Going the distance: Conformable Gore TAG device demonstrates durable outcomes over the long. D.Böckler University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany

Similar documents
European Experience with a New Thoracic Device. D.Böckler University Hospital Heidelberg Germany

Is a Paradigm Shift towards Early Endovascular Treatment of Type B Dissection justified?

Performance of the conformable GORE TAG device in Type B aortic dissection from the GORE GREAT real world registry

Management of intramural hematoma and penetrating ulcers - what is different? D.Böckler University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany

Santi Trimarchi, MD, PhD Vascular Surgeon Thoracic Aortic Research Center, Director IRCCS Policlinico San Donato University of Milan

Introducing the GORE TAG Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL System

Arch Repair with the Bolton Medical RelayBranch Thoracic Stent-graft system: Multicenter experience

Role of Gender in TEVAR and EVAR results from the GREAT registry

Type 1a Endoleak in hostile neck anatomies: Endoanchor can fix it! D. Böckler University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany

Technique and Outcome of Laser Fenestration For Arch Vessels

Treatment of complex thoracic cases Focus on the new Gore Active Control TAG device

Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after EVAR Longterm results from the ENGAGE Registry

Challenges with Complex Anatomies Advancing Care in Endovascular Aortic Treatment

Indications for use. Contraindications within the United States

THE THE MORE MORE NATURAL APPROACH TO OPTIMAL FIT

GORE TAG Thoracic Endoprosthesis ANNUAL CLINICAL UPDATE SEPTEMBER 2018 Abstract. Section I GORE TAG Device Clinical experience. Section II Conformable

How to achieve a successful proximal sealing in TEVAR? Pr L Canaud

RETROGRADE BRANCH. Gustavo S. Oderich MD Professor of Surgery Director of Endovascular Therapy Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

ADSORB trial results: Is it enough to switch the paradigm?

Early Clinical Results with the Valiant Mona LSA Branch Stent-Graft

Management of Acute Aortic Syndromes. M. Grabenwoger, MD Dept. of Cardiovascular Surgery Hospital Hietzing, Vienna, Austria

Endoanchor-assisted TEVAR

Abdominal and thoracic aneurysm repair

Treatment options of late failures of EVAS. Michel Reijnen Rijnstate Arnhem The Netherlands

Clinical experience with a new thoracic stent graft system (Ankura TM ). Procedural analysis, 30 days and 6-month results in a single center study

UC SF. Disclosures. Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair 4/24/2009. Management of Acute Dissections: Is There Still a Role for Open Surgery?

Understanding the Predictors of Aneurysmal Degeneration in Type B Dissection

La sindrome aortica acuta oggi

Mid-term results from ANCHOR: How does this data influence the treatment algorithm for hostile EVAR anatomies

Standardization of the CHEVAR procedure: How a standard approach has improved outcomes. Prof Peter Holt St George s, London

My personal experience with INCRAFT in standard and challenging cases

Neurological Complications of TEVAR. Frank J Criado, MD. Union Memorial-MedStar Health Baltimore, MD USA

Optimal Treatment of Chronic Dissection

The Petticoat Technique Managing Type B Dissection with both Early and Long Term Considerations

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) Indications and Basic Procedure

Development of a Branched LSA Endograft & Ascending Aorta Endograft

Life after EVAR 1? The value of open repair for some patients reappears. D. Böckler University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany

Jean M Panneton, MD Professor of Surgery Program Director Vascular Surgery Chief EVMS. Arch Pathology: The Endovascular Era is here

Percutaneous Approaches to Aortic Disease in 2018

Combined Endovascular and Surgical Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Pathology: Hybrid TEVAR

The Auckland Experience with the Nellix EVAS System. Andrew Holden, MBChB, FRANZCR

Challenges. 1. Sizing. 2. Proximal landing zone 3. Distal landing zone 4. Access vessels 5. Spinal cord ischemia 6. Endoleak

Re-interventions after TEVAR:

GORE EXCLUDER AAA Endoprosthesis demonstrates long-term durability. Michel Reijnen Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, The Netherlands

Pioneering EVAR techniques in aortic dissection

Clinical Trials of Acute and Chronic Dissections. Gregory Landry MD

The Role of Stent-Grafts in Marfan Syndrome

Global Evidence for the Treatment of Type B Aortic Dissection

Three year experience with multilayer stent in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aneurysms no evidence for aneurysm stabilization

OPEN REOPERATIONS FOR COMPLICATIONS OF ENDOVASCULAR AORTIC PROCEDURES: TIP OF THE ICEBERG?

