Small Group Sample Report (8 People) Thursday, February 26, Group Report. This report is provided by:

Similar documents
Respondent Name Thursday, February 26, Individual Report. This report is provided by:

Behavioral Intelligence

Predictive Index Factor Emphasis Combinations

DiSC PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT

Factor Insights. Predictive Index, LLC

COMPARISON REPORT. Working with Alex Bradley. Thursday, April 07, This report is provided by:

COMPARISON REPORT. For Gracie Lee Working with Alex Bradley. Friday, January 19, This report is provided by:

Lauren Nichols Style: Networker. Personality I.D. Individual Report. Individual Report. Tuesday, November 27, :04:05 PM

THE 5-MINUTE PERSONALITY TEST L O G B

EVERYTHING DiSC COMPARISON REPORT

in Challenging Times

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE ABILITY TO IDENTIFY AND MANAGE ONE S OWN AND OTHERS EMOTIONS. Report for Lucas Sample ID UH Date April 02, 2013

For Alex Bradley Working with Gracie Lee. Thursday, April 14, This report is provided by:

For Alex Bradley Working with Gracie Lee. Wednesday, May 30, This report is provided by:

Developing Yourself to Your Highest Potential

What is Your Behavioral Style?

CONCEPTS GUIDE. Improving Personal Effectiveness With Versatility

Stepping Up to Leadership. Teresa Boyce CAMSS Education Forum June 2, 2017

GAINING INSIGHT INTO YOURSELF. Insight... understanding yourself and others. INSIGHT Inventory

TRACOM Sneak Peek Excerpts from. Self-Perception Guide

S T Y L E I N V E N T O R Y. Instructions

Project: Date: Presented by: Siegel HR

Individual Report Debrief Template

BIRKMAN REPORT THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR: JOHN Q. PUBLIC (D00112) ANDREW DEMO (G526VC) DATE PRINTED February

Developing Highly Effective People

Improving Personal Effectiveness With Versatility

Customer Service Action Planner

SAMPLE. Coaching Report for. Sally Sample. This Sample Report provided by:

The Key to Great Leadership

Behavioral EQ MULTI-RATER PROFILE. Prepared for: By: Session: 22 Jul Madeline Bertrand. Sample Organization

draft Big Five 03/13/ HFM

KNOWLEDGE THINK. Intro. Lab Coach ASK: What have you done to discover your spiritual gifts? What successes and failures have you encountered?

Facet Descriptions A/Z. Golden Personality Type Profiler. John P. Golden, Ed.D TalentLens.com

Comparison Report For Kathryn Petersen Working with Martin Gilmore

Different Personalities, Different Needs

Your DISC Personality Report

Platinum Rule Assessment Do unto others as they d like done unto them.

SCHOOLPLACE. Trait Report BIG FIVE PROFILE. A Customized Report for: Sample Person. Date: 06/20/2017. Pierce J. Howard, PhD Jane Mitchell Howard, MBA

REPORT PREPARED FOR: Roger Plate REPORT DATE: November 05, 2009

Appreciating Different Styles

Insight Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI)

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE TEST-R

Couple: Ann S & John S PID Style: Strategic Thinker vs Cautious Thinker

Positive couple agreement happens when both you and your partner answer in a healthy direction.

The. DISCstyles Behavioral Report

Secrets to Leading with Assertiveness. Participant Manual

Distributed by: Chart Your Course International Inc DISC - The Universal Language of Observable Behavior 1

EVERYTHING DiSC COMPARISON REPORT

PRODUCTIVE CONFLICT PROFILE

COMPARISON REPORT. For Alex Bradley Working with Gracie Lanza A S S E S S M E N T T O A C T I O N. Tuesday, June 26, This report is provided by:

KCC - DISC - Personality Profile Report. John Sample

Leadership Traits and Ethics

CAN T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG?

Myers-Briggs: Understanding Personality Type and Communication

A Powerful Way to Understand People An introduction of the DISC concept By Robert A. Rohm, Ph.D. Everyone is not like you!

Communication Styles. Jeff Thomas Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Understanding the True Realities of Influencing. What do you need to do in order to be Influential?

