Smith & Nephew. R3 Cementless Cup

Similar documents
Smith & Nephew. Polarstem Cementless

Produced on: Licenced for use until: Corail Stem (Standard Offset Collared)

Produced on: Licenced for use until: Corail Stem (Standard Offset Non-Collared)

DePuy Corail Collared vs. Collarless (ex MoM)

DePuy Attune CR and Attune PS

DePuy Attune CR and Attune PS. Contents Recorded Usage in NJR Patient and Procedure Details Revision and Survivorship APPENDIX A Component List

DePuy Attune CR and Attune PS. Contents Recorded Usage in NJR Patient and Procedure Details Revision and Survivorship APPENDIX A Component List

REVISION. Zimmer Biomet All Trabecular Metal Cups vs. All non-tm cementless cups

PRIMARY. ConforMIS itotal G2 XE and itotal G2 (Bicondylar tray)

Automated Industry Report 824 Depuy Synthes Australia Attune PS Total Knee

Automated Industry Report 823 Depuy Synthes Australia Attune CR Total Knee

AOANJRR Automated Industry Report Depuy Synthes Australia Attune PS Total Knee Data Period: 1 September August 2018

National Joint Replacement Registry. Metal and Ceramic Bearing Surface in Total Conventional Hip Arthroplasty

2016 CELEBRATING 15 YEARS OF DATA REPORT NATIONAL JOINT REPLACEMENT REGISTRY. Metal and Ceramic Bearing Surface in Total Conventional Hip Arthroplasty

PUBLIC AND PATIENT GUIDE

National Joint Registry for England and Wales 3rd Annual Clinical Report

PUBLIC AND PATIENT GUIDE TO THE NJR S 11TH ANNUAL REPORT 2014

PUBLIC AND PATIENT GUIDE

Acetabular Cup System. Clinical Summary

Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 103: 54 59, 2013

Are You Living with. Hip Pain? MAKOplasty may be the right treatment option for you.

Total Hip Replacement. Find out why the Anterior Approach may be right for you.

2:12-cv VAR-LJM Doc # 1 Filed 08/02/12 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

PINNACLE Acetabular Cup System

)501( COPYRIGHT 2018 BY THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY

National Joint Replacement Registry. Outcomes of Classes No Longer Used Hip and Knee Arthroplasty SUPPLEMENTARY

CORAIL Hip System. Clinical Summary

DIRECT ANTERIOR APPROACH

Are there limits for a cementless short hip stem?

TITLE: Metal on Metal Total Hip Replacements or Hip Resurfacing for Adults: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness

ESC. Enhanced Stability Liners. Design Rationale & Surgical Technique

Impingement in THA. Georgi I. Wassilew. Orthopaedic Department, Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. C.

Informed Consent for HRA

National Joint Replacement Registry. Lay Summary 2015 Annual Report Hip and Knee Replacement

Scorpio NRG PS (cementless)/series 7000 (cementless) Total Knee Investigation

ACETABULAR CUP SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Trusted technology. Trusted performance. Supporting healthcare professionals

BRITISH HIP SOCIETY. Annual Scientific Meeting 2019 Nottingham, Concert Hall. Registration from with Refreshments

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence

Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of the Registry Data

A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY OF MEDIUM-TERM DATA FROM A NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY

AN ANALYSIS FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY FOR ENGLAND AND WALES

Bone Bangalore

BJR. Outcomes following revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris in non-metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients.

Bi-Polar 22.2mm & 28mm System - Operative technique

Appendix E-1 (Figures and Tables) Fig. E-1

Countrywise results of total hip replacement: An analysis of 438,733 hips based on the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database

Gender Solutions Patello-Femoral Joint System

Exeter. Designed for Anatomic Restoration. Clinical Evidence Education

Raising Transparency of Pricing for Total Hip and Total Knee Replacements: A National Pilot on Value for Money for the NHS in Orthopaedic Procurement

Optimizing function Maximizing survivorship Accelerating recovery

Functional Outcome following Primary and Revision Total Hip and Knee Replacement

GETTING IT RIGHT FIRST TIME National Professional Pilot

Map 48: Rate of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing procedures undertaken per population by PCT

