7th International Congress of the Spanish Society of Obesity Surgery. Valladolid Spain May, 2004.

Similar documents
DISCLOSURES. Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) As An Option For Failed Gastric Bypass Procedure In Obese Patients

ADVANCE AT YOUR OWN PACE

A Bariatric Patient in my Waiting Room: Choosing the Right Patient for the Right Operation: Bariatric Surgery Indications

Bariatric Surgery. The Oregon Bariatric Center Surgical Team

Adipocytes, Obesity, Bariatric Surgery and its Complications

Disclosures. Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery & Future Therapies. Objectives

Weight Loss Surgery. Outline 3/30/12. What Every GI Nurse Needs to Know. Define Morbid Obesity & its Medical Consequences. Treatments for Obesity

Bariatric Surgery: How complex is this? Pradeep Pallati, MD, FACS, FASMBS

Lecture Goals. Body Mass Index. Obesity Definitions. Bariatric Surgery What the PCP Needs to Know 11/17/2009. Indications for bariatric Surgeries

Gastric bypass vs. Sleeve gastrectomy

Overview. Stanley J. Rogers, MD, FACS Associate Clinical Professor of Surgery University of California San Francisco

Benefits of Bariatric Surgery

ANZMOSS 2018 Melbourne Bariatric Surgery Masterclass

Form 1: Demographics

11/11/2011. Bariatric Surgery for Sleep Apnea. Case Presentation: Rachelle. Case Presentation: Rachelle. Case Presentation: Rachelle

Commonly Performed Bariatric Procedures in Singapore. Lin Jinlin Associate Consultant General, Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery Changi General Hospital

Obesity and Bariatric Surgery Michel M. Murr, MD, FACS

WEIGHT LOSS SURGERY A Primer on Current Options and Outcomes. Caitlin A. Halbert DO, MS, FACS, FASMBS April 5, 2018

Surgical Therapy for Morbid Obesity. Janeen Jordan, PGY 5 Surgical Grand Rounds April 7, 2008

Not over when the surgery is done: surgical complications of obesity

The Surgical Management of Obesity

Clinical Study Redo Surgery after Failed Open VBG: Laparoscopic Minigastric Bypass versus Laparoscopic Roux en Y Gastric Bypass Which Is Better?

Morbid Obesity A Curable Disease?

JAMA February 10, 2010 Laparoscopic Adjustable Banding in Severely Obese Adolescents: A Randomized Trial

Policy Specific Section: April 14, 1970 June 28, 2013

INFORMED CONSENT FOR LAPAROSCOPIC ADJUSTABLE GASTRIC BAND. Please read this form carefully and ask about anything you may not understand.

Imaging findings in complications of bariatric surgery.

Bariatric surgery. KHALAJ A.R. M.D Obesity Clinic Mostafa Khomini Hospital Shahed University Tehran

Technique. Matthew Bettendorf, MD Essentia Health Duluth Clinic. Laparoscopic approach One 12mm port, Four 5mm ports

Bariatric Surgery. Options & Outcomes

SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF OBESITY. Anne Lidor, MD, MPH Professor of Surgery Chief, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery

Here are some types of gastric bypass surgery:

Removal of a lap band and revision to an alternative bariatric procedure in one procedure.

Laparoscopic conversion of Gastric Banding into Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Program Information Session

Demographics. MBSAQIP Case Number: *ACS NSQIP Case Number: *LMRN: *DOB: / / *Gender: Male Female

Revision For Weight Regain

Considering Bariatric Surgery?

The case for reductive surgery: a more efficient and cost-effective option

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine (January 2019) Vol. 74 (3), Page

Considering Bariatric Surgery? Learn about minimally invasive da Vinci Surgery

Banded Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. International, multi centre, open, prospective, randomized study

OBESITY AND WEIGHT LOSS SURGERY FOR THE PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIAN

Update on Bariatric Surgery. Learning Objectives: At the end of this lecture you should be able to: Currently Available Options

Obesity and Weight Loss Surgery for the Primary Care Physician

Bariatric Surgery: The Primary Care Approach

Marc Bessler, M.D.*, Amna Daud, M.D., M.P.H., Teresa Kim, M.D., Mary DiGiorgi, M.P.H.

