New CTA PSAP Quality Standard (Starting with Some Interesting Questions)

Similar documents
Technical Topics. Where did my gain go? Thin Tube Open Fit BTE Verification. History of Thin Tubes: Summary of presentation by C. Staples and S.

Hearing Protection: A Look at Some Tradeoffs Protection Detection Localization Speech Intelligibility JDVAC

NOTICE. (Formulated under the cognizance of the CTA R6 Portable, Handheld and In-Vehicle Electronics Committee.)

The Benefits of Bimodal Hearing for Adults and Children: Effect of Frequency Region and Acoustic Bandwidth René H. Gifford, PhD

Suitcase Lab Measurement of Digital Cellphone Interference Levels on Hearing Aids

Top 10 ideer til en god høreapparat tilpasning. Astrid Haastrup, Audiologist GN ReSound

Hearing Solutions Catalog Winter Supplement January 2009

Importance of a Good Start. Topics. Rationale. In-Situ Audiometry. In-Situ Audiometry. Enhancing the Initial

The Effect of Analysis Methods and Input Signal Characteristics on Hearing Aid Measurements

Flip Specification Guide. flip your expectations

Paediatric Amplification

Are hearing aids the better rehabilitative choice when compared to PSAPs? On speech-intelligibility and soundquality,

Building Practice Success Through Speechmap Real Ear Measurements. Chris Stokes-Rees

Fitting Decisions and their Impact on Hearing Aid User Benefit. Mallory Maine, AuD Audiologist, GN ReSound

Otolens Invisible In Canal Hearing Aids

Abstract.

pep Step up with pep Pep Specification Guide _Pep_Specification_Guide_UK.indd 1

The Devil is in the Fitting Details. What they share in common 8/23/2012 NAL NL2

EXPECT More from Oticon AGIL. a new survey proves it!

What Parents Should Know About Hearing Aids: What s Inside, How They Work, & What s Best for Kids

ERO SCAN. Otoacoustic Emission Testing

An assessment of the validity of a subjective hearing aid verification procedure

보청기의전기음향적성능분석. Kyoung Won Lee, Ph.D Hallym University of Graduate Studies

OTC Hearing Aid Activity U.S.A.

Evidence base for hearing aid features:

Topics in Amplification DYNAMIC NOISE MANAGEMENT TM A WINNING TEAM

ipod Noise Exposure Assessment in Simulated Environmental Conditions

WIDEXPRESS. no.30. Background

Music. listening with hearing aids

WIDEXPRESS THE WIDEX FITTING RATIONALE FOR EVOKE MARCH 2018 ISSUE NO. 38

Turn up the volume on life. The powerful choice for your super power users

Two Modified IEC Ear Simulators for Extended Dynamic Range

personalization meets innov ation

Testing Digital Hearing Aids

Welcome to the LISTEN G.R.A.S. Headphone and Headset Measurement Seminar The challenge of testing today s headphones USA

Elements of Effective Hearing Aid Performance (2004) Edgar Villchur Feb 2004 HearingOnline

Product Portfolio Supplement

C H A N N E L S A N D B A N D S A C T I V E N O I S E C O N T R O L 2

International Hearing Society Middlebelt Rd., Ste. 4 Livonia, MI p f

Oticon Safari 900, 600 and 300

Wireless Technology - Improving Signal to Noise Ratio for Children in Challenging Situations

Max. Powered by Era. Hearing matters

Issues faced by people with a Sensorineural Hearing Loss

FREQUENCY COMPRESSION AND FREQUENCY SHIFTING FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED

Prescribe hearing aids to:

The Use of a High Frequency Emphasis Microphone for Musicians Published on Monday, 09 February :50

INTRODUCTION TO PURE (AUDIOMETER & TESTING ENVIRONMENT) TONE AUDIOMETERY. By Mrs. Wedad Alhudaib with many thanks to Mrs.

AQ CO THE NEW DYNAMICS OF HEARING

Validation Studies. How well does this work??? Speech perception (e.g., Erber & Witt 1977) Early Development... History of the DSL Method

Institute of Medicine (IOM) Consensus Study on Accessible and Affordable Hearing Health Care for Adults

Why? Speech in Noise + Hearing Aids = Problems in Noise. Recall: Two things we must do for hearing loss: Directional Mics & Digital Noise Reduction

Bone conduction hearing solutions from Sophono

Audiogram+: The ReSound Proprietary Fitting Algorithm

Technical Data. Orion RIC. usa.siemens.com/hearing. Life sounds brilliant. Description. Standard Features

3M Center for Hearing Conservation

Power Instruments, Power sources: Trends and Drivers. Steve Armstrong September 2015

