Uric acid and prognosis in angiography-proven coronary artery disease

Similar documents
Impact of coronary atherosclerotic burden on clinical presentation and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease

Prognostic Significance of Epicardial Blood Flow Before and After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

Relationship between body mass index, coronary disease extension and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Randomized Comparison of Prasugrel and Bivalirudin versus Clopidogrel and Heparin in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Supplementary Online Content

Gender Differences in the Role of Serum Uric Acid for Predicting Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

Influence of Planned Six-Month Follow-Up Angiography on Late Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A Randomized Study

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY VOL. 68, NO. 21, 2016 ª 2016 BY THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY FOUNDATION

Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on Long-Term Outcome in Coronary Bypass Candidates Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Serum Creatinine and Blood Urea Nitrogen Levels in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

GALECTIN-3 PREDICTS LONG TERM CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN HIGH-RISK CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PATIENTS

Serum Uric Acid Level in Hypertensive Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

Statistical analysis plan

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

Central pressures and prediction of cardiovascular events in erectile dysfunction patients

The prognostic role of serum uric acid level in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction

Supplementary Appendix

CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial)

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Coronary Implantation of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

Statin pretreatment and presentation patterns in patients with acute coronary syndromes

Effect of upstream clopidogrel treatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI

Revascularization after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation or Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease

ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions

Serum uric acid levels improve prediction of incident Type 2 Diabetes in individuals with impaired fasting glucose: The Rancho Bernardo Study

Diabetic Patients: Current Evidence of Revascularization

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

What is the Optimal Triple Anti-platelet Therapy Duration in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Drug-eluting Stents Implantation?

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 35, No. 5, by the American College of Cardiology ISSN /00/$20.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Contrast Induced Nephropathy

A: Epidemiology update. Evidence that LDL-C and CRP identify different high-risk groups

Exercise treadmill testing is frequently used in clinical practice to

Abciximab plus Heparin versus Bivalirudin in Patients with NSTEMI Undergoing PCI. ISAR-REACT 4 Trial

ARMYDA-RECAPTURE (Atorvastatin for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) trial

Impaired Chronotropic Response to Exercise Stress Testing in Patients with Diabetes Predicts Future Cardiovascular Events

Low fractional diastolic pressure in the ascending aorta increased the risk of coronary heart disease

Supplementary Online Content

Uric acid in Chronic Heart Failure; Correlation with Prognostic Markers

Subclinical atherosclerosis in CVD: Risk stratification & management Raul Santos, MD

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting vs. Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Multivessel Disease in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Polymer-Free Stent CX - ISAR

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

Clinical Investigations

The MAIN-COMPARE Registry

Clinical Study Age Differences in Long Term Outcomes of Coronary Patients Treated with Drug Eluting Stents at a Tertiary Medical Center

Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD

Novel Risk Markers in ACS (Hyperglycemia, Anemia, GFR)

Incidence and Predictors of Stent Thrombosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction

High-sensitivity Troponin T Predicts Recurrent Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Stable Coronary Heart Disease: KAROLA Study 8 Year FU

Supplementary Appendix

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction and Clinical Outcome In Bifurcation Lesion

The Framingham Coronary Heart Disease Risk Score

Alex versus Xience Registry Preliminary report

A Randomized Comparison of Clopidogrel and Aspirin Versus Ticlopidine and Aspirin After the Placement of Coronary Artery Stents

Nine-year clinical outcomes of drug-eluting stents vs. bare metal stents for large coronary vessel lesions

CAD in Chronic Kidney Disease. Kuang-Te Wang

Komplexe Koronarintervention heute: Von Syntax zu bioresorbierbaren Stents

Soo LIM, MD, PHD Internal Medicine Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

In-Ho Chae. Seoul National University College of Medicine

The Whitehall II study originally comprised 10,308 (3413 women) individuals who, at

Morbidity & Mortality from Chronic Kidney Disease

ARIC Manuscript Proposal # PC Reviewed: 2/10/09 Status: A Priority: 2 SC Reviewed: Status: Priority:

ISSN X (Print) Original Research Article. *Corresponding author Vaibhav. V. Biyani

Unprotected LM intervention

Dr. Mehmet Kanbay Department of Medicine Division of Nephrology Istanbul Medeniyet University School of Medicine Istanbul, Turkey.

The Prognostic Importance of Comorbidity for Mortality in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease

Role of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Hossam Kandil,, MD. Professor of Cardiology Cairo University

Long-term outcomes of PCI vs. CABG for ostial/midshaft lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery

International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences STUDY OF SERUM URIC ACID LEVELS IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION ABSTRACT

Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Without On-site Cardiac Surgery

A Polymer-Free Dual Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Trial Versus Polymer-Based DES.

Echocardiography analysis in renal transplant recipients

APPENDIX F: CASE REPORT FORM

Supplementary Material to Mayer et al. A comparative cohort study on personalised

( 1) Framingham Heart

The Framingham Risk Score (FRS) is widely recommended

Cardiology Department Coimbra Hospital and Medical School Portugal

Lucia Cea Soriano 1, Saga Johansson 2, Bergur Stefansson 2 and Luis A García Rodríguez 1*

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft in Acute Coronary Syndrome patients with Renal Dysfunction

Olive registry: 3-years outcome of BTK intervention in Japan. Osamu Iida, MD Kansai Rosai Hospital Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan

Low ALT Levels Independently Associated with 22-Year All-Cause Mortality Among Coronary Heart Disease Patients

Belinda Green, Cardiologist, SDHB, 2016

Autonomic nervous system, inflammation and preclinical carotid atherosclerosis in depressed subjects with coronary risk factors

Supplemental Table 1. Standardized Serum Creatinine Measurements. Supplemental Table 3. Sensitivity Analyses with Additional Mortality Outcomes.

