Faculty/Presenter Disclosure

Similar documents
CORONARY: The Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery Off or On Pump Revascularization Study. Results at 1 Year

Randomized comparison of single versus double mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 5 year outcomes of the Arterial Revascularization Trial

On-Pump vs. Off-Pump CABG: The Controversy Continues. Miguel Sousa Uva Immediate Past President European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery

Declaration of conflict of interest NONE

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Diabetics: All Arterial or Hybrid?

EXCEL vs. NOBLE: How to Treat Left Main Disease in 2017 AATS International Cardiovascular Symposium December 8-9, 2017

1. Whether the risks of stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) differ from BMS and DES

Disclosures The PREVENT IV Trial was supported by Corgentech and Bristol-Myers Squibb

Supplement materials:

Trial of Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Coronary Disease (BEST Trial)

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

GRAND ROUNDS - DILEMMAS IN ANTICOAGULATION AND ANTIPLATELET THERAPY. Nick Collins February 2017

TRIAL UPDATE 1. ISAR TRIPLE SECURITY Trial. Dr Deven Patel Royal Free Hospital

Version 4.4. Institutional Outcomes Report 2014Q3. National Outcomes Report Aggregation Date: Jan 12, :59:59 PM

Use of Acute Kidney Injury Biomarkers in Clinical Trials

Use of Acute Kidney Injury Biomarkers in Clinical Trials

Left Main Disease: what is left to surgery? Prof. Jacques Monségu CardioVascular Institute Grenoble, France

Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting at 30 Days

Emergency surgery in acute coronary syndrome

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATO trial

Coronary Artery Stenosis. Insight from MAIN-COMPARE Study

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

EACTS Adult Cardiac Database

Efficacy and Safety of a Dual Ticagrelor plus Aspirin Antiplatelet Strategy after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The DACAB Randomized Clinical Trial

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Culprit PCI vs MultiVessel PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction

CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial)

Abciximab plus Heparin versus Bivalirudin in Patients with NSTEMI Undergoing PCI. ISAR-REACT 4 Trial

Ischemic Heart Disease Interventional Treatment

Paris, August 28 th Gian Paolo Ussia on behalf of the CoreValve Italian Registry Investigators

Lésions du tronc commun: Reste t il une place pour la chirugie? Pierre Deharo, CHU TIMONE, Marseille

Surgical vs. Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome

ICSS Safety Results NOT for PUBLICATION. June 2009 ICSS ICSS ICSS ICSS. International Carotid Stenting Study: Main Inclusion Criteria

The Second Best Arterial Graft:

Incremental Value of Multiple Arterial conduits in CABG

Revascularization after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation or Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease

Can Angiographic Complete Revascularization Improve Outcomes for Patients with Decreased LV Function? NO!

Supplement Table 1. Definitions for Causes of Death

Recognizing the High Risk NSTEMI Patient for Early Appropriate Therapy

SURGICAL MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION: ARTERIAL VS VENOUS GRAFTS, SINGLE VS MULTIPLE GRAFTS?

Supplementary Online Content

'Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndromes: perioperative strategies to improve outcome'

Rationale for Prophylactic Support During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial)

Adults With Diagnosed Diabetes

PCI vs. CABG From BARI to Syntax, Is The Game Over?

Patient characteristics Intervention Comparison Length of followup

Ischemic Heart Disease Interventional Treatment

Implications of the New ESC/EACTS Guidelines for Myocardial Revascularization in 2011

To provide information on the use of acetyl salicylic acid in the treatment and prevention of vascular events.

Catheter-based mitral valve repair MitraClip System

Current outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: evidence from real world practice

HIP ATTACK Trial: Can we improve outcomes after a hip fracture with accelerated surgery? PJ Devereaux, MD, PhD

Transfusion triggers in acute coronary syndromes: The MINT trial

Secular Trends in Cardiovascular Disease in Kidney Transplant Recipients: 1994 to 2009

Unprotected LM intervention

PRASUGREL HYDROCHLORIDE (Effient Eli Lilly Canada Inc.) Indication: Acute Coronary Syndrome

Management of High-Risk CAD : Surgeons Perspective

LOW RISK TAVR. WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS

Management of cardiovascular disease - coronary interventions -

Robotic Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

Diagnostic, Technical and Medical

OPCAB IS NOT BETTER THAN CONVENTIONAL CABG

TICAGRELOR VERSUS CLOPIDOGREL AFTER THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ST- ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

PTCA 1979: : I

Is there enough evidence for DAPT after endovascular intervention for PAOD?

INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE

FFR and CABG Emanuele Barbato, MD, PhD, FESC Cardiovascular Center Aalst, Belgium

The top 5 trials in the last year: Ischemic Heart Disease

Surgical AVR: Are there any contraindications? Pyowon Park Samsung Medical Center Seoul, Korea

AF stroke prevention in the Canadian context

The ACCELERATE Trial

UPDATES FROM THE 2018 ANTIPLATELET GUIDELINES

8/28/2018. Pre-op Evaluation for non cardiac surgery. A quick review from 2007!! Disclosures. John Steuter, MD. None

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinically Significant Bleeding with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in ACS

Preoperative Anemia versus Blood Transfusion: Which is the Culprit for Worse Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery?

Alfa Ferry FRCS Cardiac Surgeon OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT IN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE

Minimally Invasive Stand Alone Cox-Maze Procedure For Patients With Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Does the Use of Ultrafiltration Increase the Risk of Post-Operative Acute Kidney Injury? A Multi-Center Analysis

HREVS: A Randomized Trial of PCI vs CABG vs Hybrid Revascularization in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Vladimir Ganyukov, MD, PhD

COAGULATION, BLEEDING, AND TRANSFUSION IN URGENT AND EMERGENCY CORONARY SURGERY

Coronary Revascularization Rates in Ontario: Which rate is right?

VCU Pauley Heart Center: A 2009 US News Top 50 Heart and Heart Surgery Hospital

Disclosures. Dr. Scirica has also served as a consultant for Lexicon, Arena, Gilead, and Eisai.

Count Down to COMBAT

Zachary I. Hodes, M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.C.

The MAIN-COMPARE Registry

Using DOACs in CAD Patients in Sinus Ryhthm Results of the ATLAS ACS 2, COMPASS and COMMANDER-HF Trials

Which drug do you prefer for stable CAD? - P2Y12 inhibitor

STEMI update. Vijay Krishnamoorthy M.D. Interventional Cardiology

DOUBLE or TRIPLE ANTI-TROMBOTIC THERAPY in ACS. Maarten L Simoons Thoraxcenter - Erasmus MC Rotterdam - The Netherlands

OUTPATIENT ANTITHROMBOTIC MANAGEMENT POST NON-ST ELEVATION ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME. TARGET AUDIENCE: All Canadian health care professionals.

Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD

STATINS EVALUATION IN CORONARY PROCEDURES AND REVASCULARIZATION

An introduction to Quality by Design. Dr Martin Landray University of Oxford

CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT (CABG) MEASURES GROUP OVERVIEW

CPORT E Trial. Atlantic C PORT

Antiplatelet Therapy in Primary CVD Prevention and Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Καρακώστας Γεώργιος Διευθυντής Καρδιολογικής Κλινικής, Γ.Ν.

ANZSCTS Cardiac Surgery Database Program ANNUAL REPORT ANZSCTS National Report 2015 Page 1

Transcription:

Faculty/Presenter Disclosure Faculty: Andre Lamy Relationships with commercial interests: Grants/Research Support: None Speakers Bureau/Honoraria: None Consulting Fees: None Other: None

CORONARY: The Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery Off or On Pump Revascularization Study André Lamy Population Health Research Institute Hamilton Health Sciences McMaster University Hamilton, CANADA on behalf of the CORONARY Investigators

Disclosure No conflict of interest for all co-authors Presented on behalf of the CORONARY Investigators 3

Background Benefits and risks of performing CABG surgery on beating heart (off pump) not clearly established. Majority of prior trials had few events and short follow-up or inexperienced surgeons. 4

CORONARY Trial Organization 79 centers in 19 countries 4,752 patients recruited between (November 2006 October 2011) Designed, coordinated, managed and data analysed and reported by the Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada The data was monitored by independent DSMB Funded by Canadian Institutes of Health Research 5

Study Hypotheses - Off pump CABG compared to on-pump CABG would reduce major clinical events in shortterm (30 Days) - Benefits maintained in long-term (5 yrs) 6

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Inclusion Criteria Isolated CABG with median sternotomy One of the following: 1. Peripheral vascular disease 2. Cerebrovascular disease 3. Renal Insufficiency 4. Age 70 years 5. Age 60-69 with at least one risk factor (diabetes, urgent revascularization, smoker, LVEF 35) 6. Age 55-59 with at least two of the above risk factors Exclusions Additional cardiac procedure planned Contraindications to off-pump or on-pump CABG Emergency or re-do CABG 7

