News From Quest Diagnostics

Similar documents
News From Quest Diagnostics

News From Quest Diagnostics

News From Quest Diagnostics

News From Quest Diagnostics

News From Quest Diagnostics

Quest Diagnostics Drug Testing Index Full Year 2015 Tables

Marijuana Positivity Increases 6.2 Percent Nationally in Urine Drug Tests, but by Double Digits in Colorado and Washington

Hawaii, Arkansas and Oklahoma Lead the Nation for Methamphetamine Use in the Workforce, Reveals Quest Diagnostics Drug Testing Index

Workforce Drug Testing Positivity Climbs to Highest Rate Since 2004, According to New Quest Diagnostics Analysis

Illicit Drug Positivity Rate Increases Sharply in Workplace Testing, Finds Quest Diagnostics Drug Testing Index Analysis

Drug Testing Index. A comprehensive analysis of workplace drug use trends

Workforce Drug Positivity at Highest Rate in a Decade, Finds Analysis of More Than 10 Million Drug Test Results

Drug Testing Index A comprehensive analysis of workplace drug use trends

Why Drug Test in the Retail Industry? 2010 Retail Inventory Shrinkage 3. Employee Theft $16.2B (43.7%)

Slide into easier drug testing in Answers to 5 Frequently Asked Drug Test Questions

DRUGS DON T WORK HERE!

Kenosha County Drug and Alcohol Abuse Policy

2013 Clinical drug and alcohol testing solutions. Product Catalog. CLIA-waived point of care test devices

Adderall saliva drug test

Cutoff levels for hydrocodone in a blood test

Policy Title. Control Number HR003. Exception The Scotland County Sheriff s Department is subject to a separate policy.

The Drug Testing Process. Employer or Practice

Fitness for Duty in the Nuclear Power Industry

Rising Threats in the Nation s Drug Epidemic

PERMA 2016 ANNUAL CONFERENCE Drug and Alcohol Testing in the Workplace

Prescription Drug Impact in the Workplace

What Your Drug Test Really Means. Krista Beiermann, RN, OHS Occupational Health Services, Columbus Hospital

Drug Free Workplace and Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy Policy Number 4-C-4000 Original Issue Date: 01/01/2016 Effective Date: 12/22/2016

Rapid Alcohol Screening Devices. p19

Beating Drug Tests and Defending Positive Results

CURRENT U.S. DRUG TESTING PRACTICES

Drug & Alcohol Testing in. Canada. Point of Care Testing

Rules and Regulations. Rules and Regulations

OralTox instant oral fluid drug testing

Hair Drug Testing Drugs of Abuse Hair Testing

Reducing Liability by Hiring The Right Employ lo ee What Type of Screenings to Conduct Why Conduct Background Checks?

Testing for Controlled Substances

Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission. POSITION ON EMPLOYMENT-RELATED ALCOHOL AND DRUG TESTING November 2006

1/27/ New Release, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, Valencia

NEWBERRY COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES SUBSTANCE ABUSE POLICY

Policy Writing and Advice 2 Manager Training 2 Employee Awareness 3 Rehabilitation 3

The Opioid Epidemic and How It is Impacting the Workplace. July 24, 2018

Abbreviations and Terms You Should Know

Confirm Limit--Level of detectable drugs in urine to confirm a positive test.

National Institute on Drug Abuse

Clearing Up The Confusion About Substance Abuse Testing

Substance Abuse Policy

Recent Developments in FRA s Post-Accident Toxicological Testing Program

SANGER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. All Personnel DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING FOR SCHOOL BUS DRIVERS

DrugConfirm Advanced Urine Dip Cards.

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY rd TEST EVENT Chemistry Urine Drug Testing

DrugConfirm Advanced Instant Urine Drug Test Cups Training Guide.

ARLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Policy Implementation Procedures Substance Abuse

Outlook and Outcomes Fiscal Year 2011

..,5_,'11, Substance Use and Child Welfare { .., l , 22,

Richard Evers. Research and Development Manager, Synergy Health. The Workplace War on Drugs: Historical and Modern Warfare

Epidemiology of non medical use of prescription drugs. Kamran Niaz, Survey and Statistics Section, Policy Analysis and Research Branch

A Legal Look at Medical Marijuana. John J. Clifford, Esq. Clifford and Kenny, LLP 171 Rockland Street Hanover, MA 02339

FILE DOSSIER REFiRRff REF RE 1 ~ : i

Drug Testing Basics. by Erowid

SmartNotes. Thermo Scientific Oral Fluid Assays for Drug Testing in the Workplace. Oral Fluids for Workplace Testing

Lacey Township High School Random Drug and Alcohol Testing

SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROGRAM

ALCOHOL AND DRUG-TESTING OF BUS DRIVERS REGULATION

KINESIOLOGY AND HEALTH STUDIES DEPARTMENT

2. DEFINITIONS. For the purposes of this policy the following terms are defined herein:

COMPLETE DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY & Testing Policy

Fastect II Drug Screen Dipstick Test Training and Certification Program

Drug Screening. Separating Facts from Myths

Office of Aerospace Medicine

New Entrants Safety Education Seminar for Georgia Motor Carriers CHAPTER 11

Did you know. Getting Started. Intoxication and Workers Compensation Claims

SUBSTANCE ABUSE MODEL POLICY

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Drug and Alcohol Testing DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING 7.7

Welcome - SAMHSA s Role. Welcome SAMHSA Key Messages 4. Welcome SAMHSA s Direction

Build Your Business with the Department of Transportation Substance Abuse Professional (SAP) Qualification

I n a 1991 New York City subway crash that resulted in five

The Myths and Facts About Oral Fluid Drug Testing

Opioid Epidemic as it Relates to Counties

CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES AND ALCOHOL TESTING AND PROHIBITED CONDUCT FOR DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION PROVIDERS

Module 6: Substance Use

T R A I N I N G G U I D E

Contract No. 952-M1 Collection Service Requirements Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ)

ORAL FLUID AS A CHEMICAL TEST FOR THE DRE PROGRAM : HISTORY, THE FUTURE, AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Figure 1. National Drug Overdose Deaths Number Among All Ages, by Gender,

Media Contact: Amy Rose Media Contact: Shelley Ducker (908) (240) (908)

Overall teen drug use continues gradual decline; but use of inhalants rises

13. Forensic Toxicology, Workplace Testing, Sports Medicine and Related Areas

MARIJUANA & WORKPLACE CHALLENGES. Jo McGuire Five Minutes of Courage

DAWN. In 2009, nearly 4.6 million emergency

In 2009, nearly 4.6 million emergency

Opioids drive continued increase in drug overdose deaths

Cohen & Grigsby, P.C., progressive law.

QuickTox Drug Screen Dipcard (with and without Adulteration Tests)

Division of Workplace Programs, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

DRUG TESTING FOR DISTRICT PERSONNEL REQUIRED TO HOLD A COMMERCIAL DRIVER S LICENSE

SalivaConfirm Premium

National Drug Early Warning System (NDEWS) Sentinel Community Site (SCS) Drug Use Patterns and Trends: SCS Snapshot

Drug Epidemics: Things You Need to Know. Prof. Carl L. Hart Columbia University. drcarlhart.com

Transcription:

Quest Diagnostics Incorporated 1290 Wall Street West Lyndhurst, NJ 07071 Quest Diagnostics Contacts: Laure Park (Investors): 201-393-5030 Jennifer Somers (Media): 201-393-5700 News From Quest Diagnostics Drug Use Hits New Low Among U.S. Workers in 2006, According to Quest Diagnostics Drug Testing Index -- Lowest levels since 1988 -- -- Significant decline in use of amphetamines and marijuana continues trend from previous year -- LYNDHURST, N.J., March 7, 2007 A continued decline in drug positivity for the amphetamine class of drugs among safety-sensitive workers, coupled with a decrease in positive marijuana drug test results among the general U.S. workforce, drove workplace drug use to a new low in 2006. These were the main findings of the annual Drug Testing Index released today by Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (NYSE: DGX), the nation s leading provider of employment-related drug testing services. The 2006 Drug Testing Index showed that positivity for amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamine and methamphetamine as a percent of all tests for the substance) declined 20 percent to hit to a new low level among federally mandated, safety-sensitive workers 0.28 percent, down from 0.35 percent in 2005. Among the general workforce, positivity for amphetamines declined 12.5 percent from 0.48 percent in 2005 to 0.42 percent in 2006. In addition, the number of positive tests for marijuana, as a percent of the total number of tests for the drug, was down 6.3 percent among the U.S. general workforce compared to 2005 to 2.38 percent from 2.54 percent. The 2006 Drug Testing Index summarizes the results of more than nine million workplace drug tests performed by Quest Diagnostics between January and December 2006. Overall, the testing data indicated that drug use by employees and applicants fell to the lowest level since Quest Diagnostics began publishing the Drug Testing Index in 1988. Of all urine workplace drug tests performed by Quest Diagnostics during 2006 for the combined U.S. workforce, 3.8 percent had positive results, compared to 4.1 percent in 2005 and 13.6 percent in 1988. We believe this continued decline in workforce drug positivity may be driven by two factors: increased employer vigilance about the impact of workplace drug abuse on liability and the cost of decreased productivity, and the possibility that those who abuse drugs may tend to avoid employment at companies that actively conduct drug testing, said Barry Sample, Ph.D., Director of Science and Technology for Quest Diagnostics Employer Solutions division.

