Optimization of antibodies, selection, protocols and controls Breast tumours

Similar documents
Breast cancer: Antibody selection, protocol optimzation controls and EQA

External Quality Assessment of Breast Marker Analysis. NordiQC data

SMH (Myosin, smooth muscle heavy chain)

Assessment Run GATA3

Assessment Run B HER-2 IHC. HER-2/chr17 ratio**

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)

Assessment Run B HER2 IHC

Estrogen receptor (ER)

Assessment Run

Estrogen receptor (ER)

Assessment Run B HER2 IHC

Assessment Run C1 2017

Cytokeratin 19 (CK19)

Estrogen receptor (ER)

Assessment Run NKX3.1 (NKX3.1)

Assessment Run C3 2018

Thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF1) Assessment run

NordiQC External Quality Assurance in Immunohistochemistry

Lung Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (lu-alk)

Quality Assurance in Immunohistochemistry: Experiences from NordiQC

10 years of NordiQC Why are 30% of labs still getting it wrong?

The impact of proficiency testing on lab immunoassays

Epithelial cell-cell adhesion molecule (Ep-CAM)

Assessment Run CK19

Sal-like protein 4 (SALL4)

Breast cancer: IHC classification. Mogens Vyberg Professor of Clinical Pathology Director of NordiQC Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

HER2 ISH (BRISH or FISH)

NordiQC - update

Nordic Immunohistochemical Quality Control

External Quality Assessment of melanocytic marker analyses NordiQC experience

Immunohistochemical principles The technical test approach. Pre-analytical parametres

Assessment Run B HER-2

The unkown primary tumour: IHC Classification, antibody selection, protocol optimization, controls and EQA (part I)

The unknown primary tumour: IHC classification part I, the primary panel - Antibody selection, protocol optimization, controls and EQA

Product Introduction. Product Codes: HCL029, HCL030 and HCL031. Issue

IHC Stainer platforms. Overview, pros and cons

Immunohistochemical classification of lung carcinomas and mesotheliomas. Prof. Mogens Vyberg NordiQC Institute of Pathology Aalborg, Denmark

Diagnostic IHC in lung and pleura pathology

Image analysis in IHC overview, considerations and applications

Immunohistochemistry. Potential and challenges To be or not to be

DOUBLE STAINS. Toll-Free: Direct:

The unkown primary tumour: IHC Classification, antibody selection, protocol optimization, controls and EQA (part II)

Single and Multiplex Immunohistochemistry

Product Introduction

Breast cancer diagnostic solutions Deliver diagnostic confidence

HistoCyte Laboratories Ltd

The Panel Approach to Diagnostics. Lauren Hopson International Product Specialist Cell Marque Corporation

Immunocytochemistry. Run 119/48. Improving Immunocytochemistry for Over 25 Years Results - Summary Graphs - Pass Rates Best Methods - Selected Images

PD-L1 Analyte Control DR

Immunohistochemical classification of the unknown primary tumour (UPT) Part I. Prof. Mogens Vyberg NordiQC Institute of Pathology Aalborg, Denmark

Immunohistochemical classification of breast tumours

HPV/p16 Analyte Control

What kind of material should we use for ICC in our daily routine. Torill Sauer Department of Pathology, Akershus University Hospital

IDH1 R132H/ATRX Immunohistochemical validation

Immunotherapy in NSCLC Pathologist role

Assessment performed on Tuesday, July 29, 2014, at Lions Gate Hospital, North Vancouver

Classification of the unknown primary tumour: the primary IHC panel

Present Role of Immunohistochemistry in the. Subtypes. Beppe Viale European Institute of Oncology University of Milan Milan-Italy

# Best Practices for IHC Detection and Interpretation of ER, PR, and HER2 Protein Overexpression in Breast Cancer

Recent advances in breast cancers

Milestones in Her 2 Testing

Quality Control/Quality Assurance in Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry

COMPUTER-AIDED HER-2/neu EVALUATION IN EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE (EQA) OF BREAST CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMME

Results you can trust

Instant Quality FISH. The name says it all.

