Key Clinical & Scientific Abstracts from ASH Dr. Rakesh Popat St. Bartholomew s Hospital London

Similar documents
To Maintain or Not to Maintain? Immunomodulators vs PIs Yes: Proteasome Inhibitors

Initial Therapy For Transplant-Eligible Patients With Multiple Myeloma. Michele Cavo, MD University of Bologna Bologna, Italy

Progress in Multiple Myeloma

Role of consolidation therapy in Multiple Myeloma. Pieter Sonneveld. Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam The Netherlands

Standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are not eligible for a transplant

Christine Chen Princess Margaret Cancer Centre September 2013

Novel Combination Therapies for Untreated Multiple Myeloma

VI. Autologous stem cell transplantation and maintenance therapy

Terapia del mieloma. La terapia di prima linea nel paziente giovane. Elena Zamagni

Risk of Second Primary Malignancies (SPMs) Following. Bortezomib (Btz)-Based Therapy: Analysis of Four Phase 3

CREDIT DESIGNATION STATEMENT

Disclosures for Palumbo Antonio, MD

Is autologous stem cell transplant the best consolidation after initial therapy?

Role of Maintenance and Consolidation Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: A Patient-centered Approach

Michel Delforge Belgium. New treatment options for multiple myeloma

Consolidation and maintenance therapy for transplant eligible myeloma patients

Consolidation and Maintenance therapy

Treatment of elderly multiple myeloma patients

COMy Congress The case for IMids. Xavier Leleu. Hôpital la Milétrie, PRC, CHU, Poitiers, France

CME Information LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Timing of Transplant for Multiple Myeloma

Multiple Myeloma: ASH 2008

Approach to the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. S. Vincent Rajkumar Professor of Medicine Mayo Clinic

Induction Therapy in Transplant Eligible MM 2 December Tontanai Numbenjapon, M.D.

Risk stratification in the older patient; what are our priorities?

Treatment Strategies for Transplant-ineligible NDMM Patients

How I Treat Transplant Eligible Myeloma Patients

Il trattamento del Mieloma su stratificazione di rischio: è oggi possibile?

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma Optimal Frontline Therapy and Maintenance Therapy

Transplant in MM patients: Early versus late. Mario Boccadoro. Barcelona

Multiple myeloma, 25 (45) years of progress. The IFM experience in patients treated with frontline ASCT. Philippe Moreau, Nantes

Clinical Case Study Discussion: Maintenance in MM

Multiple Myeloma in the Elderly: When to Treat, When to Go to Transplant

Multiple Myeloma Brian Berryman, M.D. March 8 th, 2014

Treatment of elderly patients with multiple myeloma

Highlights from EHA Mieloma Multiplo

TREATMENT FOR NON-TRANSPLANT ELIGIBLE MULTIPLE MYELOMA

In-depth look at specific data-sets; which ones meet requirements? Individual data owners /cooperative groups

A dose increased once-weekly bortezomib-based combination therapy for multiple myeloma

Unmet Medical Needs and Latest Multiple Myeloma Treatment

Role of Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: The Changing Landscape

Myeloma and renal failure Future directions. Karthik Ramasamy

Multiple Myeloma Updates 2007

Update on Multiple Myeloma Treatment

Current Management of Multiple Myeloma. December 2012 Kevin Song MD FRCPC Leukemia/BMT Program of B.C.

Posttransplantation Maintenance Therapy and Optimal Frontline Therapy in Myeloma

New Treatment Paradigms in Transplant-Eligible Myeloma Patients

In the previous decade, younger patients with newly diagnosed

Choosing upfront and salvage therapy for myeloma in the ASEAN context

Oncologist. The. Academia Pharma Intersect: Myelomas. Multiple Myeloma Treatment Strategies with Novel Agents in 2011: A European Perspective

Optimal maintenance and consolidation therapy for multiple myeloma in actual clinical practice

Experience with bortezomib (Velcade) in multiple myeloma. Peter Černelč Clinical center Ljubljana Department of Haematology

Induction Therapy: Have a Plan. Sagar Lonial, MD Professor, Winship Cancer Institute Director of Translational Research, B-cell Malignancy Program

Consolidation after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantion

Incorporating Novel Agents in the Transplant Setting

Is Myeloma Curable in 2012?

