Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline Very Low-/Low-Risk Disease

Similar documents
Understanding the risk of recurrence after primary treatment for prostate cancer. Aditya Bagrodia, MD

Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline High-Risk Disease

Consensus and Controversies in Cancer of Prostate BASIS FOR FURHTER STUDIES. Luis A. Linares MD FACRO Medical Director

Prostate MRI: Who needs it?

Prostate Cancer: 2010 Guidelines Update

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

High Intensity Focused Ultrasounds for the treatment of Prostate Cancers Clinical update November D. Maruzzi - L. Ruggera

Author's Accepted Manuscript

PSMA PET in patients with prostate cancer

NICE BULLETIN Diagnosis & treatment of prostate cancer

2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

MR-US Fusion Guided Biopsy: Is it fulfilling expectations?

One Stop Prostate Biopsy Protocol Author Consultation Date Approved

Localized Prostate Cancer Have we finally got it right? Shingai Mutambirwa Professor & Chair-Division Urology DGMAH & SMU Pretoria SOUTH AFRICA

The Royal Marsden. Prostate case study. Presented by Mr Alan Thompson Consultant Urological Surgeon

Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: Risk Stratification, Shared Decision Making, and Care Options

Case Discussions: Prostate Cancer

State-of-the-art: vision on the future. Urology

Helping you make better-informed decisions 1-5

Multiparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate after Treatment of Prostate Cancer

Best Papers. F. Fusco

Clinical Case Conference

Effective Date: 11/1/2018 Section: SUR Policy No: 420 Medical Policy Committee Approved Date: 8/18; 9/18

Prostate Cancer. David Wilkinson MD Gulfshore Urology

Screening for Prostate Cancer with the Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Test: Recommendations 2014

Prostate Cancer Case Study 1. Medical Student Case-Based Learning

Prostate MRI for local staging and surgical planning in prostate cancer

THE UROLOGY GROUP

Date of preparation- January 2018 Janssen Biotech, Inc /18 em Reporter s guide to. prostate cancer

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 21 November 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta546

GUIDELINES ON PROSTATE CANCER

Prostate Biopsy. Prostate Biopsy. We canʼt go backwards: Screening has helped!

Prostate Cancer Incidence

Open clinical uro-oncology trials in Canada

PSA test. PSA testing is not usually recommended for asymptomatic men with < 10 years life expectancy Before having a PSA test men should not have:

Open clinical uro-oncology trials in Canada Eric Winquist, MD, George Rodrigues, MD

Guidelines for the Management of Prostate Cancer West Midlands Expert Advisory Group for Urological Cancer

PROSTATE CANCER CONTENT CREATED BY. Learn more at

Introduction. American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved.

Date Modified: May 29, Clinical Quality Measures for PQRS

Prostate cancer smart screening, precision diagnosis, personalised treatment'

The Selenium and Vitamin E Prevention Trial

Radical prostate surgery?

Navigating the Stream: Prostate Cancer and Early Detection. Ifeanyi Ani, M.D. TPMG Urology Newport News

ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE OR WATCHFUL WAITING

Prostate Overview Quiz

Measuring the value of healthcare activities. Susan Rollason, Director of Finance and Strategy

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Draft Prostate Cancer Screening Recommendation (April 2017)

Prostate Cancer: from Beginning to End

When to worry, when to test?

ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR PROSTATE CANCER

Screening and Diagnosis Prostate Cancer

Trends in Prostate Cancer Bob Weir AVP Underwriting Research Canada Life Reinsurance

Anatomic Imaging of Prostate Cancer

Newer Aspects of Prostate Cancer Underwriting

PSA testing in New Zealand general practice

Prostate Cancer. Dr. Andres Wiernik 2017

A phase III trial of prostate alone vs. pelvic lymph node IMRT with or

PROSTATE CANCER SURVEILLANCE

Monique J. Roobol. Active Surveillance: update on Initiatives

Active Surveillance for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer

Personalized Therapy for Prostate Cancer due to Genetic Testings

New research in prostate brachytherapy

Date Modified: March 31, Clinical Quality Measures for PQRS

Detection & Risk Stratification for Early Stage Prostate Cancer

Factors Associated with Initial Treatment for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

The Paul Evans Memorial Lecture Functional radiotherapy targeting using focused dose escalation. Roberto Alonzi Mount Vernon Cancer Centre

Delivering stratified follow-up in primary care for Prostate Cancer Patients - The NCL Approach. Dr Elizabeth Babatunde Macmillan GP

Updates in Prostate Cancer Treatment 2018

PROSTATE CANCER Amit Gupta MD MPH

Outcomes With "Watchful Waiting" in Prostate Cancer in US Now So Good, Active Treatment May Not Be Better

MRI in the Enhanced Detection of Prostate Cancer: What Urologists Need to Know

BLADDER PROSTATE PENIS TESTICLES BE YO ND YO UR CA NC ER

Exploitation of Epigenetic Changes to Distinguish Benign from Malignant Prostate Biopsies

10/2/2018 OBJECTIVES PROSTATE HEALTH BACKGROUND THE PROSTATE HEALTH INDEX PHI*: BETTER PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION

Prostate Cancer: Screening, Treatment, and Survivorship

Corporate Medical Policy

Conceptual basis for active surveillance

S Crouzet, O Rouvière, JY Chapelon, F Mege, X martin, A Gelet

18-Oct-16. Take home messages. An update for GPs on modern radiation therapy & hormones for prostate cancer. Session plan

Cancer. Description. Section: Surgery Effective Date: October 15, 2016 Subsection: Original Policy Date: September 9, 2011 Subject:

PSA Screening and Prostate Cancer. Rishi Modh, MD

The Changing Landscape of Prostate Cancer

AllinaHealthSystems 1

ADVICE TO PATIENTS REQUESTING PSA MEASUREMENT FREQUENTLY-ASKED QUESTIONS

Low risk. Objectives. Case-based question 1. Evidence-based utilization of imaging in prostate cancer

Information for Patients. Prostate cancer. English

Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part II: Recommended Approaches and Details of Specific Care Options

Managing Prostate Cancer in General Practice

Irreversible Electroporation for the Treatment of Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Can men on AS be treated with testosterone?

Objectives. Prostate Cancer Screening and Surgical Management

Should A PSA threshold of 1.5 ng/ml be the threshold for further diagnostic tests?

CLINICAL TRIALS Open clinical uro-oncology trials in Canada George Rodrigues, MD, Eric Winquist, MD

Risk Migration ( ct2c=high)

Fellow GU Lecture Series, Prostate Cancer. Asit Paul, MD, PhD 02/20/2018

Prostate Cancer Screening. Eric Shreve, MD Bend Urology Associates

Prostate Cancer MRI. Accurate Diagnosis and Treatment. PSA to Prostate MRI. for patients and curious doctors

Cytoreductive Radical Prostatectomy for de Novo Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Transcription:

Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline Very Low-/Low-Risk Disease Jeffrey A. Cadeddu, MD Professor, Department of Urology UT Southwestern Medical Center Vice-Chair, AUA/ASTRO/SUO LCaP Guidelines Panel

DISCLOSURES Jeffrey A. Cadeddu, MD Titan Medical Inc: Investment Interest Transenterix: Investment Interest Levita Magnetics: Consultant or Advisor, Scientific Study or Trial

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW A comprehensive literature search was performed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) January 1, 2007 through March 7, 2014 Supplemented in August 2015 and August 2016 This formed the basis for Strong, Moderate, and Conditional Recommendations with additional information provided as Expert Opinion or Clinical Principle.

METHODOLOGY A B C Well conducted RCT s Exceptional observational studies RCT s and/or observational studies with some weaknesses Observational studies that are inconsistent -difficult to interpret Faraday 2009

GUIDELINE OVERVIEW Guideline Statements (Total = 68 Statements) I. Shared Decision Making (5 Statements) II. III. IV. Care Options by Cancer Severity/Risk Group I. Very Low-/Low-Risk (9 Statements) II. Intermediate-Risk (7 Statements) III. High-Risk (6 Statements) Recommended Approaches and Detail Specific Care Options I. Active Surveillance (6 Statements) II. Prostatectomy (8 Statements) III. Radiotherapy (8 Statements) IV. Whole Gland Cryosurgery (7 Statements) V. HIFU and Focal Therapy (4 Statements) Outcome Expectations and Management (8 Statements)

RISK STRATIFICATION The core of the Panel s risk-grouping is the original low-, intermediate-, and high-risk grouping as proposed by D Amico et al. We further augmented the D Amico criteria by subcategorizing the low-risk group into very low- and lowrisk based on criteria analogous to that first proposed by Epstein. Prostate Cancer Severity Amount of Prostate Cancer on Biopsy PSA (ng/ml); PSAD Clin Stage (DRE) Pathology Grade Very Low Risk <1/3 of cores; <50% per core <10; <0.15 Low Risk Any <10; any psad T1-T2a Gleason score <6 (Grade Group 1) D Amico 1998, Epstein 1994

GUIDELINE STATEMENTS Staging in Asymptomatic Very Low-/Low-Risk Patients Clinicians should not perform abdomino-pelvic CT or routine bone scans (Strong Recommendation; Evidence Level C)

GUIDELINE STATEMENTS Active Surveillance- Very Low-Risk Clinicians should recommend active surveillance as the best available care option (Strong Recommendation; Evidence Level A) Active Surveillance- Low-Risk Clinicians should recommend active surveillance as the preferable care option (Moderate Recommendation; Evidence Level B) Clinicians may offer definitive treatment (i.e. radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) to select patients who may have a high probability of progression (Conditional Recommendation; Evidence Level B)

GUIDELINE STATEMENTS Definitive Treatment for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Clinicians should not add ADT along with radiotherapy except to reduce prostate size for brachytherapy (Strong Recommendation; Evidence Level B) Clinicians should inform patients considering cryosurgery that side effects are considerable and survival benefit has not been shown compared to active surveillance (Conditional Recommendation; Evidence Level C) Clinicians should inform patients who are considering focal therapy or HIFU that these interventions are not standard care options because comparative outcome evidence is lacking (Expert Opinion/No RCT evidence)

Additional Statements GUIDELINE STATEMENTS Clinicians should recommend observation or watchful waiting for men with a life expectancy 5 years with low-risk localized prostate cancer (Strong Recommendation; Evidence Level B) Among most low-risk localized prostate cancer patients, tissue based genomic biomarkers have not shown a clear role in the selection of candidates for active surveillance (Expert Opinion)

CARE OPTION SUMMARY Evidence Level/ Recommendation Strength Prostate Cancer Severity/Aggressiveness Very Low Risk Low Risk A / Strong Active Surveillance NA B / Moderate NA Active Surveillance B / Conditional NA Radical Prostatectomy OR Radiotherapy C / Conditional NA Cryosurgery (whole gland) No evidence / clinical principle or expert opinion NA Focal Ablative Therapy OR HIFU