Letter of Amendment # 3 to:

Similar documents
If the HPTN 082 protocol is amended in the future, this Letter of Amendment will be incorporated into the next version.

December 14, Letter of Amendment 1 Version 2.0 HVTN 704/HPTN 085

GSK , 2.0, 18, 2014, DAIDS

Letter of Amendment # 3 to:

The Feasibility of HIV Prevention Cohort Studies among Men who have Sex with Men (MSM) in sub-saharan Africa

LETTER OF AMENDMENT #2 TO: MTN-036/IPM 047. A Phase 1, Randomized Pharmacokinetics and Safety Study of Extended Duration Dapivirine Vaginal Rings

SUMMARY OF CHANGES INCLUDED IN THE FULL PROTOCOL AMENDMENT OF:

Engaging a Hidden Population to Stop HIV

2016 NYS HIV Quality of Care Review

Modernization of North Carolina s HIV control measures

Clarification Memo # 1 to:

Billing Code: P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [60Day-12-12MW]

Black MSM, HIV, and the Social Determinants of Health Imperative

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for Providers Counseling Male Patients and

Financial Incentives, Linkage to Care and Viral Suppression HPTN 065 (TLC-Plus) Study. Wafaa El-Sadr ICAP at Columbia University New York, NY

Strategic Peer-Enhanced Care and Treatment Retention Model (SPECTRuM) Initiative. Intervention Protocol #2

Changes in viral suppression status among US HIV-infected patients receiving care

GLOBAL AIDS MONITORING REPORT

Section 5. Study Procedures

HPTN 078 Enhancing Recruitment, Linkage to Care and Treatment for HIV-Infected Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in the United States

Modelling HIV Transmission and Treatment for US MSM to Estimate the Impact of HPTN 078 on HIV Incidence

VL patient support: General education at different levels

VERBAL CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A RESEARCH STUDY AND HIPPA AUTHORIZATION

Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and. AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),

Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and. AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),

November 9, Clarification Memo 1 Version 3.0 HVTN 704/HPTN 085

High Impact Prevention: Science, Practice, and the Future of HIV

Clinical and Behavioral Characteristics of HIV-infected Young Adults in Care in the United States

HIV Screening & Consent for Testing

Follow-up Visit Procedures MTN-009

The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

NIH NEW CLINICAL TRIAL REQUIREMENTS AND FORMS-E

THE PORTUGUESE COMMUNITY SCREENING NETWORK

APHL/CDC HIV Demonstration Project Demonstration Project for HIV Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) Referral Updated: January 2018

Billing Code: P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [30Day-18-17AUZ]

Using anti-hiv drugs for prevention

Organizational HIV Treatment Cascade Guidance for Construction. Introduction. Background

Retention in HIV Care

State of Alabama HIV Surveillance 2013 Annual Report Finalized

On the Horizon for Consideration: Biomedical Advances in HIV Prevention

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT PARTNERS PrEP AND VOICE

ICAP Journal Club. Article. Study Summary

Investigator Initiated Study Proposal Form

MANITOBA HIV REPORT 2015

Hormonal contraception and HIV risk

Measure #340 (NQF 2079): HIV Medical Visit Frequency - National Quality Strategy Domain: Efficiency And Cost Reduction

Anti Retroviral Traitment (ARVs)

Evaluating an enhanced adherence intervention among HIV positive adolescents failing 2 nd line treatment

Regional program of the East Europe and Central Asia Union of PLWH within the framework of the Global Fund New Funding Model

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:

BHIVA Workshop: When to Start. Dr Chloe Orkin Dr Laura Waters

PrEP 201: Beyond the Basics

In 2015, blacks comprised 12% of the US population, but accounted for 45% of those infected with HIV. Whites were 62% of the population, but

Trends in HIV Incidence and Prevalence in the United States

State of Alabama HIV Surveillance 2014 Annual Report

Harm Reduction in Nigeria

EXPRESSION OF INTEREST New Horizons Advancing Pediatric HIV Care Donation Program

Improving Patient Engagement in HIV Care: Health Department Strategies

FINAL Letter of Amendment # 1 to:

UGANDA POPULATION-BASED HIV IMPACT ASSESSMENT UPHIA

in Non-Profit Organizations Serving

HIV/AIDS KNOWLEDGE SERIES NO. 46 APRIL 1996

Goal of this chapter. 6.1 Introduction Good practices for linkage to care General care for people living with HIV 84

FY 2018 PERFORMANCE PLAN. Public Health/ CHSB

Section 5. Study Procedures

Arresting HIV in Malawi prisons

Arizona State Office of Rural Health Webinar Series

Ratana Sopha Manager: HIV Prevention and Innovations KHANA. 2 nd Asia-Pacific AIDS and Co-infections Conference. Hong Kong June 2, 2017

C.H.A.I.N. Report. Strategic Plan Progress Indicators: Baseline Report. Report 2003_1 ADDITIONS /MODIFICATIONS

The Counselling of Blood Donors Identified as HIV Reactive. A Review as from January 2007 until June 2011

Data inputs for HIV models and how they inform HIV prevention interventions Dobromir Dimitrov

Lessons from MSM PrEP pilots / demonstration projects. Kevin Rebe

Fertility Desires/Management of Serodiscordant HIV + Couples

HIV: Pregnancy in Serodiscordant Couple. Dr Chow TS ID Clinic HPP

[Submitted Electronically]

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REFERENCE SHEETS FOR KEY POPULATIONS

HIV/AIDS CLINICAL CARE QUALITY MANAGEMENT CHART REVIEW CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVED IMMUNOLOGIC STATUS

Public-Private Collaboration to Re-engage Out-of-Care Persons into HIV Care

Chicago Department of Public Health

Questions and answers: HVTN 084 vaccine trial

Donor Registration and Consent for HLA Typing

EHIVQUAL. For use with ehivqual, an electronic web based program for quality of care data collection and review REVIEW PERIOD:

High Yield and Feasibility of Baby Boomer Birth Cohort HCV Screening in Two Urban, Academic Emergency Departments

Sexual Health reproduction in reference to treatment as/for prevention

Evaluating HIV Clinical Care Quality in the Massachusetts Sites supported through the Medical Case Management System Results from review

Section 10. Counseling Procedures

Low-threshold Harm Reduction Housing is HIV Prevention and Health Care

Sexually Transmitted Infection Treatment and HIV Prevention

HIV Partner Services in HIV Care Programs

Fertility Center and Sperm Bank Manual for the Fertile Hope Program for Men

Ending the Epidemic in New York State

PHSKC HIV Testing Survey: Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices

Navigating Alliance Protocols

NYS PrEP Programming. Lyn Stevens, NP, MS, ACRN Office of the Medical Director, AIDS Institute PrEP Monitoring in NYC and NYS February 19, 2016

HIV Testing and HIV Prevention

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AIDS INSTITUTE

The Undetectables Viral Load Suppression (VLS) Project

HIV/AIDS MEASURES GROUP OVERVIEW

Acceptability of HPTN 077. The George Washington University HPTN Clinical Research Site 16 June 2016

HPTN 071. Statistical Analysis Plan. Deborah Donnell, PhD Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutch, Seattle WA

Transcription:

Letter of Amendment # 3 to: HPTN 078: Enhancing Recruitment, Linkage to Care and Treatment for HIV-Infected Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in the United States Version 1.0, dated 8 October 2015 DAIDS Document ID: 11995 Final Version of LoA # 3: 23 June 2016 The following information impacts the HPTN 078 study and must be forwarded to all responsible Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) as soon as possible for their information and review. This Letter of Amendment (LoA) must be approved by all responsible IRBs before implementation. The information contained in this LoA impacts the sample screening informed consent form (ICF). Upon receiving final IRB approval for this LoA and the revised screening ICF, sites should implement the LoA immediately. Sites are still required to submit a LoA registration packet to the DAIDS Protocol Registration Office (PRO) at the Regulatory Support Center (RSC). Sites will receive a registration notification for the LoA once the DAIDS PRO verifies that all the required LoA registration documents have been received and are complete. A LoA registration notification from the DAIDS PRO is not required prior to implementing the LoA. A copy of the LoA registration notification along with the LoA and any IRB correspondence should be retained in the site s regulatory files. If the HPTN 078 protocol is amended in the future, this LoA will be incorporated into the next version. Deletions to the protocol text are indicated by strikethrough; additions are indicated in bold. Summary of Revisions and Rationale 1. Removes Richard Wolitski from the protocol roster 2. Allows direct recruitment, in addition to recruitment via DC-RDS, for the CM intervention, if enrollment targets are not being met by the fourth month of recruitment, on a site by site basis. 3. Allows the distribution of up to six coupons to seeds only. This revision would allow us to use our seeds twice (first giving them three coupons, and then giving them up to three additional coupons if they have distributed their coupons, but they have not been returned to the site by the recipients). The rationale for making this change for seeds only is that it would limit the number of initiated chains, but improve the chance of chain propagation from those who were chosen as some of the best, well-connected representatives of the local MSM population. All other recruiters would only receive three coupons; thus, all references to the number of coupons have been removed from the protocol. Details about how seeds may be given up to six coupons to distribute will be added to the SSP. HPTN 078 Letter of Amendment #3 to Protocol Version 1.0 Page 1 of 6

Summary of Revisions and Rationale (continued) 4. Removes the specific reference to ten seeds, as we may release more at some sites. 5. Allows for the collection of blood for CD4 and VL testing at the S1 visit, if the HIV status of the individual (either via self-report or by rapid test administered outside of the study) is positive. For some sites, this may allow for a more streamlined approach for their screening visit flow for those who are HIV-infected. 6. Indicates that the collection of social impacts at the S1 visit is not required for seeds. 7. Revises the Screening ICF to include an explanation that direct recruitment may be used in the study and clarifies that additional blood will be taken for HIV re-testing if the first HIV test is indeterminate Revision 1 PROTOCOL TEAM ROSTER Implementation Richard J. Wolitski, PhD Senior Advisor for Indicator Monitoring and Program Improvement National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, & TB Prevention Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road (MS E-07) Atlanta, GA 30329 Phone: 404-639-1939 Email: rwolitski@cdc.gov Revisions 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 3.0 STUDY POPULATION Approximately 2700 sexually active MSM (~675 in each participating city) will be recruited for HIV testing via DC-RDS and, possibly, direct recruitment. Out of this cohort, 356 HIV-infected MSM who are not virally suppressed and meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria described below will be enrolled into the CM intervention and SOC control study arms. 3.3 Recruitment Process DC-RDS will be used to recruit MSM into this study, to the extent possible. In this method, 8-10 multiple seeds will be identified in each city, although not all seeds will necessarily be activated throughout the life of the study. Seeds will be the individuals who begin the recruitment chains; they will be selected to represent a range of characteristics (including ethnic and racial minority status) and because they are well-networked within the population. These seeds will undergo training to become a recruiter. They will then be given three coupons with which to recruit others to the study. HPTN 078 Letter of Amendment #3 to Protocol Version 1.0 Page 2 of 6

Seeds must meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the study and are considered study participants. As this protocol is testing the ability of DC-RDS methodology to find HIV-positive, virally unsuppressed MSM, DC-RDS recruitment will continue throughout the duration of the enrollment period. However, if enrollment targets are not met by the fourth month of recruitment at any given site, direct recruitment (in addition to DC-RDS) will be allowed on a site-by-site basis in order to fully enroll for the CM intervention investigation. These new participants may be treated as seeds, if a given site still needs to initiate additional recruitment chains. There will be no difference in study procedures between participants recruited via DC-RDS and direct recruitment, except that they may or may not be treated as seeds, and thus, may or may not distribute coupons to others. All seeds, and subsequent participant/recruiters, must not recruit anyone other than peers they know personally who are MSM. These recruits will come to the site and, if they are eligible and agree to participate, will undergo the study s screening procedures before becoming recruiters themselves. Participants will return approximately two weeks later for a second visit, during which they will be reimbursed for the coupons that were brought back to the clinic by other MSM. During this second visit a post-recruitment questionnaire will be administered to characterize how many people in total were approached in the distribution of the three coupons and the characteristics (e.g., age, race) of those who did and did not accept a coupon. 5.1.1 First Screening Visit (S1) During the first Screening Visit (S1), participants will be consented for the screening procedures, asked for locator information, to complete several questionnaires (see Appendix II) and to have blood collected for laboratory assessments (HIV, HCV and syphilis) and plasma storage. If a participant is known to be HIV-positive at the S1 visit (either via self-report or by rapid test administered outside of the study), blood may be drawn for CD4 and VL at this visit instead of at the S2 visit. In addition, preand post-test HIV counseling and HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk reduction counseling will be provided to all participants, as appropriate. Participants will also be assessed for social impacts that may have occurred during the recruitment process. Each participant will be given instructions about the recruitment process, as well as three coupons for distribution. 5.1.2 Second Screening Visit (S2) All participants will be asked to return for a second Screening Visit (S2) to receive the results of their HIV, syphilis and HCV tests. Post-test HIV counseling and HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk reduction counseling will be provided, as appropriate. If an individual is found to be HIV-infected or has discordant or inconclusive HIV test results, blood will be drawn for CD4 and viral load (HIV RNA) testing and additional plasma storage. If a participant has already had blood drawn for CD4 and VL at the S1 visit, it does not have to repeated at the S2 visit; however, blood for plasma storage is still required. They will also undergo a social impact assessment. Additional blood will be collected for HIV testing and plasma storage at the second Screening Visit if the HIV test results from the first Screening Visit were not conclusive. A post-recruitment questionnaire will be administered to anyone distributing coupons. HPTN 078 Letter of Amendment #3 to Protocol Version 1.0 Page 3 of 6

Blood will not be collected from individuals who tested negative for HIV infection at the first screening visit (i.e., those who did not have reactive or positive HIV test result from the S1 visit). 7.1 Review of Study Design This study is designed to i) evaluate the utility of deep-chain respondent driven sampling (DC-RDS) for finding HIV-infected MSM who are not virally suppressed, and ii) assess the efficacy of an CM intervention package for linking HIV-infected MSM to care and, ultimately, achieving viral suppression. Approximately 2700 MSM will be identified and recruited (see Sections 7.2.1 and 7.6.1 for definition of recruitment) using a DC-RDS strategy in four cities (~675 per city). We expect that approximately 378 of these will be HIV-infected MSM who are not virally suppressed and that 356 of these will be willing to participate. If insufficient HIV-infected MSM who are not virally suppressed are recruited through DC-RDS then individuals may be recruited from other sources. These 356 will be randomized to the CM intervention and SOC control study arms of the study. The CM intervention arm will provide a package designed to enhance linkage to care, antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation, treatment adherence, and retention in care. The intervention will be delivered by a trained CM. The SOC control arm will provide the SOC for linkage to care, initiation of ART, and treatment. The primary outcome of the study is viral suppression 24 months after enrollment. 7.3 Accrual, Follow-up and Sample Size We will recruit approximately 2700 men via DC-RDS. We expect that 20% (540) will be HIV-infected MSM and that 70% of those (378) will not be suppressed. These 378 individuals form the pool of individuals eligible for enrollment and randomization. If necessary, more than 2700 MSM will be recruited via DC-RDS to achieve the required sample size for enrollment. Conversely, recruitment will continue until at least 2700 MSM are screened (even after the CM intervention and SOC control arms are fully enrolled), so that the DC-RDS-related endpoints can be fully assessed. If insufficient numbers of HIV-infected MSM with unsuppressed viral load are recruited through DC-RDS, then such MSM may be recruited from other sources. 7.6.1 Primary Analysis To assess the ability of DC-RDS to recruit HIV-infected MSM who are not virally suppressed we will measure the proportion of the men that are recruited by DC-RDS (where recruitment is defined as providing a blood draw for HIV and HIV viral load testing) who are HIV-infected and not virally suppressed. An estimate and a 95% confidence interval (CI) based on RDS methods76 will be reported. MSM recruited via other methods will not be included in this analysis. 7.6.2 Secondary Analysis We will divide the (approximately 2700) MSM who are recruited into early and later waves of DC-RDS (the definition of early and late will be included in the statistical analysis plan). We will use a two sample test of proportions (with standard errors adjusted for RDS sampling;76) to compare i) the proportion HIV-infected and ii) the proportion HIV-infected and not suppressed, between the early and later recruits. MSM HPTN 078 Letter of Amendment #3 to Protocol Version 1.0 Page 4 of 6

