Know Your Number Aggregate Report Comparison Analysis Between Baseline & Follow-up

Similar documents
Know Your Number Aggregate Report Single Analysis Compared to National Averages

Screening Results. Juniata College. Juniata College. Screening Results. October 11, October 12, 2016

Director, Employee Health & Productivity. Coordinator, Employee Health & Productivity

Your health is a crucial aspect of your life. That s why the Yakima Heart Center offers this booklet; to help you identify the numbers that affect

EVERY DAY A GUIDE TO KNOW YOUR NUMBERS

2017 Employee Wellness Health Assessment Report

SAMPLE 100 DAY JOURNEY GLOBAL BASELINE REPORT

Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Frank J. Green, M.D., F.A.C.C. St. Vincent Medical Group

Report Operation Heart to Heart

Figure S1. Comparison of fasting plasma lipoprotein levels between males (n=108) and females (n=130). Box plots represent the quartiles distribution

Looking Toward State Health Assessment.

!!! Aggregate Report Fasting Biometric Screening CLIENT!XXXX. May 2, ,000 participants

Depok-Indonesia STEPS Survey 2003

Heart Health. Team Member Workbook Session 1 LEARN IDENTIFY ACT. Learn about HTHU Level 3 and the point system

Why Screen at 23? What can YOU do?

Executive Summary Report Sample Executive Report Page 1

Client Report Screening Program Results For: Missouri Western State University October 28, 2013

Session 21: Heart Health

Statistical Fact Sheet Populations

To reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes among Oklahoma state employees.

Epidemiologic Measure of Association

MOLINA HEALTHCARE OF CALIFORNIA

2013 Hypertension Measure Group Patient Visit Form

7/6/2012. University Pharmacy 5254 Anthony Wayne Drive Detroit, MI (313)

Health Score SM Member Guide

Rick Fox M.A Health and Wellness Specialist

Your Name & Phone Number Here! Longevity Index

Individual Study Table Referring to Item of the Submission: Volume: Page:

Metabolic Syndrome: A Preventable & Treatable Cluster of Conditions

Understanding the metabolic syndrome

Table S1. Characteristics associated with frequency of nut consumption (full entire sample; Nn=4,416).

290 Biomed Environ Sci, 2016; 29(4):

Integrated Health/Person Centered Health Home Austin Travis County Integral Care

Health Risk Assessment

Put your Heart before your Head

ADHD and Adverse Health Outcomes in Adults

Chapter 18. Diet and Health

Established Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease (CHD)

PIEDMONT ACCESS TO HEALTH SERVICES, INC. Guidelines for Screening and Management of Dyslipidemia

Batch Upload Instructions

Mississippi Stroke Systems of Care

Nutrition Care Process. Catherine Villafranca & Anthony Richitt

Clinical Recommendations: Patients with Periodontitis

Corporate Health Screening

Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors:

Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Management Making a Difference

Test5, Here is Your My5 to Health Profile with Metabolic Syndrome Insight

Dietary recommendations in Obesity, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, and Diabetes. Stephen D. Sisson MD

CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH

Part 1: Obesity. Dietary recommendations in Obesity, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, and Diabetes 10/15/2018. Objectives.

Definition High Blood Pressure is a

Control Your Risk Factors

Implications of The LookAHEAD Trial: Is Weight Loss Beneficial for Patients with Diabetes?

Text-based Document. Predicting Factors of Body Fat of Metabolic Syndrome Persons. Downloaded 13-May :51:47.

Hypertension with Comorbidities Treatment of Metabolic Risk Factors in Children and Adolescents

WIN UTILIZATION REPORT 7/1/2010 TO 6/30/2011

Know your 5 BMI. Blood pressure. Weight. Cholesterol Blood sugar

Some college. Native American/ Other. 4-year degree 13% Grad work

programme. The DE-PLAN follow up.

Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia and Obesity. Mi-CCSI

Session 1 Knowledge Is Power: Know Your Risk for Heart Disease

RICHMOND PARK SCHOOL LIFESTYLE SCREENING REPORT Carmarthenshire County Council

High Blood Cholesterol What you need to know

BDS, MSc, MSPH, MHPE, FFPH, ScD. Associate Prof. of Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Associate Prof. Medical Education

Wellstream Personal Health Assessment Test Company Summary Report

The State of Play of Diabetes Indicators

The Heart of a Woman. Karen E. Friday, M.D. Associate Professor of Medicine Section of Endocrinology Louisiana State University School of Medicine

Baptist Health Nassau Community Health Needs Assessment Priorities Implementation Plans

Baptist Health Beaches Community Health Needs Assessment Priorities Implementation Plans

2018 Executive Summary

For instance, it can harden the arteries, decreasing the flow of blood and oxygen to the heart. This reduced flow can cause

CARE PATHWAYS. Allyson Ashley

Total risk management of Cardiovascular diseases Nobuhiro Yamada

Guidelines on cardiovascular risk assessment and management

Heart Disease Risk Factors

Statin therapy in patients with Mild to Moderate Coronary Stenosis by 64-slice Multidetector Coronary Computed Tomography

Is Knowing Half the Battle? Behavioral Responses to Risk Information from the National Health Screening Program in Korea

2003 World Health Organization (WHO) / International Society of Hypertension (ISH) Statement on Management of Hypertension.

Health First. New Health Bucks Program MANATEE YOURCHOICE HEALTH PLAN

A n aly tical m e t h o d s

HEALTH/MEDICAL QUESTIONNAIRE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY READINESS QUESTIONNAIRE (PAR-Q)

Date of Birth. Black/African American. What is your occupation? Retired? Yes No

Effective Interventions in the Clinical Setting: Engaging and Empowering Patients. Michael J. Bloch, M.D. Doina Kulick, M.D.

Risk Factors for Heart Disease

Chapter 08. Health Screening and Risk Classification

Know Your Numbers. Your guide to maintaining good health. Helpful information from Providence Medical Center and Saint John Hospital

Association between Raised Blood Pressure and Dysglycemia in Hong Kong Chinese

Managing Cholesterol

SCIENTIFIC STUDY REPORT

Section 03: Pre Exercise Evaluations and Risk Factor Assessment

Know Your Numbers Your Most Vital Statistic

WIN QUARTERLY UTILIZATION REPORT 7/1/2010 TO 12/31/2010. EXPERTISE PARTNERSHIP V A L U E April 20, 2011

Table of Contents. Health Risk Factors. Healthy Behaviors. GoRedForWomen.org. Cholesterol Diabetes Heart Attack and Stroke High Blood Pressure

Heart disease and stroke major health problems

Supplementary Online Content

Live Healthy. Live Blue. Live Healthy. Live Blue. Wellness Guide

DIABETES. A growing problem

Supplementary Online Content

Making Changes: Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Binge Eating Disorder. Michele Laliberte, Ph.D., C.Psych.

Metabolic Syndrome. Shon Meek MD, PhD Mayo Clinic Florida Endocrinology

Transcription:

Know Your Number Aggregate Report Comparison Analysis Between Baseline & Follow-up... Study Population: 340... Total Population: 500... Time Window of Baseline: 09/01/13 to 12/20/13... Time Window of Follow-up: 08/04/14 to 12/14/14...... Version of Report: V10.2... Know Your Number Powered by BIOSIGNIA

Page 2 Participants Included and/or Excluded from Report Baseline Follow-up Number of participants 404 434 Number of KYN records 404 434 Number of participants with KYN record(s) in both Baseline and Follow-up Total number of participants excluded due to reasons listed below Total number of participants included in present analysis 346 6 340 Note: If more than one KYN record existed for a given participant in the time window selected, the earliest baseline record and the most recent follow-up record were selected. If applicable, participants were excluded from this report if:¹ Number of baseline participants excluded Number of follow-up participants excluded Currently pregnant 3 0 Age: < 21 years or > 80 years 1 0 Required risk factor entered as range or unknown 2 0 Risk factor with outlier values as follows: HDL: < 1 mg/dl or > 500 mg/dl 0 0 Triglycerides: < 1 mg/dl or > 2000 mg/dl 0 0 Total cholesterol: < 1 mg/dl or > 999 mg/dl 0 0 Fasting glucose: < 1 mg/dl or > 500 mg/dl 0 0 Pulse rate: < 10 bpm or > 500 bpm 0 0 Waist measurement: < 0 inches or > 100 inches 0 0 Body weight: < 36 pounds or > 800 pounds 0 0 Diastolic blood pressure: < 10 mmhg or > 500 mmhg 0 0 Systolic blood pressure: < 10 mmhg or > 500 mmhg 0 0 Height: < 2 feet or > 10 feet 0 0 ¹ Participants who meet more than one exclusion criteria may be included in multiple categories.

