ARIC Manuscript Proposal #2426. PC Reviewed: 9/9/14 Status: A Priority: 2 SC Reviewed: Status: Priority:

Similar documents
ARIC Manuscript Proposal #2493. PC Reviewed: 2/10/15 Status: A Priority: 2 SC Reviewed: Status: Priority:

ARIC Manuscript Proposal #1233. PC Reviewed: 4_/_10/07 Status: _A Priority: 2_ SC Reviewed: Status: Priority:

ARIC Manuscript Proposal # 1518

ARIC Manuscript Proposal #992. PC Reviewed: 01/20/04 Status: A Priority: 2 SC Reviewed: 01/20/04 Status: A Priority: 2

ARIC Manuscript Proposal # PC Reviewed: 05/12/09 Status: A Priority: 2 SC Reviewed: Status: Priority:

ARIC Manuscript Proposal # PC Reviewed: 2/10/09 Status: A Priority: 2 SC Reviewed: Status: Priority:

ARIC Manuscript Proposal #1491. PC Reviewed: 03/17/09 Status: A Priority: 2 SC Reviewed: Status: Priority:

Statins in the elderly : Is there a rationale?

A Mendelian Randomized Controlled Trial of Long Term Reduction in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Beginning Early in Life

Statins in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.

ARIC Manuscript Proposal #2099. PC Reviewed: 3/12/13 Status: A Priority: 2 SC Reviewed: Status: Priority:

ARIC Manuscript Proposal # PC Reviewed: _12/20/05 Status: Priority: SC Reviewed: Status: Priority:

STATINS FOR PAD Long - term prognosis

CLINICAL OUTCOME Vs SURROGATE MARKER

Think Again About Cholesterol Survey

An example of a systematic review and meta-analysis

Title: Statins for haemodialysis patients with diabetes? Long-term follow-up endorses the original conclusions of the 4D study.

APPENDIX B: LIST OF THE SELECTED SECONDARY STUDIES

How would you manage Ms. Gold

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

Supplementary figures

Andrew Cohen, MD and Neil S. Skolnik, MD INTRODUCTION

Supplementary Appendix

Supplemental Data. Genome-wide Association of Copy-Number Variation. Reveals an Association between Short Stature

Is Lower Better for LDL or is there a Sweet Spot

Statins and New Onset Diabetes Mellitus NPO

Supplementary appendix

ARIC Manuscript Proposal # 1266r. PC Reviewed: _12/11_/07 Status: A Priority: _2 SC Reviewed: Status: Priority:

The All Wales Medicine Strategy Group (AWMSG) is asked to support implementation of the following prescribing indicators.

Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes-the CORALL study Simsek, S.; Schalkwijk, C. G.; Wolffenbutel, B.H.

Nicole Ciffone, MS, ANP-C, AACC Clinical Lipid Specialist

ESC Geoffrey Rose Lecture on Population Sciences Cholesterol and risk: past, present and future

STATIN THERAPY IN THE ELDERLY: THERE ARE MILES TO GO BEFORE WE SLEEP

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

rosuvastatin, 5mg, 10mg, 20mg, film-coated tablets (Crestor ) SMC No. (725/11) AstraZeneca UK Ltd.

Downloaded from:

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment. Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Calculating RR, ARR, NNT

Comparison of Original and Generic Atorvastatin for the Treatment of Moderate Dyslipidemic Patients

During the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp [1], a priming dose of human insulin (Novolin,

Macrovascular Residual Risk. What risk remains after LDL-C management and intensive therapy?

Robyn Cruz, PharmD, BCPS, BCPP 1

Supplementary Online Content

Review of guidelines for management of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients

Atherosclerotic Disease Risk Score

Analyzing Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors and Proper Clinical Prescription of Statins. Peter Thorne

Cholesterol Management Roy Gandolfi, MD

4/7/ The stats on heart disease. + Deaths & Age-Adjusted Death Rates for

ARIC Manuscript Proposal # PC Reviewed: 5/13/08 Status: A Priority: 2 SC Reviewed: Status: Priority:

Modern Lipid Management:

Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo

Joslin Diabetes Center Advances in Diabetes and Thyroid Disease 2013 Consensus and Controversy in Diabetic Dyslipidemia

Primary prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases: Differences between European and United States Guidelines

LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular outcomes?

ATP IV: Predicting Guideline Updates

ARIC Manuscript Proposal # 979. PC Reviewed: 11/21/03 Status: Rejected Priority: SC Reviewed: Status: Priority:

JAMA. 2011;305(24): Nora A. Kalagi, MSc

HDL-C. J Jpn Coll Angiol, 2008, 48: NIPPON DATA80, MEGA study, JELIS, dyslipidemia, risk assessment chart

B. Patient has not reached the percentage reduction goal with statin therapy

Statins in the elderly: What evidence of their benefit in prevention?

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

Regence. Medical Policy Manual. Date of Origin: September 29, 2011

Supplementary Online Content

An update on lipidology and cardiovascular risk management. Lipids, Metabolism & Vascular Risk Section - Royal Society of Medicine

Regence. Medical Policy Manual. Date of Origin: May Topic: Genetic Testing for Lipoprotein(a) Variant(s) as a Decision Aid for Aspirin Treatment

Drug Class Review on HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors (Statins)

Scientific conclusions

York, New York, USA. Received 22 March 2010 Revised 5 October 2010 Accepted 17 November 2010

Introduction. Objective. Critical Questions Addressed

A loss-of-function variant in CETP and risk of CVD in Chinese adults

Imaging-Guided Statin Allocation: Seeing Is Believing

Should we prescribe aspirin and statins to all subjects over 65? (Or even all over 55?) Terje R.Pedersen Oslo University Hospital Oslo, Norway

Landmark Clinical Trials.

Dyslipidemia in the light of Current Guidelines - Do we change our Practice?

HCHS/SOL Submission Instructions for Manuscripts or Publications

Statin Treatment for Older Adults: The Impact of the 2013 ACC/AHA Cholesterol Guidelines

1. Which one of the following patients does not need to be screened for hyperlipidemia:

The Pharmacists Role in Lipid Management

Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (Review)

ARIC Manuscript Proposal # PC Reviewed: _11/_21_/06 Status: A Priority: _2 SC Reviewed: _12/_07_/06 Status: A Priority: _2

Assessing Cardiovascular Risk to Optimally Stratify Low- and Moderate- Risk Patients. Copyright. Not for Sale or Commercial Distribution

Early Clinical Development #1 REGN727: anti-pcsk9

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 6 October 2010

Reassessing the Benefits of Statins in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetic Patients A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Inflammation and and Heart Heart Disease in Women Inflammation and Heart Disease

The Framingham Coronary Heart Disease Risk Score

The recently released American College of Cardiology

Request for Applications Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder GWAS

CVD Risk Assessment. Lipid Management in Women: Lessons Learned. Conflict of Interest Disclosure

9/3/ AHA/ACC Lipid Guidelines on the Treatment of Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerosis. Disclosure

ARIC Manuscript Proposal # 1618

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

Cholesterol lowering intervention for cardiovascular prevention in high risk patients with or without LDL cholesterol elevation

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

Supplementary Online Content

Prevention of Heart Disease: The New Guidelines

2013 ACC AHA LIPID GUIDELINE JAY S. FONTE, MD

Disclosures. Prevention of Heart Disease: The New Guidelines. Summary of Talk. Four guidelines. No relevant disclosures.

Considerable uncertainty remains in the evidence for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Populations Interventions Comparators Outcomes Individuals: With diagnosed heart disease. rehabilitation

Transcription:

ARIC Manuscript Proposal #2426 PC Reviewed: 9/9/14 Status: A Priority: 2 SC Reviewed: Status: Priority: 1a. Full Title: Statin drug-gene interactions and MI b. Abbreviated Title: CHARGE statin-gene GWAS of CHD 2. Writing Group: Christy L. Avery, Eric A. Whitsel, Til Stürmer, Eric Boerwinkle, Jay Stewart (and attempting to maintain symmetry across contributing cohorts), other members of the CHARGE Drug-Gene GWAS Consortium, as well as other interested members of the ARIC CHD working groups I, the first author, confirm that all the coauthors have given their approval for this manuscript proposal. CA Christy L. Avery University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of Epidemiology Cardiovascular Disease Program Bank of America Center, Suite 306-E 137 East Franklin Street Chapel Hill, NC 27514 (T) 919-966-4312 (F) 919-966-9800 christy_avery@unc.edu Corresponding/senior author (if different from first author correspondence will be sent to both the first author & the corresponding author): Eric A. Whitsel University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of Epidemiology Cardiovascular Disease Program Bank of America Center, Suite 306-E 137 East Franklin Street Chapel Hill, NC 27514 (T) 919-966-3168 (F) 919-966-9800 eric_whitsel@unc.edu 3. Timeline: Statistical analyses: November 2014 February, 2015 Manuscript preparation: March, 2015 April, 2015 Manuscript revision: May, 2015 July, 2015 Manuscript submission: August, 2014

4. Rationale: In the United States, coronary heart disease (CHD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, accounting for approximately 425,000 deaths 1 and 1,958,000 years lost to disability or early mortality annually. 2 The 3-hydroxymethyl-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, also known as statins, are widely prescribed and are highly effective in the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease, including CHD. 3, 4 Statin therapy results in lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels by up to 55%, which usually translates into a 20-30% reduction of cardiovascular events. 5 Despite the clinical efficacy of statins in a wide range of populations, inter-individual variability exists with regard to LDL-C lowering response as well as efficacy in reducing major cardiovascular events. 6 We previously reported two novel genome-wide significant loci associated with LDL-C response in the CHARGE consortium (Postmus et al., in press). The goal of the proposed analysis is to build upon our previous effort to systematically examine within a common working group whether common genetic variants modify the association between statin use and incident CHD. This manuscript proposal is part of a larger effort examining gene-drug associations in the CHARGE consortium. Briefly, CHARGE was formed to facilitate GWAS meta-analyses and replication opportunities among multiple large population-based prospective cohort studies, including the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility (AGES) -- Reykjavik Study, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC), the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), the Framingham Heart Study (FHS), Rotterdam Study (RS), HealthABC (HABC), and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). We also have established collaborations with several randomized clinical trials (RCTs), including the Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly (PROSPER), Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT), Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS), Treating to New Targets (TNT), and Justification for Use of Statins in Primary Prevention (JUPITER). 5. Main Hypotheses/Study Questions: Using an incident case-only design (definite or probable MI or definite fatal CHD), to examine the association between statin use (1,0) and SNP dosage. The case-only design was chosen to facilitate harmonization between the RCTs and observational studies, as a formal interaction analysis was not possible for the former. 6. Design and Analysis: The approach is first to conduct within-study analyses of the association between phenotype and genotype for each of the 2.5 imputed autosomal SNPs and then to combine the findings from the within-study analyses by the method of inverse-variance meta-analysis. We will only examine incident MI or fatal CHD events that occur within three years of ARIC study visits 1-4, reflecting the lack of medication inventory outside ARIC study visits. Outcome. Statin use among incident cases of definite or probable MI or definite fatal CHD. Statin use is assessed by medication inventory at each visit. For this analysis, we will assign statin exposure using the medication inventory preceding the event. Events occurring >3 years after the

preceding medication inventory will be excluded. Exposure. SNP_doseage Model. We propose a case-only logistic model as shown below: Statin use ~ SNP_dose + age + sex +... where "+..." denotes additional study specific covariates (e.g. ancestry PCs). Genome-Wide Significance Level. 5x10-8 7.a. Will the data be used for non-cvd analysis in this manuscript? Yes _x_ No b. If Yes, is the author aware that the file ICTDER04 must be used to exclude persons with a value RES_OTH = CVD Research for non-dna analysis, and for DNA analysis RES_DNA = CVD Research would be used? Yes No (This file ICTDER04 has been distributed to ARIC PIs, and contains the responses to consent updates related to stored sample use for research.) 8.a. Will the DNA data be used in this manuscript? _x_ Yes No 8.b. If yes, is the author aware that either DNA data distributed by the Coordinating Center must be used, or the file ICTDER04 must be used to exclude those with value RES_DNA = No use/storage DNA? _x_ Yes No 9. The lead author of this manuscript proposal has reviewed the list of existing ARIC Study manuscript proposals and has found no overlap between this proposal and previously approved manuscript proposals either published or still in active status. ARIC Investigators have access to the publications lists under the Study Members Area of the web site at: http://www.cscc.unc.edu/aric/search.php _x_ Yes No 10. What are the most related manuscript proposals in ARIC (authors are encouraged to contact lead authors of these proposals for comments on the new proposal or collaboration)? Manuscript proposal #1406 (Genome-wide Association Study of Coronary Heart Disease in White Adults of European ancestry: the CHARGE Consortium, Boerwinkle). Dr. Boerwinkle is a coauthor on this manuscript proposal. 11. a. Is this manuscript proposal associated with any ARIC ancillary studies or use any ancillary study data? _x_ Yes No 11.b. If yes, is the proposal _x_ A. primarily the result of an ancillary study (AS #2009.10) B. primarily based on ARIC data with ancillary data playing a minor role (usually control variables; list number(s)* ) *ancillary studies are listed by number at http://www.cscc.unc.edu/aric/forms/ The following acknowledgment will appear in the published manuscript

The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study is carried out as a collaborative study supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute contracts N01-HC-55015, N01-HC-55016, N01-HC-55018, N01-HC-55019, N01-HC-55020, N01-HC-55021, N01-HC-55022, R01HL087641, R01HL59367 and R01HL086694; National Human Genome Research Institute contract U01HG004402; and National Institutes of Health contract HHSN268200625226C. The authors thank the staff and participants of the ARIC study for their important contributions. Infrastructure was partly supported by Grant Number UL1RR025005, a component of the National Institutes of Health and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. Support for genotyping ARIC participants to facilitate interaction studies was provided by NHGRI through the GENEVA study. 12. Manuscript preparation is expected to be completed in one to three years. If a manuscript is not submitted for ARIC review at the end of the 3-years from the date of the approval, the manuscript proposal will expire.

REFERENCES 1. Keenan NL, Shaw KM, Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Coronary heart disease and stroke deaths - united states, 2006. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries. 2011;60 Suppl:62-66 2. McKenna MT, Michaud CM, Murray CJ, Marks JS. Assessing the burden of disease in the united states using disability-adjusted life years. American journal of preventive medicine. 2005;28:415-423 3. Taylor F, Huffman MD, Macedo AF, Moore TH, Burke M, Davey Smith G, Ward K, Ebrahim S. Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2013;1:CD004816 4. Prospective Studies C, Lewington S, Whitlock G, Clarke R, Sherliker P, Emberson J, Halsey J, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Blood cholesterol and vascular mortality by age, sex, and blood pressure: A meta-analysis of individual data from 61 prospective studies with 55,000 vascular deaths. Lancet. 2007;370:1829-1839 5. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists C, Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, Holland LE, Reith C, Bhala N, Peto R, Barnes EH, Keech A, Simes J, Collins R. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of ldl cholesterol: A meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376:1670-1681 6. Mangravite LM, Thorn CF, Krauss RM. Clinical implications of pharmacogenomics of statin treatment. The pharmacogenomics journal. 2006;6:360-374