Sternal resection and reconstruction for secondary malignancies

Similar documents
Chest Wall Tumors and Reconstruction: Lateral Chest Wall. Dr. Robert Kelly

Short and long-term results of sternectomy for sternal tumours

Advances in Breast Surgery. Catherine Campo, D.O. Breast Surgeon Meridian Health System April 17, 2015

Breast cancer reconstruction surgery (immediate and delayed) across Ontario: Patient indications and appropriate surgical options

Chest wall resection (CWR) for voluminous tumors or

Management of recurrent phyllodes with full thickness chest wall resection

Classification System

Sternal Resection and Reconstruction for Primary Malignant Tumors

Multidisciplinary management of retroperitoneal sarcomas

American Journal ofcancer Case Reports

Adam J. Hansen, MD UHC Thoracic Surgery

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

PRIMARY STUDIES EN BLOC VERSUS DEBULKING

EARLY AND LONG-TERM RESULTS OF PROSTHETIC CHEST WALL RECONSTRUCTION

Index. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 16 (2007) Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

NIPPLE SPARING PRE-PECTORAL BREAST RECONSTRUCTION

Clinical experience with titanium mesh in reconstruction of massive chest wall defects following oncological resection

National Center of Oncology - Yerevan, Armenia

THORACIC MALIGNANCIES

National Mastectomy & Breast Reconstruction Audit Datasheet - Mastectomy +/- Immediate Reconstruction

T3 NSCLC: Chest Wall, Diaphragm, Mediastinum

After primary tumor treatment, 30% of patients with malignant

Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy with Immediate Reconstruction: Added Benefits, Added Risks

Oncoplastic techniques in breast surgery for special therapeutic problems

How To Make a Good Mastectomy for Reconstruction Based on the Anatomy. Zhang Jin, Ph.D MD

Current Strategies in Breast Reconstruction

Breast Unit - University of Heidelberg - Heidelberg, Germany

HISTORY SURGERY FOR TUMORS WITH INVASION OF THE APEX 15/11/2018

CASE REPORT. Introduction. Case series reports. J Thorac Dis 2012;4(S1): DOI: /j.issn s003

PET IMAGING (POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPY) FACT SHEET

Resorbable Chest Wall Stabilization Plate. Chest Wall Reconstruction Technique. Innovative Solutions for Challenging Thoracic Procedures

Barlavento Medical Centre - Portimão, Portugal

NICE guideline Published: 10 February 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ng36

Complex Thoracoscopic Resections for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer

Clinical Study Metastasectomy of Pulmonary Metastases from Osteosarcoma: Prognostic Factors and Indication for Repeat Metastasectomy

POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (PET)

Mamma Centrum / Zelený Pruh - Prague, Czech Republic

Thoracoplasty for the Management of Postpneumonectomy Empyema

Breast Reconstruction: Current Strategies and Future Opportunities

ANNEX 1 OBJECTIVES. At the completion of the training period, the fellow should be able to:

Posterior Thoracic Corpectomies with Cage Reconstruction for Metastatic Spinal Tumors: Comparing the MiniOpen Approach to the Open Approach

MEDIASTINAL STAGING surgical pro

Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer. Masters of Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery Orlando September 19, 2014

Jose Ramos. Role of Surgery in isolated hepatic metastasis from breast carcinoma, melanoma or sarcoma

Oncology General Principles L A U R I E S I M A R D B R E A S T S U R G I C A L O N C O L O G Y F E L L O W D E C E M B E R

Jessa Hospital - Hasselt, Belgium

Ippocration Hospital University of Athens - Athens, Greece

Clinica Medellin - Medellin, Colombia

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Cork University Hospital - Cork, Ireland

Maria João Cardoso, MD, PhD

CASE REPORT An Innovative Solution to Complex Inguinal Defect: Deepithelialized SIEA Flap With Mini Abdominoplasty

Alexandrovska Hospital - Sofia, Bulgaria

Radiation-Induced Soft-Tissue Fibrosarcoma: Surgical Therapy and Salvage

The Case FOR Oncoplastic Surgery in Small Breasts. Barbara L. Smith, MD, PhD Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston, MA USA

Case Study. TRAM Flap Reconstruction with an Associated Complication. Repair using DermaMatrix Acellular Dermis.

