Supplementary Appendix

Similar documents
Methods: Studies included in the analysis

Bortezomib plus Melphalan and Prednisone for Initial Treatment of Multiple Myeloma

, Philip Lewis6, Stefanie Millar7, Jingshan Zhang8, Jay M ei 8 & Michel Delforge

Risk of Second Primary Malignancies (SPMs) Following. Bortezomib (Btz)-Based Therapy: Analysis of Four Phase 3

Supplementary Appendix

Daratumumab: Mechanism of Action

STUDY DESIGN. VMP 6-week cycles, total of 9 cycles. Figure 2. Alcyone study design. Countries housing study sites are shaded in gold.

CREDIT DESIGNATION STATEMENT

Modified dose of melphalan-prednisone in multiple myeloma patients receiving bortezomib plus melphalan-prednisone treatment

Treatment of elderly multiple myeloma patients

Transplant in MM patients: Early versus late. Mario Boccadoro. Barcelona

Effect of cumulative bortezomib dose on survival in multiple myeloma. patients receiving bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone in the phase III

Keywords: multiple myeloma, quality of life, EORTC QLQ-C30, disease stages, integrated analysis.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT

COMy Congress The case for IMids. Xavier Leleu. Hôpital la Milétrie, PRC, CHU, Poitiers, France

AperTO - Archivio Istituzionale Open Access dell'università di Torino

Disclosures. Consultancy, Research Funding and Speakers Bureau: Celgene Corporation, Millennium, Onyx, Cephalon

Treatment Strategies for Transplant-ineligible NDMM Patients

Disclosures. Membership of Advisory Committees: Research Support/ PI: Celgene Corporation Millennium Pharmaceuticals Johnson & Johnson

Standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are not eligible for a transplant

In-depth look at specific data-sets; which ones meet requirements? Individual data owners /cooperative groups

Treatment of elderly patients with multiple myeloma

Elotuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody designed to treat multiple myeloma (MM)

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Key words. bortezomib, efficacy, elderly, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, safety

which to base economic assessment of the products available to treat this hematologic

Background Information

Clínica Universidad de Navarra-CIMA, IDISNA, Pamplona, Spain. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT and NCT

Novel treatment strategies for multiple myeloma: a focus on oral proteasome inhibitors

A bs tr ac t. n engl j med 366;19 nejm.org may 10,

Consolidation and maintenance therapy for transplant eligible myeloma patients

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT

MULTIPLE MYELOMA. The clonoseq Assay can predict progressionfree survival in myeloma patients

Supplementary Appendix

Daratumumab: Mechanism of Action

Choosing upfront and salvage therapy for myeloma in the ASEAN context

Daratumumab plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone for Untreated Myeloma

Disclosures for Palumbo Antonio, MD

Supplementary Online Content

An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 1b Study of Daratumumab in Combination with Backbone Regimens in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. OPEN Leukemia (2017) 31,

Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma

Highlights from EHA Mieloma Multiplo

Effective response with bortezomib retreatment in relapsed multiple myeloma

ABSTRACT. Original Article

KEY WORDS: Multiple myeloma, Autologous transplantation, Induction therapy

Michel Delforge Belgium. New treatment options for multiple myeloma

Experience with bortezomib (Velcade) in multiple myeloma. Peter Černelč Clinical center Ljubljana Department of Haematology

MULTIPLE MYELOMA. The clonoseq Assay can predict progressionfree survival in myeloma patients

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 27 January 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta380

Novel Treatment Advances and Approaches in Management of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Daratumumab: Mechanism of Action

Long-term outcome of patients with mutiple myeloma-related advanced renal failure following auto-sct

A dose increased once-weekly bortezomib-based combination therapy for multiple myeloma

Multiple Myeloma: ASH 2008

CME Information LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Update: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

To Maintain or Not to Maintain? Immunomodulators vs PIs Yes: Proteasome Inhibitors

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 27 July 2011 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta228

Optimizing the use of lenalidomide in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: consensus statement

FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT: CORNERSTONE OF SUCCESSFUL CLINICAL TRIAL PLANNING

Role of Maintenance and Consolidation Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: A Patient-centered Approach

Supplementary Table 1. Baseline Characteristics by Quintiles of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures

Primary Endpoint The primary endpoint is overall survival, measured as the time in weeks from randomization to date of death due to any cause.

