Client/Testing Information

Similar documents
Process of a neuropsychological assessment

Tasks of Executive Control TEC. Protocol Summary Report. Developed by Peter K. Isquith, PhD, Robert M. Roth, PhD, Gerard A. Gioia, PhD, and PAR Staff

Carmen Inoa Vazquez, Ph.D., ABPP Clinical Professor NYU School of Medicine Lead Litigation Conference Philadelphia May 19, 2009 Presentation

The Association Between Comorbidities and Neurocognitive Impairment in Aging Veterans with HIV

NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT S A R A H R A S K I N, P H D, A B P P S A R A H B U L L A R D, P H D, A B P P

Psychological Tests that Examine Brain Functioning

Score Report. Test Administered WMS IV (3/16/2009) Age at Testing 24 years 0 months Retest? No

APPENDIX A TASK DEVELOPMENT AND NORMATIVE DATA

Score Report N. Florida Ave. Lutz, FL

Detecting neurocognitive impairment in HIV-infected youth: Are we focusing on the wrong factors?

Tasks of Executive Control TEC. Score Report. Developed by Peter K. Isquith, PhD, Robert M. Roth, PhD, Gerard A. Gioia, PhD, and PAR Staff

Improving the Methodology for Assessing Mild Cognitive Impairment Across the Lifespan

Neuropsychological Evaluation of

Supplementary Online Content

Normative Corrections for the Halstead Reitan Neuropsychological Battery

Identifying Information

Meniere s Disease Case. Suzanne Beason-Hazen, Ph.D.

W E N D Y H A R T I N G E R

Issues of Neuropsychological Assessment in International Settings

Measurement and Classification of Neurocognitive Disability in HIV/AIDS Robert K. Heaton Ph.D University of California San Diego Ancient History

Interpretive Report. Client Information

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Overview for Best Practice in Stroke and Complex Neurological Conditions March 2013

NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT

Empire BlueCross BlueShield Professional Commercial Reimbursement Policy

Neuropsychological Testing in Occupational Medicine

Serial 7s and Alphabet Backwards as Brief Measures of Information Processing Speed

NEUROBEHAVIORAL EVALUATION OF HOUSEHOLD EXPOSURE TO DURSBAN 1

ID: Test Date: 06/06/2017 Name: John Sample Examiner Name: Tina Anderson

Tasks of Executive Control TEC. Interpretive Report. Developed by Peter K. Isquith, PhD, Robert M. Roth, PhD, Gerard A. Gioia, PhD, and PAR Staff

Beyond the Psychologist s Report. Nancy Foster, PhD Institute for Brain-Behavior Integration

Reliability Evidence Validity Evidence. Criterion: Other (e.g.,

CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY PSYC32

21/05/2018. Today s webinar will answer. Presented by: Valorie O Keefe Consultant Psychologist

WHI Memory Study (WHIMS) Investigator Data Release Data Preparation Guide April 2014

Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function BRIEF. Interpretive Report. Developed by SAMPLE

ARIC V6 NCS Codebook I, S.3. Section 3: V6 / NCS Forms

Feasibility of a Brief Neuropsychologic Test Battery During Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation After Traumatic Brain Injury

Interpretive Report. Developed by Peter R. Vagg, PhD, and Charles D. Spielberger, PhD. Client Information

disorders in patients with occlusive disease of the carotid artery: a systematic review of the literature

The Influence of Sleep on Cognition in Breast Cancer

Base Rates of Impaired Neuropsychological Test Performance Among Healthy Older Adults

Neuropsychological Test Development and Normative Data on Hispanics

Early intervention in Bipolar Disorder

Post-Stroke Targeted Evaluation. Jon Van Doren, Ph.D. Arizona Neuropsychology, PC Scottsdale, AZ

The Use of Brief Assessment Batteries in Multiple Sclerosis. History of Cognitive Studies in MS

NIH Toolbox. Scoring and Interpretation Guide. September 18, 2012

by Peter K. Isquith, PhD, Robert M. Roth, PhD, Gerard A. Gioia, PhD, and PAR Staff

