Cancer in Los Angeles County CANCER

Similar documents
USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANDY COHEN, MD, MPH SECRETARY

Columbus Affiliate of Susan G. Komen Quantitative Data Report

Mapping late-stage breast cancer rates for community-based cancer screening interventions

Greater Atlanta Affiliate of Susan G. Komen Quantitative Data Report

Fatal primary malignancy of brain. Glioblasatoma, histologically

Susan G. Komen Tri-Cities Quantitative Data Report

Incidence of Primary Liver Cancer in American Indians and Alaska Natives

Cancer in Los Angeles County:

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use and Breast Cancer Risk by Stage and Hormone Receptor Status

ADVANCING CANCER RESEARCH THROUGH A VIRTUAL POOLED REGISTRY. Dennis Deapen, DrPH NAACCR Annual Meeting June 16, 2015 Charlotte, NC

North Carolina Triangle to the Coast Affiliate of Susan G. Komen Quantitative Data Report

Quantitative Data: Measuring Breast Cancer Impact in Local Communities

This article shall be known, and may be cited as, the Newborn and Infant Hearing Screening, Tracking and Intervention Act.

New York State Department of Health Center for Environmental Health

County of Orange Health Care Agency, Public Health Services HIV/AIDS Surveillance and Monitoring Program

Presentation for DHSS 14 September Senior Statistician

Thyroid Cancer Investigation Update

Ethnic disparities in melanoma diagnosis and survival

CONSORT 2010 checklist of information to include when reporting a randomised trial*

Overview FLORIDA CANCER DATA SYSTEM

Brief Update on Cancer Occurrence in East Metro Communities

Spending estimates from Cancer Care Spending

Linking Oncotype Dx results to SEER data and patient report to assess challenges in individualizing breast cancer care

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 January 1.

Investigation of Ocular Melanoma Incidence, an Aggressive Form of Rare Tumor

Observational Study Designs. Review. Today. Measures of disease occurrence. Cohort Studies

Table of Contents. 2 P a g e. Susan G. Komen

Dear Applicant for Sober Living Environment Registration,

HEALTH EFFECTS OF PRESERVED WOOD: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CCA- TREATED WOOD AND INCIDENCE OF CANCER IN THE UNITED STATES. Daniel C.

State of California Health and Human Services Agency Department of Health Services

New Mexico Cancer Concerns Workgroup (Angela Meisner, M.P.H.)

Construction of a North American Cancer Survival Index to Measure Progress of Cancer Control Efforts

Health Risks Assessment A WHO perspective. Dr E. van Deventer

Surveillance and outbreak response are major components

SUPPORT FEDERAL FUNDING FOR PARKINSON S DISEASE RESEARCH AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT

Background - Registry. Background - ALS. Background - Epidemiology

Linkage of Indiana State Cancer Registry and Indiana Network for Patient Care

Table of Contents. 2 P age. Susan G. Komen

Planning a Community based Cancer Registry. Cancer Registration: Principles and Methods Edited by Jensen O. M. et al IARC 1991; pages

TARGETS To reduce the age-standardised mortality rate from cervical cancer in all New Zealand women to 3.5 per or less by the year 2005.

HIV Epidemiology. Annual Report San Francisco Department of Public Health Population Health Division

Changing Incidence of Hodgkin Lymphoma Histologic Subtypes: Risk Factor Trends or Evolving Diagnostic Practice?

CANCER INCIDENCE NEAR THE BROOKHAVEN LANDFILL

United Advocates for Children and Families. Stigma and Discrimination Reduction: Strategies for a Supportive Environment: Capacity Building

Leveraging the California Cancer Registry to Measure & Improve the Quality of Cancer Care

A post-psa Update on Trends in Prostate Cancer Incidence. Ann Hamilton and Myles Cockburn Keck School of Medicine, USC, Los Angeles

Rapid Case Ascertainment in Population and Hospital- Based Studies: Notes From the Field

CERCIT Workshop: Texas Cancer Registry; Medicaid; Registry Linked Claims Data

COMMUNITY PROFILE REPORT 2011 Northeast Ohio Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure

LCFA/IASLC LORI MONROE SCHOLARSHIP IN TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH 2017 REQUEST FOR APPLICATION (RFA)

Preparing For Pandemic Influenza: What the CDC and HHS Recommend You Can Do

State Health System Performance: A Detailed Look at the Lone Star State

Introduction and Purpose

S Congenital Heart Futures Act (Introduced in Senate - IS) 111th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 621 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES.

