Noise Monitoring. T. Renée Anthony, PhD, CIH, CSP University of Iowa, College of Public Health

Similar documents
INDH 5131 Controls of Occupational Hazards. Noise & Hearing Conservation. Part II. V. Audiometric Testing

3M Center for Hearing Conservation

Environmental Health & Safety Policy Manual

This program is designed to prevent hearing loss for students, staff and employees while engaged in universitysponsored

NOISE SURVEY. EQUIPMENT: Sound Level Meter Octave Band Analyzer Dosimeters Sound Calibrator Survey Sheets Tape measure SP 10

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program April 27, 2018

Hearing Conservation Program Regulations and Recommendations Summary

Earplug Attenuation Validation As Part of a Hearing Conservation Program. David Friedman, CIH,MSPH, ARM Luminant

HEARING CONSERVATION PROCEDURE

Hearing Conservation Program

Six Components of Hearing Conservation Program. Helene R. Freed, Ed.M Public Relations Specialist Industrial Hearing Testing

Model Safety Program

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Before taking field measurements, it is important to determine the type of information required. The person making the measurement must understand:

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

3M Occupational Health and Environmental Safety Division 3M NoisePro Personal Noise Dosimeter. NoisePro Series. Quick Start Guide

Hearing Conservation Program

Santa Clarita Community College District HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM. Revised

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program

Procedure Number 310 TVA Safety Procedure Page 1 of 6 Hearing Conservation Revision 0 January 6, 2003

Hearing Conservation Terminology Courtesy of Workplace Integra, Inc.

Hearing Conservation

North Dakota State University Noise/Hearing Conservation

Workplace Noise Surveys: A Hands-On Measurement Workshop

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Craven Community College HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

CITY OF FORT BRAGG HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

East Carolina University

Your Company Hearing Conservation Program

Estimating Worker Noise Exposure In Medium noise environments in the Semiconductor Industry Oteri Oghoghomeh Portfolio Project Presentation

Hearing Conservation in the Power Generation Industry A Perspective on Integrating Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Health

SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY S WRITTEN HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM December 2017

noise induced Working Together to Prevent Hearing Loss

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Hearing Conservation

BEAUFORT COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE OCCUPATIONAL NOISE

TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY ENERGY SUPPLY HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Hearing Conservation Program. Southwestern Community College. Office of Human Resources

Current Issues in Hearing Loss Prevention

Delaware State University

Villanova University Department of Environmental Health and Safety Policy and Procedure Manual

Procedure. Procedure

UCSD HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Environment, Health & Safety (EH&S) and Center for Occupational & Environmental Medicine (COEM) 2017

Environment CAUTION HEARING PROTECTION REQUIRED. Occupational Noise Exposure Requirements for Photographic Processing Facilities

POLICY TRAINING HEARING PROTECTION. Noise Exposure

Workplace Noise Surveys: A Hands-On Measurement Workshop

NOISE & HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM YALE UNIVERSITY

Noise at Work Regulations. Mick Gray MRSC, LFOH, ROH. MWG Associates Ltd

11. Hearing Conservation Program Chapter , WAC

Health Standards to Protect Miners from Hearing Loss

Six Components of Hearing Conservation Program. Helene R. Freed, Ed.M Public Relations Specialist Industrial Hearing Testing

Health, Safety, Security and Environment

Effective Date: 27-February Table of Contents

Methods of validation of occupational noise exposure measurement with multi aspect personal sound exposure meter

Hearing Conservation Program

What s New? Example 2 Employee B. Example 1 - Employee A

Gettysburg College. Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program

ipod Noise Exposure Assessment in Simulated Environmental Conditions

Hearing Conservation Plan

ACOUSTIC INFRASOUND AND LOW-FREQUENCY SOUND

Hearing Conservation Program Administration

Vision Painting Inc. Safety Management System

NC Employees Workplace Program Requirements for Safety and Health. Hearing Conservation