The association between serum uric acid level and coronary artery disease

This event does not qualify for continuing medical education (CME), continuing nursing education (CNE), or continuing education (CE) credit

2010 Korean Society of Cardiology Spring Scientific Session Korea Japan Joint Symposium. Seoul National University Hospital Cardiovascular Center

Heart Failure and COPD: Common Partners, Common Problems. Nat Hawkins Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content

Cardiovascular Diseases in CKD

Research Article. Serum high sensitivity C-reactive protein, creatine kinase-mb, lipid profile and uric acid levels in acute myocardial infarction

Balancing Efficacy and Safety of P2Y12 Inhibitors for ACS Patients

Clinical Features and Subtypes of Ischemic Stroke Associated with Peripheral Arterial Disease

New insights in stent thrombosis: Platelet function monitoring. Franz-Josef Neumann Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen

Transcription:

DOI: 10.1111/eci.12039 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Uric acid and prognosis in angiography-proven coronary artery disease Gjin Ndrepepa *, Siegmund Braun *, Lamin King *, Massimiliano Fusaro *, Tomohisa Tada *, Salvatore Cassese *, Martin Hadamitzky *, Hans-Ullrich Haase, Albert Sch omig *, and Adnan Kastrati * * Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universit at, Munich, Germany, and I. Medizinische Klinik rechts der Isar, Technische Universit at, Munich, Germany ABSTRACT Background The optimal uric acid (UA) level associated with the lowest mortality and the strength of association between UA and mortality in various subgroups of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are unknown. Materials and methods This study included 13 273 patients with angiographic confirmation of CAD and UA measurements available. The primary outcome analysis was 1-year mortality. Results Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the best cut-off of UA for mortality prediction was 711 mg/dl. Using this cut-off, patients were divided into two groups: the group with UA 711 mg/dl (n = 9075) and the group with UA > 711 mg/dl (n = 4198). Cardiac mortality was 63% (256 deaths) in patients with UA > 711 mg/dl and 23% (201 deaths) in patients with UA 711 mg/dl [hazard ratio (HR) = 282, 95% confidence interval (CI) 236 336; P < 0001]. After adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, UA remained an independent correlate of cardiac mortality (HR = 120, 95% CI 108 134; P = 0001, for each standard deviation increase in the logarithmic scale of UA). The relationship between cardiac or allcause mortality and UA showed a J-shaped pattern with lowest mortality in patients with UA between 517 and 676 mg/dl. UA predicted mortality across all subgroups of patients, with strongest association in women and patients without arterial hypertension. Conclusions UA predicted an increased risk of cardiac mortality across all subgroups of patients with CAD. The association between UA and cardiac or all-cause mortality had a J-shaped pattern with lowest risk of death in patients with UA levels between 517 and < 676 mg/dl. Keywords Coronary artery disease, mortality, uric acid. Eur J Clin Invest 2013; 43 (3): 256 266 Introduction Uric acid (UA) an end product of purine metabolism has been implicated in the genesis of cardiovascular disease since 1879 [1], and more than 60 years ago, it was included in the protocols of Framingham study to be investigated as a potential risk factor for cardiovascular disease [2]. However, the nature of the relationship between UA and cardiovascular disease remains a subject of debate. Difficulties in determining whether UA should be considered a cardiovascular risk factor may be explained by its frequent association with other cardiovascular risk factors [3] for which UA is considered as a risk marker or epiphenomenon or even an adaptive change to protect from atherosclerosis due to its antioxidant properties [4] and the controversial and conflicting findings from epidemiological studies [3,5,6]. Apart from disputable causality, other aspects of the association between UA and cardiovascular disease remain poorly understood. Although a threshold effect in the association between UA and mortality has been described [7,8], the best cut-offs of UA for prediction of mortality remain unknown. A J-shaped association pattern between UA level and mortality (with an increase in mortality for lower and higher UA levels) has been described in population-based studies [9] and in various disease states [10 12]. However, the pattern of association between UA and mortality and the most optimal UA levels associated with lowest mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remain unknown, even though a stronger association between UA and mortality in patients with a CAD history has been reported [13,14]. Moreover, conflicting 256 ª 2012 The Authors. European Journal of Clinical Investigation ª 2012 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation

URIC ACID AND PROGNOSIS IN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE results have been reported regarding the association between UA and mortality in subgroups according to sex [5,15], diabetes [16,17] and kidney disease [18]. Despite data suggesting that elevated UA levels cause endothelial dysfunction [19] and may promote atherosclerosis and vascular thrombosis [20,21], evidence regarding the association between UA and myocardial infarction remains controversial [21,22]. We undertook this study in a large series of patients with CAD with a double objective: first, to assess the pattern of association between UA level and cardiac or all-cause mortality and find the most optimal UA levels associated with lowest mortality in patients with CAD; and second, to assess the strength of association between UA and mortality in various subgroups of patients with CAD. Methods Patients Between March 2000 and December 2009, 14 713 consecutive patients with CAD underwent diagnostic angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the Deutsches Herzzentrum in Munich. Those eligible for the study were patients with the clinical diagnosis of stable CAD or acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in whom the presence of significant CAD was confirmed by coronary angiography. Patients with no UA measurements (832 patients), acute infections (130 patients), renal disease (serum creatinine level 2 mg/dl; 312 patients) and known malignancies with life expectancy < 1 year (166 patients) were excluded. Thus, the present study included 13 273 patients with angiographic confirmation of significant CAD and UA measurements available. Of these, 8149 patients had stable CAD, and 5124 patients had ACS (unstable angina in 2163 patients, acute non-st-segment elevation myocardial infarction in 1332 patients and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in 1629 patients). Detailed inclusion/exclusion of the patients and the diagnostic criteria of CAD are provided in prior publications from our group [8,23]. Patients gave written informed consent before recruitment in the study. The study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional ethics committee. Reporting of the study conforms to STROBE along with references to STROBE and the broader EQUATOR guidelines [24]. Angiographic evaluation and definitions Digital angiograms were analysed offline with an automated edge-detection system (CMS; Medis Medical Imaging Systems, Nuenen, The Netherlands) in the core angiographic laboratory. Significant CAD was diagnosed in the presence of coronary stenoses 50% lumen obstruction in, at least, one of the three major coronary arteries. The complexity of lesions was defined according to the modified American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association grading system [25]. Class B2 and C lesions were considered complex. Left ventricular ejection fraction was calculated with area length method using left ventricular angiograms [26]. Arterial hypertension was considered to be present when a patient was receiving active treatment with antihypertensive drugs or if, on two separate occasions, the systolic blood pressure was 140 mmhg or greater or the diastolic blood pressure 90 mmhg or greater. Hypercholesterolaemia was defined as a documented total cholesterol value 220 mg/dl or prior or ongoing treatment with a lipid-lowering agent. Smokers were defined as those currently smoking any tobacco. The requirements for a diagnosis of diabetes were as follows: active treatment with insulin or an oral hypoglycaemic agent on admission; documentation of an abnormal fasting blood glucose (> 125 mg/dl); blood glucose > 200 mg/dl at any time; or abnormal glucose tolerance test based on the World Health Organization criteria. Patients weight and height were measured, and body mass index was calculated. The glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the Cockcroft Gault formula [27]. Stent implantation and periprocedural care were performed according to standard criteria. Antiplatelet therapy consisted of clopidogrel (300 or 600 mg as a loading dose followed by 75 mg/day for at least 4 weeks) and aspirin (200 mg/day administered orally and continued indefinitely). Outcome definition and follow-up The primary outcome analyses were 1-year cardiac and allcause mortality. Secondary outcomes included vascular events such as nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke. The followup protocol after discharge consisted of a phone interview at 1 month, a visit at 6 months and a phone interview at 12 months. The diagnosis of myocardial infarction was based on the development of new abnormal Q waves in 2 contiguous precordial or 2 adjacent limb leads, or an elevation of creatine kinase myocardial band (CK-MB) > 2 times (> 3 times for the 48 h after a PCI procedure) the upper limit of normal. Stroke required confirmation by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the head. Information about death was obtained from hospital records, death certificates or phone contact with relatives of the patient or referring physician(s). Cardiac death was defined according to Academic Research Consortium criteria and included any death due to proximate cardiac cause (e.g., myocardial infarction, low-output failure, faetal arrhythmia), unwitnessed death and death of unknown cause, and all procedure-related deaths, including those related to concomitant treatment [28]. Patients reporting cardiac complaints during follow-up underwent a complete clinical, electrocardiographic and laboratory evaluation. Collection of baseline characteristics of the patients, follow-up European Journal of Clinical Investigation Vol 43 257