6/23/2011. Bariatric Surgery: What the Primary Care Provider Should Know. Case Presentation: Rachelle

Bariatric Surgery as an Ambulatory Procedure

Disclosure. consultant to Ethicon Endosurgery. case mix disclosure. LRYGB sleeve BPD revisions OAGB ( minibp ), SADI: 0% 19% 55% 23%

Long Term Follow-up. 6 Month 1 Year Annual enter year #: What is the assessment date: / / Unknown. Is the patient alive? Yes No

(1) Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, The Alfred Hospital (2) Monash University Centre for Obesity Research and Education (CORE)

Chapter 4 Section 13.2

Long term laparoscopic Sleeve gastrectomy outcomes

Bariatric Surgery: A Cost-effective Treatment of Obesity?

Chapter 4 Section 13.2

Complications After Bariatric Surgery. Kunoor Jain-Spangler, MD

Jordan Garrison Jr. MD, FACS, FASMBS

Complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Background LGBP. Eirik Hornes Halvorsen, MD, PhD Oslo

Viriato Fiallo, MD Ursula McMillian, MD

Sleeve Gastrectomy: Harmful. John C. Eun, PGY-5 General Surgery Grand Rounds University of Colorado Denver 11/22/10

Surgical management of super super obese patients: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy

Bariatric Surgery: Indications and Ethical Concerns

Medical Policy. MP Bariatric Surgery. BCBSA Ref. Policy: Last Review: 02/26/2018 Effective Date: 02/26/2018 Section: Surgery

Adjustable Gastric Band Surgery: Review of Current Practice. Dr. Chris Cobourn The Surgical Weight Loss Centre Mississauga, Ontario Canada

Choice Critria in Bariatric Surgery. Giovanni Camerini

Clinical Study Endoscopic Revision (StomaphyX) versus Formal Surgical Revision (Gastric Bypass) for Failed Vertical Band Gastroplasty

BARIATRIC SURGERY. Weight Loss Surgery. A variety of surgical procedures to reduce weight performed on people who have obesity. Therapy Male & Female

OBESITY/OVERWEIGHT. Fastest spreading disaster of the century- Bariatric Surgical treatment. By Dr. Vladimir Shchukin Consultant General Surgeon

Welche Operation für welchen Patienten: Sleeve, Bypass oder?

Bariatric Care Center Outcomes Report

Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Technique, Results, and Long-Term Follow-Up in 1200 Patients

Surgical Management of Obesity. David A. Edelman, MD, MSHPEd, FACS Associate Professor of Surgery

SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF MORBID OBESITY

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes

Surgical Treatment of Obesity. 1. Understand who is an appropriate candidate for referral for surgical weight loss.

Bariatric Surgery Risk Education Packet Walter J. Chlysta MD, FACS

Imaging Following Mini-Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy: what every radiologists need to know

Current Trends in Bariatric Surgery

Diagnosis and management of early gastric band slip after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

Disclosures. Obesity and Its Challenges: Outline. Outline 5/2/2013. Lan Vu, MD Division of Pediatric Surgery Department of Surgery

3 Things To Know About Obesity Surgery

OBESITY MANAGEMENT: DIET/EXERCISE, NEW DRUGS AND/OR SURGERY?

Access to Proven Therapies

Supplementary Online Content

General Surgery Service

American College of Physicians October 21, 2017 Oklahoma Chapter Scientific Meeting. Bariatric Surgery

Chronic abdominal pain after RYGB A management guide

SURGICAL TREATMENT FOR OBESITY: WHAT S THE BEST OPTION? Natan Zundel, MD, FACS, FASMBS

Goals 1/9/2018. Obesity over the last decade Surgery has become a safer management strategy Surgical options for management

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band The Safest, Effective Procedure for Treating Obesity and Obesity Related Disease

Gastric bypass is safe and effective for the super-super-obese patient

Influence of the Actual Diameter of the Gastric Pouch Outlet in Weight Loss After Silicon Ring Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: An Endoscopic Study

Corporate Medical Policy. Bariatric (Surgery for Morbid Obesity)

Original Policy Date

Ahmed Abdelwahab Nafady [5] Affiliation(s) IJSER. professor of general surgery, Beni-Suef University.