PAI Law Enforcement, Corrections, and Public Safety Selection Report by Michael D. Roberts, PhD, ABPP

The significance of sensory motor functions as indicators of brain dysfunction in children

Technical Report #2 Testing Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing

Vocational Outcomes of State Voc Rehab Clients with TBI M OMBIS

Demystifying the Neuropsychological Evaluation Report. Clinical Neuropsychologist 17 March 2017 Program Director, Neurobehavioral Program

Chapter 31 Psychometric Foundations for the Interpretation of Neuropsychological Test Results *

M P---- Ph.D. Clinical Psychologist / Neuropsychologist

International Journal of Forensic Psychology Copyright Volume 1, No. 3 SEPTEMBER 2006 pp. 1-21

Human Information Processing

Effects of Pesticide Exposure on Learning and Development

Pesticide Exposure, Intelligence and Children: Preliminary Results

Pesticide Exposure, Intelligence and Children: Preliminary Results

Method. NeuRA Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder April 2016

Healthy Children Get Low Scores Too: Prevalence of Low Scores on the NEPSY-II in Preschoolers, Children, and Adolescents

TOPF (Test of Pre-Morbid Function)

Date of Onset is defined as the first day the claimant meets the definition of disability as defined in the Act and regulations.

Traumatic Brain Injury for VR Counselors Margaret A. Struchen, Ph.D. and Laura M. Ritter, Ph.D., M.P.H.

Approach to HIV Associated Neurocognitive disorders (HAND)

Disclosure statement

ASHA Comments* (ASHA Recommendations Compared to DSM-5 Criteria) Austism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)

Effects of Comorbid Disease on Pre-treatment Neurobehavioral Functioning. Sunita K. Patel, PhD Assistant Professor. City of Hope Medical Center

Plenary Session 2 Psychometric Assessment. Ralph H B Benedict, PhD, ABPP-CN Professor of Neurology and Psychiatry SUNY Buffalo

Ohio. SAMPLE NCCI Edits*** Navigate to the Overall Coding Sheet

Is Co-norming Required?

The exploration of neuropsychological disorders in HAART- naïve young adults in South Africa

Test review. Comprehensive Trail Making Test (CTMT) By Cecil R. Reynolds. Austin, Texas: PRO-ED, Inc., Test description

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Cochlear Implants Int. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 March 15.

Human Information Processing. CS160: User Interfaces John Canny

Test Assessment Description Ref. Global Deterioration Rating Scale Dementia severity Rating scale of dementia stages (2) (4) delayed recognition

The Role of Cardiovascular Risk and Aging in Memory Performance in a Sample of Veterans with HIV

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER

NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL IMPAIRMENTS AND AGE-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS WITH FETAL ALCOHOL SPECTRUM DISORDERS

Affective Disorders most often should be viewed in conjunction with other physical and mental impairments.

Date of Onset is defined as the first day the claimant meets the definition of disability as defined in the Act and regulations.

Consolidating working memory: Enhancing cognitive performance through effective encoding

Study of Verbal Working Memory in Patients with Parkinson s Disease

Rapidly-administered short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 3rd edition

Potential for interpretation disparities of Halstead Reitan neuropsychological battery performances in a litigating sample,

The neuropsychological profiles of mild Alzheimer s disease and questionable dementia as compared to age-related cognitive decline

Table 1: Summary of measures of cognitive fatigability operationalised in existing research.

DOES IMPAIRED EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONING DIFFERENTIALLY IMPACT VERBAL MEMORY MEASURES IN OLDER ADULTS WITH SUSPECTED DEMENTIA?

College of Health Sciences. Communication Sciences and Disorders

Running head: CPPS REVIEW 1

UDS version 3 Summary of major changes to UDS form packets

THE UTILITY OF THE MCCARRON-DIAL SYSTEM IN DETERMINING LOCATION OF BRAIN LESION. Erin Kathleen Taylor, B.S., M.S.