G. NDREPEPA ET AL. www.ejci-online.com information and adjudication of adverse events was performed by medical staff unaware of UA level. Biochemical measurements Detailed description of laboratory measurements has been previously shown [8,23]. Blood samples were obtained before angiography in all patients. Blood was collected into tubes containing lithium heparin as anticoagulant (S-Monovette 49 ml; Sarstedt, N umbrecht, Germany). The blood samples were immediately transported to the laboratory, centrifuged and analysed (median turn-around time 30 45 min, 98% of results within 90 min). The UA concentration in plasma was determined with an enzymatic colorimetric test on a Cobas Integra 800 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The measuring range in plasma is 020 25 mg/dl (119 1500 lm). Lower detection limit of the test is 020 mg/dl (119 lm). The reference range for men is 34 70 mg/dl (2023 4165 lm) and for women 24 57 mg/dl (1428 3392 lm). Plasma concentrations of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured using a fully automated latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay on a Cobas Integra (Roche Diagnostics). The CRP assay has an analytical sensitivity of 0085 mg/l and a measuring range up to 160 mg/l. The upper limit of the reference range in healthy adults is 5 mg/l. Creatinine was measured using a kinetic colorimetric assay based on the compensated Jaffe method. Laboratory personnel were unaware of clinical, angiographic or follow-up data of the patients. Statistical analysis Data are presented as median (interquartile range), counts or proportions (%). One-sample Kolmogorov Smirnov test was used to assess the data distribution. Continuous data with skewed distribution (shown as medians with interquartile range) were compared with the Kruskal Wallis rank sum test. Categorical data were compared with chi-square test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to assess the best UA cut-off value regarding the prediction of cardiac mortality whilst maximizing sensitivity and specificity through minimizing the square root of (1 sensitivity) 2 + (1 specificity) 2. Survival analysis was performed by applying the Kaplan Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association between UA and cardiac or all-cause mortality whilst adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors and other relevant clinical variables. The following variables were entered into the model: age, sex, body mass index, diabetes, arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, smoking status, previous myocardial infarction, previous coronary artery bypass surgery, clinical presentation (stable CAD vs. ACS), glomerular filtration rate, CRP, left ventricular ejection fraction, multivessel disease and UA. UA was entered into the model as a continuous variable after logarithmic transformation. Area under the ROC curve showing the performance of UA to predict cardiac mortality was calculated after covariate adjustment. The same variables as for the Cox model were entered into the model. The discriminatory power of the model regarding mortality was assessed by calculating the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) according to Pencina et al. [29] Differences in the association between UA and mortality across various subgroups of patients were investigated by performing interaction testing. All analyses were performed using S-plus statistical package (S-PLUS; Insightful Corp, Seattle, WA, USA). A two-tailed P < 005 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Results Characteristics of patients The ROC curve analysis of UA predicted 1-year cardiac mortality with an unadjusted area under the curve of 0650 with 95% confidence interval (CI) between 0616 and 0675 (P < 0001; Fig. 1). The best cut-off value of UA regarding mortality prediction was 711 mg/dl. Using this cut-off, patients were divided into two groups: group with UA level 711 mg/dl (n = 9075 patients) and group with UA level True-Positive Rate (Sensitivity) 1 0 Unadjusted AUC = 0 650, 95% CI [0 616 0 675]; P<0 001 0 8 0 6 0 4 0 2 0 0 Uric acid 7 11 mg/dl Uric acid level = 7 11 mg/dl Sensitivity = 56% Specificity = 69% 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 1 0 False-Positive Rate (1-Specificity) Figure 1 Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showing the accuracy of uric acid to predict cardiac mortality. Adjusted area under the ROC curve was 0666, 95% confidence interval 0634 0698; P < 0001. 258 ª 2012 The Authors. European Journal of Clinical Investigation ª 2012 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation

URIC ACID AND PROGNOSIS IN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE Table 1 Baseline characteristics Characteristic Uric acid (UA) 711 mg/dl (n = 9075) > 711 mg/dl (n = 4198) P value Age (years) 670 [592; 743] 684 [604;756] < 0001 Females 2389 (263) 714 (170) < 0001 Diabetes 2409 (265) 1296 (309) < 0001 Insulin requiring 751 (83) 436 (104) < 0001 Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) 265 [243; 291] 278 [256; 306] < 0001 Arterial hypertension 6269 (691) 2844 (677) 0123 Current smoking 1450 (160) 642 (153) 0314 Hypercholesterolaemia 6387 (704) 2904 (692) 0159 Previous myocardial infarction Previous coronary artery bypass surgery 2751 (303) 1458 (347) < 0001 1297 (143) 698 (166) < 0001 Clinical presentation Stable coronary artery disease 5541 (611) 2608 (621) 0011 Acute coronary syndrome 3534 (389) 1590 (379) High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (mg/l) 21 [09; 60] 32 [13; 86] < 0001 Creatinine (mg/dl) 09 [08; 11] 11 [09; 13] < 0001 Glomerular filtration rate (ml/min) 828 [641; 1039] 721 [524; 958] < 0001 UA (mg/dl) 58 [50; 64] 81 [76; 90] < 0001 No. of coronary arteries narrowed 1 1690 (186) 625 (149) < 0001 2 2489 (274) 1031 (246) 3 4896 (540) 2542 (605) Multivessel disease 7385 (814) 3573 (851) < 0001 Complex lesions 6869 (757) 3191 (760) 0688 Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) 580 [490; 630] 540 [430; 610] < 0001 Vessel treated Left main coronary artery 390 (43) 197 (47) < 0001 Left descendent coronary artery 3640 (401) 1563 (372) Left circumflex coronary artery 2189 (241) 1010 (241) Right coronary artery 2518 (278) 1197 (285) Bypass graft 338 (37) 231 (55) Type of intervention Coronary stenting 8221 (906) 3786 (902) 0461 European Journal of Clinical Investigation Vol 43 259