Treating very short necks ( 4mm <10mm) using the Endurant stent graft + EndoAnchors: 1-year results and current insights

Low profile TEVAR: is it an added value? Michel Bosiers, G. Torsello Münster

Objective assessment of current stent grafts: which graft for which lesion. Ludovic Canaud, MD, PhD Pierre Alric, MD, PhD Montpellier, France

Aortic Neck Issues Associated Clinical Sequelae/Implications for Graft Choice

Access More Patients. Customize Each Seal.

Conflicts of Interest. When and Why Complex EVAR in Tx of juxta/suprarenal AAA? Summary. Infrarenal EVAR for short necks 2y postop

Ascending Aorta: How I Do It.

When to use standard EVAR with EndoAnchors or CHEVAR in short-neck AAAs LINC ASIA 18

Durable outcomes. Proven performance.

Insights from the PROTAGORAS/PERICLES Registries: impact on ChEVAR results

Development of Stent Graft. Kato et al. Development of an expandable intra-aortic prothesis for experimental aortic dissection.

No Neck Is Needed! Treat the Aneurysm Instead! Andrew Holden, MD Associate Professor of Radiology Auckland City Hospital

14F OD Ovation Abdominal Stent Graft System

UC SF Early Intervention in Type B Dissection: Results From the INSTEAD XL Trial. Acute Type B Dissection. Outline. Disclosures.

EVAR Revision Setting - How can Heli-FX EndoAnchors improve the outcomes?

Title. Different arch branched devices are available, is morphology the. main criteria of choice? Ciro Ferrer, MD

Patient selection in Hostile Necks and how. to prevent endoleaks a word of caution

Improving Endograft Durability with EndoAnchors

Influence of patient selection and IFU compliance on outcomes following EVAS

Optimizing Accuracy of Aortic Stent Grafts in Short Necks

DISCLOSURES ISOLATED DTA LESION? TYPE B DISSECTIONS TREATMENT OPTIONS

Animesh Rathore, MD 4/21/17. Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of aorta

Preliminary Data from the Gore EXCLUDER Thoracoabdominal Branch Endoprosthesis Early Feasibility Study

How to Categorize the Infrarenal Neck Properly? I Van Herzeele Dept. Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ghent University, Belgium

UC SF An Algorithm to Choose Which Uncomplicated (Asymptomatic) Acute Type B Dissection Patients Should Undergo TEVAR. Disclosures.

Anatomical applicability of current off-the-shelf branched endografts in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms managed by open surgery.

FLEXIBLE, BALOON EXPANDABLE

Endo-Bentall: Fact or Fiction?

Endovascular Management of Thoracic Aortic Pathology Stéphan Haulon, J Sobocinski, B Maurel, T Martin-Gonzalez, R Spear, A Hertault, R Azzaoui

Mechanisms of and treatment strategies for dsine after TEVAR for acute and chronic type B aortic dissection- insights from EuREC.

EXPERIENCE AFTER 500 ENDOLUMINAL STENT GRAFTS. DEVICES SPECIFIC OUTCOME AND LESSONS LEARNED.

Ovation. Sean Lyden, MD Department Chair, Vascular Surgery Cleveland Clinic

No Disclosure. Aortic Dissection in Japan. This. The Challenge of Acute and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissections with Endovascular Aortic Repair

How to select FEVAR versus EVAR + endoanchors in short-necked AAAs

Ascending Aorta: Is The Endovascular Approach Realistic?

