It is estimated that 215,020 cases of lung cancer were newly

Similar documents
Management Guidelines and Targeted Therapies in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Oncologist s Perspective

Key Words. Bevacizumab Avastin Nonsquamous Non-small cell lung cancer First-line Advanced/metastatic disease

Is Bevacizumab (Avastin) Safe and Effective as Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Adult Patients With Stage IIIb or IV Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC)?

Cancer Cell Research 14 (2017)

Choosing Optimal Therapy for Advanced Non-Squamous (NS) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Histology: Its Influence on Therapeutic Decision Making

OUR EXPERIENCES WITH ERLOTINIB IN SECOND AND THIRD LINE TREATMENT PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED STAGE IIIB/ IV NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER

1st line chemotherapy and contribution of targeted agents

trial update clinical

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer incidences and

Saudi Journal of Medicine (SJM)

Antiangiogenic Agents in NSCLC Where are we? Which biomarkers? VEGF Is the Only Angiogenic Factor Present Throughout the Tumor Life Cycle

Squamous Cell Carcinoma Standard and Novel Targets.

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

EGFR inhibitors in NSCLC

Targeted therapy in lung cancer : experience of NIO-RABAT

Angiogenesis and tumor growth

1st-line Chemotherapy for Advanced disease

The addition of bevacizumab to systemic chemotherapy has

Targeted Agents as Maintenance Therapy. Karen Kelly, MD Professor of Medicine UC Davis Cancer Center

Background. Azzoli CG et al. J Clin Oncol 2009; 2 Sandler A et al. NEJM 2006; 3

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the

Nivolumab: esperienze italiane nel carcinoma polmonare avanzato

MAINTENANCE TREATMENT CHEMO MAINTENANCE OR TARGETED OF BOTH? Martin Reck Department of Thoracic Oncology LungenClinic Grosshansdorf

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): Docetaxel (Taxotere )

The New England Journal of Medicine COMPARISON OF FOUR CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS FOR ADVANCED NON SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in

SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION. London, 21 August 2007 Product Name: Avastin EMEA/H/C/582/II/09

Antiangiogenici in combinazione a chemioterapia in prima linea: bevacizumab

LUNG CANCER TREATMENT: AN OVERVIEW

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Multidisciplinary Role: Role of Medical Oncologist

Metastatic NSCLC: Expanding Role of Immunotherapy. Evan W. Alley, MD, PhD Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Presbyterian

Strategies in the therapy of advanced NSCLC SAMO Winter-Conference 2008 on Chest tumors

Exploring Personalized Therapy for First Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Welcome to today s presentation titled In Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Evidence-Based Rationale for ALIMTA on Clinical Pathways.

Reflex Testing Guidelines for Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Maintenance Therapy for Advanced NSCLC: Which Patients, Which Approach?

In 2005, we reported a clinical model to predict survival in

in combination with cisplatin as first-line doublet 3 as maintenance agent following non-pemetrexed platinum doublet 4

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Primary Endpoint The primary endpoint is overall survival, measured as the time in weeks from randomization to date of death due to any cause.

Targeted Therapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Update

Maintenance paradigm in non-squamous NSCLC

Bevacizumab treatment for advanced non small cell lung cancer: A case report

Monoclonal Antibodies in the Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): 2016 Update Angioinhibitors and EGFR MAbs

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in both

NEWS RELEASE Media Contact: Megan Pace Investor Contact: Kathee Littrell Patient Inquiries: Ajanta Horan

Evolving Paradigms in HER2+ MBC: Strategies for Individualizing Therapy with Available Agents

2 nd line Therapy and Beyond NSCLC. Alan Sandler, M.D. Oregon Health & Science University

Oncologist. The. ASCO 2000: Critical Commentaries. Lung Cancer Highlights THOMAS J. LYNCH, JR. ABSTRACT

Thoracic and head/neck oncology new developments

Media Release. Basel, 17 May 2018

Oncologist. The. Lung Cancer. Bevacizumab Treatment to Progression After Chemotherapy: Outcomes from a U.S. Community Practice Network

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 29 June 2011 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta227

Bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent advanced ovarian cancer

Lung cancer imposes a considerable public health and

Research Article Prognostic Factors in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Patient Characteristics and Type of Chemotherapy

AHFS Final. line. Criteria Used in. combined. cisplatin. Strength. established was. Non-small Cell Lung. Cancer: of carboplatin and

Long-term safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC): 24-month update of the pivotal ERIVANCE BCC study

Temporal Trends in Demographics and Overall Survival of Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients at Moffitt Cancer Center From 1986 to 2008

Maintenance Therapy for Advanced NSCLC: When, What, Why & What s Left After Post-Maintenance Relapse?

Frequency of Epidermal Growth Factor Mutation Status and Its Effect on Outcome of Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Lung

Key Words. Erlotinib Non-small cell lung cancer Maintenance treatment

National Horizon Scanning Centre. Bevacizumab (Avastin) for glioblastoma multiforme - relapsed. August 2008

Combined Modality Therapy State of the Art. Everett E. Vokes The University of Chicago

Survival of patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma before and after approved use of gefitinib in China

Global Health Outcomes, Lilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, DC6831, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA 3

Paclitaxel Carboplatin Alone or with Bevacizumab for Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Correlation of pretreatment surgical staging and PET SUV(max) with outcomes in NSCLC. Giancarlo Moscol, MD PGY-5 Hematology-Oncology UTSW

Disease progression after initial platinum-based chemotherapy

Media Release. Basel, 26 March 2018

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 29 April 2009

CheckMate 012: Safety and Efficacy of First Line Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Case 1 Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: What Therapy Should I Select First?

RESEARCH ARTICLE. Ying Fang, Li Wang, Guo-Hao Xia, Mei-Qi Shi* Abstract. Introduction. Materials and Methods

Maintenance therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Egbert F. Smit MD PhD Dept Thoracic Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80% of

1 st line chemotherapy and contribution of targeted agents in non-driver addicted NSCLC

Plotting the course: optimizing treatment strategies in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma

SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION

NSCLC: Terapia medica nella fase avanzata. Paolo Bidoli S.C. Oncologia Medica H S. Gerardo Monza

Treatment of EGFR mutant advanced NSCLC

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): SAR (iniparib)

Heather Wakelee, M.D.

National Horizon Scanning Centre. Bevacizumab (Avastin) in combination with non-taxanes for metastatic breast cancer - first line therapy

RESEARCH ARTICLE. Kuanoon Boupaijit, Prapaporn Suprasert* Abstract. Introduction. Materials and Methods

Pemetrexed in the maintenance treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

HOW TO GET THE MOST INFORMATION FROM A TUMOR BIOPSY

LONDON CANCER NEW DRUGS GROUP RAPID REVIEW. Erlotinib for the third or fourth-line treatment of NSCLC January 2012

The role of cytoreductive. nephrectomy in elderly patients. with metastatic renal cell. carcinoma in an era of targeted. therapy

Single Technology Appraisal (STA)

How I Treat Stage IV Non Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Absence of Any Actionable Oncogenic Driver

Gemcitabine: Efficacy in the Treatment of Advanced Stage Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

NEWS RELEASE Media Contact: Krysta Pellegrino (650) Investor Contact: Sue Morris (650) Advocacy Contact: Kristin Reed (650)

Cisplatin plus Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine for Biliary Tract Cancer. Valle J et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362(14):

Biomarkers of Response to EGFR-TKIs EORTC-NCI-ASCO Meeting on Molecular Markers in Cancer November 17, 2007

Revisiting Stage IIIB and IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Data

Medical Treatment of Advanced Lung Cancer

EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Prolong Overall Survival in EGFR Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Postsurgical Recurrence

Transcription:

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Treatment Outcomes by Tumor Histology in Eastern Cooperative Group Study E4599 of Bevacizumab with Paclitaxel/Carboplatin for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD,* Jing Yi, PhD, Suzanne Dahlberg, PhD, Margaret M. Kolb, DrPH, Lisa Wang, PhD, Julie Hambleton, MD, Joan Schiller, MD, and David H. Johnson, MD *Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California; Department of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee. Disclosure: Alan Sandler, MD, received a grant for this study and serves as a consultant and on the advisory board for Genentech. Jing Yi, PhD, and her husband are employed by Genentech. Margaret M. Kolb, DrPH, serves as a paid consultant to Genentech. Lisa Wang, PhD, and Julie Hambleton, MD, are employed by and hold stock in Genentech. Joan Schiller, MD, serves on the advisory board for Genentech. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest. Address for correspondence: Alan Sandler, MD, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code: L586, Portland, OR 97239-398. E-mail: sandlera@ohsu.edu Presented as an abstract (a portion of the tumor histology analysis described in this article) at the International Association of Lung Cancer Annual Meeting in Chicago, IL, 28. Copyright 21 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer ISSN: 1556-864/1/59-1416 Introduction: The combination of paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC) and bevacizumab (B) was previously shown to extend overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An analysis of survival and safety outcomes based on histology is presented here. Methods: Patients with cytologically or histologically confirmed metastatic NSCLC were treated with PC B (PCB) or PC. Median OS for all patients was determined using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using an unstratified Cox proportional hazards model. Histology-by-treatment interaction was tested with an unstratified multivariate Cox regression model. Results: A total of 444 patients were randomized to PC, and 434 patients were randomized to PCB (the intent-to-treat population). Median OS times were 1.3 and 12.3 months for PC and PCB, respectively, with an HR for PCB of.8 (95% CI:.69.93). A total of 68.8% of patients had adenocarcinoma histology; 18.9% had not otherwise specified ; 5.5% had large cell undifferentiated; 2.6% had bronchoalveolar carcinoma; and 3.9% other. For adenocarcinoma, median OS was 1.3 months for PC treatment (n 32) and 14.2 months for PCB (n 3), HR.69 (95%CI:.58.83). Sample sizes for other specific histologic subtypes were too small for meaningful comparisons. Safety profiles among histologies were consistent with the overall safety profile, and there were no unexpected adverse event trends. Conclusions: Addition of B to PC is associated with increased survival in previously untreated patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. Adenocarcinoma was associated with an increased survival benefit of PCB treatment. Data for other histologies are inconclusive, primarily because of small patient sample sizes and large CIs. Key Words: Non-small cell lung cancer, Bevacizumab, Nonsquamous, Histology, Adenocarcinoma. (J Thorac Oncol. 21;5: 1416 1423) It is estimated that 215,2 cases of lung cancer were newly diagnosed in 28 and that more than 16, men and women died of the disease. 1 Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for more than 85% of all lung cancers. 2 The recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody bevacizumab (B; Avastin; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) in combination with paclitaxel (P) and carboplatin (C) is approved by Food and Drug Administration for first-line treatment of patients with unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. 3 6 B binds to a vascular endothelial growth factor, an essential endothelial cell mitogen and survival factor, and a key factor in tumorassociated angiogenesis. In a phase III randomized control trial conducted by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), the median overall survival (OS) for patients with NSCLC receiving PC B (PCB) was 12.3 months, compared with 1.3 months for patients who received paclitaxel/ carboplatin (PC) alone. 3 The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 6.2 months for patients who received PCB, compared with 4.5 months for patients who received PC alone. The diagnosis of NSCLC comprises a number of histologies based primarily on pathologic or cytologic review of surgical specimens. The most common histologies are ade- 1416

Treatment Outcomes by Tumor Histology in ECOG Study nocarcinoma (the most frequently encountered histology in NSCLC), squamous cell, and large cell carcinomas. 2 Bronchoalveolar carcinoma is a subtype of adenocarcinoma. In addition, NSCLC can be classified as not otherwise specified (NOS) or other, which includes rare subtypes such as spindle and giant cell carcinomas or carcinosarcomas. The contribution of histology to the natural history or treatment outcomes in NSCLC is not fully characterized. Most prior studies evaluating therapeutics for treatment of NSCLC have not documented differences in outcomes (survival or toxicity) based on tumor histology. 7 A phase III study comparing four different regimens conducted in the 198s 8 and a more recent trial comparing docetaxel/gemcitabine with docetaxel/cisplatin 9 documented different response rates but no differences in survival rates, based on different histologies. Recently, however, Scagliotti et al 1 compared tumor histologies and effects on survival outcomes for patients treated with cisplatin/pemetrexed or cisplatin/gemcitabine. Patients treated with cisplatin/pemetrexed had more favorable survival outcomes if they had tumors of adenocarcinoma histology (n 847; 12.6 versus 1.9 months, respectively) or large-cell carcinoma histology (n 153; 1.4 versus 6.7 months, respectively), compared with patients receiving cisplatin/gemcitabine. Conversely, the cisplatin/gemcitabine combination showed greater efficacy against squamous histologies than cisplatin/pemetrexed. 1 The correlation of tumor histology with B treatment outcomes has not been analyzed previously, although patients with squamous lung cancer have historically been excluded from pivotal trials of B because of a safety concern, namely pulmonary hemorrhage. 3 5 This report presents the results of a retrospective analysis of NSCLC histology in first-line patients from the E4599 phase III trial of PC versus PCB and assesses the survival and toxicity outcomes based on different histology subtypes. METHODS Patient Population and Histologies Patients in the phase III E4599 study 3 had histologically or cytologically confirmed, newly diagnosed stage IIIB (malignant pleural effusion, not recurrent) or stage IV (recurrent or not recurrent) nonsquamous NSCLC. Histology was confirmed at baseline, including adenocarcinoma, bronchoalveolar, large cell undifferentiated, NOS, and other. Mixed tumors were categorized by the predominant cell type unless small cell histologic elements were present, in which case the patient was ineligible. Cytologic or histologic elements were established on metastatic tumor aspirates or biopsy (centralized review of histology and pathology review were not performed, and core biopsies were not required for histologic categorization). Other eligibility criteria for E4599 have been described by Sandler et al, 3 including ECOG performance status of or 1; adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function; and informed consent. Exclusion criteria included history of major hemoptysis, brain metastasis, recent history of bleeding or thrombotic events, uncontrolled hypertension, and ongoing therapeutic anticoagulation. Patients with either measurable or nonmeasurable disease were eligible. Investigations in patients were performed after approval by a local Human Investigations Committee and in accordance with an assurance filed with and approved by the Department of Health and Human Services. The E4599 intent-to-treat patient population included some patients in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) extended participation project, which was designed to extend clinical trial privileges to qualified oncologists who were not the members of an NCI cooperative group. 11 Study Design The study design for E4599 has been described. 3 Randomized patients (N 878) were stratified by the presence of measurable disease, prior radiotherapy, percentage weight loss ( 5%, 5%), and disease stage (IIIB not recurrent, IV not recurrent, and IV recurrent). Patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms: (1) treatment with P (2 mg/m 2, day 1), C (area under the curve 6 mg/ml, day 1) and B (15 mg/kg, day 1), or (2) treatment with PC alone. 3 Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks, and tumor assessments were performed every 6 weeks. Patients in the PC cohort stopped chemotherapy after six cycles. Patients on PCB stopped chemotherapy after six cycles and continued on B until disease progression. All tumor responses were determined using RECIST, and toxicity was graded using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria, version 2. (Cancer Therapy evaluation Program, April 3, 1999). The primary endpoint of the study was OS. Statistical Methods Baseline demographics and patient characteristics are provided for all enrolled patients and are summarized descriptively by histology subtypes. Categorical data are summarized by number (n) and percent, and continuous data are summarized by medians with ranges. Fisher s exact test was used to test for differences in categorical data. Efficacy analyses were performed for all randomized patients, the intent-to-treat population. The effects of histology type on duration of survival and PFS were prespecified in the Statistical Analysis Plan of the trial and were examined in exploratory analyses. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause; PFS was defined as time from randomization to disease progression or death from any cause. An unstratified Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for OS and PFS by histology subtype. Oneand 2-year OS rates were estimated for the two treatment arms based on Kaplan-Meier methodology. An unstratified multivariate Cox regression model adjusted for relevant prognostic factors (sex, presence of measurable disease, prior radiotherapy, percent weight loss [ 5%], and disease stage) was used to evaluate the histology-by-treatment interaction. Ad hoc statistical power was calculated for the subset analysis. For analysis of OS, patients who withdrew from the study or had missing data were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. For analysis of PFS, patients were censored at the time of last tumor assessment. In the previous report on the E4599 data by Sandler et al, 3 analyses were based on the evaluable patient population (n 85), not the intent-to-treat population (n 878) as Copyright 21 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer 1417

Sandler et al. reported here, thereby leading to slightly different point estimates. Sensitivity analysis for OS was performed for the protocol eligible patients in each histology subgroup. Extent of exposure data is presented for the 859 treated patients who were not in the NCI expanded participation project, which did not collect information on extent of exposure. The incidence of grade 3 to 5 toxicities was assessed by histology subtype for patients in both study treatment arms. This analysis was exploratory and not prespecified in the trial s statistical analysis plan. Results (n and percent) are provided descriptively. RESULTS Baseline Patient Characteristics by Histology A total of 878 intent-to-treat patients were randomized into the PC or PCB treatment arms, with 875 providing categorizable histology data. The predominant tumor histology was adenocarcinoma (68.8%), 18.9% of patients had tumors of NOS histology, 5.5% had large cell undifferentiated histology, 2.6% had bronchoalveolar (bronchoalveolar carcinoma) histology, and 3.9% had tumors of other histology (Table 1). Three patients (.3%) in the intent-to-treat population described in this report had squamous tumors. Baseline demographics and patient characteristics for the overall patient population and based on tumor histology are shown in Table 1. Median age ranged from 61 to 68 years, and there were very few patients younger than 4 years. Gender, weight loss, and ECOG performance status were comparable across the histology subtypes; breakdown according to baseline disease stage varied among histology subtypes (P.5) (Table 1). Demographic characteristics were similar across the PC or PCB treatment cohorts within each histology subgroup, except for sex, with a higher proportion of males in the adenocarcinoma PC cohort (P.4), compared with the PCB cohort and the overall patient population (P.3) (data not shown). Survival Outcomes Results are presented for the intent-to-treat patient population (n 878). For patients with adenocarcinoma histology (68.8% of patients), median OS was 1.3 months for treatment with PC alone and 14.2 months for PCB, with an HR of.69 (95% CI:.58.83) for PCB (Figure 1A). The 1-year survival rate for patients with adenocarcinoma was.565 (95% CI:.58.621) for PCB, and the 2-year sur- TABLE 1. Baseline Demographics and Patient Characteristics for Randomized Patients, by Histology Total (N 878) a Adenocarcinoma, n 62 (68.8%) Bronchoalveolar Carcinoma, n 23 (2.6%) Histology Large Cell Undifferentiated, n 48 (5.5%) Not Otherwise Specified, n 165 (18.9%) Squamous, n 3 (.3%) Other, n 34 (3.9%) Median age, yr (range) 63. (27 88) 62. (27 85) 68. (38 79) 61. (35 78) 64. (35 88) 63. (59 68) 65. (47 79) Sex, n (%) Male 478 (54.4) 323 (53.7) 13 (56.5) 3 (62.5) 89 (53.9) 2 (66.7) 19 (55.9) Female 4 (45.6) 279 (46.3) 1 (43.5) 18 (37.5) 76 (46.1) 1 (33.3) 15 (44.1) Race, n (%) White 753 (85.8) 513 (85.2) 2 (87.) 41 (85.4) 149 (9.3) 2 (66.7) 26 (76.5) Black 47 (5.4) 34 (5.6) 1 (4.3) 2 (4.2) 6 (3.6) 3 (8.8) Other race b 3 (3.4) 2 (3.3) 2 (8.7) 1 (2.1) 5 (3.) 1 (33.3) 1 (2.9) Other c 48 (5.5) 35 (5.8) (.) 4 (8.3) 5 (3.) (.) 4 (11.8) ECOG performance status, n (%) 346 (39.6) 233 (38.8) 9 (39.1) 22 (46.8) 69 (42.1) 1 (33.3) 12 (35.3) 1 528 (6.4) 368 (61.2) 14 (6.9) 25 (53.2) 95 (57.9) 2 (66.7) 22 (64.7) Prior radiotherapy, n (%) 8 (9.1) 54 (9.) 1 (4.3) 2 (4.2) 18 (11.) 1 (33.3) 4 (11.8) Disease stage, n (%) IIIb, not recurrent 18 (12.3) 9 (15.) 3 (6.3) 11 (6.7) 3 (8.8) IV, not recurrent 669 (76.4) 437 (72.7) 18 (78.3) 43 (89.6) 14 (84.8) 2 (66.7) 28 (82.4) IV, recurrent 99 (11.3) 74 (12.3) 5 (21.7) 2 (4.2) 14 (8.5) 1 (33.3) 3 (8.8) Measurable disease, n (%) 8 (91.2) 537 (89.2) 21 (91.3) 46 (95.8) 158 (95.8) 3 (1.) 33 (97.1) Weight loss in previous 6 mo, n (%) 5% 624 (71.6) 436 (72.8) 12 (54.5) 32 (66.7) 117 (71.8) 2 (66.7) 23 (67.6) 5 1% 155 (17.8) 12 (17.) 9 (4.9) 1 (2.8) 26 (16.) 1 (33.3) 7 (2.6) 1% 92 (1.6) 61 (1.2) 1 (4.5) 6 (12.5) 2 (12.2) 4 (11.8) a Histology data were missing for three patients. The denominator for all percentages presented is for number of patients with nonmissing values. b Other Race includes: Hispanic, Asian, Native American, Indian (Asian), or Filipino. c Other includes patient or institutional refusal to provide information, unknown, and other. ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. 1418 Copyright 21 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

Treatment Outcomes by Tumor Histology in ECOG Study A Overall Survival, by Histology Subtype: Hazard Ratios a and Forest Plots b Baseline Characteristic Total n PC Median n (months) PCB Median n (months) Hazard Ratio (95% CI) All patients 878 444 1.3 434 12.3.8 (.69 -.93) Histological type Adenocarcinoma 62 32 1.3 3 14.2.69 (.58 -.83) Large Cell Undifferentiated 48 3 8.7 18 1. 1.15 (.6-2.24) Squamous 3 2 12.3 1 22.4. (. - ) Bronchoalveolar (BAC) 23 11 17.7 12 1. 1.48 (.57-3.89) NSCLC, NOS 165 86 1. 79 9.5 1.16 (.84-1.61) Other 34 11 12.6 23 8.4.92 (.43-1.98) Hazard Ratio.2.5 1 2 5 B Duration of Survival for Adenocarcinoma, by Treatment Proportion Surviving 1..8.6.4.2. Patients at risk: PC PCB 32 3 C Progression-Free Survival: Hazard Ratios a and Forest Plots b Baseline Characteristic PC (n=32) PCB (n=3) 12 months, (95% CI).565 (.58,.621).433 (.376,.49) 284 247 216 18 149 126 96 281 265 249 224 193 165 146 Total n 82 7 51 122 1 81 PC Median n (months) 24 months, (95% CI).271 (.216,.326).168 (.121,.216) 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 22 24 26 28 3 32 34 36 38 4 42 44 46 48 5 Duration of Survival (months) PCB Median n (months) Hazard Ratio (95% CI) All patients 878 444 4.8 434 6.4.66 (.57 -.77) Histological type Adenocarcinoma 62 32 5. 3 6.6.65 (.54 -.78) Large Cell Undifferentiated 48 3 4.3 18 8.5.35 (.15 -.79) Squamous 3 2 7.1 1 22.4. (. - ) Bronchoalveolar (BAC) 23 11 4.5 12 6.1 1.9 (.43-2.79) NSCLC, NOS 165 86 4.7 79 5.7.78 (.55-1.9) Other 34 11 6. 23 6.6.54 (.19-1.52) 39 63 27 48 19 34 11 3 6 21 4 15 4 9 2 6 1 6 1 5 2 1 Hazard Ratio.2.5 1 2 5 FIGURE 1. Survival outcomes by histology type. A, Median OS and HR with forest plots are shown for PC- or PCB-treated NSCLC patients with different histology types. HRs are from unstratified models. B, Kaplan-Meier curves are shown for OS of patients with adenocarcinoma histology treated with PC or PCB; 12- and 24-month survival rates are indicated. C, Median PFS, described as for OS in (A). NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; NOS, not otherwise specified; PC, paclitaxel/carboplatin; PCB, paclitaxel/ carboplatin bevacizumab; OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; PFS, progression-free survival. vival rate was.271 (95% CI:.216.326) for PCB (Figure 1B). In this histology analysis, median PFS for patients with adenocarcinoma was 5. months for PC alone compared with 6.6 months for PCB (HR.65, 95% CI:.54.78) (Figure 1C). Sensitivity analysis was performed for evaluable patients with adenocarcinoma; median OS was 1.3 months for patients in the PC alone arm and 14.8 months for PCB, with an HR of.68 (95% CI:.56.82). For the NSCLC NOS subtype, the HR for OS associated with PCB treatment was 1.16 (95% CI:.84 1.61; Figure 1A), whereas the HR for PCB-associated PFS was.78 (95% CI:.55 1.9; Figure 1C). When all nonadenocarcinoma histologies were pooled, the median OS was 1.2 months for PC (n 14) and 9.6 months for PCB (n 133), HR 1.14 (95%CI:.88 1.47). The pooled nonadenocarcinoma group is a heterogenous group of histologies; the majority of patients have NOS histology, which is a poorly characterized histology. The addition of B to the PC seemed to result in a trend toward PFS benefit for patients with NOS tumor histology, but CIs were wide and results are not statistically significant for NOS. A treatment benefit for PFS associated with PCB combination therapy was noted across most other histology subtypes, but the results were not statistically significant. (Histology data were not available for one patient receiving PCB and for two patients receiving PC.) For PFS and OS, the point estimates for the interaction effect adjusted by sex, presence of measurable disease, prior Copyright 21 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer 1419

Sandler et al. TABLE 2. Exposure to Study Treatment for Treated Non-EPP a Patients, by Histology Adenocarcinoma Histology (n 592) NSCLC NOS Histology (n 16) Other Histologies b (n 17) PC (n 298) PCB (n 294) PC (n 84) PCB (n 76) PC (n 55) PCB (n 52) No. of treatment cycles received Mean (SE) 4.3 (.1) 9.4 (.4) 4.3 (.2) 7.1 (.7) 4. (.3) 8. (1.) Median (range) 5. (1 6) 8. (1 47) 5. (1 6) 6. (1 3) 4. (1 6) 5.5 (1 32) Duration of study treatment (mo), median (range) 2.8 (.3 13.6) 4.9 (.3 33.54) 3. (.3 12.75) 3.6 (.3 2.57) 2.2 (.3 4.63) 3.5 (.2 22.24) a Extent of exposure data was not collected for EPP patients. b Other histologies: large cell undifferentiated, bronchoalveolar, squamous, and other. EPP, expanded participation project; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; NOS, not otherwise specified; PC, paclitaxel/carboplatin; PCB, paclitaxel/carboplatin bevacizumab. radiotherapy, percentage of weight loss ( 5%), and disease stage suggest that there is no difference in the treatment benefit for the histology subtypes. An analysis of OS treatment effect adjusted by histology (P.9), gender (P.1), presence of measurable disease (P.9), prior radiotherapy (P.3), percentage of weight loss (P.1), and disease stage (P.53) showed that the benefit associated with PCB treatment remained; the adjusted HR indicates an approximately 19% reduction in the hazard of death among patients in the PCB arm compared with those in the PC arm (data not shown). Except for adenocarcinoma, the other histology subtypes included in this study were not sufficiently powered for significance testing of PFS and OS; for example, in the NSCLC NOS subgroup, for which 133 deaths were reported, the power to detect a 3% improvement in survival is only 33%. Exposure to Study Treatment Extent of exposure to study treatment varied by histology and treatment regimen (Table 2). (Nine patients in the NCI expanded participation project, in which exposure data were not routinely collected, were not included in the extent of exposure analyses.) For patients receiving PC, median number of treatment cycles (four to five cycles) and duration of treatment (2.2 3 months) were comparable across all histology subtypes. For patients with adenocarcinoma histology receiving PCB, the median number of cycles was 8. (range: 1 47), and median duration of study treatment was 4.9 months (range:.3 33.54). For patients with NOS and other histologies receiving PCB, the median number of cycles were 6. and 5.5, respectively (range: 1 3; 1 32), and the median durations of study treatment were 3.6 and 3.5 months, respectively (range:.3 2.57;.2 22.24). Although no patients in the PC treatment arm received more than six cycles (per protocol), 43.5 to 57.4% of patients in the PCB arm received more than 6 cycles, with 24.1% of adenocarcinoma patients exposed to more than or equal to double that number of cycles (data not shown). Safety Outcomes The safety profile across histologies was generally consistent with that seen in the overall study population, with no unexpected adverse event trends (Table 3). For the 868 safety evaluable patients in the study, the incidence of grade 3 hypertension, venous thromboembolic events, or proteinuria seemed to be higher in adenocarcinoma patients treated with PCB, compared with other histologies. However, comparative analysis is limited by the low total event numbers, the low numbers of patients with nonadenocarcinoma histologies, and the fact that patients with adenocarcinoma received longer study treatment with PCB. Although the incidence of grade 3 to 5 bleeding events associated with B treatment was higher in the PCB arms across all histologies, patients with NSCLC NOS experienced a greater incidence of grade 5 bleeding events (3 [3.8%] pulmonary hemorrhage events) than patients with other histologies (Table 3). Overall, there were 5 (1.7%) deaths among patients with adenocarcinoma histology because of protocol treatment. Patients with adenocarcinoma who were treated with PCB were less likely to die as a result of disease (62.3%) than patients with adenocarcinoma who received PC alone (71.2%) or patients with tumors of other histologies (Table 4). Five patients (1.7%) with adenocarcinoma who were treated with PCB died because of protocol treatment, versus 1 each for PC-treated patients with adenocarcinoma and for PCB-treated patients with other histologies. DISCUSSION The addition of B to PC chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC is associated with an increase in OS. 3 5 This retrospective analysis for the E4599 study examined the efficacy and safety outcomes based on tumor histology in patients treated with PC or PCB regimens. Adenocarcinoma was the most frequent histology in the study (68.8% of patients) and was associated with a favorable median OS (14.2 months [HR.69]) in patients who received PCB, the longest median survival duration that has been reported in patients with NSCLC, compared with patients who received PC alone (1.3 months). Median PFS time was also increased in adenocarcinoma patients treated with PCB (HR of.65, compared with patients who received PC). There seemed to be a consistent benefit associated with B treatment on PFS across all histology subtypes and in the overall population, but OS data for patients with the remaining histology subtypes are largely inconclusive. Patients with tumors of NOS histology, the second most frequent histology 142 Copyright 21 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

Treatment Outcomes by Tumor Histology in ECOG Study TABLE 3. Adverse Events for Treated Patients, by Histology a Adenocarcinoma Histology (n 596) NSCLC NOS Histology (n 164) Other Histologies b (n 18) PC c (n 299) PCB d (n 297) PC c (n 86) PCB d (n 78) PC c (n 56) PCB d (n 52) Any bleeding event e Grade 3 2 (.7) 4 (1.3) 1 (1.3) 2 (3.8) Grade 4 4 (1.3) 1 (1.9) Grade 5 3 (1.) 4 (1.3) 3 (3.8) 1 (1.9) Pulmonary hemorrhage f Grade 3 1 (.3) 2 (.7) Grade 4 1 (.3) Grade 5 1 (.3) 2 (.7) 3 (3.8) 1 (1.9) g Hypertension Grade 3 24 (8.1) 1 (1.2) 4 (5.1) 1 (1.8) 3 (5.8) Grade 4 1 (.3) 2 (.7) Arterial thromboembolic event Grade 3 1 (.3) 1 (1.3) 1 (1.9) Grade 4 5 (1.7) 3 (1.) 1 (1.3) Grade 5 1 (.3) 3 (1.) 1 (1.3) 1 (1.9) Venous thromboembolic events Grade 3 5 (1.7) 8 (2.7) 2 (2.3) 1 (1.9) Grade 4 5 (1.7) 12 (4.) 2 (2.3) 2 (2.6) Grade 5 1 (.3) Gastrointestinal perforation Grade 3 1 (.3) 4 (1.3) 2 (2.6) 1 (1.8) Grade 4 3 (1.) 1 (1.9) Proteinuria Grade 3 9 (3.) 1 (1.3) 1 (1.9) Grade 4 2 (.7) Neutropenia h Grade 4 55 (18.4) 83 (27.9) 12 (14.) 2 (25.6) 9 (16.1) 1 (19.2) a Events were graded according to NCI-CTC, version 2.. Events of maximum severity are reported for each patient. Rows for grade 5 events are only included for adverse events categories that included grade 5 events. b Other histologies include large cell undifferentiated, bronchoalveolar, squamous, and other. c Source data are from the case report form. d Source data are from the case report form and from the NCI Adverse Event Expedited Reporting System. e Any grade 3 to 5 bleeding events, including pulmonary hemorrhage. f Pulmonary hemorrhage events are a subset of bleeding events described in the row above. Hemoptysis was a preferred term for pulmonary hemorrhage events. g This patient had large cell undifferentiated histology. h Only grade 4 hematologic events are reported. NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; NOS, not otherwise specified; PC, paclitaxel/carboplatin; PCB, paclitaxel/carboplatin bevacizumab; NCI-CTC, National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria. subtype in E4599 (n 165), did not seem to show an OS benefit, but did trend toward a nonsignificant PFS benefit (HR.78, 95% CI:.55 1.9). Histologies in this study were not centrally reviewed before categorization. Because NOS encompasses a heterogeneous and poorly characterized group of histologies, 2 which may include squamous cell elements, it would behoove physicians to obtain adequate tissue specimen for more detailed analysis of NOS and other histologies. There were no new safety signals attributed to histology that emerged from this analysis. The incidence of adverse events associated with B therapy, such as grade 3 hypertension, venous thromboembolic events, or proteinuria, was higher in patients with adenocarcinoma who were treated with PCB, but the distribution of these events was not suggestive of a trend associated with histologic subtype. Moreover, patients in the PCB group had a longer median treatment time compared with the PC group, and only unadjusted incidence rates were reported in this analysis. Because of the limited numbers of patients with histology subtypes other than adenocarcinoma and the low numbers of grade 3 or bevaciumab-targeted events involved (25 grade 3 bleeding events reported in the entire population), small differences in event rates between treatment groups may not have been detected. The reasons for the selective survival advantage associated with adenocarcinoma histology in this study remain unclear. A histology analysis by Scagliotti et al 1 from a recent trial for patients who received cisplatin/pemetrexed, compared with patients who received cisplatin/gemcitabine, showed significant increased survival for patients with adenocarcinoma or large-cell histology who received cisplatin/ Copyright 21 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer 1421

Sandler et al. TABLE 4. Deaths on Study and Overall Incidence of Adverse Events for Treated Patients, by Histology a Adenocarcinoma Histology (n 596) NSCLC NOS Histology (n 164) Other Histologies b (n 18) PC c (n 299) PCB d (n 297) PC c (n 86) PCB d (n 78) PC c (n 56) PCB d (n 52) Total deaths, n (%) 239 (79.9) 216 (72.7) 75 (87.2) 7 (89.7) 47 (83.9) 43 (82.7) Because of protocol treatment 1 (.3) 5 (1.7) 1 (1.9) Because of disease 213 (71.2) 185 (62.3) 71 (82.6) 61 (78.2) 42 (75.) 41 (78.8) Because of other cause 11 (3.7) 16 (5.4) 3 (3.5) 6 (7.7) 1 (1.8) 1 (1.9) Unknown 12 (4.) 1 (3.4) 1 (1.2) 2 (2.6) 3 (5.4) Not stated 2 (.7) 1 (1.3) 1 (1.8) Grade 3 5 nonhematologic and grade 4 5 187 (62.5) 225 (75.8) 55 (64.) 65 (83.3) 44 (78.6) 44 (84.6) hematologic toxicities, n (%), total Grade 3 e 13 (34.4) 92 (31.) 34 (39.5) 29 (37.2) 28 (5.) 2 (38.5) Grade 4 77 (25.8) 19 (36.7) 2 (23.3) 25 (32.1) 15 (26.8) 17 (32.7) Grade 5 7 (2.3) 24 (8.1) 1 (1.2) 11 (14.1) 1 (1.8) 7 (13.5) a Events were graded according to NCI-CTC, version 2.. Maximum grade of event for each patient is collected. b Other histologies include large cell undifferentiated, bronchoalveolar, squamous, and other. c Source data are from the case report form. d Source data are from the case report form or from the NCI Adverse Event Expedited Reporting System or in both sources. e Grade 3 not reported for hematologic events. NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; NOS, not otherwise specified; PC, paclitaxel/carboplatin; PCB, paclitaxel/carboplatin bevacizumab; NCI-CTC, National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria. pemetrexed. It was speculated that the more favorable OS for adenocarcinoma was related to low thymidylate synthetase expression in nonsquamous cells, associated with more effective pemetrexed activity in nonsquamous carcinomas. 12,13 Thymidylate synthetase activity levels (in adenocarcinoma) have not been shown to correlate with antivascular endothelial growth factor activity. Any molecular or other mechanisms that would explain the adenocarcinoma survival advantage in this study remain speculative and beyond the scope of this assessment. The sample sizes of some histology subgroups are not large enough for definitive treatment comparisons to be made between these subgroups. Histologies documented in this study were per investigator and were not centrally assessed. This may present a limitation to this analysis and to other study analyses as well, because prior studies have documented the difficulties and inconsistencies with reporting of NOS histologies per investigator and central academic laboratory assessment, and there is a degree of heterogeneity within the NOS subgroup itself. 14,15 Patients with NSCLC of NOS histology have been reported to have poorer survival and response to treatments, 15 which may further confound this histology comparisons. Although the results of this retrospective analysis reinforce previous findings linking the inclusion of B in a combination therapy regimen to improvements in OS and PFS, conclusions are limited in the nonadenocarcinoma subtypes primarily because of low patient numbers. An ongoing large, observational cohort study is collecting histology and radiographic data from approximately 2 patients with different NSCLC tumor histologies who are being treated with B in combination with various chemotherapy regimens. 16 This study will permit further characterization of B treatment outcomes in NSCLC as they relate to histologies. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Supported, in part, by Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA. The authors thank the patients and their families, the E4599 Team, and Genentech Inc. for providing assistance with manuscript preparation. REFERENCES 1. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER), National Cancer Institute, 28. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/lungb. html. Accessed September 19, 28. 2. Govindan R, Page N, Morgensztern D, et al. Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 3 years: analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. J Clin Oncol 26;24:4539 4544. 3. Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, et al. Paclitaxel carboplatin alone or with, bevacizumab for non small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 26;355:2542 255. 4. Avastin (bevacizumab) [package insert]. South San Francisco, CA: Genentech Inc, 27. 5. Johnson DH, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny WF, et al. Randomized phase II trial comparing bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel with carboplatin and paclitaxel alone in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 24;22:2184 2191. 6. Sandler A. Bevacizumab in non small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 27;13(15 pt 2):s4613 s4616. 7. Einhorn LH. First-line chemotherapy for non small-cell lung cancer: is there a superior regimen based on histology? J Clin Oncol 28;26: 3485 3486. 8. Ruckdeschel JC, Finkelstein DM, Ettinger DS, et al. A randomized trial of, the four most active regimens for metastatic non small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1986;4:14 22. 9. Georgoulias V, Papadakis E, Alexopoulos A, et al. Platinum-based and non-platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 21;357:1478 1484. 1. Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemother- 1422 Copyright 21 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

Treatment Outcomes by Tumor Histology in ECOG Study apy-naïve patients with advanced-stage non small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28;28:3543 3551. 11. NCI programs: project expands group studies to community oncologists. The Oncologist News Bulletin. Oncologist 2;5:174 176. 12. Giovannetti E, Mey V, Nannizzi S, et al. Cellular and pharmacogenetics, foundation of synergistic interaction of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in human, non-small cell lung cancer cells. Mol Pharmacol 25;68:11 118. 13. Ceppi P, Volante M, Saviozzi S, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the lung compared with other histotypes shows higher messenger RNA and protein levels for thymidylate synthase. Cancer 26;17: 1589 1596. 14. Grilley-Olson JE, Hayes DN, Qaqish BF, et al. Diagnostic reproducibility of squamous cell carcinoma (SC) in the era of histology-directed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) chemotherapy: a large prospective study. J Clin Oncol 29;27:15s (suppl); abstract 88. 15. Ignatius S-H, Zell JA. Carcinoma NOS is a common histologic diagnosis and is increasing in proportion among non-small cell lung cancer histologies. J Thorac Oncol 29;4:122 1211. 16. Lynch T, Brahmer J, Fischbach N, et al. Preliminary treatment patterns and safety outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from ARIES, a bevacizumab treatment observational cohort study. J Clin Oncol 28;26:(suppl); abstract 877. Copyright 21 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer 1423