysm 1% Aortic coarctation < 1% Aorto-bronchial fistula Ascending Thoracic aneurysm rupture

Demographics Descending Male Female 71% 29% Age (ys) Mean (std dev) 65(14)

Treatment - Descending Procedure Survival 99% Median Hospital stay (days) 6

Treatment - Descending Procedure Survival 99% Median Hospital stay (days) 6 Thoracic Landing Zone Z0 3% Z1 5% Z2 24% Z3 52% Z4 16%

Aortic Branch Vessel Data Descending Aortic Branch Vessel Procedure 21%

Aortic Branch Vessel Data Descending Aortic Branch Vessel Procedure 21% Brachiocelphalic Trunk N=9 Covered/embolized 0 Surgical de-branch 78% Stent only 11% Chimney 11%

Aortic Branch Vessel Data Descending Aortic Branch Vessel Procedure 21% Brachiocelphalic Trunk N=9 Covered/embolized 0 Surgical de-branch 78% Stent only 11% Chimney 11% Left Common Carotid N=23 Covered/embolized 0 Surgical de-branch 78% Stent only 13% Chimney 9%

Aortic Branch Vessel Data Descending Aortic Branch Vessel Procedure 21% Brachiocelphalic Trunk N=9 Covered/embolized 0 Surgical de-branch 78% Stent only 11% Chimney 11% Left Common Carotid N=23 Covered/embolized 0 Surgical de-branch 78% Stent only 13% Chimney 9% Left Subclavian N=52 Covered/embolized 25% Surgical de-branch 64% Stent only 4% Chimney 14%

Pre-Treatment - Descending Lesion Diameter (mm) Mean (Std Dev) 61.7(13.8) Median 60.5 Range (7.5,110.0)

Pre-Treatment - Descending Lesion Diameter (mm) Mean (Std Dev) 61.7(13.8) Median 60.5 Range (7.5,110.0) Proximal Neck Length (cm) Mean (Std Dev) 5.0(4.2) Median 3.5 Range (0.5, 30.0)

Pre-Treatment - Descending Lesion Diameter (mm) Mean (Std Dev) 61.7(13.8) Median 60.5 Range (7.5,110.0) Proximal Neck Length (cm) Mean (Std Dev) 5.0(4.2) Median 3.5 Range (0.5, 30.0)

Pre-Treatment - Descending Lesion Diameter (mm) Mean (Std Dev) 61.7(13.8) Median 60.5 Range (7.5,110.0) Proximal Neck Length (cm) Mean (Std Dev) 5.0(4.2) Median 3.5 Range (0.5, 30.0) Distal Neck Length (cm) Mean (Std Dev) 7.1(6.5) Median 5.0 Range (0.0,30.0)

Serious Device Events Descending Total Procedure 1 Month 6 Months 1 Year 2 year Serious 0.3% 4.6% 5.0% 2.0% 0 3.8% Endoleak 1 Type IA 1 1 1 0 0 0.9% Type IB 1 2 3 1 0 2.0% Type II 0 2 1 1 0 1.2% Type III 0 1 0 0 0 0.3% Type IV 0 0 0 0 0 0

Serious Device Events Descending Total Procedure 1 Month 6 Months 1 Year 2 year Serious 0.3% 4.6% 5.0% 2.0% 0 3.8% Endoleak 1 Type IA 1 1 1 0 0 0.9% Type IB 1 2 3 1 0 2.0% Type II 0 2 1 1 0 1.2% Type III 0 1 0 0 0 0.3% Type IV 0 0 0 0 0 0

Serious Device Events Descending Total Procedure 1 Month 6 Months 1 Year 2 year Serious 0.3% 4.6% 5.0% 2.0% 0 3.8% Endoleak 1 Type IA 1 1 1 0 0 0.9% Type IB 1 2 3 1 0 2.0% Type II 0 2 1 1 0 1.2% Type III 0 1 0 0 0 0.3% Type IV 0 0 0 0 0 0

Serious Device Events Descending Total Procedure 1 Month 6 Months 1 Year 2 year Serious 0.3% 4.6% 5.0% 2.0% 0 3.8% Endoleak 1 Type IA 1 1 1 0 0 0.9% Type IB 1 2 3 1 0 2.0% Type II 0 2 1 1 0 1.2% Type III 0 1 0 0 0 0.3% Type IV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Migration 2 0 1 0 0 0 0.3% Fracture 0 0 0 0 0 0 Compression 0 0 0 0 0 0