Page 3 Study Population Demographics Gender Number % Male 127 37.4 Female 213 62.6 Total 340 100 62.6% 37.4% Male Female 40 Age (years) Number % 21-30 33 9.7 31-40 50 14.7 41-50 93 27.4 51-60 121 35.6 61-70 39 11.5 71-80 4 1.2 Total 340 100 Percentage 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 Age (years) Race Number % White 237 69.7 Black 87 25.6 Asian 0 0.0 Hispanic 13 3.8 Others 3 0.9 Total 340 100 White Black Asian Hispanic Others Note: Values throughout this report have been rounded for ease of presentation.

Page 4 Health Status and Risk Factor Profile: Changes Between Baseline and Follow-up Evaluations Clinical Measures Baseline (%) Follow-up (%) Difference¹ (%) Change² (%) Metabolic syndrome³ 27.9 26.5-1.5-5.3 Overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m²) 33.5 36.8 3.2 9.6 Obese (BMI 30 kg/m²) 42.9 37.9-5.0-11.6 Large waist (males > 40", females > 35") 38.8 43.5 4.7 12.1 Prehypertensive (120/80-139/89 mmhg) 49.7 51.2 1.5 3.0 Hypertensive ( 140/90 mmhg) 25.9 23.2-2.6-10.2 Total cholesterol 200 mg/dl 42.9 40.6-2.4-5.5 HDL < 40 mg/dl 13.5 16.8 3.2 23.9 LDL 130 mg/dl 29.1 26.8-2.4-8.1 LDL ATP III-suggested goal 26.2 25.3-0.9-3.4 Triglycerides 150 mg/dl 31.2 23.8-7.4-23.6 Undiagnosed diabetic (glucose 126 mg/dl) 2.4 2.4 0.0 0.0 Prediabetic (glucose 100-125 mg/dl) 16.2 12.4-3.8-23.6 Self-reported Conditions Diabetes 10.3 11.2 0.9 8.6 Coronary Heart Disease 2.4 1.8-0.6-25.0 Stroke 0.9 0.6-0.3-33.3 Congestive Heart Failure 0.9 0.6-0.3-33.3 Other Cardiovascular Diseases 0.9 0.6-0.3-33.3 Hypertension⁴ 37.6 42.1 4.4 11.7 Hyperlipidemia⁴ 32.4 31.8-0.6-1.8 On antihypertensive medication 33.5 37.9 4.4 13.2 On lipid-lowering medication 18.8 19.1 0.3 1.6 Current smoker 18.2 17.6-0.6-3.2 Physical exercise level Low 42.4 40.0-2.4-5.6 Moderate 41.8 41.8 0.0 0.0 15.9 18.2 2.4 14.8 ¹ Difference (%) = Follow-up (%) minus Baseline (%) ² Change (%) = Difference (%) divided by Baseline (%) ³ The metabolic syndrome categorization, as described in the ATP III guideline, includes only those surveyed participants who reported actual values for triglycerides, HDL, blood pressure, and glucose. Participants reporting Unknown or categorical ranges for these data points are excluded from the metabolic syndrome categorization. ⁴ Condition not applicable for KYN v2 questionnaire models.