G. NDREPEPA ET AL. www.ejci-online.com Table 1 Continued Characteristic Uric acid (UA) 711 mg/dl (n = 9075) > 711 mg/dl (n = 4198) P value Balloon angioplasty 854 (94) 412 (98) Drug-eluting stents 6239 (759)* 2822 (745)* 0109 Data are number of patients (%) or median [25th; 75th percentiles]. Data on body mass index, glomerular filtration rate, C-reactive protein and left ventricular ejection fraction were available in 997% (n = 13 237), 997% (n = 13 238), 992% (n = 13 170) and 879% (n = 11 664) of the patients, respectively. The remaining data are complete. *Refers to patients with implanted stents only. > 711 mg/dl (n = 4198 patients). With the exception of the proportions of patients with arterial hypertension, current smoking, hypercholesterolaemia or complex lesions and the type of therapy, all other characteristics differed significantly amongst patients in both groups (Table 1). Clinical outcome Overall, there were 646 deaths (49%) within the first year following PCI. Of these, 457 deaths (34% of patients or 707% of deaths) were of cardiac origin. Deaths of cardiac origin occurred in 256 patients with UA level > 711 mg/dl and in 201 patients with UA level 711 mg/dl [Kaplan Meier estimates of mortality 63% and 23%, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) = 282, 95% CI 236 336; P < 0001; Fig. 2a]. Allcause deaths occurred in 345 patients with UA level > 711 mg/dl and in 301 patients with UA level 711 mg/ dl (Kaplan Meier estimates of mortality 84% and 36%, respectively; HR = 254, 95% CI 219 295; P < 0001; Fig. 2b). Nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 139 patients with UA level > 711 mg/dl and in 281 patients with UA level 711 mg/dl (Kaplan Meier estimates, 34% and 31%, respectively; HR = 108, 95% CI 088 132; P = 0449). Stroke occurred in 35 patients with UA level > 711 mg/dl and in 59 patients with UA level 711 mg/dl (Kaplan Meier estimates, 09% and 07%, respectively; HR = 130, 95% CI 086 198; P = 0806). Distribution pattern of mortality according to UA level Cardiac and all-cause mortality was assessed according to deciles of UA concentration (Table 2 and Fig. 3). For UA levels between 517 and < 676 mg/dl (3rd to 6th deciles), cardiac and all-cause mortality was lowest [19% (100 deaths) and 30% (160 deaths), respectively]. For patients with UA levels 517 mg/dl (the first 2 deciles), the risk of cardiac (76 deaths, 29%) or all-cause (108 deaths, 41%) mortality was significantly higher than for patients in the 3rd to 6th deciles [odds ratio (OR) = 153, 95% CI 113 208; P = 0005 for cardiac mortality and OR = 136 (106 175); P = 0013 for (a) (b) Probability of mortality (%) Probability of mortality (%) 10 10 8 6 4 2 0 Patients at Risk UA>7 11 mg/dl 8 6 4 2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Patients at Risk Months UA>7 11 mg/dl 4198 3965 3883 3843 3757 3701 3648 UA 7 11 mg/dl 9075 8781 8701 8643 8475 8409 8306 UA 7 11 mg/dl P<0 001 P<0 001 UA>7 11 mg/dl UA 7 11 mg/dl UA>7 11 mg/dl UA 7 11 mg/dl 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Months 4198 3965 3883 3843 3757 3701 3648 9075 8781 8701 8643 8475 8409 8306 Figure 2 Kaplan Meier curves of cardiac (a) and all-cause (b) mortality according to UA level > or 711 mg/dl. UA, uric acid. all-cause mortality]. For patients with UA levels > 676 mg/dl (7th to 10th deciles), the risk of cardiac (281 deaths, 53%) or all-cause (378 deaths, 71%) was significantly higher than for patients in the 3rd to 6th deciles [OR = 290 (231 366); 260 ª 2012 The Authors. European Journal of Clinical Investigation ª 2012 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation

URIC ACID AND PROGNOSIS IN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE Table 2 Cardiac and all-cause mortality according to uric acid (UA) deciles Deciles of UA UA level (mg/dl) Number of patients Mortality (number of patients; %) Cardiac All-cause 1st 130 to < 452 1324 30 (227) 48 (363) 2nd 452 to < 517 1328 46 (446) 60 (452) 3rd 517 to < 560 1264 15 (119) 31 (245) 4th 560 to < 600 1375 27 (196) 40 (291) 5th 600 to < 637 1321 35 (265) 51 (386) 6th 637 to < 676 1348 23 (171) 38 (282) 7th 676 to < 720 1244 29 (233) 38 (305) 8th 720 to < 780 1375 50 (364) 70 (509) 9th 780 to < 876 1364 70 (513) 88 (645) 10th 876 2190 1330 132 (992) 182 (1368) Data are range(s) or number of patients (%). Mortality(%) 14 0 12 0 10 0 8 0 6 0 4 0 2 0 0 Cardiac mortality All-cause mortality 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Uric acid Deciles Figure 3 Cardiac and all-cause mortality according to deciles of uric acid. P < 0001 for cardiac mortality and OR = 180 (145 224); P < 0001 for all-cause mortality]. Thus, the relationship between mortality and UA level in patients with CAD showed a J-shaped pattern (Fig. 3). UA and adjusted risk of mortality The Cox proportional hazards model was used to test the association between UA level and mortality whilst adjusting for potential confounders (see Methods for variables entered into the model). Results of multivariable analysis are shown in Table 3. After adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors and relevant clinical variables, including renal function (glomerular filtration rate) and inflammation status (CRP), UA remained an independent correlate of cardiac mortality (adjusted HR = 120, 95% CI 108 134; P = 0001) and all-cause mortality (adjusted HR = 119, 95% CI 108 130; P < 0001) for each standard deviation increase in the logarithmic scale of UA. Adjusted risk of mortality was also calculated for each 1 mg/ dl increase in the UA level. For each 1 mg/dl increase in the UA level, the adjusted risk of cardiac and all-cause mortality was increased by 10% (adjusted HR = 110, 95% CI 104 116; P < 0001) and 11% (adjusted HR = 111, 95% CI 106 116; P < 0001), respectively. The inclusion of UA in the multivariable model was associated with a trend for an improvement of the discriminatory power of the model regarding prediction of cardiac mortality (absolute IDI = 0004, relative IDI = 25%; P = 0074) and a significant improvement of discriminatory power of the model regarding all-cause mortality (absolute IDI = 0005, relative IDI = 30%; P = 0022). UA and mortality in various subgroups of patients The association between UA and cardiac or all-cause mortality was assessed in various subgroups of patients. For this analysis, patient subgroups were obtained by dividing patients according to age (cut-off, 65 years), sex, diabetes, arterial hypertension, glomerular filtration rate (cut-off, 60 ml/min), body mass index (cut-off, 30 kg/m 2 ), left ventricular ejection fraction (cut-off, 50%) and CRP (cut-off, 5 mg/l). This analysis showed that UA predicted an increased risk of cardiac and all-cause mortality across all subgroups. An interaction was observed between UA and sex demonstrating a stronger European Journal of Clinical Investigation Vol 43 261