Geographic Variation of Advanced Stage Colorectal Cancer in California

Chapter 5: Epidemiology of MBC Challenges with Population-Based Statistics

Table of Contents. 2 P age. Susan G. Komen

Executive Summary. The Case for Data Linkage

Cancer Prevention and Control in Arkansas

County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services Public Health

Average Annual Age-Adjusted Cancer Incidence Rates, , at the Delaware Sub-County Level

First Interim Report to the European Commission DG-SANCO for: Grant Agreement No.: (790655) EAIS. December Annex 2

TITLE: Outcomes of Screening Mammography in Elderly Women

July, Years α : 7.7 / 10, Years α : 11 / 10,000 < 5 Years: 80 / 10, Reduce emergency department visits for asthma.

Table of Contents. 2 P age. Susan G. Komen

Using HIV Surveillance Laboratory Data to Identify Out-of-Care Patients

Cancer as a Disease. Linda D. Rego, CTR March 2009

Characteristics of Philadelphia Census Tracts with High Prostate Cancer Risk

CALIFORNIA CANCER REGISTRARS ASSOCIATION JOB BUREAU September Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center Burbank, CA

The Multiethnic Cohort Study: Studying Ethnic Diversity and Cancer. Laurence N. Kolonel, MD, PhD

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Performance Indicators for Foodborne Disease Programs

Melanoma Surveillance in the United States: Overview of Methods

Update on the NCI Cancer Centers Program Henry P. Ciolino, Ph.D. Director, Office of Cancer Centers

Surgical Management of Metastatic Colon Cancer: analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database

Identifying Geographic & Socioeconomic Disparities in Access to Care for Pediatric Cancer Patients in Texas

Neurofibromatosis (NF) Center

2018 Texas Cancer Registry Annual Report

Healthy Chicago Special Surveillance Report

TheSentinel. Reporting on Preparedness. District 2 Public Health (North) Emergency Preparedness Gainesville, Georgia. July 2009 Volume 7 Issue 4

The New CP 3 R Application And Revisions To Standard 4.6 Integration Of The NCDB With The Accreditation Process

Primary Health Care Initiatives (PHCI) Project Contract No. 278-C Abt. Associates Inc.

Paul Glassman DDS, MA, MBA Professor and Director of Community Oral Health University of the Pacific School of Dentistry San Francisco, CA

Two Decades of Evidenced-based Outcomes Research: The Erlangen Stroke Registry

Implementation and Evaluation of the I Choose Campaign to Promote Adult Immunization in South Los Angeles

Cancer in New Mexico 2017

Informatics and Data Analytics; How to make data meaningful? AHIMA World Congress Middle East Healthcare Information Summit October 2017

Diabetes Mellitus Registry Report. As Required By Health and Safety Code Section

Is There a Shortage of Dental Hygienists and Assistants in California?

California Comprehensive Addiction Recovery Act; Physical Capacity Expansion for Addiction Treatment

Southview Medical Center. Community Benefit Plan & Implementation Strategy

CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: The Parkinson s Institute Sunnyvale, California

Limited English Proficiency (LEP)

National Cancer Institute

National MS Society Information Sourcebook

Cancer Registrars: Beyond the Abstract

CLINICAL RESEARCH IN GEORGIA UPDATE. Nancy M. Paris, MS, FACHE President, Georgia CORE September 6, 2014

Transcription:

Cancer in Los Angeles County CANCER SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM BIBLIOGRAPHY 1972-2013 Prepared by Dennis Deapen, Dr.P.H. Lenard C. Berglund, D.M.A. LOS ANGELES CANCER SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA This report was produced by: Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program Department of Preventive Medicine University of Southern California 2001 N. Soto Street, mc 9238 Los Angeles, CA 90089-9238 (213) 342-2300 2014 Materials in this report are citations of individual publications protected by copyright.

TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements Introduction 1 Citations: By Anatomical Site 274 Citations: In Chronological Order