Page 5 Health Status and Risk Factor Profile: Changes Between Baseline & Follow-up (continued) Males Clinical Measures Baseline (%) Follow-up (%) Difference (%) Change (%) Metabolic syndrome 26.0 28.3 2.4 9.1 Overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m²) 38.6 40.2 1.6 4.1 Obese (BMI 30 kg/m²) 37.8 35.4-2.4-6.2 Waist circumference > 40 inches 24.4 28.3 3.9 16.1 Prehypertensive (120/80-139/89 mmhg) 57.5 53.5-3.9-6.8 Hypertensive ( 140/90 mmhg) 28.3 28.3 0.0 0.0 Total cholesterol 200 mg/dl 40.9 37.8-3.1-7.7 HDL < 40 mg/dl 22.8 27.6 4.7 20.7 LDL 130 mg/dl 24.4 27.6 3.1 12.9 LDL ATP III-suggested goal 28.3 29.1 0.8 2.8 Triglycerides 150 mg/dl 38.6 29.1-9.4-24.5 Undiagnosed diabetic (glucose 126 mg/dl) 3.1 3.1 0.0 0.0 Prediabetic (glucose 100-125 mg/dl) 15.0 18.1 3.1 21.1 Self-reported Conditions Diabetes 14.2 12.6-1.6-11.1 Coronary Heart Disease 3.1 3.1 0.0 0.0 Stroke 0.8 1.6 0.8 100.0 Congestive Heart Failure 0.8 0.0-0.8-100.0 Other Cardiovascular Diseases 1.6 0.8-0.8-50.0 Hypertension 40.2 44.1 3.9 9.8 Hyperlipidemia 36.2 33.9-2.4-6.5 On antihypertensive medication 37.0 39.4 2.4 6.4 On lipid-lowering medication 22.8 22.8 0.0 0.0 Current smoker 23.6 22.0-1.6-6.7 Physical exercise level Low 38.6 42.5 3.9 10.2 Moderate 40.2 33.9-6.3-15.7 21.3 23.6 2.4 11.1

Page 6 Health Status and Risk Factor Profile: Changes Between Baseline & Follow-up (continued) Females Clinical Measures Baseline (%) Follow-up (%) Difference (%) Change (%) Metabolic syndrome 29.1 25.4-3.8-12.9 Overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m²) 30.5 34.7 4.2 13.8 Obese (BMI 30 kg/m²) 46.0 39.4-6.6-14.3 Waist circumference > 35 inches 47.4 52.6 5.2 10.9 Prehypertensive (120/80-139/89 mmhg) 45.1 49.8 4.7 10.4 Hypertensive ( 140/90 mmhg) 24.4 20.2-4.2-17.3 Total cholesterol 200 mg/dl 44.1 42.3-1.9-4.3 HDL < 40 mg/dl 8.0 10.3 2.3 29.4 LDL 130 mg/dl 31.9 26.3-5.6-17.6 LDL ATP III-suggested goal 24.9 23.0-1.9-7.5 Triglycerides 150 mg/dl 26.8 20.7-6.1-22.8 Undiagnosed diabetic (glucose 126 mg/dl) 1.9 1.9 0.0 0.0 Prediabetic (glucose 100-125 mg/dl) 16.9 8.9-8.0-47.2 Self-reported Conditions Diabetes 8.0 10.3 2.3 29.4 Coronary Heart Disease 1.9 0.9-0.9-50.0 Stroke 0.9 0.0-0.9-100.0 Congestive Heart Failure 0.9 0.9 0.0 0.0 Other Cardiovascular Diseases 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 Hypertension 36.2 40.8 4.7 13.0 Hyperlipidemia 30.0 30.5 0.5 1.6 On antihypertensive medication 31.5 37.1 5.6 17.9 On lipid-lowering medication 16.4 17.8 1.4 8.6 Current smoker 15.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 Physical exercise level Low 44.6 38.5-6.1-13.7 Moderate 42.7 46.5 3.8 8.8 12.7 15.0 2.3 18.5

