Effects of the Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibitor Dalcetrapib in Patients with Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome

Similar documents
CETP inhibition: pros and cons. Philip Barter The Heart Research Institute Sydney, Australia

REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors - what have we learnt? Philip Barter The Heart Research Institute Sydney, Australia

The ACCELERATE Trial

The inhibition of CETP: From simply raising HDL-c to promoting cholesterol efflux and lowering of atherogenic lipoproteins Prof Dr J Wouter Jukema

Presented by Terje R. Pedersen Oslo Disclosure: Research grants and/or speaker- / consulting fees from Merck, MSP, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

Safety of Anacetrapib in Patients with or

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Characterization of Types and Sizes of Myocardial Infarction Reduced with Evolocumab in FOURIER

patient-oriented and epidemiological research

LDL Cholesterol Lowering with Evolocumab and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from the FOURIER Trial

Effects of Dalcetrapib in Patients with a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome

journal of medicine The new england Rosuvastatin to Prevent Vascular Events in Men and Women with Elevated C-Reactive Protein Abstract

Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinically Significant Bleeding with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in ACS

Methods. Background and Objectives STRADIVARIUS

Marshall Tulloch-Reid, MD, MPhil, DSc, FACE Epidemiology Research Unit Tropical Medicine Research Institute The University of the West Indies, Mona,

ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club

Case Presentation. Rafael Bitzur The Bert W Strassburger Lipid Center Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

Effective Treatment Options With Add-on or Combination Therapy. Christie Ballantyne (USA)

WHAT ABOUT AIM-HIGH?

The TNT Trial Is It Time to Shift Our Goals in Clinical

Does High-Intensity Pitavastatin Therapy Further Improve Clinical Outcomes?

STATINS EVALUATION IN CORONARY PROCEDURES AND REVASCULARIZATION

Is Lower Better for LDL or is there a Sweet Spot

Expert Meeting on Large Simple Trials (LST s)

How would you manage Ms. Gold

Treatment Of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone antagonist (TOPCAT) AHA Nov 18, 2014 Update on Randomized Trials

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

Online Appendices Online Appendix 1 Online Appendix 2 Online Appendix 3a Online Appendix 3b Online Appendix 3c Online Appendix 4 Online Appendix 5

Should we prescribe aspirin and statins to all subjects over 65? (Or even all over 55?) Terje R.Pedersen Oslo University Hospital Oslo, Norway

Hyperlipidemia: Lowering the Bar on the Lipid Limbo. Community Faculty Development Symposium March 13, 2004 Hugh Huizenga MD, MPH

Results of the GLAGOV Trial

1. Whether the risks of stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) differ from BMS and DES

Prospective Natural-History Study of Coronary Atherosclerosis

La prevenzione secondaria dopo sindrome coronarica acuta. Aldo Pietro Maggioni Centro Studi ANMCO Firenze

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Achieving Very Low LDL-C Levels With the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab in the FOURIER Outcomes Trial

Randomized comparison of single versus double mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 5 year outcomes of the Arterial Revascularization Trial

Antihypertensive Trial Design ALLHAT

Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo

Role of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Hossam Kandil,, MD. Professor of Cardiology Cairo University

Inflammation and and Heart Heart Disease in Women Inflammation and Heart Disease

Long-term prognostic value of N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) changes within one year in patients with coronary heart disease

Regulatory Hurdles for Drug Approvals

Experiences with interim trial monitoring, particularly with early stopped trials

ESC GUIDELINES ON DIABETES AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin and the under diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women: a prospective cohort study

Trial to Reduce. Aranesp* Therapy. Cardiovascular Events with

Making War on Cholesterol with New Weapons: How Low Can We/Should We Go? Shaun Goodman

Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS)

Cholesterol lowering intervention for cardiovascular prevention in high risk patients with or without LDL cholesterol elevation

No relevant financial relationships

ATP IV: Predicting Guideline Updates

New evidences in heart failure: the GISSI-HF trial. Aldo P Maggioni, MD ANMCO Research Center Firenze, Italy

Lipid Therapy: Statins and Beyond. Ivan Anderson, MD RIHVH Cardiology

Lifetime clinical and economic benefits of statin-based LDL lowering in the 20-year Followup of the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study

TICAGRELOR VERSUS CLOPIDOGREL AFTER THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ST- ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Controversies in Cardiac Pharmacology

Cardiovascular outcomes trials with non-statin lipid-lowering drugs in diabetes

In-Ho Chae. Seoul National University College of Medicine

Satish K Surabhi, MD.FACC,FSCAI,RPVI Medical Director, Cardiac Cath Labs AnMed Health Heart & Vascular Care

J-curve Revisited. An Analysis of Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Events in the Treating to New Targets (TNT) Trial

AHA Nov 18, 2013 Late Breaking Session

Coronary artery disease remains the leading

Dyslipidemia in the light of Current Guidelines - Do we change our Practice?