Qualifications of Surgeons Surgical expertise-based randomization > 2 years of experience as staff cardiac surgeon and > 100 cases of one or both techniques Trainees were not allowed to be primary operators 8

Primary Outcomes 1 st Co-Primary Outcome Composite of total mortality, stroke, non fatal myocardial infarction, new renal failure at 30 days post randomization NEJM NEJM 30 days: presented ACC.12 and 1 Year: presented ACC.13 and 2 nd Co-Primary Outcome Composite of above outcomes plus repeat coronary revascularization over 5 yrs of follow-up (expected 9

Baseline Characteristics OFF-PUMP (n = 2375) ON-PUMP (n = 2377) Mean Age (years) 67.6 67.5 Males () 80.0 81.7 Prior MI 33.8 35.2 Previous Stroke 6.7 7.8 Peripheral Arterial Disease 8.0 8.2 Congestive Heart Failure 5.9 6.6 Urgent Surgery 39.5 38.1 Euroscore 0 2 3 5 > 5 28.6 51.7 18.1 27.8 54.2 16.8 10

Baseline Disease Pre-op Angiogram OFF-PUMP (n = 2375) ON-PUMP (n = 2377) Left Main 22.1 20.9 Triple Vessel 56.1 60.4 Double Vessel 18.7 16.4 Single Vessel 3.0 2.1 11

Operation Details 4752 Randomized (ITT Analyses) CABG 30 days Off Pump 2148 (90.4) On Pump 2183(91.8 ) Cross-overs 184 (7.8) 150 (6.4) Incomplete revascularization Operating room (median hrs) Initial ventilation (median hrs) Off Pump On Pump 11.8 10.0 1.18 RR 95 CI p value 1.00-1.3 9 0.05 4.0 4.2 <0.001 9.6 11.2 <0.001 12

Conduits OFF-PUMP (n = 2375) ON-PUMP (n = 2377) p-value n n CABG Completed 2349 98.9 2356 99.1 Total grafts performed CONDUIT 3.0 3.2 <0.001 LIMA or RIMA 2199 93.6 2201 93.4 0.788 Saphenous Vein 2028 86.3 2117 89.9 <0.001 13

Peri-operative Transfusions and Bleeding OFF-PUMP (n = 2375) ON-PUMP (n = 2377) p value Any Blood Transfusion 50.7 63.3 <0.001 Antifibrinolytics 26.1 37.0 <0.001 Re-operation for bleeding 1.4 2.4 0.02 14

1 st Co-Primary Outcome (30 Days) Primary Outcome Death, Stroke, MI, Renal Failure Off Pump On Pump Hazard Ratio 95 CI p value 9.8 10.3 0.95 0.79-1.14 0.59 15

1 st Co-Primary Outcome (30 Days) Primary Outcome Death, Stroke, MI, Renal Failure Components Off Pump On Pump Hazard Ratio 95 CI p value 9.8 10.3 0.95 0.79-1.14 0.59 Death 2.5 2.5 1.02 0.71-1.46 Stroke 1.0 1.1 0.89 0.51-1.54 Non Fatal MI 6.7 7.2 0.93 0.75-1.15 New Renal Failure 1.2 1.1 1.04 0.61-1.76 16

Death/MI/Stroke/New Renal Failure at 30 Days Cumulative Event Rate # at Risk OFF ON 0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 HR 0.95 95 CI 0.79-1.14 p value 0.59 Off Pump On Pump 0 10 Days of Follow-up 20 30 2375 2176 2151 2142 2377 2178 2146 2133 17

Other Outcomes at 30 days Off Pump On Pump Hazard Ratio 95 CI p value Angina 0.1 0.1 1.50 0.25-8.99 0.66 PCI 0.5 0.1 3.67 1.02-13.2 0.05 Re-do CABG 0.2 0.04 6.00 0.72-49.8 0.01 PCI/Re-do CABG 0.7 0.2 4.01 1.34-12.0 0.01 All re-operations (re-do CABG) All re-operations/re-do CABG/PCI 3.3 3.9 0.85 0.63-1.14 0.27 3.7 4.0 0.94 0.70-1.25 0.65 18