Development. summary. Sam Sample. Emotional Intelligence Profile. Wednesday 5 April 2017 General Working Population (sample size 1634) Sam Sample

Personality I.D. Comparison Report. Bill R & Chuck F PID Style: Harmonizer & Cautious Thinker. Alet Strydom

Improving Managerial Effectiveness With Versatility

Communicating with Style

Version The trait emotional intelligence (trait EI) model successfully integrates and extends EIrelated

Contents. Chapter. A Closer Look at You. Section 17.1 Your Personality Section 17.2 Develop a Positive Attitude. Chapter 17 A Closer Look at You

CREATIVE EMPATHETIC PLANFUL. Presented in Partnership With

JUNIOR SEMINAR 3: MYERS-BRIGGS TYPE INDICATOR MARC TUCKER

Emotional-Social Intelligence Index

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Discovering Your Primary Motivational Gift

BEHAVIORAL DIFFERENCES TIP SHEET Karlene Belyea, MBA

ON STRESS AND ANXIETY IN PROJECTS. Claudia Brandt, next level consulting SA

RESEARCH REPORT. EVERYTHING DiSC APPLICATION LIBRARY. Everything DiSC Application Library Research Report

Personality Perspectives. Do You Really Know Who You Are Supervising?

THE INTEGRITY PROFILING SYSTEM

YSC Potential Guide Report for Joe Bloggs

TTI SUCCESS INSIGHTS Team Building Version

SUBSCALE DEFINITION LOW SCORE HIGH SCORE. Good Attachment Good relationships with others Hostile toward authority Positive attitude toward authority

MANAGING FOR SUCCESS. Gabrielle Highstein. Employee-Manager Version. Instructor in Medicine Washington U Schl of Medicine

Favorite world: Do you prefer to focus on the outer world or on your own inner world? This is called Extraversion (E) or Introversion (I).

Reference Pattern Observations

Discovering Diversity Profile Individual Report

TRADE SECRET INFORMATION

Respect Handout. You receive respect when you show others respect regardless of how they treat you.

ENHANCED. Multi-Rater U N I V E R S A L. Profile SOCIAL STYLE. Prepared for: Jane Style Highlands Ranch, CO. By: TRACOM Group.

For Banks. Results Report. For: Sample Bank. Name: Sample, Jane Date Completed: 09/26/14 Position Applied For:: Supervisor Location: Main

Course Purpose The purpose of this course is to learn tips for effectively working with people with different and challenging behaviors.

2. What's My MBTI Personality Type?

The Big Idea of Small Groups. Alexa S. Chilcutt, Ph.D. University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry

ACME Chemical

Behavior Preferences and Implications for the Workplace Patricia G. Wilkins

MANAGING FOR SUCCESS. Sales Version. John Doe 1/4/99. "He who knows others is learned. He who knows himself is wise." Lao Tse

Elimination of Implicit Bias By Adapting to Various Personalities

Ministry. to the. Newly Married

MIPS Revised Millon Index of Personality Styles Revised Interpretive Report Theodore Millon, PhD, DSc

Sample Report. Sample Report Report. Fa c i l i tat or s (05/13) 180

CPI 260. Report prepared for JOHN SAMPLE

Transcription:

Group Report mall Group ample Report (8 People) Thursday, February 26, 2004 This report is provided by: TRANNG OLUTON, nc. www.trainingsolutions.com 703-318-0838

The Report mall Group ample Report ndra offers an in-depth understanding of relationship dynamics by applying the time-honored model to interpersonal style. Using the feedback provided by ndra, individuals and groups are able to reduce conflict and increase their comfort and effectiveness when relating with others. This report explores the relationship dynamics of this group based on the nterpersonal tyles of its members. ndra Model ndra displays a person s nterpersonal tyle on two dimensionsontrol-adapt and Affiliate- etach. Each of the 16 distinct styles represents a specific combination of these dimensions. There are no right or wrong styles in the ndra approach to understanding relationships in the workplace. ndra simply provides a map for understanding each other s view of how we handle the relationship dynamics of ontrol and Affiliation. Pioneering ompetitive emanding c onvincing ontrol Expressive ociable heerful s Resolute etach Affiliate Receptive Matter-of-fact erious s Private Adapt areful Modest ooperative Patient 2003 by nscape Publishing, nc. All rights reserved. mall Group ample Report 2

