RELINE-trial : 24 months results with the Viabahn vs PTA for in-stent restenosis

Similar documents
Does stent design influence the results of SFA stenting?

PES BTK 70 : 12 m results with a paclitaxelcoated self-expanding stent in BTK arteries

Combination therapy : treatment rationale and clinical evidence

DCB + stent in the SFA

Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment

Surgical Bypass or. Zilver PTX. 12 months preliminary data. LINC 2016, Leipzig. Marc Bosiers, MD. Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

12-Month and preliminary 24-month outcomes of combining a DCB with a modern generation of nitinol stent in fem-pop lesions. BIOLUX 4EVER study

BIOLUX 4EVER : Combining Passeo-18 Lux DCB and Pulsar-18 BMS : 12 month results of full cohort

Or is the ivolution stent a better alternative? EVOLUTION 12-month data

Treating in-stent occlusions with the Rotarex catheter : The ROBINSON study

Surgical Bypass vs. Zilver PTX stent for long SFA lesions : Interim results of the ZilverPass Trial

Preliminary 6-month results of VMI-CFA trial

DCB level 1 evidence review

The ZILVERPASS study a randomized study comparing ZILVER PTX stenting with Bypass in femoropopliteal lesions

Koen Keirse, MD RZ Tienen, Belgium

SFA In-stent Restenosis

Update in femoral angioplasty & stenting PRO

Treatment Strategies for Long Lesions of greater than 20 cm

Clinical Data Update for Drug Coated Balloons (DCB) Seung-Whan Lee, MD, PhD

Merits and demerits of DES, DEB or covered stent in lower extremity arterial occlusive disease 성균관의과대학삼성서울병원순환기내과최승혁

Disclosures. In the DCB Era, How Do I Choose To Use a Stent? When to Stent and What Devices to Use in the SFA

Christian Wissgott MD, PhD Assistant Director, Radiology Westküstenkliniken Heide

Clinical benefits on DES Patient s perspectives

Which Stent Is Best for Various Femoropopliteal Anatomy? 2018 Pacific Northwest Endovascular Conference June 15-26, 2018 Seattle, WA

The ZILVERPASS study a randomized study comparing ZILVER PTX stenting with Bypass in femoropopliteal lesions Preliminary report

Current Status and Limitations in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis

TOBA Trial 12 months Results

4/14/2016. Faculty Disclosure. Drug-eluting technology in the SFA and Popliteal. Typical SFA Disease Pattern. Why Peripheral Artery Disease Matters

Promise and limitations of DCB in long lesions What Have we Learned from Clinical Trials? Ramon L. Varcoe, MBBS, MS, FRACS, PhD

One Year after In.Pact Deep: Lessons learned from a failed trial. Prof. Dr. Thomas Zeller

Extreme SFA Lesions: DETOUR I 12- Month Results in Lesions >30cm. Sean Lyden, MD Chairman Vascular Surgery Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Ohio

Making BTK Interventions more Durable: Are DES and DCB the answer? Thomas Zeller, MD

REACT Treatment Rationale and Clinical Evidence. ICI Meeting 5th of December 2017

Drug-coated balloons in BTK:

The importance of scientific evidence. Prof. I. Baumgartner Head Clinical & Interventional Angiology University Hospital Bern

How to perform CFA Supera deployment. Koen Deloose, MD Head Dept Vascular Surgery AZ Sint Blasius Dendermonde, Belgium

MEET M. Bosiers K. Deloose P. Peeters. SFA stenting in 2009 : The good and the ugly What factors influence patency?

Lessons learnt from DES in the SFA is there any ideal concept so far?

Disclosures. Rational Selection of Endovascular Options for the SFA and Popliteal: What Works Where and for How Long?

The Crack and Pave technique for highly resistant calcified lesions. Manuela Matschuck MD University Hospital Leipzig Department Angiology

Future Algorithm for Lower Extremity Revascularization: Where Does Vessel Prep Fit?