Induction Therapy & Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloma

MAINTENANCE AND CONTINUOUS THERAPY OF MYELOMA. Myeloma Day 11/18/2017 Aric Hall, MD Assistant Professor UW School of Medicine & Public Health

Methods: Studies included in the analysis

MYBORPRE. Protocol Code. Lymphoma, Leukemia/BMT. Tumour Group. Dr. Kevin Song. Contact Physician

Updates in Multiple Myeloma: 12 months in 10 minutes

Autologous Stem Cell Transplanation as First line Treatment? (Against) Joan Bladé Berlin, September 9 th, 2011

MYELOMA MAINTENANCE BEST PRACTICES:

Novel Therapies for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Myeloma update ASH 2014

IMiDs (Immunomodulatory drugs) and Multiple Myeloma

Study Objectives: GMMG MM5

Oncologist. The. Academia Pharma Intersect: Myelomas. Current Multiple Myeloma Treatment Strategies with Novel Agents: A European Perspective

Novel treatment strategies for multiple myeloma: a focus on oral proteasome inhibitors

Effect of cumulative bortezomib dose on survival in multiple myeloma. patients receiving bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone in the phase III

Maintenance therapy in MM has been under investigation

Upfront Therapy for Myeloma Tailoring Therapy across the Disease Spectrum

Ultra High-Risk Myeloma

STUDY DESIGN. VMP 6-week cycles, total of 9 cycles. Figure 2. Alcyone study design. Countries housing study sites are shaded in gold.

Plasma cells in bone marrow. Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Novel Approaches. Approach to Progressive MM. Approach to Initial Therapy

Management of Multiple

A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car- Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Daratumumab: Mechanism of Action

Disclosures for Alessandra Larocca, MD

LONDON CANCER NEWS DRUGS GROUP RAPID REVIEW

Published Ahead of Print on April 3, 2015, as doi: /haematol Copyright 2015 Ferrata Storti Foundation.

Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

Maintenance therapy after autologous transplantation

Management of Multiple Myeloma

Academia Pharma Intersect: Myelomas

AperTO - Archivio Istituzionale Open Access dell'università di Torino

Module 3: Multiple Myeloma Induction and Transplant Strategies Treatment Planning

Therapeutic effects of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients

2015 Updates in Multiple Myeloma

A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car- Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

Pomalidomide (CC4047) Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone as Therapy for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma. Lacy MQ et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(30):

AHFS Final. Criteria Used in. Strength. Grade of. hydrochloride. per day on 12, and mg/m 2 IV. Strength. Grade of. Bortezomib 1.

MULTIPLE MYELOMA. TREATMENT in 2017 MC. VEKEMANS

KEY WORDS: Multiple myeloma, Autologous transplantation, Induction therapy

Post Transplant Maintenance- for everyone? Disclosures

Multiple Myeloma: Treatment Updates

Highlights in multiple myeloma

How to treat a newly diagnosed young patient with multiple myeloma

Multiple Myeloma: Induction, Consolidation and Maintenance Therapy

Transcription:

Key Clinical & Scientific Abstracts from ASH 2010 Dr. Rakesh Popat St. Bartholomew s Hospital London

ASH Day 1

Overview Science: High throughput novel drug assays Genomics: Bortezomib response Neuropathy Cytogenetic Risk: Italian (Cavo) Spanish (Mateos) Dutch/German (Sonneveld) Phase III Clinical Trials: Front line combination lenalidomide therapy in elderly patients s.c. bortezomib Others

Compartment-Specific Bioluminescence Imaging Platform for the Open-Ended Identification of Novel Immunomodulatory Agents and High-Throughput Evaluation of Anti Tumor Immune Function Douglas W. McMillin, Jake Delmore, Matthew W. Vanneman, Robert L. Schlossman, John Feather, Nikhil C. Munshi, Jacob P. Laubach, Paul G Richardson, Glenn Dranoff, Kenneth C. Anderson, and Constantine S. Mitsiades

Methods PBMCs + IL-2 + Imid Luc+ Luc+ Luc+ Luc+ Bioluminescent Signal 384 well plate

Relevance Allows high through-put screening Includes stromal interactions Luc+ cells only assessed Immunomodulatory effects may be investigated: PBMCs enhanced with lenalidomide & pomalidomide whilst inhibited with Dexamethasone CD56+ cells have higher anti-myeloma activity than unselected PBMCs Screening for novel Imids