Other Outcomes at 30 days Off Pump On Pump Relative Risk 95 CI p value Respiratory Infection or failure 5.9 7.5 0.79 0.63-0.9 8 0.03 Acute Kidney Injury AKIN Stage 1 28.0 32.1 0.87 0.80-0.96 0.01 RIFLE risk 17.0 19.6 0.87 0.76-0.98 0.02 New Renal Failure requiring Dialysis 1.2 1.1 1.04 0.61-1.76 0.77 Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN): absolute increase in serum creatinine value 27 µmol/l OR an increase of 150 from the baseline serum creatinine value Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss and End-stage Renal Disease (RIFLE): increase of 150 from the baseline serum creatinine value 19

Primary Outcome at Hospital Discharge Tertiary Outcome Death/MI/Stroke/Renal Failure Off Pump On Pump Hazar d Ratio 95 CI p value 9.6 10.4 0.94 0.78-1.13 0.50 Components Death 2.6 2.8 0.97 0.68-1.37 Stroke 0.9 1.0 0.94 0.52-1.69 Non Fatal MI 6.7 7.2 0.93 0.75-1.15 New Renal Failure 1.2 1.1 1.11 0.65-1.87 20

Subgroups (1) 21

Subgroups (2) 22

Conclusions At 30 days there was no difference in the primary outcome between Off pump CABG and On pump CABG. Off-pump was associated with: Less transfusions and re-operation for bleeding Less acute kidney injury Less respiratory infections/failure More early revascularizations 23

Subgroups (2) 24

Results by Region EuroSCO RE OFF-PUMP ON-PUMP Hazard Ratio p value 0.058 South America 4.21 10.6 15.3 0.68 0.05 North America + Europe + Australia 4.27 10.8 12.2 0.89 0.39 China 3.44 7.4 6.7 1.12 0.69 India 3.21 9.3 6.7 1.41 0.09 25

Primary outcome per EuroSCORE 15 HR 1.35 HR 0.87 HR 0.85 12 Primary Outcome () 9 6 3 0 Off-pump On-pump Off-pump On-pump Off-pump On-pump 0-2 3 to 5 >5 P=0.047 EuroSCORE

Primary Outcome per EuroSCORE 15 Primary Outcome () 12 9 6 3 ON-PUMP 0 0-2 3 4 to 5 6 + EuroSCORE 27

Primary Outcome per EuroSCORE 15 Primary Outcome () 12 9 6 3 OFF-PUMP 0 0-2 3 4 to 5 6 + EuroSCORE 28

Primary Outcome per EuroSCORE 15 Primary Outcome () 12 9 6 3 0 OFF-PUMP ON-PUMP 0-2 3 4 to 5 6 + EuroSCORE

Hazard Ratio 1.5 Hazard Ratio Off-pump/On-pump 1.0 0.5 0 0-2 3 4 to 5 6 + EuroSCORE 30

Hazard Ratio 1.5 Hazard Ratio Off-pump/On-pump 1.0 ROOBY CORONARY GOPCAB E 0.5 0 0-2 3 4 to 5 6 + EuroSCORE 31

Results by Region adjusted by EuroSCORE Eurosco re OFF-PUMP ON- PUMP HR 95 CI p value South America 0-2 13.3 15.2 0.89 0.40-1.96 0.77 3+ 10.0 15.5 0.63 0.40-1.00 0.05 North America + Europe + Australia 0-2 8.3 7.0 1.20 0.57-2.54 0.63 3+ 11.4 13.5 0.84 0.63-1.13 0.26 India 0-2 8.5 6.0 1.43 0.74-2.77 0.29 3+ 9.9 7.2 1.40 0.86-2.27 0.17 China 0-2 8.6 3.5 2.50 0.88-7.12 0.09 3+ 6.8 8.5 0.79 0.42-1.50 0.47 32

Conclusions No variations of results per regions after adjustment by EuroSCORE Moderate and high risk patients tend to benefit from Off-pump technique compared to Onpump Reverse is seen in low-risk patients 33

1 st Co-Primary Outcome (1 Year) Primary Outcome Death, Stroke, MI, Renal Failure Components Off Pump On Pump Hazard Ratio 95 CI p value 12.1 13.3 0.91 0.77-1.07 0.24 Death 5.1 5.0 1.03 0.8-1.32 Stroke 1.5 1.7 0.90 0.57-1.41 Non Fatal MI 6.8 7.5 0.90 0.73-1.12 New Renal Failure 1.3 1.3 0.97 0.59-1.60 34

Other Outcomes at 1 Year Off Pump On Pump Hazard Ratio 95 CI p value Angina 1.0 0.9 1.05 0.58-1.88 0.87 PCI 1.1 0.8 1.43 0.79-2.57 0.23 Re-do CABG 0.3 0.01 7.00 0.86-57.0 0.07 PCI/Re-do CABG 1.4 0.8 1.66 0.95-2.89 0.07 Primary outcome per protocol 11.5 13.2 0.86 0.73-1.02 0.08 35

Death/MI/Stroke/New Renal Failure at 1 Year Primary Outcome () P=0.25 Months

Conclusions At 1 year there was no difference between Off-pump CABG and On-pump CABG: In the primary outcome Repeat revascularization Quality of life Neuro-cognitive function 37

38

39

1 st Co-Primary Outcome (30 Days) (830 patients) Primary Outcome Death, Stroke, MI, Renal Failure Components Off Pump On Pump Hazard Ratio 95 CI p value 9.2 13.7 0.66 0.44-1.00 0.049 Death 1.4 1.4 1.01 0.33-3.13 0.98 Stroke 1.2 1.7 0.72 0.23-2.27 0.57 Non Fatal MI 7.5 10.6 0.70 0.44-1.11 0.13 New Renal Failure 0.2 1.0 0.25 0.03-2.25 0.22 * Not a pre-specified sub-group 40

1 st Co-Primary Outcome (Discharge) (830 patients) Primary Outcome Death, Stroke, MI, Renal Failure Components Off Pump On Pump Hazard Ratio 95 CI p value 9.0 13.9 0.65 0.43-0.98 0.040 Death 1.4 2.6 0.64 0.23-1.78 0.40 Stroke 1.0 1.4 0.72 0.20-2.57 0.62 Non Fatal MI 7.5 10.6 0.72 0.45-1.14 0.16 New Renal Failure 0.2 1.0 0.26 0.03-2.34 0.23 41

Other Outcomes at 30 days Off Pump On Pump Hazard Ratio 95 CI Blood transfusions 31.2 45.0 0.70 0.57-0.84 AKI (stage 1) 16.5 26.9 0.61 0.45-0.83 p value <0.00 1 <0.00 1 Re-hospitalization 8.2 11.8 0.70 0.46-1.06 0.09 PCI 0.5 0.2 2.02 0.18-22.3 0.56 Re-do CABG 0 0 1.00 - - Re-operations 1.9 3.6 0.54 0.23-1.25 0.15 All re-operations/re-do CABG/PCI 2.2 3.6 0.61 0.27-1.36 0.23 42

1 st Co-Primary Outcome (30 days to 1 Year) (830 Off Pump # pts patients) On Pump #pts Hazard Ratio 95 CI p value Primary Outcome Death, Stroke, MI, Renal Failure 6 9 0.64 Components Death 4 6 0.64 Stroke 1 1 0.96 Non Fatal MI 2 2 0.95 New Renal Failure 0 1 0.28 PCI 6 2 2.88 Re-do CABG 0 0 1.00 43

1 st Co-Primary Outcome (1 Year) (830 patients) Primary Outcome Death, Stroke, MI, Renal Failure Components Off Pump On Pump Hazard Ratio 95 CI p value 10.5 16.3 0.63 0.43-0.93 0.019 Death 3.4 4.1 0.83 0.41-1.68 0.60 Stroke 1.5 2.0 0.76 0.26-2.18 0.61 Non Fatal MI 7.8 11.2 0.69 0.44-1.09 0.11 New Renal Failure 0.2 1.2 0.20 0.02-1.72 0.14 PCI 1.7 1.0 1.78 0.52-6.08 0.36 Re-do CABG 0 0 1.00.. 44

Costs per patient at 1 year Off-pump $ On-pump $ Difference $ Initial Hospitalization 8588 9522-935 Discharge to 6 months 907 572 335 6 to 12 months 286 533-247 Total 9780 10627-847 The costs do not include the off-pump retractor or the CPB disposals The final cost will vary per center and their local contracts 45

Conclusions Significant benefits with Off-pump CABG at 30 days and 1 year in Canadian centres Same variation of risks/benefits by EuroSCORE is seen Reduction of $847 average cost per patient Off-pump CABG should be mastered by all Canadian cardiac surgeons 46

Recruitment CHUM: 309 Hamilton General: 210 London Univ. Hosp.: 106 Vancouver St Paul s: 61 Foothills Medical Centre: 51 Montreal Heart Institute: 35 Sunnybrook HSC: 30 Toronto General: 14 CHUS: 14 47