Nicolas W Shammas, MD, MS

DCB in my practice: How the evidence influences my strategy. Yang-Jin Park

Outcomes Of DCB Use In Real World Registries: 2 Year Results From The INPACT Global Registry

Preliminary 12 Months results of the RAPID trial

Future of stenting in the. Koen Deloose, MD Head Dept Vascular Surgery AZ Sint Blasius Dendermonde, Belgium

Atherectomy is Still Live and Effective. John R. Laird, MD Professor of Medicine Medical Director of the Vascular Center UC Davis Health System

Update on the role of drug eluting balloons

Could a combination of DCB + stent be the answer in complex SFA lesions

Are Drug-coated balloons Durable? Level 1 evidence review. Koen Keirse, MD Vascular Surgery, RZ Tienen Tienen, Belgium

Update on the Levant 2 Clinical Trial Programme. Dierk Scheinert, MD University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig, Germany

What Happened in the IN.PACT Deep Trial. Zaheed Tai, DO,FACC,FSCAI Bos4ck Heart Center Winter Haven, FL

In-Stent Restenosis: New Evidence From Laser + Drug Coated Balloons

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Insights from the IN.PACT Global Full Clinical Cohort

New Evidence from Laser + Drug Coated Balloons for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis

Do we really need a stent in long SFA lesions? No: DEB is the answer

Is combination therapy with directional atherectomy followed by DCB the answer to challenges in treating SFA disease?

DCB + BMS is not a DES

ASK THE EXPERTS. 0% 7. Bare-Metal Stent

a physician-initiated study investigating the RoadSaver stent in carotid lesions Dr. Michel Bosiers

Drug- Coated Balloons for the SFA: Overview of Technology and Results

The clinical outcome camparison between covered stent(cv) and drug-eluting balloon(deb) for SFA lesions: a single center result

The latest generation DEB

Michael K.W. Lichtenberg, MD

Importance of Thorough Vessel Preparation Followed By Anti- Restenotic Therapy: An Update from the DEFINITIVE AR Study

Cutting/scoring balloon Cryoplasty Drug-eluting balloon Brachytherapy Debulking Restent (BMS or DES) John R. Laird, MD

Maximizing Outcomes in a complex population with Drug-coated balloon

Clinically proven. ordering info. Vascular Intervention // Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System/0.018 /OTW. Pulsar-18

Evolving Role of Drug-Eluting Stents In Complex SFA - Majestic Trial Data

Fabrizio Fanelli, MD, EBIR Director Vascular and Interventional Radiology Department "Careggi " University Hospital Florence - Italy

Management of In-stent Restenosis after Lower Extremity Endovascular Procedures

Contemporary use of DCBs, Ranger clinical trial and investigator sponsored research

The latest evidences from the DES trials in peripheral arterial disease

BIOLUX P-III Passeo-18 Lux All-comers Registry: 12-month Results for the All-Comers Cohort

Minimizing Burden, the effect of thin strut and low Chronic Outward Force SE stents

Are DES and DEB worth the cost in BTK interventions?

2-YEAR DATA SUPERA POPLITEAL REAL WORLD

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Drug eluting stents and balloons in peripheral arterial disease A.T.O. ABDOOL-CARRIM UNIVERSITY OF WITWATERSRAND

Vessel Preparation: What does it mean and what are the current tools? Lawrence Garcia, MD St. Elizabeth s Medical Center Boston, MA, USA

Comparison Of Primary Long Stenting Versus Primary Short Stenting For Long Femoropopliteal Artery Disease (PARADE)

Methods Study Design. Patient Population. Study Device. Stent Procedure and Follow-up. 312 Journal of Endovascular Therapy 24(3)

Biology of in-stent restenosis and rational for debulking

Real PTX RCT: 3 year data from a randomized comparison of DCB vs. DES in femoropopliteal lesions

Efficacy of DEB in Calcification and Subintimal Angioplasty

Is a Stent or Scaffold Necessary in The SFA?

Angiographic dissection pattern and patency outcomes of post balloon angioplasty for SFA lesions -a retrospective multi center analysis-

The BATTLE Trial Comparing Bare Metal to Drug Eluting Stents for Intermediate Length Lesions of the SFA

Michael K. W. Lichtenberg MD, FESC on behalf of KANSHAS 1 investigators; Tepe G, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Deloose K, Verbist J, Goverde P, Zeller T

The Final Triumph Of Endovascular Therapy In SFA Treatment

A Data-driven Therapeutic Algorithm For Choosing Among Currently Available Tools For SFA Intervention

Update on Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) Below the Knee. Marianne Brodmann, MD Medical University Graz Graz, Austria

RANGER SFA REGISTRY Interim Analysis. Bernd Gehringhoff, MD On behalf the Ranger SFA Registry Investigators

ESVB State of the art: DES, DCB and the role of debulking. Gunnar Tepe, Rosenheim

PROGRAMME LEIPZIG INTERVENTIONAL COURSE

Clinical use and safety of the Lutonix DCB for the treatment of BTK: interim data from a prospective registry