Epithelia will be discussed according to the following scheme: Type Number of layers Shape Line drawing. Squamous Cuboidal Columnar

HER2 CISH pharmdx TM Kit Interpretation Guide Breast Cancer

Workflow. Connecting the Pieces For Total Patient Care

Supplementary Online Content

Predictive markers for treatment with Immune checkpoint inhibitors - PD-L1 et al -

Immunohistochemical Expression of Hormone Receptors and The Histological Characteristics of Biochemically Hormone Receptor Negative Breast Cancers

Protocols for Zytomed Systems antibodies on fully automated IHC staining systems date of issue: September 20, 2012

Dr. dr. Primariadewi R, SpPA(K)

Immunohistochemistry and Bladder Tumours

Urinary Bladder: WHO Classification and AJCC Staging Update 2017

Review and Updates of Immunohistochemistry in Selected Salivary Gland and Head and Neck Tumors

Assessment performed on Friday, September 18, 2015, at Vancouver General Hospital

4/12/2018. MUSC Pathology Symposium Kiawah Island April 18, Jesse K. McKenney, MD

EQA for PD-L1 IHC staining: is it a conundrum? Keith Miller

Mammaglobin vs GCDFP-15 An Immunohistologic Validation Survey for Sensitivity and Specificity

VENTANA PD-L1 (SP142) Assay Guiding immunotherapy

Aspects of quality in breast pathology. Andrew Lee Nottingham University Hospitals

The Challenges of Implementing a PD-L1 Proficiency Testing Program in Australia

In Situ Hybridization: Market Strategies and Forecasts, US,

Immunocytochemistry. Run 113/42. Improving Immunocytochemistry for Over 25 Years Results - Summary Graphs - Pass Rates Best Methods - Selected Images

Vernieuwing en diagnostiek bij NSCLC: Immunotherapy: PD-L1 analyse: waar staan we

Histological Type. Morphological and Molecular Typing of breast Cancer. Nottingham Tenovus Primary Breast Cancer Study. Survival (%) Ian Ellis

Coordinate Expression of Cytokeratins 7 and 20 in Prostate Adenocarcinoma and Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma

ONCO TEAM DIAGNOSTIC

NSCLC. Harmonization study 1. Lung cancer and other malignancies -PD-L1 assay, QuIP EQA

Optimal algorithm for HER2 testing

FISH mcgh Karyotyping ISH RT-PCR. Expression arrays RNA. Tissue microarrays Protein arrays MS. Protein IHC

Interpretation Manual - Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma. PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmdx is FDA-approved for in vitro diagnostic use

Applications of IHC. Determination of the primary site in metastatic tumors of unknown origin

Supplemental Data Table 1 Characteristics of the MHH BC cohort number percent cases histology IDBC ILBC others 6 3 pt status pt1

Cluster designation 5 staining of normal and non-lymphoid neoplastic skin*

Thermo Scientific UltraVision Quanto for Immunohistochemistry The New Generation Micro-Polymer Detection System

A National Quality Assurance program for breast immunohistochemistry: an Italian perspective

Assessment of Breast Cancer with Borderline HER2 Status Using MIP Microarray

Transcription:

Optimization of antibodies, selection, protocols and controls Breast tumours Søren Nielsen Project coordinator & Scheme Manager NordiQC Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark

Breast panel: GCDFP-15 Mammaglobin Gata 3 Smooth MHCM ASMA (p63) E-cadherin p120 ER PR HER-2 Is it primary breast? Is it invasive? Is it lobular or ductal? Which teraphy?

Breast panel: GCDFP-15 Mammaglobin Gata 3 Smooth MHCM ASMA (p63) E-cadherin p120 ER PR HER-2 Is it primary breast? Is it invasive? Is it lobular or ductal? Which teraphy?

