UNIVAC decision support model A universal framework for evaluating vaccine policy options in low- and middle-income countries

Similar documents
Overview of the ProVac Initiative

Papillomavirus Rapid Interface for Modelling and Economics Tool. User Manual

Vaccine 31S (2013) C19 C29. Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect. Vaccine. jou rn al hom ep age: e/vaccine

Taking vaccine effectiveness into public health decision making: The ProVac Example

Critical immunity thresholds for measles elimination

Strengthening evidence-based decision making for new vaccine introduction: PAHO s ProVac Initiative

IMPACT OF HPV IMMUNIZATION STRATEGIES & POTENTIAL FOR CERVICAL CANCER ELIMINATION

Burden of Paediatric Rotavirus Gastroenteritis & Potential Impact of Rotavirus Vaccination

Cost-effectiveness of Influenza Vaccine

Using a mathematical model to evaluate the impact of different PCV schedules:

Crucial factors that influence cost-effectiveness of universal hepatitis B immunization in India Prakash C

Economic Evaluation. Introduction to Economic Evaluation

Measles Strategic Planning Tool: Analysis of MCV strategies in developing countries. Emily Simons 29 January 2009

3. Title Vaccination and immunisation data return collected through the COVER

Mark Jit 1,2 1. Improving health worldwide. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine 2. Modelling and Economics Unit, Public Health England

Using A Transmission Dynamic Model Of Rotavirus Infection To Determine The Cost- Effectiveness Of Rotavirus Vaccination In Bangladesh

Summary of WHO Position on Rotavirus. Narendra K. Arora SAGE Member Executive Director The INCLEN Trust International New Delhi (India)

Health technology Four strategies for the control of serogroup C meningococcal disease (CMD) were examined. These were:

Rift Valley fever in Kenyan pastoral livestock: Individual-based demographic model to analyse the impact of Rift Valley fever

Vaccine 26S (2008) F3 F15. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Vaccine. journal homepage:

Introduction to the ProVac Initiative

e-bug: Vaccinations Teacher Sheet Student worksheet 1 answers

USING MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR POLICY AND STRATEGIC PLANNING A case study of VMMC Scale-Up in Eastern and Southern Africa

Cost-Effectiveness of Quadrivalent vs Monovalent Vaccination against Meningococcal Disease in Canada

Gender (in)equality in Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccinations and treatment Prof. Giampiero Favato

Reporting and Interpreting Results of Economic Evaluation

Economic evaluation of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccination in Slovenia Pokorn M, Kopac S, Neubauer D, Cizman M

Challenges of use of cholera vaccines in Haiti and the Americas

Modeling the public health impact of malaria vaccines for developers and policymakers

Data inputs for HIV models and how they inform HIV prevention interventions Dobromir Dimitrov

The cost-effectiveness of vaccination against Lyme disease Shadick N A, Liang M H, Phillips C B, Fossel K, Kuntz K M

Sustaining Immunization in Developing Countries: The Future We Make

Impact and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in 73 Gavi countries

GSK Medicine: Rotarix (HRV): GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals live attenuated human rotavirus vaccine Study No.: (EPI-ROTA ) Title:

Modelling screening of HPV vaccinated birth cohorts. The infection transmission system

Potential Impact on HIV Incidence of Increasing Viral Suppression among HIV-positive MSM in Baltimore: Mathematical Modelling for HPTN 078

Putting it together: The potential role of modeling to explore the impact of FMD

Infectious Disease Surveillance in NZ. Michael Baker Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington

Economic Evaluation. Defining the Scope of a Costeffectiveness

Stakeholder Dissemination Meeting: Total Systems Effectiveness (TSE) Pilot Project in Thailand

Reflections on the use of future HIV vaccines as part of an integrated package of preventive measures

Pertussis in adolescents and adults: should we vaccinate Lee G M, LeBaron C, Murphy T V, Lett S, Schauer S, Lieu T A

Report to the Board. Typhoid vaccines: WHO Position paper. Weekly epidemiological record. 2008; 6: ibid

Tuberculosis Tutorials

Setting The setting was community. The economic study was carried out in the USA.

Value of post-licensure data to assess public health value Example of rotavirus vaccines

Modelling BCG vaccination in the UK: What is the impact of changing vaccination policy?