BioMimics 3D in my Clinical Practice

Transcription:

LINC 2015, Leipzig A.Z. Sint-Blasius, Dendermonde Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden Patrick Peeters Jürgen Verbist OLV Hospital, Aalst RELINE-trial : 24 months results with the Viabahn vs PTA for in-stent restenosis Lieven Maene Roel Beelen R.Z. Heilig Hart, Tienen Koen Keirse Bart Joos Koen Deloose, MD FMRP 2015 1

Disclosure slide I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report: Consulting Employment in industry Stockholder of a healthcare company Owner of a healthcare company Other(s) I do not have any potential conflict of interest FMRP 2015 2

The results of modern generation stents? 1 yr ppr 1 yr CD-TLR mean LL 20-25% in-stent restenosis 85,5% 86% 80,4% 78% 22,6 9,9 6,2 6,6 9,0% Zilver PTX Complete SE Tigris Biomimics Resilient Stroll Durability II Durability I Supera Viastar Supera LL [1] Dake MD et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; [2] Scheinert D LINC 2013; [3] Laird JR et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; [4] Cordis SMART Control IFU 100000000922.1; [5] Matsumura JS J Vasc Surg. 2013;; [6] Bosiers M J Endovasc Ther. 2009; [7] Lammer J et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 With the courtesy of Medtronic Academia of Medical Education FMRP 2015 3

The results of modern generation stents? 20-25% in-stent restenosis Chemical block Inhibiting smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation Mechanical block Creating physical barrier & Remove the stimulus for ISR from the equation DEB DES Covered stents FMRP 2015 4

Chemical block Inhibiting SMC migration & proliferation : DEB Stabile et al. : single center registry (39 patients) on the use of DCB (IN.pact Admiral Medtronic) for treatment of femoral ISR (JACC 2012;60:1739-1742) Primary patency : 92.2% @ 12 months Primary patency : 70.3% @ 24 months FMRP 2015 5

Chemical block Inhibiting SMC migration & proliferation : DEB Liistro et al. : DEBATE ISR : single center registry on the use of DCB (IN.pact Admiral Medtronic ) for treatment of femoral ISR (JACC 2012:60:B97) 44 patients DCB vs historical cohort POBA (42) ; 100% diabetics MLL 131 mm PPR @ 12 months 80.5% - Freedom from TLR : 86.4% @ 12 months ; 68% @ 24 months FMRP 2015 6

Chemical block Inhibiting SMC migration & proliferation : DEB Krankenberg et al. : FAIR trial : multi-center randomized, controled trial on the use of DCB (IN.pact Admiral Medtronic ) and POBA for treatment of femoral ISR 119 patients : 62 DCB vs 57 POBA ; MLL 82 mm PPR @ 12 months 70.5% Presented @ LINC 2014, Leipzig, Germany Freedom from TLR : 90.8% @ 12 months FMRP 2015 7

Chemical block Inhibiting SMC migration & proliferation : DES Zilver PTX Single Arm Study, 787 patients, 119 ISR lesions, mll 133mm Zeller et al. JACC 2013;6:274-81 FMRP 2015 8

Mechanical block Creating physical barrier : Covered stents N of patients Average lesion length Primary patency Kazemi TCT 2006 Ansel 2007 Monahan JVS 2011 17 15 cm 65% @12M 27 26 cm 52% @18M 24 N/A 62% @12M Shamerri Ann Saudi Med 2012 24 24.5 cm 85.1%@12M -> non-randomized, single center data FMRP 2015 9

The RELINE Trial Physician initiated, randomized, controled, multi-center trial comparing the new generation Viabahn endoprothesis (Gore & Associates, Flagstaff,AZ) and POBA in the treatment of femoral in-stent restenosis FMRP 2015 10

The RELINE Trial 1:1 randomization 83 patients* Physician initiated, Rutherford randomized, 2-5 controled, multi-center trial comparing the new generation Viabahn endoprothesis (Gore & Associates, Flagstaff,AZ) and POBA in the treatment of femoral in-stent restenosis * After Protocol Deviations were excluded FMRP 2015 11

RELINE study : Endpoints Primary patency at 12 months no evidence of restenosis/occlusion within the treated lesion based on CFDU (peak systolic velocity ratio 2.5) & without TLR within 12 months Primary Patency at 24 months No evidence of restenosis/occlusion within the treated lesion based on CFDU (peak systolic velocity ratio 2.5) & without TLR within 24 months FMRP 2015 12