Page 7 Mean Clinical Measures: Changes Between Baseline and Follow-up Evaluations Clinical Measures Weight (pounds) BMI (kg/m²) Waist (inches) Systolic blood pressure (mmhg) Diastolic blood pressure (mmhg) Total cholesterol (mg/dl) HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) Triglycerides (mg/dl) Fasting glucose (mg/dl) Weight (pounds) BMI (kg/m²) Waist (inches) Systolic blood pressure (mmhg) Diastolic blood pressure (mmhg) Total cholesterol (mg/dl) HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) Triglycerides (mg/dl) Fasting glucose (mg/dl) Weight (pounds) BMI (kg/m²) Waist (inches) Systolic blood pressure (mmhg) Diastolic blood pressure (mmhg) Total cholesterol (mg/dl) HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) Triglycerides (mg/dl) Fasting glucose (mg/dl) Baseline (%) Follow-up (%) Difference¹ (%) Change² (%) Study Population 189.0 185.3-3.7-1.9 29.9 29.2-0.7-2.2 36.4 36.9 0.5 1.3 126.5 124.9-1.7-1.3 81.5 80.4-1.1-1.3 193.6 190.3-3.3-1.7 54.6 55.4 0.8 1.5 112.8 110.5-2.4-2.1 133.5 124.0-9.5-7.1 100.3 98.8-1.6-1.6 Males 205.3 202.6-2.6-1.3 29.3 29.0-0.4-1.3 37.9 37.9 0.0 0.1 130.3 128.1-2.2-1.7 82.2 80.4-1.8-2.2 189.9 186.7-3.2-1.7 49.9 51.0 1.1 2.1 110.9 108.7-2.2-2.0 152.2 136.7-15.5-10.2 99.1 100.3 1.2 1.2 Females 179.3 175.0-4.3-2.4 30.2 29.4-0.8-2.7 35.6 36.3 0.8 2.1 124.3 123.0-1.3-1.1 81.1 80.5-0.7-0.8 195.8 192.4-3.4-1.7 57.5 58.1 0.6 1.1 114.0 111.5-2.5-2.2 122.4 116.4-6.0-4.9 101.1 97.8-3.2-3.2 ¹ Difference (%) = Follow-up (%) minus Baseline (%) ² Change (%) = Difference (%) divided by Baseline (%)

Page 8 Distribution of Population Disease Risks by Percentile DIABETES Above Below Low CORONARY HEART DISEASE Above Below Low Baseline 22% 18% 22% 17% 21% Baseline 15% 2 22% 22% 21% Follow-up 16% 21% 17% 21% 25% Follow-up 11% 2 2 26% 23% Baseline N¹ = 297 Baseline N = 340 Follow-up N = 294 Follow-up N = 340 3 3 25% 25% 2 2 15% 15% 1 1 5% 5% Above Below Low Above Below Low STROKE CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Above Below Low Above Below Low Baseline 23% 22% 25% 14% 16% Baseline 2 27% 2 16% 17% Follow-up 19% 21% 25% 18% 17% Follow-up 21% 18% 23% 19% 19% Baseline N = 340 Baseline N = 250 3 25% 2 15% 1 5% Follow-up N = 340 Follow-up N = 255 3 25% 2 15% 1 5% Above Below Low Above Below Low Disease risk is classified by an age- and gender-specific risk percentile as follows: Above Below Low 80th percentile 60th and < 80th percentile 40th and < 60th percentile 20th and < 40th percentile < 20th percentile No data are available for COPD and lung cancer because those models were only run for smokers. ¹ N refers to the number of people who received a KYN risk percentile for the specific disease. Self-reported diabetics and participants with a fasting glucose 126 mg/dl are excluded from the diabetes assessment. Individuals reporting a prior stroke event may be excluded from the stroke assessment. Self-reported heart failure diagnosis and individuals under the age of 41 years are excluded from the congestive heart failure assessment.

Date of Report: 07/21/15 Page 9 Projected Number of Total¹, Avoidable², and Inherent³ Cases of Disease Onset Within the Next Five Years: Changes Between Baseline & Follow-up Study Population N = 340 Disease Baseline Follow-up Change Total Avoidable Total Avoidable Total Avoidable Diabetes 15.57 13.01 13.62 11.15-13% -14% CHD 9.65 6.03 9.18 5.41-5% -1 Stroke 5.10 2.71 4.58 2.16-1 -2 CHF 3.59 1.26 3.36 1.06-6% -16% COPD 3.56 1.47 3.51 1.45-1% -1% Lung Cancer 0.32 0.18 0.23 0.14-29% -22% Total 37.79 24.66 34.48 21.37-9% -13% Number of Cases 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Contribution of Risk Factors to Avoidable Cases Risk Factor Weight Blood Pressure Exercise Smoking Cholesterol Glucose Total Avoidable Cases Baseline Follow-up 12.79 11.11 3.34 3.00 2.31 2.10 3.42 2.95 1.81 0.99 1.61 0.59 24.66 21.37 Change -13% -1-9% -14% -11% -4-13% ¹ "Total cases" is the projected number of new cases in the study population over the next 5 years. ² "Avoidable cases" is the number of new cases that may be avoided in the next 5 years if all modifiable risk factors are brought within the normal range. ³ Inherent cases is the projected number of new cases in the next 5 years attributed to nonmodifiable risk and modifiable risk factors within normal range.