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1 4 7 10 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 46 Generel App. 600-700 laboratories in total > 70 countries Breast HER-2 ISH

Focus: Appropriate technical quality; signal-to-noise, morphology etc Appropriate analytical sensitivity and specificity indicated by concordance of ER status in the included tumours to reference

Uterine cervix Tonsil Breast carc. high Breast carc. low Breast carc. negative

2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2016

strogen receptor; ass rate influenced by participation 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2016 New participants Old participants Run B10, 2004 57% (n=61) 71% (n=134) Run B15, 2010 70% (n=54) 86% (n=208) Run B19, 2015 51% (n=86) 73% (n=259)

Estrogen receptor; Pass rate influenced by protocol harmonization 2003 B8 2013 B15 Titre range / average titre 1:10-1.000 / 1:125 1:10-400 / 1:90 HIER by in-house buffer 88% 6% HIER by high ph 70% 94% Polymer/multimer kit 56% 93% Fully automated system 6% 59%

2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

HIER alk. ph 2- & 3-step kits Carefully calib. Uterine cervix; all epithelial cells Tonsil; scattered T-cells

Estrogen receptor; 85% Weak / False negative 10% False positive 5% Impaired morphology, etc Suf. Ins. Too low titre (EP1, SP1 conc.) Insufficient HIER, Clone 1D5 Clone 6F11 by HIER at high ph, 3-step pol. (not observed on VMS) Clone 1D5 at high titre, Biotin-based kits, HIER in pressure cooker

Breast panel: Estrogen Receptor Basic protocol settings for an optimal staining result (NQC) Retrieval Titre Detection RTU Detection mab 1D5 HIER High 1:25-50 2- & 3-step Dako 2- & 3-step mab 6F11* HIER Ci, High 1:50-200 2- & 3-step Leica 3-step rmab EP1 HIER High 1:25 30 2- & 3-step Dako 2- & 3-step rmab SP1 HIER High 1:30-100 2- & 3-step Ventana 2- & 3-step * Efficient HIER, high conc., 3-step pol. & low stringent washing can give aberrant nuclear staining Not seen on Ventana stainer, rarely on Autostainer and most commonly on Bond stainer. Use uterine cervix and tonsil to verify level of sensitivity and specificity;

Focus: Appropriate technical quality; signal-to-noise, morphology etc Appropriate analytical sensitivity and specificity indicated by concordance of PR status in the included tumours to reference

Uterine cervix Can vary. Tonsil Breast carc. high Breast carc. low Breast carc. negative

2004 2006 2007 2008 2010 2011 2012 2014 2015

2004 2006 2007 2008 2010 2011 2012 2014

HIER alk. ph 2- & 3-step kits Carefully calib. Uterine cervix all columnar epith. cells, and majority of basal squam. epith. cells (can be neg. in some pts).

Progesterone receptor; 75% Weak / False negative 20% False positive 5% Impaired morphology, etc Tonsil Suf. Ins. Too low titre (16, PgR636) Insufficient HIER Clone SP2 and 1E2. 1E2 mainly by off-label protocol (ext. sensitivity) Clone 1A6, Biotin-based kits, HIER in pressure cooker

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours Breast panel: Progesterone Receptor Basic protocol settings for an optimal staining result (NQC) Retrieval Titre Detection RTU Detection mab 16 HIER High 1:75-800 2- & 3-step Leica 3-step mab PGR636* HIER (High) 1:100-800 2- & 3-step Dako 3-step mab PGR1294 HIER (High) 1:250 5.000 2- & 3-step Dako 2-step rmab 1E2** HIER High - - Ventana 2-step * mab clone PGR636 has shown to be less successful on Ventana BenchMark Ultra ** rmab clone 1E2, RTU might provide aberrant false pos. result by 3-step protocols, reduced HIER and prolonged Ab incubation time compared to Ventana guidelines Use uterine cervix and tonsil to verify level of sensitivity and specificity;

Focus: Appropriate technical quality; signal-to-noise, morphology etc Appropriate analytical sensitivity and specificity indicated by concordance to FISH status and IHC level established by reference data in all the included tumours.