CeramTec Medical Products. BIOLOX DUO Ceramic Bipolar System. Bone-sparing joint reconstruction with a maximum range of motion

R3 delta Ceramic Acetabular System PATIENT INFORMATION. Table of Contents

Original Date: December 2015 Page 1 of 8 FOR CMS (MEDICARE) MEMBERS ONLY

Optimum implant geometry

For Commercial products, please refer to the following policy: Preauthorization via Web-Based Tool for Procedures

Furlong H-A.C. THR System

Medical Products Division. BIOLOX DUO Ceramic Bipolar System. Bone-sparing joint reconstruction with a maximum range of motion

CAUTION Federal law (USA) restricts this device to sale, by or on the order of a physician.

Many fields are derived from the existing NJR. John Timperley MB ChB FRCS (Ed) DPhil (Oxon) Vice President British Hip Society

Hip Resurfacing.

Scan Bi-Polar 22/28. Operative Technique

FDA Safety Communication: Metal-on- Metal Hip Implants

Robotic-Arm Assisted Surgery

Vasu Pai D orth, MS, National Board [orth],mch, FRACS, FICMR Total Hip Arthroplasty

*smith&nephew. BIRMINGHAM HIP Resurfacing (BHR ) System Patient Information Revision 0

NJR 2009 NJR Activity 2008 Keith Tucker Survivorship Analysis Martyn Porter Outliers Paul Gregg Clinician Feedback Peter Howard

Total Hip Replacement. Find out why Total Hip Replacement may be right for you.

Informed Consent for HRA

YOUR TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT SURGERY STEPS TO RETURNING TO A LIFESTYLE YOU DESERVE

Ceramic Femoral Heads and Acetabular Cup Liners

2016 CELEBRATING 15 YEARS OF DATA REPORT NATIONAL JOINT REPLACEMENT REGISTRY. Outcomes of Classes No Longer Used Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

SUMMIT and DURALOC. Clinical Summary

American Joint Replacement Registry. Jeffrey P. Knezovich, CAE Executive Director ---- Caryn D. Etkin, PhD, MPH Director of Analytics

R/F. Can T-smart Tomosynthesis Improve Diagnostic Accuracy on THA Component Stability? 1. Abstract

WHAT IS THE BEST BONE FIXATION TYPE? 2/11/2011

YOUR TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT SURGERY

Gerald Friedl 1 ; Roman Radl 1 ; Peter Rehak 2, Reingard Aigner 3, and Reinhard Windhager 1

JRI Thompson Hemiarthroplasty

Case report: Pain L THR [ post THR 2 years; with history of trivial fall] Your Diagnosis?

Move Ahead with Confidence. Hip Replacement Solutions from DePuy Orthopaedics

RM Philosophy Innovation based on clinical evidence.

ANATOMIC TOTAL SHOULDER REPLACEMENT:

Total Hip Replacement

Patient Pain and Function Survey

TriboFit Hip System. Issue 3 - August 2013 English

COI. Consulting-TJO, United Institutional Support- Smith & Nephew, Acelity-KCI, Stryker, USMI

Commissioning Policy Individual Funding Request

DEPUY SYNTHES JOINT RECONSTRUCTION PATIENT EDUCATION SEMINAR

Your Pre-operative Guide

FLH183 04/08. Biomet UK Ltd Waterton Industrial Estate Bridgend, South Wales CF31 3XA, United Kingdom. Tel. +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0)

Shoulder Joint Replacement

Progeny Hip Stem. Surgical Protocol and Product Specifications

CAUTION: Ceramic liners are not approved for use in the United States.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE CEMENTED & PRESS-FIT UNIFIED INSTRUMENTATION INTRAOPERATIVE FLEXIBILITY PROVEN BIOMECHANICS

Transcription:

Implant Smith & Nephew Comprising PRIMARY hips implanted up to: 09 September 2018 NJR Database extract: 08 November 2018 Produced on: Licenced for use until: 18 November 2018 18 March 2019 Contents Recorded Usage in NJR Patient and Procedure Details Patient Reported Outcomes APPENDIX A Component List 2 3 4 12 15 This report has been produced by the National Joint Registry of England, Wales and Northern Ireland (NJR). It summarises usage and outcomes associated with the up to the specified dates. This analysis is based on data collected by the NJR and PROMs data collected by NHS Digital for thefollowing combinations of products: Acetabular components Femoral Components Any Femoral Components manufactured by Smith & Nephew Appendix A lists details of all components included in this report. This report is made available to Smith & Nephew under licence. Under this licence, Smith & Nephew is free to distribute this document, subject to the restrictions specified in the National Joint Registry Supplier Feedback Data Access and Use Code of Practice. Page 1

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Implant Usage Date of first recorded usage in the NJR: Date of last recorded usage in this dataset: Maximum implantation time: Mean implantation time: 27 March 2007 08 September 2018 11.4 years 3.2 years NJR Recorded Usage Totals Recorded in NJR Procedures Cumulative Total 22,030 Patients 20,053 Centres 126 Consultants 312 Implanting Surgeons 504 25000 Cumulative Procedures 600 Cumulative Surgeons and Centres 20000 500 15000 400 300 10000 200 5000 100 0 0 Procedures Centres Consultants Implanting Surgeons Current Outcome Pre- 2007 Year of implantation 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total % Death 0 1 10 38 63 80 110 185 147 86 67 39 7 833 3.8% Revised 0 5 13 16 11 21 31 35 43 55 24 31 11 296 1.3% Unrevised 0 6 52 277 511 872 1530 2282 2638 2893 3216 3682 2942 20901 94.9% Total 0 12 75 331 585 973 1671 2502 2828 3034 3307 3752 2960 22030 100% Page 2

Patient / Procedure Details Patient Details All NJR Cementless Cups All NJR hip replacement Total Procedures 22,030 678,283 1,070,534 Total Patients 20,053 582,437 912,154 Demographics Mean age 65.0 65.9 68.6 < 50 10.1% 8.5% 6.0% 50 59 19.5% 18.2% 13.7% 60 69 32.3% 32.7% 29.2% 70 79 28.9% 29.3% 34.6% 80 9.2% 11.2% 16.4% Median BMI 28 28 28 % BMI information available 74.8% 61.8% 59.7% Underweight ( BMI < 18.5) 0.6% 0.8% 0.9% Normal (18.5 BMI < 25) 18.1% 19.9% 20.8% Overweight (25 BMI < 30) 39.3% 39.5% 39.7% Obese I (30 BMI < 35) 27.3% 26.1% 25.7% Obese II (35 BMI < 40) 11.0% 10.1% 9.6% Obese III (BMI 40) 3.6% 3.5% 3.3% % Male 44.5% 43.8% 40.2% ASA Grades P1 - Fit and healthy 18.0% 19.1% 16.3% P2 - Mild disease not incapacitating 67.6% 67.3% 67.6% P3 - Incapacitating systemic disease 14.1% 13.2% 15.6% P4 / P5 0.3% 0.4% 0.6% Indications Osteoarthritis 91.88% 91.97% 91.72% Rheumatoid Arthritis 1.43% 1.28% 1.32% Avascular Necrosis 2.46% 2.66% 2.51% Fractured Neck of Femur 2.39% 2.72% 3.20% CDH/DDH 2.66% 2.07% 1.55% Other 1.55% 1.99% 2.13% Total of indications may exceed total number of implants, since more than one indication can be listed per case. Page 3