Management of Neck Metastasis from Unknown Primary

SURGICAL INDICATIONS AND COMPLICATIONS OF CAPENER TECHNIQUE (COSTO-TRANSVERSECTOMY).

The Value of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Pulmonary and Chest Wall Resection for Bronchogenic Carcinoma

Decision making in surgical oncology- when to cut big, when to cut small

Pulmonary laser resections: Technical aspects and results in colorectal cancer

508 Ann Thorac Surg 46: , Nov Copyright by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy in Thai Men with Prostate Cancer

Results of Chest Wall Resection and Reconstruction With and Without Rigid Prosthesis

HOSPITAL MODELO - LA CORUÑA, Spain

When to Integrate Surgery for Metatstatic Urothelial Cancers

Evaluation of prognostic scoring systems for bone metastases using single center data

Civic Hospital of Sanremo ASL 1 Imperiese - Sanremo, Italy

Locally-Advanced Ulcerative T4b Breast Cancer; Are Reconstructive Attempts Feasible?

Breast Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up

San Donato Hospital - Azienda USL TOSCANA SUDEST Arezzo - Arezzo, Italy

Groote Schuur Academic Hospital - Cape Town, South Africa

Hospital Universitari La Fe - Valencia, Spain

Guven Hospital - Ankara, Turkey

The Imaging Journey of Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Experience of a Tertiary Mesothelioma MDT

Interesting Case Series. Scalp Reconstruction With Free Latissimus Dorsi Muscle

Immediate Reconstruction of Full-Thickness Chest Wall Defects

CASE REPORT PLEOMORPHIC LIPOSARCOMA OF PECTORALIS MAJOR MUSCLE IN ELDERLY MAN- CASE REPORT & REVIEW OF LITERATURE.

Recurrence following Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ with Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction

HEPATIC METASTASES. We can state 3 types of metastases depending on their treatment options:

Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer. Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Breast Clinica de la Mama and Italian Hospital - La Plata, Argentina

University Clinical Center Banja Luka, Breast Center - Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

The right middle lobe is the smallest lobe in the lung, and

Research Article Immediate versus Delayed Sarcoma Reconstruction: Impact on Outcomes

and Strength of Recommendations

Title: What is the role of pre-operative PET/PET-CT in the management of patients with

Solitary Contralateral Adrenal Metastases after Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma

Radiofrequency ablation combined with conventional radiotherapy: a treatment option for patients with medically inoperable lung cancer

MUSCLE-INVASIVE AND METASTATIC BLADDER CANCER

Brustzentrum Marienhospital Bottrop - Bottrop, Germany

Bone PET/MRI : Diagnostic yield in bone metastases and malignant primitive bone tumors

Design variations in vertical muscle-sparing thoracotomy

Tata Memorial Hospital - Mumbai, India

Chest wall resection and reconstruction for tumors: analysis of oncological and functional outcome

Endoscopic assisted harvest of the pedicled pectoralis major muscle flap

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Extended Resection of Chest Wall Tumors with Reconstruction Using Poly Methyl Methacrylate-Mesh Prosthesis

Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital - Johannesburg, South Africa

Medical Review Criteria Breast Surgeries

Transcription:

Original Article Sternal resection and reconstruction for secondary malignancies Wojciech Dudek 1, Waldemar Schreiner 1, Raymund E. Horch 2, Horia Sirbu 1 1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, 2 Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany Contributions: (I) Conception and design: W Dudek; (II) Administrative support: None; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: RE Horch, H Sirbu; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: W Dudek; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: W Dudek, W Schreiner; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. Correspondence to: Wojciech Dudek, MD. Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Krankenhausstr. 12, Erlangen 91054, Germany. Email: wojciech.dudek@doctors.org.uk. Background: Limited data on sternal and/or anterior chest wall resections for secondary malignancies exist. The purpose of this study was to examine the perioperative outcomes and postoperative overall survival (OS) in patients who underwent sternal and/or anterior chest wall resections for secondary sternal tumors (SSTs). Methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent resection of SSTs at single institution between 2000 and 2016 has been performed. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Ten patients underwent sternal and/or anterior chest wall resection for SSTs with curative (70%) or palliative (30%) intent. Two (20%) patients underwent complete and 8 (80%) partial sternal and/or anterior chest wall resection. There were no perioperative deaths, major complications occurred in 3 (30%) patients. Tumor resection was complete (R0) in 5 (50%) patients. The 5-year OS rate was 40%. No OS difference in R0 vs. R1 resections was observed. Conclusions: Sternal and/or anterior chest wall resections for SSTs can be performed with low morbidity and mortality. Complete SST resection does not assure favorable OS. Sternal resections can be considered palliative treatment option in patients with stable stage IV disease with isolated sternal involvement. Keywords: Sternal metastases; sternal resection and reconstruction; chest wall Submitted Mar 26, 2018. Accepted for publication May 26, 2018. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.06.18 View this article at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.06.18 Introduction Secondary sternal tumors (SSTs) are uncommon and, except for breast cancer SSTs, limited data on surgical management of metastatic sternal malignancies have been published. Sternal resection with concomitant reconstruction of the anterior chest wall defect was recommended for primary sternal tumors as curative, and proposed for SSTs as mainly palliative intent option (1,2). Five-year overall survival (OS) of 0% to 73% in patients undergoing sternal resections for SSTs has been reported (1). The purpose of this study was to examine the perioperative outcomes and postoperative OS in patients undergoing extensive full-thickness sternal and/or anterior chest wall resections for SSTs. Methods The records of 10 consecutive patients, who between January 2000 and December 2016 underwent resection of SSTs involving the sternum and/or anterior ribs at single institution, were reviewed. The study was granted the approval of the trust s Institutional Review Board (registration number 126_18 Bc). Individual patient consent for this retrospective observational study was not required. Surgery was indicated in patients with solitary metastasis in whom the resection was likely to increase survival (curative intent). Patients with advanced primary tumor disease and/or skin ulceration from concomitant sternal metastasis or local tumor invasion were considered

Journal of Thoracic Disease, Vol 10, No 7 July 2018 4231 A B the resection of the clavicular heads, depending on tumour location. All resections were performed en bloc, involving the affected neighboring soft tissue, medial parts of anterior ribs, lung or pericardium. A target bone resection margin was >2 cm. Intraoperative frozen section of the resected specimen was performed to assess the resection margin. Anterior chest wall defects were reconstructed with prosthetic mesh and covered with the pedicled muscle or musculocutaneous flap involving chest wall or abdominal musculature. Extended resections involving sternum and anterior ribs required additional reinforcement with the metal plates. Figure 1 Coronal (A) and lateral (B) chest CT images in patient #8. CT, computed tomography. candidates for palliative intent resection. Resectability of the sternal tumor, based on its location and extent was assessed pre-operatively by computed tomography (CT) (Figure 1), and in recent patients by 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positronemission tomography (18-FDG PET). Cardiorespiratory fitness was routinely assessed in all surgical candidates. There were no established patient selection criteria for sternal resections. Before the surgery was offered, all patients were presented at the multidisciplinary tumor conference, where the treatment options were discussed. All sternal resections and reconstructions were performed electively, as a single stage procedure, by the team consisting of thoracic and plastic surgeons. The resection followed by chest wall reinforcement with prosthetic material was performed by the thoracic surgeon; the coverage of sternal/chest wall defect with the chest wall musculature/pedicled musculocutaneous flap was performed by the plastic surgeon. For defect coverage with the flap involving abdominal musculature, assistance from general surgeon was required. Surgical technique Depending on skin and subcutaneous tissue involvement, a vertical midline incision, comprising the site of transcutaneous biopsy, or elliptical wide skin resection was the initial step of the sternal resection. Complete sternectomy was performed for large tumors involving both parts of the sternum or manubriosternal junction. Sternal body sparing manubrial resection was made with or without Statistical analysis Due to the small sample size, only descriptive statistics were performed. OS was calculated from the date of sternal resection as a starting point to the date of death or the most recent follow-up as the end point. It was estimated by the Kaplan-Maier method using SPSS version 18 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results Ten consecutive patients underwent sternal and/or anterior chest wall resection for SST in our department. There were 6 females and 4 males with a median age of 53 years (range, 30 86 years). Eight (80%) patients were complaining of chest pain prior to surgery. Breast cancer was the most common metastatic sternal tumor (n=5, 50%). Two patients with breast cancer had isolated metastatic lesion, and 3 had anterior chest wall invasion from recurrent breast cancer. Two (20%) sternal resections were performed for ulcerating metastatic malignant melanoma, 1 (10%) for metastatic colorectal cancer, 1 (10%) for metastatic renal cell cancer and 1 (10%) for metastatic cervical cancer. The sternal body, with or without anterior rib involvement, was the most common location (n=4, 40%); the tumor involved the manubrium in 2 (20%) patients, both parts of the sternum in 2 (20%) patients and anterior ribs only in 2 (20%) patients. Preoperative patient characteristics are listed in Table 1. Median perioperative interval, between the resection of the primary tumour and sternal resection, was 50.5 months (range, 17 103 months). Complete resection of the sternum was performed in 2 (20%) patients, partial sternal resection in 6 (60%) patients and resection of the anterior ribs in 2 (20%) patients. Seven (70%) patients underwent curative intent

4232 Dudek et al. Surgery for sternal metastases Table 1 Preoperative characteristics Patient Gender Age at SM (years) Co-morbidities Preoperative assessment Tumor location Primary tumour Patient 1 M 36 Renal insufficiency CT Manubrium + sternal body Renal cancer Patient 2 M 55 Hyperuricemia CT Sternal body Malignant melanoma Patient 3 M 70 Hypertension, hyperuricemia CT Sternal body Colorectal cancer Patient 4 F 51 Hypertension, stroke, DVT CT Manubrium Breast cancer Patient 5 M 62 Hypertension, BPH CT, PET Manubrium Malignant melanoma Patient 6 F 43 None CT, MRI, core biopsy Sternal body Breast cancer Patient 7 F 86 AF, hypertension CT 4th right rib Breast cancer Patient 8 F 45 None CT Sternal body + 3rd 6th left rib Breast cancer Patient 9 F 59 Hypertension, paroxysmal AF, hypothyroidism CT 2nd 4th left rib Breast cancer Patient 10 F 30 None CT, PET Manubrium + sternal body Cervical cancer M, male; F, female; SM, sternal metastasectomy; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia; AF, atrial fibrillation; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET, positron emission tomography. Figure 2 Rectus abdominis myocutaneous pedicled flap. resection vs. 3 (30%) patients with sternum metastases of malignant melanoma (n=2, 20%) and cervical cancer (n=1, 10%) causing breakdown of the overlying skin underwent palliative resection. Nine (90%) sternal reconstructions were performed with the implantation of the marlex (n=5, 56%), vicryl (n=3, 33%) and prolene mesh (n=1, 11%). Chest wall stability was reinforced with methylmethacrylate in 5 patients. In 1 patient who underwent complete sternectomy the anterior chest wall stabilisation with 2 metal plates (Synthes USA, West Chester, PA, USA) was performed. In 9 (90%) patients musculocutaneous flaps were used as a tissue coverage of the sternal/chest wall defect (rectus abdominis n=5, pectoralis major n=3, latissimus dorsi n=2) (Figure 2). The average duration of the surgery was 5.2 hours (range, 3.1 9.9 hours). The aesthetic outcome of the performed resections was acceptable (Figure 3). No perioperative deaths occurred. Major (grade III/IV) complications occurred in 3 patients (30%), including 1 patient with postoperative hemothorax and 1 with empyema requiring surgical intervention. One patient developed left subclavian vein thrombosis. Other complications included 1 urinary tract infection and 1 wound seroma requiring needle aspiration. Average postoperative hospital stay was 20.3 days (range, 10 38 days). Detailed peri- and postoperative characteristics are shown in Table 2. Complete (R0) tumor resection was achieved in 5 (50%) patients. Three patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and other 3 with incomplete tumour resection received adjuvant radiotherapy. Two patients (#9 and #10) were initially offered adjuvant radiation but due to complicated postoperative course and consequently reduced condition the radiotherapy was withheld. After a median follow-up of 26.5 months (range, 4 142 months) 9 (90%) patients had died. The 3- and

Journal of Thoracic Disease, Vol 10, No 7 July 2018 4233 Figure 3 Aesthetic long-term outcome after partial sternectomy with TRAM reconstruction in patient #8. TRAM, transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. 5-year survival rates were 40% (Figure 4). In patients with incomplete tumour resection the median survival was 92 vs. 23 months in patients with complete resection. Discussion SSTs are uncommon and usually originate from the breast, thyroid or renal cancer (3). They constitute 15% of malignant sternal tumors and mostly affect the sternal body (4). Due to the low incidence and therefore, limited published data there is, in contrast to primary sternal tumors, no consensus on the management of SSTs, in particular of the non-breast cancer origin. In the setting of disseminated stage IV disease with sternal involvement, the conservative chemotherapy, radiation or hormonal therapy, depending on the tumor origin, has been recommended. For isolated SSTs also the surgical option including the resection of the whole sternum or its affected part with concomitant reconstruction can be taken into consideration as a part of the multimodality approach (5-7). The main benefits of the surgery for SSTs are pain reduction or relief, maintenance of pulmonary function and better infection control within the overlying skin and soft tissues, particularly after previous radiation (8). As the sternum provides essential support to the thoracic spine, the role of sternal resection and stabilisation of the anterior chest in preventing pathological fractures and acute spinal deformity with consequent neurological injury is also of importance. Prophylactic resection to prevent secondary sternal fracture has not been recommended (6). In our group 7 resections were undertaken with curative intent and 3 to palliate the ulcerated skin and soft tissue overlying the sternum. We found that sternal resections for SSTs can be performed with low perioperative morbidity and associated with acceptable survival. Two (20%) our patients required major thoracic surgical interventions during the perioperative period. One thoracotomy for evacuation of haemothorax on the 17th postoperative day and one for decortication for pleural empyema on the 22th postoperative day were performed. One patient was successfully managed with the antibiotics for UTI; in 1 patient the ultrasound guided needle aspiration of the submuscular seroma was performed. The OS rate of 40% after 3 and 5 years in our group is consistent with those observed by other authors (1,5,8). A high rate of incomplete resections in our presented cohort has to be noted. In contrast to the primary sternal tumors, where the resection margins have been clearly defined (9,10), there is lacking data on the resection extent (wide vs. marginal) for SSTs, except for locally recurrent breast cancer (11,12). We recommend that the curative sternal resections should be performed to achieve a tumor-free margin. In our group we did not observe the dependence between OS and the completeness of the tumor resection. Paradoxically, patients with R1 resection had more favorable survival compared to those with complete resection. This could result from patient selection or could be a sequel of the stage IV disease. Due to the small size of our series and its heterogeneity we are unable to conclude that the resection margin is of no relevance in patients with SSTs. Similar observations have been reported by other authors (1). The single-centre retrospective design, small number of highly selected patients and the heterogeneity of the presented group are the main limitations of our study. Conclusions In conclusion, our results support the evidence that secondary sternal malignancies can be safely managed by sternal/anterior chest wall resection and reconstruction with low perioperative mortality and morbidity. To assess the influence of the resection margin status on OS after sternal

4234 Dudek et al. Surgery for sternal metastases Table 2 Peri- and postoperative characteristics Patient Surgical technique Early complications Late complications Resection Survival (months) #1 Resection: manubrium + body of sternum, SCJ bilateral None None R0 19 Reconstruction: marlex mesh, pectoralis flap #2 Resection: body of sternum (partial) None None R1 10 Reconstruction: marlex mesh, VRAM #3 Resection: body of sternum (partial) None None R0 98 Reconstruction: marlex mesh, VRAM #4 Resection: manubrium (partial) Left subclavian vein Reconstruction: marlex mesh thrombosis, wound seroma None R1 141 #5 Resection: manubrium, SCJ bilateral None None R1 92 Reconstruction: pectoralis flap #6 Resection: body of sternum (partial), 4th 5th left rib None None R1 142 Reconstruction: marlex mesh, pectoralis flap #7 Resection: 4th right rib None None R0 30 Reconstruction: vicryl mesh, VRAM #8 Resection: body of sternum (partial), 3rd 6th left ribs None None R0 23 Reconstruction: vicryl mesh, TRAM #9 Resection: 2nd 4th left ribs Empyema None R0 9 Reconstruction: vicryl mesh, LD and pectoralis flap #10 Resection: manubrium + body of sternum, 2nd 10th ribs bilaterally, diaphragm and pericardium (partial) Haemothorax, UTI None R1 4 Reconstruction: prolene mesh, 3 metal plates, LD flap SCJ, sternoclavicular joint; VRAM, vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap; TRAM, transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap; LD, latissimus dorsi; UTI, urinary tract infection. Overall survival 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 resection larger cohorts need to be studied. In selected patients with isolated SSTs the surgery should be offered as a quality of life maintaining treatment of choice, associated with acceptable survival. Acknowledgements None. 0.2 0.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Time after sternal resection (months) Footnote Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Figure 4 Postoperative overall survival. Ethical Statement: The study was granted the approval of

Journal of Thoracic Disease, Vol 10, No 7 July 2018 4235 the trust s Institutional Review Board (registration number 126_18 Bc). Individual patient consent for this retrospective observational study was not required. References 1. Ahmad U, Yang H, Sima C, et al. Resection of Primary and Secondary Tumors of the Sternum: An Analysis of Prognostic Variables. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;100:215-21; discussion 221-2. 2. Bongiolatti S, Voltolini L, Borgianni S, et al. Short and long-term results of sternectomy for sternal tumours. J Thorac Dis 2017;9:4336-46. 3. Shen KR. Resection of Sternal Tumors. In: Dienemann HC, Hoffmann H, Detterbeck FC, editors. Chest Surgery. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015:439-47. 4. Urovitz EP, Fornasier VL, Czitrom AA. Sternal metastases and associated pathological fractures. Thorax 1977;32:444-8. 5. Incarbone M, Nava M, Lequaglie C, et al. Sternal resection for primary or secondary tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;114:93-9. 6. Piggott RP, Curtin M, Munigangaiah S, et al. Sternal metastasis - the forgotten column and its effect on thoracic spine stability. World J Orthop 2017;8:455-60. 7. Scarnecchia E, Liparulo V, Pica A, et al. Multidisciplinary approach to chest wall resection and reconstruction for chest wall tumors, a single center experience. J Thorac Dis 2017;9:5093-100. 8. Koppert LB, van Geel AN, Lans TE, et al. Sternal resection for sarcoma, recurrent breast cancer, and radiation-induced necrosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;90:1102-8.e2. 9. Billè A, Okiror L, Karenovics W, et al. Experience with titanium devices for rib fixation and coverage of chest wall defects. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012;15:588-95. 10. Gonfiotti A, Santini PF, Campanacci D, et al. Malignant primary chest-wall tumours: techniques of reconstruction and survival. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;38:39-45. 11. Soysal O, Walsh GL, Nesbitt JC, et al. Resection of sternal tumors: extent, reconstruction, and survival. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1353-8; discussion 1358-9. 12. Levy Faber D, Fadel E, Kolb F, et al. Outcome of fullthickness chest wall resection for isolated breast cancer recurrence. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;44:637-42. Cite this article as: Dudek W, Schreiner W, Horch RE, Sirbu H. Sternal resection and reconstruction for secondary malignancies.. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.06.18