Material processed according to ASCO/CAP

> CK7 6.0 2.3 2.6 1.3 1.7 1.1 1.4 Optimal Ampl. 3+ Ampl. 2+ Unampl. 2+ Unampl. 0 Poor 10-20% HER2+ found in 2+ cat. Ampl. 3+ Ampl. 1+ Unampl. 1+ Unampl. 0 23

> CK7 6.0 2.3 2.6 1.3 1.7 1.1 1.4 Optimal Ampl. 3+ Ampl. 2+ Unampl. 2+ Unampl. 0 Poor Ampl. 3+ Ampl. 2+ Unampl. 3+ Unampl. 1 24

App 90 % of insuff. results are FN and seen both by FDA / CE-IVD kits and laboratory developed assays. FP results have virtually only been seen by laboratory developed assays. 25

Typical causes for insufficient results in the NordiQC HER2 IHC breast module: FDA / CE-IVD HER2 IHC kits: PATHWAY, Ventana: Too short HIER (<24M) and/or too short incubation of primary Ab (<12M) HercepTest, Dako: Too short HIER (<40M) and/or too short incubation of primary & secondary Ab (<30M) Oracle, Leica: No single or combination of causes have been identified Laboratory developed assays: Inappropriate titre of primary Ab, less successful primary Ab, insufficient HIER, etc.. 26

Control material for HER2 IHC: performace control / consistency Histology: 3+ tumour Cell lines: 3+ 2+ tumour 2+ Applicable for DIA & ref data comparing run-to-run

Control material for HER2 IHC: performace control / consistency Histocyte cell lines HER2: Horizon cell lines HER2 0,99 0,99 0,99 0,87 0,66 0,85 0,13 0,15 0,24 0,30 0,15 0,34 Pathway Oracle Herceptest Pathway Oracle HercepTest

CK7 ISH: 2.5-2.8 ISH: 1.3-1.7 Optimal Ampl. 3+ Ampl. 2+ Unampl. 2+ Unampl. 0 ISH: 2.5-2.8 Good Increased need for additional ISH Ampl. 3+ Ampl. 2+ Unampl. 2+ Unampl. 2+ 30

31

5% didn t return slides for BRISH due to technical errors. 32

Technically optimal results in the NordiQC HER2 ISH breast module: INFORM HER2 Dual ISH, Ventana ZytoDot 2C, ZytoVision HER2 black chr17 red HER2 green chr17 red U A 33

Typical causes for insufficient results in the NordiQC HER2 ISH breast module: FDA / CE-IVD HER2 BRISH (CISH/DDISH/etc) kits: INFORM HER2 Dual ISH, Ventana: Excessive proteolysis (>16M), HIER in CC1. DuoCISH pharmdx, Dako: Insufficient proteolysis, inappropriate handling of chromogen. ZytoDot 2C, ZytoVision: Excessive proteolysis. In 90% of insufficient results, no single or combination of causes could be identified 34

Technically insufficient results in the NordiQC HER2 ISH breast module: INFORM HER2 Dual ISH, Ventana HER2 black chr17 red Excessive protelysis U Neg areas >25% Silver precip. U 35

90% of ins. results used approriate protocol. 36

What is faint? Visible at 40X? What is weak? Visible at 10X? Up to 20-40% HER2 IHC tests are reflexed to ISH due to expanded criteria for 2+ (internal data)

From a technical point of view, it might be critical to change from a robust and relatively simple IHC assay to a less robust and complex test and simultanously more expensive test 38

HER2 Gene-Protein-Assay (Roche): HER2 IHC + DDISH no EQA data yet. 39

Slightly higher concordance regarding interpretation for FISH

Conclusions: 1. Pass rates for ER, PR and HER2 IHC are improved. Robust clones, high quality IHC systems. 2. CE-IVD labelled RTU assays / systems have shown superior performance compared to laboratory developed assays. 3. HER2 BRISH (DDISH/SISH/CISH) results have not been improved.

