Supplementary appendix

Similar documents
Supplementary appendix

Who should receive calcium and vitamin D supplementation?

The Auckland calcium study: 5-year post-trial follow-up

TITLE: Vitamin D Supplementation in the Elderly and Long-Term Care Residents: Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines for Use

The effect of vitamin D supplementation on skeletal, vascular, or cancer outcomes: a trial sequential meta-analysis

Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation is an Ineffective Strategy for the Prevention of Fractures in Older People

Emerging Areas Relating Vitamin D to Health

North Central London Joint Formulary Committee

How to Design, Conduct, and Analyze Vitamin D Clinical Trials

Beyond the Break Role of Vitamin D in Nutrition, Bone health and Osteoporosis Clinical: updates & practical considerations

V t i amin i n D a nd n d Calc l iu i m u : Rol o e l in i n Pr P eve v nt n io i n and n d Tr T eatment n of o Fr F actur u es and n d Fa F ll l s

Robin M Daly, Nicole Petrass, Shona Bass, and Caryl A Nowson

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. R. A. Lyons & A. Johansen & S. Brophy & R. G. Newcombe & C. J. Phillips & B. Lervy & R. Evans & K. Wareham & M. D.

Nutrition and Functionality: Key Partners in Ageing

Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation in Systemic Hypertension in Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital, Navi-Mumbai

Vitamin D and Inflammation

Kupu Taurangi Hauora o Aotearoa

Nutritional concepts for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis: what, for whom, when? Objectives

REVIEW ARTICLE. Prevention of Nonvertebral Fractures With Oral Vitamin D and Dose Dependency

Prevention of fractures in older people with calcium and vitamin D

Update on vitamin D. J Chris Gallagher Professor of Medicine and Endocrinology Creighton University Omaha,Nebraska USA

News You Can Use: Recent Studies that Changed My Practice

Effects of vitamin D supplementation on musculoskeletal health: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis

Vitamin D and Calcium Therapy: how much is enough

The Endocrine Society Guidelines

How to Design, Conduct, and Analyze Vitamin D Clinical Trials

Calcium intake and risk of fracture: systematic review

MEDICAL POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/21/14 REVISED DATE: 04/16/15, 06/16/16, 07/20/17 SUBJECT: SCREENING FOR VITAMIN D DEFICIENCY

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 21 July 2010

Coordinator of Post Professional Programs Texas Woman's University 1

Linda Furness, Occupational Therapy Clinical Education Support Officer, Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service Contact:

BAD TO THE BONE. Peter Jones, Rheumatologist QE Health, Rotorua. GP CME Conference Rotorua, June 2008

Importance of Vitamin D in Healthy Ageing. Peter Liu, B Pharmacy Market Development Manager DSM Nutritional Products Asia Pacific 11 th November 2014

permission of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

Management of postmenopausal osteoporosis

1.2 Health states/risk factors affected by the intervention

Calcium Supplementation

THE NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL

Last Review Status/Date: December Summary

IS VITAMIN D IMPORTANT IN THE MANAGEMENT OF TUBERCULOSIS?

MILK. Nutritious by nature. The science behind the health and nutritional impact of milk and dairy foods

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Osteoporos Int. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 March 22.

The Impact of Life Style & Dietary Habits on Vitamin D status Among Young Emiratis. Fatme Al Anouti, Ph.D. Zayed University, Abu Dhabi

Changes in Skeletal Systems over the Lifespan. Connie M. Weaver, Ph.D. Purdue University

28/03/2017. Content. Non-Pharmacological Treatments for Osteoporosis. Managing Pain from A Vertebral Fracture. Traditional Conservative Approach

Author's response to reviews

Robin M. Daly PhD, FASMF

Calcium supplements: benefits and risks

Osteoporosis Management in Older Adults

Alan S. Peterson, M.D. Associate Director, Family & Community Medicine Walter L. Aument Family Health Center

A systematic review of the effects of calcium supplementation on body weight

Advances in Nutrition for Bone Health

Role of evidence from observational studies in the process of health care decision making

Vitamin D and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Bones, Muscles, and Joints

FOR CONSUMERS AND PATIENTS

Systematic Review & Course outline. Lecture (20%) Class discussion & tutorial (30%)

Effective Health Care

Falls prevention strategies for people with visual impairment

Vitamin D: Conflict of Interest Statement Corporate. Outline 7/5/2016

Clinical Policy: Vitamin D Screening Reference Number: CP.MP.HN499

Nutrition for Older people Caryl Nowson Chair Nutrition and Ageing. eplace.

Male osteoporosis: clinical approach and management in family practice

Calcium, Vitamin D and Bisphosphonates: Disclosures. Benefits, Risks and Drug Holiday. Calcium YES or NO? Calcium Bad News!!

Vitamin D for the Prevention of Osteoporotic Fractures

Efficacy of risedronate in men with primary and secondary osteoporosis: results of a 1-year study

Eligibility The NCSF online quizzes are open to any currently certified fitness professional, 18 years or older.

This house believes that HRT should be the first-line prevention for postmenopausal osteoporosis: the case against

Supplementary appendix

Osteoporosis and Nutrition Module 4 Speaking of Bones Osteoporosis For Health Professionals. Susan J Whiting University of Saskatchewan

HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY

Forebyggelse af metabolisk syndrom vha. mejeriprodukter

Nutraceuticals and Cardiovascular Disease: Are we fishing?

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) 2, 3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

Body Mass Index as Predictor of Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women in India

Testing Serum Vitamin D Levels

Review Article. Vitamin D, bones and muscle: myth versus reality

Prevention of falls and fractures

Vitamin D Replacement ROCKY MOUNTAIN MEETING NOV 2013 BANFF W.COKE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

Patricia Anteater.

Vitamin D Supplementation for Pain

Impacting Outcomes With Nutrition

Mary Emmett, PhD, FACHE Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research

Effectiveness and Safety of Vitamin D in Relation to Bone Health

Last Review Status/Date: March Summary

Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment in Type 2 Diabetes

Elecsys bone marker panel. Optimal patient management starts in the laboratory

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 February 10.

A response by Servier to the Statement of Reasons provided by NICE

Calcium intake and bone mineral density: systematic review and meta-analysis

Shon E. Meek, M.D., Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Medicine

Supplementary Online Content

The role of calcium supplementation in healthy musculoskeletal ageing

Non commercial use only

The Elderly: Nutritional Needs, Challenges, Screening, and Solutions

CASE 1 WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO TREAT? FACTS CONCERNS

Objectives. Polypharmacy Seminar. Causes of Polypharmacy. Polypharmacy 8/05/12. National Prescribing Curriculum Module

Skeletal Manifestations

An economic evaluation of community and residential aged care falls prevention strategies in NSW.

Transcription:

Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed. We post it as supplied by the authors. Supplement to: Bolland MJ, Grey A, Gamble GD, Reid IR. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on skeletal, vascular, or cancer outcomes: a trial sequential meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014; published online Jan 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(13)70212-2.

Appendix: Figure 1: Flow of trials Pubmed search (n=463) Trial-level meta-analysis (n=17) -MI/Stroke (n=4) -Cancer (n=3) -Fracture (n=4) -Mortality (n=6) Reports on vitamin D (n=3) RCTs retrieved -56 reports of 52 trials 12 excluded (see Table 1) RCTs eligible for inclusion -44 reports of 40 trials Page 1 of 4