Date of Report: 07/21/15 Page 10 Projected Number of Total¹, Avoidable², and Inherent³ Cases of Disease Onset Within the Next Five Years: Changes Between Baseline & Follow-up Extrapolation⁴ to Total Population Total Population N = 500 Disease Baseline Follow-up Change Total Avoidable Total Avoidable Total Avoidable Diabetes 22.89 19.13 20.03 16.40-13% -14% CHD 14.19 8.87 13.49 7.95-5% -1 Stroke 7.50 3.99 6.74 3.18-1 -2 CHF 5.28 1.86 4.95 1.56-6% -16% COPD 5.24 2.16 5.17 2.14-1% -1% Lung Cancer 0.47 0.27 0.33 0.21-29% -22% Total 55.58 36.26 50.71 31.42-9% -13% 25 Number of Cases 20 15 10 5 0 Contribution of Risk Factors to Avoidable Cases Risk Factor Avoidable Cases Baseline Follow-up Change Weight 18.81 16.34-13% Blood Pressure 4.91 4.40-1 Exercise 3.40 3.09-9% Smoking 5.03 4.33-14% Cholesterol 2.66 2.37-11% Glucose 1.46 0.87-4 Aspirin 0.00 0.00 - Total 36.26 31.42-13% ¹ "Total cases" is the projected number of new cases in the study population over the next 5 years. ² "Avoidable cases" is the number of new cases that may be avoided in the next 5 years if all modifiable risk factors are brought within the normal range. ³ Inherent cases is the projected number of new cases in the next 5 years attributed to nonmodifiable risk and modifiable risk factors within normal range. ⁴ This extrapolation assumes that the study population is a representative subset of the larger total population.

Page 11 Projected Five-year Cost¹ of Future Chronic Disease Onset: Changes Between Baseline and Follow-up Study Population² Study Population N = 340 Diseases Baseline Follow-up Difference³ Diabetes $512,958 $448,774 -$64,185 Coronary Heart Disease $382,360 $363,610 -$18,750 Stroke $165,071 $148,350 -$16,722 Congestive Heart Failure $82,452 $77,168 -$5,284 COPD $41,817 $41,222 -$595 Lung Cancer $114,824 $82,055 -$32,769 All Diseases $1,299,483 $1,161,178 -$138,305 Extrapolation to Total Population⁴ Total Population N = 500 Diseases Baseline Follow-up Difference Diabetes $754,351 $659,962 -$94,389 Coronary Heart Disease $562,294 $534,720 -$27,574 Stroke $242,752 $218,161 -$24,591 Congestive Heart Failure $121,253 $113,482 -$7,771 COPD $61,496 $60,621 -$875 Lung Cancer $168,859 $120,670 -$48,189 All Diseases $1,911,004 $1,707,615 -$203,389 ¹ Projected costs = R * C * (4.5 + 3.625 * I + 2.75 * I² + 1.875 * I³ + I⁴) 5 R = 5-year estimated total cases in study population; C = assumed annual disease cost (noted below), I = annual inflation rate + 1 ² Study population is the population who participated in Know Your Number. ³ Difference = Follow-up projected costs minus Baseline projected costs. ⁴ This extrapolation assumes that the study population is a representative subset of the larger total population. The KYN disease costs are based on annual estimates and include direct and indirect medical costs associated with the occurrence of each disease. Estimates are calculated using recent average U.S. costs as reported by the American Diabetes Association, the American Heart Association, the American Stroke Association, the American Lung Association, the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, and the National Cancer Institute. The estimated, per-participant costs used in this report are as follows: diabetes = $11,036; coronary heart disease = $13,273; stroke = $10,838; heart failure = $7,686; COPD = $3,929; and lung cancer = $120,799, with an assumed annual inflation rate = 6%