Taming The Aorta. David Minion, MD Program Director, Vascular Surgery University of Kentucky Medical Center Lexington, Kentucky, USA

Endovascular Stent Grafts for Disorders of the Thoracic Aorta

EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) with Nellix

Talent Abdominal Stent Graft

Endovascular Repair o Abdominal. Aortic Aneurysms. Cesar E. Mendoza, M.D. Jackson Memorial Hospital Miami, Florida

Endovascular treatment of aortic arch using Relay branched stent grafts

Aortic stents, types, selection, tricks in deployment.

I have the following financial relationships to disclose:

Changing Spectrum of Re-Interventions following TEVAR. 31 st Annual Florida Vascular Society. PENN Surgery

Thoracic aortic trauma A.T.O.ABDOOL-CARRIM ACADEMIC HEAD VASCULAR SURGERY DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY UNIVERSITY OF WITWATERSRAND

Current State of Thoracic Branch Devices and Ongoing Clinical Trials

Jean M. Panneton, MD, FRCSC, FACS. Professor of Surgery, Chief & Program Director Division of Vascular Surgery. Norfolk, VA

Hostile Neck During EVAR, The Role Of Endoanchores

Bilateral use of the Gore IBE device for bilateral CIA aneurysms and a first interim analysis of the prospective Iceberg registry

Reduction in cardiovascular related adverse events following active sac management with Nellix vs. EVAR: Are there biological advantages?

Transcription:

Going the distance: Conformable Gore TAG device demonstrates durable outcomes over the long D.Böckler University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany

Disclosures Speaker name: Dittmar Böckler I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report: Consulting Employment in industry Stockholder of a healthcare company Owner of a healthcare company Research Grant I do not have any potential conflict of interest

Launch: October 2009 100.000 Implants worldwide

Concept of CTAG FDA-approved to treat various thoracic aortic pathologies

Concept: Device Modifications Design Size - Configurations

Concept - Oversizing windows for different pathologies Aortic diameter 31mm: TAG 34 mm Aortic diameter 31mm: CTAG 34 / 37 / 40mm CTAG - engineered for 6-33% oversizing conditions IMH with 31 mm > CTAG 34 mm = 10 % Oversizing TAA with 31 mm > CTAG 37 mm = 20 % Ovversizing

4-5 Years Results with CTAG (mean 2 yrs.) Prospective Multicentre Regulatory US- Study 1 Prospective Multicentre Europen Registry 2 GREAT Registry unpublished Single Center Experience 2 Heidelberg Experience (407 devices/163 pat.) unpublished HUMAN STUDY eissn 2325-4416 Med Sci Monit Basic Res, 2015; 21: 262-270 DOI: 10.12659/MSMBR.897010 Received: Accepted: Published: Device Conformabilit y and Morphological Assessment Af t er TEVAR for Aortic Type B Dissect ion: A Single-Cent re Experience with a Conformable Thoracic Stent-Graf t Design 2015.12.07 2015.12.20 2015.12.31 Authors Contribution: Study Design A Data Collection B Statistical Analysis C Data Interpretation D Manuscript Preparation E Literature Search F Funds Collection G ABCDEF 1 BCD 2 BEF 1 EF 1 ACDE 1 Corresponding Author: Source of support: Background: Material/Methods: Results: 1Jordan Moritz S. Bischoff Matthias Müller-Eschner Katrin Meisenbacher Andreas S. Peters Dittmar Böckler 1 Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany 2 Department of Radiodiagnostics and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany Dittmar Böckler, e-mail: dittmar.boeckler@med.uni-heidelberg.de Departmental sources The aim of this study was to analyze device conformability in TEVARof acute and chronic (a/c) type B aortic dissections (TBAD) using the Gore Conformab le Thoracic Aortic Stent-graft (CTAG). From January 1997 to February 2014, a total of 90 out of 405 patients in our center received TEVARfor TBAD. Since November 2009, 23 patients (16 men; median age: 62 years) were treated with the CTAG. Indications were complicated atbad in 15 (65%) and expanding ctbad in 8 (35%) patients. Primary endpoints were the assessment of device conformability by measuring the distance (D) from the radiopaque gold band marker (GM) at the proximal CTAG end to the inner curvature (IC) of the arch on parasagittal multiplanar reformations of CT angiography, as well as the evaluation of aortic diameter changes following TEVAR. Median follow-up was 13.3 months (range: 2 days to 35 months). Primary and secondary success rates were 91.3%(21/23) and 95.6%(22/23), respectively. There was 1 type Ia endoleak, retrograde dissection or primary conversion was not observed. Median GM-IC-D was 0 mm (range: 0 mm to 10 mm). GM-IC-Dwas associated with zone 2 placement compared to zone 3 (P=0.036). There was no association between GM-IC-D formation and arch type. In atbad cases the true lumen significantly increased after TEVAR(P=0.017) and the false lumen underwent shrinkage (P=0.025). In ctbad patients the false lumen decreased after TEVAR(P=0.036). The CTAGshows favorable conformability and wall apposition in challenging arch pathologies such as TBAD., JVS 2015, 2Böckler EJVES 2016, 3 Bischoff Med Sci Research 2015, 3Böckler,Endovascular Today 2014 Conclusions: MeSH Keywords: Aneurysm, Dissecting Cardiovascular Diseases Endovascular Procedures