Example of individual with Moderate Receptive Aphasia, Severe Expressive Aphasia and Moderate Apraxia of Speech

The Relationship Between Age and Cognitive Function in HIV-Infected Men

Pesticide Exposure, Intelligence and Children: Preliminary Results

Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Performance in Above Average and Superior School Children: Relationship to Intelligence and Age

Acknowledgements. The Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests (SIPT) APPROPRIATE POPULATIONS. Purpose of the SIPT. Clinical Tool. Age Groups 14/5/2015

EARLY ONSET FRONTOTERMPORAL DEMENTIA AND ALZHEIMERS DISEASE: DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND CARE

Brain-based disorders in children, teens, and young adults: When to know there is a problem and what to do

Transcription:

Revised Comprehensive Norms for an Expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery: Demographically Adjusted Neuropsychological Norms for African American and Caucasian Adults Developed By Robert K. Heaton, PhD, S. Walden Miller, PhD, Michael J. aylor, PhD, and Igor Grant, MD Client/esting Information Client Name : Sample Client Client ID : 123-45-6789 Date of Birth : 11/01/1937 Age : 66 Sex : Female Education : 12 Ethnicity : Caucasian/White Date of Examination : 11/10/03 Normative Sample : Caucasian Use of this report requires a thorough understanding of the included tests, their interpretation, and clinical applications, as presented in the Revised Comprehensive Norms for an Expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery: Demographically Adjusted Neuropsychological Norms for African American and Caucasian Adults manual (Heaton, Miller, aylor, & Grant, 04). his report is intended for use by qualified professionals. his report reflects standardized administration and scoring of the tests. he normative in this program were developed by Heaton et al. (04) using data from Caucasian and African American adults (ages -85 years), who were neurologically normal by history, whose native language was English, and who had received standard educations in the United States. Application of the norms to clients with other ages, ethnicities, or educational/linguistic backgrounds will have uncertain validity and will not allow straightforward interpretation. Any such use should be made with considerable clinical caution and should be accompanied by clear statements about the inherent limitations of the approach: e.g., this client s test results will be compared with normal expectations for a person with another (specified) age/ethnicity, and the applicability of such normative standards to this client is uncertain." Results on the tests in this report should be interpreted within the context of a larger clinical assessment, including relevant clinical and historical information about this client. Additionally, use of the current for clinical or diagnostic decisions should not be attempted without a good understanding of brain-behavior relationships and the medical and psychological factors that affect them. PAR Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. 164 North Florida Ave. Lutz, FL 33549 1.800.331.8378 www.parinc.com Copyright 1991, 1992, 03, 04 by Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in whole or in part in any form or by any means without written permission of Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. Version: 3.00.012

Client: Sample Client est Date: 11/10/03 ID#: 123-45-6789 Page 2 of 11 Additional Client/esting Information Handedness : Examiner : Referred by : Peripheral Injuries : Working Diagnosis : Medications : Version of WAIS : Right Examiner Bilateral hearing loss Rule out dementing disorder Acetaminophen with codeine WAIS Clinical Notes and Comments Speech Sounds Perception est was administered, but is considered invalid because of patient's high frequency hearing loss. AIR and GDS are prorated without the Speech Sounds Perception est.

Client: Sample Client est Date: 11/10/03 ID#: 123-45-6789 Page 3 of 11 Summary Scores WAIS Full Scale IQ (NE) [WAIS FSIQ] 103 8 Below Average Average Impairment Rating [AIR] Global Score [GDS] 1.36 8 51 Average 0.20 45 Average below appear in bold italic type. (NE) Score is not adjusted for ethnicity. Interpret cautiously for non-caucasian examinees. Executive Functions WCS-Perseverative Errors (NE) [WCS] Category est (errors) [CA ERROR] rail Making est Part B (secs) [RAIL B] hurstone Word Fluency (correct) [HUR FLU] Letter Fluency-FAS (total correct) [FAS] Category Fluency- Animals (total correct) [ANIMALS] 43 37 Mild Impairment 64 7 48 Average 0 106 7 42 Below Average 0 39 10 Average 0 below appear in bold italic type. (NE) Score is not adjusted for ethnicity. Interpret cautiously for non-caucasian examinees.