Outcomes Over Time Descending Subjects With Any Follow-Up and/or Event 1 Procedure 1 Month 6 Months 1 Year 2 Year Total 342 339 175 81 25 342

Outcomes Over Time Descending Subjects With Any Follow-Up and/or Event 1 Procedure 1 Month 6 Months 1 Year 2 Year Total 342 339 175 81 25 342 All Reinterventions 2 1.2% 3.8% 2.9% 2.5% 0 6.7% Conversion to Open Repair and/or Explant 0 1 0 0 0 1 Additional Graft 0 1 3 1 0 5 Other Procedure/Surgery 4 11 2 2 0 18 Device Related Reinterventions 0 7 4 2 0 13

Outcomes Over Time Descending Subjects With Any Procedure 1 Month 6 Months 1 Year 2 Year Total Follow-Up and/or Event 1 342 339 175 81 25 342 Mortality 0 10(2.9%) 12(6.9%) 4(4.9%) 1(4.0%) 27(7.9%)

Outcomes Over Time Descending Subjects With Any Procedure 1 Month 6 Months 1 Year 2 Year Total Follow-Up and/or Event 1 342 339 175 81 25 342 Mortality 0 10(2.9%) 12(6.9%) 4(4.9%) 1(4.0%) 27(7.9%) Stroke/TIA 2 0 2(0.6%) 0 0 0 2(0.6%) Paraplegia/ Paraparesis/ Spinal Cord Is. 1(0.3%) 1(0.3%) 1(0.6%) 1(1.2%) 0 4(1.2%) Rupture 0 1(0.3%) 1(0.6%) 0 0 2(0.6%)

Aortic Pathologies - Ascending: 19 pts

Aortic Pathologies - Ascending: 19 pts Type A complicated aortic dissection 7 Ascending aneurysm 4 Pseudoaneurysm 2 Ascending aneurysm rupture 1 Type A uncomplicated dissection 1 Ascending dissection rupture 1 Other 3

Aortic Pathologies - Ascending: 19 pts Type A complicated aortic dissection 7 Ascending aneurysm 4 Pseudoaneurysm 2 Ascending aneurysm rupture 1 Type A uncomplicated dissection 1 Ascending dissection rupture 1 Other 3 Mean age: 61 (range 27 83)

Aortic Pathologies - Ascending: 19 pts Almost all procedures were reported as surgical debranching Only 2 chimney procedures reported. Mean(std dev) hospital stay was 14.5(13.2) days, range 2, 51 days.

Aortic Pathologies - Ascending: 19 pts Outcome data at 1 month: 1 type IA endoleak No migrations, fractures or compressions. 2 (11%) deaths (MOF at POD 21 and lung infection POD 35 ) 2 reinterventions (of which 1 is device related) reported.

Aortic Pathologies - Ascending: 19 pts Outcome data at 1 month: 1 type IA endoleak No migrations, fractures or compressions. 2 (11%) deaths (MOF at POD 21 and lung infection POD 35 ) 2 reinterventions (of which 1 is device related) reported.

Aortic Pathologies - Ascending: 19 pts Outcome data at 1 month: 1 type IA endoleak No migrations, fractures or compressions. 2 (11%) deaths (MOF at POD 21 and lung infection POD 35 ) 2 reinterventions (of which 1 is device related) reported.

Conclusions The Gore GREAT Registry: about a real life data collection This represents a GREAT opportunity to check pts at the very long-term FU

Conclusions The Gore GREAT Registry: about a real life data collection This represents a GREAT opportunity to check pts at the very long-term FU Numerous variables and pts enrolled that permit to stratify different cohorts

Conclusions The Gore GREAT Registry: about a real life data collection This represents a GREAT opportunity to check pts at the very long-term FU Numerous variables and pts enrolled that permit to stratify different cohorts

Conclusions The Gore GREAT Registry: about a real life data collection Re-Coarctation with dissection Type A Diss with Arch Tear FET Ao-Pulm. Fistulae

The Gore GREAT Registry: Update about a real life data collection Santi Trimarchi, MD, PhD Vascular Surgeon Thoracic Aortic Research Center, Director IRCCS Policlinico San Donato University of Milan