CTAG 08-03 Aneurysm Study (USA) 1 Jordan W et al., JVS 2015:61:589-95 8 sites: 66 patients all aneurysms (DTAA) Oct 2009- Sept. 2011 30 d results: Mortality 1.5 % Any SAE 23 % Paraplegia 2 % Stroke 2 % 2 yrs. results Type Ia Endoleak 3.2 % TAA rupture 0 % 5 mm decrease 86%

Aneurysm Related Survival: 97% (n=2) 1 rupture of ascending aneurysm 1 arterial access rupture for secondary intervention both separate from procedure 1 Jordan W et al., JVS 2015:61:589-95

European Prospective CTAG Registry 5 sites: 100 patients 56 TAA, 32 B-Diss., 4 Trauma 30 day Results Technical success 92 % Mortality 3.3% Complication rate 34 % Stroke rate 11% 2 yr. Results Overall survival 74% - Elective 80% - Emergency 62% Böckler, Brunkwall, Taylor, Mangilardi, Larzon EJVES. 2016;51: 791-800

Technical Results Device deployment 100 % Accuracy deployment 99 % Conformability 95 % Böckler, Brunkwall, Taylor, Mangilardi, Larzon EJVES. 2016;51: 791-800

Predicting Risk Factors for Death and SAE Böckler, Brunkwall, Taylor, Mangilardi, Larzon EJVES. 2016;51: 791-800

GREAT - Real World Registry

GREAT - Real World Registry

GREAT - Real World Registry (n=133 through 2 years follow up) 2 Type Ia endoleaks 4 Type Ib endoleaks 2 type II endoleaks 1 migration 3% device related re-intervention through 2 yr. FU 8% death rate though 2 year follow up

