Stephen G. Worthley 1, Gerard T. Wilkins 2, Mark W. Webster 3,Joseph K. Montarello 1, Paul T. Antonis 4, Robert J. Whitbourn 5, Roderic J.

Similar documents
EnligHTN I, First-in-Human Multicenter Study of a Multi-Electrode Renal Denervation Catheter in Patients with Drug-Resistant Hypertension

Catheter-Based Renal Sympathetic Denervation in the Management of Resistant Hypertension

Devices and Long-Term Outcomes of Renal Denervation for Hypertension

Catheter-Based Renal Denervation (RDN)

What We've Learned from Simplicity HTN-1,2, and Registries

CATHETER-BASED RENAL DENERVATION INCREASES INSULIN SENSITIVITY AND IMPROVES GLUCOSE METABOLISM IN PATIENTS WITH RESISTANT HYPERTENSION

Catheter-Based Renal Denervation Reduces Total Body and Renal Noradrenaline Spillover and Blood Pressure in Resistant Hypertension

Φαρµακευτική θεραπεία υπερτασικών ασθενών. Δ. Τσιαχρής, Καρδιολόγος, Α Πανεπιστηµαική Καρδιολογική Κλινική

Byeong-Keuk Kim, MD, PhD. Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Percutaneous Renal Denervation: A New Promise in the Treatment of RHT?

Preliminary Results of RETREAT

Renal Denervation For Hypertension: Status Update

Transcatheter Perivascular Alcohol- Mediated Renal Denervation

Treating Hypertension With a Catheter..Wait What? David P. Lee, M.D. 22 June 2013 Stanford University

Renal Artery Denervation New Concepts in Hypertension Treatment

Radiofrequency Energy Provides Safe & Durable Blood Pressure Reduction: Complete 3 Year Results from Symplicity HTN-1

Delacroix et al Renal effects of renal denervation Supplementary Figure 1: Changes in Ambulatory Blood Pressures and Heart Rate

Real World Experience with Renal Denervation Therapy

SPYRAL HTN ON MED. Disclosure

DISCLOSURES OUTLINE OUTLINE 9/29/2014 ANTI-HYPERTENSIVE MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE

Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Treatment of Resistant Hypertension: 18-Month Results from the Symplicity HTN-2 Randomized Controlled Trial

Renal Sympathetic Denervation for HTN

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment. ACE Inhibitor and Angiotensin II Antagonist Combination Treatment GUIDELINES

Supplementary Online Content. Abed HS, Wittert GA, Leong DP, et al. Effect of weight reduction and

Renal Sympathetic Denervation Beyond Hypertension: Therapy for Arrhythmias and for Autonomic Nervous System Dysfunction?

Management of Resistant Hypertension in Diabetes

Renal sympathetic denervation as a potential treatment for hypertension

Hypertension Update Warwick Jaffe Interventional Cardiologist Ascot Hospital

Jared Moore, MD, FACP

Supplementary Appendix

The Global SYMPLICITY Registry: Safety and Effectiveness of Renal Artery Denervation In Real World Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension

Disclosures for Dr. Bhatt

RISE, FALL AND RESURRECTION OF RENAL DENERVATION. Michael A. Weber, MD State University of New York Downstate College of Medicine

CONCORD INTERNAL MEDICINE HYPERTENSION PROTOCOL

Hypertension Guidelines JNC Recommendations. Robert E. Bulow DO FACOI, FACC

Renal denervation: Current evidence and remaining uncertainties

Σύγτρονη θεραπεία της ανθεκτικής σπέρτασης

Treating Hypertension With a Catheter..Wait What? COI 5/3/2013. Worldwide Prevalence of Hypertension Is Increasing

egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

Life After CORAL: What Did CORAL Prove? David Paul Slovut, MD, PhD Co-director TAVR, Dir of Advanced Intervention

noradrenaline spillover and systemic blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Baroreflex amplificatie als behandeling voor hypertensie: hype of hoop? Wilko Spiering Afdeling Vasculaire Geneeskunde

Chapter Two Renal function measures in the adolescent NHANES population

Hypertension Guidelines 2017

Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)

The Future of Renal Denervation

major public health burden

Rationale: Objectives: Indication: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Study Investigators/Centers: 300 physicians in 292 clinics Research Methods: Data Source:

QUICK REFERENCE FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL MEDICINE WELCOMES

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. Supplementary Table 1. Baseline Patient Characteristics

Tread Carefully Because you Tread on my Nephrons. Prescribing Hints in Renal Disease

New Hypertension Guideline Recommendations for Adults July 7, :45-9:30am

Diabetes and Hypertension

How do we diagnose hypertension today? Presentation Subtitle

Trial to Reduce. Aranesp* Therapy. Cardiovascular Events with

HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES WHERE ARE WE IN 2014

PrOspective multicenter study of carotid artery stenting Usinng mer Stent OCEANUS study!!!

Treating Hypertension from

OLOMOUC I Study M. Táborský, M. Lazárová, J. Václavík, D. Richter ESC 2012, Munich,

BackBeat Cardiac Neuromodulation Therapy (CNT) for Immediate, Substantial and Sustained Lowering of Blood Pressure. Daniel Burkhoff MD PhD

Dr Doris M. W Kinuthia

Evidence Table. Study Type: Randomized controlled trial. Study Aim: To compare frequent nocturnal hemodialysis and conventional in-center dialysis.

SAFETY IN THE CATH LAB How to Minimise Contrast Toxicity

SPRINT: Consequences for CKD patients

COMPLEX HYPERTENSION. Anita Ralstin, FNP-BC Next Step Health Consultant, LLC

Christian Daugaard Peters, MD, PhD Department of Renal Medicine Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark Disclosures: None

Disclosure Information : No conflict of interest

Mihai Gheorghiade MD

Christopher Valentine, MD

Hypertension Update 2016 AREEF ISHANI, MD MS CHIEF OF MEDICINE MINNEAPOLIS VA MEDICAL CENTER PROFESSOR OF MEDICINE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA

Quality ID #122: Adult Kidney Disease: Blood Pressure Management National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

The New Hypertension Guidelines

Autumn Meeting Birmingham. Renal Denervation

CARDIOVASCULAR RISK FACTORS & TARGET ORGAN DAMAGE IN GREEK HYPERTENSIVES

A/Prof Gerard Wilkins. A/Proff of Medicine at Otago University Cardiac Services at Dunedin Hospital

Clinical Study Synopsis

30-Day Outcomes Following Implantation of a Repositionable Self-Expanding Aortic Bioprosthesis: First Report From the FORWARD Study

Management of Hypertension. M Misra MD MRCP (UK) Division of Nephrology University of Missouri School of Medicine

KEEP Summary Figures S32. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57(3)(suppl 2):S32-S56

Irbesartan Date: 22 June centers, China. Phase of development: Phase IV Date last patient/subject completed: Objectives:

Evidence of Baroreflex Activation Therapy s Mechanism of Action

Summary of recommendations

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript JAMA Intern Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 August 01.

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement. Objectives of the Presentation. Methods of Measuring BP: Pros and Cons

TIP. Documentation and coding guide. Disease definitions* Prevalence and statistics associated with HTN**

HYPERTENSION: UPDATE 2018

Patient is healthy with no chronic disease or significant risk factors [16%].

DISRUPT CAD. Todd J. Brinton, MD Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine Adjunct Professor of Bioengineering Stanford University

Impact of Nicorandil on Renal Function in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Pre-Existing Renal Dysfunction

RESISTENT HYPERTENSION. Dr. Helmy Bakr Professor and Head of Cardiology Dept. Mansoura University

Transcatheter Renal Denervation and Hong Kong Experience

Supplementary Online Content

Tailored bifurcation therapy

Optimal blood pressure targets in chronic kidney disease

JNC Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults

Ambulatory BP Monitoring: Getting the Diagnosis of Hypertension Right. Anthony J. Viera, MD, MPH, FAHA Professor and Chair

Duplex Ultrasound of the Renal Arteries. Duplex Ultrasound. In the Beginning

Managing HTN in the Elderly: How Low to Go

Transcription:

Six Month Results of First-in-Human Sympathetic Renal Artery Denervation Using a Next Generation Multi-Electrode Renal Artery Denervation System in Patients with Drug-Resistant Hypertension Stephen G. Worthley 1, Gerard T. Wilkins 2, Mark W. Webster 3,Joseph K. Montarello 1, Paul T. Antonis 4, Robert J. Whitbourn 5, Roderic J. Warren 6 1. St. Andrew s Hospital, ADELAIDE, AUSTRALIA 2. Dunedin Hospital, DUNEDIN, NEW ZEALAND 3. Auckland City Hospital, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND 4. Monash Heart, Monash Health, MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA 5. St. Vincent s Hospital, MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA 6. Royal Melbourne Hospital, MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA

Next Generation EnligHTN Product Description Proven ablation catheter Consistent, predictable 4 lesion ablation pattern Non-occluding, Nitinol basket design 8F compatible Simultaneous 60 second ablation Diagnostic mode designed to assess electrode apposition prior to ablation Report Summary tracks electrode activation time and average temperature for each electrode Touch-screen pole-mounted generator Time Impedance Maximum Power Temperature Default Settings 60 seconds simultaneous 100-400 Ω 8 Watts 70 degrees C 2

EnligHTN Procedure Proctoring Initial basket positioning proximal to the bifurcation Expand basket and perform generator diagnostic check for electrode contact ( 2ºC temp rise required) Simultaneous ablation - 60 seconds per basket set For a second set of ablations the basket is collapsed, pulled back 1 cm, rotated ~45 degrees and expanded, contact is checked and ablation sequence repeated Manually de-activate any electrodes that do not reach >50 degrees C by 20 seconds 3

EnligHTN III: FIH Next Generation Study Objective Design & Sample Size Primary Endpoints Follow-Up Schedule To establish initial safety and efficacy of the EnligHTN Next Generation Renal Denervation System utilizing simultaneous ablations. Prospective, multi-center, single arm, FIH study; similar study design & population as EnligHTN I Up to 50 subjects drug-resistant hypertension 6 international sites (Australia & New Zealand) Primary Efficacy: Reduction of Office SBP at 6 months Primary Safety: Adverse events at six (6) months Secondary: Reduction in ABP, renal function, renal safety 30 days, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post procedure Milestones 1 st Enrollment: Q2 2013 1/3 Month results: Presented at TCT Oct 2013, RHC, Trends 6 Month results: presented at EuroPCR May 2014 4

EnligHTN III Key Inclusion / Exclusion Criteria Inclusion Criteria Patient written informed consent Willing / able to comply with follow-up schedule 18 and 80 years old Appropriate renal artery anatomy Office systolic BP 160 mmhg Ambulatory systolic BP > 135 mmhg during screening period (daytime mean) Stable use of 3 antihypertensive medications concurrently at maximally tolerated doses for a minimum of 14 days prior to enrollment of which: one is a diuretic, or patient was on diuretic previously but documented to be diuretic intolerant Exclusion Criteria Prior renal artery intervention or evidence of renal artery disease (diameter stenosis > 30%) Multiple main renal arteries in either kidney or main renal arteries < 4 mm in diameter or < 20 mm in length egfr < 45 ml/min/1.73m 2 (MDRD formula) Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Secondary cause of hypertension Hemodynamically significant valvular heart disease 5

EnligHTN III Study Design Enrollment N=65 Screening Period Renal Denervation Eligible N=39 Not Eligible N=26 Denervation Arm N=39 Observation Arm N=0 24-Month Follow-up Current Status: N=39/39 1-Month Follow-ups Complete N=38/38 3-Month Follow-ups Complete N=37/38 6-Month Follow-ups Complete 1-Month Follow-up Primary Objectives: Safety (Adverse Events) and Efficacy (Office BP) at 6-Months Post-Procedure 6