Breast panel: GCDFP-15 Mammaglobin Gata 3 Smooth MHCM ASMA (p63) E-cadherin p120 ER PR HER-2 Is it primary breast? Is it invasive? Is it lobular or ductal? Which teraphy?

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours GCDFP15 / Mammaglobin reaction pattern A moderate to strong, distinct cytoplasmic staining reaction in scattered ductal epithelial cells and in apocrine metaplastic cells. Breast Skin Tonsil A moderate to strong, distinct cytoplasmic staining reaction of the majority of the epithelial cells of the eccrine sweat glands No staining reaction should be seen.

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours GCDFP15 / Mammaglobin reaction pattern Antigen diffusion Carc. 4 Carc. 4 44

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours Local diffusion

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours GCDFP15 / Mammaglobin reaction pattern Carc. 1 - Mammaglobin Carc. 2 - Mammaglobin 46

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours GCDFP15 / Mammaglobin reaction pattern Tandem application Carc. 3 - Mammaglobin Carc. 3 - GCDFP15 47

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours Ins.: Omission of HIER and/or too low conc. RTU > Conc. (difficult to calibrate what is best control )

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours Ins.: Too low/high conc. HIER and calibration mandatory for optimal results 50

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours Breast panel: GCDFP15 & Mammaglobin Basic protocol settings for an optimal staining result (NQC) Retrieval Titre Detection RTU Detection mab 23A3 HIER High 1:10-75 3-step Dako 2- & 3-step mab D6 HIER High 1:4-100 3-step - - rmab EP1582Y HIER High 1:500-1.000 3-step Ventana 2- & 3-step mab 304-105 HIER High 1:50-400 2- & 3-step Dako 2-step mab 31A5 HIER High - - Ventana 2-step rmab clone EP1582Y can show positive staining reaction in smooth muscle cells

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours GATA3 reaction pattern ICAPCs Tonsil Kidney App. An at least weak nuclear staining reaction of the majority of T-cells in the T-zones in the tonsil. An at least moderate, distinct nuclear staining reaction of virtually all epithelial cells in collecting ducts and podocytes in glomeruli in the kidney. No staining reaction in epithelial cells should be seen.

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours Breast panel: GATA3 Basic protocol settings for an optimal staining result (NQC) Retrieval Titre Detection RTU Detection mab L50-8023 HIER TE 1:70-500 2- & 3-step Ventana 2- & 3-step GATA3: Highly sensitive for Breast carcinomas (& Urothelial carcinoma). But also seen in other neoplasias Lobular carc. Urothelial carc. Leiomyosarcoma

Breast panel: GCDFP-15 Mammaglobin Gata 3 Smooth MHCM ASMA (p63) E-cadherin p120 ER PR HER-2 Is it primary breast? Is it invasive? Is it lobular or ductal? Which teraphy?

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours SMH reaction pattern ICAPCs A weak to moderate, distinct cytoplasmic staining reaction in the follicular dendritic network of germinal centres. No staining should be seen in epithelial cells. Tonsil Appendix Breast A moderate to strong, distinct cytoplasmic staining reaction of all smooth muscle cells in muscularis propria and vessels. No staining in epithelium. A moderate to strong cytoplasmic staining reaction must be seen in myoepithelium. No staining reaction should be seen in luminal epithelial cells.