Data from the 2005 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) presented by the Department of Health and Human Services supports the idea that drug testing is a deterrent to employee drug use. The survey found that individuals whose employers do not have a drug testing program reported a nearly 50 percent higher incidence of illicit drug use, in the previous 30 days, compared to those with drug testing programs - 7.1 percent compared to 10.5 percent 1. Last year, prompted by strong interest from the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, Quest Diagnostics performed a preliminary review of drug-test positives for amphetamines for the first five months in 2006. Those preliminary results were consistent with the annual 2006 findings. Between January and May 2006, drug-test positives for amphetamines among general U.S. workforce employees totaling 0.43 percent of all drug tests identifying use of amphetamines declined 10 percent compared to 2005. Among federally mandated, safety-sensitive workers, the positivity rate for amphetamines also was consistent with annual results, declining 20 percent during the same period and tallying 0.28 percent of all drug tests that look for amphetamines use. Amphetamines belong to a category of drugs known as stimulants, which are used by individuals to increase alertness, relieve fatigue and feel stronger and more decisive. 2 Amphetamines include the drugs amphetamine, dextroamphetamine and methamphetamine, and their variations. Methamphetamine is typically produced clandestinely for illicit use. Color graphics of the Drug Testing Index, including regional maps that show positivity rates by type of drug, are available on-line at www.questdiagnostics.com to provide more localized workplace drug test data. The Drug Testing Index is released every six months as a service for government, media and industry, and is considered a benchmark for national trends. About the Drug Testing Index The Drug Testing Index is published as a public service for government, media and industry and has been considered a benchmark for national trends since its inception in 1988. It examines positivity rates the proportion of positive results for each drug to all such drug tests performed among three major testing populations: federally mandated, safety-sensitive workers; the general workforce; and the combined U.S. workforce. Federally mandated, safety-sensitive workers include pilots, bus and truck drivers, and workers in nuclear power plants, for whom routine drug testing is mandated by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 1 U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. NATIONAL SURVEY ON DRUG USE AND HEALTH, 2005 [Computer file]. ICPSR04596-v1. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute [producer], 2006. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2006-11-16. 2 Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and SAMHSA s National Clearinghouse for Alcohol and Drug Information, Drug Category Profile: Stimulants, http://ncadi.samhsa.gov/govpubs/rpo926/ 2

About Quest Diagnostics Quest Diagnostics is the leading provider of diagnostic testing, information and services that patients and doctors need to make better healthcare decisions. The company offers the broadest access to diagnostic testing services through its national network of laboratories and patient service centers, and provides interpretive consultation through its extensive medical and scientific staff. Quest Diagnostics is a pioneer in developing innovative new diagnostic tests and advanced healthcare information technology solutions that help improve patient care. Additional company information is available at: www.questdiagnostics.com. The statements in this press release which are not historical facts or information may be forwardlooking statements. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and outcomes to be materially different. Certain of these risks and uncertainties may include, but are not limited to, competitive environment, changes in government regulations, changing relationships with customers, payers, suppliers and strategic partners and other factors described in the Quest Diagnostics Incorporated 2006 Form 10-K and subsequent SEC filings. The Drug Testing Index 2007 Quest Diagnostics Incorporated. All rights reserved. (tables follow) 3

