Development and validation of a device for measuring puffing topography of e-cigarette users

Similar documents
E-cigarette consumption and puffing topography data. Dr Sudhanshu Patwardhan FDA CTP Workshop, Hyattsville, Maryland. March 9, 2015.

Development and Validation of a Portable Puffing Topography Analyser

The Effect of Puff Profile and Volume on the Yields of E-Cigarettes

Nicotine delivery from e-cigarettes part I: study designs for two pharmacokinetic studies.

Aerosol Characterisation of e-cigarettes. Ross Cabot, Anna Koc, Caner U. Yurteri & John McAughey

CHARACTERIZATION OF PUFF TOPOGRAPHY DURING 8- HOURS OF AD LIBITUM USE OF MARKTEN E-VAPOR PRODUCTS

Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco. CORESTA Guide N 22

00:08 For decades our scientists have endeavoured to reduce the risks of tobacco use and continue to do so today. 00:15

2015 Report 05 October 2015 Jeju, South Korea

Nicotine delivery from e-cigarettes part II: data and learnings from two pharmacokinetic studies.

FEATURES AND PERFORMANCE OF THE HPP SMOKING MACHINE. Dritan Xhillari

A proposed bridging approach for the assessment of novel tobacco products

The Chemical characterisation of E-device Aerosols

Smoking Behaviour Sub-Group (TSB)

Nicotine Pharmacokinetics: Comparison of a cigarette, loose snus, pouched snus and nicotine gum

Use of electronic cigarettes (vapourisers) among adults in Great Britain

ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES WHAT S THE BOTTOM LINE?

Advanced in vitro exposure systems

PROCEDURE FOR GENERATION AND TESTING OF MAINSTREAM TOBACCO HEATING SYSTEM (THS or IQOS) AEROSOL USING A LINEAR SMOKING MACHINE

CORESTA RECOMMENDED METHOD N 25

Application of dosimetry tools for the assessment of e cigarette aerosol and cigarette smoke generated on two different in vitro exposure systems

Next Generation Products Sandra Costigan, Marianna Gaca, ChuanLiu, Kevin McAdam, James J. Murphyand Christopher Proctor British American Tobacco 21

The Effect of Puff Duration on Smoke Chemistry

Contribution To Standards Development For Next Generation Products. Eduardo BEREA Alternative Ingredients ENDS 2018 London 4-5 June 2018

The concept that not all tobacco and nicotine products

Use of e-cigarettes (vapourisers) among adults in Great Britain

The importance of offering adult smokers a portfolio of potentially less harmful products

METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION: QUANTIFICATION OF METALS IN LIQUIDS AND AEROSOL OF E-CIGARETTES

Physical and chemical properties of cigarette, heated tobacco and e-cigarette aerosols

Electronic cigarettes: Pre-clinical and clinical assessment

The adverse health effects associated with traditional

CORESTA Guide N o 18

E-Cigarette Vaping: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

E-Vapour (EVAP) Sub-Group 2017 Report. Kitzbühel, Austria October 10, 2017

UK E-Cigarette Summit Relative risks of cancer posed by combustible and vapourising forms of nicotine delivery: Evidence from chemical exposures

Nicotine Reduction Workshop Role of nicotine in smoking behaviour

Smoke Free Policy Practice Guidance Note Guidance on the use of E-Cigarettes by Service Users, Staff and Visitors - V02

ESPs are battery-operated devices that contain cartridges filled with liquid chemicals. The chemicals turn into a vapour that the user inhales (this

Pierre-Marie GUITTON Next Generation Nicotine Delivery London June, 2017

Contribution To Standards Development For Next Generation Products. Dr Nils ROSE

TNCO Testing procedures

Advanced in vitro exposure systems VITROCELL VC 1 SMOKING MACHINE

CORESTA RECOMMENDED METHOD NÄ 9

Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS): an update on a rapidly evolving vapour market

DEVELOPMENT OF A TECHNIQUE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ph-values OF AEROSOLS GENERATED BY E-CIGARETTES

Use of electronic cigarettes among children in Great Britain

JUUL and Other Emerging Tobacco Products. Emily McClelland, M.S. December 6, 2018

Peter G. Shields, MD Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee (TPSAC) August 16, 2013

ONLINE AEROSOL ANALYSIS USING FTIR: ASSESSING CARBONYL YIELDS IN E-CIGARETTE AEROSOL

Cigarette Smoke Generator

Evaluation of the Potential for Second-hand Exposure to E-cigarette Aerosol in an Office Environment

Centre for Addictive Behaviours Research. Attitudes to tobacco and e- cigarettes, e-cig ads and ASMs

CORESTA Recommended Method No. 84

CORESTA RECOMMENDED METHOD N 8

Smoking, e-cigs and reduced risk products. Dr John Schoonbee, IMS November 2017

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON FILTER EFFICIENCY OF DIFFERENT BRANDS OF CIGARETTES BY MICROSCOPIC AND SPECTROSCOPIC TECHNIQUES

Advanced in vitro exposure systems VITROCELL VC 10 S-TYPE SMOKING ROBOT

E-Cigarette Product Regulation and Standardisation

THE INFLUENCE OF CIGARETTE FILTER DESIGN ON THE YIELD AND COMPOSITION OF CIGARETTE SMOKE

Effect of Sugars on Selected Toxicant Yields in e-cigarettes

Peripheral Vessels Unit, 1st Department of Cardiology Athens Medical School Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Kevin Walton, Ph.D. Chief, Clinical Research Grants Branch Division of Therapeutics and Medical Consequences NIDA. No disclosures

Nicotine pharmacokinetics of electronic cigarettes: experimental data and a review of the literature

E-Cigarette Use Transitions: a Case Study from Waves 1 & 2 of the PATH Study

Global E-Cigarette Market- Industry Analysis & Outlook ( )

PRODUCT CATALOG. VAPOR4LIFE INC. Advanced Vaping Technology

Routine Analytical Chemistry Sub-Group Report Berlin 2016

E-Cigarettes and Vapes

Ian M. Fearon, Madeleine Ashley, Christopher J. Shepperd, Graham Errington. Sheri A. Bowman, John W. Caraway, Peter Chen, Paul R.

CORESTA Recommended Method No. 74

Applicant Name: GD Sigelei Electroinc Tech Co., Ltd B7 Building, No.1 District, Xicheng Science and Technology Park, Hengli Town, Dongguan, China

Stop the Vape. Maria Hines RN, MSN. Denise Kneubuhler RN, MSN

FORMs of TOBACCO. 2 nd of 3 Prep for Session 1

Global E-Cigarette & Vaporizer Market Research Report - Forecast 2011 to 2021

A study to examine changes in exposure to cigarette smoke chemicals when a smoker switches to using a tobacco heating product. Part I: Study Design.

Emissions from electronic cigarettes: Assessing vapers intake of toxic compounds, secondhand exposures and the associated health impacts

Modelling the effects of user exposure to harmful emissions across the spectrum of nicotine delivery

Heat-not-Burn Products: Scientific Assessment of Risk Reduction

CORESTA RECOMMENDED METHOD N 22

Cigarettes Determination of tobacco specific nitrosamines in mainstream cigarette smoke Method using LC-MS/MS

ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE EVOLUTION FROM FIRST TO FOURTH GENERATION PRODUCTS AND BEYOND

REGULATORY OPTIONS FOR MOVING TO THE ELIMINATION OF SMOKING. Ron Borland PhD

CORESTA Recommended Method No. 78

Correspondence should be addressed to Arit M. Harvanko;

Electronic Cigarettes, Nicotine and Policy Implications

Particle Size Distribution of E-Cigarette Aerosols and the Relationship to Cambridge Filter Pad Collection Efficiency

HARM REDUCTION The opportunity

RNA-SEQ based toxicogenomics comparison of airway cells exposed to Vype TM epen vapour and cigarette smoke.

Assessment of the Tobacco Heating System (THS) 2.2, A Candidate Modified Risk Tobacco Product: From Concept to Early Clinical Data

Regulatory Support for Tobacco Products. Feeling daunted by the regulatory process for tobacco products? Don t worry Battelle can help.

Responsible Practice in E-Vapour Products (EVP) Product Stewardship

Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: Patterns of Use and Disparities

Routine Analytical Chemistry Sub-Group. Technical Report

Investigation on the Controlling Matters Variation in Cigarette Smoke

RE: Docket No. FDA-2014-N , Electronic Cigarettes and the Public Health

Clear the Vapor: FILTERING FACTS FROM MYTHS ON VAPING, JUULING & CANNABIS

Key Variables in Assessing ENDS Devices AND WHY THAT ISN T VOLTS

BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO Science & Technology report

Transcription:

Development and validation of a device for measuring puffing topography of e-cigarette users CUNNINGHAM A. 1 ; SLAYFORD S. 1 ; VAS C. 1 ; GEE J. 1 ; COSTIGAN S. 2 ; PRASAD K. 1 1 British American Tobacco, Group Research & Development, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL, U.K. Krishna_Prasad@bat.com 2 Nicoventures, 22 Tudor Street, London, EC4Y OAY, U.K ST 56, CORESTA Congress, Québec City, Canada 12 th 16 th October 2014 1

Background E-cigarettes are gaining popularity, with limited data available on users puffing behaviour Acknowledged that large variation exists in smokers puffing behaviour - International Standard method (ISO 3308.2000) - Indirect method: filter analysis - Direct method: puffing topography - Video We aimed to validate a topography device for recording puffing behaviour of e-cigarette users 2

The Current SA7 System Initial approach to use existing Smoking Analyser Number 7 technology 1 Inaccurate puff volumes observed following repeated puffing on commercially available products Condensation of excipients in topography holder and partial blocking of tubes to pressure transducer Re-design of the SA7 topography measurement device undertaken 1 A Device to Measure a Smoker s Puffing Topography and Real-Time Puff-by- Puff Tar Delivery, Slayford S.J., Frost B.E., Beitrage zur Tabakforschung, 2014. 26 (2), 74 84. 3

Modified SA7 Pressure & Flow Calibration Calibration - Pressure calibration: 0 120 mmwg - Flow calibration: 2 120 ml/sec - Calibrated pressure gauge & Borgwaldt A14 syringe driver E-cigarette holder demonstrated extremely good linearity for puff volume measurements Measured Puff Volume (ml) 100 80 60 40 20 n = 3 y = 1.006x - 0.700 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Set Puff Volume as measured by burette (ml) 4

Puffing Regimes & Profiles Without e-cigarette Performance of e-cigarette holder used to measure a range of puffing regimes and puff flow profiles Puff Flow Profile Shape Puffing Regime Set Puff Volume (ml) Set Puff Duration (s) Sine Rectangle Triangle Early Triangle 1 20 1.5 2 40 2.0 3 60 2.5 4 80 3.0 5 20 1.5 6 40 2.0 7 60 2.5 8 80 3.0 9 20 1.5 10 40 2.0 11 60 2.5 12 80 3.0 13 20 1.5 14 40 2.0 15 60 2.5 16 80 3.0 5

Puffing Regimes & Profiles Without e-cigarette Flow Rate (ml/sec) 60 40 20 0 Sine Wave 0 1 2 3 4 Puff Duration (s) Flow Rate (ml/sec) 30 20 10 0 Square Wave 0 1 2 3 4 Puff Duration (s) Flow Rate (ml/sec) 60 40 20 0 Triangle 0 1 2 3 4 Puff Duration (s) Flow Rate (ml/sec) 80 60 40 20 0 Early Triangle 0 1 2 3 4 Puff Duration (s) 6

Puffing Regimes & Profiles Results Testing completed for sine, triangle, square and early triangle profiles Three replicates of each puffing regime were measured and recorded using the e-cigarette holder without the use of an e-cigarette in-line Accurate determination of puff volume and puff duration using e-cigarette holder Puff volumes: ±1.0 ml across a 20 80 ml range Puff durations: ±0.1 s across a 1.5 3.0 s range 7

Testing of e-cigarette devices Tested a range of e-cigarette devices - Disposable - Rechargeable cartomiser-based - Rechargeable modular / tank system Puffing Regime (#) Puff Volume (ml) Puff Duration (s) Puff Frequency (s) Flow Rate (ml/s) Puff Flow Profile (#) 1 55 3.0 30 18.3 Square 2 80 3.0 30 26.7 Square 3 120 3.0 30 40.0 Square E-cigarette devices puffed to exhaustion of battery, or to 150 puffs 3 replicates per product per regime tested 8