G. NDREPEPA ET AL. www.ejci-online.com Table 3 Results of multivariable Cox proportional hazards model regarding cardiac and all-cause mortality Characteristic Uric acid (for each SD increase in the natural logarithm) Cardiac mortality All-cause mortality HR [95% CI] P value HR [95% CI] P value 120 [108 134] 0001 119 [108 130] < 0001 Age (for 10-year increase) 112 [096 129] 0147 120 [105 131] 0006 Female sex 114 [089 147] 0298 114 [093 142] 0212 Body mass index (for 5 kg/m 2 increase) 111 [096 129] 0168 106 [093 120] 0412 Diabetes 160 [128 201] < 0001 161 [133 194] < 0001 Arterial hypertension 055 [044 070] < 0001 063 [052 077] < 0001 Hypercholesterolaemia 079 [063 100] 0050 077 [063 094] 0009 Current smoking 093 [066 131] 0681 105 [079 140] 0724 Previous myocardial infarction 083 [065 106] 0144 089 [073 110] 0274 Previous coronary artery bypass surgery 075 [053 105] 0100 089 [068 116] 0379 Clinical presentation (ACS vs. stable CAD) 225 [175 290] < 0001 200 [163 246] < 0001 Glomerular filtration rate (for 30 ml/min decrease) 204 [166 250] < 0001 200 [166 238] < 0001 C-reactive protein (for 5 mg/l increase) 102 [101 103] < 0001 102 [101 103] < 0001 Left ventricular ejection fraction (for 10% decrease) 161 [148 175] < 0001 152 [141 162] < 0001 Multivessel disease (vs. single-vessel disease) 187 [127 277] 0002 171 [124 227] 0001 ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CAD, coronary artery disease; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation; HR, hazard ratio. association with mortality in women than in men (P for interaction = 0059 for cardiac mortality and P for interaction = 0019 for all-cause mortality) and between UA and arterial hypertension demonstrating a stronger association between UA and mortality in patients without arterial hypertension than in patients with arterial hypertension (P for interaction = 0050 for cardiac mortality and P for interaction = 0064 for all-cause mortality). The results of subgroup analyses are shown in Figs 4 and 5. Discussion In this study, we investigated the pattern of association between UA and mortality (cardiac and all-cause) in a large series of patients with CAD and the strength of this association in various subgroups of patients. The main findings of the study can be summarized as follows: (i) UA predicted an increased risk of cardiac and all-cause mortality independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, left ventricular function, CRP and renal function across the whole spectrum of patients with CAD. (ii) The association between UA and cardiac or all-cause mortality followed a J-shaped pattern with a significant increase in the risk of death in patients with the lowest and highest UA levels. UA levels between 517 and < 676 mg/ dl were associated with the lowest risk of mortality (both cardiac and all-cause). There was a significant increase in the risk of death for UA levels either < 517 mg/dl or higher than 676 mg/dl. (iii) UA predicted an increased risk of cardiac and all-cause mortality across all subsets of patients defined by age (younger or older than 65 years), sex, diabetes, arterial hypertension, obesity, CAD presentation, renal function, left ventricular systolic function or CRP level. However, the strongest association between UA and mortality was observed in women and patients without arterial hypertension. Prior studies in patients with known CAD have shown that UA is an independent correlate of mortality [30,31]. Of note, it has also been suggested that the presence of CAD strengthens the association between UA and mortality [13,14]. The present study is the largest one to provide support for an independent association between UA and both cardiac and all-cause mortality in patients with known CAD. We also 262 ª 2012 The Authors. European Journal of Clinical Investigation ª 2012 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation

URIC ACID AND PROGNOSIS IN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE Cardiac mortality No. of Events/Total (%) Uric acid 7 11 mg/dl >7 11 mg/dl All Patients Age >65 years 201/9075 (2 3) 161/5203 (3 2) 256/4198 (6 3) 212/2114 (8 3) 65 years 40/3872 (1 1) 44/1584 (2 8) Sex Women 69/2389 (3 0) 76/714 (11 0) Men 132/6686 (2 0) 180/3484 (5 3) Diabetes 85/2409 (3 7) 105/1296 (8 4) No Arterial hypertension 116/6666 (1 7) 151/2902 (5 3) 104/6269 (1 7) 107/2844 (3 8) No 97/2806 (3 5) 149/1354 (11 3) Clinical presentation ACS 143/3534 (4 1) 193/1590 (12 5) Stable CAD 58/5541 (1 1) 63/2608 (2 5) GFR<60 ml/min 113/1816 (6 4) 176/1446 (12 6) No 86/7239 (1 2) 75/2737 (2 8) BMI>30 kg/m 2 28/1730 (1 7) 47/1214 (4 0) No 171/7325 (2 4) 203/2968 (7 0) LVEF 50% 106/2132 (5 1) 144/1330 (11 2) >50% 52/6016 (0 9) 37/2186 (1 7) CRP> 5mg/L 121/2594 (4 8) 164/1591 (10 7) No 78/6413 (1 2) 90/2572 (4 6) Hazard ratio (95% Confidence Intervals) 2 82 [2 36-3 36] 2 70 [2 22-3 29] 2 71 [1 80-4 10] 3 88 [2 87-5 26] 2 66 [2 14-3 31] 2 37 [1 80-3 13] 3 04 [2 42-3 83] 2 30 [1 77-3 00] 3 31 [2 60-4 21] 3 15 [2 57-3 87] 2 32 [1 64-3 28] 2 03 [1 61-2 58] 2 32 [1 72-3 14] 2 43 [1 54-3 82] 3 01 [2 48-3 65] 2 25 [1 76-2 87] 1 97 [1 30-2 98] 2 30 [1 82-2 88] 2 90 [2 17-3 88] P int 0 978 0 059 0 190 0 050 0 134 0 506 0 409 0 587 0 239 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 Hazard ratio Figure 4 Cardiac mortality in various subgroups of patients with CAD. ACS, acute coronary syndrome; BMI, body mass index; CAD, coronary artery disease; CRP, C-reactive protein; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; No., number; P int, P for interaction. showed that the association between UA and mortality has a J-shaped pattern with higher mortality rates for patients with high and low UA levels. Based on our analysis, 60% of patients with CAD had suboptimal UA levels (the first two deciles too low and the upper four deciles too high) in terms of association with mortality. The association between elevated levels of UA and mortality from cardiac disease has been the subject of intense research, and a host of putative mechanisms to explain it has been proposed and recently reviewed [32]. In brief, an association with a more adverse cardiovascular risk profile and the possibility that UA per se may promote atherosclerosis or vascular events leading to cardiovascular deaths have been proposed to explain increased risk of death associated with elevated UA levels. Evidence available suggests that UA may have atherogenic actions. Thus, it has been suggested that UA causes endothelial dysfunction [19,33], proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells [34], and it promotes inflammation in vascular tissue [33], acts as pro-oxidant in atherosclerotic environment [35], and enhances lipid peroxidation [36]. UA and xanthine oxidase have been identified in atherosclerotic plaques and involved in the aetiology of atherosclerosis [37]. However, the Hill s criteria of causality for UA as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease [38] are only partially fulfilled at best [39]. Reasons for an association between low UA levels and mortality are unknown. In a recent study of patients on hemodialysis by Lee et al. [40], an UA level < 52 mg/dl (very close to our cut-off point of 517 mg/dl) was associated with a > 2-fold increased risk of death in the first year of dialysis. Low UA levels were also associated with more comorbid conditions and markers of protein energy wasting, suggesting a higher oxidative stress due to reduced antioxidant combat mechanisms conferred by low UA level. These factors were proposed as putative mechanisms for increased risk of death in these patients [40]. Other studies have implicated malnutrition as a causative factor for low UA level, which also affects mortality [41]. Reduced UA levels have been linked to several neurological diseases such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson s disease, Alzheimer s disease and optic neuritis [42]. Although the risk conferred by these diseases in our patients remains unaccounted for, any substantial contribution in mortality by these diseases would seem unlikely. Moreover, because patients with impaired renal function (serum creatinine level 2 mg/dl) were excluded from the study, mechanisms that may be operative in a patient population with renal failure and dialysis may not be applicable in explaining the increased risk of death with low UA levels in our patients with CAD. European Journal of Clinical Investigation Vol 43 263

G. NDREPEPA ET AL. www.ejci-online.com All-cause mortality No. of Events/Total (%) Uric acid All Patients 7 11 mg/dl 301/9075 (3 6) >7 11 mg/dl 345/4198 (8 4) Age >65 years 247/5203 (4 8) 283/2114 (10 0) 65 years 54/3872 (1 4) 62/1584 (4 0) Sex Women 102/2389 (4 4) 102/714 (14 6) Men 199/6686 (3 0) 243/3484 (7 1) Diabetes 114/2409 (4 9) 150/1296 (12 0) No 187/6666 (2 8) 195/2902 (6 8) Arterial hypertension 167/6269 (2 7) 164/2844 (5 9) No 134/2806 (4 8) 181/1354 (13 6) Clinical presentation ACS 209/3534 (6 0) 241/1590 (15 4) Stable CAD 92/5541 (1 7) 104/2608 (4 1) GFR<60 ml/min 171/1816 (9 6) 232/1446 (16 4) No 125/7239 (1 7) 105/2737 (4 0) BMI>30 kg/m 2 36/1730 (2 1) 68/1214 (5 8) No 260/7325 (3 6) 268/2968 (9 2) LVEF 50% 148/2132 (7 1) 183/1330 (14 1) >50% 84/6016 (1 4) 62/2186 (2 9) CRP> 5mg/L 180/2594 (7 1) 224/1591 (14 5) No 119/6413 (1 9) 118/2572 (4 7) Hazard ratio (95% Confidence Intervals) 2 54 [2 19-2 95] 2 36 [2 00-2 78] 2 84 [2 00-4 03] 3 55 [2 74-4 59] 2 39 [1 99-2 87] 2 54 [2 00-3 21] 2 44 [2 01-2 97] 2 20 [1 78-2 72] 2 92 [2 01-3 61] 2 71 [2 27-3 23] 2 42 [1 84-3 17] 1 78 [1 46-2 16] 2 24 [1 74-2 88] 2 74 [1 86-4 03] 2 62 [2 22-3 08] 2 05 [1 66-2 54] 2 04 [1 48-2 82] 2 12 [1 75-2 57] 2 50 [1 95-3 19] P int 0 364 0 019 0 821 0 064 0 463 0 169 0 672 0 968 0 327 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 Hazard ratio Figure 5 All-cause mortality in various subgroups of patients with CAD. ACS, acute coronary syndrome; BMI, body mass index; CAD, coronary artery disease; CRP, C-reactive protein; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; No., number; P int, P for interaction. Subgroup analyses performed in the setting of present study showed that UA level predicts an increased risk of cardiac and all-cause mortality across all subsets of patients with CAD. We believe that these findings are novel and important in the light of existing controversy regarding the association between UA and mortality in various diseases [16 18]. Although, UA level predicted mortality across all subgroups, differences in the strength of association were observed. Specifically, a stronger association of UA with mortality was observed in women and patients without arterial hypertension. Whilst the association between UA and mortality was observed in both sexes, the finding of a stronger association in women in our study is in line with prior studies showing a stronger association of UA with mortality in women than in men [15]. A recent meta-analysis by Kim et al. [43] showed that association between hyperuricemia and CAD incidence and mortality was significant in women but not in men. Moreover, in recent studies by Strasak et al. [44,45], a higher mortality due to CAD was observed only in women. To our knowledge, finding of a stronger association between UA and cardiac mortality in patients without arterial hypertension is novel. In the Rotterdam study, the association between UA and stroke was weakened by the presence of arterial hypertension [21]. The magnitude of differences in the risk estimates (HRs) in subgroup analyses (Figs 4 and 5) provides a signal for a stronger association between UA and mortality in the absence of cardiovascular risk factors. Specifically, trends for a stronger association of UA with cardiac mortality were observed in patients without arterial hypertension, diabetes, obesity and in those with low CRP. Although, this finding may be a signal for causality in the relationship between UA and cardiovascular disease, which may be more evident in the absence of masking effects of risk factors, further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. The present study may have implications. In particular, this study may strengthen the need for interventional studies with UA-lowering therapies to maintain UA levels in the range associated with the lowest mortality. Although current guidelines recommend an UA level 6 mg/dl [46], these target concentrations are reached in < 50% of the patients [47]. Moreover, allopurinol a xanthine oxidase inhibitor has been shown recently to significantly improve endothelial function and abolish vascular oxidative stress [48], has a clinically relevant antiischaemic effect and has been well tolerated in patients with angina [49]. In analogy with homocysteine-lowering therapy, 264 ª 2012 The Authors. European Journal of Clinical Investigation ª 2012 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation

URIC ACID AND PROGNOSIS IN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE interventional studies with UA-lowering agents, apart from exploring clinical benefits of these agents, may provide valuable additional information regarding causality in the UA cardiovascular disease relationship. We recognize several limitations of the present study. First, a follow-up longer than 1 year would be desirable. However, the curves of mortality were diverging, and the difference in mortality rates expanding throughout the first year suggests that even greater differences in mortality would be expected in the years to come. Second, when analysing the results of subgroup analyses, the impact of errors introduced by multiple testing should be considered. However, all subgroup comparisons of UA mortality association had P < 0001, which almost excludes the possibility of chance findings. Although, in general, subgroup analyses suffer from limited numbers of subjects/patients due to division into subgroups, large number of patients in the present study allowed us to perform subgroup analyses with large numbers of patients per subgroup. Third, the study has an observational design and is based on a single UA measurement. Thus, eventual changes in UA level during the follow-up remain unaccounted for. Finally, patients with advanced renal disease and those with malignancies with life expectancy < 1 year are not included in this analysis. In conclusion, UA level predicted an increased risk of cardiac and all-cause mortality across all subsets of patients with CAD with the strongest association observed in women and patients without arterial hypertension. The association between UA level and cardiac and all-cause mortality followed a J-shaped pattern with a significant increase in mortality for UA levels < 517 and > 676 mg/dl. Specifically designed interventional studies are needed to confirm these findings. Author contribution Drs Ndrepepa and Kastrati involved in the conception and design of the study. Drs Ndrepepa, Braun, King, Fusaro, Tada, Cassese, Hadamitzky and Haase involved in the acquisition of the data, analysed and interpreted the data. Drs Ndrepepa, Kastrati and Sch omig involved in the writing and critiquing of drafts of the manuscript. Drs Ndrepepa, Braun, King, Fusaro, Tada, Cassese, Hadamitzky, Haase, Sch omig and Kastrati approved the final manuscript for submission. Conflicts of interest None. Sources of funding None. Address Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universit at, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636 M unchen, Germany (G. Ndrepepa, S. Braun, L. King, M. Fusaro, T. Tada, S. Cassese, M. Hadamitzky, A. Sch omig, A. Kastrati); 1. Medizinische Klinik rechts der Isar, Technische Universit at, Munich, Germany (H.-U. Haase, A. Sch omig). Correspondence to: Gjin Ndrepepa, MD, Deutsches Herzzentrum, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636 M unchen, Germany. Tel.: +49 89 12181535; fax: +49 89 12184053; e-mail: ndrepepa@dhm. mhn.de Received 25 May 2012; accepted 29 November 2012 References 1 Mohamed FA. On Bright s disease, and its essential symptoms. Lancet 1879;1:399 401. 2 Dawber TR, Meadors GF, Moore FE Jr. Epidemiological approaches to heart disease: the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health Nations Health 1951;41:279 81. 3 Culleton BF, Larson MG, Kannel WB, Levy D. Serum uric acid and risk for cardiovascular disease and death: the Framingham Heart Study. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:7 13. 4 Davies KJ, Sevanian A, Muakkassah-Kelly SF, Hochstein P. Uric acid-iron ion complexes. A new aspect of the antioxidant functions of uric acid. Biochem J 1986;235:747 54. 5 Fang J, Alderman MH. Serum uric acid and cardiovascular mortality the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study, 1971 1992. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA 2000;283:2404 10. 6 Niskanen LK, Laaksonen DE, Nyyssonen K, Alfthan G, Lakka HM, Lakka TA et al. Uric acid level as a risk factor for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in middle-aged men: a prospective cohort study. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1546 51. 7 Kojima S, Sakamoto T, Ishihara M, Kimura K, Miyazaki S, Yamagishi M et al. Prognostic usefulness of serum uric acid after acute myocardial infarction (the Japanese Acute Coronary Syndrome Study). Am J Cardiol 2005;96:489 95. 8 Ndrepepa G, Braun S, Haase HU, Schulz S, Ranftl S, Hadamitzky M et al. Prognostic value of uric acid in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol 2012;109:1260 5. 9 Bengtsson C, Lapidus L, Stendahl C, Waldenstrom J. Hyperuricaemia and risk of cardiovascular disease and overall death. A 12-year follow-up of participants in the population study of women in Gothenburg, Sweden. Acta Med Scand 1988;224:549 55. 10 Alderman MH, Cohen H, Madhavan S, Kivlighn S. Serum uric acid and cardiovascular events in successfully treated hypertensive patients. Hypertension 1999;34:144 50. 11 Lehto S, Niskanen L, Ronnemaa T, Laakso M. Serum uric acid is a strong predictor of stroke in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Stroke 1998;29:635 9. 12 Suliman ME, Johnson RJ, Garcia-Lopez E, Qureshi AR, Molinaei H, Carrero JJ et al. J-shaped mortality relationship for uric acid in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2006;48:761 71. 13 Torun M, Yardim S, Simsek B, Burgaz S. Serum uric acid levels in cardiovascular diseases. J Clin Pharm Ther 1998;23:25 9. 14 Ioachimescu AG, Brennan DM, Hoar BM, Hazen SL, Hoogwerf BJ. Serum uric acid is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a preventive cardiology information system (PreCIS) database cohort study. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:623 30. European Journal of Clinical Investigation Vol 43 265

