Colorectal Cancer Screening: Colonoscopy, Potential and Pitfalls. Disclosures: None. CRC: still a major public health problem

Similar documents
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance

Benchmarking For Colonoscopy. Technology and Technique to Improve Adenoma Detection

Carol A. Burke, MD, FACG

Finding and Removing Difficult Polyps (safely)

Colorectal Cancer Screening: Cost-Effectiveness and Adverse events October, 2005

11/9/2015 OUTLINE. Quality Indicators for the Doctor Performing Screening Colonoscopy: What you should expect from your Endoscopist

Performance targets for lesion detection in surveillance

Circumstances in which colonoscopy misses cancer

2. Describe pros/cons of screening interventions (including colonoscopy, CT colography, fecal tests)

Colon Polyps: Detection, Inspection and Characteristics

The New Grade A: USPSTF Updated Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines, What does it all mean?

CRC Risk Factors. U.S. Adherence Rates Cancer Screening. Genetic Model of Colorectal Cancer. Epidemiology and Clinical Consequences of CRC

Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Clinical Update

Colorectal Cancer Screening. Daniel C. Chung, MD GI Unit and GI Cancer Genetics Service Massachusetts General Hospital

When is a programmed follow-up meaningful and how should it be done? Professor Alastair Watson University of Liverpool

Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative

WEO CRC SC Meeting. Barcelona, Spain October 23, 2015

FORTE: Five or Ten Year Colonoscopy for 1-2 Non-Advanced Adenomas

Retroflexion and prevention of right-sided colon cancer following colonoscopy: How I approach it

EXPERT WORKING GROUP Surveillance after neoplasia removal. Meeting Chicago, May 5th 2017 Chair: Rodrigo Jover Uri Ladabaum

Improving Your Adenoma Detection Rate

Improving you ADR. Robert Enns Colonoscopy Education Day October 2018

Latest Endoscopic Guidelines for FAP, HNPCC, IBD, and the General Population

Tips to Improve ADRs during Colonoscopy

Quality indicators for colonoscopy and colonoscopist. Mirjana Kalauz Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb

Screening for Colorectal Cancer in the Elderly. The Broad Perspective

Supplementary Appendix

The Natural History of Right-Sided Lesions

Early detection and screening for colorectal neoplasia

Updates in Colorectal Cancer Screening & Prevention

Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) has proven effectiveness. Colorectal Cancers Detected After Colonoscopy Frequently Result From Missed Lesions

removal of adenomatous polyps detects important effectively as follow-up colonoscopy after both constitute a low-risk Patients with 1 or 2

Page 1. Is the Risk This High? Dysplasia in the IBD Patient. Dysplasia in the Non IBD Patient. Increased Risk of CRC in Ulcerative Colitis

Interval Cancers: What is Next?

Variation in Detection of Adenomas and Polyps by Colonoscopy and Change Over Time With a Performance Improvement Program

Learning and Earning with Gateway Professional Education CME/CEU Webinar Series

Quality in Endoscopy: Can We Do Better?

Technology and Interventions to Improve ADR

Improving the Adenoma Detection Rate. ADR is a (the) priority quality indicator

Colorectal Cancer: Screening & Surveillance

Improving Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer: The Science of Screening. Colorectal Cancer (CRC)

Measure #425: Photodocumentation of Cecal Intubation National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Post-polypectomy follow-up after. removal of colorectal neoplasia

Natural history of adenomas by CT colonography Evelien Dekker Charlotte Tutein Nolthenius, Jaap Stoker

Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and the Risk of Interval Cancer

Citation for published version (APA): Wijkerslooth de Weerdesteyn, T. R. (2013). Population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy

Colon Cancer Screening Trends. U.S. Cancer Stastistics 2010

Colorectal cancer screening A puzzle of tests and strategies

How to Screen a patient with a Family History of Adenoma(s)

Improving Access to Endoscopy at Safety-Net Hospitals. Lukejohn W. Day MD Assistant Professor of Medicine

Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers in Lynch syndrome

Screening for Colon Cancer: How best and how effective? Richard Rosenberg, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Columbia University Medical Center

Page 1. Selected Controversies. Cancer Screening! Selected Controversies. Breast Cancer Screening. ! Using Best Evidence to Guide Practice!

Digestive Health Southwest Endoscopy 2016 Quality Report

Experience and challenges of implementing optical diagnosis into clinical practice UK and European Perspective

Colorectal Neoplasia. Dr. Smita Devani MBChB, MRCP. Consultant Physician and Gastroenterologist Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi

COLON CANCER SCREENING: AN UPDATE

Measure #425: Photodocumentation of Cecal Intubation National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Title Description Type / Priority

Kenneth D. Chi, MD Medical Director, GI Lab Advocate Lutheran General Hospital Center for Digestive Health May 7, 2016

Number of polyps detected is a useful indicator of quality of clinical colonoscopy

National Colonoscopy Study (NCS) Screening Colonoscopy versus Annual Fecal Occult Blood Test NCT

Variable Endoscopist performance in proximal and distal adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a retrospective cohort study

Alberta Colorectal Cancer Screening Program (ACRCSP) Post Polypectomy Surveillance Guidelines

Hamideh Salimzadeh, PhD Assistant Professor, Digestive Diseases Research Center,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Shariati Hospital, North

The Canadian Cancer Society estimates that in

Prof Rupert Leong, Director of Endoscopy, Head of IBD Professor of Medicine UNSW, University of Sydney, Concord Hospital Australia IBDSydney

Optimal Colonoscopy Surveillance Interval after Polypectomy

Cancer Screening 2009: New Tests, New Choices

Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Screening and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

Colonoscopy Quality Data 2017

Page 1. Cancer Screening for Women I have no conflicts of interest. Overview. Breast, Colon, and Lung Cancer. Jeffrey A.

Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

Colon Cancer Screening Past, Present & Future

With CRC Screening Rates on the Rise, Quality Control Becomes Center of Attention

August 21, National Quality Forum th St, NW Suite 800 Washington, D.C Re: Colonoscopy Quality Index (NQF# C 2056)

Colonoscopy Quality Data

SCREENING FOR BOWEL CANCER USING FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY REVIEW APPRAISAL CRITERIA FOR THE UK NATIONAL SCREENING COMMITTEE

Measure #343: Screening Colonoscopy Adenoma Detection Rate National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clincal Care

Selected Controversies. Cancer Screening. Breast Cancer Screening. Selected Controversies. Page 1. Using Best Evidence to Guide Practice

The Importance of Complete Colonoscopy and Exploration of the Cecal Region

Douglas K. Rex, MD Indiana University Hospital Indianapolis, IN

Monitoring of colonoscopy quality indicators in an academic endoscopy facility reveals adherence to international recommendations

Missed Lesions at Endoscopy. Dr Russell Walmsley, MD, FRCP, FRACP Gastroenterologist WDHB Chair Endoscopy Guidance Group for New Zealand

Supporting Information 2. ESGE QIC Lower GI Delphi voting process: Round 1 Working Group chair: Michal F. Kaminski, Poland

CT Colonography: Clinical case review. Beth G. McFarland, MD, FACR SSM St. Joseph, St. Charles, MO

Quality Indicators in Colonoscopy

Screening for colorectal cancer. Stuart Taylor Consultant Radiologist University College Hospital

Multicenter, randomized, tandem evaluation of EndoRings colonoscopy results of the CLEVER study

Colonoscopy Quality Assessment

How to start a screening Program? WEO Colorectal Cancer Screening Committee Meeting Brasilia Nov R. Sáenz, FACG,FASGE

Research Article Development of Polyps and Cancer in Patients with a Negative Colonoscopy: A Follow-Up Study of More Than 20 Years

Quality in Endoscopy and Cost Effective Practice

An Updated Approach to Colon Cancer Screening and Prevention

Is the level of cleanliness using segmental Boston bowel preparation scale associated with a higher adenoma detection rate?

Colorectal Cancer Screening

2015 Winter School 대장종양성병변의진단과치료. Dong Kyung Chang. Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine Samsung Medical Center

There is No One Best CRC Screening Test: The Proof and the Benefits of Getting FIT

Screening & Surveillance Guidelines

Difficult Polypectomy 2015 Tool of the Trade

Transcription:

Colorectal Cancer Screening: Colonoscopy, Potential and Pitfalls Disclosures: None Jonathan P. Terdiman, M.D. Professor of Clinical Medicine University of California, San Francisco CRC: still a major public health problem Cumulative Mortality from Colorectal Cancer in the General Population, as Compared with the Adenoma and Nonadenoma Cohorts. 1 million cases per year worldwide and ½ million deaths USA 4 th most common cancer ~ 150, 000 cases per year 2 nd most common cause of cancer death ~ 50, 000/yr Lifetime risk is 3-6% Zauber AG et al. N Engl J Med 2012;366:687-696.