CONSTRUCTION NOISE & HEARING LOSS PREVENTION

Hearing Conservation and Noise Control

Hearing Conservation Program Table of Contents

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Texas Christian University

SNAP-ON INCORPORATED STANDARD ON HEARING CONSERVATION

Hearing Conservation Plan

Simultaneous Measurement of At Ear and Shoulder Noise Exposures

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

HEARING LOSS PREVENTION PROGRAM AND PROCEDURES

OCCUPATIONAL NOISE PROGRAM

Gettysburg College. Hearing Conservation Program

Contents. 1) Purpose ) Policy ) Definitions ) Procedure a) Requirements b) Noise standard... 4

UC Santa Barbara Hearing Conservation Program Manual

HEARING CONSERVATION PURPOSE

29 CFR OCCUPATIONAL NOISE EXPOSURE

UC Merced Hearing Conservation Program

Emerging Best Practices. Christine B. Petitti Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management OSHA

HEARING CONSERVATION & NOISE EXPOSURE. 10/1/99 Created By: C. Miterko 1

Solutions for Risk Reduction

CCS Administrative Procedure H Hearing Conservation

Page104. Hearing Conservation Program

The University of Texas at El Paso

Operations: HSE. Health and Industrial Hygiene. Noise & Hearing Conservation Safe Work Practice

Hearing Conservation Program

Occupational Noise Exposure

Hearing Loss Prevention PM Session Ted Madison

Noise Exposure Assessments 101 (Parts 1-3)

Environmental Health and Safety. Hearing Conservation Program

Environmental Health & Safety Programs

Baylor University Hearing Conservation Program OSHA 29 CFR

Re-Thinking Adverse Noise Effects and Interactions with Other Exposures

Transcription:

Noise Monitoring T. Renée Anthony, PhD, CIH, CSP University of Iowa, College of Public Health Renee-Anthony@uiowa.edu Iowa-Illinois Safety Council April 14, 16 2:35-3:35 pm 2 Objectives At the end of the session, participants will understand: Noise exposure terminology and guidelines Essential equipment configurations How to interpret dosimeter output to make decisions Current trends of regulators and best practices 1

3 Sound/Noise Refresher Sound: small, quick variation in surrounding pressure, caused by compression and rarefaction of molecules Noise: Unwanted sound LOUDNESS = Pressure amplitude 4 Sound/Noise Refresher LOUDNESS = Pressure amplitude Measure this sound pressure level (SPL) in units of dba Pressure ratio based on threshold of hearing SPL in db = log [p 1 /p 0 ] 2 = log [p 1 /p 0 ] Reference level pressure = p 0 p 0 = 0.0002 dyne/cm 2 = 0.00002 N/m 2 = μpa 2

5 Sound/Noise Refresher Because dba is in a log scale, we need to consider effects differently than arithmetic averages Pressures might add directly Noise in dba do not Lp log Lp log i1 Using this equation, we can see that two noise sources of same pressure results in 3 db increase in overall sound level log Double INTENSITY increase SPL by 3 db n Lp i 9 9 9 log 2 9.3 93 6 Guidelines: Exposure Limits OSHA (19.95; 1926.52) Engineering: dba, 8 hr Hearing Conservation: 85 dba, 8 hr NIOSH 85 dba, 8 hr ACGIH 85 dba, 8 hr We need to set up equipment specific to each limit. 3

7 Guidelines: Exposure Limits OSHA (19.95; 1926.52) Engineering: dba, 8 hr Hearing Conservation: 85 dba, 8 hr NIOSH 85 dba, 8 hr ACGIH 85 dba, 8 hr Exchange/ Doubling Rate: 5 db 5 db 3 db 3 db For every doubling rate db increase, half the time allowed 8 Guidelines: Exposure Limits OSHA (19.95; 1926.52) Engineering: dba, 8 hr Hearing Conservation: 85 dba, 8 hr NIOSH 85 dba, 8 hr ACGIH 85 dba, 8 hr Threshold: dba 80 dba 80 dba 80 dba Do not include sound levels that are BELOW these values in the computed time-weighted average exposure 4