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours mab clone SMMS-1 HIER in alk. ph HIER in alk. ph + proteolysis Insufficient HIER provided a too low sensitivity 56

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours p63 / SMH p63 / SMH 57

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours Breast panel: SMH Basic protocol settings for an optimal staining result (NQC) Retrieval Titre Detection RTU Detection mab SMMS1 HIER High 1:200-1.500 2 & 3-step Ventana 3-step rmab EPR5336 HIER High 1:50-100 3-step - -

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours ASMA reaction pattern ICAPCs A moderate to strong, distinct cytoplasmic staining of the majority of the perisinusoidal cells in the liver. No staining should be seen in hepatocytes. Liver Appendix Tonsil A strong, distinct cytoplasmic staining of all the smooth muscle cells in the muscularis propria, lamina muscularis mucosae and myofibroblasts lining the crypts. A moderate to strong cytoplasmic staining must be seen in smooth muscle cells e.g. vessels No staining should be seen in lymphocytes and epithelial cells.

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours AS Bond Ultra Protocol for clone depending on IHC stainer platform mab clone 1A4 (Dako*) Dako AS48 Leica Bond III VMS Ultra Titre 1:100-500* / RTU 1:200-500* 1:100-300* Retrieval HIER TRS High HIER ER 2 None Detection 2- or 3-step 3-step 3-step

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours Breast panel: ASMA Ventana BenchMark Basic protocol settings for an optimal staining result (NQC) Retrieval Titre Detection RTU Detection rmab EP188 P2 4M + CC1M 1:200 3-step OP + AMP - - ASMA: Left: EP188, VMS platform, combined retrieval OptiView + AMP Right: 1A4 Dako platform HIER EnVision FLEX

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours

Breast panel: GCDFP-15 Mammaglobin Gata 3 Smooth MHCM ASMA (p63) E-cadherin p120 ER PR HER-2 Is it primary breast? Is it invasive? Is it lobular or ductal? Which teraphy?

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours ECAD reaction pattern ICAPCs Liver Colon Tonsil An at least weak to moderate membranous staining reaction of virtually all the hepatocytes. A moderate to strong, distinct membranous staining reaction of virtually all the columnar epithelial cells in the colon / appendix. A moderate to strong, distinct membranous staining reaction of virtually all squamous epithelial cells. No staining reaction of the vast majority of lymphocytes.

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours mab clones HECD-1 & NCH-38 most successful HIER 2 or 3-step mul/pol. mab clone 36 aberrant nuclear staining reaction rmab clone EP700y inferior signal-to-noise

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours E-Cadherin Liver CSQI: Hepatocytes

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours Lobular breast carcinoma mab clone HECD-1 or NCH-38 mab clone 36 Technical? Biology?

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours mab 36B5 mab 36 Clone 36 reacts with cytoplasmic component Nuclear localization might occur due to B-Cat mutation (has to be confirmed and no data on breast tumours).

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours NCH-38 vs EP700Y Colon - Kidney NCH-38 Colon - Kidney EP700Y Titre A Colon Kidney EP700Y Titre B

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours ICAPCs Liver An at least weak to moderate membranous staining reaction of virtually all the hepatocytes. A moderate to strong pre-dominantly membranous staining reaction must be seen all epithelial cells of bile ducts. p120 Catenin Tonsil An at least weak to moderate membranous staining reaction of germinal centre macrophages and the follicular dendritic network. 74

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours Ductal carc. p120 Catenin Lobular carc. 75

IHC Protocols and controls for Breast tumours Breast panel: E-Cadherin (& p120) Basic protocol settings for an optimal staining result (NQC) E-CAD Retrieval Titre Detection RTU Detection mab NCH-38 HIER High 1:25-100 2- & 3-step Dako 2- & 3-step mab HECD-1 HIER High 1:200 1.000 2- & 3-step - - mab 36B5 HIER High 1:50 2- & 3-step - - mab ECH-6 HIER High 1:100 2-step - - mab 36 HIER High - - Ventana 2-step* * Short incubation time 8-16 min. and 2-step multimer p120 Retrieval Titre Detection RTU Detection mab MRQ-5 HIER high 1:25-100 2- & 3-step - -