Reasons for Revision - All bearing types Reasons for revision of primary procedures in which the implant was used. Reason for Revision Revised Expected Revisions * p value Unexplained Pain 26 74.77 <0.001 Dislocation / Subluxation 69 77.80 0.358 Adverse Soft Tissue Reaction 24 53.06 <0.001 Infection 57 65.45 0.317 Aseptic Loosening - Stem 39 55.47 0.025 Aseptic Loosening - Socket 10 38.95 <0.001 Periprosthetic Fracture Stem 49 57.38 0.286 Periprosthetic Fracture Socket 3 7.77 0.099 Malalignment Stem 10 13.40 0.408 Malalignment Socket 14 26.38 0.013 Wear Of Acetabular Component 13 13.35 1 Lysis Stem 3 8.90 0.042 Lysis Socket 1 7.89 0.006 Implant Fracture Stem 6 6.08 1 Implant Fracture Socket 1 6.78 0.017 Implant Fracture Head 1 2.80 0.536 Dissociation of Liner 3 7.65 0.098 Other / reason not recorded 17 29.23 0.019 Total Revised 296 433.44 <0.001 * Based on All NJR Cementless Cups adjusted for agegroup, multiple reasons may be listed for one revision procedure gender, and indications Significantly better, p < 0.001 Significantly better, p < 0.05 Significantly worse p < 0.05 Significantly worse p < 0.001 Components Revised Number of procedures R3 Cementless Cup All other Cementless Cups in NJR Femoral only 99 33% 21% Acetabular only 47 16% 26% Both femoral and acetabular 79 27% 44% Neither femoral nor acetabular revision recorded * 71 24% 9% * includes isolated head and/or liner exchange Page 4

Reasons for Revision - excluding Metal on Metal Reasons for revision of non-mom primary procedures in which the implant was used. Reason for Revision Revised Expected Revisions * p value Unexplained Pain 21 40.22 0.001 Dislocation / Subluxation 66 78.53 0.169 Adverse Soft Tissue Reaction 6 9.31 0.404 Infection 53 63.81 0.182 Aseptic Loosening - Stem 38 48.90 0.128 Aseptic Loosening - Socket 9 25.16 <0.001 Periprosthetic Fracture Stem 48 50.66 0.776 Periprosthetic Fracture Socket 3 7.30 0.13 Malalignment Stem 10 12.38 0.663 Malalignment Socket 12 22.16 0.03 Wear Of Acetabular Component 12 11.71 0.882 Lysis Stem 3 5.11 0.501 Lysis Socket 1 3.77 0.195 Implant Fracture Stem 6 5.20 0.655 Implant Fracture Socket 0 7.69 <0.001 Implant Fracture Head 1 2.36 0.735 Dissociation of Liner 3 7.86 0.099 Other / reason not recorded 13 18.05 0.281 Total Revised 263 338.48 <0.001 * Based on All NJR Cementless Cups (excluding metal on multiple reasons may be listed for one revision procedure metal), adjusted for agegroup, gender, and indications Significantly better, p < 0.001 Significantly better, p < 0.05 Significantly worse p < 0.05 Significantly worse p < 0.001 Components Revised Number of R3 Cementless All other Cementless Cups procedures Cup in NJR Femoral only 98 37% 30% Acetabular only 40 15% 25% Both femoral and acetabular 69 26% 34% Neither femoral nor acetabular revision recorded * 56 21% 11% Page 5

Endpoint: All reasons for revision. All Bearing types 10.0% 9.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Implantation time / years 95% confidence interval 95% confidence interval All other Cementless Cups in NJR Cox Proportional Hazards model for revision risk ratio of / All other Cementless Cups in NJR, with endpoint as any revision. Adjustment Hazard Ratio (95% CI) p- value All bearings. Unadjusted. 0.69 (0.62-0.77) <0.001 All bearings. Adjusted for age, gender, 0.88 year cohort and indications. (0.78-0.99) 0.032 Page 6

7.0% Endpoint: All reasons for revision. Excluding Metal-on-Metal 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Implantation time / years 95% confidence interval 95% confidence interval All other Cementless Cups in NJR Cox Proportional Hazards model for revision risk ratio of / All other Cementless Cups in NJR, with endpoint as any revision. Adjustment Hazard Ratio (95% CI) p- value Excluding MoM, Unadjusted. 0.79 (0.70-0.89) <0.001 Excluding MoM. Adjusted for age, 0.83 gender, year cohort and indications. (0.73-0.94) 0.003 Page 7

8.0% Endpoint: Acetabular Revision. All Bearing types 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Implantation time / years 95% confidence interval 95% confidence interval All other Cementless Cups in NJR Cox Proportional Hazards model for revision risk ratio of / all other All other Cementless Cups in NJR, with endpoint as Acetabular revision. Adjustment Hazard Ratio (95% CI) p- value All bearings. Unadjusted. 0.45 (0.38-0.54) <0.001 All bearings. Adjusted for age, gender, 0.65 year cohort and indications. (0.55-0.78) <0.001 Page 8