recruited via other methods will not be included in this analysis. A two-sided alpha level of 0.05 will be used for hypothesis testing. Appendix I: Schedule of Study Visits, Evaluations and Procedures Screening (S1) Screening (S2) Enrollment (M0) ART Initiation Monthly Contact 1 Follow-up (M3, M6, M9, M12, M18) Final (M24) Administrative and Behavioral Evaluations/Procedures Social impact assessment X* X I X X Laboratory Evaluations/Procedures CD4 cell count testing X** X 5 X 6 X 7 X HIV viral load testing X** X 5 X 6 X X Note: Monthly visits will be defined as a predetermined number of weeks, as described in the SSP. In addition, in special cases, the S2 and enrollment visits may take place on the same day (see SSP). X, all participants; I, CM intervention arm only. * Seeds do not undergo social impact assessment at the S1 visit. ** If a participant is known to be HIV-positive at the S1 visit, blood may be drawn for CD4 and VL at this visit instead of at the S2 visit. 5 CD4 cell count and HIV viral load testing will be performed at the S2 visit for those who are HIV-infected or have discordant/inconclusive HIV test results, unless already performed at the S1 visit (see SSP Manual). Revision 7 FROM SCREENING CONSENT FORM (Appendix IV) PURPOSE OF THE SCREENING The purpose of the screening activities is to find sexually active MSM using a technique called respondent driven sampling or RDS. In respondent driven sampling RDS, we ask MSM to refer other MSM they know to come to our clinic for screening. We plan to screen about 2700 participants from four US cities (approximately 675 in each participating city) within one year. During screening, we will test MSM for HIV, hepatitis C virus and syphilis. We will also ask each MSM to complete a questionnaire. In addition, if we find MSM who are HIV-infected, we may invite them to participate in a study testing whether case manager support can help MSM receive consistent HIV care and routinely take their HIV medication. If we do not find enough HIV-infected MSM using RDS, we may invite MSM to participate in this study that we find in other ways. Screening Visit 1 We will ask you if you have had any problems because you are a part of this screening, unless you are a seed, meaning that you are one of the first people in the study, and did not receive a coupon from someone in the community. HPTN 078 Letter of Amendment #3 to Protocol Version 1.0 Page 5 of 6

Screening Visit 2 We will collect a small amount of blood (approximately 33 ml = about 6 teaspoons) to test for HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV) and syphilis. The results of these tests will be available at your next visit. If you know you are HIV-infected at this visit, additional blood (approximately 14 ml = about 3 teaspoons) will be collected to measure your CD4 cell count and viral load. If you are HIV infected or your HIV infection status isn t clear, we will collect a small amount of blood (approximately 14 ml = about 3 teaspoons) to measure your CD4 cell count and viral load, if we haven t already done so at the S1 visit. If you do have HIV infection, these tests tell us how much HIV is in your blood (viral load) and how much the virus has affected your ability to fight the virus (CD4). If the results of your HIV tests from the first screening visit do not clearly indicate if you are or are not infected, we will collect a small amount of blood (approximately 20 ml = 4 teaspoons) also use the blood collected for additional HIV testing. In certain cases, we may give you more coupons and ask you to invite MSM you know to come to the clinic for screening. HPTN 078 Letter of Amendment #3 to Protocol Version 1.0 Page 6 of 6