RANGER SFA REGISTRY Interim Analysis. Bernd Gehringhoff, MD On behalf the Ranger SFA Registry Investigators

Similar documents
Michael K.W. Lichtenberg, MD

Contemporary use of DCBs, Ranger clinical trial and investigator sponsored research

Update on the Ranger clinical trial programme

Michael K. W. Lichtenberg MD, FESC on behalf of KANSHAS 1 investigators; Tepe G, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Deloose K, Verbist J, Goverde P, Zeller T

Dierk Scheinert, MD. Department of Angiology University Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Long Lesions: Primary stenting or DCB first? John Laird MD Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St. Helena, CA

Latest Insights from the LEVANT II study and sub-group analysis

BIOLUX P-III Passeo-18 Lux All-comers Registry: 12-month Results for the All-Comers Cohort

Evolving Role of Drug-Eluting Stents In Complex SFA - Majestic Trial Data

COMPARE-Pilot RCT: 1-year results of a randomised comparison of RANGER DCB vs. IN.PACT DCB in complex SFA lesions. Dierk Scheinert

Clinical Data Update for Drug Coated Balloons (DCB) Seung-Whan Lee, MD, PhD

BioMimics 3D in my Clinical Practice

Outcomes Of DCB Use In Real World Registries: 2 Year Results From The INPACT Global Registry

Maximizing Outcomes in a complex population with Drug-coated balloon

January 23, Vascular and oncological interventional radiology Paris Descartes University

6-month 0utcomes of a Novel Sirolimus Coated DCB Technology Evaluated in SFA Thomas Zeller, MD University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen

Drug- Coated Balloons for the SFA: Overview of Technology and Results

EffPac - Trial: Assessment of the Effectiveness of DCB versus POBA in the SFA Ulf Teichgräber, MD, MBA

Making BTK Interventions more Durable: Are DES and DCB the answer? Thomas Zeller, MD

ISR-treatment The Leipzig experience with purely mechanical debulking. Sven Bräunlich Department for Angiology University-Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Endovascular Therapy vs. Open Femoral Endarterectomy Rationale and Design of the Randomized PESTO Trial

12-month Outcomes of Post Dilatation in the IN.PACT Global CTO Cohort. Gunnar Tepe, MD RodMed Clinic Rosenheim Rosenheim, Germany

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Insights from the IN.PACT Global Full Clinical Cohort

Vessel Preparation: What does it mean and what are the current tools? Lawrence Garcia, MD St. Elizabeth s Medical Center Boston, MA, USA

ILLUMENATE FIH Direct DCB Cohort 12-Month Results

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Clinical use and safety of the Lutonix DCB for the treatment of BTK: interim data from a prospective registry

Atherectomy is Still Live and Effective. John R. Laird, MD Professor of Medicine Medical Director of the Vascular Center UC Davis Health System

- Our patients with iliofemoral DVT - Effective thrombus removal with purely mechanical thrombectomy can lead to better outcomes

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

DEB in Periphery: What we Know Till Now

Update on the Levant 2 Clinical Trial Programme. Dierk Scheinert, MD University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig, Germany

Could a combination of DCB + stent be the answer in complex SFA lesions

Promise and limitations of DCB in long lesions What Have we Learned from Clinical Trials? Ramon L. Varcoe, MBBS, MS, FRACS, PhD

Do we really need a stent in long SFA lesions? No: DEB is the answer

Patency rates and clinical results of the Veniti VICI Stent for treatment of iliac vein lesion Data from the Arnsberg Venous Registry

BTK Intervention with Drug- Coated Balloons: Past Lessons and Future Exploration

Venous stent experience in Arnsberg Michael K. W. Lichtenberg MD, FESC

Nicolas W Shammas, MD, MS

ILLUMENATE Pivotal Stellarex DCB IDE Study 12-Month Results

The BATTLE Trial Comparing Bare Metal to Drug Eluting Stents for Intermediate Length Lesions of the SFA

PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL RESTENOSIS

TOBA II 12-Month Results Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty

BIOFLEX PEACE Registry

Alternative concepts for drug delivery in BTK arteries the LIMBO project

The Freeway Stent Study: the 12 Months results highly favor the use of DEB in combination with stenting

Future Algorithm for Lower Extremity Revascularization: Where Does Vessel Prep Fit?