P ACKNOWLEDGMENTS opulation-based cancer registration in Los Angeles County was a vision of Brian E. Henderson, MD in 1969. He envisioned a rapid ascertainment and registration system in which the developing science of cancer epidemiology could achieve important research breakthroughs into the causes of human cancers. He recognized that the size and diversity of the Los Angeles County population would allow study of common as well as less common cancers, of persons of all ages and, of certain racial and ethnic groups in which little or no previous research findings were available. With a team which included Thomas M. Mack, MD, Malcolm Pike, PhD, Susan Preston- Martin, PhD, John Hisserich, PhD and a dedicated staff, data collection commenced later that same year and, by 1972, was essentially complete for the County. In addition to these persons, an epidemiologic research team was recruited and, just one year later, in 1973, five peer-reviewed articles were published in medical journals. As can be seen in this volume, the pace of research output has steadily increased to an average of one published research paper per day. The directors of the program over the 40 year period include Dr. Mack as well as Roland Phillips, MD, Ronald K. Ross, MD and currently, Dennis Deapen, DrPH. Other key leaders of the program over the years include Herman Menck, MBA, Judith Boone, Donna Morrell and Leslie Bernstein, PhD. Of course, all of these individuals must thank the many staff members of the program who have collected the information and assured its accuracy and completeness. Furthermore, cancer registrars representing hospitals across the county have contributed since 1987. But much of the hard work represented in this volume was performed by the many scientists whose names are listed. Each citation typically required years of work, from developing an hypothesis, writing a compelling research proposal, and collecting and analyzing the research data before the published report could be prepared. Again, without countless research staff persons, these projects could not have been conducted. The science of epidemiology is the study of patterns of disease among people. It is those people, persons diagnosed with cancer and, in many studies, our neighbors throughout Los Angeles County without cancer, who have willingly participated in these many research projects, giving their time to further our understanding of the causes and ways to prevent cancer. It is to these people, the participants in the research studies, that we dedicate this volume.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS THE CANCER T SURVEILLANCE he Cancer Surveillance Program PROGRAM FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY (CSP) is the population-based cancer registry for Los Angeles County and it identifies and obtains information on all incident (newly diagnosed) cancer patients within the geographic boundaries of the County. The registry was organized in 1970 and it operates within the administrative structure of the University of Southern California (USC) Keck School of Medicine and the USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center. The registry became essentially population-based by 1972, and complete incidence data for Los Angeles County are available from that year onward. To date, the CSP computerized database contains over 1,700,000 records, and more than 37,000 newly diagnosed cancer cases are added each year. Currently, funding for the registry is primarily shared by a contract from the Department of Public Health of the State of California, the National Cancer Institute s Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention s National Program of Cancer Registries. The CSP was initially developed with the voluntary cooperation of hospitals and other institutions, clinics and medical laboratories equipped to diagnose cancer in Los Angeles County. In 1987, the CSP became the regional registry for Los Angeles County for the new California Cancer Registry. The CSP is one of ten such regional registries providing, as a group, statewide coverage. In September 1992, the CSP became a SEER registry, the consortium of 17 population-based cancer registries which provides the federal government s National Cancer Institute with a snapshot of cancer incidence and survival across the United States. Uses of CSP Data for Research The CSP was originally developed as a resource for identifying patient populations for research on the causes of cancer; with the institution of the California Cancer Registry in the 1980 s the California legislature stated that the cancer registry data are to be used to determine the sources of malignant neoplasms and evaluate measures designed to eliminate, alleviate or ameliorate their effect. Thus, scientific research continues to be a prominent goal of the program. A high priority has always been placed on exploring demographic patterns and trends in cancer incidence among the racially and ethnically diverse population of Los Angeles County.

The CSP data serve as a descriptive epidemiological resource to generate new hypotheses regarding specific cancer sites or histologic subtypes, to monitor descriptive trends and patterns of cancer incidence, and to identify demographic subgroups at high risk of cancer. Many of the hypotheses tested in previous and ongoing case-control studies conducted by cancer epidemiologists affiliated with the CSP have arisen from these descriptive epidemiological studies. Another important function of the CSP is to provide communitywide or hospital-specific data on cancer occurrence as a service to the community. The other most important use of the CSP for research purposes has been to generate rosters of cancer patients who are eligible for research studies. Since 1973, we estimate that over 60,000 cancer patients have been contacted after having been found eligible to participate in one of many case-control studies being conducted at any given time. In such studies, additional information about each of these patients is gathered by personal interview, record abstraction, or by the processing of laboratory specimens. The results are then compared with similar information gathered from healthy persons (controls), who have been chosen to represent the population from which the cases came. The CSP receives occasional requests from community physicians or from the County and State Health Departments seeking assistance in investigating perceived cancer risks from environmental exposures. Usually these requests are based on apparent clustering of cancer cases in a short time period and in a defined geographic area. A routine examination of the pertinent CSP data can usually evaluate the magnitude of the risk in relation to an appropriate comparison group in the County. Finally, the CSP is used for analytic studies of the cohort design. In such studies, a large roster of Los Angeles residents who have had in common a particular exposure of public health interest (e.g., an occupational exposure or a specific medical treatment) are matched to the CSP registry of cases in order to see whether or not an excess of cancer cases has appeared among them. The CSP has been the most productive cancer registry in the world during the past few decades, in terms of scientific contributions toward understanding the demographic patterns and the etiology of specific cancers, as illustrated by this bibliography of more than 2600 publications contributed to scientific journals. Protection of Confidentiality All reports and summaries produced for distribution by the CSP, such as those presented here, are in statistical form, without any personal identifying information. All individual studies using confidential information obtained from the registry are individually reviewed by the USC Institutional Review Board (or, for studies from outside investigators, by another federally approved institutional review board), as is the registry itself on a regular basis.