Shaping Behavior. Incentives and Sanctions

Similar documents
Shaping Behavior. Incentives and Sanctions. The Challenge

Incentives and Sanctions Responses to Client Behavior

Incentives. Standard 17: Applying Incentives and Sanctions See section 10 of binder. Principles of Behavior Modification. Learning Objectives:

TRI science. addiction

A Foundation for Evidence-Based Justice Decisions

Behavior Modification and the Seriously Mentally Ill or Functionally Impaired: Special Issues to Consider

MCJRP 2016 Evolving Evidence Based Practice. LOCAL PUBLIC SAFETY COORDINATING COUNCIL May 3, 2016

Assessing Risk for Persons with Behavioral Health Needs Involved in the Criminal Justice System

Thirteen (13) Questions Judges Should Ask Their Probation Chiefs

CREATIVE INCENTIVES. Developed by: National Drug Court Institute

Targeting Interventions by Risk, Need, Responsivity DOUGLAS B. MARLOWE, JD, PHD

Revisiting Phases in Adult & DWI Treatment Courts

INCENTIVES, Sanctions and Therapeutic Responses BEST PRACTICE STANDARDS IN A NUTSHELL HELEN HARBERTS

Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Chief of Science, Law & Policy. National Association of Drug Court Professionals

APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO ESTABLISH A DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROGRAM SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA

Berks County Treatment Courts

Targeting Interventions by Risk, Need, Responsivity DOUGLAS B. MARLOWE, JD, PHD

EFFECTIVE PROGRAM PRINCIPLES MATRIX

Carey guides KARI BERG

Research Says Best Practices in Assessment, Management and Treatment of Impaired Drivers. NADCP July 28, 2015

Incentives and Sanctions: Practical Application of the Science of Behavior Change. Shannon M. Carey, Ph.D. Based on Need to Know Fact Sheet by NDCI

Courts and Jails. Evidence-Based Judicial Decision Making

BJA GRANT PROJECT: Utah s Adult Drug Treatment Courts. Project Overview

Problem-Solving Courts : A Brief History. The earliest problem-solving court was a Drug Court started in Miami-Dade County, FL in 1989

Section I. 1. Drug courts integrate alcohol and other drug treatment services with justice system case processing.

Use of Incentives and Sanctions to Promote Compliance with Supervision during Reentry: An Implementation Strategy

TURNING POINT ASSESSMENT/TREATMENT WOMAN ABUSE PROTOCOL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY

COMPLIMENTARY TREATMENT STANDARD VI SOCIAL SERVICES AND

Legal and Adversarial Roles in Collaborative Courts

2017 JDTC On-Site Technical Assistance Delivery REQUEST FORM

ADAPTING YOUR COURT STRUCTURE

National Drug Court Institute. Drug Court Training. Presented by: Judge Phyllis McMillen & Jessica Parks

Juvenile Justice Vision 20/20 Fall Conference November 13, 2014 Grand Valley State University

Rock County Drug Court Treatment Program

The FY 2018 BJA Adult Drug Court Grant: Funding Opportunity for Tribes

Testimony of Marc Mauer Executive Director The Sentencing Project

Responding to Homelessness. 11 Ideas for the Justice System

Index. Handbook SCREENING & TREATMENT ENHANCEMENT P A R T STEP. Guidelines and Program Information for First Felony and Misdemeanor Participants

Do the Adult Best Practices Standards Apply to Other Treatment Court Types? What Fits, What Might Fit, What Doesn t Fit

ADULT DRUG TREATMENT COURT STANDARDS

NOT BE A DRUG COURT... DOUGLAS B. MARLOWE, J.D., PH.D.

Kevin Knight, Ph.D., Associate Director Science of Addiction & Evidenced-Based Treatment

Risk assessment principle and Risk management

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Maximizing the Impact of Juvenile Justice Interventions: The Importance of Risk/Needs Assessment

Do the Adult Best Practices Standards Apply to Other Treatment Court Types? What Fits, What Might Fit, What Doesn t Fit

2016 MATCP Conference. Research Says Best Practices in Assessment, Management, and Treatment of Impaired Drivers. Mark Stodola Probation Fellow

Nature of Risk and/or Needs Assessment

Risk-Need-Responsivity: Managing Risk & Mental Health For Juvenile Justice-Involved Youth

TUCSON CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COURT

Behavior Modification and the Seriously Mentally Ill or Functionally Impaired: Special Issues to Consider

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DRUG DIVERSION PROGRAM

An Overview of Procedures and Roles: A Case Study on the Drug Courts of Jamaica

Evidence-Based Practice: Psychosocial Interventions

HARRIS COUNTY FELONY MENTAL HEALTH COURT PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK JUDGE BROCK THOMAS JUDGE DAVID MENDOZA

2017 NADCP Conference. Research Says Best Practices in Assessment, Management, and Treatment of Impaired Drivers. Mark Stodola Probation Fellow

Drug Courts: Blending Treatment and Accountability

Welcome! High-Risk High-Need. Means for. Exploring What. Matching Service to Need. Family Drug Courts. Nancy K. Young, PhD. Doug Marlowe, JD, PhD

STATUS REPORT: MEASURING OUTCOMES. Prepared by The Center for Applied Research and Analysis The Institute for Social Research University of New Mexico

Sexually Addicted Offender Program

Colorado Statewide DWI and Drug Court Process Assessment and Outcome Evaluation

The Risk of Alcohol-Related Traffic Events and Recidivism Among Young Offenders A Theoretical Approach

What Is Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT)?