Endpoint: Acetabular Revision. Excluding Metal-on-Metal 4.5% 4.0% 3.5% 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Implantation time / years 95% confidence interval 95% confidence interval All other Cementless Cups in NJR Cox Proportional Hazards model for revision risk ratio of / All other Cementless Cups in NJR, with endpoint as Acetabular revision. Adjustment Hazard Ratio (95% CI) p- value Excluding MoM, Unadjusted 0.57 (0.47-0.68) <0.001 Excluding MoM. Adjusted for age, 0.63 gender, year cohort and indications. (0.52-0.76) <0.001 Page 9

Endpoint: All revisions All Bearing types Excluding Metal on Metal Bearings Period /years At Risk All NJR Cementless Cups All THR At Risk All NJR Cementless Cups All THR 0 22,030 - - - 21,891 - - - 1 17,469 0.8% (0.7% - 0.9%) 0.9% (0.9% - 0.9%) 0.8% (0.8% - 0.8%) 17,336 0.8% (0.7% - 0.9%) 0.9% (0.9% - 0.9%) 0.8% (0.7% - 0.8%) 2 13,805 1.1% (0.9% - 1.2%) 1.3% (1.3% - 1.4%) 1.2% (1.1% - 1.2%) 13,677 1.0% (0.9% - 1.2%) 1.2% (1.2% - 1.3%) 1.1% (1.1% - 1.1%) 3 10,435 1.3% (1.1% - 1.4%) 1.7% (1.7% - 1.8%) 1.5% (1.5% - 1.5%) 10,311 1.2% (1.1% - 1.4%) 1.5% (1.5% - 1.6%) 1.4% (1.4% - 1.4%) 4 7,614 1.4% (1.2% - 1.6%) 2.2% (2.1% - 2.2%) 1.9% (1.9% - 1.9%) 7,497 1.3% (1.1% - 1.5%) 1.8% (1.8% - 1.8%) 1.6% (1.6% - 1.6%) 5 4,855 1.7% (1.5% - 1.9%) 2.7% (2.6% - 2.7%) 2.3% (2.3% - 2.3%) 4,742 1.6% (1.4% - 1.8%) 2.0% (2.0% - 2.1%) 1.9% (1.8% - 1.9%) 6 2,780 2.0% (1.7% - 2.3%) 3.3% (3.2% - 3.3%) 2.7% (2.7% - 2.8%) 2,672 1.7% (1.5% - 2.0%) 2.3% (2.3% - 2.3%) 2.1% (2.1% - 2.2%) 7 1,412 2.5% (2.1% - 3.0%) 3.9% (3.8% - 3.9%) 3.2% (3.2% - 3.3%) 1,315 2.0% (1.7% - 2.4%) 2.6% (2.5% - 2.6%) 2.4% (2.3% - 2.4%) 8 677 3.0% (2.5% - 3.6%) 4.5% (4.5% - 4.6%) 3.7% (3.7% - 3.8%) 591 2.2% (1.8% - 2.8%) 2.9% (2.8% - 2.9%) 2.7% (2.6% - 2.7%) 9 226 3.5% (2.7% - 4.5%) 5.2% (5.1% - 5.3%) 4.3% (4.2% - 4.3%) 177 2.2% (1.8% - 3.2%) 3.2% (3.1% - 3.3%) 3.0% (3.0% - 3.1%) 10 ( - ) 5.9% (5.8% - 6.0%) 4.8% (4.8% - 4.9%) ( - ) 3.6% (3.5% - 3.7%) 3.4% (3.3% - 3.4%) 11 ( - ) 6.6% (6.5% - 6.7%) 5.4% (5.3% - 5.5%) ( - ) 4.0% (3.9% - 4.1%) 3.8% (3.8% - 3.9%) 12 ( - ) 7.3% (7.1% - 7.4%) 6.0% (5.9% - 6.1%) ( - ) 4.4% (4.3% - 4.6%) 4.3% (4.2% - 4.4%) 13 ( - ) 7.9% (7.7% - 8.0%) 6.6% (6.5% - 6.7%) ( - ) 4.9% (4.8% - 5.1%) 4.8% (4.7% - 4.9%) 14 ( - ) 8.6% (8.4% - 8.8%) 7.2% (7.0% - 7.3%) ( - ) 5.5% (5.2% - 5.7%) 5.2% (5.1% - 5.4%) 15 ( - ) 9.4% (9.1% - 9.7%) 7.9% (7.6% - 8.1%) ( - ) ( - ) 6.0% (5.7% - 6.2%) Cumulative revision rate with 95% confidence intervals Rate is only reported for times where more than 40 remain at risk Page 10

Endpoint: Acetabular Revision All Bearing types Excluding Metal on Metal Bearings Period /years At Risk All NJR Cementless Cups All THR At Risk All NJR Cementless Cups All THR 0 22,030 - - - 21,891 - - - 1 17,469 0.3% (0.3% - 0.4%) 0.5% (0.5% - 0.5%) 0.5% (0.4% - 0.5%) 17,336 0.3% (0.2% - 0.4%) 0.5% (0.5% - 0.5%) 0.4% (0.4% - 0.4%) 2 13,805 0.4% (0.3% - 0.5%) 0.8% (0.8% - 0.8%) 0.7% (0.7% - 0.7%) 13,677 0.4% (0.3% - 0.5%) 0.7% (0.7% - 0.7%) 0.7% (0.6% - 0.7%) 3 10,435 0.5% (0.4% - 0.6%) 1.1% (1.1% - 1.1%) 1.0% (1.0% - 1.0%) 10,311 0.5% (0.4% - 0.6%) 0.9% (0.9% - 0.9%) 0.9% (0.8% - 0.9%) 4 7,614 0.6% (0.5% - 0.7%) 1.4% (1.4% - 1.4%) 1.3% (1.2% - 1.3%) 7,497 0.5% (0.4% - 0.7%) 1.0% (1.0% - 1.1%) 1.0% (1.0% - 1.0%) 5 4,855 0.8% (0.6% - 0.9%) 1.8% (1.8% - 1.8%) 1.6% (1.5% - 1.6%) 4,742 0.7% (0.5% - 0.8%) 1.2% (1.2% - 1.2%) 1.2% (1.2% - 1.2%) 6 2,780 0.9% (0.7% - 1.1%) 2.3% (2.2% - 2.3%) 1.9% (1.9% - 2.0%) 2,672 0.8% (0.6% - 1.0%) 1.3% (1.3% - 1.4%) 1.4% (1.3% - 1.4%) 7 1,412 1.2% (1.0% - 1.6%) 2.8% (2.7% - 2.8%) 2.3% (2.3% - 2.4%) 1,315 1.0% (0.7% - 1.2%) 1.5% (1.5% - 1.5%) 1.5% (1.5% - 1.6%) 8 677 1.5% (1.1% - 1.9%) 3.3% (3.2% - 3.3%) 2.7% (2.7% - 2.8%) 591 1.1% (0.8% - 1.5%) 1.7% (1.7% - 1.7%) 1.8% (1.7% - 1.8%) 9 226 1.7% (1.2% - 2.6%) 3.8% (3.8% - 3.9%) 3.2% (3.1% - 3.2%) 177 1.1% (0.8% - 1.8%) 1.9% (1.8% - 2.0%) 2.0% (2.0% - 2.0%) 10 ( - ) 4.4% (4.3% - 4.5%) 3.6% (3.6% - 3.7%) ( - ) 2.1% (2.1% - 2.2%) 2.3% (2.2% - 2.3%) 11 ( - ) 4.9% (4.8% - 5.0%) 4.1% (4.0% - 4.2%) ( - ) 2.4% (2.4% - 2.5%) 2.6% (2.6% - 2.7%) 12 ( - ) 5.5% (5.4% - 5.6%) 4.6% (4.5% - 4.7%) ( - ) 2.7% (2.6% - 2.8%) 3.0% (2.9% - 3.0%) 13 ( - ) 6.0% (5.9% - 6.1%) 5.1% (5.0% - 5.2%) ( - ) 3.1% (3.0% - 3.2%) 3.4% (3.3% - 3.5%) 14 ( - ) 6.6% (6.4% - 6.8%) 5.6% (5.5% - 5.7%) ( - ) 3.5% (3.4% - 3.7%) 3.8% (3.7% - 3.9%) 15 ( - ) 7.3% (7.0% - 7.6%) 6.2% (6.0% - 6.5%) ( - ) ( - ) 4.5% (4.2% - 4.7%) Cumulative revision rate with 95% confidence intervals Rate is only reported for times where more than 40 remain at risk Page 11