REKANALISATION CHRONISCH VENÖSER VERSCHLÜSSE. Michael K. W. Lichtenberg, FESC

Real PTX RCT: 3 year data from a randomized comparison of DCB vs. DES in femoropopliteal lesions

Importance of Thorough Vessel Preparation Followed By Anti- Restenotic Therapy: An Update from the DEFINITIVE AR Study

Disclosures. In the DCB Era, How Do I Choose To Use a Stent? When to Stent and What Devices to Use in the SFA

Fabrizio Fanelli, MD, EBIR Director Vascular and Interventional Radiology Department "Careggi " University Hospital Florence - Italy

Preliminary 12 Months results of the RAPID trial

New Data to Shape the Era of Drug Elution in Peripheral Interventions

REACT Treatment Rationale and Clinical Evidence. ICI Meeting 5th of December 2017

DCB use in fem-pop lesions of patients with CLI (RCC 4-5): subgroup analysis of IN.PACT Global 12-month outcomes

Novel concept for drug delivery in infrapopliteal arteries The LIMBO trial

Lessons learnt from DES in the SFA is there any ideal concept so far?

The drug-eluting balloon superficial femoral artery-long study THE DEB SFA-LONG STUDY

Department of Radiology. EffPac - Trial:

Clinical results of venous stents. Michael K. W. Lichtenberg MD, FESC

NCT Teichgräber et al. Trials (2016) DOI /s x

Update from Korea on the Lutonix SFA registry 12 month data

The drug-eluting balloon superficial femoral artery-long study THE DEB SFA-LONG STUDY

Current Status and Limitations in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis

2 Year Results from the MDT SFA Japan Trial - DCB vs. standard PTA for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the SFA/PPA

The importance of scientific evidence. Prof. I. Baumgartner Head Clinical & Interventional Angiology University Hospital Bern

Update on the OPTIMIZE BTK Trial. Marianne Brodmann, MD Division of Angiology Medical University Graz, Austria

EffPac RCT: final 6-month results with the Luminor DCB

The latest evidences from the DES trials in peripheral arterial disease

Lutonix DCB in BTK Update on the BTK real world registry and RCT

Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty. Thomas Zeller MD Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg & Bad Krozingen, Germany

Luminor DCB in femoropopliteal lesions

Are Drug-coated balloons Durable? Level 1 evidence review. Koen Keirse, MD Vascular Surgery, RZ Tienen Tienen, Belgium

Best DCB outcomes in SFA TASC A&B lesions: EFFPAC-RCT 12-months follow-up

The latest generation DEB

One Year after In.Pact Deep: Lessons learned from a failed trial. Prof. Dr. Thomas Zeller

First time data release: Initial experience with the temporary Spur Stent System: DEEPER Trial first-in-man results Jihad A. Mustapha, MD, FACC,

Why and where do I use mechanical debulking for the treatment of arterial occlusions?

12-Month and preliminary 24-month outcomes of combining a DCB with a modern generation of nitinol stent in fem-pop lesions. BIOLUX 4EVER study

BIOLUX 4EVER : Combining Passeo-18 Lux DCB and Pulsar-18 BMS : 12 month results of full cohort

Christian Wissgott MD, PhD Assistant Director, Radiology Westküstenkliniken Heide

Klinikum Rosenheim Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology

Atherectomy: Jetstream and Directional. George S. Chrysant, M.D.