The English immunization programme

Modelling HIV prevention: strengths and limitations of different modelling approaches

WHO Rotavirus Vaccine Update Dr. Fatima Serhan WHO/FWC/IVB/EPI

Setting The setting was primary care. The economic study was carried out in Norway.

Modelling Innovative Diagnostic Tools for Tuberculosis

Malaria Vaccine Implementation Programme Framework for Policy Decision

Cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination in high-risk children in Argentina Dayan G H, Nguyen V H, Debbag R, Gomez R, Wood S C

Malaria Vaccine Implementation Programme (MVIP) update and framework for policy decision. Mary J Hamel, WHO MPAC, 11 April 2018

Hepatitis B Disease Burden: A Model for Global Estimates and Impact of Vaccination. Susan A. Wang, MD, MPH Division of Viral Hepatitis

Appendix. Lifetime extrapolation of data from the randomised controlled DiGEM trial

Downloaded from:

EConDA Economics of Chronic Diseases

Gavi Alliance Strategy : Goal level indicators and disease dashboard

Why is surveillance important after introducing vaccines?

GSK Medicine: Study No.: Title: Rationale: Objectives: Indication: Study Investigators/ Centres: Research Methods: Data Source Study Design

Gavi s Vaccine Investment Strategy

Modelling HIV Transmission and Treatment for US MSM to Estimate the Impact of HPTN 078 on HIV Incidence

5 $3 billion per disease

Sun-Young Kim 1,2, Steven Sweet 1, Joshua Chang 1 and Sue J Goldie 1,2* Abstract

Economic evaluations of non-traditional vaccinations in middle-income countries Suwantika, Auliya Abdurrohim

Report to the Board 6-7 June 2018

Assessment of cost-effectiveness of universal hepatitis B immunization in a low-income country with intermediate endemicity using a Markov model

Healthy People 2020 objectives were released in 2010, with a 10-year horizon to achieve the goals by 2020.

Summary of Definitions of Mission and Strategic Goal Level Indicators. in GAVI Alliance Strategy Updated October 2013

Cost effectiveness analysis of the new pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Synflorix TM ) compared to Prevnar

What are the outputs? What is generated by whom? Decade of Vaccine Economics (DOVE) 18/07/2014

Budget Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Including a Pentavalent Rotavirus Vaccine in the New Zealand Childhood Immunization Schedulevhe_

A. Green, C. Sortsø, P.B. Jensen, M. Emneus

Decision-making by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices

Evaluating Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Strategies in Canada using the Cancer Risk Management HPV Microsimulation Model (CRM-HPVMM)

JTEG s Summary of RTS,S/ AS01 Clinical Trial Data

Economic Evaluation of a Universal Childhood Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccination Strategy in Ireland

Immunization Safety Office: Overview and Considerations on Safety of Alternative Immunization Schedules

Health technology The screening of newborns for galactosemia (GAL) using the Beutler test was studied.

THE AFIX PRODUCT TRAINING MANUAL

Decision Analysis. John M. Inadomi. Decision trees. Background. Key points Decision analysis is used to compare competing

Experience with maternal pertussis and PCV13 immunisation in England

Global reductions in measles mortality and the risk of measles resurgence

6IATT Toolkit, Expanding and Simplifying Treatment for Pregnant Women Living with HIV: Managing the Transition to Option B/B+

Cost-effectiveness of a vaccine to prevent herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in older adults Hornberger J, Robertus K

Schedules and strategies for HPV immunization Conclusions and proposed recommendations for SAGE

Cost-effectiveness of antiviral drug therapy to reduce mother-to-child HIV transmission in sub-saharan Africa Marseille E, Kahn J G, Saba J

Rotarix : Global Efficacy against Severe RV GE due to G1 and non-g1 (G2, G3, G4, G9) RV Types

Economic aspects of viral hepatitis in Turkey. Levent AKIN VIRAL HEPATITIS PREVENTION BOARD MEETING ISTANBUL, TURKEY, NOVEMBER 12-13, 2009

Cost effectiveness of pertussis vaccination in adults Lee G M, Murphy T V, Lett S, Cortese M M, Kretsinger K, Schauer S, Lieu T A

Gisele Almeida Public Policies, Regulation, and Health Financing Health Systems and Services

Concepts of herd immunity and protection

Does your family planning program need a Reality Check? Leah Jarvis, MPH Program Associate for Monitoring, Evaluation, and Research

Modelling of Infectious Diseases for Prevention and Mitigation: How Modelling has Informed Public Health Policy

Male Circumcision: Decision Makers Program Planning Tool

Assessing the Evidence for Potential Benefits and Risks of Removing the Age Restrictions for Rotavirus Vaccination

Transcription:

UNIVAC decision support model A universal framework for evaluating vaccine policy options in low- and middle-income countries Andrew Clark, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Key questions 1. How do you access, navigate and run UNIVAC? 2. How are the UNIVAC inputs used to generate outputs?

Key questions 1. How do you access, navigate and run UNIVAC? 2. How are the UNIVAC inputs used to generate outputs?

Key questions 1. How do you access, navigate and run UNIVAC? 2. How are the UNIVAC inputs used to generate outputs?

Main output (outcome measure) 1. Cost-utility ratio Cost per DALY averted

Outputs of UNIVAC 1. Cost-utility ratio Cost per DALY averted 2. Vaccine costs Incremental vaccine costs 3. Healthcare costs Healthcare costs averted 4. Disease events Cases, visits, hosps., deaths, DALYs 5. Adverse events Cases, visits, hosps., deaths, DALYs 6. Benefit-risk ratio e.g. Deaths averted per death caused

Without vaccination, how many disease events can we expect over the lifetime of a birth cohort? Start by using United Nations Population Division (UNPOP) projections of the number of individuals that will be alive in each single year of age (and single calendar year) as the birth cohort ages

BIRTH COHORTS CALENDAR YEARS 2030 2029 2028 2027 2013 2013 8

BIRTH COHORTS Population, no vaccine CALENDAR YEARS 2030 2029 2028 2027 2013 2013 1000 950 920 910 900 895 890 885 880 875 870 865 860 855 850 845 840 835 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 etc... Years of age 9

Without vaccination, how many disease events can we expect over the lifetime of a birth cohort? Start by using United Nations Population Division (UNPOP) projections of the number of individuals that will be alive in each single year of age (and single calendar year) as the birth cohort ages Multiply by age-specific rates of disease per 100,000 per year to estimate numbers of disease events

BIRTH COHORTS Deaths, no vaccine CALENDAR YEARS 2030 2029 2028 2027 2013 2013 50 40 20 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 etc... Years of age 11

BIRTH COHORTS Deaths, no vaccine CALENDAR YEARS 2030 2029 2028 2027 2013 2013 50 40 20 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 Years of age For simplicity, this example focuses on disease in under-fives 12

BIRTH COHORTS Deaths, no vaccine CALENDAR YEARS 2030 2029 2028 2027 2013 2013 50 40 20 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 Years of age 13

Without vaccination, how many disease events can we expect over the lifetime of a birth cohort? Start by using United Nations Population Division (UNPOP) projections of the number of individuals that will be alive in each single year of age (and single calendar year) as the birth cohort ages Multiply by age-specific rates of disease per 100,000 per year to estimate numbers of disease events If you want to account for changes in inputs over time (e.g. demography, mortality rates, coverage, price) then repeat for up to 30 birth cohorts

BIRTH COHORTS Deaths, no vaccine CALENDAR YEARS 2030 2029 2028 2027 2013 2013 50 40 20 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 Years of age 15

BIRTH COHORTS Deaths, no vaccine CALENDAR YEARS 2030 2029 2028 2027 2013 2013 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 16

BIRTH COHORTS Deaths, no vaccine CALENDAR YEARS 2030 2029 2028 2027 2013 2013 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 17

BIRTH COHORTS Deaths, no vaccine CALENDAR YEARS 2030 2029 2028 2027 2013 2013 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 18

BIRTH COHORTS Deaths, no vaccine CALENDAR YEARS 2030 2029 2028 2027 2013 2013 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 19

BIRTH COHORTS Deaths, no vaccine CALENDAR YEARS 2030 2029 2028 2027 2013 2013 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 20

BIRTH COHORTS Deaths, no vaccine CALENDAR YEARS 2030 2029 2028 2027 2013 2013 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 Also useful if you want to report results by calendar year 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 21

Without vaccination, how many disease events can we expect over the lifetime of a birth cohort? Start by using United Nations Population Division (UNPOP) projections of the number of individuals that will be alive in each single year of age (and single calendar year) as the birth cohort ages Multiply by age-specific rates of disease per 100,000 per year to estimate numbers of disease events If you want to account for changes in inputs over time (e.g. demography, mortality rates, coverage, price) then repeat for up to 30 birth cohorts Repeat for each disease type and outcome

Disease type 1 Cases Visits Hosps. Deaths

Cases Visits Hosps. Deaths Disease type 1 Disease type 2

Cases Visits Hosps. Deaths Disease type 1 Disease type 2 Disease type 3 up to 10 types

Example: Rotavirus configuration 1 Cases Visits Hosps. Deaths Any RVGE

Example: Rotavirus configuration 2 Cases Visits Hosps. Deaths Any RVGE

Example: Rotavirus configuration 3 Cases Visits Hosps. Deaths Any GE

Example: Rotavirus configuration 4 Cases Visits Hosps. Deaths Non-severe RVGE Severe RVGE

Example: Rotavirus configuration 5 Cases Visits Hosps. Deaths Non-severe RVGE Severe RVGE Intussusception The background rate of severe adverse events can also be included if required. Users can then enter the relative risk of vaccination compared to this background rate to estimate vaccine-related events.

With vaccination, how many disease events can we expect over the lifetime of a birth cohort? Start by specifying the period of vaccination

BIRTH COHORTS Deaths, no vaccine CALENDAR YEARS 2030 2029 2028 2027 2013 2013 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 Vaccinate infants born - 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 32

With vaccination, how many disease events can we expect over the lifetime of a birth cohort? Start by specifying the period of vaccination Multiply age-specific disease events by: 1 [ (% covered by only 1 dose x efficacy of dose 1) + (% covered by only 2 doses x efficacy of dose 2) + (% covered by only 3 doses x efficacy of dose 3).etc. ]

With vaccination, how many disease events can we expect over the lifetime of a birth cohort? Start by specifying the period of vaccination Multiply age-specific disease events by: 1 [ (% covered by only 1 dose x efficacy of dose 1) + (% covered by only 2 doses x efficacy of dose 2) + (% covered by only 3 doses x efficacy of dose 3).etc. ] This calculation is applied by year of age 5-99 years and by week of age <5 years. UNIVAC therefore asks for additional inputs <5yrs: Age distribution of disease by week of age <5yrs; Vaccine coverage/timeliness by week of age <5yrs; Vaccine efficacy by time in weeks since dose given.

BIRTH COHORTS Deaths, no vaccine CALENDAR YEARS 2030 2029 2028 2027 2013 2013 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 Vaccinate infants born - 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 35

BIRTH COHORTS Deaths, routine vaccine CALENDAR YEARS 2030 2029 2028 2027 2013 2013 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 5 4 2 1 1 5 4 2 1 1 5 4 2 1 1 5 4 2 1 1 Vaccinate infants born - 5 4 2 1 1 5 4 2 1 1 5 4 2 1 1 5 4 2 1 1 5 4 2 1 1 5 4 2 1 1 36

BIRTH COHORTS Deaths, routine vaccine CALENDAR YEARS 2030 2029 2028 2027 2013 2013 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 50 40 20 10 5 5 4 2 1 1 5 4 2 1 1 5 4 2 1 1 5 4 2 1 1 Vaccinate infants born - and track future benefits 5 4 2 1 1 5 4 2 1 1 5 4 2 1 1 5 4 2 1 1 5 4 2 1 1 5 4 2 1 1 37

COMPARATOR 50760 deaths without vaccine NEW OPTION 590 deaths with vaccine e.g. ~50000 future deaths prevented if all children born - are tracked over their lifetimes

UNIVAC advantages and drawbacks Advantages Accessibility developed in Excel so familiar to most users; Transparency can be easily explained to national teams and decision makers; Simplicity uses a minimal set of inputs and steps; Flexibility can be quickly adapted to evaluate new options in a timely way; Comparability allows for more standardised comparisons between vaccine policy options; Drawback Static unlike dynamic models, UNIVAC does NOT track the number of susceptible, infectious and immune individuals over time, so cannot directly simulate herd (and other indirect) effects. However, in mitigation (!), calibration of dynamic models: can be a lengthy/complex process; may not provide estimates defensible by MoH if based on poor quality data; may not be necessary if plausible whatif scenarios can demonstrate that inclusion of indirect effects would not change the recommendation/decision.

If you want to know more about The PAHO/WHO Provac Initiative http://www.paho.org/provac/index.php?lang=en The Provac Toolkit http://www.provac-toolkit.com/ Partners