Specialty Courts, Detention Diversion, and Best Practices

Addressing Co-Occurring Disorders in Court-Based Programs

Chapter. Applying Incentives and Sanctions. Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D.

Gambler Addiction Index: Gambler Assessment

Honorable Mary Jane Knisely Presiding Judge, Yellowstone County Veterans Treatment Court

Live Free...Drug Free Tools for Hope

Welcome to. St. Louis County Adult. Drug Court. This Handbook is designed to:

Responding to Homelessness. 11 Ideas for the Justice System

CLINICALLY SUPERVISED EXPERIENCE for the Criminal Justice Professional (PAGE 1 of 2) APPLICANT S NAME SUPERVISOR S NAME AGENCY

TENNESSEE RECOVERY ORIENTED COMPLIANCE COURT STRATEGY TN ROCCS. Duane Slone Circuit Court Judge 4 th Judicial District State of Tennessee

PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY VETERANS TREATMENT COURT

Drug Court Victoria. Katharine Biffin Program Manager Drug Court Melbourne May 2018

CHEROKEE TRIBAL DRUG COURT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING made and entered into on the 1 st day

LEWIS COUNTY COURT DRUG COURT

Guadalupe County Veterans Treatment Court Participant s Handbook Updated: October 18, 2016

GENERAL ORDER 426- MENTALLY ILL AND HOMELESS PERSONS

Welcome to the Wood Pilot Project

Basic Risk Assessment. Kemshall, H., Mackenzie, G., Wilkinson, B., (2011) Risk of Harm Guidance and Training Resource CD Rom, De Montfort University

2016 JDC On-Site Technical Assistance Delivery REQUEST FORM

FAQ: Alcohol and Drug Treatments

Florida s Mental Health Act

ACE! The Risk-Need- Responsivity Simulation Tool. The Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence. Solutions For Justice Professionals.

Handbook for Drug Court Participants

PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND

Are Drug Treatment Programs in Prison Effective in Reducing Recidivism Rates?

NEW MEXICO DRUG/DWI COURT Peer Review Summary Report

The New York State Adult Drug Court Evaluation

Syracuse Community Treatment Court. Handbook for Participants. Guidelines and Program Information

Best Practices Review Drug & EtG/EtS Testing. By: Paul L. Cary Independent Forensic Toxicology Consultant

SIGNATURE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR OR CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

Family Intervention Court. Participant Handbook

Tri-Occurring supervision in the criminal Justice System

Stephen W. Ward Assistant District Attorney (Retired) Charlotte, North Carolina

Florida Supreme Court Task Force on Treatment-Based Drug Courts April 2007

Maximizing the Impact of Interventions for Youth: The Importance of Risk/Needs Assessment

CRIMINAL JUSTICE (504)

THE 21ST CENTURY CURES ACT: TACKLING MENTAL HEALTH FROM THE INSIDE OUT

Transcription:

Shaping Behavior Incentives and Sanctions

The Challenge Legal People Reward offenders for what they are legally required to do! Treatment and avoiding charges are reward and incentive Treatment providers Not comfortable with punishing clients Supposed to be safe, non-judgmental environment

The Result Heavy reliance on incentives and sanctions Improper balance Risk: Habituation Risk: Ceiling Effect

The Ideal Rewards to increase desirable behavior Sanctions to decrease undesired behavior Used together produce better outcomes Rule of Thumb: equal opportunity to earn a reward or incur a sanction If one can be punished for not doing something (missing treatment) they should also be able to attend a reward for compliance

Behavior Modification Factors Certainty and consistency certain and consistent application of incentives and sanctions leads to more effective court Supervision to apply incentives and sanctions consistently monitoring behavior is crucial

Risk Principle Intensive Drug Court programs produce greatest benefits for offenders with anti-social backgrounds and are resistant to treatment Require more concentrated and sustained intervention Consideration of risk is necessary Drug Court offers small benefits at a high cost for low risk offenders Risk of learned anti-social behaviors from high-risk offenders

Risk Comparison High-Risk Likelihood that an offender will not success on standard supervision; and Low-Risk Predisposed to modify behavior with minimal legal intervention Continue to engage in same behaviors that led to trouble Not risk of violence or dangerousness

Criminogenic Need Clinical disorders or impairments that, if treated reduce likelihood of continued criminal activity Examples Substance dependence (addiction) Major psychiatric disorders Brain injury Lack of basic employment/living skills

Assessment is Critical Common deficiency: assessment of the clinical diagnosis Use brief screening instrument to determine abuse or dependence Wide net Identify a number of false positives Individuals who are substance USERS are grouped with those who are substance DEPENDENT