Device Conformability HUMAN STUDY eissn 2325-4416 Med Sci Monit Basic Res, 2015; 21: 262-270 DOI: 10.12659/MSMBR.897010 2.07 2.20 2.31 Device Conformability and Morphological Assessment After TEVAR for Aortic Type B Dissection: A Single-Centre Experience with a Conformable Thoracic Stent-Graft Design n: A B C D E F G ABCDEF 1 BCD 2 BEF 1 EF 1 ACDE 1 nding Author: Moritz S. Bischoff Matthias Müller-Eschner Katrin Meisenbacher Andreas S. Peters Dittmar Böckler Dittmar Böckler, e-mail: dittmar.boeckler@med.uni-heidelberg.de 1 Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany 2 Department of Radiodiagnostics and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany Apposition to inner wall 100% N = 1 (5,0%) N = 13 (65,0%) N = 6 (30,0%) No association between apposition and arch type 21/23) and 95.6% (22/23), respectively. There was 1 type Ia endoleak, retrograde dissection or primary conversion was not observed. Median GM-IC-D was 0 mm (range: 0 mm to 10 mm). GM-IC-D was associated with zone 2 placement compared to zone 3 (P=0.036). There was no association between GM-IC-D formation and arch type. In atbad cases the true lumen significantly increased after TEVAR (P=0.017) and the false lumen underwent shrinkage (P=0.025). In ctbad patients the false lumen decreased after TEVAR(P=0.036). Conclusions: The CTAG shows favorable conformability and wall in challenging arch pathologies such as TBAD. Less apposition in LZ 2 versus 3 (p=0.03) Keywords: Aneurysm, Dissecting Cardiovascular Diseases Endovascular Procedures ull-text PDF: http://www.basic.medscimonit.com/abstract/index/idart/897010 2872 5 2 34 3 BischofffM, Blckler D, Med Sci Research 2015,

TEVAR Heidelberg (n=487) March 1997 Oct 2016 Total elektiv Notfall Thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) 80 61 (76.3) 19 (23.7) Sept. 2010 Sept. 2016 Ruptured TAA 30-30 (100.0) Thoracoabdominal aneurysm 74 50 (67.5 24 (33.5) 163 patients (male 58%, mean age 66 yrs.) Penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) 65 32 (49.2) 33 (60.8) Traumatic aortic rupture 26-26 (100.0) Chronic Typ B dissection 49 36 (71.4) 13 (28.6) 407 CTAG devices (verage 2.5 / patients) Acute Typ B dissection 45 13 (28.8) 32 (71.2) Intramural haematoma (IMH) 26 14 (53.8) 12 (46.2) Mean 2.5 devices p.p. Type A dissection 5 1 (20.0) 4 (80.0) Aortobronchial fistula 7 1 (14.3) 6 (85.7) Ruptured Patch-aneurysm 3 1 (33.3) 2 (66.7) 83 % Arch involvment (Zone 0-3) Patch-aneurysm 7 5 (71.4) 2 (28.6) Anastomotic aneurysm 7 5 (85.7) 2 (14.3)

Indications for TEVAR with CTAG Sept. 2010 Sept. 2016 Indication N Acute type B-Dissection 35 PAU 27 TAA* 19 TAAA 18 IMH 17 Traumatic rupture 10 CEAD** 10 rtaa 7 ABF 5 Anastomotic 5 Aneurysm Acute Type A Dissection 3 Posttraumatic TAA 2 Patchaneurysm 2 Patchrupture 1 Corpus alienum 1 (Palakossporn) Symptomatic Aortic Thrombus 1

Heidelberg Single Center 6 yr Experience 30 day Results: Technical success 97,5 % Mortality 3.3% Follow up Results: Reintervention rate 21 % Overall mortality (43/166) 26 % Aortic related mortality 8/166) 5 %

Advantages - Personal Opinion Oversizing windows for each pathology Unsheated device very flexible for arch and tortous anatomy easy access for multiple devices Highly confomable in the arch Fast or slow deployment 1 Jordan, JVS 2015, 2 Böckler EJVES 2016, 3 Bischoff Med Sci Research 2015, 3 Böckler,Endovascular Today 2014

Example of Complex Arch Morphology

Future Refinements of the CTAG Branched technology Steering delivery system to enhance control and vessel wall Partial deployment Partial deployment All products are under development and not available or approved for sale in any market.

Conclusions Concept is proven in the long run Modifications of CTAG increased conformability CTAG shows very favorable results at mean 2 years No device failures, low major device events CTAG is our prefered device for aortic arch pathologies Continued FU over the next 5 yrs. will be important

Going the distance: Conformable Gore TAG device demonstrates durable outcomes over the long D.Böckler University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany