Latest Insights from the LEVANT II study and sub-group analysis

Similar documents
Update on the Levant 2 Clinical Trial Programme. Dierk Scheinert, MD University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig, Germany

Alternative concepts for drug delivery in BTK arteries the LIMBO project

Is a Stent or Scaffold Necessary in The SFA?

Promise and limitations of DCB in long lesions What Have we Learned from Clinical Trials? Ramon L. Varcoe, MBBS, MS, FRACS, PhD

COMPARE-Pilot RCT: 1-year results of a randomised comparison of RANGER DCB vs. IN.PACT DCB in complex SFA lesions. Dierk Scheinert

Long-term results with interwoven nitinol stents vs. BMS vs. DCB

Real PTX RCT: 3 year data from a randomized comparison of DCB vs. DES in femoropopliteal lesions

TOBA II 12-Month Results Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty

Dierk Scheinert, MD. Department of Angiology University Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Long Lesions: Primary stenting or DCB first? John Laird MD Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St. Helena, CA

Lutonix DCB in BTK Update on the BTK real world registry and RCT

Novel concept for drug delivery in infrapopliteal arteries The LIMBO trial

Rotarex mechanical thrombectomythe first line option for thrombotic occlusions?

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Insights from the IN.PACT Global Full Clinical Cohort

Outcomes Of DCB Use In Real World Registries: 2 Year Results From The INPACT Global Registry

Update on the Ranger clinical trial programme

The Illumina FIH study with a next generation DES 12-months results

12-month Outcomes of Post Dilatation in the IN.PACT Global CTO Cohort. Gunnar Tepe, MD RodMed Clinic Rosenheim Rosenheim, Germany

Rotarex mechanical debulking: The Leipzig experience in patients

Do we really need a stent in long SFA lesions? No: DEB is the answer

RANGER SFA REGISTRY Interim Analysis. Bernd Gehringhoff, MD On behalf the Ranger SFA Registry Investigators

Michael K. W. Lichtenberg, MD, FESC Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster. Dierk Scheinert, M.D. Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR

Michael K.W. Lichtenberg, MD

Christian Wissgott MD, PhD Assistant Director, Radiology Westküstenkliniken Heide

The Lutonix BTK Clinical Trial Programme: Status Update and Real World Clinical Experience

Update from Korea on the Lutonix SFA registry 12 month data

Could a combination of DCB + stent be the answer in complex SFA lesions

New approaches for drug delivery in BTK arteries

DCB in my practice: How the evidence influences my strategy. Yang-Jin Park

Drug- Coated Balloons for the SFA: Overview of Technology and Results

LUTONIX DCB in BTK Update on the BTK clinical program & single center experience

Disclosures. In the DCB Era, How Do I Choose To Use a Stent? When to Stent and What Devices to Use in the SFA

Efficacy of DEB in Calcification and Subintimal Angioplasty

Future Algorithm for Lower Extremity Revascularization: Where Does Vessel Prep Fit?

ILLUMENATE FIH Direct DCB Cohort 12-Month Results

Contemporary use of DCBs, Ranger clinical trial and investigator sponsored research

Disclosures. How many people have heard a talk on DCBs? By show of hands, how many people here have used a DCB?

Is combination therapy with directional atherectomy followed by DCB the answer to challenges in treating SFA disease?

Disclosures. Rational Selection of Endovascular Options for the SFA and Popliteal: What Works Where and for How Long?

Vessel Preparation Prior to DCB and Stenting: How to Do It.

The Role of Lithotripsy in Solving the Challenges of Vascular Calcium. Thomas Zeller, MD

Atherectomy is Still Live and Effective. John R. Laird, MD Professor of Medicine Medical Director of the Vascular Center UC Davis Health System

BIOLUX P-III Passeo-18 Lux All-comers Registry: 12-month Results for the All-Comers Cohort

LIFESTREAM TM First look at the BOLSTER 2-year follow up data

Clinical Data Update for Drug Coated Balloons (DCB) Seung-Whan Lee, MD, PhD

Michael K. W. Lichtenberg MD, FESC on behalf of KANSHAS 1 investigators; Tepe G, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Deloose K, Verbist J, Goverde P, Zeller T

One Year after In.Pact Deep: Lessons learned from a failed trial. Prof. Dr. Thomas Zeller

Drug Elution, Data, and Decisions

6-month 0utcomes of a Novel Sirolimus Coated DCB Technology Evaluated in SFA Thomas Zeller, MD University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen

BioMimics 3D in my Clinical Practice

Clinical use and safety of the Lutonix DCB for the treatment of BTK: interim data from a prospective registry

William A. Gray MD System Chief of Cardiovascular Services, Main Line Health President, Lankenau Heart Institute Wynnewood, PA USA

The importance of scientific evidence. Prof. I. Baumgartner Head Clinical & Interventional Angiology University Hospital Bern

The latest evidences from the DES trials in peripheral arterial disease

EffPac - Trial: Assessment of the Effectiveness of DCB versus POBA in the SFA Ulf Teichgräber, MD, MBA

ISR-treatment The Leipzig experience with purely mechanical debulking. Sven Bräunlich Department for Angiology University-Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Klinikum Rosenheim Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology

DCB use in fem-pop lesions of patients with CLI (RCC 4-5): subgroup analysis of IN.PACT Global 12-month outcomes

TOBA Trial 12 months Results

MICHAEL R. JAFF, DO MASSACHUSETTS, UNITED STATES. Medtronic Further. Together

Vessel Preparation: What does it mean and what are the current tools? Lawrence Garcia, MD St. Elizabeth s Medical Center Boston, MA, USA

2 Year Results from the MDT SFA Japan Trial - DCB vs. standard PTA for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the SFA/PPA

Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty. Thomas Zeller MD Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg & Bad Krozingen, Germany

Importance of Thorough Vessel Preparation Followed By Anti- Restenotic Therapy: An Update from the DEFINITIVE AR Study

Clinical benefits on DES Patient s perspectives

Angiographic dissection pattern and patency outcomes of post balloon angioplasty for SFA lesions -a retrospective multi center analysis-

Patterns of Vessel Calcification and Clinical Relevance

Atherectomy: Jetstream and Directional. George S. Chrysant, M.D.

IN ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA FAILURE

Making BTK Interventions more Durable: Are DES and DCB the answer? Thomas Zeller, MD

Fabrizio Fanelli, MD, EBIR Director Vascular and Interventional Radiology Department "Careggi " University Hospital Florence - Italy

Update on the role of drug eluting balloons

Maximizing Outcomes in a complex population with Drug-coated balloon

Current Status of DCB Experience with Non- Femoropopliteal Applications (Dialysis, Tibial, Venous)

How do I use mechanical debulking for the treatment of arterial occlusions

Adventitial Drug Infusion to Prevent Restenosis

OCT Guided Atherectomy: Initial Results of the VISION Trial Using the Pantheris Catheter. Patrick Muck, MD

14F OD Ovation Abdominal Stent Graft System

MEET M. Bosiers K. Deloose P. Peeters. SFA stenting in 2009 : The good and the ugly What factors influence patency?

Endovascular Therapy vs. Open Femoral Endarterectomy Rationale and Design of the Randomized PESTO Trial

Rationale and algorithm for below-the-knee acute gain optimization

Study of a Balloon-Expandable Covered Stent for Obstructive Lesions in the Iliac Artery

Which Stent Is Best for Various Femoropopliteal Anatomy? 2018 Pacific Northwest Endovascular Conference June 15-26, 2018 Seattle, WA

Why and where do I use mechanical debulking for the treatment of arterial occlusions?

DISRUPT PAD. (( Data Summary )) DISRUPT PAD Data Summary SPL Rev. B 2016 Shockwave Medical Inc. All rights reserved.

The LIMBO trial: a RCT investigating adventitial dexamethasone infusion to prevent restenosis in BTK arteries utilizing a novel angiographic endpoint

Robert W. Fincher, DO The Ritz-Carlton, Dove Mountain Marana, Arizona February 7th, 2015

Are Drug-coated balloons Durable? Level 1 evidence review. Koen Keirse, MD Vascular Surgery, RZ Tienen Tienen, Belgium

Update on the OPTIMIZE BTK Trial. Marianne Brodmann, MD Division of Angiology Medical University Graz, Austria

Comparison of Angiographic Dissection Patterns Caused by Long vs Short Balloons During Balloon Angioplasty for Chronic Femoropopliteal Occlusions

Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment

Why and how to prep the vessel

Adventitial Drug Therapy Below-the-Knee: Update on LIMBO and TANGO

Drug-coated balloons in BTK:

DURABLE. CONSISTENT. SAFE. IN.PACT Admiral Drug-Coated Balloon

Department of Radiology. EffPac - Trial:

Stents for Femoropopliteal Disease:

Luminor DCB in femoropopliteal lesions

Transcription:

Latest Insights from the LEVANT II study and sub-group analysis Prof. Dr. med. Dierk Scheinert Division of Interventional Angiology University-Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Conflicts of Interest Advisory Board /Consultant: Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Cordis, CR Bard, Gardia Medical, Medtronic/Covidien, TriReme Medical, Trivascular, Upstream Peripheral Technologies 2

LEVANT 2 Study Design

Extensive Blinding Steps Taken to Reduce Bias Blinded Patient Core Labs Patient Core Labs DUS Tech Evaluating physician Patient Core Labs DUS Tech Evaluating physician Patient Core Labs DUS Tech Evaluating physician Randomization 30 days 6 months 12 months Not Blinded Treating Physician LEVANT 2 was designed to ensure blinding of the evaluating physician and DUS Tech at every phase including 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months