G. NDREPEPA ET AL. www.ejci-online.com 15 Hoieggen A, Alderman MH, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, Devereux RB, De Faire U et al. The impact of serum uric acid on cardiovascular outcomes in the LIFE study. Kidney Int 2004;65:1041 9. 16 Zoppini G, Targher G, Negri C, Stoico V, Perrone F, Muggeo M et al. Elevated serum uric acid concentrations independently predict cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1716 20. 17 Panero F, Gruden G, Perotto M, Fornengo P, Barutta F, Greco E et al. Uric acid is not an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes: a population-based study. Atherosclerosis 2012;221:183 8. 18 Navaneethan SD, Beddhu S. Associations of serum uric acid with cardiovascular events and mortality in moderate chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24:1260 6. 19 Khosla UM, Zharikov S, Finch JL, Nakagawa T, Roncal C, Mu W et al. Hyperuricemia induces endothelial dysfunction. Kidney Int 2005;67:1739 42. 20 Suarna C, Dean RT, May J, Stocker R. Human atherosclerotic plaque contains both oxidized lipids and relatively large amounts of alpha-tocopherol and ascorbate. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1995;15:1616 24. 21 Bos MJ, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Witteman JC, Breteler MM. Uric acid is a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke: the Rotterdam study. Stroke 2006;37:1503 7. 22 Meisinger C, Koenig W, Baumert J, Doring A. Uric acid levels are associated with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality independent of systemic inflammation in men from the general population: the MONICA/KORA cohort study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2008;28:1186 92. 23 Ndrepepa G, Braun S, King L, Hadamitzky M, Haase HU, Birkmeier KA et al. Association of uric acid with mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Metabolism 2012;61:1780 6. 24 Simera I, Moher D, Hoey J, Schulz KF, Altman DG. A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research. Eur J Clin Invest 2010;40:35 53. 25 Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, DiSciascio G, Deligonul U, Topol EJ et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. Circulation 1990;82:1193 202. 26 Sandler H, Dodge HT. The use of single plane angiocardiograms for the calculation of left ventricular volume in man. Am Heart J 1968;75:325 34. 27 Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976;16:31 41. 28 Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 2007;115:2344 51. 29 Pencina MJ, D Agostino RB Sr, D Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 2008;27:157 72; discussion 207 12. 30 Bickel C, Rupprecht HJ, Blankenberg S, Rippin G, Hafner G, Daunhauer A et al. Serum uric acid as an independent predictor of mortality in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2002;89:12 7. 31 Madsen TE, Muhlestein JB, Carlquist JF, Horne BD, Bair TL, Jackson JD et al. Serum uric acid independently predicts mortality in patients with significant, angiographically defined coronary disease. Am J Nephrol 2005;25:45 9. 32 Feig DI, Kang DH, Johnson RJ. Uric acid and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1811 21. 33 Kanellis J, Kang DH. Uric acid as a mediator of endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and vascular disease. Semin Nephrol 2005;25:39 42. 34 Kang DH, Han L, Ouyang X, Kahn AM, Kanellis J, Li P et al. Uric acid causes vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation by entering cells via a functional urate transporter. Am J Nephrol 2005;25: 425 33. 35 Hayden MR, Tyagi SC. Uric acid: a new look at an old risk marker for cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes mellitus: the urate redox shuttle. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2004;1:10. 36 De Scheerder IK, van de Kraay AM, Lamers JM, Koster JF, de Jong JW, Serruys PW. Myocardial malondialdehyde and uric acid release after short-lasting coronary occlusions during coronary angioplasty: potential mechanisms for free radical generation. Am J Cardiol 1991;68:392 5. 37 Patetsios P, Song M, Shutze WP, Pappas C, Rodino W, Ramirez JA et al. Identification of uric acid and xanthine oxidase in atherosclerotic plaque. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:188 91, A6. 38 Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 1965;58:295 300. 39 Gaffo AL, Edwards NL, Saag KG. Gout. Hyperuricemia and cardiovascular disease: how strong is the evidence for a causal link? Arthritis Res Ther 2009;11:240. 40 Lee SM, Lee AL, Winters TJ, Tam E, Jaleel M, Stenvinkel P et al. Low serum uric acid level is a risk factor for death in incident hemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol 2009;29:79 85. 41 Hsu SP, Pai MF, Peng YS, Chiang CK, Ho TI, Hung KY. Serum uric acid levels show a J-shaped association with all-cause mortality in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19:457 62. 42 Kutzing MK, Firestein BL. Altered uric acid levels and disease states. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2008;324:1 7. 43 Kim SY, Guevara JP, Kim KM, Choi HK, Heitjan DF, Albert DA. Hyperuricemia and coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010;62:170 80. 44 Strasak AM, Kelleher CC, Brant LJ, Rapp K, Ruttmann E, Concin H et al. Serum uric acid is an independent predictor for all major forms of cardiovascular death in 28,613 elderly women: a prospective 21- year follow-up study. Int J Cardiol 2008;125:232 9. 45 Strasak A, Ruttmann E, Brant L, Kelleher C, Klenk J, Concin H et al. Serum uric acid and risk of cardiovascular mortality: a prospective long-term study of 83,683 Austrian men. Clin Chem 2008;54:273 84. 46 Zhang W, Doherty M, Pascual E, Bardin T, Barskova V, Conaghan P et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part I: diagnosis. Report of a task force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:1301 11. 47 Wei L, Mackenzie IS, Chen Y, Struthers AD, MacDonald TM. Impact of allopurinol use on urate concentration and cardiovascular outcome. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2011;71:600 7. 48 Rajendra NS, Ireland S, George J, Belch JJ, Lang CC, Struthers AD. Mechanistic insights into the therapeutic use of high-dose allopurinol in angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:820 8. 49 Noman A, Ang DS, Ogston S, Lang CC, Struthers AD. Effect of high-dose allopurinol on exercise in patients with chronic stable angina: a randomised, placebo controlled crossover trial. Lancet 2010;375:2161 7. 266 ª 2012 The Authors. European Journal of Clinical Investigation ª 2012 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation