EHR Usage Among PAs. Trends and implications for PAs. April 2019 A Report from the 2018 AAPA PA Practice Survey

Similar documents
E-Prescribing, EPCS & PDMP: An Update

How Doctors Feel About Electronic Health Records. National Physician Poll by The Harris Poll

SIM HIT Assessment. Table 1: Practice Capacity to Support Data Elements

Electronic Health Records and Electronic Practice Management Systems Hot Topics Survey Results

2014 AUA Annual Census

Results of the 2016 Gender Equality in the Legal Profession Survey

Electronic Health Records:

Agenda. Immunization Registry Reporting in Community Health Centers. Presented by: Ben Pierson Program Manager Health Information Exchange

Electronic Health Records Survey 2012 Report

Florida PDMP User Survey Methodology

Abstract. Introduction. Providers stand to lose $1.15 billion in CMS reimbursements under MU

Study of Hospice-Hospital Collaborations

Colorado EHR Incentive Program By the Numbers

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet

Depression in the Workplace: Detailed Analysis of TBGH s 2016 Survey of Texas Employers. November 28, 2016

AARP/American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)

Coping with GERD Survey Results

2012 EHR Donation Program ELIGIBILITY FORM

Americans Views on Vaccines and Infectious Disease Outbreaks

The National Vaccine Advisory Committee: Reducing Patient and Provider Barriers to Maternal Immunizations

Dynamic Chiropractic s NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENT SURVEY

Texas ereferral Project with Lonestar Circle of Care, NextGen, Alere Wellbeing and University of Texas at Austin Update Date: October 2014

PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION CSHCN SERVICES PROGRAM PROVIDER MANUAL

CARP Physician Salary Poll Report June 4, 2012

Unrestricted Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., 2017

State of Connecticut Department of Education Division of Teaching and Learning Programs and Services Bureau of Special Education

CMS-3311-P 100 TABLE 6: MEANINGFUL USES OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES FOR 2015 THROUGH 2017

Nutritional Supplement Survey II Doctor/Patient Interactions. Executive Summary. A Research Report by

Denmark Editors: LEO Innovation Lab and The Happiness Research Institute Copenhagen, Denmark, October 2018

Study on clinical practice guidelines in Estonia

HFMA SURVEY: Electronic Health Records and Meaningful Use. August 2013

Survey of Public Housing Authorities and Tobacco Use Policies in New York State Capital District Tobacco-Free Coalition


2016 Medicaid Adult CAHPS 5.0H. At-A-Glance Report

Speech Recognition + EHRs. Industry Brief

Brazil Editors: LEO Innovation Lab and The Happiness Research Institute Copenhagen, Denmark, October 2018

The City of El Cerrito, California

DENOMINATOR: All patients aged 18 years and older seen for at least two visits or at least one preventive visit during the measurement period

Language Access Plan Basics

HIPAA FOR THE DENTAL PRACTICE

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS 3000 ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS OTHER THAN AUDITS OR REVIEWS OF HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION CONTENTS

(City, State, Zip Code)

Electronic Health Record Effects on Work-Life Balance and Burnout Within the I 3 Population Collaborative

Neighbourhood Connections report on the 2016 External Partner Survey

Complex just became comfortable.

Evidence-Based Practice Fidelity Site Visit Tools

Note: This is an authorized excerpt from 2016 Healthcare Benchmarks: Digital Health To download the entire report, go to

Portugal Editors: LEO Innovation Lab and The Happiness Research Institute Copenhagen, Denmark, October 2018

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

Andrology Lab. Main Campus Patient Experience November Market Research & Planning. Amanda Beacher 216/

3/20/2013. "ICD-10 Update Understanding and Analyzing GEMs" March 10, 2013

DENOMINATOR: All female patients aged 65 years and older with a visit during the measurement period

MEMO. Representatives of all respondent groups see a primary impact of the DVCM position being increased offender accountability.

Framework Partners Incorporated

Member-centered cancer care In Georgia

United Kingdom Editors:

Denominator Criteria (Eligible Cases): Patient encounter during the performance period (CPT): 78300, 78305, 78306, 78315, 78320

DENOMINATOR: All female patients aged 65 years and older with a visit during the measurement period

This report summarizes the stakeholder feedback that was received through the online survey.

