External Quality Assessment of Breast Marker Analysis. NordiQC data

Similar documents
Optimization of antibodies, selection, protocols and controls Breast tumours

Breast cancer: Antibody selection, protocol optimzation controls and EQA

NordiQC External Quality Assurance in Immunohistochemistry

Assessment Run B HER-2 IHC. HER-2/chr17 ratio**

NordiQC - update

Assessment Run B HER2 IHC

Assessment Run B HER2 IHC

The impact of proficiency testing on lab immunoassays

Quality Assurance in Immunohistochemistry: Experiences from NordiQC

10 years of NordiQC Why are 30% of labs still getting it wrong?

HER2 ISH (BRISH or FISH)

Assessment Run C1 2017

Estrogen receptor (ER)

SMH (Myosin, smooth muscle heavy chain)

Estrogen receptor (ER)

Assessment Run C3 2018

Breast cancer: IHC classification. Mogens Vyberg Professor of Clinical Pathology Director of NordiQC Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

Assessment Run B HER-2

Estrogen receptor (ER)

Lung Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (lu-alk)

Immunohistochemical principles The technical test approach. Pre-analytical parametres

Cytokeratin 19 (CK19)

Assessment Run GATA3

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)

Assessment Run NKX3.1 (NKX3.1)

Epithelial cell-cell adhesion molecule (Ep-CAM)

Assessment Run

Thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF1) Assessment run

Image analysis in IHC overview, considerations and applications

Sal-like protein 4 (SALL4)

Immunohistochemistry. Potential and challenges To be or not to be

Assessment Run CK19

Breast cancer diagnostic solutions Deliver diagnostic confidence

The unkown primary tumour: IHC Classification, antibody selection, protocol optimization, controls and EQA (part I)

Product Introduction. Product Codes: HCL029, HCL030 and HCL031. Issue

Nordic Immunohistochemical Quality Control

The unknown primary tumour: IHC classification part I, the primary panel - Antibody selection, protocol optimization, controls and EQA

IHC Stainer platforms. Overview, pros and cons

What kind of material should we use for ICC in our daily routine. Torill Sauer Department of Pathology, Akershus University Hospital

COMPUTER-AIDED HER-2/neu EVALUATION IN EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE (EQA) OF BREAST CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMME

Quality assurance and quality control in pathology in breast disease centers

External Quality Assessment of melanocytic marker analyses NordiQC experience

Product Introduction

07/06/2013. Commentary. The best way to achieve optimal treatment of today s patients is to ensure the availability of

Immunohistochemical classification of lung carcinomas and mesotheliomas. Prof. Mogens Vyberg NordiQC Institute of Pathology Aalborg, Denmark

Welcome! HER2 TESTING DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY 4/11/2016

Diagnostic IHC in lung and pleura pathology

Quality Control/Quality Assurance in Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry

Dr. dr. Primariadewi R, SpPA(K)

Instant Quality FISH. The name says it all.

Immunohistochemical classification of the unknown primary tumour (UPT) Part I. Prof. Mogens Vyberg NordiQC Institute of Pathology Aalborg, Denmark

Workflow. Connecting the Pieces For Total Patient Care

# Best Practices for IHC Detection and Interpretation of ER, PR, and HER2 Protein Overexpression in Breast Cancer

Immunohistochemical classification of breast tumours

The following slides were presented at the TIGA Workshop, and are enclosed in the PP show format (*.pps) in order to include all presented details.

Classification of the unknown primary tumour: the primary IHC panel

EQA for PD-L1 IHC staining: is it a conundrum? Keith Miller

A National Quality Assurance program for breast immunohistochemistry: an Italian perspective

The unkown primary tumour: IHC Classification, antibody selection, protocol optimization, controls and EQA (part II)

HER2 CISH pharmdx TM Kit Interpretation Guide Breast Cancer

HistoCyte Laboratories Ltd

FAQs for UK Pathology Departments

Protocols for Zytomed Systems antibodies on fully automated IHC staining systems date of issue: September 20, 2012

HSL-Advanced Diagnostics 2018 / 19 Test & Service List

HER2/neu Evaluation of Breast Cancer in 2019

Immunocytochemistry. Run 119/48. Improving Immunocytochemistry for Over 25 Years Results - Summary Graphs - Pass Rates Best Methods - Selected Images

Quality Assurance and Quality Control in the Pathology Dept.

PD-L1 Analyte Control DR

Milestones in Her 2 Testing

Assessment performed on Friday, September 18, 2015, at Vancouver General Hospital

MEDICAL POLICY. Proprietary Information of YourCare Health Plan

HER2 status assessment in breast cancer. Marc van de Vijver Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Amsterdam

HER2 FISH pharmdx TM Interpretation Guide - Breast Cancer

Kristen E. Muller, DO, Jonathan D. Marotti, MD, Vincent A. Memoli, MD, Wendy A. Wells, MD, and Laura J. Tafe, MD

Optimal algorithm for HER2 testing

Agilent companion diagnostics for cancer immunotherapy

Aspects of quality in breast pathology. Andrew Lee Nottingham University Hospitals

Companion & Complementary Diagnostics: Clinical and Regulatory Perspectives

Results you can trust

Assessment performed on Tuesday, July 29, 2014, at Lions Gate Hospital, North Vancouver

In Situ Hybridization: Market Strategies and Forecasts, US,

Assessment of Breast Cancer with Borderline HER2 Status Using MIP Microarray

Breast cancer: Molecular STAGING classification and testing. Korourian A : AP,CP ; MD,PHD(Molecular medicine)

System-wide Ownership Group: Allina Health Breast Program Committee. Hospital Division Quality Council: August 2018

Guideline. Associated Documents ASCO CAP 2018 GUIDELINES and SUPPLEMENTS -

Breast Cancer Diversity Various Disease Subtypes Clinical Diversity

Reviewer's report. Version: 1 Date: 24 May Reviewer: Cathy Moelans. Reviewer's report:

Single and Multiplex Immunohistochemistry

Three Hours Thirty Minutes

Version 2 of these Guidelines were drafted in response to published updated ASCO/CAP HER2 test Guideline Recommendations-

Quality Indicators - Anatomic Pathology- HSC/STC Jul-Sep 2 nd Qtr. Apr-Jun 1 st Qtr

Quantitative Image Analysis of HER2 Immunohistochemistry for Breast Cancer

Applications of IHC. Determination of the primary site in metastatic tumors of unknown origin

Immunohistochemistry on Fluid Specimens: Technical Considerations

Overview of Biomarker Development for Immune PD-1/L1 Checkpoint Blockade

Update on the Practical Management of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Update on the Practical Management of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 January 1.

IDH1 R132H/ATRX Immunohistochemical validation

Transcription:

External Quality Assessment of Breast Marker Analysis NordiQC data Søren Nielsen Scheme Manager NordiQC Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark Aalborg 12.06 2015

Markers assessed in NordiQC Predictive markers Diagnostic markers Estrogen receptor Progesteron receptor HER2 IHC HER2 ISH (Ki67) GATA3 GCDFP15 Mammaglobin CK high mol. weight. Myosin heavy chain p63

350 300 250 200 150 100 50 2000 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 App. 600 laboratories in total > 60 countries 0 1 4 7 10 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 Generel Breast HER-2 ISH

Focus: Appropriate technical quality; signal-to-noise, morphology etc Appropriate analytical sensitivity and specificity indicated by concordance of ER status in the included tumours to reference

Uterine cervix Tonsil Breast carc. high Breast carc. low Breast carc. negative

Estrogen receptor; 14 runs - 2.267 slides assessed / protocols analyzed Sufficient Optimal 49% (n=1.111 slides) Good 29% (n=665 slides) Insufficient Borderline 13% (n=286 slides) Poor 9% (n=205 slides) 85% Weak / False negative 10% False positive 5% Poor signal/noise, imp. morph., etc

2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

Estrogen receptor; Pass rate influenced by participation 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 New participants Old participants Run 10, 2004 57% (n=61) 71% (n=134) Run B15, 2010 70% (n=54) 86% (n=208) Run B19, 2015 51% (n=86) 73% (n=259)

Estrogen receptor; Pass rate influenced by protocol harmonization 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2003 B8 2013 B15 Titre range / average titre 1:10-1.000 / 1:125 1:10-400 / 1:90 HIER by in-house buffer 88% 6% HIER by high ph 70% 94% Polymer/multimer kit 56% 93% Fully automated system 6% 59%

2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

HIER alk. ph 2- & 3-step kits Carefully calib. Uterine cervix all epithelial cells

Estrogen receptor; 85% Weak / False negative 10% False positive 5% Impaired morphology, etc Suf. Ins. Too low titre (SP1, EP1) Insufficient HIER (all clones) Clone 1D5 Clone 6F11 by HIER at high ph, 3-step pol. (not observed on VMS) Clone 1D5 at high titre, Biotin-based kits, HIER in pressure cooker

Focus: Appropriate technical quality; signal-to-noise, morphology etc Appropriate analytical sensitivity and specificity indicated by concordance of PR status in the included tumours to reference

Uterine cervix Breast carc. high Breast carc. low Breast carc. negative

Progesterone receptor; 8 runs - 1.357 slides assessed / protocols analyzed Sufficient Optimal 59% (n=798 slides) Good 22% (n=302 slides) Insufficient Borderline 10% (n=135 slides) Poor 9% (n=122 slides) 75% Weak / False negative 20% False positive 5% Poor signal/noise, imp. morph., etc

2004 2006 2007 2008 2010 2011 2012 2014

2004 2006 2007 2008 2010 2011 2012 2014

HIER alk. ph 2- & 3-step kits Carefully calib. Uterine cervix all columnar epith. cells, and majority of basal squam. epith. cells (can be neg. in some pts).

Progesterone receptor; 75% Weak / False negative 20% False positive 5% Impaired morphology, etc Suf. Ins. Too low titre, Insufficient HIER Clone SP2 and 1E2. 1E2 mainly by off-label protocol (ext. sensitivity) Clone 1A6, Biotin-based kits, HIER in pressure cooker

Focus: Appropriate technical quality; signal-to-noise, morphology etc Appropriate analytical sensitivity and specificity indicated by concordance to FISH status in the included tumours.

NordiQC Internal QC of Test Material IHC status determined by: PATHWAY, HercepTest & Oracle Potential Donor tissue HER2 IHC status ISH status Selected Donor tissue HER2 HER2 0/1+ Un-amp. HER2 0/1+ Un-amp. HER2 2+ Un-amp. HER2 2+ Low level amp. IHC status Level 1 HER2 3+ High level amp. 4-6 identical TMA IHC status Level 2 IHC status Level 3 Slides circulated Thanks to the companies providing HER2 IHC kits for validation

NordiQC Internal QC of Test Material HercepTest PATHWAY Oracle Donor tissue validated by IHC using HercepTest, PATHWAY & Oracle Status confirmed by ISH

NordiQC Internal QC of Test Material TMA no. 1 HercepTest TMA no. 1 PATHWAY TMA no. 1 Oracle 3+ 2+ Each TMA (no: 1-6) validated by IHC using HercepTest, PATHWAY & Oracle

NordiQC Internal QC of Test Material TMA no. 1 Slide 1 Slide 50 Slide 100 Each TMA (no: 1-5) validated throughout the block by IHC using HercepTest, PATHWAY & Oracle 2+ Subsequently unstained slides are distributed to the laboratories

> CK7 6.0 2.3 2.6 1.3 1.7 1.1 1.4 Optimal Ampl. 3+ Ampl. 2+ Unampl. 2+ Unampl. 0 Poor 10-20% HER2+ found in 2+ cat. Ampl. 3+ Ampl. 1+ Unampl. 1+ Unampl. 0 26

> CK7 6.0 2.3 2.6 1.3 1.7 1.1 1.4 Optimal Ampl. 3+ Ampl. 2+ Unampl. 2+ Unampl. 0 Poor Ampl. 3+ Ampl. 2+ Unampl. 3+ Unampl. 1 27

Material processed according to ASCO/CAP

Pass rate of 19 HER2 IHC assessments in NordiQC App 90 % of insuff. results are FN and seen both by FDA / CE-IVD kits and laboratory developed assays. FP results have virtually only been seen by laboratory developed assays. 29

CK7 ISH: 2.5-2.8 ISH: 1.3-1.7 Optimal Ampl. 3+ Ampl. 2+ Unampl. 2+ Unampl. 0 ISH: 2.5-2.8 Good Increased need for additional ISH Ampl. 3+ Ampl. 2+ Unampl. 2+ Unampl. 2+ 31

32

33

Technically optimal results in the NordiQC HER2 ISH breast module: INFORM HER2 Dual ISH, Ventana ZytoDot 2C, ZytoVision HER2 black chr17 red HER2 green chr17 red U A 34

Typical causes for insufficient results in the NordiQC HER2 ISH breast module: FDA / CE-IVD HER2 BRISH (CISH/DDISH/etc) kits: INFORM HER2 Dual ISH, Ventana: Excessive proteolysis (>16M), HIER in CC1. DuoCISH pharmdx, Dako: Insufficient proteolysis, inappropriate handling of chromogen. ZytoDot 2C, ZytoVision: Excessive proteolysis. In 90% of insufficient results, no single or combination of causes could be identified 35

90% of ins. results used approriate protocol. 36

Technically insufficient results in the NordiQC HER2 ISH breast module: INFORM HER2 Dual ISH, Ventana HER2 black chr17 red Excessive protelysis U Neg areas >25% Silver precip. U 37

4 central parametres to adress for accurate HER2 IHC/ISH test 1. Pre-analytics mainly time-to and time-in NBF fixation 2. Analytical method used robustness and calibration 3. Control material precision of information 4. Interpretation experience, consistency, cut-off value

Lab 1; scored 1+ Lab 2; scored as 1+

Lab 1; scored 3+ Lab 2; scored as 3+

Lab 1; scored 2+ Lab 2; scored as 2+

What is faint? Visible at 40X? What is weak? Visible at 10X, 20X? Up to 20-40% HER2 IHC tests are reflexed to ISH due to expanded criteria for 2+ (internal data)

Pass rate of 19 HER2 IHC assessments in NordiQC From a technical point of view, it might be critical to change from a robust and relatively simple IHC assay to a less robust and complex test and simultanously more expensive test 43

Conclusions: 1. Pass rates for ER, PR and HER2 IHC are improved. Robust clones, high quality IHC systems. 2. FDA / CE-IVD labelled RTU assays / systems have shown superior performance compared to laboratory developed assays. 3. HER2 BRISH (DDISH/SISH/CISH) results have not been improved.

Assessors in NordiQC breast module and HER2 ISH Breast module Vibeke Jensen, DK Päivi Heikkilä, Fi Viktoria Gapar, SE Rasmus Røge, DK Søren Nielsen, DK (Assia Bassarova, NO) HER2 ISH Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm, DK Ole Nielsen, DK Michael Bzorek, DK Søren Nielsen, DK

See you later