Date of Report: 07/21/15 Page 12 KYN Risk Tracker¹: Population Analysis Study Population² N = 340 Baseline Value: 69 Follow-up Value: 66 Classification: Optimal Normal Above Normal Borderline Extremely Ranges: 0-19 20-39 40-59 60-79 80-99 100 Baseline 0.6% 9.1% 30. 31.8% 18.2% 10.3% Follow-up 1.2% 10.9% 30.3% 32.6% 16.8% 8.2% Change 0.6% 1.8% 0.3% 0.9% -1.5% -2.1% 4 Baseline Compared to Follow-up 3 2 1 Baseline Follow-up Optimal Normal Above Normal Borderline Extremely KYN Risk Tracker Value by Classification: Focus on the Baseline Cohort³ Extremely Borderline Above Normal Normal Optimal Baseline Baseline Cohort at Follow-up Difference 115 109-6 88 84-4 71 51 32 67 51 33-4 0 1 18 25 7 Avoidable Disease Burden Cost: Focus on the Baseline Cohort³ Baseline Extremely $285,312 $268,858 Borderline $254,127 Above Normal $56,987 Normal $1,329 Optimal $0 Total $866,613 Baseline Cohort at Follow-up $232,474 $240,641 $207,731 $60,859 $1,839 $26 $743,571 Difference -$52,838 -$28,217 -$46,396 $3,872 $510 $26 -$123,041 ¹ KYN Risk Tracker is a summation of a participant's overall health risk based on their individual disease risk for diabetes, CHD, and stroke combined with other biometric and clinical risk factor contributions. ² Includes only those participants with a KYN Risk Tracker value at both baseline and follow-up assessments. ³ Baseline cohort: a subgroup of baseline participants evaluated at the follow-up interval (i.e., same individuals at both time periods).

Date of Report: 07/21/15 Page 13 KYN Risk Tracker: Population Analysis (continued) Extremely Borderline Above Normal Normal Optimal Movement between KYN Risk Tracker Classifications: Baseline to Follow-up Baseline # participants Follow-up # participants Moved In Change Moved Out Percentage 35 28 4 11-7 -2 62 57 19 24-5 -8% 108 111 36 33 3 3% 102 103 26 25 1 1% 31 37 14 8 6 19% 2 4 4 2 2 10 Net Detailed Participant Movement between KYN Risk Tracker Classifications: Baseline to Follow-up Follow-up Extremely Borderline Above Normal Normal Optimal Extremely 24 10 1 0 0 0 35 4 38 19 1 0 0 62 Baseline Borderline 0 8 75 21 3 1 108 Above Normal 0 1 15 77 9 0 102 Normal 0 0 1 4 23 3 31 Optimal 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 28 57 111 103 37 4 Values highlighted along the diagonal (middle) show participants who remained in the same risk category at baseline and follow-up evaluations. Values above the diagonal (lighter shading in upper right) show participants who lowered their risk category between baseline and follow-up. Values below the diagonal (darker shading in lower left) show participants who had an increase in risk category between baseline and follow-up periods. Overall Population Movement Summary No Change Increased Risk Classification Decreased Risk Classification # Participants Percentage 237 69.7% 35 10.3% 68 20.

