Rizatriptan vs. ibuprofen in migraine: a randomised placebo-controlled trial

Similar documents
ANTIMIGRAINE MEDICINES

Pharmacological treatment of attacks in juvenile migraine

Adult & Pediatric Patients. Stanford Health Care, Division Pain Medicine

Faculty Disclosures. Learning Objectives. Acute Treatment Strategies

medications. This was an openlabel study consisting of patients with migraines who historically failed to respond to oral triptan

Value of postmarketing surveillance studies in achieving a complete picture of antimigraine agents: using almotriptan as an example

ACUTE TREATMENT FOR MIGRAINE. Cristina Tassorelli

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Despite the widespread use of triptans ... REPORTS... Almotriptan: A Review of Pharmacology, Clinical Efficacy, and Tolerability

Drug Class Review on Triptans

The use of combination therapies in the acute management of migraine

A new questionnaire for assessment of adverse events associated with triptans: methods of assessment influence the results. Preliminary results

Lasmiditan (200 mg and 100 mg) Compared to Placebo for Acute Treatment of Migraine

Disclosures. Triptans for Kids 5/16/13

MEASURE #1: MEDICATION PRESCRIBED FOR ACUTE MIGRAINE ATTACK Headache

Drug Class Review on the Triptans

Overuse of barbiturate and opioid containing medications for primary headache disorders Description

SUMAVEL DOSEPRO (sumatriptan succinate) solution for injection

...SELECTED ABSTRACTS...

Acute Migraine Treatment: What you and your family should know to help you make the best choices with your doctor

ONZETRA XSAIL (sumatriptan) nasal powder

Aspirin Is Efficacious for the Treatment of Acute Migraine

Update on Diagnosis and Management of Migraines

Eletriptan vs sumatriptan: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple migraine attack study

Zolmitriptan is effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with migraine: a dose response study

Migraine much more than just a headache

Prednisone vs. placebo in withdrawal therapy following medication overuse headache

Management options for Migraine. Prof. Dr. Khwaja Nazimuddin Head Dept. of Internal Medicine BIRDEM

Richard B Lipton 1, Brian Grosberg 1, Richard P Singer 2, Starr H Pearlman 3, James V Sorrentino 4, John N Quiring 5 and Joel R Saper 6.

ADVANCES IN MIGRAINE MANAGEMENT

Ana Podgorac Belgrade, May 2012

Triptans: Nonresponse, Recurrence, and Serious AEs for Many Patients

Setting The setting of the study was primary care. The economic study was conducted in the USA.

Prevention and Treatment of Migraines CAITLIN BARNES, PHARM.D. CANDIDATE AMBULATORY CARE JOE CAMMILLERI, PHARM.D. NATOHYA MALLORY, PHARM.D.

Headache Master School Japan-Osaka 2016 (HMSJ-Osaka2016) October 23, II. Management of Refractory Headaches

How do we treat migraine? New SIGN Guidelines

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

MEASURE #4: Overuse of Barbiturate Containing Medications for Primary Headache Disorders Headache

An economic evaluation of rizatriptan in the treatment of migraine Thompson M, Gawel M, Desjardins B, Ferko N, Grima D

Zolmitriptan nasal spray provides fast relief of migraine symptoms and is preferred by patients: a Swedish study of preference in clinical practice

Management of headache

Early treatment of a migraine attack while pain is still mild increases the efficacy of sumatriptan

Hoofdpijn in de apotheek

Is the Migraid device an asset in the non-pharmacologic treatment of migraine?

Patients preference for triptans and other medications as a tool for assessing the efficacy of acute treatments for migraine

The best defense is a good offense. Optimizing the Acute Treatment of Migraine. Disclosures 11/10/2017

I have no financial relationships to disclose. I will not discuss investigational use of medication in my presentation.