Annual Positivity Rates (For Combined U.S. Workforce) (More than 9.0 million tests from January to December 2006) Year Drug Positive Rate 1988 13.6% 1989 12.7% 1990 11.0% 1991 8.8% 1992 8.8% 1993 8.4% 1994 7.5% 1995 6.7% 1996 5.8% 1997 5.0% 1998 4.8% 1999 4.6% 2000 4.7% 2001 4.6% 2002 4.4% 2003 4.5% 2004 4.5% 2005 4.1% 2006 3.8% Positivity Rates By Testing Category Testing Category 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Federally Mandated, Safety-Sensitive 2.0% 2.3% 2.3% 2.5% 2.5% Workforce General U.S. Workforce 4.4% 4.5% 4.9% 5.0% 4.8% Combined U.S. Workforce 3.8% 4.1% 4.5% 4.5% 4.4% 4

Positivity Rates By Testing Reason (For Federally Mandated, Safety-Sensitive Workforce) (More than 2.0 million tests from January to December 2006) Testing Reason 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Follow-Up 3.0% 3.1% 3.3% 3.4% 3.8% For Cause 12.5% 13.4% 14.1% 13.8% 14.3% Periodic 0.6% 0.8% 0.51% 0.75% 0.95% Post-Accident 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 3.1% 3.3% Pre-Employment 2.3% 2.6% 2.7% 2.9% 2.9% Random 1.5% 1.8% 1.8% 1.9% 1.9% Returned to Duty 3.2% 3.0% 2.9% 2.8% 3.4% Positivity Rates By Testing Reason (For General U.S. Workforce) (More than 6.9 million tests from January to December 2006) Testing Reason 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Follow-Up 7.4% 9.6% 9.9% 9.6% 10.3% For Cause 18.1% 28.3% 27.8% 28.2% 25.9% Periodic 1.9% 2.4% 1.9% 2.2% 2.7% Post-Accident 5.7% 5.8% 5.7% 5.7% 5.9% Pre-Employment 3.9% 3.9% 4.1% 4.1% 4.3% Random 5.5% 6.6% 7.1% 6.6% 6.5% Returned to Duty 5.8% 6.0% 5.5% 5.6% 5.6% 5

Positivity Rates By Drug Category (For Federally Mandated, Safety-Sensitive Workforce, as a percentage of all such tests) (More than 2.0 million tests from January to December 2006) Drug Category 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Amphetamines 0.28% 0.35% 0.31% 0.29% 0.28% Cocaine 0.58% 0.60% 0.57% 0.59% 0.56% Marijuana 0.94% 1.10% 1.25% 1.34% 1.44% Opiates 0.17% 0.18% 0.17% 0.19% 0.19% PCP 0.03% 0.04% 0.04% 0.04% 0.04% Positivity Rates By Drug Category (For General U.S. Workforce, as a percentage of all such tests) (More than 6.9 million tests from January to December 2006) Drug Category 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Amphetamines 0.42% 0.48% 0.52% 0.49% 0.34% Barbiturates 0.23% 0.25% 0.27% 0.29% 0.30% Benzodiazepines 0.62% 0.58% 0.58% 0.60% 0.58% Cocaine 0.72% 0.70% 0.72% 0.74% 0.71% Marijuana 2.38% 2.54% 2.88% 2.96% 2.98% Methadone 0.22% 0.23% 0.21% 0.20% 0.16% Opiates 0.32% 0.32% 0.32% 0.34% 0.27% Oxycodones 0.64% 1 0.56% 2 -- -- -- PCP 0.01% 0.02% 0.01% 0.03% 0.02% Propoxyphene 0.55% 0.57% 0.63% 0.67% 0.73% Positivity Rates By Drug Category (For Combined U.S. Workforce, as a percentage of all such tests) (More than 9.0 million tests from January to December 2006) Drug Category 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Amphetamines 0.39% 0.46% 0.49% 0.45% 0.33% Barbiturates 0.23% 0.25% 0.27% 0.29% 0.29% Benzodiazepines 0.62% 0.58% 0.58% 0.60% 0.56% Cocaine 0.69% 0.69% 0.70% 0.71% 0.66% Marijuana 2.04% 2.28% 2.59% 2.67% 2.67% Methadone 0.22% 0.23% 0.21% 0.20% 0.15% Opiates 0.28% 0.29% 0.29% 0.31% 0.25% Oxycodones 0.64% 1 0.56% 2 -- -- -- PCP 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.03% 0.03% Propoxyphene 0.55% 0.57% 0.63% 0.67% 0.73% 1 Approximately 400,000 tests 2 More than 200,000 tests 6