Your Map mall Group ample Report Pioneering ompetitive 2 onvincing 4 Expressive ociable emanding c 3 5 heerful s 1 Resolute 6 Receptive Matter-of-fact 8 7 ooperative erious s Private areful Modest Patient The Group version of the ndra Map contains the Vectors for everyone in your group. Each person s Vector represents their exact preferences along the ontrol and Affiliation dimensions, determining their nterpersonal tyle. The members of your group and their nterpersonal tyles are listed on the next page. 2003 by nscape Publishing, nc. All rights reserved. mall Group ample Report 3

nterpersonal tyles of Your Group Each group member, along with their nterpersonal tyle, is listed in the table according to their Vector location, starting with the c pattern and moving clockwise around the ndra Map. A symbol is assigned to each group member on the basis of their tyle. On the following four pages, each of the ndra nterpersonal tyles are described, along with the number of people and percentage of the group with each tyle. An integrated summary of your group is then presented in the section on Group ynamics, followed by the Group nterpersonal ontinuum for exploring similarities and differences, and the Relationship Fit Matrix for all the dyads in your group. Finally, a set of questions and an action plan are provided for further exploration with your group. Vector Group Member nterpersonal tyle ymbol 1 ompetitive 1.1 ompetitive () 2 Paul Pioneering Pioneering () 3 Patty Pioneering Pioneering () 4 athy onvincing onvincing () 5 Erik Expressive Expressive () 6 Receptive 7.3 Receptive () 7 Mark Modest Modest () 8 helly erious erious () 2003 by nscape Publishing, nc. All rights reserved. mall Group ample Report 4

The nterpersonal tyles emanding (c) Number of People: 0 (0%) c s People with a emanding (c) style tend to be intense and forceful in their approach to life. Often strong-willed and independent, they are likely to prefer pursuing their own path and directing their own activities rather than collaborating with others. Tending to have a serious approach to life, they are likely to expect a certain amount of struggle in order to achieve their goals. As a result, they are unlikely to spend much time in casual social interactions with others. trongly focused on results, people with this style tend to want control over those things that affect their ability to achieve their goals. s ompetitive () Number of People: 1 (12.5%) c s People with a ompetitive () style tend to be strongly individualistic and determined. They tend to prefer dealing with people in a straightforward manner and appreciate others engaging them candidly as well. Often selfreliant and resourceful, people with this style may be comfortable with aggressive interactions. They are likely to seek competitive situations and their desire to win may be stronger than their sensitivity to the needs of others. Their firm approach tends to communicate to others that they should take their complaints elsewhere if they want a softhearted response. s Pioneering () Number of People: 2 (25%) c s People with a Pioneering () style tend to be eager to take charge and set the pace. onvincing others to work toward their goals, they are usually seen as decisive, forceful, and persuasive. t seems easy for them to take the lead in conversations, even in the face of opposition from others. People tend to see them as assertive and resistant to influence from others. Tending to be quick in thought and action, people with this style may be impatient and fault-finding with those who are not. s onvincing () Number of People: 1 (12.5%) c s People with a onvincing () style tend to seek to influence people and situations. They may make a conscious effort to modify the thoughts and actions of others using persuasive verbal abilities. Their ability to express views confidently and their skill at remaining composed under pressure is likely to demonstrate their leadership abilities to others in a compelling way. People with this style may find teaching or directing others effective as a way of displaying power and self-confidence in an affiliative rather than competitive way. Others are likely to enjoy their dynamic approach. s 2003 by nscape Publishing, nc. All rights reserved. mall Group ample Report 5