RELINE study : Inclusion criteria Rutherford classification 2-5 Ankle brachial index 0.8 Restenosis/reocclusion in a stent (implanted >30 days) in the superficial femoral artery Total target lesion length between 4-27 cm (comprising in stent restenosis and adjacent stenotic disease) FMRP 2015 13

RELINE study: Patient demographics Characteristic VIABAHN ISR N=39 General PTA N=44 p-value Male (%) Female (%) Age (min max; ±SD) 29 (74.4%) 10 (25.6%) 67.69 (49 86; 9.77) 32 (72.7%) 12 (27.3%) 68.98 (48 86; 9.71) 0.853 0.791 Rutherford categorization Claudication (R 2-3) (%) Critical Limb Ischemia (R 4-5) (%) 34 (87.2%) 5 (12.8%) 36 (81.8%) 8 (18.2%) 0.508 Rutherford 2 (%) Rutherford 3 (%) Rutherford 4 (%) Rutherford 5 (%) 12 (30.8%) 22 (56.4%) 4 (10.3%) 1 (2.6%) 5 (11.4%) 30 (68.2%) 3 (6.8%) 6 (13.6%) 0.065 FMRP 2015 14

RELINE study: Patient demographics Nicotine abuse Hypertension Diabetes Mellitus Renal insufficiency Hypercholesterolemia Obesity Characteristic Medical history Never Current Previous No Yes, medically treated Yes, not medically treated No Yes, insulin dependent Yes, non-insulin dependent No Yes No Yes No Yes VIABAHN ISR N=39 13 (33.3%) 16 (41.0%) 10 (25.6%) 12 (30.8%) 26 (66.7%) 1 (2.6%) 26 (66.7%) 6 (15.4%) 7 (17.9%) 37 (94.9%) 2 (5.1%) 22 (56.4%) 17 (43.6%) 28 (71.8%) 11 (28.2%) PTA N=44 12 (27.3%) 16 (36.4%) 16 (36.4%) 16 (36.4%) 27 (61.4%) 1 (2.3%) 28 (63.6%) 7 (15.9%) 9 (20.5%) 41 (93.2%) 3 (6.8%) 15 (34.1%) 29 (65.9%) 33 (75.0%) 11 (25.0%) p-value 0.569 0.865 0.951 0.889 0.069 0.935 FMRP 2015 15

The RELINE Trial : lesion characteristics Viabahn (N=39) PTA (N=44) Mean Lesion length 173 (30-330) Mean Lesion Length 190 (30-270)* stenosis (pre) 76.9 % stenosis (pre) 75.0 % chronic occlusion 20.5 % chronic occlusion 25.0 % acute occlusion 2.6 % acute occlusion 0.0 % Calcified lesion 33.3% Calcified lesion 25.0 %** 9 bail-out procedures after failed PTA FMRP 2015 16 * Missing data of 3 patients - ** Missing data of 1 patient

The RELINE Trial : 1 2 yr survival 1 year 2 year 91.9 % 86.1 % 95.3 % 93.0 % P=0.383 Number at risk baseline 1MFU 6MFU 12MFU 24MFU PTA 44 44 43 41 36 Viabahn 39 38 37 33 25 P=0.316 FMRP 2015 17

The RELINE Trial : 1 2 yr primary patency 1 year 2 year 74.8 % 58.4 % 28.0 % 11.6 % p<0.001 Number at risk baseline 1MFU 6MFU 12MFU 24MFU PTA 44 33 26 11 4 Viabahn 39 37 35 26 16 p<0.001 FMRP 2015 18

The RELINE Trial : 1 2 yr freedom TLR 1 year 2 year 80.0 % 66.3 % 42.0 % 23.0 % p<0.001 Number at risk baseline 1MFU 6MFU 12MFU 24MFU PTA 44 33 28 16 8 Viabahn 39 38 35 27 17 p<0.001 FMRP 2015 19

Conclusion There is some evidence that chemical solutions are valuable in the battle against ISR. The RELINE results prove, even on the longer run, that a mechanical barrier (like the Viabahn stentgraft) is also a promising tool for treatment of in-stent restenosis FMRP 2015 20

LINC 2015, Leipzig A.Z. Sint-Blasius, Dendermonde Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden Patrick Peeters Jürgen Verbist OLV Hospital, Aalst RELINE-trial : 24 months results with the Viabahn vs PTA for in-stent restenosis Lieven Maene Roel Beelen R.Z. Heilig Hart, Tienen Koen Keirse Bart Joos Koen Deloose, MD FMRP 2015 21