Improved Outcome with Total Therapy 3 (TT3) Can Be Traced to GEP70-Defined High- Risk Disease with Trisomy of 1q21 and Modest Hyper-Activation of PSMD4 John Shaughnessy, Jr., Pingping Qu, Erming Tian, Bijay Nair, Sarah Waheed, Yazan Alsayed, Frits van Rhee, John Crowley, and Bart Barlogie

Background 70 gene model predicts high risk disease in approx 15% of newly diagnosed patients Driven by copy number sensitive gains in 1q21 Candidate genes within amplificon: IL6R, MCL1, BCL9 CKS1B, PSMD4 Shaughnessy et al. ASH 2010

PSMD4 PSMB5 Point mutations associated with resistance to proteasome inhibition Shaughnessy et al. ASH 2010

Shaughnessy et al. ASH 2010

Results Post bortezomib high risk GEP characterised by increase in proteasome genes Significant overrepresentation of 26 proteasome genes in high risk gene model Shaughnessy et al. ASH 2010

3-copy-like PSMD4 Expression Linked to Improved Outcome in TT3 but not TT2 TT2 TT3 Shaughnessy et al. ASH 2010

Bortezomib overcomes High Risk Associated with 3, but not 4 copies of 1q21 Defined by TRI-FISH TT2 TT3 Shaughnessy et al. ASH 2010

Conclusions GEP changes following a test dose of bortezomib are linked to survival Post bortezomib high risk signature associated with increase in proteasomal genes Improved outcome with TT3 can be correlated with expression of proteasomal genes. High is bad! Proteasomal hyperactivity possibly related to increase copy number of PSMD4 at 1q21 may determine sensitivity to bortezomib Shaughnessy et al. ASH 2010

Development of Bortezomib Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (BiPN) In Multiple Myeloma: Incidence and Molecular Characterization In Newly Diagnosed Patients Treated with Bortezomib Annemiek Broyl, Sophie Corthals, Joost L.M. Jongen, Bronno van der Holt, Rowan Kuiper, Yvonne de Knegt, Laila el Jarari, Uta Bertsch, Henk Lokhorst, Brian GM Durie, Hartmut Goldschmidt, and Pieter Sonneveld

HOVON 65 MM / GMMG-HD4 n=369 MM Stage II or III, Age 18 65 Randomization 3 x VAD 3 x PAD CAD + GCSF CAD + GCSF MEL 200 + PBSCT MEL 200 + PBSCT Depending on local policy for patients PR MEL 200 + PBSCT Allogeneic Tx Depending on local policy for patients PR MEL 200 + PBSCT Thalidomide 50 mg/day for 2 years maintenance Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m 2 /2 weeks for 2 years maintenance

Methods Genetic variation analyzed using a custom-built SNP chip (BOAC) 3404 SNPs selected in "functional regions" within 983 genes Represent cellular functions and pathways. Gene expression profiles analyzed in purified myeloma plasma cells using Affymetrix 133 Plus 2.0 array Integration of GEP with SNP profiles to make an association profile Broyl et al., ASH 2010

Neuropathy Rates Broyl et al., ASH 2010

Results Early-onset bortezomib-induced neuropathy GEP: transcription, apoptosis, AMPK signalling SNP: caspase-9, splicing regulation of NEK4, DNA repair and nervous system development and function Broyl et al., ASH 2010

Results Late onset bortezomib-induced neuropathy: GEP: Development and function of the nervous system (SOD2 and diabetic neuropathy) SNP: SERPINs BRCA1 Broyl et al., ASH 2010

Conclusions Contribution of host and myeloma upon development of neuropathy Early: apotosis Late: inflammation & DNA repair Different results for bortezomib and vincristine Broyl et al., ASH 2010

Bortezomib-Based Induction Treatments Improve Outcomes of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients with High-Risk Cytogenetic Abnormalities Michele Cavo, Sara Bringhen, Carolina Terragna, Paola Omedè, Giulia Marzocchi, Marina Ruggeri, Sandra Durante, Maria Teresa Petrucci, Tommasina Guglielmelli, Giulia Benevolo, Vittorio Montefusco, Franco Narni, Antonietta Falcone, Catello Califano, Anna Baraldi, Silvana Pasini, Piero Galieni, Fortunato Morabito, Mariella Grasso, Daniela Gottardi, Vincenzo Rizzo, Mario Boccadoro, Nicoletta Testoni, and Antonio Palumbo

Newly diagnosed Myeloma n=590 VTD Double Auto SCT VTD n=218 VMP n=181 VMPT n=191 FISH Normal n=261 13qn=175 t(4;14) 17pn=154 Cavo et al., ASH 2010

Results 1. Del(13q) alone had no adverse effect on PFS and OS 2. Presence of t(4;14) and/or del(17p) did not adversely influence PFS, but associated with a shorter OS, due at least in part to a worse outcome after relapse 3. del(17p) alone did not predicted for shorter PFS and OS compared with t(4;14), possibly as a result of the relatively long-term exposure to bortezomib 4. the presence of both del(17p) and t(4;14) was likely to confer a particularly dismal clinical outlook Cavo et al., ASH 2010

VMP vs VTP followed by VT or VP maintenance VMP vs VTP Maintenance arm: Vt vs VP FISH available in 231 patients High risk (n=44): t(4;14) t(14;16) 17p- Standard risk (n=187): without CA CR: 21% vs 27% But shorter PFS and OS in high risk irrespective of induction or maintenance arms Bortezomib in this regimen did not help poor risk Mateos et al., ASH 2010

HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 Trial: PAD vs VAD n=833 PFS/m 3 year OS VAD PAD VAD PAD t(4:14) 18 36 39% 76% 1q21 22 30 59% 83% 17p- 13 26 Improvement in t(4;14), partial improvement in 1q21, poor outcome with 17p-

A Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Combined with Melphalan and Prednisone In Patients 65 Years with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): Continuous Use of Lenalidomide Vs Fixed-Duration Regimens Antonio Palumbo, Michel Delforge, John Catalano, Roman Hajek, Martin Kropff, Maria Teresa Petrucci, Zhinuan Yu, Lindsey Herbein, Jay M. Mei, Christian J. Jacques, and Meletios A. Dimopoulos

A Phase 3 Prospective Randomized International Study (MMY-3021) Comparing Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib In Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Philippe Moreau, Halyna V Pylypenko, Sebastian Grosicki, Evgeniy E Karamanesht, Xavier Leleu, Maria E Grishunina, Grigoriy B Rekhtman, Zvenyslava Masliak, Tadeusz Robak, Anna V Shubina, Jean-Paul Fermand, Martin Kropff, James Cavet, Sudha Parasuraman, Huaibao Feng, Donna M Skee, Helgi van de Velde, William M Deraedt, and Jean-Luc Harousseau

Phase III Trial Design n=222 (53 centers, 10 countries) n=148 Subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m 2 days 1,4,8,11 every 21 days for 8 cycles Administered at 2.5 mg/ml n=74 Intravenous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m 2 days 1,4,8,11 every 21 days for 8 cycles Administered at 1 mg/ml as 3- to 5- second push Cycles 1 4: bortezomib monotherapy After 4 cycles: addition of dex 20 mg (days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9 and 11, 12) if <PR Moreau et al. ASH 2010

Mean bortezomib concentration (ng/ml) Pharmacokinetics Bortezomib IV (n=14) Bortezomib SC (n=17) T max, hours, median (range) 0.08 (0.03 0.5) 2.00 (0.5 24) E max,%, mean (SD) 69.3 (13.2) 63.7 (10.6) AUE 72, %.h, mean (SD) 1383 (767) 1714 (617) 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 IV (n=14) SC (n=17) 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 Time (hours) Moreau et al. ASH 2010

Bortezomib IV (n=73) Bortezomib SC (n=145) Primary endpoint: response after 4 cycles (single agent bortezomib) ORR 42% 42% CR 8% 6% ncr 14% 12% VGP R 16% 17% Bortezomib IV Bortezomib SC Any PN event 53% 38% 0.04 Grade 2 41% 24% 0.01 Grade 3 16% 6% 0.03 6% of patients had at least one SC injection site reaction reported as an AE Moreau et al. ASH 2010

Others Myeloma stem cells Myeloma IX data Pomalidomide Carfilzomib CDK inhibitors

Summary High throughput co-culture model for investigating novel drugs and immunomodulatory agents Genomics for predicting bortezomib response & treatment emergent neuropathy Improvements in survival for high risk myeloma, but 17p- remains poor MPR-R: a new standard of care with lenalidomide maintenance extending PFS s.c bortezomib: same response, less toxicity

Acknowledgements UKMF-Celgene Travel bursary