Client: Sample Client est Date: 11/10/03 ID#: 123-45-6789 Page 4 of 11 Attention/Working Memory WAIS Digit Span (NE) [WAIS DIGI SPAN] Paced Auditory Serial Addition est (total correct) [PASA] Digit Vigilance-Errors [DIGI ERROR] Seashore Rhythm est (correct) [SSHOR RHYM] Speech-Sounds Perception est (errors) [SPCH PERC] 9 8 47 Average 6 9 Average 0 27 10 Average 0 below appear in bold italic type. (NE) Score is not adjusted for ethnicity. Interpret cautiously for non-caucasian examinees. Speed of Information Processing WAIS Digit Symbol (NE) [WAIS DIGI SYMB] rail Making est Part A (secs) [RAIL A] Digit Vigilance-ime (secs) [DIGI IME] 7 6 44 Below Average 44 7 44 Below Average 0 568 5 33 Mild to Moderate Impairment 2 below appear in bold italic type. (NE) Score is not adjusted for ethnicity. Interpret cautiously for non-caucasian examinees.

Client: Sample Client est Date: 11/10/03 ID#: 123-45-6789 Page 5 of 11 Spatial Skills WAIS Block Design (NE) [WAIS BLOCK DESGN] actual Performance est otal ime (min/blk) [P IME] Spatial Relations* (rating) [SPA REL] 7 6 42 Below Average 0.0 9 56 Above Average 0 3 9 47 Average 0 below appear in bold italic type. (NE) Score is not adjusted for ethnicity. Interpret cautiously for non-caucasian examinees. * for this variable are not normally distributed, but have satisfactory specificity for < cutoff. Verbal/Academic Skills WAIS Vocabulary (NE) [WAIS VOCAB] Aphasia Screening est (errors) [APHAS SCRN] Boston Naming est (correct) [BSN NAME] BDAE Complex Ideational Material (NE) * (correct) [BDAE COMP] PIA Reading Recognition (percentile) [PIA RECOG] PIA Reading Comprehension (NE) (percentile) [PIA COMP] PIA Spelling (NE) (percentile) [PIA SPELL] 9 7 39 Mild Impairment 12 5 28 Moderate Impairment 3 49 7 41 Below Average 0 12 12 58 Above Average 24 6 36 Mild Impairment 5 34 Mild to Moderate Impairment 35 8 41 Below Average below appear in bold italic type. (NE) Score is not adjusted for ethnicity. Interpret cautiously for non-caucasian examinees. * for this variable are not normally distributed, but have satisfactory specificity for < cutoff.

Client: Sample Client est Date: 11/10/03 ID#: 123-45-6789 Page 6 of 11 Verbal Episodic Memory Story Memory rial 1 (correct) [SORY-1] Story Memory Learning (points/trials) [SORY LEARN] Story Memory Delayed Recall (correct) [SORY RECALL] Story Memory Loss (% loss) [SORY LOSS] CVL rial 1 (correct) [CVL-1] CVL rial 5 (correct) [CVL-5] CVL rials 1-5 (correct) [CVL-O] CVL Short Delay Free Recall (correct) [CVL-SDFR] CVL Long Delay Free Recall (correct) [CVL-LDFR] 14.0 10 55 Above Average 10.00 9 54 Average 0 19.0 12 58 Above Average 0 5.00 11 54 Average below appear in bold italic type.

