M E M O R A N D U M. Board of Supervisors Transportation/Planning Committee

Similar documents
Legal Licensing and Compliance in the Commercial Cannabis Industry

CHEAC Summary BCC Cannabis Regulations. Distribution, Transportation, Retailers, and Laboratories

Ordinance Elements for Successful Implementation of Cannabis-Related Regulations in Merced, California

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, absent appropriate local regulation authorized by the MAUCRSA, state regulations will control; and

County of San Mateo. Inter-Departmental Correspondence. Department: COUNTY MANAGER File #: TMP-0716 Board Meeting Date: 7/11/2017

Proposition 64 Adult Use Marijuana Act (AUMA) with Information on Medical Cannabis

MANUFACTURING OPERATING STANDARDS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR COMMERCIAL CANNABIS OPERATIONS IN CITY OF CARSON

Public Workshop Supervisorial District 5 April 17, 2017 Larch Clover Community Center

Chapter Medical and Adult Use Cannabis Facilities

OC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT

Licensing & Regulating Cannabis Manufacturing

M E M O R A N D U M. Members of the Castro Valley Municipal Advisory Council

Public Workshop Industry Professional Outreach June 5, 2017 Robert J. Cabral Agricultural Center

Commercial Cannabis Business Licensing Program Regulations

FRAMEWORK FOR REGULATING CANNABIS IN THE UNINCOPORATED AREA OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY

SUBMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FROM : SUPERVISOR KEVIN JEFFRIES AND SUPERVISOR WASHINGTON :

This Chapter shall be known as the Marijuana Use and Regulation Ordinance for the City of Palm Desert.

AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF BANNING BANNING, CALIFORNIA

MAY 17, 2016 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION POLICY DISCUSSION ON MEDICAL CANNABIS CULTIVATION FACILITIES

3804: Medical and Retail Marijuana

DRAFT County Registration Form Medical Cannabis Cultivation and Future Non-Medical Cannabis Cultivation and Related Operations

Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act Hon. Steven K. Lubell (Ret.) Initial Summary, September 11, 2015

AMENDMENT 3 TO ORDER /19 FOR COUNCILOR BELINDA RAY RE: CHANGE TO ALLOWABLE SALES AT MARIJUANA RETAIL STORES.

Page 1 of 5. Kriss Worthington. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Councilmembers Kriss Worthington, Cheryl Davila, and Kate Harrison

ORDINANCE NO

EXHIBIT A. Sec Prohibition of Non-Medical Cannabis Commercial Activities

Please note that this draft is incomplete and likely to change before and/or after City Planning Commission review.

CHAPTER 11G. CANNABIS (MARIJUANA)

Marijuana Regulation Community Meeting. September 12, 2016

DRAFT Medical Marijuana Zoning Ordinance For City Planning Commission 10/17/17 October 11, [Additions underlined, deletions in strikeout.

Cannabis Labeling Requirements By State

SUBJECT Receive presentation on California Cannabis Legislation and Provide Direction on Proposed Actions for Redwood City

EXTENSION OF URGENCY INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF BUCKLEY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO

PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT FRAMEWORK FOR REGULATING CANNABIS IN THE UNINCOPORATED AREA OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY. November 14, 2017

Draft Cannabis Regulations City of San Luis Obispo

Cannabis Land Use Ordinance Draft Environmental Impact Report Public Briefing

ATTACHMENT E: SUMMARY OF LICENSE TYPES, STATE LAW, AND STATE REGULATIONS REGARDING CANNABIS

Cannabis Commercial Licensing Ad Hoc Recommendation, Future Pathway and Alternative Options 11/14/ A 1 of 42

(4) Be as detailed as necessary to provide history of work performed; and:

Proposed Amendments to the Cannabis Regulations: Edible Cannabis, Cannabis Extracts and Cannabis Topicals

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Recommendation

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, on October 9, 2015, Governor Jerry Brown signed the "Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act" ("Act") into law; and

FRAMEWORK FOR REGULATING CANNABIS IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY

North Central Florida Regional Planning Council

NAVIGATING INDUSTRIAL HEMP REGULATIONS IN COLORADO. Thuy Vu Thuy Vu Consulting, LLC 2018 Rocky Mountain Food Safety Conference May 9, 2018

SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA MATERIAL for Supplemental Packet 2

Butte County Board of Supervisors Agenda Transmittal

Medical Cannabis Uses

City of Santa Rosa Comprehensive Cannabis Ordinance & Program Implementation

ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

PC RESOLUTION NO XX

What are the major differences between MAUCRSA and the Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act ( MCRSA )?