Upfront Therapy for Myeloma Tailoring Therapy across the Disease Spectrum

EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE 9: , 2015

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; 2. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; 3

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco & Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Progress in Multiple Myeloma

Lenalidomide plus Dexamethasone for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Update on Multiple Myeloma Treatment

IMiDs (Immunomodulatory drugs) and Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 1 Trial of Lenalidomide (REVLIMID ) With Bortezomib (VELCADE ) in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT

Oncologist. The. Academia Pharma Intersect: Myelomas. Current Multiple Myeloma Treatment Strategies with Novel Agents: A European Perspective

Retrospective analysis of genetic abnormalities and survival in 131 patients with multiple myeloma

TREATMENT FOR NON-TRANSPLANT ELIGIBLE MULTIPLE MYELOMA

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See USPI

Health-related quality of life assessed before and during chemotherapy predicts for survival in multiple myeloma

Getting Clear Answers to Complex Treatment Challenges in Multiple Myeloma: Case Discussions

The FIND-CKD Study Background Study design (Results)

Approach to the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. S. Vincent Rajkumar Professor of Medicine Mayo Clinic

EPIDEMIOLOGIA DEL MIELOMA MULTIPLO E CARATTERISTICHE CLINICHE DEI PAZIENTI Epidemiology of multiple myeloma and clinical characterization of patients

Risk stratification in the older patient; what are our priorities?

P53 Gene Deletion Detected By Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization is an Adverse

Disclosures of: Emanuele Angelucci

To Maintain or Not to Maintain? Lymphoma and Myeloma 2015 Waldorf Astoria Hotel, New York

Ultra High-Risk Myeloma

A.M.W. van Marion. H.M. Lokhorst. N.W.C.J. van de Donk. J.G. van den Tweel. Histopathology 2002, 41 (suppl 2):77-92 (modified)

MULTIPLE MYELOMA AFTER AGE OF 80 YEARS

SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION

Daratumumab, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma

Supplementary. properties of. network types. randomly sampled. subsets (75%

Oncologist. The. Academia Pharma Intersect: Myelomas. Multiple Myeloma Treatment Strategies with Novel Agents in 2011: A European Perspective

Multiple Myeloma in the Elderly: When to Treat, When to Go to Transplant

Terapia del mieloma. La terapia di prima linea nel paziente giovane. Elena Zamagni

BCCA Protocol Summary for Therapy of Multiple Myeloma Using Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone

Abstract. Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; 2 Hospital-12-de-Octubre, Madrid, Spain; 3

Initial Therapy For Transplant-Eligible Patients With Multiple Myeloma. Michele Cavo, MD University of Bologna Bologna, Italy

Long-term ixazomib maintenance is tolerable and improves depth of response following ixazomiblenalidomide-dexamethasone

Key Words: Early Response; Multiple Myeloma; Bortezomib; Survival

Transcription:

Supplementary Appendix This appendix has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. Supplement to: San Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2008;359:906-17.

Supplementary Appendix Bortezomib Plus Melphalan-Prednisone Versus Melphalan-Prednisone in Untreated Multiple Myeloma Patients Ineligible for Stem Cell Transplantation Jesús F. San Miguel 1, Rudolf Schlag 2, Nuriet K. Khuageva 3, Meletios A. Dimopoulos 4, Ofer Shpilberg 5, Martin Kropff 6, Ivan Spicka 7, Maria T. Petrucci 8, Antonio Palumbo 9, Olga S. Samoilova 10, Anna Dmoszynska 11, Kudrat M. Abdulkadyrov 12, Rik Schots 13, Bin Jiang 14, Maria- Victoria Mateos 1, Kenneth C. Anderson 15, Dixie L. Esseltine 16, Kevin Liu 17, Andrew Cakana 18, Helgi van de Velde 18, Paul G. Richardson 15, for the VISTA-MMY-3002 study investigators* 1 Hospital Universitario Salamanca, CIC, IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), Spain; 2 Praxisklinik Dr. Schlag, Würzburg, Germany; 3 SP Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Russian Federation; 4 University of Athens School of Medicine, Greece; 5 Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tiqva, Israel; 6 University of Münster, Germany; 7 University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; 8 University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy; 9 Universita di Torino, Italy; 10 Nizhnii Novgorod Region Clinical Hospital, Russian Federation; 11 Medical University of Lublin, Poland; 12 St Petersburg Clinical Research Institute of Hematology & Transfusiology, Russian Federation; 13 Myeloma Study Group Belgian Hematological Society, Belgium; 14 People s Hospital, Peking University, China; 15 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; 16 Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cambridge, USA; 17 Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C., Raritan, USA; 18 Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium *Other VISTA investigators are listed in the Appendix 1 San_Miguel_VISTA_supplementary_appendix_23May08.doc