The ZILVERPASS study a randomized study comparing ZILVER PTX stenting with Bypass in femoropopliteal lesions Preliminary report

Cutting/scoring balloon Cryoplasty Drug-eluting balloon Brachytherapy Debulking Restent (BMS or DES) John R. Laird, MD

IN ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA FAILURE

The Illumina FIH study with a next generation DES 12-months results

Michael K. W. Lichtenberg, MD, FESC Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster. Dierk Scheinert, M.D. Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR

Update on Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) Below the Knee. Marianne Brodmann, MD Medical University Graz Graz, Austria

Drug eluting stents and balloons in peripheral arterial disease A.T.O. ABDOOL-CARRIM UNIVERSITY OF WITWATERSRAND

Clearing a Path for the Effective Treatment of Complex Arterial and Venous Disease

Massimiliano Fusaro, MD on behalf of ISAR-STATH Investigators. Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München Munich - Germany

How do I use mechanical debulking for the treatment of arterial occlusions

Complex ilio-caval revascularization in chronic venous obstruction with the Venovo Stent. Michael K. W. Lichtenberg MD, FESC

The Crack and Pave technique for highly resistant calcified lesions. Manuela Matschuck MD University Hospital Leipzig Department Angiology

Device Evolution. Atherectomy: Where Do We Stand After 12 Years Since FDA Clearance. Where Do We Stand? 4/18/2015

DCB in my practice: How the evidence influences my strategy. Yang-Jin Park

Long-term results with interwoven nitinol stents vs. BMS vs. DCB

Are DES and DEB worth the cost in BTK interventions?

Transcription:

RANGER SFA REGISTRY Interim Analysis Bernd Gehringhoff, MD On behalf the Ranger SFA Registry Investigators

Conflict of Interest - Disclosure Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s) listed below. Affiliation/Financial Relationship Company 1. Honoraria for lectures: CR Bard, Veniti, AB Medica, Volcano, Optimed GmbH, Straub Medical, Terumo, Biotronik, Veryan 2. Honoraria for advisory board activities: Veniti, Optimed GmbH, Straub Medical, Biotronik, Veryan, Boston Scientific 3. Participation in clinical trials: Biotronik, CR Bard, Veryan, Straub Medical, Veniti, TVA Medical, Boston Scientific, LimFlow 4. Research funding: Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Veryan, Veniti, AB medica

Next Generation DCB: Boston Scientific Ranger Sterling balloon platform TransPax TM coating technology Paclitaxel Ranger TM DCB Loading Tool Designed to protect the drug coating Size matrix: SFA: 4-8 mm; 30-100 mm BTK: 2-4 mm; up to 150 mm

Investigator Sponsored Research Ranger Drug Coated Balloon Indication Expansion Haemodialysis AVF Rescue Prospective, multicentre, RCT 1:1 N = 200 SFA RCT Prospective, RCT 1:1 (Head to Head) N = 150 Confirmatory SFA Registry Prospective, multicentre, registry N = ~180 Exploratory BTK Angiographic Feasibility, observational, angio F/U N= 30 BTK Clinical Prospective, RCT 1:1 (Ranger vs PTA) N = 70 These investigator-sponsored studies are supported by grant funding from Boston Scientific. Boston Scientific is not responsible for the collection, analysis or reporting of these studies which remain the sole responsibility of the investigators. Information for the use in countries with applicable product

Ranger SFA Registry Ranger All-Comer Registry Treatment of femoro-popliteal atherosclerotic lesions using the Drug eluting Balloon Ranger: An All Comers Registry PI Design Centres Population Primary Safety Endpoint Primary Efficacy Endpoint Key Inclusion Criteria Michael Lichtenberg Multicentre, prospective all comer registry Germany (Dr. von Bilderling (Munich), Dr. Ranft, Dr. Niemöller (Bottrop), Dr. Grell (Trier), Dr. Lichtenberg (Arnsberg) and Switzerland (Dr. Saucy, Lausanne) Planned 180 patients Major Adverse Events (MAE): composite of device or procedure related mortality and major target limb amputation at 6 months Primary patency at 12 and 24 months, defined as freedom from 50% restenosis as indicated by duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) 2.4 in the target lesion with no re-intervention PAOD SFA PIII, Rutherford II - V Study is sponsored by Klinikum Arnsberg