Migraine: Developing Drugs for Acute Treatment Guidance for Industry

Acute treatment of migraine in children and adolescents

Çiçek Wöber-Bingöl HEADACHE UNIT FOR CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENCE

Pain therapeutics. Acetaminophen/NSAIDs Acute pain Osteoarthritis Migraine Acute Gout Neuropathic pain

Crossover Comparison of Efficacy and Preference for Rizatriptan 10 mg versus Ergotamine/Caffeine in Migraine

Migraine is a primary headache disorder ... REPORTS... Migraine: Diagnosis, Management, and New Treatment Options

Chronic Migraine in Primary Care. December 11 th, 2017 Werner J. Becker University of Calgary

Migraineurs have specific preferences with regard to migraine therapy. In surveys,

Abortive Agents. Available Strengths. Formulary Limits. Tablet: 5mg, 10mg ODT: 5mg, 10 mg 25mg, 50mg, 100mg. 5mg/act, 20mg/act

10/17/2017 CHRONIC MIGRAINES BOTOX: TO INJECT OR NOT INJECT? IN CHRONIC MIGRAINE PROPHYLAXIS OBJECTIVES PATIENT CASE EPIDEMIOLOGY EPIDEMIOLOGY

Guidance for Industry Migraine: Developing Drugs for Acute Treatment

SIGN on the pharmacological management of migraine

Caspian Journal of Neurological Sciences "Caspian J Neurol Sci" Journal Homepage:

ISPUB.COM. C Suthisisang, N Poolsup, N Suksomboon INTRODUCTION

HMFP Comprehensive Headache Center Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Instructor in

Drug Class Review on Triptans

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION. Efficacy and Safety of Acetaminophen, Aspirin, and Caffeine in Alleviating Migraine Headache Pain

MIGRAINE A MYSTERY HEADACHE

Understanding. Migraine. Amy, diagnosed in 1989, with her family.

TABLE 1. Current Diagnostic Criteria for Migraine Without Aura 2 A. At least 5 attacks fulfilling criteria B-D B. Headache attacks lasting 4-72 hours

Ce12halalgia. Effectiveness of oral diclofenac in the acute treatment of common migraine attacks: a double-blind study versus placebo

The prevalence of premonitory symptoms in migraine: a questionnaire study in 461 patients

UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT CRITERIA

Preventive Effect of Greater Occipital Nerve Block on Severity and Frequency of Migraine Headache

Recognition and treatment of medication overuse headache

Month/Year of Review: January 2012 Date of Last Review: February 2007

Headache. Section 1. Migraine headache. Clinical presentation

Drug Class Review on Cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 Inhibitors and Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)

Is Yoga an Effective Treatment for Reducing the Frequency of Episodic Migraine?

Case Presentation. Case Presentation. Case Presentation. Truths about Headaches (2017) Most headaches were muscle-tension headaches

Migraine Diagnosis and Treatment: Results From the American Migraine Study II

Migraine Types and Triggering Factors in Children

ISSN doi: /head VC 2015 American Headache Society Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Rizatriptan in the treatment of migraine

Maternity. Migraine in pregnancy Information for women

Drug Therapy Guidelines

An Overview of MOH. ALAN M. Rapoport, M.D. Clinical Professor of Neurology The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles, California

5 HT receptor agonists (triptans) and Pediatric Migraine Critically Appraised Topic (CAT)

THE WOMAN WHO COULD NOT DECIDE WHICH MEDICATION TO TAKE

Abstract The aim of this prospective,

Andrew J. Dowson Hélène Massiou Sheena K. Aurora

Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: second edition

Specific Care Question : Question Originator: Plain Language Summary from The Office of Evidence Based Practice: Conditional Recommendation

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

MEASURE #3: PREVENTIVE MIGRAINE MEDICATION PRESCRIBED Headache

RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN (RMP) PUBLIC SUMMARY ETORICOXIB ORION (ETORICOXIB) 30 MG, 60 MG, 90 MG & 120 MG FILM-COATED TABLET DATE: , VERSION 1.