1. MSW Field practice (internship)

Sacred Heart University Institute for Public Policy

37 th ANNUAL JP MORGAN HEALTHCARE CONFERENCE

Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2006 Member Survey Overall Report. Prepared by

Student Survey Oct: Specialty Services, Campus Safety

Huber, Gregory A. and John S. Lapinski "The "Race Card" Revisited: Assessing Racial Priming in

ICD-10 Implementation: From ICD-10? to I Can Do-10!

EHR SOFTWARE COMPARISON

50 Scales LIKERT SCALE SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL SCALE A GENERAL NOTE ON SCALE FORMAT OTHER OPTIONS

SNS Client Dashboard Data Survey Questions

Project: Date: Presented by: Siegel HR

Positive Responses Neutral Responses Negative Responses Do Not Know/No Basis to Judge

Supplemental materials for:

Note: This is an authorized excerpt from 2016 Healthcare Benchmarks: Population Health Management. To download the entire report, go to

Alliance for Aging Research Key Findings from Public Survey on Early Alzheimer's Diagnosis

Measure #155 (NQF: 0101): Falls: Plan of Care National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

The MetroHealth System. Creating the HIT Organizational Culture at MetroHealth. Creating the HIT Organizational Culture

Parents Experiences During School Closures Due to H1N1 in High Closure Areas

Nova Scotia Board of Examiners in Psychology. Custody and Access Evaluation Guidelines

Effective Strategies to Help Customers Use Their EHR to Improve Quality of Care

Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule for CY 2018 Appropriate Use Criteria for Advanced Diagnostic Imaging Services Summary

See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.

SECTION PRESCRIPTIONS

2011 Parent Survey Report

Increasing the Cigarette Tax Rate in Wyoming to Maintain State Programs: An AARP Survey

Summary Partner feedback survey Keystone 2012 Cordaid results

The Correlation of Training Duration. Implications for Meaningful Use. americanehr.com. A Report From AmericanEHR Partners October 2011

Indiana Pressler Memorial Chapter

Feedback- Information-Exchange (AFIX) and the Vaccines for Children (VFC) Program to Improve the Quality of Site Visits in New York City

Identifying Hypertension and Diabetes by Mastering IT

This Material is Copyright Protected

HEES for Spanish- Speaking Customers

Russia Editors: LEO Innovation Lab and The Happiness R s esearch Institute Copenhagen, Denmark, October 2018

2017 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

2/21/

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Findings:

PROCEDURE Mental Capacity Act. Number: E 0503 Date Published: 20 January 2016

This is a two-part measure which is paired with Measure #154: Falls: Risk Assessment.

Supplementary Online Content

Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Review of Historical Financial Statements

Transcription:

EHR Usage Among PAs Trends and implications for PAs April 2019 A Report from the 2018 AAPA PA Practice Survey

Contents Methodology... 2 Measures... 2 Notes about the Data... 2 Executive Summary... 3 Data Tables... 5 Table 1. EHR Access... 5 Table 2. EHR Effective Use... 5 Table 3. Target of EHR Limitations... 5 Table 4. Possibility of EHR Modifications to Remove Barriers for PAs... 5 Table 5. Who Can Carry Out System Changes... 6 Table 6. EHR Restrictions: Employer Policy or EHR System Constraints... 6 Table 7. PA Involvement in EHR Customization... 6 Table 8. EHR System Produced Reports About PA Services... 6 Table 9. Reports Are Based Solely on Claims Submitted Under PA Name/NPI... 6 Table 10. PA Training in the Use of EHR System... 7 Table 11. PA Formal Training in the Use of EHR System... 7 Table 12. EHR Systems Used by PAs... 7 Table 13. Satisfaction with EHR System... 7 Table 14. Satisfaction with EHR System... 8 Table 15. Electronic Exchange of Clinical Information... 9 Table 16. Barriers to Electronic Information Exchange... 9 Table 17. Time Spent Documenting Clinical Care Outside Office Hours... 10 Table 18. Staff Support in Documenting Clinical Care... 10 Table 19. Time Spent Documenting Clinical Care Outside Office Hours... 10 Table 20. Perceptions About EHR System... 11 Copyright 2019 AAPA. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise without the express written permission of AAPA. 1 P age

Methodology Data were collected in a survey sent to a random sample of 8,678 PAs and PA students, with a response rate of 11.5%. A total of 725 PAs responded to the survey. The overall margin of error is +/- 3.6% at the 95% confidence level. Response rates and margins of error vary by section and breakout. Data contained within this report represent PA respondents only. Measures Only data based on 5 or more respondents are included. On the tables that follow: Median is the 50th percentile; i.e., 50 percent of responses are above the median and 50 percent are below the median. N refers to the number of respondents and is generally the first column in the data tables. % refers to the percent of respondents who provided a given response. Notes about the Data The results of this survey are not intended for public release without prior approval from AAPA Research. 2 P age

Executive Summary PAs often cite Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems as a barrier to work-life balance. Despite many benefits, PAs also view EHRs as a new bureaucratic part of healthcare that causes additional workload for PAs and other medical providers. In fact, more than one in four PAs (26.3%; Table 17) surveyed by AAPA recently indicated that they spend more than two hours per day outside of their normal office hours documenting clinical care in their EHR system. Further, more than four in five PAs (81.6%; Table 18) do not have staff support, such as a scribe, to assist in this documentation. With EHR systems the new normal in healthcare, it is important to understand where strengths and weaknesses exist, as well as to identify PA-specific barriers that should be considered and eased. More than 3 in 4 PAs believe EHRs improve quality of care and medication errors The Good News about EHRs Not all opinions are negative when it comes to EHRs, as PAs overwhelmingly agree about several EHR benefits (Table 15). PAs strongly or somewhat agree that the electronic exchange of information to providers outside of their practice improves their practice s quality of care (82.6%), increases their practice s efficiency (77.5%), prevents medication errors (75.0%), enhances care coordination (82.8%), and reduces duplicate test ordering (74.9%). The widespread adoption of EHRs appears to be mitigating some of these very real concerns providers have. Providers also seem to agree that the exchange of EHR information is useful. Half of PAs say the time spent documenting clinical care reduces their time with patients The Bad News about EHRs But current views on the state of EHR systems are not all good (Table 16). This may be due to technological challenges, with more than two in three PAs (68.3%) noting the difficulty of electronic exchange with providers who are using a different EHR vendor. Other challenges pertain to the patient experience itself. Half (51.3%; Table 20) of PAs say the amount of time spent documenting clinical care reduces the amount of time spent with patients. There are other logistical barriers for PAs to effectively utilize EHR systems; some of these may stem from the ways in which EHRs are implemented and used. 3 P age

According to a 2018 AAPA survey of 10 of the top ambulatory and inpatient EHR vendors, while most vendors indicated their software offers full functionality for PAs and makes no distinction in access or use between PAs and other providers, PAs continue to encounter barriers to effective use resulting from the design of the EHR. Three vendors surveyed by AAPA Epic, Allscripts, and NextGen may allow a physician to modify a PA s clinical documentation. More than two in five PAs (41.7%) indicated that they use those EHRs (Table 12). One in ten PAs (10.1%) indicated that physicians can overwrite their documentation or attribute a PA s work as his or her own (Table 2 lists factors that limit PAs ability to most effectively use their EHR). One in ten PAs indicated that physicians can overwrite their documentation or attribute a PA s work as their own Modification of clinical documentation a concern Modification of a PA s clinical documentation is a significant compliance concern. A physician s ability to attribute a PA s work as his or her own is a potential misuse of EHR technology and increases the risk for fraud and abuse. Hospital and health systems using EHRs that can modify the work of a PA are also at risk of violating Medicare Conditions of Participation, which require assurance of the accuracy, authenticity, and integrity of the medical record. In addition to compliance concerns and potential penalties, the alteration of a PA s clinical documentation may compromise medical-legal documentation. Finally, EHRs that do not safeguard PA clinical documentation can lead to noncompliance and adversely affect patient care. 4 P age

Data Tables Table 1. EHR Access PA Has Full Access and Functionality N % Yes 576 91.6 No 53 8.4 Total 629 100.0 Question: "Do you have full access and functionality of the EHR system you use?" Table 2. EHR Effective Use Factors N % Restricted access and/or functionality 64 10.4 Requirement of unnecessary physician cosignatures 117 19.1 The ability of a physician to overwrite part of my documentation or attribute my work as his or her 62 10.1 own Results of diagnostic labs and tests I order not attributed to me and/or results not returned to me 121 19.7 Inability to measure my professional contribution to care 162 26.4 Inability to measure my productivity 185 30.1 Other 52 8.5 None of the above 261 42.5 Total 614 100.0 Question: "What are the factors that limit your ability to most effectively use your EHR? Select all that apply." Table 3. Target of EHR Limitations Who Limitations Affect N % Limitations apply to PAs only 38 10.9 Limitations apply to other health professionals 226 64.9 It depends 12 3.4 I don t know 72 20.7 Total 348 100.0 Question: "Do the limitations you have encountered only apply to PAs, or do they apply to other professionals (such as NPs)?" Table 4. Possibility of EHR Modifications to Remove Barriers for PAs EHR Modifications Possible N % Yes 157 45.8 No 186 54.2 Total 343 100.0 Question: "Have you spoken with your system administrator regarding whether it is possible to modify your employer s EHR system to remove the barriers for PAs?" 5 P age

Table 5. Who Can Carry Out System Changes Response N % Any changes could be carried out in house 27 17.5 Some or all would require changes from the EHR vendor 91 59.1 I don t know 36 23.4 Total 154 100.0 Question: "Could these system changes be carried out in-house, or would you be required to have such changes made by your EHR vendor?" Table 6. EHR Restrictions: Employer Policy or EHR System Constraints Response N % All restrictions are a result of employer policy 40 6.6 Most restrictions are a result of employer policy 73 12.0 All restrictions are a result of EHR functionality 71 11.7 Most restrictions are a result of EHR functionality 99 16.3 I don t know 325 53.5 Total 608 100.0 Question: "Are there any restrictions on your use of EHR systems that are a result of your employer s policy, as opposed to EHR system functionality constraints?" Table 7. PA Involvement in EHR Customization PA Was Involved in EHR Customization N % Yes 180 29.1 No 438 70.9 Total 618 100.0 Question: "Were you involved in or did you provide feedback on any customization of your employer s EHR system?" Table 8. EHR System Produced Reports About PA Services System Can Produce Reports About Services N % Yes 361 60.1 No 240 39.9 Total 601 100.0 Question: "Can your system produce reports regarding services you have provided (e.g. quality metrics, RVUs, revenue collected, etc.)?" Table 9. Reports Are Based Solely on Claims Submitted Under PA Name/NPI Response N % Reports based solely on claims data 147 43.6 Reports based on more comprehensive sources of information 190 56.4 Total 337 100.0 Question: "Are these reports based solely on claims submitted under your name/npi or is information more comprehensive (e.g. includes services rendered but not billed)?" 6 P age

Table 10. PA Training in the Use of EHR System PA Received Training N % Yes 532 86.1 No 86 13.9 Total 618 100.0 Question: "Have you received training in the use of the EHR systems you use?" Table 11. PA Formal Training in the Use of EHR System PA Received Formal Training N % Yes 422 80.8 No 100 19.2 Total 522 100.0 Question: "Was the training you received part of a formal training (provided during orientation or EHR implementation)?" Table 12. EHR Systems Used by PAs EHR System N % Allscripts 35 5.6 Athena Health 29 4.7 Cerner 60 9.6 CPSI (Evident) 1 0.2 eclinical Works 48 7.7 emds 4 0.6 Epic 205 32.9 GE Healthcare (Centricity) 13 2.1 Greenway Health (Vitera) 11 1.8 Kareo 1 0.2 NextGen 20 3.2 Other 171 27.4 None of the above 25 4.0 Total 623 100.0 Question: "What EHR system do you use?" Table 13. Satisfaction with EHR System Satisfaction N % Very satisfied 109 17.5 Somewhat satisfied 258 41.3 Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 89 14.3 Somewhat dissatisfied 92 14.7 Very dissatisfied 51 8.2 Not applicable 25 4.0 Total 624 100.0 Question: "Overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your EHR system?" 7 P age

Table 14. Satisfaction with EHR System Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied EHR System N % N % N % Allscripts 15 44.1 7 20.6 12 35.3 Athena Health 18 62.1 6 20.7 5 17.2 Cerner 36 60.0 7 11.7 17 28.3 CPSI (Evident) * * * * * 100.0 eclinical Works 25 52.1 10 20.8 13 27.1 emds * * * * * * Epic 163 79.5 24 11.7 18 8.8 GE Healthcare (Centricity) 7 53.8 * * 5 38.5 Greenway Health (Vitera) * * * * 6 54.5 Kareo * * * * * * NextGen 9 45.0 * * 9 45.0 Other (please specify): 85 51.2 29 17.5 52 31.3 None of the the above * 42.9 * 14.3 * 42.9 Total 367 61.3 89 14.9 143 23.9 Questions: "What EHR system do you use?" and "Overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your EHR system?" Satisfied = very or somewhat satisfied. Dissatisfied = very or somewhat dissatisfied. *Data cells with fewer than five respondents are left blank. 8 P age

Table 15. Electronic Exchange of Clinical Information Electronically exchanging clinical information with other providers outside my medical Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Not applicable organization... N % N % N % N % N % Improves my practice s quality of care 326 54.0 173 28.6 24 4.0 12 2.0 69 11.4 Increases my practice s efficiency 307 50.7 162 26.8 36 6.0 23 3.8 77 12.7 Prevents medication errors 240 40.3 207 34.7 52 8.7 22 3.7 75 12.6 Enhances care coordination 338 56.2 160 26.6 27 4.5 12 2.0 64 10.6 Reduces duplicate test ordering 265 44.0 186 30.9 52 8.6 27 4.5 72 12.0 Question: "Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements." Table 16. Barriers to Electronic Information Exchange Yes No I dont know Not applicable Barriers N % N % N % N % Providers in our referral network lack the capability to 280 46.6 168 28.0 112 18.6 41 6.8 electronically exchange We have limited or no IT staff 174 29.0 351 58.6 36 6.0 38 6.3 Electronic exchange involves incurring additional costs 91 15.4 134 22.7 330 55.9 35 5.9 Electronic exchange with providers using a different EHR 408 68.3 51 8.5 98 16.4 40 6.7 vendor is challenging The information that is electronically exchanged is not 67 11.2 376 63.0 82 13.7 72 12.1 useful It is difficult to locate the electronic address of providers 175 29.2 159 26.5 205 34.2 60 10.0 My practice may lose patients to other providers if we exchange information 13 2.2 359 59.8 158 26.3 70 11.7 Question: "Please indicate whether these issues are barriers to electronic information exchange with providers outside your medical organization." 9 P age

Table 17. Time Spent Documenting Clinical Care Outside Office Hours Time Spent N % None 133 21.7 Less than 1 hour 127 20.7 1 to 2 hours 192 31.3 More than 2 hours, up to 4 hours 111 18.1 More than 4 hours 50 8.2 Total 613 100.0 Question: "On average, how many hours per day do you spend outside of normal office hours documenting clinical care in your medical record system?" Table 18. Staff Support in Documenting Clinical Care PA Has Staff Support N % Yes 112 18.4 No 496 81.6 Total 608 100.0 Question: "Do you have staff support (e.g., scribe) to assist you with documenting clinical care in your medical record system?" Table 19. Time Spent Documenting Clinical Care Outside Office Hours Time Spent N % Very easy 130 21.2 Somewhat easy 312 51.0 Somewhat difficult 125 20.4 Very difficult 28 4.6 Not applicable 17 2.8 Total 612 100.0 Question: "How easy or difficult is it to document clinical care using your medical record system? 10 P age

Table 20. Perceptions About EHR System Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Not applicable Statement N % N % N % N % N % The amount of time I spend documenting clinical care is 87 14.4 224 37.1 171 28.3 99 16.4 23 3.8 appropriate. The amount of time I spend documenting clinical care does not reduce the time I spend 117 19.3 157 26.0 177 29.3 133 22.0 21 3.5 with patients. Additional documentation required solely for billing, but not clinical purposes increases the overall amount of time I 236 39.1 212 35.2 63 10.4 25 4.1 67 11.1 spend documenting clinical care. Clinical care documentation requirements for private insurers generally align with Medicare requirements. 83 13.9 306 51.1 54 9.0 9 1.5 147 24.0 Question: "Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statements about using your medical record system." 11 P age