Weight Loss Surgery Program

Reoperation Bariatric Surgery:

Managing Complications of Bariatric Surgery. Objectives

When do we need ICU after bariatric surgery?

Transcription:

7th International Congress of the Spanish Society of Obesity Surgery. Valladolid Spain May, 2004.

DIMINISHING POSTOPERATIVE RISKS OF GASTRIC BYPASS Stenosis Stenosis Leak Leak Bleeding Bleeding Stenosis Stenosis Leak Leak Bleeding Bleeding Chronic Chronic Marginal Marginal Ulcer Ulcer Severe Severe Dumping. Dumping. Obstruction Stenosis Leak Bleeding Volvulus Intussuception Internal Hernia Obstruction?? Failure in Weight Loss or Weight Regain!!! Two Anastomosis GB 12 Possible Risk Factors (OAGB) One Anastomosis GB 4 Possible Risk Factors.

LAPAROSCOPIC ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS ROBOTIC - IDRIVE ULTRA POWERED STAPLING SYSTEM (OAGB)

LAPAROSCOPIC ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS ROBOTIC - IDRIVE ULTRA POWERED STAPLING SYSTEM (OAGB) KEY STEPS OF THE PROCEDURE 1. Bilio Pancreatic Limb: between 250 to 350 cm average. 2. Section of Greater Omentum: in supermorbid and central obesity. 3. Hiss Angle, Fat and G E membrane Totally Dissected. 4. Gastric Pouch: length: ~ 15cm, capacity: ~ 30 cc. (calibrated with a 36 French tube). Total dissection of fat in the posterior gastric wall. 5. Anti reflux Mechanism : afferent loop suspended at least10 cm on the gastric pouch. 6. Gastro Ileal Anastomosis Side to Side: ~ 2.5 cm. width.

LAPAROSCOPIC ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS ROBOTIC - IDRIVE ULTRA POWERED STAPLING SYSTEM (OAGB) Post-operative X-Ray control Radiologic control at 5 years

LAPAROSCOPIC ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS: 13YEAR EXPERIENCE IN 2.600 PATIENTS RESULTS: Patient Characteristics (July 2002 to February 2015) Age 43 (12 74) Female Gender Male 1599 (61.5%) 1001 (38.5%) BMI 46 (31 86) EBW (kg) 65 (28 220)

LAPAROSCOPIC ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS: 13YEAR EXPERIENCE IN 2.600 PATIENTS RESULTS: Patient Characteristics (July 2002 to February 2015) Primary Surgery Other Previous Open Surgery 1495 (57.5%) 627 (24.12%) Other Associated Procedures 408 (15.69 %) Previous Bariatric Procedures 70 (2.69%)

LAPAROSCOPIC ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS: 13YEAR EXPERIENCE IN 2.600 PATIENTS Uncomplicated Patients 2.566 (99%) Length of Hospital Stay Patients with Major Complications 34 (1%) 1 day (15 120 h.) 9 days (4 32 d.)

LAPAROSCOPIC ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS: 13YEAR EXPERIENCE IN 2.600 PATIENTS Surgical Early Major Complications Bleeding 2 (0.08 %) Intraoperative Complications (resolved by Open Surgery) 4 (0.2%) Gastro esophageal Perforation 1 (0.04 %) Incorrect Gastric Transection 1 (0.04 %) Immediate Postoperative Complications (resolved by Open Surgery) 6 (0.2%) Immediate Postoperative Complications (resolved by Lap. Surgery) TOTAL 16 (0.8%) Leaks 2 (0.08 %) Intestinal Obstruction 1 (0.04 %) Partial Necrosis of Excluded Stomach Bleeding 1 (0.04 %) 2 (0.08%) Bleeding 10 (0.4%) Leaks 2 (0.08 %) Intestinal Obstruction 3 (0.11 %) Acute Gastric Distension 1 (0.04 26 (1%)%)

LAPAROSCOPIC ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS: 13YEAR EXPERIENCE IN 2.600 PATIENTS Non Surgical Early Major Complications Complications Treated Conservatively Mortality Mortality Leaks 10 (0.4 %) Massive Pulmonary Embolism 1 (0.04 %) Acute Pancreatitis 1 (0.04 %) Nosocomial Pneumonia (Post reintervention) 1 (0.04 %) Infected Hematoma 1 (0.04 %) DIC Post Band reversion 1 (0.04 %) Total 12 (0.5%) Total 3 (0.11%)

LAPAROSCOPIC ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS: 13YEAR EXPERIENCE IN 2.600 PATIENTS Late Complications Pneumatic Dilatation Gastro intestinal stenosis 9 (0.3%) Prosthesis 7 (0.3%) 2 (0.08%) Anastomotic Ulcer Medical Treatment 13 (0.5%) Malnutrition Medical treatment 14 (0.5%) Medical treatment 3 (0.1%) B1 B6 Vitamin (severe deficit) Revisional surgery TOTAL None 0 (0%) 39 (1.5 %)

LAPAROSCOPIC ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS: 13YEAR EXPERIENCE IN 2.600 PATIENTS Endoscopic Studies at 5 Year Follow Up Postop. UGI endoscopic (control) studies planned for all patients completing 5 year f/u 1.750 patients completed at least 5 Year f/u 602 (34%) underwent UGI endoscopic studies NO significant acute or chronic lesions found NO erosive esophagitis or severe alkaline reflux Findings: Stomal ulcer: 4 (0.7%) Mild / Moderate pouch gastritis: 41 (7%) H. Pylori +: 10 (1.7%)

LAPAROSCOPIC ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS: 13YEAR EXPERIENCE IN 2.600 PATIENTS Weight Loss Percent of mean (and range) EWL at: 1 year 84% (55 112%) 2 year 88% (58 115%) 3 year 81% (55 103%) 4 year 79% (51 102%) 5 year 77% (48 100%) 10 year 70% (45 98%) 12 year 69% (43 98%)

LAPAROSCOPIC ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS: 13YEAR EXPERIENCE IN 2.600 PATIENTS Severe Comorbidities Resolution Index at Two years at Ten years Dyslipidemia 100% 86% Type II Diabetes 93% 90% Arterial Hypertension 98% 87% Sleep apnea 100% 99%

(Since January 2010) BMI Distribution TOTAL OPERATIONS 717 OAGB TOTAL OPERATIONS 11455 RYGB TOTAL OPERATIONS 2447 TOTAL OPERATIONS 7862 GB SG

(Since January 2010) Co morbidities Prevalence TOTAL OPERATIONS 717 OAGB TOTAL OPERATIONS 11455 RYGB TOTAL OPERATIONS 2447 TOTAL OPERATIONS 7862 GB SG

(Since January 2010) Previous Co morbidities 84,14 % 77,41 % 51,38 % 49,94 % 36,20 % 32,10 % 30,17 % 19,66 % 16,90 % 14,48 % 24,29 % 6,05 % TOTAL OPERATIONS 717 TOTAL OPERATIONS 11455 OAGB RYGB

(Since January 2010) Previous Co morbidities 39,90 % 35,23 % 24,11 % 16,45 % 2,66 % 8,51 % 11,98 % TOTAL OPERATIONS 2447 GB 16,63 % 23,74 % 28,32 % 7,29 % TOTAL OPERATIONS 7862 SG 34,29 %

(Since January 2010) Hospital Stay TOTAL OPERATIONS 717 OAGB TOTAL OPERATIONS 11455 RYGB TOTAL OPERATIONS 2447 TOTAL OPERATIONS 7862 GB SG

(Since January 2010) Intra operative Complications % % % Gastrointestin Injury Bleeding al perforation Liver Failure vascular % % Injury Other splenic % Deaths TOTAL OPERATIONS 717 OAGB TOTAL OPERATIONS 2447 GB TOTAL OPERATIONS 11455 RYGB TOTAL OPERATIONS 7862 SG

g G pl en ic er at a Bl ion l ee di ng om Le in ak al W Ab ou sc nd es W s I n ou f ec nd tio De n hi sc en An ce as to Ob Int m st es ot ru t i Ga ic ct na st St io l ric ric n /S tu to re m al Ul ce Li r ve Li r ve Fa rf ilu a r Voilu e m re iti ng Ot he r In tr aab d co m iti n Ot he r Vo m G pl en ic er a a Bl tio l In ee n tr di ang Ab do Le m in ak al W A ou nd bsc W es ou s nd Infe c De tio In te n hi st sc in e nc al An e Ob as st to ru m ct ot io n ic Ga St st ric ri c tu /S re to m al Ul ce r co m (Since January 2010) Post operative Complications % % 0,17 % % % % % % % % % TOTAL OPERATIONS 717 TOTAL OPERATIONS 11455 OAGB RYGB %