Recommendations: Screening tools indicating dependence should be followed by in-depth clinical evaluation Structured or semi-structured interview Use criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) Properly trained evaluators Complete the assessment of risk and need BEFORE individual requirements established

Marlowe s Risk/Need Matrix High Low High (Substance Dependent) Standard Drug Court Status calendar Substance abuse treatment Pro-social habilitation Adaptive habilitation Focus consequences on treatment & supervision Medication Treatment Emphasis Noncompliance calendar Substance abuse treatment Adaptive habilitation Focus consequences on treatment Medication Low (Substance Abuse) Accountability Emphasis Status calendar Prevention services Pro-social habilitation Focus consequences on abstinence and supervision Diversion Emphasis Noncompliance calendar Prevention services Focus consequences on abstinence

Shaping Proximal Goals Behavior participant is capable of performing and are necessary for long-term objectives Attending court Attending counseling Distal Goals Behaviors that are ultimately desired but will take time to accomplish Employment Effective parenting

Shaping Behavior HR/HN Focus consequences on treatment and supervision Compliance with treatment and supervision conditions are a proximal goal Failure to complete proximal goals should result in higher magnitude sanctions Abstinence is a distal goal Use should result in lower magnitude treatment oriented responses

Shaping Behavior LR/HN Focus consequences on treatment Treatment attendance is proximal goal Failing to attend treatment Non-compliance hearing Substantial sanction Abstinence is a distal goal Use should result in treatment oriented response

Shaping Behavior HR/LN Focus consequences on abstinence and supervision Compliance with abstinence and supervision are proximal goals Failure to comply should result in higher magnitude sanctions

Shaping Behavior LR/LN Focus consequences on abstinence Abstinence is a proximal goal

Supervision Drug Testing Minimum 2x per week Nights, weekends and holidays Random Last supervisory burden to be reduced or lifted Law Enforcement and Community Corrections Officer Supervision leads to better outcomes Witnessing participants in their natural environments

Timing of Incentives and Sanctions Window of opportunity begins to close within a few hours or days of behavior Longer interval between behavior and imposition of incentive or sanction reduces effectiveness Magnitude of incentive or sanction is critical Avoid coddling Avoid the I have a hammer so everything looks like a nail syndrome Not just looking for negative behavior catch a participant doing something right

The Startling Truth Sanctions and incentives are not the most effective at high magnitudes Incentives at low to moderate magnitudes are effective Sanctions that are in the intermediate range are the most effective Weak sanctions = Habituation = stagnant outcomes Harsh sanctions = Ceiling Effect = resentment and avoidance Do not limit your ability to ratchet sanctions up or down as necessary

Sanctions Due Process and Procedural Fairness Sanctions will be received better Fair procedures were followed Participant given reasonable opportunity to explain Treated like similar people in similar circumstances Treated with respect and dignity Clear explanation for how and why a decision was reached

Incentives Small or Non-Tangible Tangible Fishbowl Procedure Comparable or better outcomes than rewarding every positive behavior Possibility of winning an award compensates for the reduced chances of success Entertainment No evidence of gambling trigger Impactful for HR/HN habituated to punishment and not used to receiving positive reinforcement

Responding to a Positive Drug Test Jimmy is in the first phase of your Wellness Court. He has 10 days of sobriety. During a recent field visit by probation, Jimmy tested positive for amphetamines. This information was brought before the Wellness Court Team for consideration. Do you recommend a punitive sanction or an adjustment to his treatment plan?

It Depends! Substance Dependent Substance dependent require time and effort to achieve sobriety High magnitude sanction = ceiling effect Run out of options Response to early use may result in enhanced treatment. Substance use later in treatment may result in increased sanctions Substance Abuse Use is voluntary and under their control Increased treatment may not be logical Escalating sanctions may permit them to continue to use until sanction reaches threshold of attention Apply higher magnitude sanction

Assessments Matter Substance dependent users and substance abusers should receive different consequences for use early in treatment Separate them into different groups to avoid perceptions of unfairness Changes in treatment plans should be recommended by a trained clinician

Shaping through Sanctions and Incentives Sanctions Failure to meet proximal goals/expectations Sanction high to avoid habituation Failure to meet distal goals/expectations Sanction low to avoid the ceiling effect Incentives Meeting proximal expectations Reward with lowermagnitude incentive Meeting distal behaviors Reward with highermagnitude rewards

Shaping and Phase Advancement Distal goals should become proximal goals When distal behavior (abstinence at Phase I) becomes proximate behavior (abstinence at Phase IV) Failure of proximal goal = higher magnitude sanctions Achievement proximal goal = lower magnitude incentive Phase Advancement should advise participant about expected changes in proximal and distal goals and behaviors

Possible Sanctions and www.ndcrc.org Incentives 12 pages of low, moderate and high incentives and sanctions Lists from other jurisdictions

Further Information www.ndcrc.org Marlow, D.B. Behavior Modification 101 for Drug Courts: Making the Most of Incentives and Sanctions, NDCI Drug Court Practitioner Fact Sheet, September 2012

We all Should take a leap of faith Need a little help And can to do together what we cannot do alone!