The nterpersonal tyles Expressive () Number of People: 1 (12.5%) c s People with an Expressive () style tend to approach people and situations in an energetic, lively manner. They seem to enjoy the challenge of meeting new people and getting them to like them. They tend to communicate clearly and vividly, using an emotionally expressive and demonstrative style. With this inspiring approach, they are likely to sway people to their point of view. They seem to be quite good at attracting people and keeping them as colleagues, clients, or friends. People with this style are true extroverts and are likely to find themselves easily wrapped up in their interpersonal environment. s ociable () Number of People: 0 (0%) c s s People with a ociable () style tend to be cheerful and outgoing. With their optimism and great enthusiasm for life, they are unlikely to be discouraged by negative responses from others. They are likely to have a relaxed, casual manner when interacting with others. Open and easy to approach, they tend to be actively involved with other people. They may look for ways to include interaction with others as part of their daily activities, seeking a job and activities that provide maximum opportunities. Valuing approval and popularity, people with this style are likely to cultivate a wide range of friends and acquaintances cutting across work and social circles. heerful (s) Number of People: 0 (0%) c s People with a heerful (s) style tend to be warm and light-hearted. Positive and joyful in their approach to life, they are likely to find a great deal to appreciate in others. No matter what someone might say or do, they probably find something complimentary to say about that person. As a result, they tend to give others the feeling of being understood and accepted for who they are. People with this style seem to have discovered that acceptance and approval can be won by using friendly behavior. They are likely to feel most comfortable interacting with others in an open and optimistic manner, expressing their thoughts and feelings freely. s Receptive () Number of People: 1 (12.5%) c s People with a Receptive () style tend to be easygoing and friendly. They are likely to present a relaxed, approachable manner to others. Feeling at ease with things as they are, they tend to respond to others in a trusting, receptive manner. They tend to establish positive relations with others with their agreeable, affiliative responses. Their trusting behavior is likely to draw similar responses from others. Other people are likely to find people with this style easy to talk to because of their comfortable interpersonal style. s 2003 by nscape Publishing, nc. All rights reserved. mall Group ample Report 6

The nterpersonal tyles ooperative () Number of People: 0 (0%) c s People with a ooperative () style tend to be even-tempered and accepting. Empathetic and supportive, they are likely to show caring and understanding when listening to others. Their considerate responses are likely to create a warm atmosphere that encourages other people to express their feelings without any fear of embarrassment or rejection. People with this style are probably eager to understand others problems. Offering understanding and support, they seem to be skillful at finding and acknowledging another person s good qualities. s Patient () Number of People: 0 (0%) c s People with a Patient () style tend to be calm and respectful in their interactions with others. Not quickly angered or excited, they are likely to work to maintain harmony. They tend to demonstrate their conscientiousness by listening patiently to the needs and requests of others. They are also likely to be comfortable showing their appreciation for guidance from a strong leader. n fact, people with this style may feel more comfortable taking direction from someone who has clear vision and strong decision-making ability than in using their own judgment. s Modest () Number of People: 1 (12.5%) c s People with a Modest () style tend to be low-key and easygoing. They are likely to offer predictability and consistency in their interactions and may want the same from others. They tend to be comfortable letting others direct conversations and may hesitate to state their preferences, not wanting to be seen as demanding. They may be quick to agree with others viewpoints rather than risking conflict with them. The unassuming demeanor of people with this style makes them easy to approach. They are likely to adjust easily to a wide range of personal styles and seek to bring increased harmony to any situation. s areful () Number of People: 0 (0%) c s s People with a areful () style tend to be cautious and soft-spoken in their interactions. They are likely to be self-controlled and careful in their approach, seeking to conform to the expectations of those in authority. omewhat restrained in their interactions with others, they may avoid situations that involve challenging, competing, or exercising power over others. While they may be uncomfortable in authority roles, other people are likely to find their unthreatening style easy to approach. As they are probably willing to follow the direction of others, people with this style may find conventional, predictable interactions provide them with the sense of comfort and security they seek. 2003 by nscape Publishing, nc. All rights reserved. mall Group ample Report 7

The nterpersonal tyles Private (s) Number of People: 0 (0%) c s People with a Private (s) style tend to be reserved and solitary. They may prefer to limit their social contact to interactions that are more structured than informal. Tending to be serious and rational, they may enjoy logical arguments or interacting with people who use a more systematic, methodical approach. They are likely to think carefully before speaking and use words precisely. Tending to be somewhat introverted, people with this style may hesitate to join in casual conversation with others. nce they seem to be comfortable with their reserved, solitary approach to life, interactions with others may take a low priority in their day-to-day activities. s erious () Number of People: 1 (12.5%) c s s People with a erious () style tend to be distant and unexpressive in their interactions. They may seek to limit social interactions to those that are necessary to fulfill work requirements. Tending to be somewhat introverted, they are likely to value their privacy and may prefer to pursue solitary activities. eeming to approach life in a somber manner, they may also be critical and perfectionistic. Perhaps as a result of their exacting standards, people with this style may look at life skeptically, or even pessimistically. Their skepticism may give them a realistic appraisal of situations, as they are unlikely to be influenced by someone else s perceptions or ideas. Matter-of-fact () Number of People: 0 (0%) c s s People with a Matter-of-fact () style tend to be reserved in their expression. Tending to relate to others in a detached manner, they are likely to build trust slowly when interacting with new people. They may take time to get to know someone before revealing much about themselves. Rather than seeking close involvement with a specific group of people, they may find that having the right amount of personal space, privacy, and autonomy is most important to their sense of wellbeing. As they are likely to be controlled in their emotional expression, they may appear detached and unconcerned. People with this style may use their reserved, unsentimental approach as a way of maintaining a comfortable distance. Resolute () Number of People: 0 (0%) c s s People with a Resolute () style tend to have a firm determination and fixed purpose in life. Although they tend to be reserved, their determined approach enables them to be firm when necessary. They are likely to pursue their goals vigorously, even in the face of opposition. n fact, they may anticipate difficulties and attempt to control negative outcomes through vigilant adherence to rules and standards. With their goal-oriented, purposeful approach to life, they may not always seem as concerned about others. They are not likely to waste time and energy on social pleasantries while striving for results. Others probably view people with this style as being stern but fair, acknowledging their purposeful approach to life. 2003 by nscape Publishing, nc. All rights reserved. mall Group ample Report 8

