Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: January 21, 2019 Report Length: 5 Pages

Similar documents
CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: REFERENCE LIST Side Effect Free Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Cancer: Clinical Effectiveness

Clinical Review Report (Sample)

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: June 12, 2018 Report Length: 5 Pages

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: October 30, 2018 Report Length: 7 Pages

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: March 5, 2018 Report Length: 5 Pages

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: July 09, 2018 Report Length: 7 Pages

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: April 4, 2018 Report Length: 14 Pages

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: August 30, 2018 Report Length: 11 Pages

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL

Increasing Frequency of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Test Strips During Pregnancy: A Review of the Clinical and Cost- Effectiveness and Guidelines

DATE: 17 July 2012 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES

CADTH Therapeutic Review

TITLE: Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Acute Injury Transfers: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness, Safety, and Guidelines

TITLE: Discontinuation of Benzodiazepines and Other Sedative-Hypnotic Sleep Medication in Hospitalized Patients: Clinical Evidence and Guidelines

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Benzydamine for Acute Sore Throat: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

TITLE: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Adults with Mental Illness: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Pharmacoeconomic Review Report

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: February 15, 2017 Report Length: 15 Pages

CADTH HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT Screening for Hepatitis C Virus: A Systematic Review

TITLE: Delivery of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Non-Hospital Settings: A Review of the Safety and Guidelines

BRAF Targeted Therapy for Patients with Melanoma and Active Brain Metastases: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness

DATE: 04 April 2012 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: October 18, 2017 Report Length: 20 Pages

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL

Insulin Pens in Acute Care Settings: Clinical Effectiveness, Cost- Effectiveness, and Guidelines

Pharmacoeconomic Review Report

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

TITLE: Use of Bupropion in Patients with Depression and the Associated Risk of Seizures: Safety

TITLE: Montelukast for Sleep Apnea: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness, Cost Effectiveness, and Guidelines

TITLE: Probenecid Dosing When Given with Cefazolin: Guidelines and Clinical Effectiveness

CADTH TECHNOLOGY REVIEW Current Practice Analysis: Interventions for Insomnia Disorder

Health Interventions in Ambulatory Cancer Care Centres DRAFT. Objectives. Methods

TITLE: Type of Thermometer for Inpatients: Clinical-Effectiveness and Guidelines

Orthodontic Treatment for the Management of Pain or Impacted Teeth in Patients with Malocclusion: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: August 31, 2018 Report Length: 10 Pages

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 2.0 Publication Date: November 29, 2018 Report Length: 20 Pages

Common Drug Review Pharmacoeconomic Review Report

CADTH Optimal Use Report

DATE: 09 December 2009 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES:

TITLE: Dose of Electrical Current for Biphasic Defibrillators for Synchronous Cardioversion in Patients with Tachyarrhythmia: Guidelines

TITLE: Immediate Osseointegrated Implants for Cancer Patients: A Review of Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness

TITLE: Critical Incident Stress Debriefing for First Responders: A Review of the Clinical Benefit and Harm

COMPUS OPTIMAL THERAPY REPORT. Supporting Informed Decisions. À l appui des décisions éclairées

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Nabilone for Chronic Pain Management: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

TITLE: Naltrexone for the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence in Individuals with Co- Dependencies: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness

COMPUS OPTIMAL THERAPY REPORT. Supporting Informed Decisions. À l appui des décisions éclairées. Proton Pump Inhibitor Project Overview: Summaries

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

TITLE: Vacuum Boards for Spinal Motion Restriction: Clinical Effectiveness

Title: Re-using the Canister Portion of Metered Dose Inhalers in a Hospital Setting: Clinical Review of Safety, Cost-Effectiveness and Guidelines

TITLE: Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Economic Impact and Existing HTA Recommendations

TITLE: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Autism: A Review of the Clinical and Cost- Effectiveness

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: September 25, 2017 Report Length: 28 Pages

This report will provide a review on the comparative clinical effectiveness and safety between intranasal triamcinolone and beclomethasone.

Title: Scoop Stretcher for Restriction of Spinal Motion: Clinical Effectiveness

TITLE: Closed Catheter Systems for Prevention of Urinary Tract Infections: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness

Behaviour Modification for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence Resulting from Neurogenic Bladder: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

TITLE: Shilla and MAGEC Systems for Growing Children with Scoliosis: A Review of the Clinical Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness

Title: Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurism Repair versus Open Surgery: A Clinical and Cost Effectiveness Review

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: July 19, 2017 Report Length: 66 Pages

Health Interventions in Ambulatory Cancer Care Centres

Date: 23 June Context and policy issues:

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: July 04, 2018 Report Length: 47 Pages

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Final Economic Guidance Report Axitinib (Inlyta) for metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma March 7, 2013

Common Drug Review Pharmacoeconomic Review Report

CADTH Technology Report

CADTH TECHNOLOGY REVIEW Community Water Fluoridation Programs: A Health Technology Assessment Review of Dental Caries and Other Health Outcomes

CADTH OPTIMAL USE REPORT HPV Testing for Primary Cervical Cancer Screening Project Protocol

Title: Parenteral Iron Therapy for Anemia: A Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness Review

TITLE: Cryotherapy Systems for Wart Removal: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness, and Guidelines

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: July 04, 2018 Report Length: 19 Pages

COMPUS Vol 2, Issue 8 December 2008

TITLE: Gabapentin for HIV-associated Neuropathic Pain: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness

TITLE: Memantine in Combination with Cholinesterase Inhibitors for Alzheimer s Disease: Clinical Effectiveness

Inpatient and Outpatient Treatment Programs for Substance Use Disorder: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

TITLE: Australian Sheepskins for the Management of Pressure Ulcers: A Review of the Clinical-Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: December 14, 2018 Report Length: 45 Pages

Clinical Review Report

GUIDANCE FOR SAMPLING ART CLINICS IN COUNTRIES COMBINING SURVEILLANCE OF PRE-TREATMENT HIV DRUG RESISTANCE AND ACQUIRED HIV DRUG RESISTANCE AT 12 AND

Title: Shortened Dental Arch and Restorative Therapies: Evidence for Functional Dentition

TITLE: Dental Loupes for Dental Procedures: A Review of the Clinical and Cost- Effectiveness

TITLE: Optimal Oxygen Saturation Range for Adults Suffering from Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review of Patient Benefit, Harms, and Guidelines

See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.

TITLE: Periodic Dental Examinations for Oral Health: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness, Cost Effectiveness, and Guidelines

Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: September 11, 2017 Report Length: 29 Pages

TITLE: Universal, Community-Based Developmental Screening Tools for Children 6 Years and Younger: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness

Metastatic Melanoma Gap Analysis: Protocol

TITLE: Acetylsalicylic Acid for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: A Review of Clinical Evidence, Benefits and Harms

Title: Ultrasound for Breast Cancer Screening: Clinical Effectiveness. Date: 4 January Context and policy issues:

The epidemiology of HIV in Canada

TITLE: Abuse and Misuse Potential of Dimenhydrinate: A Review of the Clinical Evidence

DATE: 10 February 2016 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES

Transcription:

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: REFERENCE LIST Topical Cantharidin/ Salicylic Acid/ Podophyllin for the Treatment of Warts: Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: January 21, 2019 Report Length: 5 Pages

Authors: Ke Xin Li, Robyn Butcher Cite As: Topical Cantharidin/ Salicylic Acid/ Podophyllin for the Treatment of Warts: Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines. Ottawa: CADTH; 2019 Jan. (CADTH rapid response report: reference list). Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help Canadian health care decision-makers, health care professionals, health systems leaders, and policy-makers make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. While patients and others may access this document, the document is made available for informational purposes only and no representations or warranties are made with respect to its fitness for any particular purpose. The information in this document should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice or as a substitute for the application of clinical judgment in respect of the care of a particular patient or other professional judgment in any decision-making process. The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) does not endorse any information, drugs, therapies, treatments, products, processes, or services. While care has been taken to ensure that the information prepared by CADTH in this document is accurate, complete, and up-to-date as at the applicable date the material was first published by CADTH, CADTH does not make any guarantees to that effect. CADTH does not guarantee and is not responsible for the quality, currency, propriety, accuracy, or reasonableness of any statements, information, or conclusions contained in any third-party materials used in preparing this document. The views and opinions of third parties published in this document do not necessarily state or reflect those of CADTH. CADTH is not responsible for any errors, omissions, injury, loss, or damage arising from or relating to the use (or misuse) of any information, statements, or conclusions contained in or implied by the contents of this document or any of the source materials. This document may contain links to third-party websites. CADTH does not have control over the content of such sites. Use of third-party sites is governed by the third-party website owners own terms and conditions set out for such sites. CADTH does not make any guarantee with respect to any information contained on such third-party sites and CADTH is not responsible for any injury, loss, or damage suffered as a result of using such third-party sites. CADTH has no responsibility for the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information by third-party sites. Subject to the aforementioned limitations, the views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of Health Canada, Canada s provincial or territorial governments, other CADTH funders, or any third-party supplier of information. This document is prepared and intended for use in the context of the Canadian health care system. The use of this document outside of Canada is done so at the user s own risk. This disclaimer and any questions or matters of any nature arising from or relating to the content or use (or misuse) of this document will be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein, and all proceedings shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Province of Ontario, Canada. The copyright and other intellectual property rights in this document are owned by CADTH and its licensors. These rights are protected by the Canadian Copyright Act and other national and international laws and agreements. Users are permitted to make copies of this document for non-commercial purposes only, provided it is not modified when reproduced and appropriate credit is given to CADTH and its licensors. About CADTH: CADTH is an independent, not-for-profit organization responsible for providing Canada s health care decision-makers with objective evidence to help make informed decisions about the optimal use of drugs, medical devices, diagnostics, and procedures in our health care system. Funding: CADTH receives funding from Canada s federal, provincial, and territorial governments, with the exception of Quebec. REFERENCE LIST Topical Cantharidin/ Salicylic Acid/ Podophyllin for the Treatment of Warts 2

Table 1: Selection Criteria Population Intervention Comparator Outcomes Study Designs Research Questions 1. What is the comparative clinical effectiveness of topical cantharidin/salicylic acid/podophyllin versus other topical treatments for warts? 2. What are the evidence-based guidelines for the topical treatment of warts? Key Findings One non-randomized study and two evidence-based guidelines were identified regarding topical cantharidin/ salicylic acid/ podophyllin for the treatment of warts. Methods A limited literature search was conducted on key resources including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) databases, Embase, Canadian and major international health technology agencies, as well as a focused Internet search. No filters were applied to limit the retrieval by study type. Where possible, retrieval was limited to the human population. The search was also limited to English language documents published between January 1, 2014 and January 11, 2019. Internet links were provided, where available. Selection Criteria One reviewer screened citations and selected studies based on the inclusion criteria presented in Table 1. Adults and children (all ages) with wart(s) Topical cantharidin/salicylic acid/podophyllin [the product name is Cantharone-plus] Q1: Any comparator Q2: No comparator Q1: Clinical effectiveness, time to cure, safety Q2: Guidelines Health technology assessments, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized studies, evidence-based guidelines REFERENCE LIST Topical Cantharidin/ Salicylic Acid/ Podophyllin for the Treatment of Warts 3

Results Rapid Response reports are organized so that the higher quality evidence is presented first. Therefore, health technology assessment reports, systematic reviews, and metaanalyses are presented first. These are followed by randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized studies, and evidence-based guidelines. One non-randomized study and two evidence-based guidelines were identified regarding topical cantharidin/ salicylic acid/ podophyllin for the treatment of warts. No relevant health technology assessments, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or randomized controlled trials were identified. Additional references of potential interest are provided in the appendix. Health Technology Assessments Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Randomized Controlled Trials Non-Randomized Studies 1. Ghonemy S. Treatment of recalcitrant plantar warts with long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser versus cantharidin-podophylline resin-salicylic acid. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2017 Oct;19(6):347-352. PubMed: PM28489473 Guidelines and Recommendations 2. Clinical Effectiveness Group. UK National Guidelines on the management of anogenital warts. Macclesfield (GB); British Association for Sexual Health and HIV; 2015: https://www.bashh.org/documents/uk%20national%20guideline%20on%20warts%202 015%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed 2019 Jan 17. 3. Sterling JC, Gibbs S, Haque Hussain SS, Mohd Mustapa MF, Handfield-Jones SE. British Association of Dermatologists' guidelines for the management of cutaneous warts 2014. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171(4):696-712. REFERENCE LIST Topical Cantharidin/ Salicylic Acid/ Podophyllin for the Treatment of Warts 4

Appendix Further Information Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses No Comparator 4. Vakharia PP, Chopra R, Silverberg NB, Silverberg JI. Efficacy and Safety of Topical Cantharidin Treatment for Molluscum Contagiosum and Warts: A Systematic Review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018 01 Dec;19(6):791-803. Review Articles 5. Cantharidin: a comprehensive review of the clinical literature. Dermatol Online J. 2014 Jun 15;20(6) https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2886/e7e249cdedd27430ee08578be94e8af2be1a.pdf REFERENCE LIST Topical Cantharidin/ Salicylic Acid/ Podophyllin for the Treatment of Warts 5