Beltone Electronics 2601 Patriot Boulevard Glenview, IL U.S.A. (800)

User Guide. For Jacoti Hearing Center Version 1.1. Manufacture Year 2016

2/16/2012. Fitting Current Amplification Technology on Infants and Children. Preselection Issues & Procedures

Evidence-based Design Leads to Remote Microphone Hearing Instrument Technology

Over the Counter Hearing Aids:

Testing FM Systems on the 7000 Hearing Aid Test System

HyperFit Desktop Fitting Guide Supplemental Instructions for the HyperSound Tinnitus Module

FONIX FP35. Ease and Accuracy with the FP35 Touch Hearing Aid Analyzer! Visible Speech

Reprogramming My Bernafon Juna 9 Aids for Music

Step-by-Step RECD Guide

Quick Guide Binaural REM

MORE SOUND THAN EVER

AND9020/D. Adaptive Feedback Cancellation 3 from ON Semiconductor APPLICATION NOTE INTRODUCTION

OAE Test System. Screener PLUS. Diagnostic PLUS. with 4 frequency DPOAE testing Protocols

UNITY 2. a state-of-the-art audiological integrated diagnostic and fitting system

Intended Use Adjusting to the BEAN

! Caution (continued)

Counseling Patients on Fitting Options. Michael Valente

DREAM feature and product Quick guide

Optimising Outcomes for Speech Mapping

Single channel noise reduction in hearing aids

Can you hear me now? Amanda Wolfe, Au.D. Examining speech intelligibility differences between bilateral and unilateral telephone listening conditions

Clinical fitting guide

Satisfaction Survey. Oticon Intiga gets it right with first-time users

Noise reduction in modern hearing aids long-term average gain measurements using speech

binax fit: How it s simulated in Connexx, how to verify it, and how to match-to-target the easy way

DSL v5 in Connexx 7 Mikael Menard, Ph.D., Philippe Lantin Sivantos, 2015.

The historically low hearing aid adoption

Verifying the Lyric Audibility Advantage

For hearing aid noise reduction, babble is not just babble

CLASSROOM AMPLIFICATION: WHO CARES? AND WHY SHOULD WE? James Blair and Jeffery Larsen Utah State University ASHA, San Diego, 2011

Adaptive Feedback Cancellation for the RHYTHM R3920 from ON Semiconductor

Research Article The Acoustic and Peceptual Effects of Series and Parallel Processing

Technical Data Insio micon TM

ELECTROACOUSTIC EVALUATION OF THE RESOUND UNITE MINI MICROPHONE WITH OTOMETRICS AURICAL HIT

Hearing Aids and Assistive Listening Devices

Digital hearing aids are still

AccuQuest Spotlight: Successful Fittings with Oasis. Fitting Range

Technical Data. Nitro micon Customs (7/3mi) usa.siemens.com/hearing. Life sounds brilliant. Standard Features. Description.

OIML R 122 Annex C RECOMMENDATION. Edition 1999 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION

Acoustic and Electric Same Ear Hearing in Patients with a Standard Electrode Array

Adapting Villchur s loudspeaker-copying-loudspeaker demonstrations to earphones

ERO SCAN. OAE Test System. Screener. Diagnostic. with 4 frequency DPOAE testing Protocols

Transcription:

New CTA PSAP Quality Standard (Starting with Some Interesting Questions) Mead C. Killion, PhD, ScD(hon) & Gail Gudmundsen, AuD Etymotic Research, Inc. ADA Audacity Conference San Diego 2016 11 12 1. What evidence do you have that PSAP aids that meet the new CTA PSAP performance standards will be satisfactory? In other words, can a CTA Seal of Approval assure that buyers will be satisfied? No 2. Do you think PSAPs will be good for audiologists and hearing instrument specialists? Sweetow: That is the wrong question 3. Do you expect satisfaction with a pair of PSAP or OTC hearing aids to approach that of hearing aids fitted by a professional? No 4. What is the return for credit rate for Etymotic s BEAN personal sound amplifiers? About the same as reported for the bottom half of professionals, who do not use best practices

BACKGROUND REMARKS #1 There is a natural aging process that if you live long enough produces saggy skin and hearing loss. Neither is usually a medical problem which can be cured by a doctor. #2 It is not good for someone with hearing loss to go without amplification, yet by one NU Kellogg Institute study, 55% of those who see a professional leave with nothing. Advice and #3 There are people who could benefit from conventional hearing aids but can t afford them. a) 45 million in our country live below the poverty line; b) only 4% of the Hispanic population in Arizona with hearing loss get hearing aids.