Patient Reported Outcomes PROMs Analysis Comprising PROMs data up to and including: 31/12/2016 Oxford Hip Score (0-48) All NJR Cementless Cups All THR in NJR Paired Records 6,006 156,545 247,104 PreOp score 18.6 (18.4-18.8) 18.5 (18.5-18.5) 18.1 (18.1-18.1) 6 month score 40.4 (40.2-40.6) 39.8 (39.8-39.9) 39.2 (39.2-39.3) 6 month score (adjusted) 40.0 (39.8-40.2) 39.5 (39.5-39.5) 39.2 (39.2-39.3) Health gain 21.8 (21.6-22.1) 21.3 (21.3-21.4) 21.1 (21.1-21.2) Health gain (adjusted) 21.9 (21.7-22.1) 21.4 (21.4-21.4) 21.1 (21.1-21.2) p value (adjusted health gain) < 0.001 Score Improved 97.2% 97.2% 97.1% EQ-5D Index (-0.59-1.00) All NJR Cementless Cups All THR in NJR Paired Records 5,569 144,340 226,875 PreOp score 0.373 (0.365-0.382) 0.371 (0.369-0.372) 0.357 (0.356-0.359) 6 month score 0.810 (0.804-0.817) 0.801 (0.800-0.803) 0.789 (0.788-0.790) 6 month score (adjusted) 0.805 (0.799-0.811) 0.795 (0.794-0.796) 0.789 (0.788-0.790) Health gain 0.437 (0.428-0.446) 0.431 (0.429-0.433) 0.432 (0.431-0.433) Health gain (adjusted) 0.448 (0.442-0.454) 0.438 (0.437-0.439) 0.432 (0.431-0.433) p value (adjusted health gain) < 0.001 Score Improved 89.6% 89.5% 89.2% EQ-VAS (0-100) All NJR Cementless Cups All THR in NJR Paired Records 5,318 138,951 217,695 PreOp score 65.7 (65.1-66.3) 65.7 (65.6-65.8) 65.3 (65.2-65.4) 6 month score 78.7 (78.2-79.1) 77.5 (77.4-77.6) 76.6 (76.6-76.7) 6 month score (adjusted) 78.1 (77.7-78.5) 76.9 (76.8-77.0) 76.6 (76.6-76.7) Health gain 13.0 (12.4-13.6) 11.8 (11.7-11.9) 11.3 (11.2-11.4) Health gain (adjusted) 12.8 (12.4-13.2) 11.6 (11.5-11.7) 11.3 (11.3-11.4) p value (adjusted health gain) < 0.001 Score Improved 68.9% 66.1% 65.0% Adjusted scores correspond to the NHS Digital version 3 casemix-adjustment model. This includes patient variables from PROMs, HES, and IMD data. Page 12

PMS Report for: Responses are not case mix adjusted Patient Reported Outcomes Success Satisfaction 100% 100% 90% 90% 80% 80% 70% 70% 60% Much worse 60% Poor 50% A little worse 50% Fair 40% 30% 20% About the same A little better Much better 40% 30% 20% Good Very Good Excellent 10% 10% 0% All other Cementless Cups in NJR 0% All other Cementless Cups in NJR Chi-squared p-value for difference: 0.550 Chi-squared p-value for difference: <0.001 Answer to 6-months general health question: Overall, how are your problems now, compared to before your operation? Answer to 6-months general health question: How would you describe the results of your operation? Page 13