Table1: Trials excluded from analyses and reasons for exclusion Trial Brohult 1973 1 Grove 1981 2 Larsen 2004 3 Campbell 2005 4 Sato 2005 5 Daly 2006 6 Law 2006 7 Moschonis 2006 8 Schleithoff 2006 9 Berggren 2008 10 Wejse 2009 11 Witham 2010 12 Reason for exclusion Population studied: rheumatoid arthritis Other co-intervention: fluoride plus calcium/vitamin D versus placebo. Cluster randomised controlled trial Other co-intervention: exercise plus vitamin D versus home safety programme versus social visits versus exercise plus vitamin D plus home safety programme Data inconsistencies- awaiting clarification from authors Agent: fortified dairy products Cluster randomised controlled trial Agent: fortified dairy products Population studied: congestive heart failure Other co-intervention: falls prevention programme plus calcium/vitamin D versus controls Population studied: tuberculosis Population studied: congestive heart failure References: 1. Brohult J, Jonson B. Effects of large doses of calciferol on patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A doubleblind clinical trial. Scand J Rheumatol 1973; 2:173-6. 2. Grove O, Halver B. Relief of osteoporotic backache with fluoride, calcium, and calciferol. Acta Med Scand 1981; 209:469-71. 3. Larsen ER, Mosekilde L, Foldspang A. Vitamin D and calcium supplementation prevents osteoporotic fractures in elderly community dwelling residents: a pragmatic population-based 3-year intervention study. J Bone Miner Res 2004; 19:370-8. 4. Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, La Grow SJ, Kerse NM, Sanderson GF, Jacobs RJ, et al. Randomised controlled trial of prevention of falls in people aged > or =75 with severe visual impairment: the VIP trial. BMJ 2005; 331:817. 5. Sato Y, Iwamoto J, Kanoko T, Satoh K. Low-dose vitamin D prevents muscular atrophy and reduces falls and hip fractures in women after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005; 20:187-92. 6. Daly RM, Brown M, Bass S, Kukuljan S, Nowson C. Calcium- and vitamin D3-fortified milk reduces bone loss at clinically relevant skeletal sites in older men: a 2-year randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res 2006; 21:397-405. 7. Law M, Withers H, Morris J, Anderson F. Vitamin D supplementation and the prevention of fractures and falls: results of a randomised trial in elderly people in residential accommodation. Age Ageing 2006; 35:482-6. 8. Moschonis G, Manios Y. Skeletal site-dependent response of bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound parameters following a 12-month dietary intervention using dairy products fortified with calcium and vitamin D: the Postmenopausal Health Study. Br J Nutr 2006; 96:1140-8. 9. Schleithoff SS, Zittermann A, Tenderich G, Berthold HK, Stehle P, Koerfer R. Vitamin D supplementation improves cytokine profiles in patients with congestive heart failure: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 83:754-9. 10. Berggren M, Stenvall M, Olofsson B, Gustafson Y. Evaluation of a fall-prevention program in older people after femoral neck fracture: a one-year follow-up. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19:801-9. 11. Wejse C, Gomes VF, Rabna P, Gustafson P, Aaby P, Lisse IM, et al. Vitamin D as supplementary treatment for tuberculosis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009; 179:843-50. 12. Witham MD, Crighton LJ, Gillespie ND, Struthers AD, McMurdo ME. The effects of vitamin D supplementation on physical function and quality of life in older patients with heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. Circ Heart Fail 2010; 3:195-201. Page 2 of 4