LEVANT 2 RCT (N=476) Primary Patency

Full Wall Apposition Showed Increased Primary Patency at 12 Months * LEVANT 2 Clinical Trial Average 0.9:1 Balloon to Artery Ratio LEVANT 2 Full Wall Apposition Sub Group 1.04: 1 Balloon to Artery Ratio A post-hoc subgroup analysis suggests the full wall apposition of the Lutonix 035 Drug Coated Balloon (minimum 1.04:1 balloon-to-artery ratio of the treatment device) showed increased primary patency of 79.9% (at 12 months Kaplan Meier, not pre-specified). Primary patency is defined as absence of binary restenosis defined by DUS PSVR 2.5 and freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR). Primary safety by treatment balloon / artery ratio <1 was 85.8% (DCB) and 82.1% (PTA). Primary safety by treatment balloon / artery ratio >1 was 79.3% (DCB) and 75.5% (PTA). Warning: Do not exceed Rated Burst Pressure. 6

Procedural Techniques for Optimal Drug Delivery Observations from LEVANT 2 suggest 12 month Primary Patency maybe positively influenced by Balloon Transit Time Balloon Inflation Pressure Balloon Inflation Time Final % Diameter Stenosis Indicators from Levant 2 Data Analysis

LEVANT 2 DCB Procedural Variable Analysis Final Residual Stenosis < 20% 74% 75% Inflation time 120 sec 65% 77% 79% n=28 82% 92% 84% n=22 n=19 n=12 85% n=27 62% 69% Pressure > 7 ATM 68% Post-hoc, sub-group analysis suggests that DCB 12 M Primary Patency may be: Improved with 3 variables Optimal with all 4 variables Transit time < 30 sec 65%

LEVANT 2 PTA Procedural Variable Analysis Final Residual Stenosis < 20% 59% Pressure > Levant 2 sub-group analysis n=29 7 ATM suggests that a similar effect was not observed with PTA 53% n=15 63% 44% n=32 n=45 Inflation time 120 sec

German Sub-Group Analysis

Angiographic Characteristics German vs. non-german Cohorts German Non-German Two Lesions Treated, % (n/n) 1.6% (2/126) 2.6% (9/350) DeNovo Target Vessel, % (n/n) 88.9% (112/126) 83.7% (293/350) Number of Patent Run-Off Vessels 1.7 ± 1.2 (126) 2.1 ± 0.9 (350) Reference Vessel Diameter (RVD), mm 4.8 ± 0.8 (126) 4.8 ± 0.8 (350) Lesion Length, mm 57.7 ± 41.0 (126) 64.7 ± 40.9 (349) Treated Length, mm 100.3 ± 45.5 (126) 110.6 ± 48.3 (350) Total Occlusions, % (n/n) 23.0% (29/126) 20.3% (71/350) Calcification, % (n/n) 60.3% (76/126) 58.3% (204/350) Severe Calcification, % (n/n) 11.1% (14/126) 9.1% (32/350) Most Distal Lesion Location, % (n/n) Proximal SFA 7.1% (9/126) 9.4% (33/350) Mid SFA 51.6% (65/126) 48.6% (170/350) Distal SFA 33.3% (42/126) 32.6% (114/350) Proximal Popliteal 2.4% (3/126) 5.4% (19/350) Mid Popliteal 4.8% (6/126) 3.1% (11/350) Distal Popliteal 0.8% (1/126) 0.9% (3/350)

Procedural Characteristics German vs. non-german Cohorts German Non-German Contralateral Access, % (n/n) 57.9% (73/126) 79.1% (277/350) Predilation Performed (All Lesions), % (n/n) 100.0% (126/126) 100.0% (350/350) Maximum %DS Post-Predilation, Pre-Treatment 41.8 ± 13.0 (121) 40.9 ± 13.1 (347) Total Paclitaxel on DCB Balloons Used per Subject (mg) 3.2 ± 1.6 (83) 3.7 ± 1.8 (233) Transit Time 21.8 ± 11.9 (105) 39.5 ± 29.3 (327) Inflation Time per Balloon (seconds) 129.8 ± 74.3 (157) 167.4 ± 91.7 (455) Max Pressure of Treatment Balloons (atm) 9.0 ± 2.2 (157) 7.7 ± 2.1 (455) Treatment Overstretch (inflated diameter/rvd) 0.9 ± 0.2 (106) 0.9 ± 0.2 (333) Dissections, % (n/n) Grade A 36.5% (46/126) 38.3% (133/347) Grade B 31.7% (40/126) 21.3% (74/347) Grade C 1.6% (2/126) 5.2% (18/347) Post-dilatation PTA, % (n/n) 17.5% (22/126) 22.3% (78/350) Provisional Bailout Stenting, % (n/n) 6.3% (8/126) 3.1% (11/350) Procedural Embolism, % (n/n) 1.6% (2/126) 0.9% (3/350) Diameter Stenosis (post-procedure), %DS 19.4 ± 10.4 (126) 21.5 ± 9.7 (349) Procedural Success (All Lesions), % (n/n) 90.5% (114/126) 87.4% (305/349)