Standard of practice DCB transit time: < 30 sec. DCB inflation time: > 90 sec., optimal 180 sec. DCB / angiographic vessel diameter: 1

Ranger SFA Registry Interim- Patient Demographics Ranger DCB N 149 Mean Age (years) 70 Male 63 % ABI 0.60 (0.01-1.43) General Medical History Diabetes mellitus 34 % Hyperlipidemia 94 % Hypertension 93 % Smoking Current 34 % Previous 44 % Renal History Renal disease 19 % Rutherford stage I 3% II 17 % III 66 % IV 7 % V 6% VI 1 % Study is sponsored by Klinikum Arnsberg

Ranger SFA Registry Interim - Lesion Characteristics Ranger DCB Lesion (N) 210 SFA Prox 68 SFA Mid 103 SFA Distal 99 POP Prox 61 POP Mid 43 POP Distal 12 Lesion length (mm) 135 mm (50 400 mm) Calcification low 74% moderate 23% severe 3% Percent diameter stenosis 91 % ± 10 % TASCII A 20% B 21% C 21% D 38% Study is sponsored by Klinikum Arnsberg

Ranger SFA Registry Interim-Procedure Characteristics Procedure TLD Number 1 69% 2 20% 3 6% 4 2.5% 5 0.5% Predilatation before DCB 80.2% Ranger DCB avg. inflation time (sec) 114 Bail out stent rate 27% Procedure Outcomes Technical success for DCB only (no flow limiting dissection) 73% Procedural success DCB plus adjunctive therapy (stent) 100% Residual angiographic stenosis 12% Study is sponsored by Klinikum Arnsberg

Stents used in DCB studies Longer mean lesion length in DCB studies is correlated with higher provisional stenting rate Ranger SFA Registry Provisional Stenting in Randomized Controlled Trials may not be representative of actual stenting in studies due to study design Results from different trials are not directly comparable. Information provided for educational purposes. 1 Werk M et al. Circulation 2008; 2 Werk et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 3 Tepe G et al. N Engl J Med 2008; 4 icari A Et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2012; 5 Tepe et al. Circulation 2015; 6 Zeller T et al. J Endovasc Therapy 2014; 7 Schmidt A. LINC 2013; 8 Schroeder H et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 9 Laird J. Endovacsular Today Feb 2015. 10 Ansel G. TCT 2015.

Primary Patency (%) Ranger SFA Registry - Interim Primary Patency 6M Primary Patency of 91% at 6M PP 91% at 6M Time (Month) Study is sponsored by Klinikum Arnsberg

Ranger SFA Registry - Interim Safety Freedom from TLR 6M 92% freedom from TLR at 6M by Kaplan Meier Estimate ftlr 92% at 6M Time (Month) Study is sponsored by Klinikum Arnsberg

Patient Outcomes 91% of patients moved up at least 1 Rutherford category at 6M 80% of patients moved up 2 Rutherford categories at 6M 100% Rutherford Category 80% 6 5 60% 40% 4 3 2 1 20% 0% Baseline (N=147) 6 Months (N=105) Study is sponsored by Klinikum Arnsberg

ABI (-) Patient Outcomes Statistically significant difference for the affected limb from baseline to 6M 1.2 p < 0.01 ABI improvement (through 6 months) 1 0.8 0.879 0.822 0.856 0.6 0.583 0.4 0.2 0 Baseline 6 months Baseline 6 months Affected limb Contralateral limb Study is sponsored by Klinikum Arnsberg

Conclusions The Ranger DCB shows promising results in the real world setting. Interim data from the Ranger All Comer Registry showed: 92% freedom from TLR at 6 months 91% primary patency at 6 months DCB 12 M Primary Patency may be positively influenced by procedural variables - Balloon Transit time, Inflation Pressure, Inflation Time and Final % Diameter Stenosis

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

RANGER SFA REGISTRY Interim Analysis Bernd Gehringhoff, MD On behalf the Ranger SFA Registry Investigators