Review of guidelines for management of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients

Program Metrics. New Unique ID. Old Unique ID. Metric Set Metric Name Description. Old Metric Name

Disclosures for Presenter

ESC Geoffrey Rose Lecture on Population Sciences Cholesterol and risk: past, present and future

The updated guidelines from the National

The Framingham Coronary Heart Disease Risk Score

Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Practice Guidelines

CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial)

Practice-Level Executive Summary Report

Should I use statins?

Macrovascular Residual Risk. What risk remains after LDL-C management and intensive therapy?

Treatment of Stable Coronary Artery Disease Pharmacotherapy

What have We Learned in Dyslipidemia Management Since the Publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline?

Cardiovascular Complications of Diabetes

Decline in CV-Mortality

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content

Session : Why do stroke patients need a cardiologist? PREVALENCE OF CORONARY ATHEROSCLEROSIS IN PATIENTS WITH CEREBRAL INFARCTION

Protocol. This trial protocol has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work.

LLL Session - Nutrition support in diabetes and dyslipidemia. Dyslipidemia: targeting the management of cardiovascular risk factors. M.

Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials EXPLAINING THE DECREASE IN DEATHS FROM CHD! PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN WOMEN EXPLAINING THE DECREASE IN

Joslin Diabetes Center Advances in Diabetes and Thyroid Disease 2013 Consensus and Controversy in Diabetic Dyslipidemia

ARMYDA-RECAPTURE (Atorvastatin for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) trial

Environmental. Vascular / Tissue. Metabolics

Lipid Management 2013 Statin Benefit Groups

Coronary Artery Disease: Revascularization (Teacher s Guide)

What do the guidelines say about combination therapy?

Treatment to reduce cardiovascular risk: multifactorial management

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

A: Epidemiology update. Evidence that LDL-C and CRP identify different high-risk groups

Know Your Number Aggregate Report Single Analysis Compared to National Averages

IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial

Effect of Aliskiren on Postdischarge Outcomes Among Non-Diabetic Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure: Insights from the ASTRONAUT Outcomes Trial

Transcription:

Effects of the Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibitor Dalcetrapib in Patients with Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome Gregory G. Schwartz, MD PhD VA Medical Center and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado On behalf of the dal-outcomes* investigators * Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.

Background In observational analyses, higher levels of HDL-C are associated with lower cardiovascular risk However, it is uncertain whether raising HDL-C therapeutically reduces cardiovascular risk Inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) raises HDL-C and therefore might reduce cardiovascular risk Dalcetrapib is a CETP inhibitor that raised HDL-C by approximately 30% in Phase 2 trials, without effect on blood pressure or neurohormones.

Objective of the dal-outcomes trial To compare the effects of dalcetrapib with placebo, added to evidence-based background therapy, on cardiovascular risk in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome

Entry criteria Age 45 years Acute coronary syndrome Evidence-based management of LDL-C No restriction on entry level of HDL-C Key exclusions: Triglycerides >400 mg/dl; treatment with niacin, fibrates, or bile acid sequestrants.

Study design Single-blind placebo run-in 4-12 weeks Identify patient with ACS Randomization 1 : 1 Double-blind Dalcetrapib 600 mg Placebo Until 1600 primary endpoint events. Two prespecified interim analyses 935 sites in 27 countries

Outcome measures Primary outcome composite (time to first occurrence): Coronary heart disease death Non-fatal MI Ischemic stroke Hospitalization for unstable angina (with objective evidence of acute myocardial ischemia) Cardiac arrest with resuscitation Secondary outcome measures: All cause mortality Coronary revascularization

Flow of patients in the trial 19,005 entered single blind run-in 15,871 patients randomized Withdrawal of consent or loss to follow-up: dalcetrapib 3.9%, placebo 3.3% At the 2 nd pre-specified interim analysis, including 1135 (71% of projected) primary endpoint events, the DSMB recommended termination of the trial for futility. At termination, median follow-up 31 mo.