Screening Options FOBT q year Flexible sigmoidoscopy q 5 yrs FOBT and Flexible sigmoidoscopy Colonoscopy q 10 years CT colonography q 5 years Screening Colonoscopy Compelling indirect evidence that this is the best test FOBT studies Flex Sig Studies Polypectomy Studies Cohort studies Screening Colonoscopy: VA Cooperative Study (Lieberman et al. NEJM, 2000) Advanced adenoma in 7.9% Cancer in 1.0% 73% with Stage I or II disease 20% with Stage III and 6% with Stage IV 44% of patients with advanced neoplasia would have been missed by flex sig first screen 30% missed by sig + FOBT Colonoscopy in the real world: The Polyp Prevention Trials 9 studies with > 20, 000 years of patient follow-up Incidence of CRC = 1.7-2.4/1, 000 person-years Incidence is equivalent to general population and 4 x that in National Polyp Study!!! Gastroenterology 2005;129:34-41 Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:385-91

Impact of colonoscopy on CRC death Baxter NN. Ann Int Med, 2009 10, 292 CRC deaths and 51, 940 controls among 1.2 million Canadians, 1996-2001 OR for death with colonoscopy = 0.69 Left sided cancers, OR = 0.33 Right sided cancer, OR = 0.99 Incomplete Exam Gastro, 2007 Pop-based study in Canada > 300, 000 exams, 13% incomplete Risk Factors Older age Women Prior operation Test in MD office Missed Cancers Gastro, 2007 AN: Left vs. Right Polyps Gupta S, et al. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2012; 10:1395-1401. Cancers diagnosed within 3 yrs of colonoscopy Risk Factors Older age Diverticular disease Right sided cancer Internist/Family MD doing the test Test in a MD office

Flat & Depressed Polyps Soetikno R, Jama 2008 1819 exams, use of dye spray to confirm Prevalence = 9.4% (95% CI, 8.1-10.8) OR for cancer = 9.8 Incomplete Polyp Resection Pohl H, Gastroenterology 2012 Prospective study of 1427 patients who underwent colonoscopy 10% inadequately resected Wide range by MD (6.5-23%) Risk Factors Large size: 17% for > 10 mm Serrated polyps: 31% Less than 20 polypectomies/year Advanced Polypectomy Holt BA, Clin Gastro Hepatol, 2012 Biological Variability 51 interval cancers within 5 years of colonoscopy MSI in 30.4% of interval cancers versus 10.3% of others (p = 0.003) Interval cancers 3.7 x more likely to be MSI 27% of interval cancers at previous polypectomy segment Interval cancers 3 times more likely to be R sided Farrar WD Gastro, 2006 Sawhney MS Clin Gastro Hepatol, 2006

Doing colonoscopy well Barclay RL NEJM, 2007 Mean adenoma detection rate according to colonoscopic withdrawal times 12 endoscopists doing over 2000 screening exams Range of adenoma detection 9.4% to 32.7% Range of scope withdrawal times 3.1 to 16.8 minutes Detection rate < versus > 6 minutes 11.8% versus 28.3% for any adenoma (p < 0.001) 2.6% versus 6.4% for advanced adenoma (p = 0.005) Cumulative Hazard Rates for Interval Colorectal Cancer, According to the Endoscopist's Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR). Kaminski MF et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1795-1803. Benchmarks for GOOD Colonoscopy Adenoma Detection Rate > 25% men, 15% women PLCO data: 2.4 fold risk of interval cancer in those with lowest quartile of ADR vs. highest Documentation of Prep 100% Cecal Intubation >/= 95% Recent population-based study in Canada rate was only 87% Withdrawal Times >/= 6 minutes?

Colonoscopy done well Brenner, Ann Int Med, 2011 Population-based case-control study in Germany 1688 CRC cases and 1932 controls Colonoscopy within 10 years 77% risk reduction for CRC 84% for left-sided cancer 66% for right-sided