Primary Patency (%) Primary Patency Kaplan Meier Efficacy, Primary Patency Lutonix DCB (N=83) Standard PTA (N=43) Difference P-value @365 days 79.4% 57.8% 21.6% 0.015 Time days Survival % Test DCB Events n at Risk n Survival % Control PTA Events n at Risk n log rank P 30 91.5% 7 74 88.1% 5 37 0.574 183 88.9% 9 68 76.2% 10 30 0.076 365 79.4% 16 50 57.8% 17 19 0.015

Freedom from TLR Kaplan Meier Efficacy, Primary Patency Lutonix DCB (N=83) Standard PTA (N=43) P-value @365 days 96.1% 82.0% 0.012 Time days Survival % Test DCB Events n at Risk n Survival % Control PTA Events n at Risk n log rank P 30 98.8% 1 80 100.0% 0 41 0.480 183 98.8% 1 76 92.6% 3 36 0.080 365 96.1% 3 63 82.0% 7 28 0.012

Global SFA Real-World Registry 12 Month Outcomes

Global SFA Registry Procedural Analysis Balloon Inflation Pressure * (ATM) Final % DS ** 20,9 9,7 7,8 14,6 LEVANT 2 (N=432) Global SFA (N=674) LEVANT 2 (N=316) Global SFA (N=680) * Maximum balloon pressure Mean ± sd (n) ** Maximum % DS Mean ± sd (n)

Lutonix Global SFA Real-World Registry 12 Month Results Measure Lutonix DCB % (n/n) Freedom from TLR 94.3% (595/631) 30 Day Safety 99.7% (677/678)

Lutonix Global SFA Real-World Registry Sub-group Analysis Long Lesions (140 500 mm)

Baseline Lesion Characteristics All Lesions vs Long Lesions (140 500 mm) All Lesions (23 500 mm) Long Lesions (140 500 mm) Total Lesion Length (mm) 101.2 ± 84.2 (685) 212.3 ± 65.3 (140) Treated Length (mm) 136.6 ± 89.7(685) 235.8 ± 74.0 (140) Calcification, % (n/n) 50.2% (238/474) 57.5% (46/80) Total Occlusion, % (n/n) 31.2% (214/686) 42.1% (59/140) Lesion Locations, % (n/n) SFA, % (n/n) 70% (483/690) 66.4% (93/140) Proximal Popliteal, % (n/n) 16.8% (116/690) 15.7% (22/140) Mid & Distal Popliteal, % (n/n) 13.1% (91/690) 17.9% (25/140) %DS post-treatment, % 14.6 ± 18.7 (680) 19.0 ± 21.0 (140) Bail-out Stenting, % (n/n) 25.3% (174/689) 35.7% (50/140) Dissection, % (n/n) 30.1% (135/448) 34.3% (48/140)

12 Month Results All Lesions vs Long Lesions (140 500 mm) Measure All Lesions % (n/n) Long Lesions % (n/n) Freedom from TLR 94.3% (595/631) 93.7% (119/127) 30 Day Safety 99.7% (677/679) 100.0% (138/138)

12 Month Sub-group Analysis All Lesions vs Long Lesions (140 500 mm) Sub-group All Lesions % (n/n) Freedom from TLR Long Lesions % (n/n) Calcification 95.9% (213/222) 97.6% (41/42) CTO 94.8% (184/194) 100.0% (51/51)

12 Month Sub-group Analysis Long Lesions >25cm Sub-Group Freedom from TLR Long Lesions % (n/n) Lesions >25cm 94.0% (47/50) Lesions >25cm - No Bailout Stent 96.0% (24/25) Lesions >25cm - With Bailout Stent 92.0% (23/25) 22

Summary LEVANT 2 post-hoc sub-group analysis suggests that DCB 12 M Primary Patency maybe influenced by balloon Transit time, Inflation Pressure, Inflation Time and Final % Diameter Stenosis LEVANT 2 German cohort suggest that good DCB procedures result in durable long term clinical benefits Global SFA Registry showed favorable Freedom from TLR of at 12 months, including in: females, calcified lesions and CTOs Long Lesions (140 500 mm) Global SFA Regisry interim data suggest sustained benefits at 24 months 23

Latest Insights from the LEVANT II study and sub-group analysis Prof. Dr. med. Dierk Scheinert Division of Interventional Angiology University-Hospital Leipzig, Germany