SUPPLEMENTARY APPENDIX Part I Patient Disposition 2 Page Part II Additional Secondary End Points 3 6 Part III Time-to-progression and Overall Survival with Bortezomib plus 7 8 Melphalan Prednisone in Patient Subgroups 1 San Miguel VISTA Supplementary Appendix

Supplementary Appendix Part I Patient Disposition Figure 1. CONSORT diagram 2 San Miguel VISTA Supplementary Appendix

Supplementary Appendix Part II Additional Secondary End Points Assessments and Statistical Analysis Additional secondary efficacy end points included progression-free survival, complete plus partial response rate by EBMT criteria, complete response rate by EBMT criteria, time to first response, and time to subsequent myeloma therapy. A further secondary end point was patientreported outcomes, including global health status as measured by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life (QLQ)-C30 questionnaire. Patient-reported outcomes were to be completed at baseline, on day 1 of each cycle during treatment, at the end-of-study visit, and then every 8 weeks, until disease progression. Progression-free survival was defined as the time between randomization and either disease progression or relapse from complete response by EBMT criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Time to first response was defined in patients with confirmed response as the time between randomization and the first documentation of response. Time to subsequent myeloma therapy was defined as the time between randomization and the administration of the first dose of the first subsequent anti-myeloma therapy following completion of study treatment. Progression-free survival and time to subsequent myeloma therapy were compared between treatment groups by stratified log-rank test based on the intent-to-treat population (all randomized patients); time to first response was analyzed from randomization and compared between treatment groups by stratified log-rank test based on all responding patients. Distributions were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Hazard ratios were estimated using the stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Results 3 San Miguel VISTA Supplementary Appendix

Median progression-free survival was 21.7 months with bortezomib plus melphalan prednisone and 15.2 months with melphalan prednisone (hazard ratio, 0.56, P<0.001) (Figure 2A). Median time to first response (partial response or better) was 1.4 months with bortezomib plus melphalan prednisone and 4.2 months with melphalan prednisone (P<0.001); median time to complete response was 4.2 and 5.3 months, respectively (P<0.001). Median time to subsequent myeloma therapy was not reached with bortezomib plus melphalan prednisone and 20.8 months with melphalan prednisone (hazard ratio, 0.52, P<0.001) (Figure 2B), with 36% and 52% of patients, respectively, requiring second-line therapy within 2 years (P<0.001); the associated median treatment-free interval was not reached versus 9.4 months, respectively. Among 121 patients in the melphalan prednisone group who received subsequent therapy, 54 (45%) received treatment that included bortezomib. No differences were seen in patient-reported global health status over the course of treatment (data not shown). 4 San Miguel VISTA Supplementary Appendix

Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier Plots of Progression-Free Survival and Time to Subsequent Myeloma Therapy in the Intent-to-treat Populations of the Bortezomib plus Melphalan Prednisone Group (VMP, N=344) and the Melphalan Prednisone Group (MP, N=338). Panel A shows progression-free survival by investigator assessment based on central laboratory data and applying EBMT criteria. Panel B shows time to subsequent myeloma therapy; the associated median treatment-free interval was not reached versus 9.4 months (P<0.001), respectively. In the melphalan prednisone group 54 of 121 (45%) patients received bortezomib at relapse. A 5 San Miguel VISTA Supplementary Appendix

B 6 San Miguel VISTA Supplementary Appendix

Supplementary Appendix Part III Time-to-progression and Overall Survival with Bortezomib plus Melphalan Prednisone in Patient Subgroups Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier Plots of Time to Disease Progression and Overall Survival in Subgroups of Patients Defined by Age, Creatinine Clearance, and High-Risk Cytogenetics within the Bortezomib plus Melphalan Prednisone Treatment Group. Panel A shows time-to-progression and Panel B shows overall survival in patients aged 75 years or more (n=107) and aged less than 75 years (n=237). Panel C shows time-toprogression and Panel D shows overall survival in patients with creatinine clearance of less than 60 ml/min (n=185) and creatinine clearance of 60 ml/min or more (n=159). Panel E shows time-to-progression and Panel F shows overall survival in patients with high-risk cytogenetics (t(4;14), t(14;16), or 17p deletion; n=26) and with standard-risk cytogenetics (n=142) by fluorescence in situ hybridization. 7 San Miguel VISTA Supplementary Appendix

8 San Miguel VISTA Supplementary Appendix