In addition, we are faced with double the number of people needing amplification, with no increase in the number of hearing professionals. There will be plenty of people who can afford the best. We should be kind to those who can t. Zapala,Dhar etal. (2015 IOM) DISEASE RISK MANAGEMENT

For all of those reasons, Both PCAST and NAS (IOM) recently recommended that we permit over the counter hearing aids The Warren Grassley Senate Bill just submitted further requires that FDA remover the normal hearing restriction on Personal Sound Amplifier Products (PSAPs) and would over ride the restrictions in all 50 states.

CTA PSAP Quality Standard (draft) Update on the CTA PSAP Performance Standard

CTA PSAP Quality Standard (draft) Why Did the Consumer Technology Association form The PSAP Quality Standard Committee? To provide consumers with a Good Houskeeping Seal of Approval for personal sound amplifiers that meet the requirements of the standard. The task was challenging, because existing hearing aid standards describe how to measure hearing aids, but are completely silent on what they should do. The CTA PSAP Committee includes representatives from manufacturers, test labs, & other industry organizations.

CTA PSAP Quality Standard (draft) Three Levels of Performance Reporting Level 1: Performance Required (Results must be reported) Example: Minimum Bandwidth Level 2: Measurement Required (Results must be reported) Example: Battery life Level 3: Features and Options List (No requirements) Example: Multiband Compression 7

CTA PSAP Quality Standard (draft) Level 1 Criteria Performance Measurement Limits: Bandwidth: Standard > 5 khz)(91-94% speech cues) & Wideband > 10 khz(music) Frequency response smoothness (no response peak >10dB) Distortion limits for input & output Maximum acoustic output: 115 dba sound-field equivalent Self-generated noise: 30 dba maximum, referred to input(10 db HL) Latency maximum: 15 ms (acoustic input to output) Level 2 Criterion Measure & Report Value: Battery life Level 3 Criteria Features (Identified): Noise reduction SNR enhancement (directionality) Automatic gain and/or tone control Feedback control/cancellation Personalization Ear canal open or closed 8

4.1 BANDWIDTH Example FAIL!

Example FAIL!

Conversion Tables are provided that allow use of Standard 2cc coupler or Ear Simulator measurements Ex: Proposed Maximum Allowable output is 115 dba SPL referred to the sound field, Table 4.5A allows correction of 2cc coupler values to Awt sound field SPLs Note: The maximum correction between 500 and 8000 Hz subtracts 5.4 db at 2500 Hz. At that frequency, a 2 cc coupler maximum SPL of 121 db would fail the proposed standard. 11

APPLICATION EXAMPLES A year ago, the European Association of Hearing Aid Professionals provided data on 27 Personal Sound Amplifiers on the market in Europe A quick look at their data showed that none of these 27 devices would pass even the first three of the proposed CTA PSAP Standard requirements. I m going to go quickly over them. If you want to download this ppt for more careful study, email customerservice @etymotic.com, put ADA talk in the subject line. You ll receive the Dropbox url. 12

Reasons for failing draft CTA standard BW MO 13

Reasons for failing draft CTA standard BW MO PK MO 14

Reasons for failing draft CTA standard PK MO 15

Reasons for failing draft CTA standard 16

Reasons for failing draft CTA standard PK MO 17

Reasons for failing draft CTA standard BW MO BW MO BW MO 18

Reasons for failing draft CTA standard MO BW MO BW MO BW MO 19

In contrast to all those devices that fail There are PSAPs (in the US) that do pass these tests Peak = 3 db BW = 6.3 khz MO = 113dB Sound World Solutions CS50+ 17

Another pass: For one device, independent research has shown nearly as good speech intelligibility performance in quiet and in noise as digital hearing aids individually fitted to NAL NL2 (Walter Reed) Peak = 3 db BW = 16 khz Wideband MO = 110dB 2 CC Coupler Responses H N 21

There has been a great deal of concern about the quality of PSAPs. What about hearing aids?

Short A B A = open ear B = Digital aid

In early fidelity rating experiments, we used a string quartet from the Chicago Symphony. I even got to play on Dvorak s American Quartet. We later found a simpler (and less expensive) method that gave similar ratings.

KEMAR THE PIANO PLAYER A Open Ear B New Digital Aid Q A B: Boogie

PSAP Example : High Fidelity BEAN Personal Sound Amplifier with a 16 khz BW A B: Open Ear vs. BEAN PSAP

CTA PSAP Quality Standard (draft) Two Conclusions and a Recommendation Draft standard appears to fail and pass devices appropriately The standard will enable consumers to identify products with reasonable quality Recommend: the FDA relax guidelines to allow these devices to be sold and marketed realistically Thank you! Not to mention that if you treat someone really well, you will have a customer for life. Gail has had patients track her down 15 years after she stopped practing. 27