Group nterpersonal ynamics A group s interactions will be characterized by how the Vectors of the group members fall on the ontrol-adapt and Affiliate-etach dimensions. A group may have people equally distributed in all four quadrants formed by the two dimensions or the group may have greater representation in one quadrant than another. You will see the composition of your group displayed in the graphic below. emanding c Pioneering ompetitive 4 people 50% onvincing ontrol Expressive 1 person 12.5% ociable heerful s Resolute etach Affiliate Receptive Matter-of-fact erious 1 person 12.5% s Private Adapt areful 2 people 25% Modest ooperative Patient Training Group - Group ynamics The interpersonal styles of your group members are more represented in the ontrol hemisphere than the Adapt hemisphere. The interpersonal styles of your group members are more represented in the etach hemisphere than the Affiliate hemisphere. You have more members of your group in the ontrol/etach quadrant than the other three quadrants. Based on the unique combination of Vector locations for each member of your group, it is likely that your group interacts in a direct, results-oriented, and purposeful manner. This interpersonal approach may represent the type of work in which the group is involved or it may simply represent the interpersonal styles of the people in the group. f your work environment has the same balance of requirements, you may have a good fit. Your group can also explore strategies for meeting the needs of different work environments using the Group alogue questions at the end of this report. 2003 by nscape Publishing, nc. All rights reserved. mall Group ample Report 9

nterpersonal ontinuum - Group The nterpersonal ontinuum maps each nterpersonal tyle in your group based on 50 interpersonal behaviors. This continuum can be used to increase understanding of the similarities and differences between you and the other people in your group. uggested dialogue questions for exploring differences and similarities can be found in the alogue section of this report. To understand the continuum, find your symbol listed on page 4. This symbol is the same for everyone with your nterpersonal tyle. Locate your symbol in the continuum, either highlighting or circling it for easy identification. The number under each symbol represents the number of people in the group with that particular style. Low High accepting To go along with; tolerate without protest 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 accommodating Obliging, easy to deal with 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 adventurous nclined to undertake new and daring enterprises 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 approachable Easy to talk to or deal with 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 argumentative Given to arguing; quarrelsome 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 assertive nclined to bold or confident assertion; emphatic 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 blunt Lacking in feeling, insensitive 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 calm omposed, relaxed 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 careful Attentive to potential danger or harm; prudent 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 cheerful Being in good spirits; merry 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 competitive Having a strong urge to win 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 conforming Behaving in a conventional way 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 cooperative Willing to work with others 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 demanding Requiring much of others 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 direct traightforward and to the point 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 distant ool in manner; aloof, reserved 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2003 by nscape Publishing, nc. All rights reserved. mall Group ample Report 10