Table 2: Subgroup analyses of traditional meta-analysis by baseline and achieved 25OHD levels, and by duration of trial. Baseline 25OHD (nmol/l) Baseline/Achieved 25OHD (nmol/l) Duration of trial <50 50 Missing <50/<50 <50/ 50 50/ 50 Missing 2 years >2 years Myocardial infarction/ischaemic heart disease Studies 5 1 3-5 1 3 3 6 Participants (N) 44,324 892 3471-44,324 892 3471 821 47,866 RR (95% CI) 4 (0.92-1.17) 0 (0.25-8.93) 1.30 (0.67-2.52) - 4 (0.92-1.17) 0 (0.25-8.93) 1.30 (0.67-2.52) 1.90 (0.77-4.71) 1 (0.92-1.12) P (interaction) 0.74 0.74 0.17 Stroke/Cerebrovascular disease Studies 4 1 3-4 1 3 3 5 Participants (N) 42,068 892 3471-42,068 892 3471 821 45,610 RR (95% CI) 0 (0.88-1.13) 1.20 (0.37-3.9) 5 (0.82-1.35) - 0 (0.88-1.13) 1.20 (0.37-3.9) 5 (0.82-1.35) 1.10 (6-2.17) 0 (0.90-1.13) P (interaction) 0.89 0.89 0.80 Cancer Studies 4 1 2-4 1 2 1 6 Participants (N) 44,132 892 3144-44,132 892 3144 302 47,865 RR (95% CI) 0.98 (0.92-4) 0.76 (0.38-5) 0.88 (0.40-1.93) - 0.98 (0.92-4) 0.76 (0.38-5) 0.88 (0.40-1.93) 0.20 (2-1.69) 0.99 (0.93-5) P (interaction) 0.76 0.76 0.14 Total fracture Studies 12 4 6 2 10 4 6 9 13 Participants (N) 55,640 10,194 10,663 353 55,287 10,194 10,663 3520 76,497 RR (95% CI) 0.97 (0.90-6) 0.75 (0.43-1.31) 0.87 (0.77-0.98) 0.38 (0.14-5) 0.98 (0.91-6) 0.75 (0.43-1.31) 0.87 (0.77-0.98) 0.85 (0.70-4) 0.96 (0.89-4) P (interaction) 0.24 0.10 0.28 Hip fracture- Vitamin D Studies 7 1 4 2 5 1 4 4 8 Participants (N) 11,670 9440 6724 278 11,392 9440 6724 1544 26,290 RR (95% CI) 9 (0.91-1.32) 0 (2-2.19) 1 (0.80-1.28) 0.44 (7-2.93) 1.10 (0.92-1.33) 0 (2-2.19) 1 (0.80-1.28) 5 (0.73-3) 1.12 (0.97-1.30) P (interaction) 0.23 0.28 0.77 Hip fracture- calcium/vitamin D Studies 6 1 2 1 5 1 2 2 7 Participants (N) 46,317 389 3384 112 46,205 389 3384 695 49,395 RR (95% CI) 0.84 (0.74-0.97) 0.36 (2-8.79) 0.73 (0.33-1.63) 0.49 (3-7.70) 0.85 (0.72-0) 0.36 (2-8.79) 0.73 (0.33-1.63) 0.64 (0.37-8) 0.85 (0.75-0.98) P (interaction) 0.82 0.91 0.29 Mortality Studies 22 8 8 2 20 8 8 23 15 Participants (N) 57,843 12,180 11,150 355 57,488 12,180 11,150 9958 71,215 RR (95% CI) 0.93 (0.88-0.99) 0.98 (0.85-1.13) 0.98 (0.93-4) 1.37 (0.80-2.35) 0.93 (0.88-0.98) 0.98 (0.85-1.13) 0.98 (0.93-4) 0.96 (0.88-6) 0.96 (0.92-0) P (interaction) 0.41 0.29 0.96 Abbreviations: 25OHD- 25- hydroxyvitamin D; RR- relative risk; CI confidence interval Page 3 of 4

Figure 2: Funnel Plots of Traditional Meta-analyses Funnel Plot of by Myocardial infarction P=6 Funnel Plot of by Total fracture P=2 - - - - - - - - Funnel Plot of by Stroke P=7 Funnel Plot of by Vitamin D Hip fracture P= - - - - - - - - Funnel Plot of by Cancer P=5 Funnel Plot of by Vitamin D/Calcium Hip fracture P= - - - - - - - - Funnel Plot of by Mortality P=0.3 - - - - P-values are for Egger s test. Page 4 of 4