EnligHTN III Baseline Characteristics Variable Mean ± Std (N) Age (Year) 63.49 ± 8.75 (39) BMI (kg/m²) 31.92 ± 5.17 (38) Gender (Female) 15/39 (38.5%) Coronary Artery Disease 6/39 (15.4%) Hyperlipidemia 23/39 (59.0%) Diabetes Type II 13/39 (33.3%) Obstructive Sleep Apnea 5/39 (12.8%) egfr (ml/min per 1.73m²) 73.97 ± 16.78 (38) Serum Creatinine (umol/l) 88.90 ± 19.39 (39) Cystatin C (mg/l) 1.03 ± 0.30 (37) Urine Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio (mg/g) 306.53 ± 841.90 (36) Number of Anti-Hypertensive Medications 4.67 ± 1.11 (39) Average Office Systolic BP (mmhg) 174.23 ± 12.71 (39) Average Office Diastolic BP (mmhg) 92.90 ± 14.99 (39) Average 24 Hour Ambulatory Systolic BP (mmhg) 154.85 ± 15.63 (39) Average 24 Hour Ambulatory Diastolic BP (mmhg) 82.08 ± 12.25 (39) Average Office Heart Rate (BPM) 67.67 ± 15.58 (39) 7 ID-2001024 A EN (05/14)

EnligHTN III Procedural Success and Ablation Time 100% of subjects that underwent the procedure received renal denervation in both arteries. Variable Mean ± Std (N) Ablations performed: Left renal artery 8.00 ± 0.69 (39) Ablations performed: Right renal artery 7.85 ± 0.49 (39) Total ablations performed 15.85 ± 1.01 (39) Total ablation sets 4.33 ± 0.62 (39) Ablation catheter insertion to removal time (min) 22.38 ± 11.78 (39) Total ablation time (min) 4.33 ± 0.62 (39) 8

EnligHTN III Safety Results: Adverse Events, Renal Function Adverse Events Serious Device or Procedure Related Adverse Events: NONE Non-Serious Device or Procedure Related Adverse Events Examples: vascular access site hematoma, vascular access site bruise, vascular access site drainage, hypotensive episodes, non-flow limiting vasospasm, back pain, pain, vascular access site pain Renal Function No clinically significant change in renal function through 6-months egfr (ml/min/1.73m 2 ) Baseline Mean ±SD (n) Month 1 Mean ±SD (n) Month 3 Mean ±SD (n) Month 6 Mean ±SD (n) 74.0 ± 16.8 (38) 75.9 ± 15.7 (39) 73.7 ± 16.4 (38) 73.8 ± 17.4 (37) Serum Creatinine (umol/l) 88.9 ± 19.4 (39) 86.7 ± 21.2 (39) 88.2 ± 24.4 (38) 88.3 ± 26.2 (37) Cystatin-C (mg/l) Urine Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio (mg/g) 1.03 ± 0.30 (37) 1.01 ± 0.28 (39) 1.04 ± 0.28 (35) 1.09 ± 0.30 (37) 306.5 ± 841.9 (36) 230.2 ± 659.0 (36) 106.0 ± 234.2 (33) 274.6 ± 613.2 (31) 9

EnligHTN III Office Blood Pressure Reduction From Baseline Change in Blood Pressure (mmhg) 0-5 -10-15 -20-25 -30-35 Month 1 (n=39) Month 3 (n=38) Month 6 (n=37) -7-9 -7-19 -26-25 95% CI -40 Systolic Diastolic <0.0001 0.0005 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 p-values 10

EnligHTN III 24 Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Reduction From Baseline Change in Blood Pressure (mmhg) 0-2 -4-6 -8-10 -12-14 -16 Month 1 (n=39) Month 3 (n=37) Month 6 (n=37) -4-4 -2-7 -8-10 95% CI -18 Systolic Diastolic -20 0.0030 0.0006 0.0002 0.0046 0.0008 0.1401 p-values 11

EnligHTN III Office Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction By Group Responder Rate: Defined as > 10 mmhg reduction from baseline value 67% at One-Month (n=26/39) 82% at Three-Months (n=31/38) 81% at Six-Months (n=30/37) Percentage of Patients 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 30.8 69.2 12.8 25.6 35.9 5.3 5.4 21.1 18.9 39.5 40.5 >=180 mmhg 160-179 mmhg 140-159 mmhg <140 mmhg 20% 10% 25.6 34.2 35.1 0% Baseline (n=39) Month 1 (n=39) Month 3 (n=38) Month 6 (n=37) 12

Summary Safety Efficiency No serious device related adverse events No serious procedure related adverse events No change in renal function 15.85 ablations per patient 4.3 minutes total ablation time Efficacy Sustained office and ambulatory blood pressure reduction observed through six months 13