nterpersonal ontinuum - Group To understand the continuum, find your symbol listed on page 4. This symbol is the same for everyone with your nterpersonal tyle. Locate your symbol in the continuum, either highlighting or circling it for easy identification. Low dominant Exercising the most influence 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 easy-going Relaxed in attitude; unworried 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 expressive howing feeling; emotional 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 firm howing determination or resolution; unyielding High 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 flexible Responsive to change 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 hesitant Acting with uncertainty; discreet 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 impersonal howing no emotion; aloof 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 industrious ligent in work or study 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 inspiring timulating to action; motivating 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 joyful Feeling, expressing, or causing extreme gladness 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 lenient nclined not to be harsh or strict 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 matter-of-fact traightforward or unemotional 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 modest Not wanting to call attention to oneself; retiring 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 open Receptive to others; sociable 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 optimistic Expecting a favorable outcome 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 outgoing ociable and responsive to others 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 outspoken peaking freely, openly, or boldly 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 patient apable of calmly awaiting an outcome or result 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 persuasive Having power to convince others 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2003 by nscape Publishing, nc. All rights reserved. mall Group ample Report 11

nterpersonal ontinuum - Group To understand the continuum, find your symbol listed on page 4. This symbol is the same for everyone with your nterpersonal tyle. Locate your symbol in the continuum, either highlighting or circling it for easy identification. Low private Valuing freedom from intrusion or public attention 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 questioning Given to doubt; skeptical 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 quiet Reserved; soft-spoken; mild; meek 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 receptive Ready or willing to receive favorably 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 reserved howing self-restraint in expression 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 resolute Firm or determined; unwavering 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 restrained Moderate in response; well-behaved, orderly 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 serious Grave in quality or manner; stern 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 skeptical Given to doubt; questioning 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 sociable Fond of the company of others; gregarious 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 stern Firm or unyielding; uncompromising 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 tactful onsiderate in dealing with others 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 undemanding Not requiring much of others 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 verbal Talkative, expressive 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 warm hows enthusiasm and friendliness 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 High 2003 by nscape Publishing, nc. All rights reserved. mall Group ample Report 12

Relationship Fit Matrix The Relationship Fit Matrix summarizes all possible dyadic relationships for all members of your group. We are likely to find our most effective and comfortable relationships are with those people with whom we have a relationship fit on both dimensions of ontrol and Affiliation. Relationships can fit on both dimensions, one of the two dimensions, or none. We refer to these as: Fit on 2 fit on both ontrol and Affiliation dimensions Fit on 1 fit on either ontrol or Affiliation dimensions Fit on 0 fit on neither ontrol nor Affiliation dimensions f a relationship with a particular person has a fit on one or less dimensions, it does not mean you cannot or will not have a relationship that is effective or comfortable. t means that the relationship is likely to require more effort than a relationship that has a fit on both dimensions. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1. ompetitive 1.1 ----- 2. Paul Pioneering ----- 3. Patty Pioneering ----- 4. athy onvincing ----- 5. Erik Expressive ----- 6. Receptive 7.3 ----- 7. Mark Modest ----- 8. helly erious ----- Fit on 2 dimensions Fit on 2 or 1 dimension(s) Fit on 1 dimension Fit on 1 or 0 dimension(s) Fit on 2, 1 or 0 dimension(s) Fit on 0 dimensions A tip for reading this table is to find your number across the header and then read down the column corresponding to your number. A legend is also provided to help you understand the table. To learn more about a specific relationship of interest, a yad Report is available separately. 2003 by nscape Publishing, nc. All rights reserved. mall Group ample Report 13

Group alogue Questions Each group can benefit from dialogue about how they manage similarities and differences in their day-today interactions. Here are some suggested questions for your group dialogue. 1. n what ways does the mix of interpersonal styles of group members work well in your environment? 2. What challenges does the mix of interpersonal styles of group members create in your environment? 3. n what ways can group members flex their styles when there are either increased or decreased requirements for ontrol/affiliate behaviors? 4. n what ways can group members flex their styles when there are either increased or decreased requirements for ontrol/etach behaviors? 5. n what ways can group members flex their styles to meet either increased or decreased requirements for Adapt/Affiliate? 6. n what ways can your group members flex their styles to meet either increased or decreased requirements for Adapt/etach? 7. Looking at the nterpersonal Behavior ontinuum, where do you see opportunities for optimizing your effectiveness? 8. Looking at the nterpersonal Behavior ontinuum, where do you see challenges for optimizing your effectiveness? 9. What specific actions can you implement to improve the functioning of your group? 2003 by nscape Publishing, nc. All rights reserved. mall Group ample Report 14

Action Plan /We will improve our effectiveness as a work group with the following actions: We will do more of: We will do less of: We will continue doing: 2003 by nscape Publishing, nc. All rights reserved. mall Group ample Report 15