Wellness Assessment: Changes Between Baseline & Follow-up¹ Dietary Assessment N = 133 Baseline Follow-up Difference² fat 29.3% 39.8% 10.5% Low fruit / vegetable 20.3% 8.3% -12. Others³ 50.4% 51.9% 1.5% Readiness to Change⁴ Diet N = 38 Pre- Contemplation 18.4% 23.7% 5.3% Preparation / Action 68.4% 52.6% -15.8% Maintenance 13.2% 23.7% 10.5% 10 8 6 4 2 Distribution of Readiness to Change (Diet): Baseline to Follow-up Pre- Contemplation Preparation / Action Maintenance Page 14 N = 122 Readiness to Change Weight Baseline Follow-up Difference Overweight (25-29.9 kg/m²) Pre-Contemplation 4.9% 5.7% 0.8% Contemplation 21.3% 18.9% -2.5% Preparation 14.8% 13.1% -1.6% Action 3.3% 9. 5.7% Maintenance 3.3% 0. -3.3% Obese ( 30 kg/m²) Pre-Contemplation 0. 0. 0. Contemplation 12.3% 13.9% 1.6% Preparation 32. 31.1% -0.8% Action 8.2% 8.2% 0. Maintenance 0. 0. 0. Total Pre-Contemplation 4.9% 5.7% 0.8% Contemplation 33.6% 32.8% -0.8% Preparation 46.7% 44.3% -2.5% Action 11.5% 17.2% 5.7% Maintenance 3.3% 0. -3.3% 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Distribution of Readiness to Change (Weight): Baseline to Follow-up ¹ Comparisons are made only between participants who answered the applicable questions at baseline and follow-up evaluations and are reflected in the sample size (N). ² Difference (%) = Follow-up (%) minus Baseline (%) ³ "Others" refers to any participants who do not consume a high fat or low fruit / vegetable diet. These participants are excluded from the Readiness-to-Change table. ⁴ See appendix for Readiness-to-Change Category Explanations. N/A: To maintain privacy, at least 25 participants must complete the corresponding assessment for results to be reported.

Page 15 Wellness Assessment (continued) Readiness to Change Exercise Level¹ N = 104 Baseline Follow-up Difference Pre-Contemplation 5.8% 12.5% 6.7% Contemplation / Preparation 75. 79.8% 4.8% Action 19.2% 7.7% -11.5% 10 5 Distribution of Readiness to Change (Exercise): Baseline to Follow-up Pre-Contemplation Contemplation / Preparation Action Readiness to Change Smoking Cessation² N = 29 Baseline Follow-up Difference Pre-Contemplation 10.3% 6.9% -3.4% Contemplation 13.8% 10.3% -3.4% Preparation 10.3% 6.9% -3.4% Action 3.4% 6.9% 3.4% Maintenance 62.1% 69. 6.9% 10 8 6 4 2 Distribution of Readiness to Change (Smoking): Baseline to Follow-up N = 93 Stress Status Baseline Follow-up Difference Low 69.9% 95.7% 25.8% Moderate 9.7% 1.1% -8.6% 20.4% 3.2% -17.2% N = 218 Depression Assessment³ Baseline Follow-up Difference Score > 8 13.3% 0.9% -12.4% 10 5 Distribution of Stress Status: Baseline to Follow-up Low Moderate ¹ Only participants classified as "moderate" or "low" exercise level evaluation were included. ² Only participants who responded as "current smokers" or "past smokers" were included. ³ Using the Depression Scale Questionnaire from the Center for Epidemiological Studies, a score greater than 8 indicates possible depression.

Appendix: Readiness-to-Change Category Explanations Categories listed below correspond to the associated questionnaire responses. Page 16 Nutrition Pre-Contemplation Preparation / Action Maintenance Weight Pre-Contemplation Contemplation Preparation Action Maintenance Exercise Pre-Contemplation Contemplation / Preparation Action Smoking Which of the following best describes your attitude toward your eating habits? I am satisfied with what I eat and have no plans to change it. I would like to reduce the amount of unhealthy foods I eat and adopt a healthier diet. I recently made significant changes to my eating habits. Which of the following best describes your attitude toward your body weight? I do not have a problem with my body weight, and I do not need to lose weight. I have a small problem with my weight, and I should lose some. I am trying not to gain more weight. I am seriously considering trying to lose weight to reach my weight goal in the next 6 months. I have started losing weight within the last 6 months. I am trying to reach my weight goal in the next 6 months. I have kept off the weight I lost more than 6 months ago. Which of the following best describes your attitude toward physical exercise? I do not need more physical exercise. I would like to exercise more. I have just recently started or at least seriously considered exercising more. If you currently smoke, answer the following Yes or No questions. 1. Do you plan to quit smoking in the next 6 months? 2. Do you plan to quit smoking in the next 30 days? 3. Have you successfully attempted to quit for 24 hours or more in the past year? Pre-Contemplation If answered no to question 1. Contemplation Preparation If answered yes to question 1, but no to one of the other questions. If answered yes to all 3 questions. If you previously smoked, when did you quit? Action Maintenance I quit smoking less than 6 months ago. I quit smoking more than 6 months ago.