Client: Sample Client est Date: 11/10/03 ID#: 123-45-6789 Page 7 of 11 Visual Episodic Memory actual Performance est-memory (correct) [P MEM] actual Performance est-location (correct) [P LOC] Figure Memory rial 1 (correct) [FIGUR-1] Figure Memory Learning (points/trials) [FIGUR LEARN] Figure Memory Delayed Recall (correct) [FIGUR RECALL] Figure Memory Loss* (% loss) [FIGUR LOSS] 6 7 44 Below Average 0 3 9 52 Average 0 12 9 55 Above Average 5. 7 47 Average 0 15 10 53 Average 0 6.00 10 48 Average below appear in bold italic type. * for this variable are not normally distributed, but have satisfactory specificity for < cutoff. Sensory Perceptual Skills Sensory-Perceptual- otal (errors) [SP O] actile Form Recognition Worst hand (secs) [FR WH] 2.0 11 56 Above Average 0 9.5 11 59 Above Average below appear in bold italic type. Motor Skills Finger apping Worst hand (taps) [AP WH] Hand Dynamometer Worst hand (kgs) [GRIP WH] Grooved Pegboard Worst hand (secs) [PEG WH] 42.6 8 54 Average 0 24.0 6 47 Average 77 8 Average 0 below appear in bold italic type.

Client: Sample Client est Date: 11/10/03 ID#: 123-45-6789 Page 8 of 11 Lateralized Sensorimotor/Psychomotor Comparisons Finger apping Dominant (taps) [AP DH] Finger apping Nondominant (taps) [AP NDH] Hand Dynamometer Dominant (kgs) [GRIP DH] Hand Dynamometer Nondominant (kgs) [GRIP NDH] Grooved Pegboard Dominant (secs) [PEG DH] Grooved Pegboard Nondominant (secs) [PEG NDH] actual Performance est Dominant (min/blk) [P DH] actual Performance est Nondominant (min/blk) [P NDH] actual Performance est Both hands (min/blk) [P BH] Sensory-Perceptual Right (errors) [SP R] Sensory-Perceptual Left* (errors) [SP L] actile Form Recognition Right (secs) [FR R] actile Form Recognition Left (secs) [FR L] 45.4 8 55 Above Average 42.6 8 54 Average 24.0 6 47 Average.5 6 48 Average 68 9 55 Above Average 77 8 Average 0.76 8 47 Average 0.48 10 58 Above Average 0.28 10 57 Above Average 2.0 10 Average 0.0 13 64 Above Average 9.5 11 59 Above Average 7.5 12 62 Above Average below appear in bold italic type. * for this variable are not normally distributed, but have satisfactory specificity for < cutoff. L = Right - left difference, with possible lateralizing significance.

Client: Sample Client est Date: 11/10/03 ID#: 123-45-6789 Page 9 of 11 Summary Scores Executive Functions Error! Reference source not found. Scale WAIS AIR GDS WCS CA RAIL HUR FAS ANIMALS FSIQ ERROR B FLU Score 51 45 37 48 42 Attention/Working Memory Speed of Information Processing Scale WAIS PASA DIGI SSHOR SPCH WAIS RAIL DIGI DIGI SPAN ERROR RHYM PERC DIGI SYMB A IME

Client: Sample Client est Date: 11/10/03 ID#: 123-45-6789 Page 10 of 11 Spatial Skills Verbal/Academic Skills Scale WAIS P SPA WAIS APHAS BSN BDAE PIA PIA PIA BLK DESGN IME REL VOCAB SCRN NAME COMP RECOG COMP SPELL Score 42 56 47 39 28 41 58 36 34 41 Verbal Episodic Memory Scale SORY- SORY SORY SORY CVL-1 CVL-5 CVL- CVL- CVL- 1 LEARN RECALL LOSS O SDFR LDFR Score 55 54 58 54

Client: Sample Client est Date: 11/10/03 ID#: 123-45-6789 Page 11 of 11 Sensory Perceptual Visual Episodic Memory Skills Motor Skills Scale P P FIGUR- FIGUR FIGUR FIGUR SP FR AP GRIP PEG MEM LOC 1 LEARN RECALL LOSS O WH WH WH WH Score 44 52 55 47 53 48 56 59 54 47 Lateralized Sensorimotor/Psychomotor Comparisons Scale AP AP GRIP GRIP PEG PEG P P P SP SP FR FR DH NDH DH NDH DH NDH DH NDH BH R L R L Score 55 54 47 48 55 47 58 57 64 59 62