Baseline characteristics (all balanced between treatment groups) Mean age (years) 60 Female 19% Caucasian 88% Region Europe or Israel 50% North America 32% Cardiovascular risk factors Hypertension 68% Metabolic syndrome 63% Diabetes 24% Current smoker 21% Cardiac biomarker-positive qualifying (index) event 87% Time from index event to randomization (days) 61

Concurrent treatments (all balanced between treatment groups) PCI or CABG for index event (before randomization) 91% Statin 97% Aspirin 97% Clopidogrel, ticlopidine or prasugrel 89% Beta blocker 88% ACE inhibitor or ARB 79%

Baseline lipids (mean) (all balanced between treatment groups) mg/dl mmol/l LDL cholesterol 76 1.96 HDL cholesterol 42 1.09 Triglycerides 134 1.51

Data are mean ± 95% CI HDL-C by treatment group

Data are mean ± 95% CI LDL-C by treatment group

Primary outcome* by treatment group Hazard ratio 1.04 (95% CI 0.93-1.16) * Coronary heart disease death, non-fatal MI, ischemic stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, resuscitated cardiac arrest

Risk of primary and secondary outcomes Event Dalcetrapib (% at 3 years) Placebo (% at 3 years) Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P-value Primary composite 9.2 9.1 1.04 (0.93-1.16) 0.52 CHD death 1.6 1.8 0.94 (0.73-1.21) 0.66 Non-fatal MI 5.9 6.0 1.02 (0.89-1.17) 0.80 Unstable angina 1.3 1.3 0.91 (0.68-1.22) 0.54 Resuscitated cardiac arrest 0.2 0.1 1.41 (0.63-3.18) 0.40 Ischemic Stroke 1.4 1.0 1.25 (0.92-1.70) 0.16 All cause mortality 3.1 3.4 0.99 (0.82-1.19) 0.90 Coronary revascularization 9.5 9.6 1.00 (0.87-1.11) 0.97

Why did dalcetrapib fail to reduce risk?

No association between baseline HDL-C (by quintiles) and risk of primary endpoint

Systolic blood pressure and hs-crp were slightly higher with dalcetrapib than placebo With dalcetrapib, compared with placebo: Mean systolic blood pressure was 0.6 mm Hg higher (P<0.001) No effect on plasma aldosterone, bicarbonate, or potassium No difference in number of antihypertensive medications At 3 months of assigned treatment, median hs-crp was 0.2 mg/l higher (P<0.001, based on ANOVA after log transformation)

Conclusions In patients with recent ACS, the CETP inhibitor dalcetrapib raised HDL-C by ~30% with minimal effect on LDL-C and had no effect on the risk of major cardiovascular events. HDL-C concentration did not predict risk in this study population. Slightly higher systolic blood pressure and C-reactive protein with dalcetrapib might mark an adverse effect of inhibiting CETP.

Study Organization EXECUTIVE STEERING COMMITTEE: Gregory Schwartz (Chair) Anders G. Olsson (Co-Chair) Christie Ballantyne Philip Barter Bernard Chaitman (ex officio) Ingar Holme David Kallend (non-voting) Lawrence Leiter Eran Leitersdorf John McMurray Stephen Nicholls Prediman K. Shah Jean-Claude Tardif NATIONAL LEAD INVESTIGATORS: Rafael Diaz (AR) Gerald Maurer (AT) Harvey White/Philip Barter (AU) Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde (BE) Jose Antonio Marin-Neto (BR) Lawrence Leiter/Jean-Claude Tardif (CA) Paul Erne (CH) Runlin Gao (CN) Peter Ostadal (CZ) Wolfgang Koenig (DE) DSMB: Mogens Larsen (DK) José Lopez-Sendon (ES); Leo Niskanen (FI) Philippe Gabriel Steg (FR) Istvan Edes (HU) Peter Crean (IE) Eran Leitersdorf/Chaim Lotan (IL) Ezio Bramucci/Aldo Maggione (IT) Seung-Jung Park (KR) J. Wouter Jukema (NL) Marc Pfeffer (Chair) Rafael Carmena David Demets Terje Pedersen Jean-Lucien Rouleau CLINICAL EVENTS COMMITTEE: Bernard Chaitman (Chair) Richard Bach Salvador Cruz-Flores Daniel Fintel Gilbert Gosselin Cathy A. Sila Kristian Thygesen George Vetrovec Harvey White (NZ) Piotr Ponikowski (PO) Faris Al-Khalili (SE) Jan Murin (SK) Adrian Brady (UK) Michael Farkouh / Sanjay Kaul / Michael Miller / Stephen Nicholls / R. Scott Wright (US) Pravin Manga (ZA) SPONSOR: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd

Online publication 5 Nov 2012