CANNABIS. Working with local government and the cannabis industry to: Interactive Webinar Discussion on

CANNABIS RETAIL & PRODUCTION OPERATIONS PROPOSED REGULATIONS

Sausalito City Council October 30, 2018

MEDICAL MARIJUANA REGULATION AND SAFETY ACT 1 What Cities Need to Know About the New Law and Cultivation

Informational Briefing: Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act

City of Sebastopol. Meeting Date: To: From: Subiect: Recommendation: Funding:

78th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

Barbara Brohl Executive Director & State Licensing Authority Colorado Department of Revenue

Amend the Warren Zoning Bylaw by adding a new Section 15, Medical Marijuana Treatment Center, as follows:

BILL #261 CITY OF FERNLEY ORDINANCE #

BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ORDINANCE NO. 4512

New Article IX, of Chapter 22, Businesses, of the Sallisaw City Code is hereby established by enacting the following sections, to- wit:

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION AND ADDING

ORDINANCE NO. County Counsel Summary

ORDINANCE NO

WHEREAS, the Board desires to provide regulations pertaining to the location, land use, appearance, and signage of medical marijuana uses; and

Consumer Safety and Local Control

Community Meeting: Local Cannabis Policy in Oroville

Guidance for Municipalities Regarding Marijuana for Adult Use January 2018

STAFF REPORT City of Lancaster NB 2

(B) A testing laboratory shall analyze a sample of at least one half of one percent of the

ORDINANCE NO

COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO

ORDINANCE NO

Marijuana Enforcement Division Consumer Safety Presentation. Kyle Lambert Deputy Director Analysis & Planning Section

Marijuana Legalization: Issues and Questions for Municipalities Lincoln County Regional Planning Commission January 25, 2017

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EUREKA AMENDING TITLE 15 CHAPTER 158 MEDICAL CANNABIS: CULTIVATION, PROCESSING AND DISTRIBUTION

Cannabis Regulations for Sonoma County Jurisdictions as of March 26, 2018

Re: Items and Cannabis Legalization

ADD THE FOLLOWING TO THE END OF SECTION 8 SPECIAL PROVISIONS - AS A NEW SECTION 8.11

MEMORANDUM. DATE: November 19, Senator Kohl-Welles. Kathleen Buchli, Counsel medical marijuana proposal

ORDINANCE NO SECTION 1. The Board of Supervisors makes the following findings in support of this ordinance:

Medical Cannabis Ordinances. Tuesday, December 20, 2016

ORDINANCE (Next in Line)

CANNABIS DIALOGUE WORKSHOP NO. 4 MAY 11, 2017 WORKSHOP NO. 2 RECAP OF WORKSHOP #3 LESSONS LEARNED FROM CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA TOWN OF TRUCKEE

Proposed Adult Use Recreational and Medical Marijuana Bylaw Changes

Regulating Commercial Cannabis Activity within the City of Los Angeles: An Update on Cannabis Policy Development and Implementation

of an allowed industry law providing for the protection of the health, safety, morals and general

B.1 CANNABIS LAND USE ORDINANCE

City of Calistoga Staff Report

COUNTY ORDINANCE NO

STAFF REPORT Special Exception for a Medical Marijuana Dispensary in the Community Commercial Zoning District CASE NO

Sec MRSA c. 417 is enacted to read:

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIMI VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

PFC Industry Courses and Certifications

Transcription:

M E M O R A N D U M March 19, 2018 TO: FROM: Board of Supervisors Transportation/Planning Committee Cannabis Interdepartmental Work Group MEETING DATE: March 21, 2018 SUBJECT: Consideration of Issues regarding County Ordinances for Cannabis Manufacturers, Distributors, Testing Laboratories, and Microbusinesses BACKGROUND The Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA), which was signed by the Governor in June of 2017 and amended by AB 133 in September of 2017, consolidated the licensure and regulation of commercial medicinal and adult-use cannabis activities. On November 16, 2017, the three state agencies with licensing responsibility for cannabis activities -- the Department of Consumer Affairs (CDCA), the Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA), and the State Department of Public Health (CDPH) -- released revised regulations which were adopted through an emergency rulemaking process in order to take effect January 1, 2018. The Bureau of Cannabis Control (BCC), which is part of CDCA, is responsible for licensing retailers, distributors, testing laboratories, and microbusinesses; CalCannabis, which is part of CDFA, is responsible for licensing cultivators; and the Manufactured Cannabis Safety Branch (MCSB) of CDPH, is responsible for licensing manufacturers of cannabis products. State regulations require that, with the exception of testing labs, licensees must hold an A- license to engage in adult-use commercial cannabis activity and an M-license to engage in medicinal commercial cannabis activity. A business may hold both A- and M-licenses at the same premises; however, the cannabis moving through the supply chains in each of the two license categories must be tracked separately. DISCUSSION/SUMMARY Recently-adopted County ordinances address cannabis retail sales, delivery, and cultivation, but not manufacturing, distribution, testing laboratories, or microbusinesses. In order to allow these additional uses in the unincorporated area, amendments to the County Ordinance Code, similar to those for retail sales and cultivation, would need to be adopted. 1

Since these additional facility types raise many of the same concerns as cannabis retailers and cultivators, it would be appropriate for these new ordinances to include many of the same requirements, for example, security measures, mitigation of potential nuisances such as odors, and buffers from sensitive uses such as schools, parks, and daycare centers to reduce potential conflicts with existing land uses. In order to further minimize potential impacts on existing communities, the Board may also consider limiting the number of each type of facility allowed as the retail sales and cultivation ordinance do. Cannabis Manufacturing MAUCRSA defines Manufacturer as a licensee that conducts the production, preparation, propagation, or compounding of cannabis or cannabis products either directly or indirectly or by extraction methods, or independently by means of chemical synthesis, or by a combination of extraction and chemical synthesis at a fixed location that packages or repackages cannabis or cannabis products or labels or relabels its container. Four types of cannabis manufacturing licenses may be obtained from the State Department of Public Health: Type 7 for extraction using volatile solvents, such as butane, hexane, or pentane Type 6 for extraction using a mechanical method or a non-volatile solvent, such as food-grade butter, oil, water, ethanol, or carbon dioxide Type N for manufacturers that use infusion processes, such as using pre-extracted oils to create edibles, beverages, capsules, vape cartridges, tinctures, or topicals Type P for manufacturers that only package or repackage cannabis products or label or relabel the cannabis product container. For each license type, a licensee may also conduct all of the operations allowed under the license types below it. For example, under a Type 7 license, a manufacturer may conduct all operations allowed under Type 6, Type N, and Type P licenses. Currently, each licensee is required to have a separate premises. CDPH is in the process of developing an additional license type, Type S, which will allow businesses to share facility space on the same premises. CDPH anticipates that this license type will be ready to be issued in early 2018. State regulations require manufacturing licensees to have written procedures for inventory control, quality control, transportation, security, and cannabis waste disposal. The regulations are intended to ensure that production occurs in a sanitary and hazard-free environment, cannabis products are contaminant free, and THC levels are consistent throughout the product and within required limits. Extraction processes using carbon dioxide or a volatile solvent must be conducted using a closed-loop system, certified by a California-licensed engineer. Volatile solvent, carbon dioxide and ethanol extractions must also be certified by the local fire code official. The regulations contain extensive requirements for packaging and labelling; for example, edibles packaging must be opaque, tamperevident, child-resistant, and not attractive to children; labels must include an ingredient list, THC content, mandated warning statements, and a CDPH-issued universal symbol to indicate that the product contains cannabis. 2

Appropriate Zoning Districts Cannabis manufacturing facilities are similar to other types of manufacturing facilities that are allowed in the M-P (Industrial Park) District, M-1 (Light Industrial) and M-2 (Heavy Industrial) Zoning Districts. The industrial area within the unincorporated county is located at the western end of Grant Avenue in San Lorenzo. Because the area is relatively small, consisting of approximately 117 acres, and includes few vacant properties, potential sites for cannabis manufacturing facilities in this area would be limited. The Environmental Health Department and the Fire Department will be consulted in the development of the cannabis manufacturing ordinance to ensure health and safety issues concerning both the products made at the facilities and the areas surrounding the facilities are adequately addressed. Extraction Using Volatile Solvents Because of the potential danger of explosion and fire associated with oil extraction methods that use volatile solvents, some jurisdictions have elected to not allow operations that use these substances. Other jurisdictions limit these uses to heavy industrial zoning districts to ensure that these facilities are located away from concentrations of people and incompatible land uses. The City of Hayward does not allow extraction using volatile solvents, while the City of San Leandro allows all forms of manufacturing with a conditional use permit. The Counties of Monterey and Mendocino allow the use of volatile solvents in specified industrial zoning districts. Sonoma County does not allow volatile solvents. Cannabis Distributors MAUCRSA requires that all transportation of cannabis and cannabis products between licensed facilities be conducted by a licensed distributor or their direct employees. Distributors are also responsible for arranging for laboratory testing and quality assurance for cannabis and cannabis products, checking for appropriate packaging and labelling, and collecting taxes. All cannabis and cannabis products must pass through a distributor prior to being sold to customers by a retailer. State regulations require that cannabis goods be transported in a locked container inside a commercial vehicle that is equipped with an alarm. The regulations also require that a manifest containing specified information accompany each shipment. Distributors require a location for the storage of cannabis and cannabis products awaiting transport to another licensee, and while testing is being performed. The distributor s premises would be similar to other warehouse-type uses that are currently allowed in the M-1 (Light Industrial) and M-2 (Heavy Industrial) zoning districts. A potential increase in truck traffic, adequate security measures, and mitigation of nuisances such as odor should be considered in developing an ordinance for distributors. 3

Cannabis Testing Laboratories MAUCRSA defines testing laboratory as a laboratory, facility, or entity in the state that offers or performs tests of cannabis or cannabis products and that is both of the following: (1) Accredited by an accrediting body that is independent from all other persons involved in commercial cannabis activity in the state. (2) Licensed by the bureau. After a distributor takes possession of a cannabis goods batch, state regulations require that the distributor contact a licensed testing laboratory and arrange for a laboratory employee to come to the distributor s licensed premises to select a representative sample for laboratory testing. The regulations include requirements pertaining to minimum sample size, transportation of the samples to the laboratory site, storage of samples, and documentation of all sampling activity. Tests must be performed to identify and measure a long list of potential contaminants, including heavy metals, microbial impurities, residual pesticides, and residual solvents. Edible cannabis products that contain more than one serving per unit must be tested for consistent levels of THC and CBD. After testing, the laboratory must generate a certificate of analysis that contains the results of the testing and whether the tested batch passed or failed. Laboratories are currently allowed in the M-P (Industrial Park) District, the M-2 (Heavy Industrial) District, and the C-O (Commercial Office) District. Since only small amounts of cannabis would be transported to the testing laboratory and stored on-site, testing laboratories are likely to have fewer impacts on the surrounding area than other types of operations. Providing adequate security would still be a consideration. Microbusinesses MAUCRSA requires that microbusiness licensees engage in at least three of the following commercial cannabis activities: cultivation (less than 10,000 square feet), manufacturing (with the exception of extraction using volatile solvents), distribution, or retail sales. Licensees may only engage in the commercial cannabis activities listed on the microbusiness license, and are required to comply with all of the state statutes and regulations for each of the cannabis activities included in their operation. County ordinances could accommodate microbusinesses by allowing combined cannabis uses on a single property as long as the property is in a location that is appropriate for each of the uses and all other ordinance requirements for each cannabis use are met. The differing characters of the communities 4

and current limitations on land uses allowed in the various zoning districts would make implementation of the microbusiness model challenging in the unincorporated area. NEXT STEPS Based on direction from your Committee, staff will report on options for the consideration of new ordinances for cannabis manufacturing operations, distributors, testing labs, and microbusinesses at your next Committee meeting. 5