9 Guidelines: Exposure Limits OSHA (19.95; 1926.52) Engineering: dba, 8 hr Hearing Conservation: 85 dba, 8 hr Exposure limits based on TIME ALLOWED at a specific dba T (hrs) = 8 / 2 (L-)/5 L = measured A-weighted sound level Sound Level (dba) Time Period (Hrs) 8 92 6.1 95 4 97 3 0 2 2 1.5 5 1 1 0.5 115 0.25 Guidelines: Exposure Limits NIOSH & ACGIH 85 dba, 8 hr T (hrs) = 8 / 2 (L-85)/3 L = measured A-weighted sound level Sound Level (dba) Time Period (Hrs) 85 8 88 4 91 2 94 1 97 0.5 0 0.25 3 7min sec 6 3min 45sec 9 1min 53sec 5

11 Guidelines: Exposure Limits OSHA Engineering: dba TWA Criterion ( dba threshold, 5 db doubling, slow, A-weight) OSHA HC setting: 85 dba TWA (80 dba threshold, 5 db doubling, slow, A-weight) NIOSH/ACGIH setting: 85 dba TWA Criterion (80 dba threshold, 3 db doubling, slow, A-weight) Why different? 3 db doubling accounts for Doubling of sound energy Health outcomes 85 vs dba TWA: Neither protects all workers. NIOSH estimates 40-year lifetime risk (8 hr/day, 40 hr/week) of NIHL for workers: dba: 1 in 4 workers (25%) 85 dba: 1 in 12 workers (8%) 12 Monitor Configurations You must decide the standard(s) you want to use before you set up your monitors ALL: Slow response, A-weighted Doubling Rate: OSHA (5) or Not-OSHA (3) Threshold: All hearing conservation sets this to 80 dba If you are assessing noise levels in quieter places (offices, restaurants, etc.), you can drop this even further just note it on your records Modern dosimeters typically store and compute exposures for 2 settings 6

13 Monitor Configurations Recommendation for two-setting units: OSHA HC setting; 80 dba threshold, 5 db doubling, slow, A-weight NIOSH/ACGIH setting 80 dba threshold, 3 db doubling, slow, A-weight This leaves out the dba engineering control limit Using OSHA HC readings to make dba feasible engineering control decisions is conservative You may overestimate the Engineering TWA, but note to file how you sampled. You can also download data and manually zero data below the dba threshold and recalculate TWA 14 Threshold = 70 db lower than required: concerned get no information OSHA-HC threshold of 80: lots of 1-minute data 0 db How Do Settings Affect Data? Lavg, db Worker 1: High variability, low noise Plot 1-minute L avg 334 min sample 0 80 70 60 50 40 OSHA-HC 0 8: AM :11 AM 11:52 AM 1:32 PM 3:13 PM 4:54 PM Sample Time 7

15 Threshold = 70 db lower than required: concerned get no information OSHA-HC threshold of 80: lots of 1-minute data 0 db How Do Settings Affect Data? All these were 1-min periods when no noise exceeded the threshold 0 dba Lavg, db Worker 1: High variability, low noise, Plot 1-minute L avg 334 min sample 0 80 70 60 50 40 OSHA-HC 0 8: AM :11 AM 11:52 AM 1:32 PM 3:13 PM 4:54 PM Sample Time 16 Threshold = 70 db lower than required: concerned get no information OSHA-HC threshold of 80: No 1-minute data 0 db How Do Settings Affect Data? Lavg, db Worker 2: Low variability, high noise Plot 1-minute L avg 158 min sample 0 80 70 60 50 40 OSHA-HC 0 8: AM :11 AM 11:52 AM 1:32 PM 3:13 PM 4:54 PM Sample Time 8

17 Sound Level Meter vs Dosimeter Sound Level Meter Record area readings Identify high / low noise areas Do time-motion studies to compute TWAs Must identify Time Spent in sound level areas over a shift Walk through: take readings at ear height, where workers stand Compute Dose TWA 18 Sound Level Meter vs Dosimeter Sound Level Meter Record area readings Identify high / low noise areas Do time-motion studies to compute TWAs Must identify Time Spent in sound level areas over a shift Walk through: take readings at ear height, where workers stand Compute Dose TWA Dosimeter Obtain personal exposures measures sound and time spent at sound level Microphone on shoulder (near ear) Check throughout shift; beneficial to take sound level readings in work area Electronic calculations 9