Testing of devices using e-cigarette holder Device 55 80 120 Disposable Rechargeable cartomiser-based n = 267 55.1 (0.2) n = 434 54.8 (0.2) Set Puff Volume (ml) a ) n = 266 80.5 (0.3) n = 399 80.0 (0.3) n = 234 120.0 (1.1) n = 423 119.1 (0.6) Rechargeable modular / tank system n = 450 55.0 (0.8) a Presented as Mean values (Standard Deviation) n = 451 80.4 (1.2) n = 452 120.0 (1.2) The largest deviation across all tests gave puff volumes within 8.2% (4.5 ml) of pre-set values Comparable accuracy to combustible cigarette measurements of 6% 1 1 A Device to Measure a Smoker s Puffing Topography and Real-Time Puff-by-Puff Tar Delivery, Slayford S.J., Frost B.E., Beitrage zur Tabakforschung, 2014. 26 (2), 74 84. 9

Conclusion of laboratory validation E-cigarette holder accurately measures: - Puff Volumes - Puff Durations (Allows for the determination of puff frequency) For a range of e-cigarette devices, tested using three puffing regimes Next Steps e-cigarette holder used to measure users puffing behaviour in field trial 10

Field Study Validation Recruitment Demographics 32 users of re-chargeable e-cigarette products recruited 28 users of modular e-cigarette products recruited Age ranging between 21 64 years Male / Female equal gender split Use of e-cigarettes a minimum of two or more days per week ideally daily e-cigarette usage Volunteers could be dual users of e-cigarettes and tobacco products 11

Field Study Validation Experimental Products: Volunteers provided with either a Vype Reload or Vype epen device Number of Replicates: Volunteers vaped through the e- cigarette holder on two separate occasions on different days Topography Measurement: A new cartomiser was used for each replicate, with a fully charged battery 12

Field Study Validation Results (Vype Reload) Puffing Behaviour a Length of Session (Min:Sec) Number of Puffs (#) Total Puff Volume (ml) Mean Puff Volume (ml) Mean Puff Duration (s) Mean Puff Frequency (s) Rep. 1 (n=32) 7:10 (4:12) 22.0 (16.3) 1017 (642) 50.4 (21.0) 2.0 (0.6) 22.8 (10.8) Rep. 2 (n=32) 6:38 (3:13) 20.3 (13.6) 979 (555) 54.0 (22.4) 2.1 (0.7) 22.6 (10.7) Total dataset (n=64) 6:54 (3:43) 21.1 (14.9) 998 (596) 52.2 (21.6) 2.0 (0.7) 23.2 (10.6) a Presented as Mean values (Standard Deviation) Paired Comparison b (n=32) Length of Session Number of Puffs Total Puff Volume Puff Volume Puff Duration Puff Frequency p value 0.372 0.588 0.734 0.079 0.393 0.717 b Paired t-test, α 0.05 No statistical difference in replicate data 13

Field Study Validation Results (Vype epen) Puffing Behaviour a High Setting (n=28) Low Setting (n=27) Total dataset (n=55) Length of Session (Min:Sec) Number of Puffs (#) Total Puff Volume (ml) Mean Puff Volume (ml) Mean Puff Duration (s) Mean Puff Frequency (s) 7:04 (5:33) 14.3 (6.0) 1212 (722) 83.9 (42.4) 2.3 (1.0) 30.2 (19.7) 8:19 (7.00) 18.1 (9.3) 1420 (876) 82.1 (46.9) 2.1 (0.9) 28.5 (19.0) 7:41 (6:17) 16.1 (8.0) 1314 (801) 83.0 (44.2) 2.20 (0.93) 29.4 (19.2) a Presented as Mean values (Standard Deviation) Paired Comparison b (n=27) Length of Session Number of Puffs Total Puff Volume Puff Volume Puff Duration Puff Frequency p value 0.409 0.068 0.115 0.926 0.252 0.564 b Paired t-test, α 0.05 No statistical difference between the two settings 14

Summary The e-cigarette holder accurately records the puffing topography of e-cigarette users, number of puffs taken, puff durations and puff intervals This record, if required, can be duplicated in the laboratory, reproducing the individual s puffing behaviour to determine their exposure to aerosol constituents of interest Puffing topography data can be used to develop testing regimes for e-cigarettes in a manner reflective of users behaviour Further work may be required to validate the device using a wide range of commercial e-cigarette devices 15

Acknowledgements Mr N. Oakes of Turquoise Engineering for manufacturing the e-cigarette holders Thank you for listening! This presentation is available on bat-science.com 16

www.bat-science.com we welcome your comments