Disclaimer Disclaimer The National Joint Registry (NJR) produces this report through its contractor, Northgate Public Services (UK) Limited (NPS) using data collected, collated and provided by third parties. As a result, neither NJR or NPS takes any responsibility for the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of any data used or referred to in this report, and disclaims all warranties in relation to such data, in each case to the maximum extent permitted by legislation. To the maximum extent permitted by law, neither the NJR or NPS shall have any liability (including but not limited to liability by reason of negligence) for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of any person using or relying on the data within this report and whether caused by reason of any error, omission or misrepresentation in the report or otherwise. This report is not to be taken as advice. Third parties using or relying on the data in this report do so at their own risk and will be responsible for making their own assessment and should verify all relevant representations, statements and information with their own professional advisers. Page 14

Catalogue Number Description Number Implanted 71330004 R3 HEMI 3 HOLE ACET SHEL MM52 3 71330005 R3 HEMI 3 HOLE ACET SHEL MM54 2 71330006 R3 HEMI 3 HOLE ACET SHEL MM56 2 71330007 R3 HEMI 3 HOLE ACET SHEL MM58 2 71331854 R3 0 HOLE ACET SHELL 54MM 1 71331940 R3 3 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 40MM 5 71331942 R3 3 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 42MM 3 71331944 R3 3 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 44MM 9 71331946 R3 3 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 46MM 352 71331948 R3 3 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 48MM 1,951 71331950 R3 3 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 50MM 3,462 71331952 R3 3 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 52MM 4,657 71331954 R3 3 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 54MM 3,460 71331956 R3 3 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 56MM 2,618 71331958 R3 3 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 58MM 1,493 71331960 R3 3 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 60MM 711 71331962 R3 3 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 62MM 262 71331964 R3 3 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 64MM 104 71331966 R3 3 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 66MM 11 71331968 R3 3 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 68MM 1 71332246 R3 0 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 46MM 34 71332248 R3 0 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 48MM 285 71332250 R3 0 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 50MM 505 71332252 R3 0 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 52MM 703 71332254 R3 0 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 54MM 466 71332256 R3 0 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 56MM 421 71332258 R3 0 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 58MM 210 71332260 R3 0 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 60MM 98 71332262 R3 0 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 62MM 25 71332264 R3 0 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 64MM 3 71335548 R3 3 HOLE ACET SHELL MM48 2 71335550 R3 3 HOLE ACET SHELL 50MM 6 71335552 R3 3 HOLE ACET SHELL 52MM 1 71335554 R3 3 HOLE ACET SHELL 54MM 1 71335556 R3 3 HOLE ACET SHELL 56MM 1 71338663 R3 MULTI HOLE ACETABULAR SHELL 48MM 6 71338664 R3 MULTI HOLE ACETABULAR SHELL 50MM 9 71338665 R3 MULTI HOLE ACETABULAR SHELL 52MM 14 71338666 R3 MULTI HOLE ACETABULAR SHELL 54MM 18 71338667 R3 MULTI HOLE ACETABULAR SHELL 56MM 8 71338668 R3 MULTI HOLE ACETABULAR SHELL 58MM 8 71338669 R3 MULTI HOLE ACETABULAR SHELL 60MM 2 71338671 R3 MULTI HOLE ACETABULAR SHELL 62MM 3 71338733 R3 HA MULTI-HOLE ACET SHELL 48MM 7 71338734 R3 HA MULTI-HOLE ACET SHELL 50MM 17 71338735 R3 HA MULTI-HOLE ACET SHELL 52MM 20 Page 15

Catalogue Number Description Number Implanted 71338736 R3 HA MULTI-HOLE ACET SHELL 54MM 10 71338737 R3 HA MULTI-HOLE ACET SHELL 56MM 12 71338738 R3 HA MULTI-HOLE ACET SHELL 58MM 11 71338739 R3 HA MULTI-HOLE ACET SHELL 60MM 2 71338740 R3 HA MULTI-HOLE ACET SHELL 62MM 3 71338741 R3 HA MULTI-HOLE ACET SHELL 64MM 3 71338742 R3 HA MULTI-HOLE ACET SHELL 66MM 1 71338743 R3 HA MULTI-HOLE ACET SHELL 68MM 1 71338745 R3 HA MULTI-HOLE ACET SHELL 72MM 1 71339452 R3 MAX HEMI 3 HOLE MM52 4 Page 16