19 How to Select Meters Need at least Type 2 device +/- 2 db accuracy Slow response, A-weighting Wind screen Need to calibrate Before and after testing (2/day) Fittings must mate to microphone Units typically 114 db at 00 Hz Annual checks of calibrator by MFR are needed Type: 0: Lab 1: High precision field (OBA) 2: General purpose ANSI S1.4 (Specifications for sound level meters) Note: a 02 version Dosimeter Output

21 Dosimeter Output Review the manufacturer s book AND sequence of output on screen to make a form to identify which output you want to record, by hand, at end of the day. If renting equipment, make sure you get download software and export data (to excel) 22 Data Processing If Sound Level: Manual processing Download / grab off screen if dosimeter Objective: Obtain exposure information: TWA (or projected TWA if sample for << 8 hours) Dose (and projected dose ) Run time (to confirm projections) Don t forget to document your setup!! (Doubling rate, Threshold, Criterion) Compare the Exposures to your Limits Determine who is included in HC Program Include TWA (projected TWA) in audiometric files Assess effectiveness of HPD (NRR) 11

23 How to Calculate TWA? Determine Time Exposed at a given SPL Measure SPL Compute TIME ALLOWED at that SPL At SPL i : D i = Time Exposed Time Allowed Compute Dose (over all day, all SPL) Exposed D Allowed 1 1 Exposed Allowed 2 2 Exposed... Allowed n n TWA OSHA = [16.61 log D] + TWA NIOSH, ACGIH = log D+85 Compute TWA Compute Projected DOSE Proj.D Dose measured (Hr Shift /Hr Sampled ) D=dose, as fraction Record TWA on audiogram Is TWA < or > Exposure limit? 24 Additional Considerations: #1 What if sample << full shift? Proj.D Dose measured (Hr /Hr MUST use projected data (unless zero exposure rest of shift) This DOES confuse people: Noise doesn t merely average in the morning and afternoon, think of it accumulating If we only sample <8 hours, our TIME ALLOWED presumes 8 hours Shift Sampled ) 12

25 Additional Considerations: #1 What if sample << full shift? MUST use projected data (unless zero exposure rest of shift) This DOES confuse people: Noise doesn t merely average in the morning and afternoon, think of it accumulating If we only sample <8 hours, our TIME ALLOWED presumes 8 hours Think about it this way: Proj.D Dose measured (Hr /Hr If I sampled someone for only 4 hours( let s use NIOSH criteria): If at 88 dba over 4 hours Time allowed is 4 hours: Dose = (Time at/time allowed) = (4 hours at/ 4 hours allowed) = 1.0 (or 0%) But if the rest of the day, they continued to receive this noise exposure, they would have been at 88 dba for 8 hours: Dose = (8 hr exposed/4 hours allowed) = 2.0 This is a 0% dose this requires control. Proj. Dose = = 1.0 x (8-hr/4-hr sample) = 2.0 Shift Sampled ) 26 Additional Considerations: #2 What if work longer than 8-hours? OSHA: Adjust the HC limit to account for longer shift (Hr) and less recovery time Hr 16.61.Hr + If work 9.5 hours, the 85 dba hearing conservation limit for 8-hours becomes: 16.61 x log(50/(12.5*9.5)) + = 16.61 x log(0.42) + = 16.61*(-0.376) + =(-6.24) + = 83.7 dba Interpretation: Persons with exposures above 83.7 dba result in inclusion in hearing conservation program when working a 9.5 hour shift 13

27 Interpreting Output NIOSH & ACGIH TWA > 85 (Dose > 1.0) Reduce exposures to all workers at and above 85 (with 3dB doubling!) Implement HCP, protect everyone NIOSH indicates that 1 in 12 may still experience STS if we protect only to 85 OSHA If TWA >85 dba (Dose > 0.5): Hearing Conservation (annual audiometric testing, training, etc.) If anyone in this group has STS, must reduce exposures to < 85 dba If TWA > dba (Dose>1.0): Protect hearing to all workers (reduce exposure to ears to dba) Implement feasible engineering or administrative controls 28 Threshold = 70 db lower than required: concerned get no information OSHA-HC threshold of 80: lots of 1-minute data 0 db Worker 1 Example: Lavg, db High variability, low noise, 334 min sample Plot 1-minute L avg 0 80 70 60 50 40 OSHA-HC 0 8: AM :11 AM 11:52 AM 1:32 PM 3:13 PM 4:54 PM Sample Time 14

29 OSHA HC Worker 1 Example: Dose 0.03 0. TWA 65.7 75.0 TWA > TWA OSHA-HC Are we concerned? Are we done? Lavg, db High variability, low noise, 334 min sample Plot 1-minute L avg 0 80 70 60 50 40 OSHA-HC 0 8: AM :11 AM 11:52 AM 1:32 PM 3:13 PM 4:54 PM Sample Time OSHA HC Worker 1 Example: NIOSHadj NIOSHadj Dose 0.03 0. TWA 65.7 75.0 pdose 0.05 0.14 ptwa 68.3 76.6 TWA > TWA OSHA-HC Are we concerned? Lavg, db High variability, low noise, 334 min sample Plot 1-minute L avg 0 80 70 60 50 40 OSHA-HC 0 8: AM :11 AM 11:52 AM 1:32 PM 3:13 PM 4:54 PM Sample Time 15

31 Threshold = 70 db lower than required: concerned get no information OSHA-HC threshold of 80: No 1-minute data 0 db Worker 2 Example: Lavg, db Low variability, high noise, 158 min sample Plot 1-minute L avg 0 80 70 60 50 40 OSHA-HC 0 8: AM :11 AM 11:52 AM 1:32 PM 3:13 PM 4:54 PM Sample Time 32 OSHA HC Worker 2 Example: NIOSHadj Dose 0.25 0. TWA 80.1 84.5 TWA > TWA OSHA-HC Are we concerned? Are we done? Lavg, db Low variability, high noise, 158 min sample Plot 1-minute L avg 0 80 70 60 50 40 OSHA-HC 0 8: AM :11 AM 11:52 AM 1:32 PM 3:13 PM 4:54 PM Sample Time 16

33 OSHA HC Worker 2 Example NIOSHadj Dose 0.25 0. TWA 80.1 84.5 pdose 0.77 2.72 ptwa 88.1 89.4 TWA > TWA OSHA-HC Are We Concerned? Are We Done? Interpret: OSHA: worker in HCP (protection if STS) NIOSH: worker needs protection Lavg, db Low variability, high noise, 158 min sample Plot 1-minute L avg 0 80 70 60 50 40 OSHA-HC 0 8: AM :11 AM 11:52 AM 1:32 PM 3:13 PM 4:54 PM Sample Time 34 Questions on Measurements? 17

35 Current Trends in Regulations OSHA: : Proposed interpretation of Feasible administrative/engineering controls Docket number: OSHA--0032 request for comments interpreting feasible 11: News Release = review stage Currently: no activity OHSRC Decisions: Cost-Benefit interpretation of what is feasible (19 OSHA Enforcement: Employers can rely on PPE if that method reduces noise exposures to acceptable levels and is less costly than administrative and engineering controls. See: https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table= FEDERAL_REGISTER&p_id=21773 36 Current Trends in Regulations EPA NRR Activities Proposal 8/5/09 40 CFR 211 Subpart B Still on docket, but no action ( Final Action: 06/11 ) Proposal: https://federalregister.gov/a/e9-18003 Rule Action: http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eagendaviewrule?pubid=14&rin=60-ao25 18

37 Other Current Trends ANSI: A.46: Hearing Loss Prevention in Construction and Demolition workers NIOSH: Prevention through design Buy Quiet program Power Tool database Engineering Controls: Note that we have covered exposure assessment equipment today If looking to control noise, need to look at frequency information (Octave Band Analyzers) 38 Questions? At the end of the session, participants will understand: Noise exposure terminology and guidelines Essential equipment configurations How to interpret dosimeter output to make decisions Current trends of regulators and best practices 19