Non-Negative Rates By Specimen Validity Test (SVT) 3 Category (For Federally Mandated, Safety-Sensitive Workforce, as a percentage of all such tests) (More than 2.0 million tests from January to December 2006) SVT Category 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Acid-Base 0.00% 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% Invalid 0.12% 0.12% 0.08% 0.08% 0.06% 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% 0.03% 0.05% Substitution 0.05% 0.05% 0.06% 0.06% 0.05% Non-Negative Rates By Specimen Validity Test (SVT) 3 Category (For General U.S. Workforce, as a percentage of all such tests) (More than 6.9 million tests from January to December 2006) SVT Category 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Acid-Base 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% Invalid 0.15% 0.16% 0.10% 0.10% 0.09% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% 0.02% 0.05% Substitution 0.01% 0.01% 0.03% 0.03% 0.03% 3 Specimen validity testing is the evaluation of a specimen to determine if it is consistent with a normal human specimen. Tests for specimen validity include tests to determine whether a specimen is adulterated or substituted. 7

Non-Negative Rates By Drug/SVT Category (For Federally Mandated, Safety-Sensitive Workers, as a Percentage of All Non-Negatives) (More than 45 thousand non-negative test results from January to December 2006) Drug/SVT 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Category Acid/Base 0.15% 0.27% 0.32% 0.37% 0.45% Amphetamines 12.6% 14.8% 12.7% 11.4% 10.8% Cocaine 26.3% 25.4% 23.2% 22.7% 21.1% Invalid 5.7% -- -- -- -- Marijuana 43.8% 47.8% 52.4% 53.6% 56.0% Opiates 7.8% 7.7% 7.1% 7.4% 7.3% 0.00% 0.06% 0.42% 0.52% 0.90% PCP 1.6% 1.8% 1.4% 1.7% 1.5% Substituted 2.2% 2.3% 2.4% 2.3% 1.9% Non-Negative Rates By Drug/SVT Category (For General U.S. Workforce, as a Percentage of All Non-Negatives) (More than 330 thousand non-negative test results from January to December 2006) Drug/SVT 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Category Acid/Base 0.04% 0.06% 0.11% 0.16% 0.25% Amphetamines 8.8% 10.1% 10.0% 9.0% 6.7% Barbiturates 2.6% 2.7% 2.7% 2.8% 2.9% Benzodiazepines 6.1% 5.4% 5.0% 5.1% 5.0% Cocaine 15.0% 14.7% 13.8% 13.8% 13.9% Invalid 3.2% -- -- -- -- Marijuana 49.5% 53.0% 55.0% 55.0% 57.7% Methadone 2.0% 2.0% 1.7% 1.6% 1.2% Methaqualone 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Opiates 6.6% 6.6% 6.1% 6.3% 5.3% Oxycodones 0.74% -- -- -- -- 0.00% 0.05% 0.16% 0.48% 0.51% PCP 0.31% 0.31% 0.28% 0.51% 0.47% Propoxyphene 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 5.0% 5.6% Substituted 0.27% 0.26% 0.49% 0.58% 0.54% 8

Non-Negative Rates By Drug/SVT Category (For Combined U.S. Workforce, as a Percentage of All Non-Negatives) (More than 380 thousand non-negative test results from January to December 2006) Drug/SVT 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Category Acid/Base 0.05% 0.08% 0.13% 0.18% 0.27% Amphetamines 9.3% 10.6% 10.2% 9.3% 7.1% Barbiturates 2.3% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.6% Benzodiazepines 5.4% 4.9% 4.5% 4.7% 4.5% Cocaine 16.4% 15.7% 14.7% 14.6% 14.6% Invalid 3.5% -- -- -- -- Marijuana 48.8% 52.5% 54.8% 54.9% 57.6% Methadone 1.8% 1.8% 1.5% 1.4% 1.1% Methaqualone 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Opiates 6.7% 6.7% 6.2% 6.4% 5.5% 0.00% 0.09% 0.19% 0.52% 0.54% Oxycodones 0.65% -- -- -- -- PCP 0.46% 0.45% 0.38% 0.61% 0.58% Propoxyphene 4.3% 4.4% 4.4% 4.5% 5.1% Substituted 0.49% 0.45% 0.66% 0.73% 0.68% ### 9