GB TOTAL OPERATIONS 7862 SG Ot he r co m Ge pl n ic er at a Bl ion l In e tr ed ain Ab g do m L in ea al k A W bs ou ce nd ss W ou In fe nd ct In De io te n st hi in sc al en Ob An ce as st ru to ct m io ot Ga n i c st S ric tr ic /S tu to re m al Ul ce Li ve r rf ai lu re Vo m iti ng TOTAL OPERATIONS 2447 Ot he r G pl en ic er a a Bl tion l In e tr ed ain Ab g do m L ea in al k Ab W ou sc es nd W s ou In nd fe In c tio D te eh st n is in ce al nc An O bs e as t ru to m ct io ot Ga n ic st S ric tr ic /S tu to re m al Ul Li ve cer rf ai lu re Vo m iti ng co m (Since January 2010) Post operative Complications

(Since January 2010) Post operative Complications

(Since January 2010) General Complications 0.56% TOTAL OPERATIONS 717 OAGB 4.32% TOTAL OPERATIONS 11455 RYGB 4.02% 7.23% TOTAL OPERATIONS 2447 TOTAL OPERATIONS 7862 GB SG

(Since January 2010) General Complications: Esophageal 0.63% 0% TOTAL OPERATIONS 717 TOTAL OPERATIONS 11455 RYGB OAGB 1.4% 4% TOTAL OPERATIONS 2447 TOTAL OPERATIONS 7862 GB SG

(Since January 2010) General Complications: Gastric 0.28% TOTAL OPERATIONS 717 OAGB 0.17% 1.55% TOTAL OPERATIONS 11455 RYGB 0.28% TOTAL OPERATIONS 2447 TOTAL OPERATIONS 7862 GB SG

(Since January 2010) General Complications: Metabolic 0.49% 0.28% TOTAL OPERATIONS 717 OAGB TOTAL OPERATIONS 11455 RYGB 0.04% 1.21% TOTAL OPERATIONS 2447 TOTAL OPERATIONS 7862 GB SG

(Since January 2010) General Complications: Hepatobillary 1.05% 0% TOTAL OPERATIONS 717 TOTAL OPERATIONS 11455 OAGB RYGB 0.21% 1.66% TOTAL OPERATIONS 2447 TOTAL OPERATIONS 7862 GB SG

(Since January 2010) General Complications: Non specific 0.56% 0% TOTAL OPERATIONS 717 OAGB 0.25% TOTAL OPERATIONS 11455 RYGB 0.16% TOTAL OPERATIONS 2447 TOTAL OPERATIONS 7862 GB SG

(Since January 2010) % EWL at 36 Months TOTAL OPERATIONS 717 OAGB TOTAL OPERATIONS 11455 RYGB

(Since January 2010) % EWL at 36 Months TOTAL OPERATIONS 2447 GB TOTAL OPERATIONS 7862 SG

Evolution of % EWL

Evolution of % EBMIL

LAPAROSCOPIC ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS: 13-YEAR EXPERIENCE IN 2.600 PATIENTS CONCLUSIONS 1.The OAGB (BAGUA) technique in our experience does not reduce the complexity of the surgical procedure, but significantly reduces operative time and lenght of hospital stay compared to other complex techniques; it also substantially decreases both early and late complication rates.

LAPAROSCOPIC ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS: 13-YEAR EXPERIENCE IN 2.600 PATIENTS CONCLUSIONS 2.Excellent results in our long term follow up in regards to EWL, EBMIL, resolution of co morbidities and quality of life make OAGB a safe and effective technique, and a powerful alternative for the treatment of morbid and super morbid obesity after a 13 year experience.

CENTER OF EXCELLENCE FOR THE STUDY AND OBESITY SURGERY TREATMENT