Submission for. Reclassification from

Evaluating the triptans

Migraine Migraine Age Specific Prevalence in the United States. Headache International Headache Society Classification

Medication For Migraine Chart: Table 1: Acute Treatment when the attack begins

OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY

Vestibular Migraine. Information for patients and carers. Department of Neurology and Otolaryngology Aberdeen Royal Infirmary

Reviews/Evaluations. Medication-Overuse Headache

Transcription:

J Headache Pain (2007) 8:175 179 DOI 10.1007/s10194-007-0386-7 ORIGINAL Usha Kant Misra Jayantee Kalita Rama Kant Yadav Rizatriptan vs. ibuprofen in migraine: a randomised placebo-controlled trial Received: 11 April 2007 Accepted in revised form: 10 May 2007 Published online: 11 June 2007 U. K. Misra ( ) J. Kalita R.K. Yadav Department of Neurology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareily Road, Lucknow 226014, India e-mail: ukmisra@sgpgi.ac.in Tel.: +91-0522-2668004-8 ext. 2167 Fax: +91-0522-2668017 Abstract The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of rizatriptan and ibuprofen in migraine. The study was a randomised placebo-controlled trial in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Migraine patients with <8 attacks/months were included. One hundred and fifty-five migraine patients were randomised to rizatriptan 10 mg (53), ibuprofen 400 mg (52) and placebo (50). Efficacy was assessed by headache relief, and headache freedom at 2 h and 24 h. Two-hour headache relief was noted in 73% in rizatriptan, 53.8% in ibuprofen and 8% in placebo groups. Headache freedom was achieved in 37.7% in rizatriptan, 30.8% in ibuprofen and 2% in placebo groups. Rizatriptan was superior to ibuprofen and placebo in relieving headache at 2 h but not at 24 h. Side effects were noted in 9 patients in rizatriptan, 8 in ibuprofen and 3 in placebo, all of which were nonsignificant. Rizatriptan and ibuprofen are superior to placebo. Rizatriptan is superior to ibuprofen in relieving headache, associated symptoms and functional disability. Keywords Migraine Rizatriptan Acute attack Randomised controlled trial Treatment Introduction For treating acute migraine attacks, a number of drugs are used, including ergot alkaloids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), acetaminophen and triptans. Both Cox I and Cox II inhibitors have been investigated and found to be effective in migraine [1, 2], however rofecoxib has been withdrawn due to toxicity [3]. The reported efficacy of NSAIDS is 42% 72% [1, 4 7]. NSAIDS are in use because of their predictable response, low cost and well known side-effect profile. Triptans are a new class of drugs, which are 5HT1B-D agonists, quick acting and have low gastrointestinal toxicity. Amongst the triptans, oral rizatriptan has been reported to be more effective than sumatriptan, naratriptan and zolmitriptan [8]. In a cross-over study, rizatriptan was found to be superior to ergotamine and caffeine combination in relieving acute migraine attack [9]. The decision to choose a new drug is based not only on its efficacy compared to placebo but also its relative advantage over other available drugs. There is no study comparing rizatriptan with other NSAIDS. We therefore report the results of a randomised placebo-controlled trial (RCT) comparing rizatriptan with ibuprofen and placebo.

176 Subjects and methods This study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital during 2004 2006 and was duly approved by the local ethics committee. The patients were recruited from out patient service of the Neurology Department. Migraine patients above the age of 12 years were diagnosed on the basis of International Headache Society criteria [10]. Patients with mild (grade I) headache, headache with recurrent vomiting or more than 8 attacks per month, pregnant or lactating mothers, and those on oral contraceptives, or with a history of drug allergy, intractable hypertension, renal or hepatic failure, coronary artery disease, pulmonary, psychiatric or other neurological diseases were excluded. The patients were subjected to detailed medical history and physical examination as per fixed protocol. The patients were randomised into rizatriptan, ibuprofen and placebo using computer-generated random numbers. Randomisation was done by one investigator and evaluation by another. The patients were asked to record severity of headache, functional disability and associated symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, phonophobia, photophobia and allodynia before and 2 h after medication in a headache diary. Relapse of headache within 24 h was also noted. Headache relapse was defined as occurrence of moderate to severe headache within 24 h of dosing in patients who initially had relief of pain 2 h after medication. The severity of headache was graded on a 0 III scale (0=normal, grade I=mild, grade II=moderate and grade III=severe). Functional disability was graded as 0=normal, I=daily activity mildly impaired, II=daily activity moderately impaired, III=daily activity severely impaired and IV=inability to perform daily activities requiring bed rest [8]. The severity of associated symptoms of nausea, vomiting, photophobia and phonophobia were also graded on a 0 III scale: 0=normal, I=mild, II=moderate, III=severe. The patients were advised to take study medication (rizatriptan 10 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg or placebo) if the headache was moderate to severe provided in identical packets. Rescue medication piroxicam 20 mg was advised if moderate to severe headache persisted 2 h after initial medication. The patients were subjected to blood counts, urinalysis, blood sugar, serum creatinine, bilirubin, serum transaminases and electrocardiogram. Any side effect up to 24 h after medication was recorded. Efficacy measurement Efficacy of drug was evaluated at the 1-month visit or after 2 or more attacks, which were documented in the headache diary. The primary end-point was percentage of patients having pain relief at 2 h. Pain relief was considered if severity of headache was reduced to grade I or 0. The secondary end-point was percentage of patients with relief of associated symptoms, functional disability at 2 h and pain freedom at 24 h. Sample size calculation and statistics The calculated sample size was 156, taking α=0.05, critical difference between the drugs 15% and standard deviation (SD) 2. The power of test as evaluated for Mann-Whitney U-test was 78.62%. The baseline characteristics between groups were compared by independent t, χ 2 and Fisher s exact tests. The efficacy of drugs between the groups was analysed by Mann Whitney U-test and within the same group by Wilcoxon signed ranked test. The numbers of patients with headache relief at 2 h and relapse within 24 h were compared by χ 2 test. Results During the study period 174 migraine patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Nine patients were excluded due to lack of consent. Fifty-seven patients were randomised to rizatriptan, 55 to ibuprofen and 53 to placebo. Four patients in rizatriptan and 3 each in ibuprofen and placebo were lost from (Fig. 1). Our results therefore are based on 155 migraine patients whose age ranged between 16 and 58 (mean 30.5) years, 106 of whom were females. All the patients had migraine without aura. The duration of migraine ranged between 6 and 260 (mean 63.2) months. The mean frequency of migraine attacks was 4.4 (range 2 8) per month. Eighty-seven patients had moderate and 68 severe headache. The mean headache score was 2.44±0.50, associated symptoms score 2.08±0.29 and functional disability score 2.36±0.73. Fifty-three patients were randomised to rizatriptan, 52 ibuprofen and 50 placebo groups. The demographic and clinical variables of these groups were not significantly different (Table 1). Efficacy Two-hour headache relief was achieved by rizatriptan in 39 (73%), ibuprofen in 28 (53.8%) and placebo in 4 (8%) patients. Two-hour headache freedom was achieved by rizatriptan in 20 (37.7%), ibuprofen in 16 (30.8%) and placebo in 1 (2%) patients. Rizatriptan was significantly better than ibuprofen in relieving headache (p=0.0001) but not in achieving pain freedom (p=0.38). The headache score at 2 h compared to baseline was significantly greater in rizatriptan (p=0.0001) and ibuprofen (p=0.0001). Functional disability and associated symptoms were also significantly reduced at 2 h in both rizatriptan and ibuprofen groups. However in the placebo group, headache severity and functional disability were significantly increased at 2 h (Table 2). Comparing the efficacy between the groups revealed significant improvement in headache score, associated symp-

177 174 patients screened 9 Patients excluded (Informed consent not given) 165 patients randomized 57 patients rizatriptan 10 mg 55 patients ibuprofen 400 mg 53 patients placebo 4 patients 3 patients 3 patients rizatriptan 10 mg ibuprofen 400 mg placebo Fig. 1 Flow chart showing randomization of migraine patients Table 1 The comparison of demographic and clinical variables of migraine patients between study and control groups, which were not significant Variables Rizatriptan (n=53) Ibuprofen (n=52) Control (n=50) Age (yrs) 29.15±8.7 30.5±10.6 31.78±9.9 Females 36 38 40 Number of attacks 4.6±.13 4.2±1.2 4.5±1.4 Duration (months) 60.8±60.7 65.7±68.3 63.1±57.0 Family history 15 17 8 Nausea 53 51 43 Vomiting 47 46 46 Photophobia 53 52 50 Phonophobia 53 52 50 Functional disability I 3 10 4 II 28 21 22 III 21 17 23 IV 1 4 1 Severity of headache Moderate 28 28 31 Severe 25 24 19 Duration of attack (hours) 17.0±10.3 13.6±8.8 14.8±10.9

178 toms and functional disability both in rizatriptan and ibuprofen compared to placebo. However the difference between rizatriptan and ibuprofen was not significant (p=0.09). Rizatriptan resulted in significant relief in associated symptoms and functional disability and insignificant improvement in headache score compared to ibuprofen (Table 3). Twenty-four-hour headache relapse in the patients who responded at 2 h was noted in 6 (15.38%) in rizatriptan, 5 (17.85%) in ibuprofen and 1 (25%) in placebo groups. This difference was not significant (p=0.87). A significantly higher number of patients needed rescue medication (piroxicam 20 mg dispersible) in the placebo group (46) compared to the rizatriptan (14) and ibuprofen (24 patients; p<0.0001) groups. Requirement of rescue medication was also significantly higher in ibuprofen compared to rizatriptan (p=0.04). In our study 20 patients developed side effects: 9 in rizatriptan (palpitation 6, somnolence 2 and gastric discomfort 1), 8 in ibuprofen (gastric discomfort in all) and 3 in the placebo group (gastric discomfort in all). The side effects were mild to moderate and could be easily controlled without any protocol violation. Discussion Our study reveals that rizatriptan and ibuprofen were superior to placebo in relieving pain, associated symptoms and functional disability at 2 h compared to placebo. These are in agreement with the earlier studies in which rizatriptan 10 mg was superior to placebo [11]. Efficacy of rizatriptan in relieving headache has been reported to be from 52% to 67.3% and 2-h pain freedom 26% to 49%. In our study rizatriptan resulted in headache relief in 73% and headache freedom in 37.7% patients. Ibuprofen resulted in headache relief in 53.8% and Table 2 Efficacy of rizatriptan, ibuprofen and placebo in patients with migraine Drugs Before treatment 2 hour after treatment Z value p (mean±sd) (mean±sd) Rizatriptan (53) Headache score 2.47±0.50 1.02±1.03 5.85 0.0001 Functional disability score 2.38±0.63 1.04±0.98 5.75 0.0001 Associated symptom score 2.13±0.34 0.85±0.82 6.25 0.0001 Ibuprofen (52) Headache score 2.44±0.54 1.35±1.14 5.03 0.0001 Functional disability score 2.29±0.87 1.27±1.10 5.57 0.0001 Associated symptom score 2.06±0.24 1.13±0.79 5.48 0.0001 Placebo (50) Headache score 2.38±0.49 2.42±0.67 2.07 0.04 Functional disability score 2.22±0.68 2.28±0.70 2.33 0.02 Associated symptom score 2.04±0.29 1.70±0.71 3.00 0.0003 Table 3 Comparison of efficacy of rizatriptan, ibuprofen and placebo in acute migraine attack Difference in score Rizatriptan Vs Ibuprofen Rizatriptan Vs placebo Ibuprofen Vs placebo Headache 1.45±0.93 vs 1.12±1.08 1.45±0.93 vs 0.16±0.51 1.12±1.08 vs 0.16±0.51 Z/p value 1.69/0.09 6.68/0.0001 5.10/0.0001 Associated symptoms 1.25±0.83 vs 0.90±0.85 1.25±0.83 vs 0.26±0.66 0.90±0.85 vs 0.26±0.66 Z/p value 2.06/0.04 5.82/0.0001 4.33/0.0001 Functional disability 1.34±0.90 vs 0.98±0.94 1.34±0.90 vs 0.14±0.40 0.98±0.94 vs 0.14±0.40 Z/p value 21.3/0.03 6.78/0.0001 5.38/0.0001

179 headache freedom in 30.8% patients. The efficacy of ibuprofen in earlier studies has been reported to be 42% 70% [4, 7, 12, 13]. On comparing with ibuprofen, rizatriptan was better in relieving pain, associated symptoms and functional disability at 2 h. Rizatriptan has been compared with other triptans and is reported to be superior to sumatriptan, zolmitriptan and naratriptan in 2-h pain relief and 24-h headache freedom [8]. Acetaminophen, aspirin and NSAIDS in migraine have been found to be effective and well tolerated in adults and children [4, 14]. In childhood migraine, ibuprofen has been found to be superior to acetaminophen [4]. There is however no study comparing the relative efficacy of rizatriptan and NSAIDS. Triptans, especially sumatriptan, have been compared with naproxen, indomethacin, aspirin and ibuprofen [14 16]. In an RCT, ibuprofen resulted in headache relief in 62.5%, sumatriptan in 55.8% and headache freedom was 33.2% and 37.1% patients respectively, which were not significant [14]. In our study, rizatriptan resulted in significant pain relief, reduction in associated symptoms and functional disability compared to ibuprofen. Gastrointestinal side effects were more common with ibuprofen and palpitations with rizatriptan; however, the side effects were not severe enough to warrant discontinuation in any patient. Our study is limited by the relatively small number of patients. As the study was conducted in a single centre, there is homogeneity in patient selection and low inter-rater variability. Efforts were made to blind the randomising and evaluating investigators and medication was provided in identical packets to eliminate bias. Both rizatriptan and ibuprofen are superior to placebo in aborting acute migraine attack. Rizatriptan 10 mg is superior to ibuprofen in relieving headache, associated symptoms and functional disability. References 1. Misra UK, Jose M, Kalita J (2004) Rofecoxib versus ibuprofen for acute treatment of migraine: a randomised placebo controlled trial. Postgrad Med J 80:720 723 2. Silberstein SD (2000) Practice parameter: evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 55:754 762 3. Rocha JL, Fernandez-Alonso J (2001) Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis associated with the selective COX-2 enzyme inhibitor, rofecoxib. Lancet 357:1946 1947 4. Hamalainen ML, Hoppu K, Valkeila E, Santavuori P (1997) Ibuprofen or acetaminophen for the acute treatment of migraine in children: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Neurology 48:103 107 5. Havaka-Kanniainen H (1989) Treatment of acute migraine attack: ibuprofen and placebo compared. Headache 29:507 509 6. Caklwell J, Holt P (1998) MK 0966, a specific COX 2 inhibitor, has clinical efficacy comparable to diclofenac in the treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) in a 26 week control trial. Arthritis Rheum 41:S83 7. Codispoti JR, Prior MJ, Fu M et al (2001) Efficacy of nonprescription doses of ibuprofen for treating migraine headache: a randomized controlled trial. Headache 41:665 679 8. Adelman JU, Lipton RB, Ferrari MD et al (2001) Comparison of rizatriptan and other triptans on stringent measures of efficacy. Neurology 57:1377 1383 9. Christie S, Gobel H, Mateos V et al Rizatriptan-Ergotamine/Caffeine Preference Study Group (2003) Crossover comparison of efficacy and preference for rizatriptan 10 mg versus ergotamine/caffeine in migraine. Eur Neurol 49:20 29 10. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. (1988) Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalalgia 7[Suppl 7]:1 96 11. Kramer MS, Matzura-Wolfe D, Polis A et al (1998) A placebo-controlled crossover study of rizatriptan in the treatment of multiple migraine attacks. Rizatriptan Multiple Attack Study Group. Neurology 51:773 781 12. Kolster R, Nestvold K, Vilming ST (1992) A double blind study of ibuprofen versus placebo in the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Cephalalgia 12:169 171 13. Kellstein DE, Lipton RB, Geetha R et al (2000) Evaluation of a novel solubilized formulation of ibuprofen in the treatment of migraine headache: a randomized double blind, placebo-controlled, dose ranging study. Cephalalgia 20:233 243 14. Diener HC, Bussone G, de Liano H et al (2004) EMSASI Study Group. Placebo-controlled comparison of effervescent acetylsalicylic acid, sumatriptan and ibuprofen in the treatment of migraine attacks. Cephalalgia 24:947 954 15. Smith TR, Sunshine A, Stark SR et al (2005) Sumatriptan and naproxen sodium for the acute treatment of migraine. Headache 45:983 991 16. Geraud G, Compagnon A, Rossi A COZAM Study Group (2002) Zolmitriptan versus a combination of acetylsalicylic acid and metoclopramide in the acute oral treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomised, three-attack study. Eur Neurol 47:88 98